SoxR Protein Research Articles

Binding of SoxR protein to two promoter-operator regions to regulate sox gene expression: A detailed molecular insight for structural changes and protein-DNA interactions

Abstract SoxR protein is the repressor protein of the sulfur oxidizing sox operon. The most interesting feature of the sox operon is that the operon comes into play only when sulfur substrates are present in the environment. SoxR protein regulates the sox gene expression. Previously, different experimental procedures revealed that SoxR protein interacts with two promoter-operator regions referred to as sv (present between the soxS and soxV genes) and wx (present between the soxW and soxX genes). However, the mechanistic details of the SoxR-DNA interactions have not yet been fully understood. In order to find the mode of the binding interactions between the DNA and the SoxR protein, we employed molecular modeling techniques to build the models of SoxR-DNA complexes. The models of SoxR-DNA complexes were subjected to molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. The details of the binding interactions were then analyzed to predict the plausible mechanistic details. Additionally, the number of hydrogen bonds and ΔG values disclosed the statistically significant thermodynamic stability of the protein for better and firmer interaction with maximum participation of residues.

Sensing Mechanisms in the Redox-Regulated, [2Fe-2S] Cluster-Containing, Bacterial Transcriptional Factor SoxR.

Bacteria possess molecular biosensors that enable responses to a variety of stressful conditions, including oxidative stress, toxic compounds, and interactions with other organisms, through elaborately coordinated regulation of gene expression. In Escherichia coli and related bacteria, the transcription factor SoxR functions as a sensor of oxidative stress and nitric oxide (NO). SoxR protein contains a [2Fe-2S] cluster essential for its transcription-enhancing activity, which is regulated by redox changes in the [2Fe-2S] cluster. We have explored the mechanistic and structural basis of SoxR proteins function and determined how the chemistry at the [2Fe-2S] cluster causes the subsequent regulatory response. In this Account, I describe our recent achievements in three different areas using physicochemical techniques, primarily pulse radiolysis. First, redox-dependent conformational changes in SoxR-bound DNA were studied by site-specifically replacing selected bases with the fluorescent probes 2-aminopurine and pyrrolocytosine. X-ray analyses of the DNA-SoxR complex in the oxidized state revealed that the DNA structure is distorted in the center regions, resulting in local untwisting of base pairs. However, the inactive, reduced state had remained uncharacterized. We found that reduction of the [2Fe-2S] cluster in the SoxR-DNA complex weakens the fluorescence intensity within a region confined to the central base pairs in the promoter region. Second, the reactions of NO with [2Fe-2S] clusters of E. coli SoxR were analyzed using pulse radiolysis. The transcriptional activation of SoxR in E. coli occurs through direct modification of [2Fe-2S] by NO to form a dinitrosyl iron complex (DNIC). The reaction of NO with [2Fe-2S] cluster of SoxR proceeded nearly quantitatively with concomitant reductive elimination of two equivalents S0 atoms. Intermediate nitrosylation products, however, were too unstable to observe. We found that the conversion proceeds through at least two steps, with the faster phase being the first reaction of the NO molecule with the [2Fe-2S] cluster. The slower reaction with the second equivalent NO molecule, however, was important for the formation of DNIC. Third, to elucidate the differences between the distinct responses of SoxR proteins from two different species, we studied the interaction of E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa SoxR with superoxide anion using a mutagenic approach. Despite the homology between E. coli SoxR and P. aeruginosa SoxR, the function of P. aeruginosa SoxR differs from that of E. coli. The substitution of E. coli SoxR lysine residues, located close to [2Fe-2S] clusters, into P. aeruginosa SoxR dramatically affected the reaction with superoxide anion.

Regulation by SoxR of mfsA, Which Encodes a Major Facilitator Protein Involved in Paraquat Resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia MfsA (Smlt1083) is an efflux pump in the major facilitator superfamily (MFS). Deletion of mfsA renders the strain more susceptible to paraquat, but no alteration in the susceptibility levels of other oxidants is observed. The expression of mfsA is inducible upon challenge with redox cycling/superoxide-generating drug (paraquat, menadione and plumbagin) treatments and is directly regulated by SoxR, which is a transcription regulator and sensor of superoxide-generating agents. Analysis of mfsA expression patterns in wild-type and a soxR mutant suggests that oxidized SoxR functions as a transcription activator of the gene. soxR (smlt1084) is located in a head-to-head fashion with mfsA, and these genes share the -10 motif of their promoter sequences. Purified SoxR specifically binds to the putative mfsA promoter motifs that contain a region that is highly homologous to the consensus SoxR binding site, and mutation of the SoxR binding site abolishes binding of purified SoxR protein. The SoxR box is located between the putative -35 and -10 promoter motifs of mfsA; and this position is typical for a promoter in which SoxR acts as a transcriptional activator. At the soxR promoter, the SoxR binding site covers the transcription start site of the soxR transcript; thus, binding of SoxR auto-represses its own transcription. Taken together, our results reveal for the first time that mfsA is a novel member of the SoxR regulon and that SoxR binds and directly regulates its expression.

Binding of promoter DNA to SoxR protein decreases the reduction potential of the [2Fe-2S] cluster.

The [2Fe-2S] transcriptional factor SoxR, a member of the MerR family, functions as a sensor of oxidative stress in Escherichia coli. The transcriptional activity of SoxR is regulated by the reversible oxidation and reduction of [2Fe-2S] clusters. Electrochemistry measurements on DNA-modified electrodes have shown a dramatic shift in the reduction potential of SoxR from -290 to +200 mV with the promoter DNA-bound [ Gorodetsky , A. A. , Dietrich , L. E. P. , Lee , P. E. , Demple , B. , , Newman , D. K. , and Barton , J. K. ( 2008 ) DNA binding shifts the reduction potential of the transcription factor SoxR , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 , 3684 - 3689 ]. To determine the change of the SoxR reduction potential using the new condition, the one-electron oxidation-reduction properties of [2Fe-2S] cluster in SoxR were investigated in the absence and presence of the DNA. The [2Fe-2S] cluster of SoxR was completely reduced by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-cytochrome P450 reductase (CRP) in the presence of a NADPH generating system (glucose 6-dehydrogenase and glucose-6 phosphate), indicating that CRP can serve as an NADPH-dependent electron carrier for SoxR. The reduction potential of SoxR was measured from equilibrium data coupled with NADPH and CRP in the presence of electron mediators. The reduction potentials of DNA-bound and DNA-free states of SoxR were -320 and -293 mV versus NHE (normal hydrogen electrode), respectively. These results indicate that DNA binding causes a moderate shift in the reduction potential of SoxR.

Mechanistic studies on formation of the dinitrosyl iron complex of the [2Fe-2S] cluster of SoxR protein.

The transcriptional activation of SoxR in Escherichia coli occurs through direct modification of the [2Fe-2S] by nitric oxide (NO) to form a dinitrosyl iron complex (DNIC). Here, we investigated the reactions of NO with [2Fe-2S] clusters of SoxR; the results were compared with those obtained for spinach ferredoxin (Fd). UV-visible absorption and ESR spectra of SoxR upon treatment with an NO donor showed the formation of DNIC of SoxR efficiently, whereas those of Fd exhibited small changes. Upon pulse radiolysis of a deaerated solution of SoxR in the presence of sodium nitrite, a biphasic change in absorption, consisting of a faster phase and a slower phase, was observed. The slower phase fraction was increased with increases in the [NO]/[SoxR] molar ratio, reaching a plateau at ∼2 equivalents of NO. On the basis of these results, we propose that the faster phase corresponds to the reaction of the first NO molecule with [2Fe-2S] of SoxR, followed by the reaction of the second NO molecule. In the reaction of NO with Fd, no slower phase was observed. These results suggest that the reaction of the second equivalent of NO is an important process for the formation of DNIC.

Direct Oxidation of the [2Fe-2S] Cluster in SoxR Protein by Superoxide: DISTINCT DIFFERENTIAL SENSITIVITY TO SUPEROXIDE-MEDIATED SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION

The [2Fe-2S] transcription factor SoxR is activated by reversible one-electron oxidation of its [2Fe-2S] cluster, leading to enhanced production of various antioxidant proteins through induction of the soxRS regulon in Escherichia coli. Recently, there has been considerable debate about whether superoxide (O(2)(•)) activates SoxR directly. To elucidate the underlying activation mechanism, we investigated SoxR interaction with O(2)(•) using pulse radiolysis. Radiolytically generated hydrated electrons reduced the oxidized form of the [2Fe-2S] cluster of SoxR within 2 μs. A subsequent increase in absorption in the visible region corresponding to reoxidation of the [2Fe-2S] cluster was observed on a time scale of milliseconds. Addition of human copper/zinc superoxide dismutase inhibited this delayed oxidation in a concentration-dependent fashion (I(50) = 1.0 μm), indicating that O(2)(•) oxidized the reduced form of SoxR directly. The second-order rate constant of this process was estimated to be 5 × 10(8) m(-1) s(-1). A similar result was observed after pulse radiolysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa SoxR. However, superoxide dismutase inhibited the oxidation of reduced SoxR much more effectively in P. aeruginosa, even at a lower concentration (I(50) = 80 nm), indicating that the soxRS response is much more sensitive to O(2)(•) in E. coli than in P. aeruginosa. These results suggest that SoxR proteins play a distinct regulatory role in the activation of O(2)(•).

The SoxRS response of Escherichia coli is directly activated by redox‐cycling drugs rather than by superoxide

When Escherichia coli is exposed to redox-cycling drugs, its SoxR transcription factor is activated by oxidation of its [2Fe-2S] cluster. In aerobic cells these drugs generate superoxide, and because superoxide dismutase (SOD) is a member of the SoxRS regulon, superoxide was initially thought to be the activator of SoxR. Its many-gene regulon was therefore believed to comprise a defence against superoxide stress. However, we found that abundant superoxide did not effectively activate SoxR in an SOD⁻ mutant, that overproduced SOD could not suppress activation by redox-cycling drugs, and that redox-cycling drugs were able to activate SoxR in anaerobic cells as long as alternative respiratory acceptors were provided. Thus superoxide is not the signal that SoxR senses. Indeed, redox-cycling drugs directly oxidized the cluster of purified SoxR in vitro, while superoxide did not. Redox-cycling drugs are excreted by both bacteria and plants. Their toxicity does not require superoxide, as they poisoned E. coli under anaerobic conditions, in part by oxidizing dehydratase iron-sulfur clusters. Under these conditions SoxRS induction was protective. Thus it is physiologically appropriate that the SoxR protein directly senses redox-cycling drugs rather than superoxide.

The NO trafficking between dinitrosyl‐iron complexes (DNIC) and E. coli transcriptional factors containing iron‐sulfur clusters

SoxR protein is a transcriptional factor belonged to a member of the Mer family. The native form of the protein is presented as a dimeric structure and each monomer contains a redox‐active [2Fe‐2S] center. The iron‐sulfur cluster of SoxR is responsive to one‐electron oxidation by superoxide and resulted in subsequent expression of soxS gene for the rescue of oxidative stress such as the expression of superoxide dismutase or catalase. In addition to superoxide, SoxR is also sensitive to nitric oxide (NO) and its nitrosylated protein displayed paramagnetic features where its average g value is appeared at 2.03 in EPR. Despite the crystal structures of SoxR protein with and without the nucleic acids have already been unraveled [1], there is still not sufficient structural information to illustrate how the conformational changes mediated by redox chemistry or NO modulation [2] could lead with the transcriptional activation. In this study, we employed the x‐ray absorption spectroscopic methods to determine the structural insights of metal active sites in SoxR under the oxidized, reduced and nitrosylated conditions, respectively. We anticipate clarifying the major clues that control the corresponding gene regulations resulting from oxidative or nitrosative stress.Financial Support: National Science Council (NSC 98‐2627‐M‐001‐004‐) and Academia Sinica in Taipei

Constitutive SoxS Expression in a Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Strain with a Truncated SoxR Protein and Identification of a New Member of themarA-soxS-robRegulon,mdtG

Elevated levels of fluoroquinolone resistance are frequently found among Escherichia coli clinical isolates. This study investigated the antibiotic resistance mechanisms of strain NorE5, derived in vitro by exposing an E. coli clinical isolate, PS5, to two selection steps with increasing concentrations of norfloxacin. In addition to the amino acid substitution in GyrA (S83L) present in PS5, NorE5 has an amino acid change in ParC (S80R). Furthermore, we now find by Western blotting that NorE5 has a multidrug resistance phenotype resulting from the overexpression of the antibiotic resistance efflux pump AcrAB-TolC. Microarray and gene fusion analyses revealed significantly increased expression in NorE5 of soxS, a transcriptional activator of acrAB and tolC. The high soxS activity is attributable to a frameshift mutation that truncates SoxR, rendering it a constitutive transcriptional activator of soxS. Furthermore, microarray and reverse transcription-PCR analyses showed that mdtG (yceE), encoding a putative efflux pump, is overexpressed in the resistant strain. SoxS, MarA, and Rob activated an mdtG::lacZ fusion, and SoxS was shown to bind to the mdtG promoter, showing that mdtG is a member of the marA-soxS-rob regulon. The mdtG marbox sequence is in the backward or class I orientation within the promoter, and its disruption resulted in a loss of inducibility by MarA, SoxS, and Rob. Thus, chromosomal mutations in parC and soxR are responsible for the increased antibiotic resistance of NorE5.

A study of NO trafficking from dinitrosyl–iron complexes to the recombinant E. coli transcriptional factor SoxR

SoxR is a transcriptional factor in Escherichia coli that induces the expression of SoxS to initiate the production of enzymes in response to oxidative stress. In addition to superoxide, SoxR is also sensitive to cellular NO to produce a protein-bound dinitrosyl-iron complex (DNIC) with a characteristic electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signal at g(av)=2.03. Toward developing a strategy for NO sensing based on this property of SoxR, we have overexpressed and purified the recombinant His-tagged SoxR protein. Upon treatment of the purified protein under anaerobic conditions with (1) NO solution, (2) S-nitrosothiol (RSNO), and (3) chemically synthesized low molecular weight DNICs (LMW-DNICs), we have observed enhancement of the EPR signal at g(av)=2.03 from the protein-bound DNICs over time, reflecting the redistribution of NO from the NO solution, RSNO and LMW-DNICs to the SoxR. We have exploited this NO exchange to investigate the kinetics and mechanisms of release and delivery of NO from various LMW-DNICs to an isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside-dependent SoxR expressed in E. coli cells. These experiments revealed that the NO from RSNO and LMW-DNICs could cross the biological membrane and enter the cytoplasm of the cell to form the SoxR protein-bound DNIC complex. For comparison, we have also studied the direct NO transfer from the LMW-DNICs to the SoxR protein in buffer. The NO transfer was found to be rapid. From the kinetic data derived, we showed that LMW-DNICs with bidentate thiolate ligands displayed greater stability in aqueous solution but exhibited more facile NO delivery to cytoplasmic SoxR in whole cells.

Regulation of superoxide stress in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 is different from the SoxR paradigm in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, the SoxR regulon orchestrates genes for defense against certain types of oxidative stress through the SoxR-regulated synthesis of the SoxS transcription activator. The Pseudomonas putida genome did not reveal a clear soxS homolog. The P. putida SoxR protein appears to be functional: its expression in an E. coli Δ soxR strain restored the paraquat inducibility of soxS. Of nine candidate P. putida oxidative stress genes, which are known to be SoxR regulon in E. coli, tested for response to superoxide or nitric oxide, fumC-1, sodA, zwf-1, and particularly fpr, encoding ferredoxin:NADP + reductase, were induced, all independent of P. putida soxR. Disruption of the fpr and finR, a regulatory protein that is required for paraquat-dependent expression of the fpr, resulted in more oxidative stress sensitivity. However, a P. putida soxR-deletion strain had normal resistance to the superoxide-generating agent paraquat. The data presented here show that the genetic responses to superoxide stress in P. putida differ markedly from those seen in E. coli and Salmonella, and the role of P. putida soxR remains to be established.

Activation of SoxR-Dependent Transcription in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The SoxR protein of Escherichia coli responds to redox signals by activating the transcription of soxS, which encodes another transcription activator that directly stimulates oxidative stress genes. In contrast, Pseudomonas aeruginosa has an open reading frame (ORF) encoding a putative protein homologous to E. coli SoxR, but not to SoxS. Instead of a soxS homolog, ORFs encoding an unknown hypothetical protein and soxR are arranged divergently with their 5' ends separated by a 78 bp region containing a sequence homologous to the SoxR-binding soxS promoter. In this study, we report the overproduction and purification of SoxR from P. aeruginosa to investigate the mechanism of gene activation by SoxR. The spectroscopic properties of the purified SoxR protein indicate that it contains a redox active iron-sulfur [2Fe-2S] cluster. Redox titration of the SoxR protein revealed a midpoint potential of -290 mV. The SoxR protein specifically binds a fragment of the SoxS promoter-like region in a concentration-dependent fashion, as shown by both gel mobility shift and fluorescence polarization assays. The purified SoxR stimulates the in vitro transcription of the gene encoding the hypothetical protein in P. aeruginosa. This activity was lost following reduction of the SoxR [2Fe-2S] clusters. The levels of mRNA in the hypothetical protein increased in paraquat-treated cells. These results indicate that P. aeruginosa SoxR is a direct transcriptional activator of the hypothetical protein, and suggest that SoxR proteins may play multiple regulatory roles as a transcription factor in addition to its protective role in oxidative stress.

Functional Analysis of SoxR Residues Affecting Transduction of Oxidative Stress Signals into Gene Expression

SoxR protein, a member of the MerR family of transcriptional activators, mediates a global oxidative stress response in Escherichia coli. Upon oxidation or nitrosylation of its [2Fe-2S] centers SoxR activates its target gene, soxS, by mediating a structural transition in the promoter DNA that stimulates initiation by RNA polymerase. We explored the molecular basis of this signal transduction by analyzing mutant SoxR proteins defective in responding to oxidative stress signals in vivo.We have confirmed that the DNA binding domain of SoxR is highly conserved compared with other MerR family proteins and functions in a similar manner to activate transcription. Several mutations in the dimerization domain of SoxR disrupted intersubunit communication, and the resulting proteins were unable to propagate redox signals to the soxS promoter. Mutations scattered throughout the polypeptide yielded proteins that were under-responsive to in vivo redox signals, which indicates that the redox properties of the [2Fe-2S] centers are influenced by global protein structure. These findings indicate that SoxR functions as a redox-responsive molecular switch in which subunit interactions transduce a subtle alteration in oxidation state into a profound change in DNA structure.

35] Escherichia coli SoxR protein: Sensor/transducer of oxidative stress and nitric oxide

Publisher Summary The SoxR protein provides a unique example among iron-sulfur proteins: a transcription factor that is directly activated by oxidation of an [2Fe–2S] center without changing its DNA-binding affinity. The structural effects affect the structure of the bound soxS DNA to stimulate transcription and are paralleled by changes in cleavage produced by DNase I and other footprinting reagents. The Escherichia coli SoxR protein governs a cellular response to oxidative stress or nitric oxide (NO). SoxR activity in vitro is controlled by the oxidation state of the [2Fe–2S] centers, which undergo one-electron oxidation and reduction with a midpoint potential of –285 mV. In the reduced state, SoxR binds DNA without activating soxS transcription; oxidation unleashes SoxR transcriptional activity without affecting the DNA-binding affinity. Treatment of SoxR with nitric oxide nitrosylates the iron–sulfur centers, which also generate a strongly activated form of the protein. SoxR in vivo contains reduced [2Fe–2S] centers in the resting state, and the intracellular activation correlates perfectly with oxidation or nitrosylation). These activated forms of SoxR are eliminated rapidly, but the responsible reductase or other activities have not been identified. SoxR constitutes both the sensor of oxidative stress or nitric oxide and the transducer of these signals to gene expression.

Signal transduction by nitric oxide in cellular stress responses.

Nitric oxide (NO) has received wide attention as a biological signaling molecule that uses cyclic GMP as a cellular second messenger. Other work has supported roles for cysteine oxidation or nitrosylation as signaling events. Recent studies in bacteria and mammalian cells now point to the existence of at least two other pathways independent of cGMP. For the E. coli SoxR protein, signaling occurs by nitrosylation of its binuclear iron-sulfur clusters, a reaction that is unprecedented in gene activation. In intact cells, these nitrosylated centers are very rapidly replaced by unmodified iron-sulfur clusters, a result that points to the existence of an active repair pathway for this type of protein damage. Exposure of mammalian cells to NO elicits an adaptive resistance that confers elevated resistance of the cells to higher levels of NO. This resistance in many cell types involves the important defense protein heme oxygenase 1, although the mechanism by which this enzyme mediates NO resistance remains unknown. Induction of heme oxygenase in some cell types occurs through the stabilization of its mRNA. NO-induced stabilization of mRNA is mediated by pre-existing proteins and points to the existence of an important new signaling pathway that counteracts the damage and stress exerted by this free radical.

Differential activities of the SoxR protein of Escherichia coli: SoxS is not required for gene activation under iron deprivation

When Escherichia coli cells are under superoxide stress, proteins SoxR and SoxS, acting sequentially, control the expression of a set of repair and defense genes. One of these genes, fumC, encoding fumarase C, was reported to be also activated by iron deprivation in a soxRS-dependent manner. However, the same condition failed to induce the expression of a soxS′::lacZ fusion. The expression of acnA (aconitase A) is also activated by SoxR alone when under iron deprivation, but not of sodA (Mn-superoxide-dismutase). SoxR completely inhibited the migration of a DNA fragment containing the promoter region of fumC, in gel-shift experiments. SoxR might bind to a different region than SoxS within the fumC promoter, or an unknown intermediate other than SoxS might be acting. It is possible that the regulatory role of SoxR is more complex than previously considered.

Differential activities of the SoxR protein of Escherichia coli: SoxS is not required for gene activation under iron deprivation.

When Escherichia coli cells are under superoxide stress, proteins SoxR and SoxS, acting sequentially, control the expression of a set of repair and defense genes. One of these genes, fumC, encoding fumarase C, was reported to be also activated by iron deprivation in a soxRS-dependent manner. However, the same condition failed to induce the expression of a soxS'::lacZ fusion. The expression of acnA (aconitase A) is also activated by SoxR alone when under iron deprivation, but not of sodA (Mn-superoxide-dismutase). SoxR completely inhibited the migration of a DNA fragment containing the promoter region of fumC, in gel-shift experiments. SoxR might bind to a different region than SoxS within the fumC promoter, or an unknown intermediate other than SoxS might be acting. It is possible that the regulatory role of SoxR is more complex than previously considered.

Direct nitric oxide signal transduction via nitrosylation of iron-sulfur centers in the SoxR transcription activator.

Nitric oxide (NO) has diverse roles in intercellular communication and (at higher levels) in immune-mediated cell killing. NO reacts with many cellular targets, with cell-killing effects correlated to inactivation of key enzymes through nitrosylation of their iron-sulfur centers. SoxR protein, a redox-sensitive transcription activator dependent on the oxidation state of its binuclear iron-sulfur ([2Fe-2S]) centers, is also activated in Escherichia coli on exposure to macrophage-generated NO. We show here that SoxR activation by NO occurs through direct modification of the [2Fe-2S] centers to form protein-bound dinitrosyl-iron-dithiol adducts, which we have observed both in intact bacterial cells and in purified SoxR after NO treatment. Functional activation through nitrosylation of iron-sulfur centers contrasts with the inactivation typically caused by this modification. Purified, nitrosylated SoxR has transcriptional activity similar to that of oxidized SoxR and is relatively stable. In contrast, nitrosylated SoxR is short-lived in intact cells, indicative of mechanisms that actively dispose of nitrosylated iron-sulfur centers.

Genetic responses to free radicals. Homeostasis and gene control.

Gene regulation mechanisms have evolved allowing cells to finetune the level of "endogenous" oxidative stress and to cope with increased free radicals from external sources. Levels of H2O2 are tightly controlled in E. coli by OxyR, which is activated by H2O2 to increase scavenging activities and limit H2O2 generation by the respiratory chain. Sub-micromolar levels of H2O2 are maintained in mammalian tissues, though the regulatory systems that govern this control are unknown. Excess superoxide triggers the soxRS system in E. coli, which is controlled by the oxidant-sensitive iron-sulfur centers of the SoxR protein. Nitric oxide activates SoxR by a different modification of the iron-sulfur centers. The soxRS regulon mobilizes diverse functions to scavenge free radicals and repair oxidative damage in macromolecules, and other mechanisms that exclude many environmental agents from the cell. Mammalian cells also sense and respond to sub-toxic levels of nitric oxide, activating expression of heme oxygenase 1 through stabilization of its mRNA. These inductions give rise to adaptive resistance to nitric oxide in neuronal and other cell types.

Genetic responses against nitric oxide toxicity.

The threat of free radical damage is opposed by coordinated responses that modulate expression of sets of gene products. In mammalian cells, 12 proteins are induced by exposure to nitric oxide (NO) levels that are sub-toxic but exceed the level needed to activate guanylate cyclase. Heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) synthesis increases substantially, due to a 30- to 70-fold increase in the level of HO-1 mRNA. HO-1 induction is cGMP-independent and occurs mainly through increased mRNA stability, which therefore indicates a new NO-signaling pathway. HO-1 induction contributes to dramatically increased NO resistance and, together with the other inducible functions, constitutes an adaptive resistance pathway that also defends against oxidants such as H2O2. In E. coli, an oxidative stress response, the soxRS regulon, is activated by direct exposure of E. coli to NO, or by NO generated in murine macrophages after phagocytosis of the bacteria. This response is governed by the SoxR protein, a homodimeric transcription factor (17-kDa subunits) containing [2Fe-2S] clusters essential for its activity. SoxR responds to superoxide stress through one-electron oxidation of the iron-sulfur centers, but such oxidation is not observed in reactions of NO with SoxR. Instead, NO nitrosylates the iron-sulfur centers of SoxR both in vitro and in intact cells, which yields a form of the protein with maximal transcriptional activity. Although nitrosylated SoxR is very stable in purified form, the spectroscopic signals for the nitrosylated iron-sulfur centers disappear rapidly in vivo, indicating an active process to reverse or eliminate them.