South Jakarta District Research Articles

Responsibilities of Land Deed Making Officials (PPAT) for Sale and Purchase Deed whose Payment Has Not Been Paid

The transfer of land rights through a Sale and Purchase Deed has been debated both in theory and practice. This is evident in cases such as South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 735/Pdt.G/2021, where payment for the sale and purchase of land rights has not been made in full. This research aims to analyze the application of the principle of light and cash in land sale and purchase transactions where the payment has not been paid in full and to examine the legal responsibility of the Land Deed Official (PPAT) in making a Sale and Purchase Deed that does not adhere to the principle. This research method uses a doctrinal approach by analyzing legal materials, both in the form of legislation, jurisprudence, and existing legal concepts. The results show that the principle of light and cash is a fundamental requirement in land sale and purchase transactions. If this principle is not fulfilled, then the transaction becomes null and void because it is contrary to the law. Furthermore, the PPAT who is responsible for making a Sale and Purchase Deed that violates this principle can be held legally liable either civilly, criminally, or administratively. This research has implications for underscoring the importance of compliance with the principle of light and cash in land transactions to ensure legal certainty and protect the rights of all parties. The research also highlights the need for stricter supervision and accountability mechanisms for PPATs to uphold the integrity of land sale and purchase deeds.

CRIMES OF PHYSICAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND NEGLIGENCE IN THE HOUSEHOLD

Study This aim For do study to influencing variables​ happen violence in House stairs (domestic violence) in family , that is form violence physical and neglect . Additionally , research​ this is also purposeful For know action preventing and dealing with domestic violence carried out by husbands to wife , as Decision South Jakarta District Court Number 995/ Pid.Sus /2021/PN Jak.Sel . and Verdict South Jakarta District Court Number 130/ Pid.Sus /2022/PN Bks. Second decision the made with objective For discuss domestic violence problems . Specifically, the South Jakarta District Court and the South Jakarta District Court are the research locations. Both courts are in the South Jakarta area. The data collection process was carried out using several research methodologies, namely library research and field research. Primary data collection can be done by conducting interviews with relevant sources. Apart from that, secondary data was also obtained in the form of papers, books and research reports which were directly related to the topic of domestic violence in the form of physical violence and neglect in the household. This data was collected as additional primary data. To uncover the root causes of domestic violence in the form of physical violence and neglect in families in the South Jakarta and Bekasi City areas, the data obtained was then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. This is done to find out what actions can be taken to reduce the impact of domestic violence. Based on the research results, the main factors that cause domestic violence crimes committed by husbands against their wives are internal factors, especially those related to the personality characteristics (temperament) of the perpetrator. In conditions that trigger uncontrolled anger, such as lack of communication and intense jealousy, these characteristics make it easier for individuals to commit criminal acts. This is because they are more easily affected by these events. It should be noted that education and economic factors are one of the external factors that cause domestic violence. To overcome the problem of criminal acts of domestic violence committed by husbands against wives in South Jakarta, it is necessary to carry out preventive efforts such as instilling moral values from an early age, preventive efforts such as increasing awareness of laws and regulations. , and repressive efforts such as taking action against perpetrators of criminal acts of domestic violence (KDRT).

Construction of Participation in the Crime of Persecution in Indonesia

In criminal law, the construction of participation refers to a situation where a person is involved in a criminal offense, not directly as the main perpetrator, but plays a role in the implementation of the criminal offense. This means that a person can be charged with a crime even though he/she did not physically commit the criminal act, as long as he/she fulfills the elements of participation. The problems faced in this study are how the predicate crime of the crime of persecution in the case of South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 4/Pid.Sus-Child/2023/PN.Jkt.Sel and how the participation in the South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 4/Pid.Sus-Child/2023/PN.Jkt.Sel. The research method used is normative juridical legal research. The research specification used in this research is descriptive analytical. This research uses primary, secondary and tertiary sources of legal material. The approaches used from several approaches above are the statute approach and the case approach and the analysis technique used is qualitative analysis. The results showed that predicate crime in a criminal offense, including persecution, are elements that must be proven legally to declare a person has committed the crime. This predicate serves as the basis for law enforcement to impose a sentence. It must be underlined that each case has different characteristics. Therefore, the application of the law in each persecution case will vary depending on the facts revealed in the trial. Victims of persecution are entitled to legal protection. Participation in the crime of maltreatment is a form of understanding a person's criminal responsibility in a criminal event and in this case, however, in this case, Child AG cannot be classified as “assisting in the commission” because he did not knowingly provide assistance to commit the crime of maltreatment, either before, during or after the maltreatment was committed. There was no conspiracy or providing facilities, information and other efforts in realizing the crime of maltreatment.

Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutuskan Permohonan Afwezigheid PT Bentoel Internasional Investama

This paper intends to investigate the factors taken into account by the judge in determining the absence in the case of PT Bentoel Internasional Investama at the South Jakarta District Court, analyze the procedures for managing assets whose owners are absent based on the applicable regulations in Indonesia, and investigate the compliance of the procedures for managing shares as afwezidheid assets in the case of PT Bentoel Internasional Investama conducted by the Jakarta Balai Harta Peninggalan (BHP) with the regulations in Indonesia. This study is an empirical legal one using a qualitative methodology. Primary and secondary data are the forms of the information applied. Data collecting methods used are literature reviews and interviews. The interviews were carried out applying flexible topic development based on interview rules. This work employs approaches of descriptive analysis. According to the findings of this investigation, the judge decided on the absence petition of PT Bentoel Internasional Investama based on pertinent legal reasons, legal precedents, and facts provided by the petitioner in view of Under the Indonesian Civil Code, Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia No. 27 of 2013, and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. M.02-HT.05.10 of 2005 the process for managing shares as assets whose owners are absent (boedel afwezigheid) by the Jakarta BHP is governed. Regarding PT Bentoel Internasional Investama, the management of afwezigheid shares was done in line with Indonesian laws by means of an application to the South Jakarta District Court, which designated the Jakarta BHP as the legal administrator. This process complies with Articles 463–465 of the Civil Code and Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Number AHU.UM.01.01-235, including public notification of share status in mass media, management, recording, safekeeping of collective share certificates, and BHP reports share management to the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) and the Attorney General's Office and handles official and material tests. Since no objections were found, the Jakarta BHP filed none.

Judicial Study: Parties' Opposition (Partij Verzet) in Proceedings to Execute Land Ownership Rights Under Civil Procedure Law

Court decisions that have legal force must be complied with, and execution carried out if the losing party does not voluntarily comply with the judgment. Issues arise when the losing party appeals or takes other legal actions, delaying execution and creating legal uncertainty. Execution is applicable only to condemnatory judgments and is often obstructed by respondent's resistance, a legal challenge from the party involved in the case. The researcher highlights three cases of legal resistance efforts: the South Jakarta District Court decision number 518/Pdt.G/1999/PN Jkt.Sel, Kendal District Court decision number 20/Pdt.Bth/2021/PN Kdl, and Kendal District Court decision number 9/Pdt.Bth/2022/PN Kdl. This study employs a normative juridical method, examining descriptive-analytical literature, and utilizes a qualitative juridical approach in analysis. The research reveals discrepancies between legal certainty theory and judicial practice, where cases may not align with facts or legal standing, leading judges to reject such requests. The study concludes that respondent's resistance is a legal recourse available to the executed party against execution, which does not automatically suspend execution unless there are clear and accepted grounds recognized by the court. The Indonesian Civil Code (HIR) and Civil Procedure Law (RBg) provide legal certainty and protect the rights of those aggrieved by court decisions through the mechanism of respondent's resistance.

Proof of Coercion and Fraud in the Making of Notarial Deeds Case Study of South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 321/Pdt.G/2016/PN. Jkt. Cell

An agreement is one of the sources of engagement regulated in Chapter II of Book 3 of the Civil Code which can be stated in the form of a Notarial Deed. Authentic deeds clearly stipulate rights and obligations, providing legal certainty. In dispute resolution, authentic deeds function as the strongest written evidence. However, even with perfect evidentiary power, a Notarial Deed cannot be separated from efforts to cancel the contract. Some of the reasons for cancellation are due to defects in the agreement due to elements of coercion and/or elements of deception as stated by the Plaintiff in South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 321/Pdt.G/2016/PN. Jkt. Cell. Based on the research results, the Plaintiff is obliged to provide clear evidence. When compared with the Plaintiff's evidence, the evidence presented by the Plaintiff is not sufficient to prove the argument of coercion or fraud because the Plaintiff's Witnesses did not know that the Plaintiff and the Defendants had entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement. In the process or attempt to cancel a notarial deed, the evidence must be clear and in such a way that the party who has the notarial deed does not need other evidence to state the truth of the notarial deed. With this formulation, the judge no longer needs to test its truth or in other words, an authentic deed has perfect evidentiary power both physically and materially.

An Analysis of Court Decisions Regarding Applications for Interfaith Marriage (Comparative Study of Decisions Number 131/Pdt.P/2021/PN Jkt.Sel and Number 122/Pdt.P/2020/PN.PTI)

The emergence of differences in views regarding whether or not interfaith marriages are permissible in Indonesia because it has not been clearly regulated in the Marriage Law has led several people to apply for interfaith marriages. The aim of this research is to find out the legal basis and considerations of judges in handing down decisions on interfaith marriages in the District Court and the implications of the judge's decisions on these marriages. This research is normative juridical research which is based on several laws and regulations regarding marriage. The results of this research explain that (1) Decision Number 131/Pdt.P/2021/PN Jkt.Sel is an application for permission to register interfaith marriages which was granted by the South Jakarta District Court, where the judge thought there was a lack of explanation of the law because in The law does not expressly prohibit interfaith marriages. The judge's consideration in deciding this case was because he understood Article 2 paragraph 1 of the Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974, which states that marriage is valid according to the laws of each religion and belief. Meanwhile, determination Number 122/Pdt.P/2020/PN.PTI is an application for a marriage permit which was rejected because this application was deemed to contain formal defects so it could not be accepted (niet on vankelijke verklaard). (2) The legal implication of the decree being granted is that there is no problem because legally it is permissible to carry out interfaith marriages. This includes the relationship between husband and wife and their children, which is regulated in law and has permanent legal force. Meanwhile, the implication of a rejected decision regarding the validity of the marriage is that it is invalid and all legal consequences arising from the marriage are not recognized.

<b>ANALISIS PENETAPAN NOMOR 53/PDT.P/2023/PN JKT.SEL MENGENAI PERMOHONAN PENCATATAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA YANG DIKABULKAN OLEH PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA SELATAN</b>

Interfaith marriage is a marriage in which a person with different religious beliefs and still respective to their religions. Formulation of the problem in this study is whether the South Jakarta District Court has the authority to examine and determine applications for registration of marriages of different religions and whether the South Jakarta District Court judge used the legal considerations used in Decision Number 53/Pdt.P/2023/PN Jkt.Sel in accordance with Law Number 1 of 1974 and the Complication of Islamic Law in granting applications for registration of marriages of different religions. The research method uses normative legal research, is analytical descriptive and data collection uses library research and deductive methods of drawing conclusions. Results of the research and discussion of the South Jakarta District Court Judges are indeed authorized to determine interfaith marriages, but even though they are authorized, the South Jakarta District Court Judges should not grant the application. Conclusion is that the South Jakarta District Court Judge uses legal considerations that are contrary to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, the Complication of Islamic Law and religious provisions in Indonesia and also the lack of legal considerations of judges or Onvoldoende gemotiveerd in granting applications for interfaith marriages

Investigating Online Fraud with the BRI Mobile Mode : Modus Operandi and the Gaps in Law Enforcement

<em>Cyber universe was made uproar by the actions of fraudsters posing as bank employees. Fake advertisements are a 'cover' for fraudsters in their efforts to 'drain' victims' money. In 2023, the South Jakarta District Court sentenced 9 perpetrators. this article, we will examine in depth the modus operandi used by the perpetrators, related to legal regulations. a critical assessment will be carried out regarding law enforcement carried out by the Public Prosecutor and the Panel of Judges. The author uses a legal research with statutory and regulatory policies and case approach to answer the problem. The results of the research show that the perpetrators used various modes, where each of these is an independent criminal act. It was found that there were gaps in the legal enforcement of this case, especially by the prosecutor, which included a lack of understanding regarding the ITE Law and other related regulations, as well as inconsistencies in the application of the concurus realis doctrin and sustainable actions, and there were indications of lack of seriousness in handling it, where Article 36 of the ITE Law which is the severity of punishment, is not applied in the indictment</em>

Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Vonis Terhadap Lansia Demensia Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Tindak Pidana

Child molestation is a despicable act that is not only committed by any adults, but also elderly people who may suffer from dementia that may be at cronic stage. Criminal liability for elderly people with dementia has to be medically observed or medical forensic observation by certified mental health doctors. If a psychiatric expert states that the defendant suffer from a severe mental health that may be exampted by the law, then the defendant has the potential to be waved from penal punishment. The aim of this research is to determine the judge's considerations in giving sentences to defendants who is an elderly with cronic dementia. This research uses a normative juridical research method. The results of his research showed that elderly people with dementia were still found guilty because they were proven to have committed a criminal act, in their consideration the judge took into account aggravating and mitigating factors so that in their decision the judge sentenced the defendant to serve his sentence not in prison but sent him to a mental hospital. to be treated. In conclusion, the judge still sentenced the defendant because the judge believed that the defendant committed his actions before experiencing dementia, so the Panel of Judges at the South Jakarta District Court sentenced the defendant to 6 (six) months in prison and a fine of Rp. 20,000,000.00 (twenty million rupiah), and pay restitution in the amount of Rp. 38,736,550 (thirty-eight million seven hundred thirty-six thousand five hundred and fifty rupiah).

PERMASALAHAN HUKUM PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DI INDONESIA: STUDI KOMPARATIF

Over time, there has been a surge in interfaith marriages between men and women, which has led to a number of social and legal challenges. The Indonesian Conference on Religion and Peace (ICRP) registered 1,655 interfaith weddings from July 19, 2023, and 2005. The year 2023 has drawn significant attention, particularly after the South Jakarta District Court approved interfaith marriages by referring to Article 35, Letter A of Law No. 23 of 2006. Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 2 of 2023, which offers guidance for judges in making decisions pertaining to the registration of marriages between people of various faiths and beliefs, was issued by the Supreme Court in response to this circumstance.Keywords : Marriage; Different Religion; Supreme Court

Hospital Legal Liability In Medical Dispute Resolution (Case Study Of South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 484/PDT.G/2013/PN.JKT.Sel)

This research was conducted to determine the cause of negligence committed by medical personnel, and how to resolve medical disputes by analyzing the South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 484/Pdt.G/2013/PN.JKT.Sel. Further research was carried out by looking at the case related to the legal liability of hospitals for the negligence of their medical personnel by reviewing the Civil Code, Law Number 26 of 2009 concerning Health, Law Number 44 of 2009 concerning Hospitals, Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning the Practice of Medicine, Law Number 36 of 2014 concerning Health Workers, and other related laws and regulations. It then examines whether or not the judge is appropriate in deciding a malpractice case. This research uses normative juridical research with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The result of this study is that the legal relationship between hospitals, doctors, and patients gives birth to rights and obligations for the parties based on the therapeutic agreement that has been regulated in Article 46 of Law Number 44 of 2009 concerning Hospitals, so that patients receive legal protection due to alleged malpractice committed by medical personnel, in this case doctors with the current laws and regulations

Rancangan Aplikasi Agenda dengan Fitur Push Notification dan Reminder Berbasis Android Studi Kasus pada Kantor Kejaksaan Negeri Jakarta Selatan

This research aims to develop an Android-based agenda application with push notification and reminder features to support activity management in the Civil Law and State Administration Sector of the South Jakarta District Attorney's Office. Currently, management of the activity agenda is still done manually, causing frequent forgetting regarding the schedule that will or is currently taking place. Through an application development approach, this research creates an effective solution in the form of an agenda application that provides notifications on mobile devices when there is a new agenda or schedule in progress. This application is based on Android, uses the Java programming language, XML as the user interface, and integrates Firebase technology, such as Firebase Notification, Firebase Cloud Messaging, and Firebase Realtime Database. It is hoped that the results of this research will make it easier for employees and prosecutors to access and manage information regarding activity schedules, as well as provide automatic reminders. By implementing this application, it is hoped that the performance of the South Jakarta District Prosecutor's Office can be more efficient in carrying out its duties and functions, while the publication of this system can be an effective means of conveying information to all employees.

Legal Effects Of Bankruptcy On Marital Couples Without A Marital Agreement

Male and female couples marry to have offspring. If a couple does not have a marriage agreement, it could affect the property they own together, especially if one goes bankrupt. This research is descriptive-analytical research that leads to normative juridical research. Based on the research results, it is found that in bankruptcy, the debtor (husband) cannot pay and settle debts with his creditors, resulting in a joint property without a marriage agreement being included in the bankruptcy. As a result of this decision, the debtor's wife did not accept. She filed a lawsuit with the South Jakarta District Court (Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 510/Pdt.G/2019/PN Jkt.Sel). It was stated that the lawsuit could not be accepted or rejected because the South Jakarta District Court lacked the authority to examine and decide on bankruptcy cases. According to the results, the union of property is the union of assets and the burden of payment. The legal consequences of marital property without a marriage agreement, if one of the parties falls into bankruptcy, the bankruptcy of the husband and wife against their joint property through a court decision will be considered joint bankruptcy by the provisions in Article 64, Paragraph 1, of Law No. 37 of 2004.

Normative Juridical Analysis of the Decision South Jakarta District Court No. 508/pdt.p/2022/pn jkt.Sel About Interfaith Marriage

Indonesia is a country with various religions that makes influence factors of pluralism. There are many diverse and recognized religions in Indonesia, so this has led to many different religious marriages being proposed in Indonesia. This article is about to discuss the normative juridical analysis of the South Jakarta District Court decision No. 508/Pdt.P/2022/PN JKT. The cell under review also uses an approach to Islamic law and positive law. The writing of this article uses a library research approach by examining journals, theses and other theses related to interfaith marriage. As for the results of this study, according to Islamic law (Al-Qur’an and Madhzab Ulama) interfaith marriage is permitted on condition that the woman is not a polytheist and is a woman of the Bible. According to Positive Law (KHI Article 40 & Article 44 and Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage Article 2 paragraph 1) it is explained that interfaith marriage is illegal and cannot be carried out by both Muslim men and non-Muslim women. Then according to the MUI Fatwa Number 4/MUNAS VII/MUI/8/2005 the law is haram with the consideration that interfaith marriages cause more mafsada than benefits

Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga: Konsekuensi Hukum dan Perlindungan Korban

Recently, TV stations and social media were enlivened by news about domestic violence (KDRT) committed by artist FI against his wife who is also an artist named VM in a hotel in East Java. Previously, domestic violence among fellow LK artists was also horrified who experienced violence perpetrated by RB and this case ended with recovery and revocation of the police report. On social media, the viral video of domestic violence experienced by a child from his father, a businessman named RIS, has been determined as an allegation of a report from his wife after the examination and case title. Domestic violence against children which shocked the Indonesian public occurred in 1984 which was experienced by 7-year-old AH who died after being abused by his own biological father and mother. The South Jakarta District Court found Saya guilty and was sentenced to 5 years in prison while his wife S was sentenced to 3 years in prison. This research method uses a type of normative legal research that is carried out or focuses on positive legal norms in the form of laws and regulations with an empirical juridical approach by reviewing normative or juridical concepts regarding the implementation of legal protection for victims of domestic violence (KDRT) who are victims of crime. The conclusion of this study is that the reasons for the occurrence of acts of physical violence within the household (KDRT) by husbands against wives and/or children: infidelity factors, economic factors, psychological factors and the nature of the husband, educational factors, third party factors (family) and legal consequences due to acts of physical violence within the household (KDRT) by husbands against wives and/or children can be carried out through non-litigation through P2TP2A and Komnas Perempuan while handling litigation through police reporting.

Notary Responsibilities for Making Deeds Based on False Statements (Case Study of Decision Number: 782/PDT.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL)

Notaries are public officials (openbare ambtenaren) appointed by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (KEMENKUMHAM) who have the authority to make authentic deeds. The notary deed clearly explains the rights and obligations of the parties so that the notary deed becomes the strongest and most complete means of evidence because it can prove the truth of its contents compared to a deed made privately. If a Notary as a public official is proven to have made a mistake in the deed they made, then as a result of their actions they can be held accountable both criminally and civilly if it causes a loss. In the case of the South Jakarta District Court decision number 782/PDT.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL a Notary in Tangerang was involved in a civil case of unlawful acts that resulted in the deed’s cancellation. A notary deed that is canceled by a court decision does not mean the result of a notary's mistake in making the deed, but can also be caused by an error or negligence on the part of the parties resulting in a lawsuit because the notary has made the deed in accordance with the regulations. The notary as a public official has the right to refuse not to notify the contents of the deed in accordance with the oath of office they uttered and taking the minutes of the deed and calling the notary must go through the approval of Notary Honorary Council as an institution that has the authority to carry out guidance and supervision of the notary and the existence of the right of refusal. become a form of legal protection for Notaries when carrying out their duties. This study uses normative legal research methods, by analyzing court decisions as the primary legal.

Analisis Aspek Hukum Pidana dalam Menangani Kejahatan Perdagangan Narkotika Studi Kasus: Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No.133/Pid.Sus/2023/PN JKT.SEL)

This article analyzes the criminal law aspects in combating drug trafficking through a case study of the verdict of South Jakarta District Court Number 133/Pid.Sus/2023/PN JKT.SEL. Juridical-normative and qualitative approaches are employed to analyze the case facts, legal arguments, sentencing considerations, and social impacts of the court's decision. Case study, descriptive, comparative, and content analysis methods are utilized to gain a comprehensive understanding of the legal and social aspects involved in addressing drug trafficking cases. The research findings provide insights into the implementation of criminal law, social influences, and countermeasures against drug trafficking crimes. Recommendations can be made for the improvement of handling similar cases in the future.

TINJAUAN HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH TERHADAP SHOPEEPAY LATER

Qardh is a binding legal binding transaction from the creditor after the debtor receives the debt from him. Developments in the field of information technology are now experiencing rapid progress with e-commerce, namely buying and selling transactions or online trading, which is often done in a marker place or an online trading place where sellers only receive money when the goods reach the buyers. Buying and selling through the marketplace and e-commerce is allowed on the condition that the product specifications must be clearly identified and can be handed over as agreed. Shopee is one of the most successful marketplaces and is favored by its users in Indonesia, the qard contract was applied in one of the transaction payment methods, the ShopeePay Later method where this method presents instant loans provided by Shopee users who already have an online shop at Shopee. With the ShopeePay Later method shopee users can enjoy installments with 0% interest. ShopeePay later dispute resolution is resolved through al-shulh and if it is not consensus then it is resolved in the South Jakarta District Court.

JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF PEOPLE OF THE CRIME OF PLANNING MURDER AS JUSTICE COLLABORATORS ACCORDING TO CRIMINAL LAW IN INDONESIA

The murder incident involving several police officers as the perpetrators of the victim who was also a member of the National Police made this case attract public attention. It was concluded that this case was a case of ordinary murder between fellow police officers using a shootout mode, but because one of the witnesses volunteered as a Justice Collaborator, this case was not an ordinary murder case, but rather a murder that had been planned and there was an attempt to manipulate the case involving dozens of police officers. Several police officers were even prosecuted because they were considered an obstruction of justice in this case. This research aims to see the position of the Justice Collaborator Provisions in the Criminal Law System in Indonesia and how the Justice Collaborator is implemented in Premeditated Murder Crime Cases based on the South Jakarta District Court Decision Case Study Number 798/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Sel. ). This type of research is normative legal research, using a statutory regulation approach, concept approach and case approach. The author concludes that the justice collaborator provisions in the legal system in Indonesia are that the perpetrator is not the main perpetrator and the case he experienced was a particular case that could cause serious disruption to society. Apart from that, perpetrators who are declared justice collaborators must be given awards for their cooperation in uncovering cases. Based on the judge's considerations and decisions, the perpetrator can be designated as a justice collaborator because he is not the main actor but only as an errand boy. As for the case, even though it is classified as a conventional crime, this case is considered to be undermining the image of the police institution because there was an attempt to fabricate the case by the intellectual actor who was a high-ranking National Police official.