Environmental and energy economics has grown broad and diverse. The challenges of managing environmental quality, specially in light of climate change and growing energy demands, are well-recognized and becoming increasingly important. t the same time, the research methods of environmental and energy economics continue to advance and provide a basis for ore informed decision making. Mirroring trends in empirical economics generally, environmental and energy economists re placing ever more emphasis on careful identification strategies that underlie conclusions about causal effects. Environmental and energy economists are making greater use of randomized laboratory and field experiments, have rained their eyes to spot natural experiments, and are refining quasi-experimental methods for use in observational studies. he emphasis on identification and causality has brought with it more careful thinking about the sources of variation in data, he presence of self-selection, the assumptions needed for consistent and/or unbiased estimation, and the importance of stablishing the robustness of estimates across possible specifications. With increased data collection capabilities and efforts n the part of government agencies, nonprofit organizations and businesses to increase data availability, these identification ools, in turn, provide important synergistic opportunities. This special issue of the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) on “The Identification of Causal Effects in nvironmental and Energy Economics” showcases some of the leading research in the field. The included articles were art of a workshop in July 2013 generously hosted by the Howard H. Baker Jr. Center for Public Policy at the University of ennessee. The Baker Center was established to honor the legacy of Senator Baker, whose contributions to public policy ere numerous and include facilitating passage of the Clean Water Act of 1972 and the Clean Air Act of 1970. As the Baker enter has developed its portfolio of research and policy engagement, it has maintained a steady course in focusing on nvironmental and energy policy issues. Consistent with this agenda, the workshop attracted papers that span a wide range f methodologies and policy-relevant topics within the field of environmental and energy economics. We thank Matthew urray, the Director of the Baker Center, along with the Baker Center staff, for their help in making the workshop such a uccess. Many of the papers focus on topics related to demand for electricity, and three of them exploit high resolution residential illing data. Benjamin Gilbert and Joshua Graff Zivin investigate how exposure to expenditure information via the receipt f an electricity bill affects the pattern of electricity consumption. Their identification strategy relies on exogenous variaion in billing cycles and the availability of hourly consumption data from smart meters. They find reduced consumption ollowing receipt of an electricity bill, with the implication that spending “reminders” can reduce peak demand, particuarly during summer months. Katrina Jessoe, David Rapson, and Jeremy Smith consider how shifting to time-of-use billing ffects electricity demand using a regression discontinuity approach. They find a surprising response where the program ffectively lowered the price of electricity: they observe a decrease rather than an increase in consumption, for which hey conjecture explanations based on dynamic considerations and behavioral factors. The paper by Matthew Harding and lice Hsiaw focuses entirely on psychological and behavioral motives related to voluntary energy conservation. Based on