Upload Source Research Articles

Assessment of the Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of Information About Retinoblastoma on YouTube.

To evaluate the quality, reliability, and popularity of YouTube videos addressing retinoblastoma. This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, register-based study. A YouTube search was performed using the keyword retinoblastoma and the first 100 videos that came out were included in the study. Duplicate videos, videos that were not in English, and videos that were less than 1 minute were excluded. The number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, video type (uploaded by physicians, uploaded by public or private institution, uploaded by health channel or uploaded by patients), and country of origin were evaluated for all videos. The popularity of the videos was evaluated with the Video Power Index. The quality of the videos was measured using the DISCERN score (DISCERN), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score (GQS). Of the 100 videos, 70 videos met the criteria and were included in the study. The mean DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores were 42.54 ± 18.77, 2.14 ± 1.03, 2.87 ± 1.42 and 2.99 ± 1.44, respectively. On examining the upload source 18 (25.7%) videos were uploaded by private institutions, 15 (21.4%) videos by physicians, 14 (20.0%) videos by public institutions, 14 (20.0%) videos by health channels, and 9 (12.9%) videos by patients. There was a significant level of agreement between the two commentators evaluating the videos with a power of 91.6% (kappa score: 0.916). Videos uploaded by physicians and public or private institutions had significantly higher DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores. The content of YouTube videos regarding retinoblastoma is generally of moderate quality for patients. Increasing the number of videos uploaded by physicians and public or private institutions will increase the quality, reliability, and informative value of the videos. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;X(X):XXX-XXX.].

Reliability of YouTube videos on the management of orthodontic emergencies during COVID-19 pandemic: A quantitative and qualitative analysis.

To assess the content of YouTube videos on the management of orthodontic emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. YouTube was systematically searched using the keywords "orthodontic emergency," "orthodontic homecare," "braces emergency," and "braces homecare." The first 100 videos for each keyword were assessed. The upload source, number of views, likes and dislikes, duration, and global quality score were extracted. Home and clinical advice reliability was evaluated using the reliability score (DISCERN) according to the COVID-19 orthodontic emergencies protocol published by the British Orthodontic Society. The majority of the videos were found to be poor quality. Home care advice showed higher reliability than clinical advice. Orthodontic emergency videos uploaded by healthcare professionals had higher reliability. Many types of orthodontic emergencies have received little attention on YouTube, and more useful and reliable educational videos should be uploaded in the event of future pandemics.

Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos As Information Source for Breast Self-Examination.

Introduction Breast self-examination (BSE) is essential for early detection of breast cancer to lower the disease's morbidity and death rate. Education about the proper application reinforces its effectiveness. YouTube is an emerging modality for education distribution. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the quality and reliability of BSE videos on YouTube. Materials and methods A web search of YouTube was conducted using the term "breast self-examination". The first 50 relevant videos found through this search were compiled and evaluated. Video reliability was evaluated by applying benchmark criteria from the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). The educational quality of the videos was evaluated using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and the guidelines' comprehensiveness score for BSE-specific instructions. Results The mean number of views was 311,625.9. Medical sources were the most common upload sources, which were found in 60% of the analyzed videos (30 videos), while examination demonstration was the most common type of video content (33 videos, 66%), followed by examination information (15 videos, 30%). However, a significant association was found between videos containing both examination information and demonstration and better educational quality. Regarding video reliability, 34% of videos (17 videos) scored 0, and only 2% (one video) scored four. According to the GQS, only 8% (four videos) were of excellent quality, while the majority (20 videos, 40%)were of suboptimal quality. Based on the BSE comprehensiveness score, the mean score was seven out of nine. Conclusions Videos containing examination information and demonstrations showed the best educational quality. Although most of the YouTube videos of BSE showed a high comprehensiveness score for BSE-specific instructions, their JAMA reliability and GQS scores were poor.

Video quality of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease on TikTok: A cross-sectional study.

The short-video application TikTok shows great potential for disseminating health information. We assessed the content, sources, and quality of information in videos related to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) on TikTok. Our study aims to identify upload sources, content, and characteristic information for NAFLD videos on TikTok and further evaluate factors related to video quality. We investigated the top 100 videos related to NAFLD on TikTok and analyzed the upload sources, content, and characteristics of these videos. Evaluate video quality using the DISCERN tool and Global Quality Score (GQS). In addition, the correlation between video quality and video characteristics is further studied. In terms of video sources, the majority of NAFLD videos on TikTok (85/100, 85%) were posted by doctors, ensuring the professionalism of the content, and among the video content, disease knowledge was the most dominant video content, accounting for 57% (57/100) of all videos, and the average DISCERN and GQS scores of all 100 videos were 39.59 (SD 3.31) and 2.99 (SD 0.95), respectively. DISCERN and GQS data show that videos related to NAFLD do not have high-quality scores on TikTok, mainly fair (68/100, 68%) and moderate (49/100, 49%). In general, the quality of NAFLD video information from professional content and professional sources was higher than that of nonprofessional sources and nonprofessional content, the video quality of general surgeons was better than that of other department physicians, and the video quality of junior physicians was better than that of senior physicians. In terms of video correlation, durations, the number of fans, and the total number of works were negatively correlated with DISCERN scores (R < 0, P < .05), while likes, comments, collections, shares, and days since upload were not significantly correlated with DISCERN and GQS scores (P > .05). The medical information on TikTok is not rigorous enough to guide patients to make accurate judgments, platforms should monitor and guide publishers to help promote and disseminate quality content.

Evaluation of YouTube as a Health Education Resource for Skin Graft Procedures.

Recent studies indicate that YouTube has become a primary source of healthcare information for patients. Videos about skin graft procedures on YouTube have accumulated millions of views, yet there lacks a publication investigating the educational quality of this content. With current literature revealing misleading healthcare information found on YouTube, this study aims to evaluate the educational quality of videos related to skin graft procedures. YouTube was searched for various terms such as "Skin Graft Procedures" and "Skin Graft Surgery." 105 videos were assessed, with 21 excluded. Four independent reviewers rated the material with the Global Quality Scale (5 = highest quality, 1 = lowest quality) to judge educational value. Viewership, source, modality, and date of upload were also collected from each video and compiled for further analysis. The average Global Quality Scale was 2.60 amongst all videos, with videos led by physicians recording significantly higher scores than those not led by physicians (p<0.01). In comparing educational modalities, physician-led presentations provided the highest educational value, whereas live surgeries and consumer-friendly content contained low educational quality (p<0.01). Assessing videos split into cohorts based on viewership noted a significantly higher Global Quality Scale in videos with lower view counts (p<0.05). Skin graft videos on YouTube largely provide low quality information. Videos performed by physicians, particularly physician-led presentations, significantly improved the educational quality of skin graft content. Physicians must involve themselves in enhancing the quality of online content to better guide patients in navigating treatment options and making healthcare decisions.

Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A cross-sectional study.

Due to the lengthy and challenging nature of traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation, patients and carers increasingly rely on YouTube for information. However, no previous research has assessed the quality and reliability of these TBI rehabilitation videos on this platform. This study aims to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on TBI rehabilitation. In this cross-sectional study, a YouTube search with the keyword "traumatic brain injury rehabilitation" was performed, and the first 100 videos were listed according to relevancy. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 72 videos were included in the analysis. DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association, and Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the videos. Video characteristics, including the number of likes, dislikes, duration, and source of upload, were recorded. The mean DISCERN total score was determined to be 39.56 ± 8.4. Additionally, the mean Journal of the American Medical Association score was 1.93 ± 0.57, the Global Quality Score was 2.6 ± 0.81, and the DISCERN quality score was 2.55 ± 0.79. Analysis showed that videos with a longer duration (P < .001) and those uploaded earlier (P = .002) were more likely to be of higher quality. Videos produced by healthcare professionals had higher DISCERN scores (P = .049) than those uploaded by non-healthcare professionals. Examination of YouTube videos on TBI rehabilitation indicates a moderate overall quality. The study revealed that videos uploaded by healthcare professionals have higher quality. For obtaining reliable information on TBI rehabilitation, it is also advisable to prioritize videos with longer durations and earlier upload dates. Given the significant role of social media platforms in educational outreach for rehabilitation, it is crucial to enhance the quality of these videos through appropriate measures.

Content, educational value and quality analysis of videos about neurorehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis on YouTube®.

The use of YouTube® has spread among patients with chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). These patients consult the available videos to learn more about their disease in terms of diagnosis and making decisions about treatments, including rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the content, educational value, and quality analysis of MS videos about neurorehabilitation on YouTube® using quantitative instruments. A search was conducted on YouTube®. The first 30 videos that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The videos were classified according to the upload source and the content. All videos included in the review were assessed by the DISCERN questionnaire, the JAMA benchmark, the global quality scale (GQS) and the video information and quality index (VIQI). The mean scores were: 28.3 (±9.33) in DISCERN, 2 (±0.81) in JAMA, 2.57 (±1.22) in GQS, and 11.73 (±4.06) in VIQI. JAMA score statistically significantly differed according to upload source (p = 0.002), video content (p = 0.023) and the speaker (p = 0.002). The DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, and VIQI scores showed significant correlations with each other. The analyzed videos about neurorehabilitation in people with MS on YouTube® were quite old since the upload, with a moderate duration and number of views, but with a poor quality of the content, educational value, and quality analysis of the videos. Our research showed that there were statistically significant differences in terms of quality, transparency, and reliability of the information, depending on the upload source, video content and the speaker.

Bruxism treatment on Youtube: evaluating reliability and information accuracy

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the content and quality of videos about bruxism treatments on YouTube, a platform frequently used by patients today to obtain information.MethodsA YouTube search was performed using the keywords “bruxism treatment” and “teeth grinding treatment”. “The sort by relevance” filter was used for both search terms and the first 150 videos were saved. A total of 139 videos that met the study criteria were included in the study. Videos were classified as poor, moderate or excellent based on a usefulness score that evaluated content quality. The modified DISCERN tool was also used to evaluate video quality. Additionally, videos were categorized according to the upload source, target audience and video type. The types of treatments mentioned in the videos and the demographic data of the videos were recorded.ResultsAccording to the usefulness score, 59% of the videos were poor-quality, 36.7% were moderate-quality and 4.3% were excellent-quality. Moderate-quality videos had a higher interaction index than excellent-quality videos (p = 0.039). The video duration of excellent-quality videos was longer than that of moderate and poor-quality videos (p = 0.024, p = 0.002). Videos with poor-quality content were found to have significantly lower DISCERN scores than videos with moderate (p < 0.001) and excellent-quality content (p = 0.008). Additionally, there was a significantly positive and moderate (r = 0.446) relationship between DISCERN scores and content usefulness scores (p < 0.001). There was only a weak positive correlation between DISCERN scores and video length (r = 0.359; p < 0.001). The videos uploaded by physiotherapists had significantly higher views per day and viewing rate than videos uploaded by medical doctors (p = 0.037), university-hospital-institute (p = 0.024) and dentists (p = 0.006). The videos uploaded by physiotherapists had notably higher number of likes and number of comments than videos uploaded by medical doctors (p = 0.023; p = 0.009, respectively), university-hospital-institute (p = 0.003; p = 0.008, respectively) and dentists (p = 0.002; p = 0.002, respectively).ConclusionsAlthough the majority of videos on YouTube about bruxism treatments are produced by professionals, most of the videos contain limited information, which may lead patients to debate treatment methods. Health professionals should warn patients against this potentially misleading content and direct them to reliable sources.

Recommended exercises for lower back pain on YouTube videos; Are they useful or harmful?

ObjectiveLow back pain (LBP), a common public health problem affecting nearly 80 % of the population, causes disability and work absence, while exercise is recommended as an adjuvant treatment. YouTube is one of the most frequently used source of information, especially by patients. The aim of the study was to analyze clinically the reliability, feasibility and the content quality of exercises videos recommended for LBP on YouTube. channel. MethodsBased on the observational study of the number of views of YouTube videos, 154 videos worth evaluation were selected using the keywords "low back pain” and “exercises",. The content quality of each video was evaluated with a) the American Medical Association Journal (JAMA), b) DISCERN, c) Global Quality Score (GQS), and d) Medical Quality Video Assessment Tool (MQ-VET) scales, while Pearson correlation analysis was performed to determine the correlation between the JAMA, GQS, DISCERN, MQ-VET scale scores. ResultsAccording to the findings, the primary source for uploading exercise videos were physicians (32.5 %), with a high content quality. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the total scores of all quality scales and the independent variables defined as view rates and number of comments (p < .05). The analysis of the video content showed that only 35 % (n = 54) of the videos explained the risks of the recommended exercises in detail ConclusionIt can be concluded that the relability and feasibility of exercise videos for LBP on YouTube depend highly on the upload source. Thus digital content in health should be created with a multi-disciplinary team including healthcare professionals and also standardized to inform patients with the risks and benefits to avoid the potential harm due to the complex causes of low back pain. Public Interest SummaryLow Back Pain, which a major health problem, is the most common musculoskeletal disorder leading to increased medical expenses and work absenteeism, while the most appropriate intervention remains elusive.. The therapeutic exercise program might differ according to patient's age, physical condition and the severity of the disease, while sustainability of the exercise program depends on the preference of exercise type of each patient. From this perspective, it is an important advantage that different exercise videos are available on YouTube. However, the content quality and reliability of exercise videos are the discriminators for the expected outcomes, since good quality content will benefit patients and prevent possible injuries and worsening of pain.

Quality and Reliability Analysis of Videos About Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate on YouTube

ObjectivesTo assess the reliability and quality analyses of ThuLEP videos on YouTube, as a source of public information. Materials and methodsIn this study, a YouTube search with the keyword “ThuLEP” was performed on November 15, 2022 and 142 videos were listed according to relevance. Video features and source of upload were recorded. The quality of videos was evaluated by using both the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) score and the Global Quality Score(GQS); the reliability of videos was evaluated by using 5-point modified DISCERN tool,respectively. The correlation analysis was performed by using Spearman test between video features and these three scores. Results77 videos were analysed after exclusion and the most common source of upload were urologists (54.5%) and the videos containing only ThuLEP surgery (74%) were the majority of the videos. The median JAMA score, 5-point modified DISCERN score, and GQS were 2, 1, 1, respectively. There were no statistical differences in these three scores according to the source of the upload. All three scores were analysed separately by language and no significant statistical difference was found.There was a positive correlation between the video power index and as well as JAMA, GQS and m. DISCERN scores. ConclusionsDespite abundant videos on ThuLEP on YouTube, most of these videos are not targeted to public and information provided may not be as useful for patients. Information presented in these videos may be inaccurate and not reliable.

Content Analysis of YouTube™ Videos Related to Anaesthesia Practices in Circumcision Surgery in Children

Aim:The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the information provided for patients by the videos on anaesthesia applications in circumcision surgeries in children on YouTube™ video platform,an internet information source. Materyal and Methods:The keywords ‘anaesthesia in circumcision surgery’ and ‘anaesthesia in circumcision surgery in children’ were typed into the search bar on YouTube™.A total of 220 videos were watched.The date of upload, number of views,duration,number of likes and dislikes,source of upload and number of comments were recorded.The reliability and quality of the video were assessed using the Global Quality Scale(GQS) and the modified DISCERN scale. Results:After exclusion criteria, a total of 38 videos were evaluated.The videos were divided into four groups according to the anaesthetic method mentioned/recommended in the content.When compared between the groups in terms of GQS score,modified DISCERN score and video content,it was observed that the mean scores of the videos in the local anaesthesia group were statistically significantly lower than those in both general and local anaesthesia groups, separated by age(p

Is YouTube a Useful Source of Information on Pressure Injuries? A Content, Reliability, and Quality Analysis.

To evaluate the comprehensiveness, reliability, and quality of YouTube videos related to pressure injuries. The authors searched YouTube for relevant videos using the keywords "pressure injury", "pressure ulcer", "bedsore", "pressure injury etiology", "pressure injury classification", "pressure injury prevention", "pressure injury risk assessment", and "pressure injury management". Of the 1,023 videos screened, 269 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. For each video, the authors recorded the number of views, likes, and comments; the length; and the video upload source. The Comprehensiveness Assessment Tool for Pressure Injuries, the Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information score, and the Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the comprehensiveness, reliability, and quality of the videos. The mean length of the 269 videos was 6.22 ± 4.62 minutes (range, 0.18-19.47 minutes). Only 14.5% of the videos (n = 39) were uploaded by universities or professional organizations. Most videos included information about PI prevention (69.5%), followed by PI management (27.9%). The mean comprehensiveness score was 2.33 ± 1.32 (range, 1-5). Nearly half of the videos (49.1%) were not reliable. However, the quality of 43.9% of the videos was somewhat useful. The Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information mean scores of universities/professional organizations (P < .001), nonprofit healthcare professionals (P = .015), and independent health information channel videos (P = .026) were higher than the mean score of medical advertising/profit companies channel videos. This study draws attention to the need for more comprehensive, high-quality, and reliable videos about PIs. It is important that videos on YouTube provide comprehensive and reliable information for patients, caregivers, students, or providers seeking information on PI prevention, assessment, and management.

Evaluating the reliability and quality of YouTube videos regarding medial collateral ligament knee injury as a patient education resource

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the educational reliability and quality of videos shared on YouTube regarding medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries of the knee. MethodsUsing the search keywords “medial collateral ligament” on YouTube, the first 50 videos were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Video characteristics were extracted, and each video was categorized by upload source and content type. Three scoring systems were used to evaluate the videos: the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Score to assess a video's reliability; the Global Quality Score (GQS) to assess educational quality; the novel MCL Specific Score (MCL-SS) to assess MCL-specific content quality. Linear regression analyses were conducted to explore relationships between video characteristics and scores. ResultsCollectively, the videos were viewed 5,759,427 times with a mean number of views per video of 115,189 ​± ​177,861. The mean JAMA score was 1.8, GQS was 2.1, and MCL-SS was 5.6, indicating both poor reliability and quality. Only videos uploaded by physicians showed a statistically significantly higher mean MCL-SS (P ​= ​0.032) but were still of low quality with a mean MCL-SS of 9.2 ​± ​5.9. Multivariate linear regression revealed that videos uploaded by physicians were statistically significant predictors of greater MCL-SS (β ​= ​4.108; P ​= ​0.029). Longer video durations were statistically significant predictors of greater GQS (β ​= ​0.001; P ​= ​0.002) and MCL-SS (β ​= ​0.007; P ​< ​0.001). ConclusionsYouTube videos regarding MCL injuries, despite their popularity, were found to be on average having poor overall reliability and quality as measured by JAMA, GQS and MCL-SS. Level of evidenceIII. Study designCross-sectional Study.

YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study

BackgroundYouTube, a widely recognized global video platform, is inaccessible in China, whereas Bilibili and TikTok are popular platforms for long and short videos, respectively. There are many videos related to laryngeal carcinoma on these platforms. This study aims to identify upload sources, contents, and feature information of these videos on YouTube, Bilibili, and TikTok, and further evaluate the video quality.MethodsOn January 1, 2024, we searched the top 100 videos by default sort order (300 videos in total) with the terms “laryngeal carcinoma” and “throat cancer” on YouTube, “喉癌” on Bilibili and TikTok. Videos were screened for relevance and similarity. Video characteristics were documented, and quality was assessed by using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), Global Quality Score (GQS), and modified DISCERN (mDISCERN).ResultsThe analysis included 99 YouTube videos, 76 from Bilibili, and 73 from TikTok. Median video lengths were 193 s (YouTube), 136 s (Bilibili), and 42 s (TikTok). TikTok videos demonstrated higher audience interaction. Bilibili had the lowest ratio of original contents (69.7%). Treatment was the most popular topic on YouTube and Bilibili, while that was the prognosis on TikTok. Solo narration was the most common video style across all platforms. Video uploaders were predominantly non-profit organizations (YouTube), self-media (Bilibili), and doctors (TikTok), with TikTok authors having the highest certification rate (83.3%). Video quality, assessed using PEMAT, VIQI, GQS, and mDISCERN, varied across platforms, with YouTube generally showing the highest scores. Videos from professional authors performed better than videos from non-professionals based on the GQS and mDISCERN scores. Spearman correlation analysis showed no strong relationships between the video quality and the audience interaction.ConclusionsVideos on social media platforms can help the public learn about the knowledge of laryngeal cancer to some extent. TikTok achieves the best flow, but videos on YouTube are of the best quality. However, the video quality across all platforms still needs enhancement. We need more professional uploaders to ameliorate the video quality related to laryngeal carcinoma. Content creators also should be aware of the certification, the originality, and the style of video shooting. As for the platforms, refining the algorithm will allow users to receive more high-quality videos.

YouTube as a Source of Patient Information on External Cephalic Version: Cross-Sectional Study.

With the global increase of cesarean deliveries, breech presentation is the third indication for elective cesarean delivery. Implementation of external cephalic version (ECV), in which the position of the baby is manipulated externally to prevent breech presentation at term, remains suboptimal. Increasing knowledge for caretakers and patients is beneficial in the uptake of ECV implementation. In recent decades, the internet has become the most important source of information for both patients and health care professionals. However, the use and availability of the internet also bring about concerns since the information is often not regulated or reviewed. Information needs to be understandable, correct, and easily obtainable for the patient. Owing to its global reach, YouTube has great potential to both hinder and support spreading medical information and can therefore be used as a tool for shared decision-making. The objective of this study was to investigate the available information on YouTube about ECV and assess the quality and usefulness of the information in the videos. A YouTube search was performed with five search terms and the first 35 results were selected for analysis. A quality assessment scale was developed to quantify the accuracy of medical information of each video. The main outcome measure was the usefulness score, dividing the videos into useful, slightly useful, and not useful categories. The source of upload was divided into five subcategories and two broad categories of medical or nonmedical. Secondary outcomes included audience engagement, misinformation, and encouraging or discouraging ECV. Among the 70 videos, only 14% (n=10) were defined as useful. Every useful video was uploaded by educational channels or health care professionals and 80% (8/10) were derived from a medical source. Over half of the not useful videos were uploaded by birth attendants and vloggers. Videos uploaded by birth attendants scored the highest on audience engagement. The presence of misinformation was low across all groups. Two-thirds of the vloggers encouraged ECV to their viewers. A minor percentage of videos about ECV on YouTube are considered useful. Vloggers often encourage their audience to opt for ECV. Videos with higher audience engagement had a lower usefulness score compared to videos with lower audience engagement. Sources from medically accurate videos should cooperate with sources with high audience engagement to contribute to the uptake of ECV by creating more awareness and a positive attitude of the procedure, thereby lowering the chance for a cesarean delivery due to breech presentation at term.

YouTube™ Videos as a Source of Information on Necrotizing Gingivitis: A Content-Quality Analysis.

Background This study aimsto evaluate the quality, reliability, and content of the information provided in YouTube™ videos on necrotizing gingivitis (NG), demonstrate the effectiveness of the videos for patients, and help dentists use this platform as a resource to properly guide their patients. Methodology This cross-sectional study was conducted by two experienced periodontologists. They began the study by searching for YouTube™ videos using the keywords "necrotizing gingivitis" and "trench mouth."Descriptive parameters such as the source of upload, country of origin, duration, upload date, number of likes, dislikes, views, and comments were evaluated. After this initial evaluation, the viewing rate and interaction index were calculated. Videos were categorized into high content (HC) and low content (LC) based on a 7-point scale. The quality of video content was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI). The data were analyzed using various statistical tests, with a significance level set at p<0.05. Results Initially, 148 videos were screened, and 50 videos on NG that met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Out of the 50 videos, 28 (56%) were uploaded by healthcare professionals. Overall, 68% of videos (n=34) were classified as HCand 32% (n=16) as LC. The most common topic was clinical symptoms and signs of NG, with 86% (n=43), while NG prevention was the least common topic, with 26% (n=13). Statistically significant differences were found between video duration, time since upload, and VIQI scores according to TCS scores (p<0.05). Video duration and VIQI scores were higher for HC videos compared to LC videos. The time since upload for LC videos was higher than for HC videos. Positive correlations were observed between TCS scores, video duration, and VIQI, as well as between GQS scores, video duration, viewing rate, and VIQI. Conclusions The majority of NG videos on YouTube™ are useful and comprehensive, but their number is insufficient. Poor-quality and inadequate videos may mislead practitioners and patients. However, this also presents an opportunity for healthcare professionals to leverage YouTube™ as an educational tool. Periodontologists should upload more comprehensive videos and play a more active role in providing high-quality information.

Evaluation of Alcohol Use Disorder Videos on YouTube: How Current and Reliable Are They Post DSM-5?

Alcohol-related health problems, including emergency admissions, are a significant concern globally. With the rise of internet usage, platforms like YouTube have become key sources of information on alcohol use disorder. This study aimed to evaluate the quality and content of English-language YouTube videos related to alcohol use disorder, utilizing criteria such as the Modified DISCERN scale, Global Quality Scale (GQS), and DSM-5 guidelines. Of the 926 videos initially identified, 506 were included for analysis. Results revealed that while YouTube serves as a valuable educational resource for alcohol-related information, concerns exist regarding the accuracy and reliability of content, with a notable lack of videos uploaded by official institutions. Furthermore, despite the varying quality of videos, no statistically significant difference was observed based on the source of upload. The findings highlight the need for improved algorithms to promote reliable content and greater involvement of official institutions in disseminating accurate information. Educational videos, especially those targeting emergency department patients, have the potential to enhance knowledge and facilitate informed decision-making regarding alcohol-related health issues. However, further research is warranted to assess the effectiveness of such interventions in reducing alcohol-related emergencies and burden on healthcare systems. Addressing these challenges could lead to more effective strategies for mitigating the harmful effects of alcohol misuse on public health.

Evaluation of Turkish videos about breast self-examination on YouTube

Objectives: Breast self-examination (BSE) is very important to early detect breast cancer in women in addition to imaging methods. The easiest way to access information concerning how to perform this examination is undoubtedly the internet, and the most popular platform is YouTube. However, the most important disadvantage of this massive platform is the risk of spreading false information since it cannot be audited. This study aimed to evaluate Turkish videos on BSE on YouTube in terms of quality and content. Methods: On January 17, 2022, a search was conducted on YouTube using the keyword “breast self-examination”, and the first 210 videos presented on the first five pages were obtained. After applying the study criteria, 156 were included in the sample and evaluated by two general surgeons in terms of educational value, content, and upload source. Results: Of the 156 videos, 23 were categorized as useful (14.7%) and 133 as misleading (85.3%). When examined according to the upload source group, universities/professional organizations/non-profit physicians/physicians had the highest rate of misleading videos (96.9%), while stand-alone health information websites had the highest rate of useful videos (24%). There was no significant difference between the upload sources in terms of video length, number of views, content score, or quality score. Conclusions: The number of useful Turkish videos on BSE is very low. Our results indicate the need for more educational and useful videos to be produced, especially by healthcare professionals who use the YouTube platform.

Gynecomastia Surgery Patient Education: An Information Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos.

YouTube is a platform for many topics, including plastic surgery. Previous studies have shown poor educational value in YouTube videos of plastic surgery procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality and accuracy of YouTube videos concerning gynecomastia surgery (GS). The phrases "gynecomastia surgery" (GS) and "man boobs surgery" (MB) were queried on YouTube. The first 50 videos for each search term were examined. The videos were rated using our novel Gynecomastia Surgery Specific Score to measure gynecomastia-specific information, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) to measure understandability and actionability, and the Global Quality Scale to measure general quality. The most common upload source was a board-certified plastic surgeon (35%), and content category was surgery techniques and consultations (51%). Average scores for the Global Quality Scale (x̄ = 2.25), Gynecomastia Surgery Specific Score (x̄ = 3.50), and PEMAT Actionability (x̄ = 44.8%) were low, whereas PEMAT Understandability (x̄ = 77.4%) was moderate to high. There was no difference in all scoring modalities between the GS and MB groups. Internationally uploaded MB videos tended to originate from Asian countries, whereas GS videos tended to originate from non-US Western countries. Patient uploaders had higher PEMAT Actionability scores than plastic surgeon uploaders. The quality and amount of gynecomastia-specific information in GS videos on YouTube are low and contain few practical, take-home points for patients. However, understandability is adequate. Plastic surgeons and professional societies should strive to create high-quality medical media on platforms such as YouTube.

ORTOGNATİK CERRAHİ İLE İLGİLİ INSTAGRAM GÖNDERİLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: METODOLOJİK ÇALIŞMA

Objective: The use of social media has increased with the widespread use of the internet. Patients use social media for many reasons, such as to get information about their illness, get social support from other patients, and communicate with doctors. The purpose of this study is to analyze Instagram posts about orthognathic surgery.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: A new Instagram account has been opened so that the outcomes of the searches are not affected by bias. Three hashtags with the most posts about orthognathic surgery were determined. #orthognathicsurgery, #orthodonticsurgery, and #jawsurgery hashtags were classified on Instagram. The first hundred posts for each hashtag were analyzed. The sources of the posts were classified as healthcare professionals, individual users, and healthcare industries. The contents of the posts were categorized as patient experience and educational. &#x0D; Results: In the posts about #orthognaticsurgery, a statistically significant difference was found between the number of likes. According to the upload source, there was no statistically significant difference between the number of comments and number of likes on posts about #orthodonticsurgery and #jawsurgery.&#x0D; Conclusions: Healthcare professionals should point out to patients that Instagram needs to be an adequate resource for patients in its current state.&#x0D; The study results revealed that there needed to be more information about orthognathic surgery for patients on Instagram.