1. Liberal States and the Problem of Calls for DevolutionWe Uve in a world of states: a world in which die dominant form of persisting structure for the wielding of political power is characterized by territorially concentrated power exercised through political institutions that exert sovereign control in the sense of being able to exclusively command compliance.1 Within such a world, calls for reorganization of the way these institutions are organized so as to devolve power to groups oppressed or marginalized within existing structures are inevitable.For proponents of liberal states, such calls for devolving power pose a problem. Proponents of Uberai states are committed to the possibility of reforming or reorganizing states so that die exercise of poUtical power through institutions that encompass the entire territory can rightly command compliance from everyone within its jurisdiction. When substate groups call for a reorganization in which power is devolved rather than reformed, they seem to deny that it is possible for institutions that encompass the entire territory to rightly command compliance from the groups' members at least. Calls for devolution imply that within some portions of the state's territory, or for certain of the state's inhabitants, state-level political institutions cannot rightfully command compliance, or at least, cannot do so exclusively.Proponents of liberal states might respond to this problem by letting go of the need for exclusive command. This would require the development of models of liberal states or other structures for wielding political power that are compatible with a pluraUty of sources of rightful commands for compliance at least some of which are horizontally rather than vertically related. Avery Kolers's theory of territorial rights, Margaret Moore's emphasis of jurisdictional authority, and Ayelet Shachar 's concept of joint governance may be read as steps toward developing such models.2However, for many proponents of liberal states, the prospect of a competing source of rightful command that may assert priority over decision making that applies to the entire territory is impractical, and conceptually difficult to sustain.3 An alternative response, one that preserves the pre-eminent position of institutions that encompass the state's entire territory and population, is to insist that such institutions have a vital role in ensuring that the decision making of sub-state groups meets minimal conditions of moral equality and respect for human rights. Reserving these powers for state officials is argued to be unproblematic insofar as even groups who might legitimately reject state-level political institutions as rightfully commanding compUance in many or even most spheres of life must accept the requirement that policies be developed and applied in a way that preserves individual members' moral equality and respects and secures their basic human rights.4 Given this, state-level political institations may rightfully compel all individuals living within a territory to observe minimal standards of political equality and respect for human rights, even those who may plausibly claim to be exempt from rightful command by such institations in other regards in virtue of their membership in an oppressed or marginalized nonstate group. Regardless of the grounds on which a sub-state group calls for devolution of power, political institations at the level of the state may legitimately compel compliance with directives aimed at securing the moral equaUty and human rights of the group's membership; and so states may legitimately reserve to themselves powers of oversight or remedy in relation to groups calling for power to be devolved.Emphasizing the role of institations that encompass the entire territory in guaranteeing minimal conditions of moral equality and respect for human rights seems promising, but it cannot provide a satisfactory account of the desirability of empowering state officials to exercise powers of oversight, and so it cannot justify reserving such powers in the face of calls for power to be devolved. …