Sonication Fluid Culture Research Articles

Improving the microbiological diagnosis of fracture-related infection and prosthetic joint infection through culturing sonication fluid in Bactec blood culture bottles.

Sonication of surgically removed implants appears to optimize the microbiological diagnosis in orthopedic implant-associated infections (OIAI). However, reports of infection with negative cultures can still reach high rates. A study evaluating the inoculation of sonication fluid into blood culture bottles (SFBCB) in patients with fracture-related infection (FRI) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is necessary. This study compared the accuracy SFBCB over the conventional sonication fluid cultures (CSFC) and tissue culture (TC). Consecutive patients who underwent implant removal surgeries due to any reason had their implants sonicated according to standardized method. Definitions of PJI and FRI were based upon criteria by European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and Metsemakers, respectively. Between three to five intraoperative tissue samples were processed. The implant`s sonication fluid was seeded onto sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, thioglycolate broth and on tryptic soy broth for CSFC, while was also inoculated into blood culture bottles and incubated in the automated system during 5 days for SFBCB. Overall, 74 patients were analyzed, of which 57 with OIAI (48 FRI and 09 PJI) and 17 aseptic failures (03 arthroplasties and 14 osteosynthesis). Interestingly, SFBCB demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity compared to CSFC (96.5% [95% CI, 88-100] vs. 78.9% [95% CI, 66-89], p = 0.004), and to TC (96.5% [95% CI, 88-100], vs. 57.9% [95% CI, 44-71], p < 0.001), whereas there were no significant differences in specificity between the three methods. In comparison to CSFC and TC, SFBCB improved sensitivity for diagnosing OIAI without compromising specificity.

The role of sonication in microbiology culture yield of the explanted infected implants post fracture fixation: A systematic review

Objective To evaluate the role of sonication in cases of postoperative infection following fracture fixation. Methods A systematic review of studies comparing peri-implant tissue culture (PTC) and sonication fluid culture (SFC) from implants removed due to fracture-related infection was conducted. The inclusion criteria were: published in English, human studies, implants from fracture-related infection, and tests comparing the culture of deep tissue and sonication fluid. The quality of studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skill Program (CASP) tool. The sensitivity, specificity, implant preservation mechanism to avoid contamination, cost, and duration of incubation for PTC and SFC were extracted and compared using descriptive statistics. Results Nine studies with a total of 1,144 participants were included. The overall mean sensitivity of SFC and PTC was 88.9% (95% CI: 84.6-92.4%) and 67.8% (95% CI: 60.9-74.2%), respectively. While the specificity of SFC and PTC was 96.2% (95% CI: 94.7-97.4%) and 98.5% (95% CI: 97.7-99.0%), respectively. However, the cost-effectiveness of sonication as a diagnostic method for sonication remains unclear, as only one study estimated the price of sonication to be $228.00 per test, similar to PTC. Conclusions Sonication fluid culture might improve sensitivity in diagnosing postoperative infection following fracture fixation. This technique can potentially enhance the microbiological output and provide valuable guidance to healthcare professionals in treating infection after fracture fixation. However, more high-quality trials are needed to establish its optimal use, especially cost-effectiveness. Registration The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022338190; 18 June 2022).

Evaluating the Clinical Relevance of Routine Sonication for Periprosthetic Hip or Knee Joint Infection Diagnosis.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after joint arthroplasty. PJI screening and conventional cultures may be inconclusive. Sonication fluid culturing stands out as a valuable adjunct technique for PJI diagnosis. This study aims to determine the clinical relevance of routine sonication for all (a)septic revisions. All patients who underwent (partial) hip or knee revision arthroplasty between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We formed three groups based on the European Bone and Joint Society PJI criteria: infection confirmed, likely, and unlikely. We analyzed clinical, laboratory, and radiological screening. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for synovial fluid (preoperative), tissue, and sonication fluid cultures. We determined the clinical relevance of sonication as the percentage of patients for whom sonication confirmed PJI; 429 patients who underwent (partial) revision of hip or knee arthroplasty were included. Sensitivity and specificity were 69% and 99% for synovial fluid cultures, 76% and 92% for tissue cultures, and 80% and 89% for sonication fluid cultures, respectively. Sonication fluid cultures improved tissue culture sensitivity and specificity to 83% and 99%, respectively. In 11% of PJIs, sonication fluid cultures were decisive for diagnosis. This is applicable to acute and chronic infections. Sonication fluid cultures enhanced the sensitivity and specificity of PJI diagnostics. In 11% of PJI cases, causative pathogens were confirmed by sonication fluid culture results. Sonication fluid culture should be performed in all revision arthroplasties.

Role of Dithiothreitol in Detection of Orthopaedic Implant-Associated Infections.

Orthopaedic implant-associated infections (OIAIs) represent a notable complication of contemporary surgical procedures, exerting a considerable impact on patient outcomes and escalating healthcare expenditures. Prompt diagnosis holds paramount importance in managing OIAIs, with sonication widely acknowledged as the preferred method for detecting biofilm-associated infections. Recently, dithiothreitol (DTT) has emerged as a potential substitute for sonication, owing to its demonstrated ability to impede biofilm formation. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of DTT with sonication in identifying microorganisms within implants. Conducted as a prospective cohort investigation, the study encompassed two distinct groups: patients with suspected infections undergoing implant removal (Group A) and those slated for hardware explantation (Group B). Hardware segments were assessed for biofilm-related microorganisms using both sonication and DTT, with a comparative analysis of the two methods. A total of 115 patients were enrolled. In Group A, no statistically significant disparity was observed between DTT and sonication. DTT exhibited a sensitivity of 89.47% and specificity of 96.3%. Conversely, in Group B, both DTT and sonication fluid cultures yielded negative results in all patients. Consequently, this investigation suggests that DTT holds comparable efficacy to sonication in detecting OIAIs, offering a novel, cost-effective, and readily accessible diagnostic modality for identifying implant-associated infections.

Evaluation of Sonicate Fluid Culture Cutoff Points for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis.

Implant sonication is useful for recovery of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) pathogens in culture, but exact cutoff points for definition of clinically significant sonicate fluid culture results vary from study to study. The aim of this study was to define ideal sonicate fluid culture cutoff points for PJI diagnosis. Sonicate fluid cultures from hip and knee prosthesis components removed between February 2007 and December 2020 were studied. Prosthesis components were placed in solid containers in the operating room; in the clinical microbiology laboratory, 400 mL Ringer's solution was added, and containers subjected to vortexing, sonication and then vortexing, followed by centrifugation. Concentrated sonicate fluid was plated on aerobic and anaerobic solid media, and culture results reported semiquantitatively, as no growth, <20, 20-50, 51-100, or >100 CFU/10 mL sonicate fluid. Sonicate cultures from cement spacers and cultures yielding more than 1 microorganism were excluded. Sensitivity and specificity of each cutoff point was evaluated. A total of 1448 sonicate fluid cultures were evaluated, 68% from knees and 32% from hips. PJI was present in 644 (44%) cases. Sensitivity of sonicate culture was 75.0% at <20 CFU/10 mL, 55.3% at ≥20 CFU/10 mL, 46.9% at >51 CFU/10 mL, and 39.8% at >100 CFU/10 mL. Specificity was 78.2%, 99.8%, 100%, and 100%, at the 4 cutoff points, respectively. A cutoff point for sonicate fluid culture positivity of ≥20 CFU/10 mL is suitable for PJI diagnosis.

The microbiology of periprosthetic joint infections as revealed by sonicate cultures in Korea: Routine use of fungal and mycobacterial cultures is necessary?

Although sonication is a valuable diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), it is not commonly utilized. We analyzed sonicate and intraoperative tissue culture results obtained from three hospitals to define the microbial etiology of PJIs in Korea. Furthermore, we investigated necessity of conducting regular fungal and mycobacterial cultures. We retrospectively analyzed data for patients with suspected orthopedic-related infections between 2017 and 2022, who had undergone prostheses removal surgery. We included 193 patients with suspected PJIs, and bacterial (n = 193), fungal (n = 193), and mycobacterial (n = 186) cultures were conducted on both sonicate and intraoperative tissue samples. The diagnosis of PJI was based on the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. Out of 193 patients, 121 (62.7%) had positive sonicate cultures, while 112 (58.0%) had positive periprosthetic tissue cultures. According to EBJIS criteria, a total of 181 patients were diagnosed with PJI, and 141 patients received microbiological confirmation through sonicate fluid culture or tissue culture. Of the 181 patients, 28 were classified with acute PJI (within 3 months of implantation) and 153 with chronic PJI. Among 141 patients, staphylococci were the most common organisms, accounting for 51.8% of cases, followed by Gram-negative organisms (15.6%), fungus (8.5%), and mycobacteria (3.5%). Nearly 91.7% of fungal isolates were Candida species, which also grew in bacterial cultures. In total, 11 cases cultured positive only in tissue culture, whereas 20 cases cultured positive only in sonicate culture. The antibiotic treatment plans were adjusted according to culture results. Utilizing sonicate culture has greatly assisted in identifying pathogens responsible for chronic indolent PJIs, allowing suitable antimicrobial treatment. Based on few cases involving non-Candida and mycobacterial infections, it appears that routine fungal and mycobacterial cultures may not be necessary.

The value of sonication on orthopaedic implants in an everyday clinical setting – an exploratory study

BackgroundSonication of removed orthopaedic implants in suspected implant-associated infections (IAI) is widely applied internationally. However, evaluation of the utility of sonication on all implants removed in everyday standard practice is scarce. This exploratory study was performed to evaluate the application of sonication fluid (SF) culture on removed orthopaedic implants, irrespective of the reason for removal.MethodsOut of 100 removed orthopaedic implants collected between August 2019 and September 2020, 77 implants with availability of concurrent tissue culture samples were included in the study. Removed implants were categorized into a confirmed or suspected IAI group and a presumed aseptic group based on pre-operative diagnosis by the responsible surgeon. Implants were sonicated and SF culture performed under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The significance of all bacterial isolates was evaluated based on the CFU/mL cut-offs of the EBJIS guidelines, except for C. acnes where additional investigations were performed.ResultsThe results of SF culture in the two groups were compared with their corresponding tissue cultures. Out of the 12 cases in the confirmed/suspected IAI group, SF culture was positive in 11 cases and had increased diagnostic yield in two (17%) cases compared to tissue culture. Increased diagnostic yield of SF compared to tissue culture was seen in seven (11%) of the 65 implants in the presumed aseptic group. If growth of Cutibacterium species isolates were interpreted based on EBJIS cut-off for SF culture instead of the study-specific criteria, then two isolates considered to represent infection might have been missed while three other isolates considered contaminants would have fallen under the ‘infection confirmed’ category in the EBJIS guidelines.ConclusionSonication with SF culture has increased diagnostic yield compared to tissue cultures in all implants irrespective of reason for removal. However, positive SF cultures with Cutibacterium species should always be interpreted with extreme care.

Is an isolated positive sonication fluid culture in revision arthroplasties clinically relevant?

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of an isolated positive sonication fluid culture (SFC) in patients who underwent revision surgery of a prosthetic joint. We hypothesized that cases with a positive SFC have a higher rate of infection during follow-up compared with controls with a negative SFC. MethodsThis retrospective multicentre observational study was performed within the European Study Group of Implant-Associated Infections. All patients who underwent revision surgery of a prosthetic joint between 2013 and 2019 and had a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. Patients with positive tissue cultures or synovial fluid cultures were excluded from the study. ResultsA total of 95 cases (positive SFC) and 201 controls (negative SFC) were included. Infection during follow-up occurred in 12 of 95 cases (12.6%) versus 14 of 201 controls (7.0%) (p = 0.125). In all, 79.8% of cases were with treated with antibiotics (76/95). Of the non-treated cases, 89% (17/19) had a positive SFC with a low virulent microorganism. When solely analysing patients who were not treated with antibiotics, 16% of the cases (3/19) had an infection during follow-up versus 5% of the controls (9/173) (p = 0.08). DiscussionAlthough not statistically significant, infections were almost twice as frequent in patients with an isolated positive SFC. These findings require further exploration in larger trials and to conclude about the potential benefit of antibiotic treatment in these cases.

Staphylococcus aureus Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Vascular Polyester Grafts are Inhibited In Vitro by Triclosan

This study evaluated Staphylococcus aureus adhesion and biofilm formation on vascular grafts, which has seldom been investigated. Adhesion and biofilm formation capabilities of three methicillin susceptible S.aureus strains (one biofilm forming reference strain and two clinical isolates) on five different vascular biomaterials were evaluated invitro, including polyester (P), P+ gelatin (PG), P+ collagen (PC), PC+ silver (PCS), and PCS+ triclosan (PCST). Staphylococcus aureus adhesion on grafts was evaluated after one hour of culture and biofilm formation after 24 hours of culture by four different methods: spectrophotometry after crystal violet staining; sonicate fluid culture; metabolic assay; and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Optical density was compared using Mann-Whitney pairwise test, and bacterial counts using Wilcoxon pairwise test. PCST grafts were most efficient in preventing S.aureus adhesion and biofilm formation, regardless of the method used. Bacterial counts and metabolic activity were significantly lower on PCST grafts after 24 hours (5.65 vs. 9.24 [PCS], 8.99 [PC], 8.82 [PG], and 10.44 log10 CFU/mL [P]; p < .015), and only PCST grafts were bactericidal. Biofilm formation was significantly diminished on PCST grafts compared with all other grafts (p < .001). Bacterial viability and metabolic activity after 24 hours were more impaired on PG compared with PC graft, and were surprisingly higher on PCS compared with PC grafts. Biofilm biomass formed after exposure to P, PG, PC, and PCS grafts was also reduced after 24 hours of incubation with PCST grafts (p < .001). After 24 hours, few bacteria were visible by SEM on PCST grafts, whereas bacterial biofilm colonies were clearly identified on other graft surfaces. Triclosan impregnated PCST grafts appeared to interfere with S.aureus adhesion from early stages of biofilm formation invitro. Silver impregnation was not efficient in preventing biofilm formation, and collagen coating promoted S.aureus biofilm formation more than gelatin coating.

A prospective study to identify preoperative serum parameters for spinal implant infection detected by sonication fluid culture.

Low-virulent microorganisms identified on pedicle screws by sonication fluid culture (SFC) are an important cause of implant loosening. While sonication of explanted material improves the detection rate, the risk of contamination exists and no standardized diagnostic criteria for chronic low-grade spinal implant-related infection (CLGSII) are stablished. Besides, the role of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in CLGSII has not been adequately investigated. Blood samples were collected prior to implant removal. To increase sensitivity, the explanted screws were sonicated and processed separately. Patients exhibiting at least one positive SFC were classified in the infection group (loose criteria). To increase specificity, the strict criteria only considered multiple positive SFC (≥ 3 implants and/or ≥ 50% of explanted devices) as meaningful for CLGSII. Factors which might promote implant infection were also recorded. Thirty-six patients and 200 screws were included. Among them, 18 (50%) patients had any positive SFCs (loose criteria), whereas 11 (31%) patients fulfilled the strict criteria for CLGSII. Higher serum protein level was the most accurate marker for the preoperative detection of CLGSSI, exhibiting an area under the curve of 0.702 (loose criteria) and 0.819 (strict criteria) for the diagnosis of CLGSII. CRP only exhibited a modest accuracy, whereas PCT was not a reliable biomarker. Patient history (spinal trauma, ICU hospitalization and/or previous wound-related complications) increased the likelihood of CLGSII. Markers of systemic inflammation (serum protein level) and patient history should be employed to stratify preoperative risk of CLGSII and decide the best treatment strategy.

Diagnostic accuracy of sonication fluid cultures from prosthetic components in periprosthetic joint infection: an updated diagnostic meta-analysis

BackgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most serious complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and has a significant impact on patients and the national healthcare system. To date, the diagnosis of PJI is still confronted with dilemmas. The present study investigated the validity of sonication fluid culture (SFC) for removing implants in the diagnosis of PJI after joint replacement.MethodsFrom database establishment to December 2020, relevant literature was retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers independently performed quality assessment and data extraction to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), area under the curve (AUC) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) to evaluate the diagnostic value of overall SFC for PJI.ResultsA total of 38 eligible studies including 6302 patients were selected in this study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR of SFC for PJI diagnosis were 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.79), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95–0.96), 18.68 (95% CI, 11.92–29.28), 0.24 (95% CI, 0.21–0.29), and 85.65 (95% CI, 56.46–129.94), respectively, while the AUC was 0.92.ConclusionThis meta-analysis showed that SFC was of great value in PJI diagnosis, and the evidence of SFC on PJI was more favorable but not yet strong. Therefore, improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of SFC is still necessary, and the diagnosis of PJI continues to warrant a multiplex approach before and during a revision procedure.

Direct Prosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis from Sonication Fluid Inoculated in Blood Culture Bottles by Direct MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

An accurate and fast microbiological diagnosis is key for a proper management and results when facing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study is to assess the role of direct Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) for early identification of the pathogens causing PJI from sonication fluid inoculated in blood culture bottles (BCB-SF). This prospective multicentric study included 107 consecutive patients from February 2016 to February 2017. Among them, 71 prosthetic joint revision surgeries were undergone for aseptic and 36 for septic reasons. Prostheses were sonicated and the resulting fluid inoculated into blood culture bottles, regardless the suspicion for infection. We assessed the diagnostic performance of direct MALDI-TOF MS identification of the pathogens in BCB-SF and compared it with periprosthetic tissue and conventional sonication fluid cultures. The sensitivity of direct MALDI-TOF MS of BCB-SF (69%) was higher compared to conventional sonication fluid (69% vs. 64%, p > 0.05) or intraoperative tissue cultures (69% vs. 53%, p = 0.04), especially for patients receiving antimicrobial treatment. This approach also reduced the time for identification but the specificity was compromised (100% vs. 94%) and polymicrobial infections were missed. In conclusion, BCB-SF improves the sensitivity and reduces the time of PJI diagnosis when used in combination with conventional cultures under strict sterility conditions.

The Function of Sonication in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a serious adverse event. Culturing of samples of periprosthetic tissue is the standard technique utilized for the microbiological diagnosis of PJI. However, this technique is neither sensitive nor specific since in PJI the microorganisms are usually in a biofilm on the surface of the prosthesis. The objective of this paper is to know the role of sonication in the diagnosis of PJI after TKA. Sonication consists in taking samples of bacteria from biofilms adhered to the prosthetic surface. The reported sensitivity for the diagnosis of PJI of the periprosthetic tissue cultures and sonicate fluid cultures is 54% and 75%, apiece. The specificity is 98% and 87%, respectively. In conclusion, the sonication technique is a dependable test for the diagnosis of PJI after TKA with a greater sensitivity and specificity than the conventional periprosthetic tissue cultures. Sonication of polyethylene liners, rather than the whole prosthesis, has been reported to be sufficient for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

Targeted Versus Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing-based Detection of Microorganisms in Sonicate Fluid for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly used for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis, but its clinical utility is poorly defined. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing (sNGS) has been reported to identify PJI pathogens undetected by culture in sonicate fluid. However, sNGS is complex and costly. Here, 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene-based targeted metagenomic sequencing (tNGS) was compared to sNGS of sonicate fluid for microbial detection and identification in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. A convenience sample of sonicate fluids derived from patients who had undergone THA or TKA removal, enriched with culture negative PJI cases, was tested. Samples had been previously tested by sNGS. For tNGS, samples were extracted, amplified by polymerase chain reaction targeting the V1 to V3 regions of the 16S rRNA gene, and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq. A total of 395 sonicate fluids, including 208 from subjects with PJI, were studied. Compared with sonicate fluid culture, tNGS had higher positive percent agreement (72.1 vs 52.9%, P < .001), detecting potential pathogens in 48.0% of culture-negative PJIs. There was no difference between the positive percent agreement of tNGS (72.1%) and sNGS (73.1%, P = .83). 16S rRNA gene-based tNGS is a potential diagnostic tool for PJI pathogen identification in sonicate fluid from failed THAs and TKAs in culture-negative cases, with similar performance characteristics to sNGS.

Assessment of Microbiological and Clinical Findings of Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty Performed Due to Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Two-stage revision arthroplasty remains the main surgical strategy for the treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Sonicate fluid culture has improved sensitivity compared to standard periprosthetic tissue culture, but its usefulness is questionable during the second stage of revision arthroplasty. Twenty-seven patients with prosthetic joint infection were investigated. Tissue and sonicate fluid cultures were examined to detect bacteria on the removed spacer during the second stage of exchange arthroplasty. Microbiological findings were analyzed and patients were assessed within an average of 5 years follow up. Tissue cultures in second-stage revision arthroplasties were positive in 6/27 cases (22.2%) growing CNS in 4 cases (14.8%), Staphylococcus aureus in 1 case (3.7%), and Enterococcus faecalis in 1 case (3.7%). In 3 cases (11.1%) infection was identified as a result of a sonication procedure. Clinical failures at final follow-up were recorded in 4 (14.8%) patients, with reinfection noted in 3 of them. Arthrodesis and spacer exchange followed by suppressive antibiotic therapy were performed in 2 cases. 1. Tissue cultures remain the gold standard in diagnosis of PIJ although a negative culture does not rule out the presence of bacteria on spacers removed during second stage revision for PJI. 2. Sonication appears to have limited ability to detect persistent infection before reimplantation and was not associated with recurrent infection; however, it can be considered a complementary method that could make it possible to identify new microorganisms and facilitate the selection of appropriate treatment options. 3. The positive results of sonication should be interpreted as the detection of actual pathogens in the light of the clinical, microbiological and histopathological data, especially for patients with immunodeficiency.

Tissue sampling is non-inferior in comparison to sonication in orthopedic revision surgery.

The aim of this study was to assess the role of sonication fluid cultures in detecting musculoskeletal infections in orthopedic revision surgery in patients suspected of having peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI), fracture-related infections (FRI), or postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII). Between 2016 and 2019, 149 cases with a data set including sonication fluid cultures and tissue specimen and histological analysis were included. Accuracy of each diagnostic tool as well as the influence of antibiotic therapy was analyzed. Pathogens identified in the sonication cultures and in the associated tissue samples were compared based on the matching ofthe antibiograms. Therapeutic benefits were then assessed. Of 149 cases, 43.6% (n = 65) were identified as PJI, 2.7% (n = 4) as FRI, 12.8% (n = 19) as PSII, 6.7% (n = 10) as aseptic non-union, and 34.2% (n = 51) as aseptic implant loosening. The sensitivity and specificity of tissue and synovial specimens showed no significant difference with respect to sonication fluid cultures (sensitivity/specificity: tissue: 68.2%/96.7%; sonication fluid cultures: 60.2%/98.4%). The administration of antibiotics over 14days prior to microbiological sampling (n = 40) resulted in a lower sensitivity of 42.9% each. Histological analysis showed a sensitivity 86.3% and specificity of 97.4%. In 83.9% (n = 125) of the cases, the results of sonication fluid cultures and tissue specimens were identical. Different microorganisms were found in only four cases. In 17 cases, tissue samples (n = 5) or sonication (n = 12) were false-negatives. Sonication fluid culture showed no additional benefit compared to conventional microbiological diagnostics of tissue and synovial fluid cultures. Preoperative administration of antibiotics had a clearly negative effect on microbiologic test accuracy. In over 83.9% of the cases, sonication fluid and tissue cultures showed identical results. In the other cases, sonication fluid culture did not further contribute to the therapy decision, whereas other factors, such as fistulas, cell counts, or histological analysis, were decisive in determining therapy.

Positivity Trends of Bacterial Cultures from Cases of Acute and Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Background: There is no clear distinction in the literature regarding the positivity trends of bacterial cultures in acute and chronic prosthetic joint infections. Methods: We prospectively included in this study all consecutive patients, aged over 18 years, that were hospitalized from September 2016 through December 2019, that underwent a joint arthroplasty revision surgery. Results: Forty patients were included in our analysis, 11 acute/acute hematogenous and 29 chronic PJIs. We were able to identify all strains of acute/acute hematogenous PJIs within 3 days, whereas this took 8 days for chronic PJIs. Sonication fluid cultures increased the positivity rate and helped in identifying rare pathogens such as Ralstonia pickettii from chronic PJIs, but also increased the number of identified strains from acute PJIs. Culturing synovial fluid in our study did not seem to have a clear benefit compared to sonication fluid and periprosthetic tissue cultures. Conclusion: There was a different positivity trend in bacterial cultures. Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy can be re-evaluated after 3 days for acute PJIs. A prolonged incubation time, especially in the case of chronic PJIs, is mandatory; however, extending the incubation period beyond 14 days would not further improve the ability to identify microorganisms.

Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool for the Detection of Phylotypes of Cutibacterium acnes in Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infections.

The diagnosis of orthopedic implant-associated infections (OIAIs) caused by the slow-growing anaerobic bacterium Cutibacterium acnes is challenging. The mild clinical presentations of this low-virulent bacterium along with its ubiquitous presence on human skin and human-dominated environments often make it difficult to differentiate true infection from contamination. Previous studies have applied C. acnes phylotyping as a potential avenue to distinguish contamination from infection; several studies reported a prevalence of phylotypes IB [corresponding to type H in the single-locus sequence typing (SLST) scheme] and II (SLST type K) in OIAIs, while a few others found phylotype IA1 (more specifically SLST type A) to be abundant. However, phylotype determination has mainly been done in a culture-dependent manner on randomly selected C. acnes isolates. Here, we used a culture-independent amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (aNGS) approach to determine the presence and relative abundances of C. acnes phylotypes in clinical OIAI specimens. As amplicon, the SLST target was used, a genomic fragment that is present in all C. acnes strains known to date. The aNGS approach was applied to 30 sonication fluid (SF) samples obtained from implants removed during revision surgeries, including 17 C. acnes culture-positive and 13 culture-negative SF specimens. In 53% of the culture-positive samples, SLST types were identified: relative abundances were highest for K-type C. acnes, followed by H- and D-type C. acnes. Other types, including A- and C-type C. acnes that are more prevalent on human skin, had low relative abundances. The aNGS results were compared with, and confirmed by a culture-dependent approach, which included the isolation, whole genome sequencing (WGS) and phylotyping of 36 strains of C. acnes obtained from these SF samples. Besides serving as a powerful adjunct to identify C. acnes phylotypes, the aNGS approach could also distinguish mono- from heterotypic infections, i.e., infections caused by more than one phylotype of C. acnes: in eight out of nine culture-positive SF samples multiple C. acnes types were detected. We propose that the aNGS approach, along with the patient’s clinical information, tissue and SF cultures and WGS, could help differentiate C. acnes contamination from true infection.

Inoculation of sonicate fluid into blood culture bottles improves microbial detection in patients with orthopedic bone and soft tissue infections of the upper and lower extremities

BackgroundThe usefulness of sonicate fluid culture for biological tissues in orthopedic bone and soft tissue infections have not been reported. We assessed whether inoculating the sonicate fluid of bone and soft tissue into a blood culture bottle could increase the diagnostic accuracy for biofilm-related orthopedic infections. MethodsTwenty consecutive patients with infections (9 purulent arthritis, 4 osteomyelitis, 4 purulent tenosynovitis, 2 purulent bursitis, and 1 cellulitis) and 10 non-infected cases (6 carpal tunnel syndrome, 3 Dupuytren contracture, and 1 soft tissue tumor) between October 2018 and December 2020 were evaluated prospectively. We analyzed a total of 107 culture submissions (87 bone and tissue specimens and 20 controls); 42 intraoperative tissue specimens (32 infected samples and 10 non-infected samples) using the conventional method, 45 sonication samples (35 infected samples and 10 non-infected samples), and 20 control samples. Intraoperative infectious tissues were cultured using sonicate fluid culture in a blood culture bottle (SFC-CB). The applications of SFC-CB and the conventional culture method and the detection rate, sensitivity, and relationship between the sensitivity of the diagnostic methods and duration of administered preoperative antibiotics were assessed. ResultsThe causative microorganism was detected only by SFC-CB in five patients (25%). The sensitivity (85% vs. 60%; P = 0.077) and detection rate (80% vs. 60%; P = 0.065) were higher for SFC-CB than for the conventional culture method. The sensitivity of SFC-CB was significantly higher than that of the conventional culture method in cases in which preoperative antibiotics were administered for more than 1 week (77% vs. 39%; P = 0.047). ConclusionsUsing SFC-CB, the diagnostic accuracy for bone and soft tissue infection was significantly improved. As biofilms are readily formed in biological tissues, sonication may also be useful for diagnosis. SFC-CB was particularly useful for cases in which preoperative antibiotics were administered.

The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive.

In the absence of a gold standard criterion for diagnosing prosthetic joint infections (PJI), sonication of the removed implant may provide superior microbiological identification to synovial fluid and peri-implant tissue cultures. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the role of sonication culture compared to tissue cultures for diagnosing PJI, using different consensus and international guidelines for PJI definition. Data of 146 patients undergoing removal of hip or knee arthroplasties between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM-2018), Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and a modified clinical criterion, were used to compare the performance of microbiological tests. McNemar´s test and proportion comparison were employed to calculate p-value. Overall, 56% (82/146) were diagnosed with PJI using the clinical criteria. Out of these cases, 57% (47/82) tested positive on tissue culture and 93% (76/82) on sonication culture. Applying this clinical criterion, the sensitivity of sonication fluid and tissue cultures was 92.7% (95% CI: 87.1%- 98.3%) and 57.3% (95% CI: 46.6%-68.0%) (p<0.001), respectively. When both methods were combined for diagnosis (sonication and tissue cultures) sensitivity reached 96.3% (95% CI: 91.5%-100%). Sonication culture and the combination of sonication with tissue cultures, showed higher sensitivity rates than tissue cultures alone for all diagnostic criteria (ICM-18, MSIS, IDSA and EBJIS) applied. Conversely, tissue culture provided greater specificity than sonication culture for all the criteria assessed, except for the EBJIS criteria, in which sonication and tissue cultures specificity was 100% and 95.3% (95% CI: 87.8-100%), respectively (p = 0.024). In a context where diagnostic criteria available have shortcomings and tissue cultures remain the gold standard, sonication cultures can aid PJI diagnosis, especially when diagnostic criteria are inconclusive due to some important missing data (joint puncture, histology).