Somatic L1 Insertions Research Articles

Abstract 1462: Oncogenic activation of FOXR2 driven by somatic acquisition of a LINE-1 promoter in pediatric high-grade glioma

Abstract Long Interspersed Element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) is the only autonomously active mobile genetic element in the human genome. It has been shown to mobilize (i.e., retrotranspose) in cancers, causing de novo somatic L1 insertions. Somatic L1 retrotransposition can cause aberrant splicing of tumor suppressor genes by utilizing cryptic splice donor (SD) sites such as the nucleotide 97 SD in the L1 5’UTR or disrupting repressive regulatory regions of proto-oncogenes, inducing aberrant activation, leading to cancer. In contrast to these reported mechanisms, here we report the first evidence of a driver oncogene activation due to somatic acquisition of an L1 promoter in a pediatric high-grade glioma (HGG). While investigating activation of FOXR2 (forkhead box R2), a known oncogene in CNS embryonal tumors, in a recurrent pediatric diffuse HGG that showed a methylation profile of CNS FOXR2-activated tumors, we identified overexpression of a non-canonical FOXR2 isoform. Transcription of FOXR2 initiated from ~11kb upstream of exon 2 at a site harboring a somatic structural variation (SV) reminiscent of an L1 insertion. Targeted PCR amplification and subsequent PacBio sequencing revealed a 5’ inverted/deleted L1 insertion (~3kb sequence) containing an intact L1 5’UTR, presence of a 3’ transduction sequence, two poly-A tails, and target site duplications. The 3’ transduction sequence matches the sequence downstream an intact polymorphic full-length L1 element at 6p24.1, the likely source L1 element that initiated the FOXR2 somatic insertion. Strikingly, tumor RNA-seq data reveals FOXR2 transcription initiated from the intact sense pol-II promoter of the inserted L1 5’UTR, generating a fusion transcript joining the L1 5’UTR 97 SD to a canonical splice acceptor within exon 2 of FOXR2. Targeted bisulfite sequencing of the FOXR2 L1 5’UTR revealed a hypomethylated state, further supporting its role in FOXR2 transcription initiation. FOXR2 activation is likely a tumor initiating event as the following was observed in the primary tumor that occurred two years prior: a matching recurrent tumor methylation profile, the presence of L1/FOXR2 fusion transcripts, and overexpression of FOXR2. Additional driver mutations, clonal TP53 R175H mutation and PDGFRA amplification, identified in the recurrent tumor but absent in the primary tumor, support the somatic L1 insertion as a tumor initiating event occurring prior to later acquired alterations. Our data represent the first example of oncogenic activation by L1 “promoter donation” via somatic retrotransposition as a novel tumor initiating mechanism. Future large-scale research and development of new computational methods for detecting rearranged L1 insertions are required to determine the prevalence of L1 “promoter donation” in cancer or other diseases. Citation Format: Xiaolong Chen, Diane A. Flasch, Bensheng Ju, Heather L. Mulder, John Easton, Lu Wang, Suzanne J. Baker, Jason Chiang, Jinghui Zhang. Oncogenic activation of FOXR2 driven by somatic acquisition of a LINE-1 promoter in pediatric high-grade glioma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1462.

Machine learning reveals bilateral distribution of somatic L1 insertions in human neurons and glia.

Retrotransposons can cause somatic genome variation in the human nervous system, which is hypothesized to have relevance to brain development and neuropsychiatric disease. However, the detection of individual somatic mobile element insertion (MEIs) presents a difficult signal-to-noise problem. Using a machine learning method (RetroSom) and deep whole genome sequencing, we analyzed L1 and Alu retrotransposition in sorted neurons and glia from human brains. We characterized two brain-specific L1 insertions in neurons and glia from a donor with schizophrenia. There was anatomical distribution of the L1 insertions in neurons and glia across both hemispheres, indicating retrotransposition occurred during early embryogenesis. Both insertions were within the introns of genes (CNNM2, FRMD4A) within genomic loci associated with neuropsychiatric disorders. Proof-of-principle experiments revealed these L1 insertions significantly reduced gene expression. These results demonstrate RetroSom has broad applications for studies of brain development and may provide insight into the possible pathological effects of somatic retrotransposition.

Aberrantly High Levels of Somatic LINE-1 Expression and Retrotransposition in Human Neurological Disorders.

Retrotransposable elements (RTEs) have actively multiplied over the past 80 million years of primate evolution, and as a consequence, such elements collectively occupy ∼ 40% of the human genome. As RTE activity can have detrimental effects on the human genome and transcriptome, silencing mechanisms have evolved to restrict retrotransposition. The brain is the only known somatic tissue where RTEs are de-repressed throughout the life of a healthy human and each neuron in specific brain regions accumulates up to ∼13.7 new somatic L1 insertions (and perhaps more). However, even higher levels of somatic RTE expression and retrotransposition have been found in a number of human neurological disorders. This review is focused on how RTE expression and retrotransposition in neuronal tissues might contribute to the initiation and progression of these disorders. These disorders are discussed in three broad and sometimes overlapping categories: 1) disorders such as Rett syndrome, Aicardi-Goutières syndrome, and ataxia–telangiectasia, where expression/retrotransposition is increased due to mutations in genes that play a role in regulating RTEs in healthy cells, 2) disorders such as autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, and substance abuse disorders, which are thought to be caused by a combination of genetic and environmental stress factors, and 3) disorders associated with age, such as frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and normal aging, where there is a time-dependent accumulation of neurological degeneration, RTE copy number, and phenotypes. Research has revealed increased levels of RTE activity in many neurological disorders, but in most cases, a clear causal link between RTE activity and these disorders has not been well established. At the same time, even if increased RTE activity is a passenger and not a driver of disease, a detrimental effect is more likely than a beneficial one. Thus, a better understanding of the role of RTEs in neuronal tissues likely is an important part of understanding, preventing, and treating these disorders.

Immune signatures correlate with L1 retrotransposition in gastrointestinal cancers.

Long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) retrotransposons are normally suppressed in somatic tissues mainly due to DNA methylation and antiviral defense. However, the mechanism to suppress L1s may be disrupted in cancers, thus allowing L1s to act as insertional mutagens and cause genomic rearrangement and instability. Whereas the frequency of somatic L1 insertions varies greatly among individual tumors, much remains to be learned about underlying genetic, cellular, or environmental factors. Here, we report multiple correlates of L1 activity in stomach, colorectal, and esophageal tumors through an integrative analysis of cancer whole-genome and matched RNA-sequencing profiles. Clinical indicators of tumor progression, such as tumor grade and patient age, showed positive association. A potential L1 expression suppressor, TP53, was mutated in tumors with frequent L1 insertions. We characterized the effects of somatic L1 insertions on mRNA splicing and expression, and demonstrated an increased risk of gene disruption in retrotransposition-prone cancers. In particular, we found that a cancer-specific L1 insertion in an exon of MOV10, a key L1 suppressor, caused exon skipping and decreased expression of the affected allele due to nonsense-mediated decay in a tumor with a high L1 insertion load. Importantly, tumors with high immune activity, for example, those associated with Epstein–Barr virus infection or microsatellite instability, tended to carry a low number of L1 insertions in genomes with high expression levels of L1 suppressors such as APOBEC3s and SAMHD1. Our results indicate that cancer immunity may contribute to genome stability by suppressing L1 retrotransposition in gastrointestinal cancers.

Abstract 5755: Cancer immunity contributes to genome stability by suppressing L1 retrotransposition in gastrointestinal cancers

Abstract Long interspersed nuclear element-1 (L1) retrotransposons are normally suppressed in somatic tissues, mainly by DNA methylation and antiviral defense. However, L1s can be de-suppressed in cancers to act as insertional mutagens and cause genomic instability by creating DNA double-strand breaks and chromosomal rearrangements. Whereas the frequency of somatic L1 insertions varies greatly among individual tumors, much remains to be learned about underlying genetic, cellular, or environmental factors. Here, our pan-gastrointestinal cancer genome analyses for stomach, colorectal, and esophageal tumors identified multiple correlates of L1 activity. Clinical indicators of tumor progression, such as tumor grade and patient age, showed positive association. Potential L1 expression suppressors such as TP53 and DNMT1, a DNA methyltransferase, were inactivated in tumors with frequent L1 insertions. Importantly, tumors with high immune activity, for example, due to viral infection or high tumor-antigen load, tended to carry a low number of L1 insertions in their genomes with high expression levels of L1 suppressors such as APOBEC3s and SAMHD1. Our analysis of the transcriptional effects of intragenic retrotransposon insertions demonstrated an increased risk of gene disruption in retrotransposition-prone cancers. In particular, we found a splicing-disrupting L1 insertion in an exon of MOV10, a key L1 suppressor, which caused exon skipping with evidence of nonsense-mediated decay in a tumor with a high L1 insertion load. Our results indicate that cancer immunity may contribute to genome stability by suppressing L1 retrotransposition, particularly in gastrointestinal cancers. Citation Format: Hyunchul Jung, Jung Kyoon Choi, Eunjung Alice Lee. Cancer immunity contributes to genome stability by suppressing L1 retrotransposition in gastrointestinal cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5755.

L1 retrotransposition is a common feature of mammalian hepatocarcinogenesis.

The retrotransposon Long Interspersed Element 1 (LINE-1 or L1) is a continuing source of germline and somatic mutagenesis in mammals. Deregulated L1 activity is a hallmark of cancer, and L1 mutagenesis has been described in numerous human malignancies. We previously employed retrotransposon capture sequencing (RC-seq) to analyze hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) samples from patients infected with hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus and identified L1 variants responsible for activating oncogenic pathways. Here, we have applied RC-seq and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to an Abcb4 (Mdr2)−/− mouse model of hepatic carcinogenesis and demonstrated for the first time that L1 mobilization occurs in murine tumors. In 12 HCC nodules obtained from 10 animals, we validated four somatic L1 insertions by PCR and capillary sequencing, including TF subfamily elements, and one GF subfamily example. One of the TF insertions carried a 3′ transduction, allowing us to identify its donor L1 and to demonstrate that this full-length TF element retained retrotransposition capacity in cultured cancer cells. Using RC-seq, we also identified eight tumor-specific L1 insertions from 25 HCC patients with a history of alcohol abuse. Finally, we used RC-seq and WGS to identify three tumor-specific L1 insertions among 10 intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients, including one insertion traced to a donor L1 on Chromosome 22 known to be highly active in other cancers. This study reveals L1 mobilization as a common feature of hepatocarcinogenesis in mammals, demonstrating that the phenomenon is not restricted to human viral HCC etiologies and is encountered in murine liver tumors.

The Role of Somatic L1 Retrotransposition in Human Cancers.

The human LINE-1 (or L1) element is a non-LTR retrotransposon that is mobilized through an RNA intermediate by an L1-encoded reverse transcriptase and other L1-encoded proteins. L1 elements remain actively mobile today and continue to mutagenize human genomes. Importantly, when new insertions disrupt gene function, they can cause diseases. Historically, L1s were thought to be active in the germline but silenced in adult somatic tissues. However, recent studies now show that L1 is active in at least some somatic tissues, including epithelial cancers. In this review, we provide an overview of these recent developments, and examine evidence that somatic L1 retrotransposition can initiate and drive tumorigenesis in humans. Recent studies have: (i) cataloged somatic L1 activity in many epithelial tumor types; (ii) identified specific full-length L1 source elements that give rise to somatic L1 insertions; and (iii) determined that L1 promoter hypomethylation likely plays an early role in the derepression of L1s in somatic tissues. A central challenge moving forward is to determine the extent to which L1 driver mutations can promote tumor initiation, evolution, and metastasis in humans.

Guardian of the Human Genome: Host Defense Mechanisms against LINE-1 Retrotransposition.

Long interspersed element type 1 (LINE-1, L1) is a mobile genetic element comprising about 17% of the human genome, encoding a newly identified ORF0 with unknown function, ORF1p with RNA-binding activity and ORF2p with endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activities required for L1 retrotransposition. L1 utilizes an endonuclease (EN) to insert L1 cDNA into target DNA, which induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is activated by DSBs and subsequently the ATM-signaling pathway plays a role in regulating L1 retrotransposition. In addition, the host DNA repair machinery such as non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathway is also involved in L1 retrotransposition. On the other hand, L1 is an insertional mutagenic agent, which contributes to genetic change, genomic instability, and tumorigenesis. Indeed, high-throughput sequencing-based approaches identified numerous tumor-specific somatic L1 insertions in variety of cancers, such as colon cancer, breast cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In fact, L1 retrotransposition seems to be a potential factor to reduce the tumor suppressive property in HCC. Furthermore, recent study demonstrated that a specific viral-human chimeric transcript, HBx-L1, contributes to hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated HCC. In contrast, host cells have evolved several defense mechanisms protecting cells against retrotransposition including epigenetic regulation through DNA methylation and host defense factors, such as APOBEC3, MOV10, and SAMHD1, which restrict L1 mobility as a guardian of the human genome. In this review, I focus on somatic L1 insertions into the human genome in cancers and host defense mechanisms against deleterious L1 insertions.

Widespread somatic L1 retrotransposition occurs early during gastrointestinal cancer evolution.

Somatic L1 retrotransposition events have been shown to occur in epithelial cancers. Here, we attempted to determine how early somatic L1 insertions occurred during the development of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Using L1-targeted resequencing (L1-seq), we studied different stages of four colorectal cancers arising from colonic polyps, seven pancreatic carcinomas, as well as seven gastric cancers. Surprisingly, we found somatic L1 insertions not only in all cancer types and metastases but also in colonic adenomas, well-known cancer precursors. Some insertions were also present in low quantities in normal GI tissues, occasionally caught in the act of being clonally fixed in the adjacent tumors. Insertions in adenomas and cancers numbered in the hundreds, and many were present in multiple tumor sections, implying clonal distribution. Our results demonstrate that extensive somatic insertional mutagenesis occurs very early during the development of GI tumors, probably before dysplastic growth.

Extensive transduction of nonrepetitive DNA mediated by L1 retrotransposition in cancer genomes

Long interspersed nuclear element-1 (L1) retrotransposons are mobile repetitive elements that are abundant in the human genome. L1 elements propagate through RNA intermediates. In the germ line, neighboring, nonrepetitive sequences are occasionally mobilized by the L1 machinery, a process called 3' transduction. Because 3' transductions are potentially mutagenic, we explored the extent to which they occur somatically during tumorigenesis. Studying cancer genomes from 244 patients, we found that tumors from 53% of the patients had somatic retrotranspositions, of which 24% were 3' transductions. Fingerprinting of donor L1s revealed that a handful of source L1 elements in a tumor can spawn from tens to hundreds of 3' transductions, which can themselves seed further retrotranspositions. The activity of individual L1 elements fluctuated during tumor evolution and correlated with L1 promoter hypomethylation. The 3' transductions disseminated genes, exons, and regulatory elements to new locations, most often to heterochromatic regions of the genome.

Landscape of somatic retrotransposition in human cancers.

Transposable elements (TEs) are abundant in the human genome, and some are capable of generating new insertions through RNA intermediates. In cancer, the disruption of cellular mechanisms that normally suppress TE activity may facilitate mutagenic retrotranspositions. We performed single-nucleotide resolution analysis of TE insertions in 43 high-coverage whole-genome sequencing data sets from five cancer types. We identified 194 high-confidence somatic TE insertions, as well as thousands of polymorphic TE insertions in matched normal genomes. Somatic insertions were present in epithelial tumors but not in blood or brain cancers. Somatic L1 insertions tend to occur in genes that are commonly mutated in cancer, disrupt the expression of the target genes, and are biased toward regions of cancer-specific DNA hypomethylation, highlighting their potential impact in tumorigenesis.

Somatic retrotransposition alters the genetic landscape of the human brain

Retrotransposons are mobile genetic elements that employ a germ line “copy-and-paste” mechanism to spread throughout metazoan genomes1. At least 50% of the human genome is derived from retrotransposons, with three active families (L1, Alu and SVA) associated with insertional mutagenesis and disease2-3. Epigenetic and post-transcriptional suppression block retrotransposition in somatic cells4-5, excluding early embryo development and some malignancies6-7. Recent reports of L1 expression8-9 and copy number variation10-11 (CNV) in the human brain suggest L1 mobilization may also occur during later development. However, the corresponding integration sites have not been mapped. Here we apply a high-throughput method to identify numerous L1, Alu and SVA germ line mutations, as well as 7,743 putative somatic L1 insertions in the hippocampus and caudate nucleus of three individuals. Surprisingly, we also found 13,692 and 1,350 somatic Alu and SVA insertions, respectively. Our results demonstrate that retrotransposons mobilize to protein-coding genes differentially expressed and active in the brain. Thus, somatic genome mosaicism driven by retrotransposition may reshape the genetic circuitry that underpins normal and abnormal neurobiological processes.

Retrotransposition and Structural Variation in the Human Genome

New assays are revealing that the diploid human genome contains extensive amounts of structural variation. Genome-wide approaches described in three papers in this issue (Beck et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2010; Iskow et al., 2010) paint a dynamic portrait of our genome, revealing a prominent role for repetitive sequences in shaping its structural variation.

Natural Mutagenesis of Human Genomes by Endogenous Retrotransposons

Two abundant classes of mobile elements, namely Alu and L1 elements, continue to generate new retrotransposon insertions in human genomes. Estimates suggest that these elements have generated millions of new germline insertions in individual human genomes worldwide. Unfortunately, current technologies are not capable of detecting most of these young insertions, and the true extent of germline mutagenesis by endogenous human retrotransposons has been difficult to examine. Here, we describe technologies for detecting these young retrotransposon insertions and demonstrate that such insertions indeed are abundant in human populations. We also found that new somatic L1 insertions occur at high frequencies in human lung cancer genomes. Genome-wide analysis suggests that altered DNA methylation may be responsible for the high levels of L1 mobilization observed in these tumors. Our data indicate that transposon-mediated mutagenesis is extensive in human genomes and is likely to have a major impact on human biology and diseases.

L1 integration in a transgenic mouse model

To study integration of the human LINE-1 retrotransposon (L1) in vivo, we developed a transgenic mouse model of L1 retrotransposition that displays de novo somatic L1 insertions at a high frequency, occasionally several insertions per mouse. We mapped 3' integration sites of 51 insertions by Thermal Asymmetric Interlaced PCR (TAIL-PCR). Analysis of integration locations revealed a broad genomic distribution with a modest preference for intergenic regions. We characterized the complete structures of 33 de novo retrotransposition events. Our results highlight the large number of highly truncated L1s, as over 52% (27/51) of total integrants were <1/3 the length of a full-length element. New integrants carry all structural characteristics typical of genomic L1s, including a number with inversions, deletions, and 5'-end microhomologies to the target DNA sequence. Notably, at least 13% (7/51) of all insertions contain a short stretch of extra nucleotides at their 5' end, which we postulate result from template-jumping by the L1-encoded reverse transcriptase. We propose a unified model of L1 integration that explains all of the characteristic features of L1 retrotransposition, such as 5' truncations, inversions, extra nucleotide additions, and 5' boundary and inversion point microhomologies.