This quality improvement study, conducted at the Kansas City Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Kansas City, Missouri, examined the change in patient reporting after transitioning from manual to CellaVision software-guided differentials and slide reviews. The primary focus was blasts and schistocytes, given their clinical significance. Three months of manual and CellaVision patient data were examined between May 2022 and February 2023. Blast and schistocyte patients were standardized to the total specimens performed and compared using 2-sample proportion testing. Other red blood cell (RBC) morphologies were also compared using this statistical analysis. Blast and schistocyte reporting after technologist review statistically increased after implementing the CellaVision software. This finding was most prevalent for low-percentage blasts. In addition, both morphologies experienced varying degrees of false-positive reporting, with 33% for low-percentage blasts and 91.7% for schistocytes. Other RBC morphologies displayed different levels of change, which could be clinically significant. The CellaVision software's increased sensitivity to blasts and schistocytes may benefit patient care, especially those with hematologic disorders. The software's high false-positive rate can be reduced by implementing quality metrics that prioritize clinically significant cells. This can be accomplished by implementing a CellaVision Champion to monitor reporting changes, perform patient lookbacks through the software, and provide technologist education. In addition, adopting a more stringent grading scale for schistocytes could also improve the high false-positive rate. Overall, CellaVision provides the ability to enhance hematology quality metrics by providing access to how patient cells are categorized and offering prompt education.
Read full abstract