Abstract. Acute soft tissue defects, such as persistent drainage, wound dehiscence, or necrosis, following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to the devastating complication of deep infection. Typically, when a medium-sized defect is present, a gastrocnemius flap is widely employed for soft tissue reconstruction due to its low morbidity and favourable functional outcomes. When facing this situation, we should consider associating the coverage treatment with a debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) surgery procedure, in order to treat a possible acute infection, even when the diagnosis of infection is not clear. We performed a retrospective study to compare TKA outcomes in patients with DAIR and flap procedures in the same surgical act against those who had received an isolated flap procedure for soft tissue reconstruction after an acute surgical wound defect. Patients had been identified from a prospectively collated TKA database. Between 2005 and 2021, 18 patients met our inclusion criteria, with a mean follow-up of approximately 8 years. A medial gastrocnemius flap procedure was performed for 15 patients (83 %). We compared the rates of infection clearance between the two groups. No differences in comorbidities or risk factors were observed between both groups. In the combination treatment group, 66.6 % of patients healed after treatment compared to 33.3 % in the isolated flap group. Although no significant statistical differences were found, the association of DAIR with the muscle flap procedure is highly recommended in the treatment of acute soft tissue defects after TKA. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to extrapolate these findings to the general population.