Objective: This study maps refugee self-settlements, or Jabar-Dakhal colonies, in 1950s–60s Kolkata to examine their effects on broader ecological transformations. Demographic 'others' are often segregated and confined to the cracks and margins of the normative city. Kolkata was a major site of refugee influx after the 1947 Partition. The refugees adapted to survive with minimal resources and transformed otherwise inhospitable terrains. The study counters claims that refugees are always environmental burdens and calls for grounded studies on refugee urbanism within the broader discourse of inclusive, sustainable urban development, as envisioned in SDG 11. Theoretical Framework: Urban refugees are understood as ‘bio-political’ subjects in a "state of exception," but with considerable agency. Method: Archival data identifies the locations of 145 pre-1950 and 123 post-1950 Jabar-Dakhal colonies in the Kolkata Metropolitan Area. Using GIS mapping, these locations are studied in relation to depleting eco-sensitive zones, such as the East Kolkata Wetlands. Primary interviews with early settlers offer insights into their resource management practices. Results and Discussion: Findings show little overlaps between refugee colonies and large-scale ecological degradation in Kolkata. State-led urban projects, like Salt Lake Township and Eastern Metropolitan Bypass, caused greater ecological impacts. Self-settled refugees demonstrated adaptive practices and careful resource management. Research Implications: The study advocates for integrating political ecology and socio-historical analysis into urban sustainability research in the Global South. It calls for context-sensitive, long-term research to address structural inequalities. The contemporary urban refugee crisis needs urgent academic and administrative attention to achieve SDG 11. Originality/Value: The study visualizes Jabar-Dakhal colonies’ spatial distribution to counter reductionist narratives of refugee-led environmental degradation. It reframes refugees as active urban agents, and reinforces the need for ‘Southern’ perspectives on urban sustainability.
Read full abstract