Society Of Nuclear Medicine And Molecular Imaging Research Articles

Can ChatGPT help patients understand radiopharmaceutical extravasations?

A previously published paper in the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) concluded that the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT may offer an adequate substitute for nuclear medicine staff informational counseling to patients in an investigated setting of 18F-FDG PET/CT. To ensure consistency with the previous paper, the author and a team of experts followed a similar methodology and evaluated whether ChatGPT could adequately offer a substitute for nuclear medicine staff informational counseling to patients regarding radiopharmaceutical extravasations. We asked ChatGPT fifteen questions regarding radiopharmaceutical extravasations. Each question or prompt was queried three times. Using the same evaluation criteria as the previously published paper, the ChatGPT responses were evaluated by two nuclear medicine trained physicians and one nuclear medicine physicist for appropriateness and helpfulness. These evaluators found ChatGPT responses to be either highly appropriate or quite appropriate in 100% of questions and very helpful or quite helpful in 93% of questions. The interobserver agreement among the evaluators, assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), was found to be 0.72, indicating good overall agreement. The evaluators also rated the inconsistency across the three ChatGPT responses for each question and found irrelevant or minor inconsistencies in 87% of questions and some differences relevant to main content in the other 13% of the questions. One physician evaluated the quality of the references listed by ChatGPT as the source material it used in generating its responses. The reference check revealed no AI hallucinations. The evaluator concluded that ChatGPT used fully validated references (appropriate, identifiable, and accessible) to generate responses for eleven of the fifteen questions and used generally available medical and ethical guidelines to generate responses for four questions. Based on these results we concluded that ChatGPT may be a reliable resource for patients interested in radiopharmaceutical extravasations. However, these validated and verified ChatGPT responses differed significantly from official positions and public comments regarding radiopharmaceutical extravasations made by the SNMMI and nuclear medicine staff. Since patients are increasingly relying on the internet for information about their medical procedures, the differences need to be addressed.

SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [18F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0.

PREAMBLEThe Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional nonprofit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide between individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. The EANM was founded in 1985. SNMMI and EANM members are physicians, technologists, and scientists specializing in the research and practice of nuclear medicine.The SNMMI and EANM will periodically define new guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the world. Existing practice guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated.Each practice guideline, representing a policy statement by the SNMMI/EANM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review. The SNMMI and EANM recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guideline by those entities not providing these services is not authorized.These guidelines are an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, both the SNMMI and the EANM caution against the use of these guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question.The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by the physician or medical physicist in light of all the circumstances presented. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines.The practice of medicine includes both the art and the science of the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment.Therefore, it should be recognized that adherence to these guidelines will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources, and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.

Joint EANM/EANO/RANO/SNMMI practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands: version 1.0.

To provide practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands. This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neurooncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO). Positron emission tomography (PET) using somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands can detect meningioma tissue with high sensitivity and specificity and may provide clinically relevant information beyond that obtained from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging alone. SSTR-directed PET imaging can be particularly useful for differential diagnosis, delineation of meningioma extent, detection of osseous involvement, and the differentiation between posttherapeutic scar tissue and tumour recurrence. Moreover, SSTR-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging investigational treatment approach for meningioma. These practice guidelines will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with meningiomas and related SSTR-targeted PRRTs in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers, facilitate comparability of studies, and to collect larger databases. The current document provides additional information to the evidence-based recommendations from the PET/RANO Working Group regarding the utilization of PET imaging in meningiomas Galldiks (Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(12):1576-87). The information provided should be considered in the context of local conditions and regulations.

Abstract PO2-07-07: The role of PET imaging with [18F]16α-fluoro-17β-fluoroestradiol in predicting response to endocrine therapies in patients with breast cancer

Abstract Background Fluoroestradiol F18 is a radioactive diagnostic agent (18F-FES) used with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to detect estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive lesions in patients with breast cancer. Convened by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), an expert working group published appropriate use criteria (AUC) for 18F-FES PET including, but not limited to, use of 18F-FES for selection of endocrine therapies. Quantitative determination of ER status, and thus treatment response, has the potential to prevent ineffective courses of endocrine therapies and associated therapeutic/financial burden. This meta-analysis reviewed the AUC-cited studies to assess the utility of 18F-FES in predicting treatment response to endocrine therapies. Methods Eight studies cited in the AUC were selected based on having comparable 18F-FES PET standardized uptake values (SUV) and progression-free survival (PFS) measures, and one additional study was included upon further systematic search of the same selected parameters defined in the AUC. With the nine studies (n = 327), we conducted three investigations to explore the association between: (1) the patient baseline 18F-FES PET SUVmean, across all lesions or across up to seven of the most intense lesions, and patient response to endocrine therapy (response/no response); (2) in the same population as investigation 1, the change (%) in 18F-FES PET SUV from baseline to at 7 to 10 days post-treatment; (3) the 18F-FES interlesional heterogeneity and PFS (months). Interlesional heterogeneity was qualitatively defined as patients displaying both 18F-FES positive and negative lesions versus those with all FES-positive lesions. Results A fixed effects model was used to analyze three studies (n = 102). Findings reveal that patients who responded to endocrine therapy had a significantly higher baseline SUVmean versus non-responders (mean difference 0.91; CI 95% 0.49 to 1.34; P < 0.001); a sensitivity analysis was conducted via random effects modelling and revealed similar results (mean difference 0.92; CI 95% 0.48 to 1.36; P < 0.001). This was consistent with findings from an additional analysis performed on two papers (n = 62), whereby odds ratio estimates indicated that a response to therapy is 89% less likely to occur when baseline 18F-FES SUVmax is < 1.5 (OR 0.11; CI 95% 0.02 to 0.72 P = 0.02). Findings from the analysis of mean percentage change in 18F-FES SUV from baseline to 7-10 days post-treatment initiation showed no significant difference in the percentage change of SUV observed between responders and non-responders (mean difference -0.22; 95% CI -0.69 to 0.26; P = 0.37). The final heterogeneity analysis revealed higher median PFS in all FES-positive cohort, suggesting that this group may respond better to endocrine therapy (Table 1). Conclusion The AUC states that the presence of ER by immunohistochemistry may not be the optimal predictive biomarker for the success of endocrine therapies. Our findings support this statement, as a significantly higher baseline SUVmean of 18F-FES may serve as a predictive biomarker for endocrine therapy response. Patients with a 18F-FES lesion SUVmax < 1.5 are 89% less likely to respond to endocrine therapies; patients demonstrating heterogeneity (FES+/FES- lesions) have a lower median PFS, reinforcing the predictive value of 18F-FES. Table 1. Median PFS scores from FES heterogeneity analysis *Patients with all FES positive lesions were categorised by the median ratio of FES/FDG SUVmax into low FES/FDG ( <0.96), and high FES/FDG (>0.96); only patients with FES/FDG of >0.96 were included in the positive lesions arm. Citation Format: Nicholas DiGregorio, Christine Brand, Dustin Dunham, Eleanor McManus. The role of PET imaging with [18F]16α-fluoro-17β-fluoroestradiol in predicting response to endocrine therapies in patients with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-07-07.

Implementation of PSMA PET/CT and alignment of ordering to SNMMI appropriate use criteria in a large network system.

The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) provides appropriate use criteria (AUC) for prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PSMA PET/CT) which include guidance on imaging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer and in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) disease. This study aims to examine trends in PSMA implementation and the prevalence and outcomes of scans ordered in scenarios deemed rarely appropriate or not meeting SNMMI AUC. We retrospectively identified patients who were diagnosed with presumptive National Comprehensive Cancer Network unfavorable intermediate, high, or very high risk prostate cancer, patients who underwent staging for BCR, and all patients staged with PSMA between July 2021 and March 2023. Positivity was validated by adherence to a predetermined reference standard. The frequency of PSMA use increased in initial staging from 24% to 80% and work-up of BCR from 91% to 99% over our study period. In addition, 5% (17/340) of PSMA scans ordered for initial staging did not meet AUC and 3% (15/557) of posttreatment scans were deemed rarely appropriate. Initial staging orders not meeting SNMMI AUC resulted in no positivity (0/17), while rarely appropriate posttreatment scans were falsely positive in 75% (3/4) of cases. Urologists (53%, 17/32) comprised the largest ordering specialty in rarely appropriate use. The frequency of PSMA use rose across the study period. A significant minority of patients received PSMA PET/CT in rarely appropriate scenarios yielding no positivity in initial staging and significant false positivity post-therapy. Further education of providers and electronic medical record-based interventions could help limit the rarely appropriate use of PET imaging.

An Evaluation of Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy Protocols in Health Care Institutions When Compared with the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Procedure Guidelines.

This study aimed to analyze the compliance of health care institutions with the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) procedure guidelines for gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES). Methods: A 19-question survey on demographics and the GES protocol was conducted using a Google form. The demographic questions covered position, number of technologists in the department, location, type of health care institution, and number of GES studies per month. The protocol questions included patient preparation, meal preparation, withholding of scheduled medications, radiopharmaceutical type, and radiopharmaceutical dose. The survey was sent to 7 nuclear medicine Facebook groups and a list of clinical affiliates provided by the Indiana University School of Medicine Nuclear Medicine Program. Descriptive statistics were compiled for most questions. A Fisher exact test with a significance level of 0.05 was used to compare the type of health care institution with compliance with the SNMMI GES protocol regarding radiolabeling time, meal preparation, and meal components, as well as to compare the type of health care institution with the number of GES studies performed per institution. Results: In total, 240 people responded to the survey. Most were nonsupervisory nuclear medicine technologists (72%) in nonacademic institutions (72%) and groups with 4 or more technologists (62%). Of the respondents, 72% followed the SNMMI guideline of adding the radiopharmaceutical before cooking, but only 37% followed the meal component guideline. There was no significant association between the type of institution or the number of GES studies and compliance with radiolabeling time or with meal preparation or components. Most respondents asked patients to withhold medications per SNMMI guidelines and used the recommended radiopharmaceutical (99mTc-sulfur colloid, 95%) at the recommended dose (18.5-37 MBq, 84%). Conclusion: Although most respondents followed most aspects of the SNMMI guidelines for GES, more than half did not use the recommended meal of liquid egg whites. Compliance did not vary between academic and nonacademic institutions or between groups performing a large or a small number of GES studies.

Inter-scanner Aβ-PET harmonization using barrel phantom spatial resolution matching.

The standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) is used to measure amyloid beta-positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) uptake in the brainDifferences in PET scanner technologies and image reconstruction techniques can lead to variability in PET images across scanners. This poses a challenge for Aβ-PET studies conducted in multiple centers. The aim of harmonization is to achieve consistent Aβ-PET measurements across different scanners. In this study, we proposean Aβ-PET harmonization methodof matching spatial resolution, as measured viaabarrel phantom, across PET scanners. Our approach wasvalidated using paired subject data, for whichpatients were imaged on multiple scanners. In this study, three different PET scanners were evaluated: the Siemens Biograph Vision 600, Siemens Biograph molecular computed tomography (mCT), and Philips Gemini TF64. A total of five, eight, and five subjects were each scanned twice with [18F]-NAV4694 across Vision-mCT, mCT-Philips, and Vision-Philips scanner pairs. The Vision and mCT scans were reconstructed using various iterations, subsets, and post-reconstruction Gaussian smoothing, whereas only one reconstruction configuration was used for the Philips scans. The full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of each reconstruction configuration was calculated using [18F]-filled barrel phantom scans with the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) phantom analysis toolkit. Regional SUVRs were calculated from 72 brain regions using the automated anatomical labelling atlas 3 (AAL3) atlas for each subject and reconstruction configuration. Statistical similarity between SUVRs was assessed using paired (within subject) t-tests for each pair of reconstructions across scanners; the higher the p-value, the greater the similarity between the SUVRs. Vision-mCT harmonization: Vision reconstruction with FWHM=4.10mm and mCT reconstruction with FWHM=4.30mm gave the maximal statistical similarity (maximum p-value) between regional SUVRs. Philips-mCT harmonization: The FWHM of the Philips reconstruction was 8.2mm and the mCT reconstruction with the FWHM of 9.35mm, which gave the maximal statistical similarity between regional SUVRs. Philips-Vision harmonization: The Vision reconstruction with an FWHM of 9.1mm gave the maximal statistical similarity between regional SUVRs when compared with the Philips reconstruction of 8.2mm and were selected as the harmonized for each scanner pair. Based on data obtained from three sets of participants, each scanned on a pair of PET scanners, it has been verified that using reconstruction configurations that produce matched-barrel, phantom spatial resolutions results in maximally harmonized Aβ-PET quantitation between scanner pairs. This finding is encouraging for the use of PET scanners in multi-center trials or updates during longitudinal studies. Question: Does the process of matching the barrel phantom-derived spatial resolution between scanners harmonize amyloid beta-standardized uptake value ratio (Aβ-SUVR) quantitation? Pertinent findings: It has been validated that reconstruction pairs with matched barrel phantom-derived spatial resolution maximize the similarity between subjects paired Aβ-PET (positron emission tomography) SUVR values recorded on two scanners. Implications for patient care: Harmonization between scanners in multi-center trials and PET camera updates in longitudinal studies can be achieved using a simple and efficient phantom measurement procedure, beneficial for the validity of Aβ-PET quantitation measurements.

International EANM-SNMMI-ISMRM consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology

PreambleThe Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide between individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. The merged International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) is an international, nonprofit, scientific association whose purpose is to promote communication, research, development, and applications in the field of magnetic resonance in medicine and biology and other related topics and to develop and provide channels and facilities for continuing education in the field.The ISMRM was founded in 1994 through the merger of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and the Society of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. SNMMI, ISMRM, and EANM members are physicians, technologists, and scientists specializing in the research and practice of nuclear medicine and/or magnetic resonance imaging.The SNMMI, ISMRM, and EANM will periodically define new guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and/or magnetic resonance imaging and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the world. Existing practice guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated. Each practice guideline, representing a policy statement by the SNMMI/EANM/ISMRM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review. The SNMMI, ISMRM, and EANM recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging and magnetic resonance imaging requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guideline by those entities not providing these services is not authorized.These guidelines are an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, the SNMMI, the ISMRM, and the EANM caution against the use of these guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question.The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by the physician or medical physicist in light of all the circumstances presented. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines.The practice of medicine includes both the art and the science of the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment.Therefore, it should be recognized that adherence to these guidelines will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources, and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.

Reexamining Compliance with Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy Guidelines: An Updated Analysis of the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Database.

Many variables can influence the results of gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES). A lack of standardization causes variability, limits comparisons, and decreases the credibility of the study. To increase standardization, in 2009 the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) published a guideline for a standardized, validated GES protocol for adults based on a 2008 consensus document. Laboratories must closely follow the consensus guideline to provide valid and standardized results as an incentive to achieve consistency in patient care. As part of the accreditation process, the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) evaluates compliance with such guidelines. The rate of compliance with the SNMMI guideline was assessed in 2016 and showed a substantial degree of noncompliance. The aim of this study was to reassess compliance with the standardized protocol across the same cohort of laboratories, looking for changes and trends. Methods: The IAC nuclear/PET database was used to extract GES protocols from all laboratories applying for accreditation from 2018 to 2021, 5 y after the initial assessment. The number of labs was 118 (vs. 127 in the initial assessment). Each protocol was again evaluated for compliance with the methods described in the SNMMI guideline. The same 14 variables were assessed in a binary fashion: patient preparation (4 variables-types of medications withheld, withholding of these medication for 48 h, blood glucose ≤ 200 mg/dL, blood glucose recorded), meal (5 variables-use of consensus meal, nothing by mouth for 4 h or more, meal consumed within 10 min, documentation of percentage of meal consumed, meal labeled with 18.5-37 MBq [0.5-1.0 mCi]), acquisition (2 variables-anterior and posterior projections obtained, imaging each hour out to 4 h), and processing (3 variables-use of the geometric mean, decay correction of data, and measurement of percentage retention). Results: Protocols from the 118 labs demonstrated that compliance is improving in some key areas but remains suboptimal in others. Overall, labs were compliant with an average of 8 of the 14 variables, with a low of 1-variable compliance at 1 site, and only 4 sites compliant with all 14 variables. Nineteen sites met an 80% threshold for compliance (11+ variables). The variable with the highest compliance was the patient's taking nothing by mouth for 4 h or more before the exam (97%). The variable with the lowest compliance was the recording of blood glucose values (3%). Notable areas of improvement include the use of the consensus meal, now 62% versus previously only 30% of labs. Greater compliance was also noted with measurement of retention percentages (instead of emptying percentages or half-times), with compliance by 65% of sites versus only 35% 5 y prior. Conclusion: Almost 13 y after the publication of the SNMMI GES guidelines, there is improving but still suboptimal protocol adherence among laboratories applying for IAC accreditation. Persistent variation in the performance of GES protocols may significantly affect patient management, as results may be unreliable. Using the standardized GES protocol permits interpretation of results in a consistent manner that allows interlaboratory comparisons and fosters acceptance of the test validity by referring clinicians.

SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Palliative Nuclear Medicine Therapies of Bone Metastases.

The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional

Summary: Appropriate Use Criteria for Estrogen Receptor-Targeted PET Imaging with 16α-18F-Fluoro-17β-Fluoroestradiol.

PET imaging with 16α-18F-fluoro-17β-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES), a radiolabeled form of estradiol, allows whole-body, noninvasive evaluation of estrogen receptor (ER). 18F-FES is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a diagnostic agent "for the detection of ER-positive lesions as an adjunct to biopsy in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer." The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) convened an expert work group to comprehensively review the published literature for 18F-FES PET in patients with ER-positive breast cancer and to establish appropriate use criteria (AUC). The findings and discussions of the SNMMI 18F-FES work group, including example clinical scenarios, were published in full in 2022 and are available at https://www.snmmi.org/auc Of the clinical scenarios evaluated, the work group concluded that the most appropriate uses of 18F-FES PET are to assess ER functionality when endocrine therapy is considered either at initial diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer or after progression of disease on endocrine therapy, the ER status of lesions that are difficult or dangerous to biopsy, and the ER status of lesions when other tests are inconclusive. These AUC are intended to enable appropriate clinical use of 18F-FES PET, more efficient approval of FES use by payers, and promotion of investigation into areas requiring further research. This summary includes the rationale, methodology, and main findings of the work group and refers the reader to the complete AUC document.

Novelties from the Joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM Guidelines on Immunotherapy.

In the past decade, the implementation of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has determined a major change in the management of oncological patients. The challenges associated to the new therapeutic regimen have promoted adapted criteria for response assessment to interpret imaging findings and atypical patterns of response. Parallel to the new morphological criteria, also 18fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission/computed tomography imaging has required novel approaches and specific guidelines on how to perform, interpret, and report the scan in patients with solid tumors under immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy. A summary of the novelties related to the new joint international European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)/Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI)/Australian and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine (ANZSNM) guidelines on immunotherapy is provided herein to elucidate most critical aspects in image interpretation.

SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for SSTR PET: Imaging Neuroendocrine Tumors

The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. Its 18,000 members are physicians, technologists, and scientists specializing

One institutions' experience with a true standard 15 mCi dose of I-131 for the treatment of Graves' disease.

Currently, there is a lack of consensus on the fixed dosage of RAI to be administered for this purpose between the main guideline frameworks set forth by the American Thyroid Association (ATA), Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and the European Thyroid Association (ETA). In this retrospective study, we will investigate the effectiveness of using a standard dose of 15 mCi ±10% of RAI in the treatment of Graves'. A retrospective chart review was conducted for the period between 1 May 2014 and 2 September 2020, to identify patients diagnosed with hyperthyroidism due to Graves' disease. The patients were grouped based on outcome and assessed for the efficacy of the dosage of 15 mCi ±10% of RAI in a successful treatment. Sixty-seven patients were identified that met the inclusion criteria between 1 May 2014 and 2 September 2020. Of the 67 RAI ablations; 60 patients became hypothyroid [60/67, (89.55%)], 2 euthyroid [2/67, (2.99%)] and 5 remained hyperthyroid [5/67, (7.46%)]. For the treatment of Graves' disease, the use of a standard low dose of 15 mCi ±10% has a high success rate without additional measurements or calculations beyond a standard planar image and 24-h uptake %. The adoption of a standard low dose of 15 mCi of I-131 across institutional guidelines would streamline dosage questions and eliminate the need to determine the weight of the thyroid for calculations in all RAI treatments for hyperthyroidism caused by Graves' disease.

SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Molecular Breast Imaging with Dedicatedγ-Cameras

The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional

Joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM practice guidelines/procedure standards on recommended use of [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging during immunomodulatory treatments in patients with solid tumors version 1.0

PurposeThe goal of this guideline/procedure standard is to assist nuclear medicine physicians, other nuclear medicine professionals, oncologists or other medical specialists for recommended use of [18F]FDG PET/CT in oncological patients undergoing immunotherapy, with special focus on response assessment in solid tumors.MethodsIn a cooperative effort between the EANM, the SNMMI and the ANZSNM, clinical indications, recommended imaging procedures and reporting standards have been agreed upon and summarized in this joint guideline/procedure standard.ConclusionsThe field of immuno-oncology is rapidly evolving, and this guideline/procedure standard should not be seen as definitive, but rather as a guidance document standardizing the use and interpretation of [18F]FDG PET/CT during immunotherapy. Local variations to this guideline should be taken into consideration.PreambleThe European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association founded in 1985 to facilitate worldwide communication among individuals pursuing clinical and academic excellence in nuclear medicine. The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote science, technology and practical application of nuclear medicine. The Australian and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine (ANZSNM), founded in 1969, represents the major professional society fostering the technical and professional development of nuclear medicine practice across Australia and New Zealand. It promotes excellence in the nuclear medicine profession through education, research and a commitment to the highest professional standards. EANM, SNMMI and ANZSNM members are physicians, technologists, physicists and scientists specialized in the research and clinical practice of nuclear medicine. All three societies will periodically put forth new standards/guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and improve service to patients. Existing standards/guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated. Each standard/guideline, representing a policy statement by the EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM, has undergone a thorough consensus process, entailing extensive review. These societies recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging requires particular training and skills, as described in each document. These standards/guidelines are educational tools designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate and effective nuclear medicine care for patients. These guidelines are consensus documents based on current knowledge. They are not intended to be inflexible rules or requirements of practice, nor should they be used to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, the EANM, SNMMI and ANZSNM caution against the use of these standards/guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by medical professionals considering the unique circumstances of each case. Thus, there is no implication that an action differing from what is laid out in the guidelines/procedure standards, standing alone, is below standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the standards/guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines/procedure standards. The practice of medicine involves not only the science, but also the art of dealing with the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible for general guidelines to consistently allow for an accurate diagnosis to be reached or a particular treatment response to be predicted. Therefore, it should be recognized that adherence to these standards/ guidelines will not ensure a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that practitioners follow a reasonable course of action, based on their level of training, current knowledge, clinical practice guidelines, available resources and the needs/context of the patient being treated. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective. The present guideline/procedure standard was developed collaboratively by the EANM, the SNMMI and the ANZSNM, with the support of international experts in the field. They summarize also the views of the Oncology and Theranostics and the Inflammation and Infection Committees of the EANM, as well as the procedure standards committee of the SNMMI, and reflect recommendations for which the EANM and SNMMI cannot be held responsible. The recommendations should be taken into the context of good practice of nuclear medicine and do not substitute for national and international legal or regulatory provisions.

Guide pour la réalisation d’un examen de scintigraphie de vidange gastrique

Why focus on gastric emptying scintigraphy in 2022? Described for the first time in 1966, this non-invasive, quantitative studies has long suffered from a lack of standardization of protocols (type of meal, patient positioning, examination duration, frequency of images, method of quantification, etc.), requiring in 2008 a consensus of the Society of Neurogastro-enterology and Motility and of the Society of Nuclear medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) detailing the methods and the interpretation criteria of this examination, particularly in the exploration of solids, and for the purpose of establishing normal reference values. Even if, despite this harmonization of practices, there is still a great variability in the protocols between the centers, gastric emptying scintigraphy remains today the gold standard in the exploration of Gastroparesis, a chronic disease of which diabete is the most common etiology, and the impact on the quality of life of patients can be significant. The significant progress in recent years in the knowledge of the pathophysiology and in the management of gastroparesis confirms the value of scintigraphy in this pathology; the indications, the methods and the interpretation criteria of this examination are recalled in this update of the French Recommendations of 2010.

EANM guideline on the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, prognostic value, therapy assessment and restaging of ovarian cancer, endorsed by the American College of Nuclear Medicine (ACNM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

In most patients with ovarian carcinoma, the diagnosis is reached when the disease is long past the initial stages, presenting already an advanced stage, and they usually have a very bad prognosis. Cytoreductive or debulking surgical procedures, platinum-based chemotherapy and targeted agents are key therapeutic elements. However, around 7 out of 10 patients present recurrent disease within 36months from the initial diagnosis. The metastatic spread in ovarian cancer follows three pathways: contiguous dissemination across the peritoneum, dissemination through the lymphatic drainage and, although less importantly in this case, through the bloodstream. Radiological imaging, including ultrasound, CT and MRI, are the main imaging techniques in which management decisions are supported, CT being considered the best available technique for presurgical evaluation and staging purposes. Regarding 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT, the evidence available in the literature demonstrates efficacy in primary detection, disease staging and establishing the prognosis and especially for relapse detection. There is limited evidence when considering the evaluation of therapeutic response. This guideline summarizes the level of evidence and grade of recommendation for the clinical indications of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in each disease stage of ovarian carcinoma.

ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI Expert Consensus Recommendations for Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2-Evidence Base and Standardized Methods of Imaging.

ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI Expert Consensus Recommendations for Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2-Evidence Base and Standardized Methods of Imaging.

PET/computed tomography in inpatients: part 1, international survey.

The purposes of this study are to (1) identify patterns of inpatient PET/computed tomography (CT) use in and outside of the USA and (2) characterize inpatient PET/CT use by location and indication. The study was deemed exempt by the Institutional Review Board. A survey link through REDCap was emailed to the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) members and PET Centers of Excellence members and posted on the SNMMI website. Data were collected from May 2018 to August 2018. Analyses were conducted using SAS Software 9.4 with the NPAR1WAY procedure. Differences were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test with statistical significance defined as P ≤ 0.05. A total of 124 people responded to the survey, 71.8% (89/124) in the USA, and 26.6% (33/124) outside the USA [1.6% (2/124) no response]. 81.5% (101/124) read inpatient PET/CTs. Median percent of inpatient PET/CTs was 8.0% (range 0-100). Use of inpatient PET/CT was different (P < 0.0001) in the USA (5%, range 0-80%) versus outside USA (17.7%, range 0-100%). Use of inpatient PET/CT was different by institution type: median percent of inpatient PET/CTs in community teaching hospitals was 4.5% (range 0-50) versus 1.1% (range 0-20) in community nonteaching, 10% (range 0-80) in academic medical centers, and 20.0% (range 6.3-40) in government-affiliated institutions (P = 0.0001). Most US and non-US respondents read inpatients PET/CTs. Non-US respondents read a higher percentage of inpatient PET/CTs than US respondents. Respondents in government-affiliated institutions read the highest percent of inpatient PET/CTs and community nonteaching institutions the least. Results of this survey may help physicians evaluate whether their practice of providing inpatient PET/CT fits with current practice patterns.