This study explores the concept of epistemological chaos in contemporary social sciences, particularly within the context of postmodern thought. Traditional notions of certainty are challenged in a world defined by uncertainty. We move beyond a simplistic portrayal of “anarchists” versus “strict rationalists” to examine the unconventional yet potentially transformative relationship between chaos, non-methodological approaches, and the evolving epistemic landscape. Departing from conventional methodologies, the paper investigates how embracing chaos and a certain degree of non-method can open new avenues for knowledge interpretation and production. Through a multi-faceted analysis that incorporates diverse perspectives and interdisciplinary approaches, the study sheds light on the potential for theoretical innovation. It explores how seemingly chaotic and unsystematic approaches can contribute to the formation of a more nuanced understanding of knowledge in contemporary social sciences. The knowledge society seems to be transitioning towards an era characterized by uncertainty, where traditional concepts are challenged. This coincides with a growing emphasis on human agency. There's a movement advocating for liberation from the constraints of rigid methodologies, a return to the role of imagination in scientific inquiry, and even a renewed appreciation for the role of myth and legend in shaping knowledge. The study ultimately asks: can “anarchic knowledge” (knowledge production outside established methods) be a viable alternative? Can it create a cognitive landscape that restores humanity's central role in the creative process of knowledge production?
Read full abstract