REVIEWS 371 Britain. Secondly, in terms oftheindividual universities, ElizabethFordham dealswiththeUniversity ofParis,AndreiAndreevwithMoscow'suniversity staff, EvgeniiRostovtsev withSt Petersburg University, IskanderGilyazov withtheUniversity ofKazan' and itsstudents, SirjeTamul writes aboutthe University of Dorpat,ArkadiuszStempindeals withthe reopeningof the University ofWarsawundertheGermanrulein 1915, FrancoisCondette with theUniversity ofLilleunderGermanoccupationand Susan Morrissey with thestudents in Petrograd, whileDetlefBussedescribes research workdirectly linkedto the Germanwar effort in the University of Göttingen. Finally, several contributors survey theimportant forms oflinks between warpressures and the different kindsof facultiesor concentratetheirattentionupon individual thinkers and scholarsor theprevailing viewsof themembersof academiccommunities ingeneralinRussiaand Germany. The editor, Trude Maurer,in additiontotheintroductory chapteron theuniversities at timeof war,analyses theconceptofuniversitas militans withparticular reference to the lateGermanKaiserreich. In each case thespecialcircumstances applying to a particular university are wellbrought to thefore. In thelightoftheevidencepresented here,thequestions ofhow theuniversities inall thecountries underscrutiny responded tothecalltoarms,how speedily, solidly and willingly theygavetheirfullsupport to thewarand the efforts todefeat theenemy and exactly bywhatmeasures they tried toachieve itare fully and convincingly answered. All thosewho carefully read thedifferent paperswilleasilydiscover towhatextent and inwhatrespect thiswas truein each case. Thisleavesthequestion whythiswasthecase,butitisa very different kind of question,dealingwithnationalpsychewhich,nonetheless, affected all thebilligerents. In a way,mostcontributors havekeptitwellin theirminds butrefer toitimplicitly. This question, and all relatedissuesare,however, of enormous consequence.Was nationalprideinevitably so easilydegenerating intofanaticalchauvinism and boundlesshatredof the enemya forcethat nothingcould contain?Is it a permanent featureof the nationalpsyche, demonstrably present intheeighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth centuries, a cursenothing couldeliminate? Has thebeginning ofthis century really brought new raysof hope? In termsof the role of highereducationin societyin timesofcrisis and openconflict thecontents ofthisvolumecontainthoughtprovoking conclusions whichfarexceedthecourseofthetragic yearsof1914 to 1918. London J.J. Tomiak Ablonczy, Balázs. Pal Teleki(1874-1941): The Lifeofa Controversial Hungarian Politician. CHSP HungarianStudiesSeries,10. East European Monographs , 697. Social ScienceMonographs, CenterforHungarianStudies andPublications andInstitute ofHabsburgHistory, Boulder, CO, Wayne, NJand Budapest, 2006.ix + 338pp. Notes.Bibliography. Map. Indexes. $40.00. Count Pal Teleki was one of inter-war Hungary'sforemost politicians. He servedtwenty-five yearsas an MP and was twicePrimeMinister from 372 SEER, 87, 2, APRIL 200g 1920-21and again from1939-41.Both spellsas PrimeMinister moreover came at crucialperiodsin hiscountry's history. In 1920-21he oversawthe ongoing consolidation ofthecounter-revolutionary regime thatwouldgovern Hungaryuntil1944and helpedfleshout aspectsof thisregime'sideology, whilehissecondspellas PrimeMinister culminated inhisdecisiontocommit Hungariantroopsto theAxisinvasionofYugoslavia,and thereby formally entered hiscountry intotheSecondWorldWar. His publicpersonawas,however, thatofa professor first and a politician second. Indeed the enduringcaricatureof Teleki is as a tragicfigure, persuadedtoleavethelecture halltoguidehiscountry inperilous times, and succumbing, duringhisfirst spellas PrimeMinister, to nervousexhaustion, and duringhis second spell to a despairthatcould onlybe relievedby suicide. Adopting a chronological approach,thisbiography, by one oftherising starsofthenewgeneration ofpost-Communist Hungarianhistorians, doesan excellent job ofunravelling thedifferent facets ofTeleki'scharacter. Bornin 1897intoone of thegreatnoble families of Transylvania, his membership ofthesocialelite, provincialism, devoutCatholicism and eliteeducation combinedtogivehima decidedly conservative outlook and determined hischoice ofcareer.He chosepolitical geography and developeda particular speciality incartography thatmanifested itself ina series ofimpressive publications, and earnedhimmembership ofHungary's elitescientific and socialorganizations, prestigious teaching appointments and theleadership ofvariousgovernment quangos.Abroad,hisinternational reputation culminated, in 1924,withhis appointment to thecommittee thatdrewup thenorthern borders ofthenew Iraq. Less flatteringly, he also developedan interest in racialquestionsand becamean ardent proponent ofthebizarretheory ofturanism whichposited thattheHungarians wereone branchofa pan-AsianTuranianpeople(with thepoliticalimplication thatHungaryshouldlook 'East' towardsitsethnic kin,rather than'West'towards liberal/ cosmopolitan Europe). In parallel withhisresearch andwriting healsosatinparliament from 1904 onwards.Althoughinitially finding the experienceunsatisfying, Hungary's (botched) experiment withleftist revolutions in 1918-19rekindled hispolitical energies and he servedseveralstints as foreign minister in thefirst counterrevolutionary governments beforebeingentrusted withthepremiership by theRegentMiklósHorthy inJuly1920.AsPrimeMinister heushered through parliament thefirst right-radical programme oftheinter-war period,which gave the Regentextensive powers,introduced the NumerusClausus (that limited thenumberofJewsin highereducation), approvedtheprinciple of Land Reform and sought(unsuccessfully) to bringthepublicfinances under control. Struggling, however, withthepressures ofhighoffice and suspected of involvement in a failedcoup d'étatengineered by CharlesIV, the last HabsburgMonarch,he resigned and made wayfora genuinemaster ofthe political game,hisfellow Transylvanian Count,IstvánBethlen. On theback benchesTeleki put to use his nationalreputation, foreign contactsand cartographic skillsto become, what the authorterms(with understandable hyperbole), the'organizer andideologueoftherevision' ofthe Trianonpeace treaty whichhad formally dismembered historic Hungary. He oversawthe productionof a huge amountof propaganda,includingthe reviews 373 launching ofvariousjournals,engagedin frequent foreign tripsto drumup supportforrevisionand got himself caughtup in a hare-brained attempt to undermine the Frenchcurrency by mass producingforgedfrancs;the exposureof which,in 1925was excuse enoughforTeleki to temporarily withdraw from politics. BythispointTelekiwas alreadyimmersed inanother ofhispetprojects...
Read full abstract