Introduction. One of the main issues of fundamental jurisprudence is the problem of the epistemology of law. Law is a complex social phenomenon in terms of content, forms of manifestation, and ideological guidelines (ideals). The phenomenon of law is understood differently; it is understood as: the order of the sovereign, the means of ensuring security, the means of class compromise, the natural rights and freedoms of citizens, the measure of freedom, the measure of labor and consumption, imperative-attributive emotions, the restriction of the external freedom of a person, the self-limitation of the state, the existence of free will, the divine will erected the will of the economically dominant class, the will of the whole people, the protection / delimitation of interests, universal human value, the minimum of morality, the result of the inaction of morality, etc. into law. Each approach to the definition of law is accompanied by a system of logical arguments and reveals one of the sides of this social and normative regulator. Theoretical Basis. Methods. The purpose of this work is to study the levels of knowledge of law as a socio-cultural phenomenon. To achieve this task, the following tasks are solved: an analysis of law as the most important social regulator of human activity; law is revealed as part of a person’s spiritual life; the main theoretical and methodological levels of knowledge of law are analyzed. The following methods were used in the course of the study: analysis and synthesis, hermeneutic, comparative approach. Results. The author came to the conclusion that in the science of law there are several levels of knowledge of law: 1) the encyclopedia of law involves a summary of the branch of legal sciences; it combines (consolidates) a huge array of factual information and expands the amount of knowledge about law, society, and the state; 2) the theory of law (general theory of law, theory of state and law), as inductive knowledge, extracts the general principles of law from the empirical material accumulated by branch sciences, creating a methodology for studying political and legal phenomena; 3) the philosophy of law deductively builds the doctrine of law, focusing on the desired ideal for the thinker (legal, political, social, personal, ethical, religious, etc.), thereby revealing the value nature of the legal phenomenon. Discussion and Conclusion. Philosophy and theory of law are independent sciences and disciplines. The article shows some differences and common features of the theory and philosophy of law. At the same time, the author emphasizes that all thinkers, both philosophers of law and theorists, build their concepts based on the position that law is a universally binding rule of behavior, and not descriptive maxims of science or political declarations.
Read full abstract