Researchers and teachers have both vigorously pursued and violently condemned the search for an objective measure of reading ability since at least the early part of this century (Johnston, 1984, 1988; Resnick, 1982). That search has distracted us from understanding the subtle, yet profound influence of human consciousness and social conditions on both the procedures and artifacts of reading assessment (Johnston, 1984; Madaus, 1986; Shulman, 1986). My research is about beliefs, values, and assumptions that have enjoyed uncritical privileging in reading assessment. It examines the orientations of seventeen educators, from teachers through Ministry of Education officials, and the circumstances that have helped shape the construction, administration, and interpretation of reading assessments in the elementary public school system of British Columbia. The sociological discipline of symbolic interactionism provides the construct of perspective (Becker, Geer, Hughes, & Strauss, 1961; Janesick, 1977; Mead, 1934) to characterize where the educators in this study stand and assess from. It uses the construct of a negotiated order (Hall, 1987; Strauss, 1978) to view the situated activity of these people and to study the social forces that helped shape their points of view. I wish better to understand the dynamic nature of assessment as a social-psychological phenomenon.