Snare Tip Soft Coagulation Research Articles

Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024.

1: ESGE recommends cold snare polypectomy (CSP), to include a clear margin of normal tissue (1-2 mm) surrounding the polyp, for the removal of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 2: ESGE recommends against the use of cold biopsy forceps excision because of its high rate of incomplete resection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 3: ESGE recommends CSP, to include a clear margin of normal tissue (1-2 mm) surrounding the polyp, for the removal of small polyps (6-9 mm).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 4: ESGE recommends hot snare polypectomy for the removal of nonpedunculated adenomatous polyps of 10-19 mm in size.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 5: ESGE recommends conventional (diathermy-based) endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large (≥ 20 mm) nonpedunculated adenomatous polyps (LNPCPs).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 6: ESGE suggests that underwater EMR can be considered an alternative to conventional hot EMR for the treatment of adenomatous LNPCPs.Weak recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 7: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may also be suggested as an alternative for removal of LNPCPs of ≥ 20 mm in selected cases and in high-volume centers.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends that, after piecemeal EMR of LNPCPs by hot snare, the resection margins should be treated by thermal ablation using snare-tip soft coagulation to prevent adenoma recurrence.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 9: ESGE recommends (piecemeal) cold snare polypectomy or cold EMR for SSLs of all sizes without suspected dysplasia.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 10: ESGE recommends prophylactic endoscopic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of LNPCPs in the right colon to reduce to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 11: ESGE recommends that en bloc resection techniques, such as en bloc EMR, ESD, endoscopic intermuscular dissection, endoscopic full-thickness resection, or surgery should be the techniques of choice in cases with suspected superficial invasive carcinoma, which otherwise cannot be removed en bloc by standard polypectomy or EMR.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence.

Snare Tip Soft Coagulation vs. Argon Plasma Coagulation vs. No Margin Treatment After Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyp Resection: A Randomized Trial

Snare Tip Soft Coagulation vs. Argon Plasma Coagulation vs. No Margin Treatment After Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyp Resection: A Randomized Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Thermal Ablation after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

(1) Background: Large colonic polyps during colonoscopy can be managed by Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). To decrease the polyp recurrence rate, thermal ablation methods like argon plasma coagulation (APC) and snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) have been introduced. We performed this network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of these modalities. (2) Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature review, through 5 January 2024, of databases including Embase, PubMed, SciELO, KCI, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science. Using a random effects model, we conducted a frequentist approach network meta-analysis. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Safety and efficacy endpoints including rates of recurrence, bleeding, perforation, and post polypectomy syndrome were compared. (3) Results: Our search yielded a total of 13 studies with 2686 patients. Compared to placebo, both APC (RR: 0.33 CI: 0.20-0.54, p < 0.01) and STSC (RR: 0.27, CI: 0.21-0.34, p < 0.01) showed decreased recurrence rates. On ranking, STSC showed the lowest recurrence rate, followed by APC and placebo. Regarding individual adverse events, there was no statistically significant difference between either of the thermal ablation methods and placebo. (4) Conclusions: We demonstrated the efficacy and safety of thermal ablation after EMR for decreasing recurrence of adenoma.

Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial

BackgroundNowadays, large benign lateral spreading lesions (LSLs) and sessile polyps in the colorectum are mostly resected by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). A major drawback of EMR is the polyp recurrence rate of up to 20%. Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) is considered an effective technique to reduce recurrence rates. However, clinical trials on STSC have mainly been conducted in expert referral centers. In these studies, polyp recurrence was assessed optically, and additional adjunctive techniques were excluded. In the current trial, we will evaluate the efficacy and safety of STSC in daily practice, by allowing adjunctive techniques during EMR and the use of both optical and histological polyp recurrence to assess recurrences during follow-up.MethodsThe RESPECT study is a multicenter, parallel-group, international single blinded randomized controlled superiority trial performed in the Netherlands and Germany. A total of 306 patients undergoing piecemeal EMR for LSLs or sessile colorectal polyps sized 20–60 mm will be randomized during the procedure after endoscopic complete polyp resection to the intervention or control group. Post-EMR defects allocated to the intervention group will be treated with thermal ablation with STSC of the entire resection margin. Primary outcome will be polyp recurrence by optical and histological confirmation at the first surveillance colonoscopy after 6 months. Secondary outcomes include technical success and complication rates.DiscussionThe RESPECT study will evaluate if STSC is effective in reducing recurrence rates after piecemeal EMR of large colorectal lesions in daily clinical practice performed by expert and non-expert endoscopists. Moreover, endoscopists will be allowed to use adjunctive techniques to remove remaining adenomatous tissue during the procedure. Finally, adenomatous polyp recurrence during follow-up will be defined by histologic identification.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05121805. Registered on 16 November 2021. Start recruitment: 17 March 2022. Planned completion of recruitment: 31 April 2025.

A133 MARGIN THERMAL ABLATION WITH SNARE-TIP SOFT COAGULATION EFFECTIVELY MITIGATES RECURRENCE AFTER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION OF LARGE NON-PEDUNCULATED COLORECTAL POLYPS

Abstract Background Recurrence following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) historically occurs in approximately 15-20% of large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs). Margin thermal ablation with snare-tip soft coagulation (STSC) of the post-EMR defect is an evidence-based modality to mitigate recurrence. However, international validation of margin thermal ablation outcomes is needed. Aims To evaluate the frequencies of endoscopic and histologic recurrence following margin thermal ablation with STSC for LNPCPs managed by EMR. Methods Consecutive patients ampersand:003E 18 years of age who underwent endoscopic resection for a LNPCP were enrolled in a prospective single center observation cohort study (clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05402696). Of those lesions which underwent successful EMR, margin STSC was applied systematically aiming to create at least a 2-3mm rim of completed ablated tissue (complete whitening). Recurrence was evaluated both endoscopically, using a standardized protocol for the post-EMR scar, and histologically. Results From 06/2022-09/2023, 335 LNPCPs were endoscopically resected, including 209 by EMR. Following successful EMR, 182 (87.1%) underwent margin STSC. Of these lesions, 49 LNPCPs in 46 patients were assessed at first surveillance colonoscopy. Margin STSC was complete for 44 (89.8%) lesions and incomplete for 5 (10.2%) due to difficult angulation/positioning (n=3) and ileocecal valve location (n=2). Median interval to first surveillance colonoscopy was 6 (IQR 6-7) months. There was no evidence of recurrence noted on endoscopy. Biopsy was performed in 44 (89.8%) with no evidence of histologic recurrence. Conclusions Thermal ablation of the defect margin with STSC effectively negates recurrence and should be considered standard of care following EMR. Funding Agencies None

Endoscopic resection of large anastomotic polyps is safe and effective.

Large (≥20mm) adenomatous anastomotic polyps (LAAPs) are uncommon. Data pertaining to their prevalence, characteristics, and the efficacy of endoscopic resection (ER) are absent. A safe and effective strategy for ER would reduce morbidity and healthcare costs. Large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of ≥20mm (LNPCPs) referred for ER were prospectively studied. Multiple data points were recorded including anastomotic location, polyp morphology, resection modality, complications, and technical success. Over 7 years until November 2022, 2629 lesions were referred. Of these, 10 (0.4%) were LAAPs (median size 35 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 30-40mm]). All LAAPs were removed by piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), most (n=9; 90%) in combination with cold-forceps avulsion with adjuvant snare-tip soft coagulation (CAST). On comparison of the LAAP group with the conventional LNPCP group, CAST was more commonly used (90% vs. 9%; P<0.001) and deep mural injury (DMI) type II was more frequent (40% vs. 11%, P=0.003); however, significant DMI (III-V) did not occur. At 6 month (IQR 5.25-6 months) surveillance, there was no recurrence in any of the 10 cases. There were no serious adverse events. LAAPs present unique challenges owing to their location overlying an anastomosis. Despite these challenges they can be safely and effectively managed endoscopically without recurrence at endoscopic follow-up.

Snare Tip Soft Coagulation vs Argon Plasma Coagulation vs No Margin Treatment After Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyp Resection: a Randomized Trial

Background and AimsThermal treatment of the defect margin after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions reduces the recurrence rate. Both snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) and argon plasma coagulation (APC) have been used for thermal margin treatment, but there are few data directly comparing STSC to APC for this indication. MethodsWe performed a randomized 3 arm trial in 9 U.S. centers comparing STSC to APC to no margin treatment (control) of defects after EMR of colorectal non-pedunculated lesions ≥ 15 mm. The primary endpoint was the presence of residual lesion at first follow-up. ResultsThere were 384 patients and 414 lesions randomized, and 308 patients (80.2%) with 328 lesions completed ≥ 1 follow-up. The proportion of lesions with residual polyp at first follow-up was 4.6% with STSC, 9.3% with APC and 21.4% with controls (no margin treatment). The odds of residual polyp at first follow-up were lower for STSC and APC when compared to control, p=0.001 and p=0.01, respectively. The difference in odds was not significant between STSC and APC. STSC took less time to apply than APC (median 3.35 vs 4.08 minutes; p=0.019). Adverse event rates were low, with no difference between arms. ConclusionsIn a randomized trial STSC and APC were each superior to no thermal margin treatment after EMR. STSC was faster to apply than APC. Because STSC also results in lower cost and plastic waste than APC (APC requires an additional device ), our study supports STSC as the preferred thermal margin treatment after colorectal EMR. (Clinicaltrials.gov, Number NCT03654209)

S193 Adoption and Outcomes of Mucosal Defect Margin Snare Tip Soft Coagulation Following Piecemeal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

S193 Adoption and Outcomes of Mucosal Defect Margin Snare Tip Soft Coagulation Following Piecemeal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Commentary.

Local recurrence after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is common and it is a major drawback of this technique. Thermal ablation of resection margins after EMR using snare-tip soft coagulation has been shown to decrease the risk of local recurrence in a randomized trial [1]. Hybrid argon plasma coagulation (hAPC) is an alternative ablation technique that can be used to perform margin ablation. Recent studies on hAPC for post-EMR margin ablation showed low rates of local recurrence.

WEO Newsletter.

WEO Newsletter.

Distal Cap-assisted Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Non-lifting Colorectal Polyps: An International, Multicenter Study

Background and AimsSubmucosal fibrosis is a commonly encountered problem associated with complex polyps referred for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Previous biopsies, submucosal tattoo injection, and previous unsuccessful attempts at polyp resection have all been shown to induce submucosal fibrosis, which makes subsequent EMR more difficult and increases the risk of recurrence. MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, international, retrospective study of 61 distal cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-DC) cases done for the indication of a non-lifting colorectal lesion occurring after a previous biopsy, tattoo, or attempted resection at 3 tertiary referral centers. ResultsEMR-DC was preceded by attempted polypectomy or EMR in 88.5% of cases, submucosal tattoo injection in 2%, previous biopsy in 5%, and both biopsy and tattoo in 5%. Complete macroscopic resection was achieved in 100% of EMR-DC procedures in an average procedure time of 49.5 minutes. The adenoma recurrence rate for these adherent lesions at surveillance (average 6.6 months) was only 9.8%. Two serious adverse events occurred (3.3%) within 30 days of the procedure: one instance of postprocedural bleeding and one episode of post-polypectomy syndrome. ConclusionThis large, multicenter series demonstrates EMR-DC to be a safe, effective, and efficient approach to a difficult and common clinical problem: adherent and non-lifting polyps. It may offer several advantages over more expensive or invasive endoscopic techniques used for this indication. The use of EMR-DC for larger adherent polyps with adjuvant techniques such as hot avulsion or cold forceps avulsion with adjuvant snare tip soft coagulation for smaller adherent sections may represent an ideal approach.

Impact of margin ablation after EMR of large nonpedunculated colonic polyps in routine clinical practice

Owing to its simplicity, effectiveness, and safety, EMR is the preferred treatment for the majority of large (≥20mm) nonpedunculated colonic polyps (LNPCPs); however, residual and recurrent adenomas (RRAs) encountered during surveillance constitute a major limitation. Thermal ablation of the post-EMR mucosal defect margin has been shown to be highly efficacious in reducing RRA in a randomized trial setting, but data on effectiveness in clinical practice are scarce. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of this technique for reducing RRAs in routine clinical practice. We analyzed data collected in 3 hospitals in Israel: Prospective data were available in 2 hospitals where margin thermal ablation with snare-tip soft coagulation (STSC) is routinely performed after EMR of LNPCP (TA-EMR). Only retrospective data were available from the third center, which exclusively did not perform STSC (standard EMR] [S-EMR]), during the study period. Surveillance was performed 4 to 6 months after resection. RRA was assessed endoscopically with high-definition white light and optical chromoendoscopy. The primary endpoint was RRA at first surveillance colonoscopy. Data from 764 patients with 824 LNPCPs were analyzed. The patient and lesion characteristics were similar between the groups. Four hundred sixty-four LNPCPs were treated by TA-EMR and 360 LNPCPs by S-EMR. RRA at first surveillance colonoscopy was detected in 14 (3.6%) of lesions in the TA-EMR group compared with 96 (31.6%) in the S-EMR group (P< .001; RR= .14; 95% CI, .07-.29). Adverse events were comparable between the 2 groups. TA-EMR leads to a significant reduction in post-EMR recurrence in routine clinical practice.

Impact of margin thermal treatment after EMR of giant (≥40 mm) colorectal lateral spreading lesions

Increasing lesion size is a risk factor for recurrence after piecemeal EMR (pEMR). Snare-tip soft coagulation (STSC) treatment of the normal-appearing margin after pEMR of lesions≥ 20mm has been shown to reduce recurrence rates by 75% to 80%. We sought to evaluate the impact of STSC on giant (≥ 40mm) lateral spreading lesions treated by pEMR. We describe the relative risk and absolute risks of recurrence with and without STSC margin treatment after EMR of≥ 40-mm lesions. We performed a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected database on large lesions describing lesion size, location, and methods of resection. We excluded lesions< 40mm in maximum dimension, those that did not undergo follow-up care at our center, and those in which argon plasma coagulation was used for either ablative treatment of residual polyp or margin treatment. Propensity score analysis was used to account for potential differences between patients treated with and without STSC. There were 68 lesions≥ 40mm removed by pEMR without STSC treatment and 133 removed and treated with STSC. There were no differences between groups in demographics, polyp size, location, histologic features, and mean follow-up time. The recurrence rate in the no-treatment group was 35% versus 9% with STSC (P< .00001 by direct comparison and P= .008 by using the propensity score analysis). STSC treatment after pEMR of large lateral spreading lesions in the colorectum reduced recurrences by 75%. However, the absolute recurrence rate of 9% remained clinically significant in the STSC-treated group. Short-term follow-up care after STSC of lesions≥ 40mm is still warranted, and additional study of technical factors that eliminate recurrence after pEMR of giant lateral spreading lesions is warranted.

Post-EMR for colorectal polyps, thermal ablation of defects reduces adenoma recurrence: A meta-analysis.

Background and study aims Adenoma recurrence is one of the key limitations of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), which occurs in 15 % to 30 % of cases during first surveillance colonoscopy. The main hypothesis behind adenoma recurrence is leftover micro-adenomas at the margins of post-EMR defects. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the efficacy of snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) at the margins of mucosal defects to reduce adenoma recurrence and bleeding complications. Methods Electronic databases such as PubMed and the Cochrane library were used for systematic literature search. Studies with polyps only resected by piecemeal EMR and active treatment: with STSC, comparator: non-STSC were included. A random effects model was used to calculate the summary of risk ratio and 95 % confidence intervals. The main outcome of the study was to compare the effect of STSC versus non-STSC with respect to adenoma recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy after thermal ablation of post-EMR defects. Results Five studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The total number patients who completed first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1) in the STSC group was 534 and in the non-STSC group was 514. The pooled adenoma recurrence rate was 6 % (37 of 534 cases) in the STSC arm and 22 % (115 of 514 cases) in the non-STSC arm, (odds ratio [OR] 0.26, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.16–0.41, P = 0.001). The pooled delayed post-EMR bleeding rate 19 % (67 of 343) in the STSC arm and 22 % (78 of 341) in the non-STSC arm (OR 0.82, 95 %CI, 0.57–1.18). Conclusions Thermal ablation of post-EMR defects significantly reduces adenoma recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy.

Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins to prevent local recurrence of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps is characterized by a high risk of recurrence. Thermal ablation of the mucosal defect margins may reduce recurrence in these lesions, but a systematic overview of the current evidence is lacking. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane until July 2021, for studies on thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Main goal of this meta-analysis was to identify pooled risk difference of recurrence between thermal ablation vs. no adjuvant treatment. Secondary goal was to identify pooled recurrence rate after snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) and argon plasma coagulation (APC). Results Ten studies on thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins were included, with three studies on argon plasma coagulation, six studies on snare tip soft coagulation and one study comparing both treatment modalities, representing a total of 316 APC cases and 1598 STSC cases. Overall pooled risk difference of recurrence was –0.17 (95 % confidence interval [CI] –0.22 to –0.12) as compared to no adjuvant treatment. Pooled risk difference was –0.16 (95 % CI –0.19 to –0.14) for STSC and –0.26 (95 % CI –0.80 to 0.28) for APC. Pooled recurrence rate was 4 % (95 % CI 2 % to 8 %) for STSC and 9 % (95 % CI 4 % to 19 %) for APC. Conclusions Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins significantly reduces recurrence rate in large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions compared to no adjuvant treatment. While no evidence for superiority exists, STSC may be preferred over APC, because this method is the most evidence-based, and cost-effective modality.

A122 OUTCOMES OF COLD SNARE POLYPECTOMY FOR POLYPS GREATER THAN 20 MM: DATA FROM AN ACADEMIC CENTER

BackgroundCold snare polypectomy (CSP) is widely utilized for resection of small polyps (less than 10mm), due to the technique’s favourable safety profile. However, Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (HSEMR) remains the standard of care for large polyps greater than or equal to 20mm. HSEMR carries an increased risk of complications. These include delayed bleeding, perforation, and post-polypectomy syndrome, along with residual or recurrent adenomatous (RRA).More recently, Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (CSEMR) technique has been used selectively for polyps greater than 20mm. Published studies have demonstrated a significantly lower adverse event rate of complications as compared with HSEMR. RRA utilizing CSP remains a concern, with a recent publication reporting a recurrence of 34.8% on follow-up endoscopy. We present the experience at a single Canadian academic centre with patients undergoing CSEMR for polyps greater than 20mm.AimsTo demonstrate the efficacy and safety of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection CSEMR of large (greater than or equal to 20mm) polyps at a single Canadian academic centre.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed colonoscopies performed by endoscopists employing this technique at our centre from January 2020 to August 2021. 15 total cases were identified for patients with polyps greater than or equal to 20 mm, removed by CSEMR technique.ResultsPatient age ranged from 41 to 76, with a median patient age was 66. There were 10 males and 5 females. There were no adverse events intraoperatively. 15/15 (100%) polyps were successfully resected using CSEMR technique. Polyp size ranged from 2 cm to 7 cm, and there was a median polyp size of 3 cm. 14/15 (93%) polyps were proximal to the splenic flexure, with 1/15 (7%) polyp in the rectum. 6/15 (40%) patients received snare tip soft coagulation to the edges of the polypectomy site. Polyp histology included 7 tubular adenomas, 3 tubulovillous adenomas, 4 sessile serrated polyps, and one hyperplastic polyp. Two patients were on aspirin 81 mg daily, and there were zero patients on any other antiplatelets or anticoagulation. 1/15 patient presented with late bleeding requiring emergent colonoscopy. There were no immediate or delayed perforations or other serious adverse events recorded.Approximately 50% of patients have had follow-up colonoscopy within 3–6 months of their initial procedure. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 252 days, with a median time to follow up of 171 days. 3/7 (43%) patients had histologic evidence of recurrence at follow-up colonoscopy, all of which were successfully treated endoscopically.ConclusionsSelective CSEMR is a safe and effective technique, with a low risk of complications. There may be a higher rate of residual polyp at follow-up colonoscopy compared to HSEMR. This data will need further validation with a larger sample size. Funding AgenciesNone

Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (> 20 mm) non pedunculated colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) > 20 mm in size can be challenging. Piecemeal EMR of these lesions results in high rates of adenoma recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1). Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) of post resection margins is a safe and effective technique to prevent adenoma recurrence. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this technique. Patients and methods Multiple databases were searched through April 2021 for studies that reported on outcomes of post EMR STSC for LSTs > 20 mm in size. Meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled odds of adenoma recurrence as well as pooled proportion of adverse events including intraprocedural and delayed bleeding as well as intraprocedural perforation events. Results Six studies including two randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four cohort studies with 2122 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall pooled odds of adenoma recurrence at SC1 with post EMR STSC compared to no STSC was 0.27 (95 % 0.18–0.42; I2 = 0 %), P < 0.001. Pooled rate of adenoma recurrence at SC1 in post EMR STSC cohort was 6 %. Rates of intraprocedural bleeding, delayed bleeding and intraprocedural perforation were 10.3 %, 6.5 % and 2 % respectively. Conclusions Our results show that thermal ablation of resection margins with STSC in LSTs > 20 mm is a safe and effective technique in reducing the incidence of adenoma recurrence.

S185 Soft Tip Coagulation and Partial Defect Closure in Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Tertiary Care Center Experience

Introduction: Around 10-15% of polyps found during screening colonoscopies are large and challenging to resect, requiring endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). EMR for large (>2 cm), flat, or laterally spreading tumors has become a standard of practice. However, the mucosal defects expose submucosal vessels to injury, resulting in intraprocedural bleeding (IPB) in around 12% of cases, delayed post-procedural bleeding (DPPB) in around 4%, and a perforation rate of around 1%. Aims: Describe outcomes of large polyp piecemeal EMR followed by avulsion of non-bleeding vessels using snare tip soft coagulation in the resection bed along with edge clipping, and compare complication rates to those reported in the literature Methods: This is a case series that includes prospectively and retrospectively collected data on adult patients who underwent EMR polypectomy for polyps³ 2 cm in size at a single tertiary-care referral center. We describe the experience of a single endoscopist who performed all procedures with piecemeal EMR using a 2 cm hot snare, followed by avulsion of the remaining vessels using snare tip soft coagulation, and finally deploying clips at the edges. We performed descriptive statistics as well as single sample proportion comparison of complication rates with those reported in the literature Results: 118 patients were included of which, 59 (57.3%) were males, 89 (86.6%) were whites, and 34 (28.8%) were on an antithrombotic drug. In regards to procedure related outcomes, 76 (64.4 %) polyps were in the right colon, mean polyp size was 36.8 mm (± 20.6), 57 (48.3%) polyps measured ³ 40 mm, 60 (51.3%) appeared sessile, and 58 (49.2%) were tubular adenomas. An average of 2.5 clips were used per procedure. IPB was seen in 18 (15.3%), while 3 (2.5%) patients had DPPB, and 2 (1.7%) had perforation. When compared to the current literature, our data revealed no statistically significant difference in IPB rates (P=0.06), DPPB (P=0.67) and perforation rates (P=0.45). Conclusion: The complication rates of this novel EMR technique are similar to those reported in the literature. The limited use of endoclips at the defect edges only, has the potential to decrease healthcare costs associated with the higher number of endoclip needed for full defect closure. Larger RCTs and cost-analysis studies are needed to further explore those findings.

S236 Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC) After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Large (&gt;20 mm) Non Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes

S236 Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC) After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Large (&gt;20 mm) Non Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes

Histopathological effects of electrosurgical interventions in an in vivo porcine model of colonic endoscopic mucosal resection

ObjectiveEndoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the colon has been widely adopted, but there is limited data on the histopathological effects of the differing electrosurgical currents (ESCs) used. We used an...