Over the past 10 years, the Korean government has declared its intention to achieve carbon neutrality to the international community and strived to create smart cities and green cities as a practice to achieve carbon neutrality. In the same context, the Smart Green City project, which began in earnest at the end of 2020, initially attracted national attention due to the strong will of the administration. However, limitations in its performance were revealed. This study aimed to identify the policy mechanisms that led the Korean government to pursue the Smart Green City project using a critical juncture approach and to derive useful implications for policy selection. A critical juncture framework was applied for in-depth analysis, and a descriptive case study based on critical thinking was conducted. The results confirmed that endogenous and exogenous environmental changes surrounding the government at critical junctures were mechanisms for establishing the Smart Green City project. In addition, the government’s attempt to differentiate itself from the policies of previous governments was confirmed to be a constraint that actually hindered the project’s progress. This study concludes that if a government facing a complex crisis makes hasty policy decisions, it is likely to repeat the policy pattern or institutional path of previous governments. It also argued that in this situation, policy choices that aim to cut a new path may cause the government to choose a wrong path, which may have irreversible consequences.
Read full abstract