The effects of solution heat treatment temperature, cooling rate from this temperature, pre-strain and re-heating on α' martensite formation were examined in Fe-25.5Ni-4Cr steel and 304L steels. The distribution of the potential energy of nucleation sites for α' martensite was also estimated using results obtained in magnetic fields of up to 20.70 MA/m. In Fe-25.5Ni-4Cr steel, solution heat treatment temperature and cooling rate from this temperature had almost no effect on the amount of α' martensite formed in magnetic fields over about 8 MA/m. In contrast, the amount of α' martensite formed in magnetic fields lower than about 8 MA/m increased as solution heat treatment temperature increased and as cooling rate decreased. This cooling rate effect in Fe-25.5Ni-4Cr steel is opposite to that in 304L steel, and the reason for this remains to be clarified. In Fe-25.5Ni-4Cr steel, re-heating almost did not affect the amount of α' martensite. From this result, it was expected that internal strain or lattice defects generated by water-quenching almost do not act as nucleation sites in this steel. In Fe-25.5Ni-4Cr steel, pre-strain of up to about 10% suppressed the formation of α' martensite and pre-strain over 10% enhanced the formation of α' martensite. Such a change of the amount of α' martensite with pre-strain was reduced as the magnetic field increased. In Fe-25.5Ni-4Cr steel, it was predicted that specimens that were solution heat treated at higher temperatures would have two peaks on the curve of the potential energy distribution of nucleation sites and that the small peak with a high potential energy would he easily annihilated by a small pre-strain. However this peak was not thought to be annihilated by re-heating. On the other hand, the large peak was expected to increase at larger pre-strain. This enhancing effect of pre-strain was not observed in 304L steel even in high magnetic fields. This supported the view that pre-strain suppresses the formation of α' martensite not through work hardening but through the annihilation of nucleation sites. In contrast, in Fe-25.5Ni-4Cr steel, some strain concentration induced by a large pre-strain was expected to generate nucleation sites. As mentioned above, clear differences were revealed in the effects of heat treatments and pre-strain on the formation of α' martensite between Fe-25.5Ni-4Cr steel and 304L steel. This shows that the nature of the nucleation sites and the procedure for the formation of α' martensite differ between these two kinds of steels.
Read full abstract