Slow-fast Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Research Articles

Editorial to irrigated contact‐force sensing catheter may be beneficial for redo ablation of slow–fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in pediatric and adolescent patients

Editorial to irrigated contact‐force sensing catheter may be beneficial for redo ablation of slow–fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in pediatric and adolescent patients

Relationship between the atrial-activation pattern around the triangle of Koch and successful ablation sites in slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

The precise details of atrial activation around the triangle of Koch (ToK) remain unknown. We evaluated the relationship between the atrial-activation pattern around the ToK and success sites for slow-pathway (SP) modification ablation in slow-fast atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Thirty patients with slow-fast AVNRT who underwent successful ablation were enrolled. Atrial activation around the ToK during sinus rhythm was investigated using ultra-high-density mapping pre-ablation. The relationships among features of atrial-activation pattern and success sites were examined. Of 30 patients (22 cryoablation; 8 radiofrequency ablation), 26 patients had a collision site of two wavefronts of delayed atrial activation within ToK, indicating a success site. The activation-search function of Lumipoint software, which highlights only atrial activation with a spatiotemporal consistency, showed non-highlighted area on the tricuspid-annulus side of ToK. In 23 of the patients, a spiky potential was recorded at that collision site outside the Lumipoint-highlighted area. Fifteen cryoablation patients with a success site coincident with a collision site outside the Lumipoint-highlighted area had significantly more frequent disappearances of SP after initial cryoablation (46.7% vs. 0%, p = .029), fewer cryoablations (3.7 ± 1.8 vs. 5.3 ± 1.3, p = .045), and shorter procedure times (170 ± 57 vs. 228 ± 91 min, p = .082) compared to the seven cryoablation patients without such sites. Four patients had transient AV block by ablation inside the Lumipoint-highlighted area with fractionated signals, but no patient developed permanent AV block or recurrence post-procedure (median follow-up: 375 days). SP modification ablation at the collision site of atrial activation of the tricuspid-annulus side along with a spiky potential could provide a better outcome.

High-density mapping of Koch's triangle during sinus rhythm and typical atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia, integrated with direct recording of atrio-ventricular node structure potential.

The mechanism of typical slow-fast atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and its anatomical and electrophysiological circuit inside the right atrium (RA) and Koch's Triangle (KT) are not well known. To identify the potentials of the compact AV node and inferior extensions and to perform accurate mapping of the RA and KT in sinus rhythm (SR) and during AVNRT, to define the tachycardia circuit. Consecutive patients with typical AVNRT were enrolled in 12 Italian centers and underwent mapping and ablation by means of a basket catheter with small electrode spacing for ultrahigh-density mapping and a modified signal-filtering toolset to record the potentials of the AV nodal structures. Forty-five consecutive cases of successful ablation of typical slow-fast AVNRT were included. The mean SR cycle length (CL) was 784.1 ± 6 ms and the mean tachycardia CL was 361.2 ± 54 ms. The AV node potential had a significantly shorter duration and higher amplitude in sinus rhythm than during tachycardia (60 ± 40 ms vs. 160 ± 40 ms, p < .001 and 0.3 ± 0.2 mV vs. 0.09 ± 0.12 mV, p < .001, respectively). The nodal potential duration extension was 169.4 ± 31 ms, resulting in a time-window coverage of 47.6 ± 9%. The recording of AV nodal structure potentials enabled us to obtain 100% coverage of the tachycardia CL during slow-fast AVNRT. Detailed recording of the potentials of nodal structures is possible by means of multipolar catheters for ultrahigh-density mapping, allowing 100% of the AVNRT CL to be covered. These results also have clinical implications for the ablation of right-septal and para-septal arrhythmias.

Systematic observation‐based diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with a bystander concealed nodoventricular pathway

AbstractBackgroundThis study aimed to establish a systematic method for diagnosing atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with a bystander concealed nodoventricular pathway (cNVP).MethodsWe analyzed 13 cases of AVNRT with a bystander cNVP, 11 connected to the slow pathway (cNVP‐SP) and two to the fast pathway (cNVP‐FP), along with two cases of cNVP‐related orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT).ResultsThe diagnostic process was summarized in three steps. Step 1 was identification of the presence of an accessory pathway by resetting the tachycardia with delay (n = 9) and termination without atrial capture (n = 4) immediately after delivery of a His‐refractory premature ventricular contraction (PVC). Step 2 was exclusion of ORT by atrio‐His block during the tachycardia (n = 4), disappearance of the reset phenomenon after the early PVC (n = 7), or dissociation of His from the tachycardia during ventricular overdrive pacing (n = 1). Moreover, tachycardia reset/termination without the atrial capture (n = 2/2) 1 cycle after the His‐refractory PVC was specifically diagnostic. Exceptionally, the disappearance of the reset phenomenon was also observed in the two cNVP‐ORTs. Step 3 was verification of the AVN as the cNVP insertion site, evidenced by an atrial reset/block preceding the His reset/block in fast–slow AVNRT with a cNVP‐SP and slow–fast AVNRT with a cNVP‐FP or His reset preceding the atrial reset in slow–fast AVNRT with a cNVP‐SP.ConclusionAVNRT with a bystander cNVP can be diagnosed in the three steps with few exceptions. Notably, tachycardia reset/termination without atrial capture one cycle after delivery of a His‐refractory PVC is specifically diagnostic.

Irrigated contact force sensing catheter for redo ablation of slow–fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in pediatric and adolescent patients: A case series

Irrigated contact force sensing catheter for redo ablation of slow–fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in pediatric and adolescent patients: A case series

Termination of slow-fast atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia by a single cryoablation of the slow pathway guided by a fractionation map.

This is a slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) case wherein the fractionation map-guided cryoablation of the slow pathway (SP) successfully terminated the tachycardia. In this case, the Advisor™ HD Grid catheter and fractionation map in the EnSite™ X EP system with relatively high-sensitive settings were useful for detecting the target SP area. Direct AVNRT termination by cryomapping at the fractionated potential area might be a quick and safe ablation strategy, which may provide a new workflow for SP ablation.

Fractionated Potential-Guided Slow Pathway Ablation for Slow-Fast Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in a Patient With Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava Using Ultra-High-Density Mapping.

Fractionated Potential-Guided Slow Pathway Ablation for Slow-Fast Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in a Patient With Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava Using Ultra-High-Density Mapping.

Activation pattern within Koch's triangle during sinus rhythm in patients with and without atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Several studies have visualized the slow pathway during sinus rhythm using high-density mapping of Koch's triangle (KT) in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, it is unclear whether the slow pathway can be visualized in all people. Therefore, we evaluated the activation pattern within KT during sinus rhythm in patients with and without AVNRT. High-density mapping using the Advisor HD Grid mapping catheter (Abbott) within KT during sinus rhythm was created in 10 patients with slow-fast AVNRT and 30 patients without AVNRT. In 8 (80%) patients with AVNRT, the activation pattern pivoting around a block line (BL) within KT was observed. In 12 (40%) patients without AVNRT, similar activation pattern pivoting around BL was observed, but jump was observed in 11 (92%) of these patients. In all patients, the activation pattern pivoting around BL was observed in 17 (85%) of 20 patients with jump, but only 3 (15%) of 20 patients without jump (p < 0.0001). During jump, there was a long period of no potential from the last atrial potential within KT to the His bundle potential, suggesting the slow pathway conduction through the rightward inferior extension that cannot be visualized. A linear ablation between the pivot point and the septal tricuspid annulus was successful for slow-fast AVNRT. Although the slow pathway could not be visualized using high-density mapping during sinus rhythm, the activation pattern pivoting around BL within KT was observed in most patients with the dual pathway physiology, with or without AVNRT.

Last Entrainment Sequence: A Novel Diagnostic Technique for Atrial Tachycardia Mimicking Other Supraventricular Tachycardias.

Adenosine-sensitive re-entrant atrial tachycardia (AT) originating from near the atrioventricular (AV) node or AV annulus resembles other supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs), and the differential diagnosis is sometimes challenging. This study sought to develop a novel technique to distinguish adenosine-sensitive re-entrant AT from AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT). The study retrospectively studied 117 re-entrant SVTs that were successfully entrained by atrial overdrive pacing (AOP) (27 adenosine-sensitive re-entrant ATs, 63 AVNRTs, 27 ORTs). If the second atrial electrogram after AOP (A2) at the earliest atrial activation site (EAAS) accelerated to the pacing cycle length, the EAAS was considered orthodromically activated. Then, we compared the sequence of A2 and the last entrained His bundle (H∗) and QRS complex (V∗). The study hypothesized that the last entrained impulse would activate the EAAS before it enters the AV node, His bundle, and ventricle during AT (A2-H∗-V∗) but would activate the EAAS after the His bundle activation during AVNRT and ORT (H∗-V∗-A2 or H∗-A2-V∗). Orthodromic EAAS activation was documented during AOP in 84 SVTs (72%) when performing AOP from sites proximal to the entrance of SVTs. A2-H∗-V∗ responses were observed in 21 of 25 ATs, but were never for AVNRTs or ORTs. All ORTs and fast-slow AVNRTs had H∗-V∗-A2 responses. Eleven of 21 slow-fast AVNRTs had H∗-A2-V∗ responses. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the A2-H∗-V∗ response for diagnosing AT were 84%, 100%, 100%, and 94%, respectively. The last entrainment sequence was useful for differentiating ATs with diagnostic difficulties.

Electrogram characteristics at successful cryoablation sites in slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

PurposeCryoablation is a safe alternative to radiofrequency (RF) ablation for slow-fast atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT); however, optimal electrogram parameters for site selection remain unknown. We retrospectively investigated local electrograms for slow pathway (SP) modification in cryoablation. MethodsForty-five consecutive patients with slow-fast AVNRT who underwent cryoablation using a 6-mm-tip catheter were enrolled. Electrogram parameters for sites of successful SP modification (success-sites) were investigated; these included the interval between atrial activation at His and the last deflection of SP potential, defined as the His(A)-SPP interval. In 8 patients, 3-dimensional mapping by multi-electrode catheter was performed pre-ablation for more detailed SP assessment. ResultsTwenty-seven of 45 patients had successful SP modification by 1 cycle of freeze-thaw-freeze cryoablation at a single site with a low amplitude and fragmented SP potential. Among a total of 76 cryoablation sites in all patients, the His(A)-SPP interval at success-sites (45 sites) was significantly longer than that at unsuccess-sites (31 sites) (86 ± 9 vs.78 ± 10 msec, p < 0.0001). The AV amplitude ratio was not significantly different between success-and unsuccess-sites (0.21 ± 0.22 vs.0.25 ± 0.23, p = 0.429). The cutoff value of the His(A)-SPP interval for successful cryoablation was 82 msec with a sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.71 (AUC: 0.739; 95%CI: 0.626–0.852; p < 0.0001). Three-dimensional mapping in all 8 patients showed that sites with the most delayed atrial activation and the last deflection of the fragmented SP potential within the Koch's triangle coincided with success-sites. ConclusionA longer His(A)-SPP interval and fractionated SP potential were characteristics of successful cryoablation for SP modification in slow-fast AVNRT.

Case report: Wide-complex tachycardia one week post-CRT-D implantation in a patient with pre-existing left bundle branch block

A 37-year-old female with dilated cardiomyopathy, whose baseline ECG showed sinus rhythm with left bundle branch block pattern, received a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRTD). One week post-implantation, she presented to the emergency department with palpitations, diaphoresis and chest discomfort. ECG showed a wide-complex tachycardia (WCT) episode, which spontaneously converted to sinus rhythm, and was later diagnosed as typical slow-fast atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. This report outlines the differential diagnoses for WCT and the reasoning behind the eventual diagnosis, taking into consideration the device interrogation findings and results of the electrophysiology study.

Not-so-typical typical atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia in an adolescent

Dysrhythmias are commonly encountered in the Emergency Department (ED). Timely management and recognition of dysrhythmia in the ED is essential and crucial. Physicians working in the ED should be familiar with atypical presentation of common dysrhythmias. This case report illustrates atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with an unusually slow heart rate in an adolescent. A 16-year-old male presented to the ED twice for palpitations. His electrocardiograms showed narrow complex tachycardia with absent P waves. Electrophysiology studies confirmed typical slow-fast AVNRT which was treated successfully with radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway. Diagnosing rare dysrhythmias or common dysrhythmias which manifest atypically can be challenging for non-cardiologists. Although AVNRT generally occurs with a heart rate of &gt;130 bpm, emergency physicians should be aware that AVNRT can take place with a relatively slower rate in both the elderly and young.

Cryofreezing for slow-pathway modification in patients with slow-fast AVNRT: Efficacy, safety, and electroanatomical relation between sites of transient AV block and sites of successful cryoablation.

Cryoablation has emerged as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation for treating atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryoapplication at sites within the mid/high septal region of Koch's triangle and the relation between sites of transient AV block (AVB) and sites of successful cryoablation. Included were 45 consecutive patients undergoing slow-fast AVNRT cryoablation. Initial delivery of cryoenergy was to the mid-septal to high septal region of Koch's triangle. Transient AVB occurred during cryoenergy delivery in 62% (28/45) of patients. Median distance between sites at which cryofreezing successfully eliminated slow pathway conduction and sites of AVB was 4.0 (3.25-5.0) mm. Sites of successful cryoablation tended to be to the left and inferior to the AVB sites. The atrial/ventricular electrogram ratio was significantly lower at sites of successful cryoablation than at AVB sites (0.25 [0.17-0.56] vs. 0.80 [0.36-1.25], p < .001). Delayed discrete or fractionated atrial electrograms were recorded more frequently at sites of successful cryoablation than at AVB sites (78% vs. 20%, p < .001). No persistent AV conduction disturbance occurred, and 96% (43/45) of patients showed absence of recurrence at a median follow-up time of 25.0 months. Cryoablation of slow-fast AVNRT and targeting the mid/high septal region of Koch's triangle was highly successful. AVB frequently emerged near the site at which the slow pathway was eliminated but always resolved by regulating the energy delivery under careful monitoring, and it may be distinguishable by its local electrogram features.

Slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia induced by double ventricular response: A unique electrophysiological finding.

We reported a unique case of slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia induced by double ventricular response with reproducibility.

An unusual presentation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Introduction: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most frequent supraventricular tachycardia, commonly manifesting as autolimited paroxysmal episodes of rapid regular palpitations that exceed 150 beats per minute (bpm), dizziness and pounding neck sensation. Case presentation: We present a case of a male patient, 70 years old, with ischemic heart disease and slow-fast AVNRT treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in March 2019, with regular 6-months follow-ups. He was readmitted in our department in November 2020 for rest dyspnea and incessant fluttering sensation in the neck, without palpitations. The event electrocardiogram (ECG) was initially interpreted by general cardiologist as accelerated junctional rhythm, 75 bpm. Due to the persistence of symptoms and ECG findings, a differential diagnosis between reentry and focal automaticity was imposed. The response to vagal maneuvers and Holter ECG monitoring characteristics provided valuable information. We suspected recurrent slow ventricular rate typical AVNRT, which was confirmed by electrophysiological study and we successfully performed the RFCA of the slow intranodal pathway. Conclusion: AV nodal reentry tachycardia may have an unusual presentation, occurring in elder male patients with structural heart disease. Antiarrhythmic drugs can promote reentry in this kind of patients. In cases of slow ventricular rate, vagal maneuvers and Holter ECG monitoring can help with the differential diagnosis. The arrhythmia can be successfully treated with RFCA with special caution regarding the risk of AV block.

Superior-Type Fast-Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Phenotype Mimicking the Slow-Fast Type.

Superior-type fast-slow (sup-F/S-) atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a rare AVNRT variant using a superior slow pathway (SP) as the retrograde limb. Its intracardiac appearance, characterized by a short atrio-His (AH) interval and the earliest site of atrial activation in the His-bundle, is an initial indicator for making a diagnosis. Among 22 consecutive patients with sup-F/S-AVNRT, 3 (age, 68-81 years) patients had an apparent slow-fast (S/F-) AVNRT characterized by a long AH interval and the earliest site of atrial activation in or superior to the His-bundle region (tachy-long-AH). The diagnosis of sup-F/S-AVNRT was based on the standard criteria in 2 patients and on the occurrence of Wenckebach-type atrioventricular block during tachycardia, which was attributable to a block at the lower common pathway (LCP) below the circuit of the AVNRT, detected owing to the lower common pathway potentials, in one patient. As with the typical S/F-AVNRT, tachy-long-AH was induced after a jump in the AH interval. In contrast to typical S/F-AVNRT, fluctuation in the ventriculoatrial interval was observed during the tachy-long-AH. Ventricular overdrive pacing was unable to entrain or terminate the tachy-long-AH. Moreover, the tachy-long-AH reciprocally transited to/from sup-F/S-AVNRT spontaneously or was triggered by ventricular contractions while the atrial cycle length and earliest site of atrial activation remained unchanged. Both tachycardias were cured by ablation at a single site in the right-side para-Hisian region of 2 patients and the noncoronary aortic cusp of one patient. Collectively, the essential circuit of both tachycardias was identical, and the tachy-long-AH was diagnosed as another phenotype of sup-F/S-AVNRT accompanied by sustained antegrade conduction via another bystander slow pathway breaking through the His-bundle owing to the repetitive antegrade block at the lower common pathway, thus representing a long AH interval during the ongoing sup-F/S-AVNRT. An unknown sup-F/S-AVNRT phenotype exists that apparently mimics the typical S/F-AVNRT and is also an unknown subtype of apparent S/F-AVNRT.

High-density mapping of Koch's triangle during sinus rhythm and typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia: new insight.

Atrial activation during typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) exhibits anatomic variability and spatially heterogeneous propagation inside the Koch's triangle (KT). The mechanism of the reentrant circuit has not been elucidated yet. Aim of this study is to describe the distribution of Jackman and Haïssaguerre potentials within the KT and to explore the activation mode of the KT, in sinus rhythm and during the slow-fast AVNRT. Forty-five consecutive cases of successful slow pathway (SP) ablation of typical slow-fast AVNRT from the CHARISMA registry were included. The KT geometry was obtained on the basis of the electroanatomic information using the Rhythmia mapping system (Boston Scientific) (mean number of points acquired inside the KT = 277 ± 47, mean mapping time = 11.9 ± 4min). The postero-septal regions bounded anteriorly by the tricuspid annulus and posteriorly by the lateral wall toward the crista terminalis showed a higher prevalence of Jackman potentials than mid-postero-septal regions along the tendon of Todaro and coronary sinus (CS) (98% vs. 16%, p < 0.0001). Haïssaguerre potentials seemed to have a converse distribution across the KT (0% vs. 84%, p < 0.0001). Fast pathway insertion, as located during AVNRT, was mostly recorded in an antero-septal position (n = 36, 80%), rather than in a mid-septal (n = 6, 13.3%) or even postero-septal (n = 3, 7%) location. During typical slow-fast AVNRT, two types of propagation around the CS were discernible: anterior and posterior, n = 31 (69%), or only anterior, n = 14 (31%). During the first procedure, the SP was eliminated, and acute procedural success was achieved (median of 4 [3-5] RF ablations). High-density mapping of KT in AVNRT patients both during sinus rhythm and during tachycardia provides new electrophysiological insights. A better understanding and a more precise definition of the arrhythmogenic substrate in AVNRT patients may have prognostic value, especially in high-risk cases. Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias With High Density Mapping System in the Real World Practice (CHARISMA) URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ Identifier: NCT03793998.

Simple differential entrainment screens ablation strategy for slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Ablation of slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (S/F-AVNRT) is occasionally refractory. We hypothesized that the site of ablation for curing S/F-AVNRT can be screened by simple differential atrial entrainment pacing (EP) from the high right atrium (HRA) and proximal coronary sinus (prox-CS). We enrolled 43 patients with S/F-AVNRT who underwent successful differential atrial EP followed by successful ablation of slow pathway (SP) using step-wise approach, and compared the atrio-His (A-H) interval at the recording of His bundle immediately after EP from the HRA [A-H(HRA)], with the interval between atrial deflection at the prox-CS and His bundle electrogram after EP at an identical cycle length from the prox-CS [A-H (prox-CS)]. A typical A-H(CS) shorter than A-H(HRA), consistent with typical SP conduction, was observed in 39 patients (91%), and an atypical A-H(HRA) shorter than A-H(CS) was observed in 4 patients (9%). Successful ablation was obtained at the posteroseptum/midseptum in 32/7 patients with typical responses but only at the midseptum in all 4 patients with atypical responses (P=.0027). The atypical responses predicted a necessity for ablation at the midseptum, with positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 82%, respectively. The mechanism of an atypical response remains unclear but may involve an anatomical variation of Koch's triangle and/or the participation of a variant of the SP, including the superior SP, over which retrograde conduction was observed more frequently in patients with atypical responses (P=.0013). Differential atrial EP predicts the ablation site for successfully curing S/F-AVNRT.

Unique electrophysiological properties of fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia characterized by a shortening of retrograde conduction time via a slow pathway manifested during atrial induction.

Electrophysiological properties of reentry circuits of fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (F/S-AVNRT) may contribute to cyclic variability after atrial induction. In 156 atrial inductions of 33 patients with F/S-AVNRT, we measured the atrio-His (AH) and His-atrial (HA) intervals in the first cycle after the induction (AH[1] and HA[1], respectively), those in the second cycle (AH [2] and HA [2], respectively), and those during tachycardia that maintained a stable cycle length AH[T] and HA[T], respectively), and calculated the value of AH(1) minus AH(T) [ΔAH] and the value of HA(1) minus HA(T) [ΔHA] in each induction. According to the sum of ΔAH and ΔHA, tachycardia variability was classified as incremental (<-20), balanced (-20 to 20), or decremental (>20). ΔAH and ΔHA were significantly different between the three responses: 6 ± 28 and -67 ± 39 in 55 inductions (35%) with an incremental response, 20 ± 10 and -23 ± 28 in 59 (38%) with a balanced response, and 54 ± 44 and 4 ± 50 in 42 (27%) with a decremental response, respectively. Incremental response was reproducibly and consistently observed in 33% of patients. HA(2) was similar to HA(T) in inductions with an incremental response. These results suggest that incremental response can be manifested only in the first cycle when HA(1) is excessively shortened, approximating a retrograde conduction time over a slow pathway, in contrast, and far superior to a decremental delay of AH(1). In specific patients with F/S-AVNRT, poorly recognized, electrophysiological properties of shortening a retrograde conduction time over a slow pathway was manifested during atrial induction.

Ventricular-triggered atrial pacing: A new maneuver for slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Atrioventricular (AV) node duality is suggested by several electrophysiological findings, none of which are strong predictors of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The purpose of this study was to propose a novel maneuver to study conduction over the AV node and attempt to induce slow-fast AVNRT. Ventricular-triggered atrial pacing (VTAP) with decremental VA delay was carried out in 36 consecutive patients with slow-fast AVNRT and in 21 controls after conventional electrophysiology study. Maneuvers were repeated after ablation in patients with AVNRT. VTAP resulted in a hysteretic conduction curve in 21 of 36 patients (58%) in the AVNRT group but only 4 of 21 patients (19%) in the control group (sensitivity 58; specificity 81%). This finding demonstrates sustained conduction in a slow conducting pathway and concealed retrograde conduction over a fast pathway. VTAP resulted in AVNRT induction in 15 of 25 inducible patients at baseline (60%), 4 of which were not inducible with incremental pacing or programmed atrial stimulation. VTAP resulting in a suspended p wave had 51% (39%-64%) sensitivity and 100% (89%-100%) specificity for predicting noninducibility in a given autonomic state. VTAP is useful in patients with suspected slow-fast AVNRT. A hysteretic conduction curve demonstrates sustained conduction over a slow pathway and concealed retrograde conduction through the fast pathway, a finding in favor of slow-fast AVNRT. VTAP may facilitate AVNRT induction and proves to be an interesting complement to classic maneuvers. A suspended p-wave response specifically predicts noninducibility of slow-fast AVNRT in a given autonomic state, providing an interesting surrogate to noninducibility as a procedural end point.