Slow Accrual Research Articles

Analyzing determinants of premature trial discontinuation in leukemia clinical trials

Clinical trials are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Although a significant number of trials are discontinued prematurely, our understanding of factors influencing early termination is limited. We conducted a comprehensive search of ClinicalTrials.gov to identify leukemia trials from 2000 to 2020, followed by data abstraction performed by two independent reviewers. Among 3522 leukemia clinical trials identified, 28.4% were terminated prematurely. Slow accrual was the leading cause of termination 38.2%. The termination rate increased significantly from 17.0% between 2000 and 2005 to 30.9% between 2010 and 2015 (p < .001). Large trials had a lower termination rate than small trials (p < .001). Academic-sponsored trials had the highest termination rates compared to other sponsors’ trials (p < .001). Early-phase trials showed higher termination rates compared to late-phase (p < .001). Other significant factors included a sequential assignment, single-center, and non-randomized trials (p < .001). Much of leukemia trials are terminated prematurely, with slow accrual being the most common reason for early termination.

P18.39.A SEIZURE PROPHYLAXIS IN GLIOMA SURGERY (SPRING): A MULTI-CENTRE, UNBLINDED, RANDOMISED TRIAL

Abstract BACKGROUND 50-80% of all glioma patients will suffer from seizures during their lifetime. Over half of these patients will have drug resistant seizures. Seizure risk is increased peri-operatively, at tumour progression, and shortly before death. Current guidelines do not support routine use of prophylactic peri-operative anti-epileptic drugs (AED) in seizure naïve patients; despite this, levetiracetam is frequently prescribed for this indication. The aim of this trial was to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of prophylactic levetiracetam in seizure naïve patients undergoing surgery for a glioma at reducing the risk of seizures. MATERIAL AND METHODS Seizure naïve patients with newly diagnosed glioma undergoing surgery (biopsy or resection) were randomised (1:1) to receive 12 months prophylactic levetiracetam or no prophylaxis at 14 neurosurgery and neuro-oncology units in the UK. Participants received standard of care neurosurgery and neuro-oncology treatment and were followed until death or for a maximum of one year. The primary outcome was one year risk of first seizure analyzed using a logistic regression model and intention to treat analysis. Outcomes were analyzed by intention-to-treat. The target accrual was 804 participants. This trial was registered with ISRCTN 49474281. RESULTS Between Oct 10, 2019 and Aug 30, 2022, we randomised 96 patients, from 24 to 79 years of age, to levetiracetam (n=49) or no prophylaxis (n=47). Due to slow accrual during the Covid-19 pandemic the trial closed early. In the levetiracetam group there were 43 high grade glioma (HGG) and 6 low grade glioma (LGG), and in the no prophylaxis group there were 43 HGG and 4 LGG. Seventeen (35%) of 49 patients randomised to levetiracetam had a seizure, compared to 15 (32%) of 47 patients randomised to no prophylaxis (OR 1.25, 95%CI 0.49-3.21, p=0.64). Median time to first seizure was 4.8 months in the levetiracetam group and 3.0 months in the no prophylaxis group. In the levetiracetam group 20 (41%) of 49 patients died within 12 months (median overall survival 6.8 months; range 0.2-11.9), and in the no prophylaxis group 15 (32%) of 47 patients died within 12 months (median 4.7 months; range 0.1-12.0). There were no serious adverse events or suspected unexpected serious adverse events related to levetiracetam. CONCLUSION Due to poor accrual caused by the Covid-19 pandemic the SPRING trial closed early and is therefore underpowered. Based on the limited data there was no difference in the 12 month seizure risk in the prophylaxis and no prophylaxis patients undergoing surgery for newly diagnosed glioma. The role of prophylactic anti-epileptic drugs remains undefined.

S1701, A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel With and Without Ramucirumab in Patients With Locally Advanced, Recurrent, or Metastatic Thymic Carcinoma

IntroductionThymic carcinoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy with few treatment options. Preclinical studies suggested that targeting the angiogenic pathway may be beneficial in this disease. MethodsThis randomized phase 2 trial enrolled patients with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic thymic carcinoma. Patients were randomized to receive carboplatin-paclitaxel with or without ramucirumab. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary end points included response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, disease control, toxicity, and overall survival. The primary analysis was done using a one-sided 10%-level log-rank test. Target sample size was 66 patients. ResultsBetween 2018 and 2022, 21 patients enrolled to ramucirumab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (RCP, n = 8) and to the control arm (carboplatin-paclitaxel [CP], n = 13) with one patient on CP not meeting eligibility criteria. Owing to slow accrual, the study was terminated early by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Of the 20 eligible patients, eight on RCP and nine on CP received protocol treatment. PFS was not statistically different (hazard ratio = 0.51, 80% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24–1.09, p = 0.13). There were no grade 4 or higher treatment-related adverse events with RCP, although 50% experienced grade 3 adverse events, in which one patient had a grade 3 thromboembolic event. Among nine assessable patients for toxicity on CP, one patient (11%) encountered grade 4 neutropenia and one patient (11%) reported grade 3 thromboembolic events. Response rates favored the RCP arm, with an 88% (seven of eight, 80% CI: 59%–99%) response rate compared with 40% (four of 10, 80% CI: 19%–65%) on CP arm (p = 0.04). Disease control rate was higher in the RCP arm (100% versus 70%, p = 0.09). At the time of analysis, as only one death has been reported, overall survival remains immature. ConclusionsAccrual to this population is challenging, and the study was closed early because of feasibility. Although PFS was not statistically better with RCP, the hazard ratio was 0.51 and the lack of significance was likely due to small sample sizes. Notably, addition of ramucirumab to CP led to higher response rates than CP alone. Future research should consider exploring larger multicenter trials and other combinations to improve outcomes. Challenges in enrollment emphasize the need for innovative strategies and larger collaborations in rare malignancies such as thymic carcinoma.

Bone Accrual Trajectories in Children and Adolescents with Perinatal HIV Infection.

Low bone mineral density (BMD) has been reported in children and adolescents living with perinatally-acquired HIV (PHIV). Little is known about their bone accrual through puberty compared to an uninfected healthy cohort. To compare bone accrual in PHIV and healthy children. PHIV children aged 7-16 years had dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at entry, 2 years, and then at least 2 years later. Bone accrual was compared to healthy children from the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study (BMDCS). United States academic clinical research centers. 172 PHIV; 1321 BMDCS. We calculated height-adjusted whole-body and spine BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) Z-scores in PHIV using BMDCS reference curves. We fit piecewise weighted linear mixed effects models with change points at 11 and 15 years, adjusted for age, sex, race, height Z-score, and Tanner stage, to compare BMD and BMC Z-scores across actual age by cohort.Main Outcome Measure: BMD/BMC Z-scores. Height-adjusted whole-body BMD and BMC Z-scores in PHIV were lower across age compared to BMDCS children. Spine BMD Z-score across age was higher in PHIV after height adjustment. Whole-body and spine bone area tended to be lower in PHIV. PHIV had slower accrual in whole-body and spine bone area before 14 years. After 15 years, bone area accruals were similar, as were height-adjusted spine BMC Z-scores, across age. PHIV had persistent deficits in all measures except height-adjusted spine BMD and BMC Z-scores. Data are needed on PHIV followed to adulthood.

A phase II, open-label, single-arm trial of pembrolizumab for recurrent meningioma and solitary fibrous tumor.

Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas account for 20% of all meningioma cases. Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a type of soft tissue sarcoma with similar attributes to meningioma. For patients with refractory or recurrent disease after previous surgery or radiotherapy, there is no effective treatment. Pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody, is an effective treatment for various solid tumors. PD-1 ligand is highly expressed in aggressive meningiomas. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in treating meningioma and SFT recurrence after surgery and radiation therapy. This prospective single-arm phase II trial comprised 15 patients with recurrent meningioma and 3 with anaplastic SFT, treated at a single institution during 2018 to 2022. The study was terminated due to a lack of efficacy and slow accrual. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.6 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 40 months. The 6- and 12-month PFS were both 11.1%. The 6- and 12-month OS were 94.4% and 61.1%, respectively. According to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria, the overall response rate was 11%, with 2 patients achieving stable disease and 2 with partial response. Three patients (16.7%) developed grade 3 toxicity. Our results showed that pembrolizumab failed to improve PFS-6 in patients with aggressive meningioma or anaplastic SFT. However, two patients, one with atypical meningioma and one with anaplastic SFT, achieved a partial response. More clinical studies are needed to identify which subset of patients may benefit from this treatment.

A phase Ib trial of isatuximab, bendamustine, and prednisone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Patients with triple-class refractory (TCR) multiple myeloma (MM) often need cytoreductive chemotherapy for rapid disease control. Bendamustine is an outpatient-administered, bifunctional alkylator and isatuximab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody with unique cytotoxicity characteristics. We hypothesized that isatuximab-bendamustine-prednisone would be well-tolerated regimen in TCR MM, and conducted single-center, phase Ib, investigator-initiated study. Patients had TCR MM and last daratumumab exposure ≥ 6 weeks. This study was conducted as a 3 + 3 design to establish the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Isatuximab 10mg/kg IV was administered weekly (cycle 1), and every 2 weeks thereafter. Bendamustine was administered on days 1 and 2 at 3 dose levels (DL): 50, 75, and 100 mg/m2. Methylprednisolone was administered as 125mg on day 1 and prednisone 60mg days 2-4. Common definitions were used for DLTs, adverse events (CTCAE v 5.0), and disease response. Fifteen patients were treated (3 DL1, 6 DL2, 6 DL3). Median age was 71, 53% had high-risk cytogenetics, and 34% had prior BCMA-targeting therapy. One DLT was observed at DL2 (Grade 3 thrombocytopenia plus bleeding). There were no Grade 5 treatment-related AEs. The MTD was not reached. The overall response rate was 20% (3/15) including one stringent complete response. The median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI 0.9-4.1 months). We demonstrated the safety and tolerability of isatuximab-bendamustine-prednisone. Toxicities were mild and manageable with limited intervention. The study was discontinued due to slow accrual. However, we observed responses even among highly refractory patients. This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04083898 on 9/6/2019.

External Beam Radiation therapy After Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone for Treatment of Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial

PurposeTo compare the outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone with those of TACE combined with external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a multicenter randomized study. Methods and MaterialsFrom 2017 to 2022, 74 HCC patients with tumors confined to the liver without vascular invasion were treated with either TACE only (TACE group, 39 patients) or TACE combined with EBRT (TACE+EBRT group, 35 patients). The primary outcome measured was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), local tumor control (LC), and the assessment of treatment-related toxicity. ResultsDue to slow accrual, the trial was closed prematurely after enrolling 74 patients. All patients received two cycles of TACE before randomization. The TACE and TACE+EBRT groups showed comparable patient and tumor characteristics. The TACE group underwent an median of 3 TACE cycles, and the TACE+EBRT group received two cycles of TACE and a median of 5,500 cGy in 15 fractions. For the TACE group, the median LC duration was 13.1 months, while for the TACE+EBRT group, the median LC was not achieved (P<0.001). The PFS was recorded at 11.6 months in the TACE group compared to 15.4 months in the TACE+EBRT group (P=0.072). The median OS reached 36.8 months for the TACE group and extended to 47.1 months for the TACE+EBRT group (P=0.654). The incidence of toxicity was comparable between both groups. ConclusionsAlthough the number of patients enrolled in this clinical trial did not meet expectations. TACE combined with EBRT was shown to be more effective than TACE alone in improving local control (LC) without increasing toxicity, while PFS and OS was slightly improved. TACE+EBRT can be used as a standard treatment option for patients with inoperable but confined intrahepatic HCC.

A phase II randomized trial of talimogene laherparepvec oncolytic immunotherapy with or without radiotherapy for patients with cutaneous metastases from solid tumors

BackgroundCutaneous metastases (CMs) are a manifestation of advanced cancer and can be treated with oncolytic immunotherapy. Laboratory studies suggest radiotherapy (RT) may facilitate response to immunotherapy. We hypothesized that oncolytic immunotherapy with talimogene lapherparepvec (T-VEC, an oncolytic immunotherapy that expresses granulocyte–macrophage colony stimulating factor) and RT would produce response in non-targeted metastases. MethodsA randomized phase 2 trial of T-VEC+/-RT was conducted. Eligible patients had ≥1 CM from a solid tumor amenable to T-VEC and RT and another measurable metastasis. Tumor and overall response was assessed using modified World Health Organization (mWHO) criteria. Adverse events (AEs) and quality of life (QOL) were characterized using CTCAE v4.0 and Skindex-16, respectively. Correlative analyses of tumor genomics and the immune system were performed. Results19 patients were randomized to receive T-VEC (n = 9) or T-VEC+RT (n = 10). One patient in each arm demonstrated complete response in the largest non-targeted metastasis. The trial was closed after the first stage of enrollment because of no overall mWHO responses, slow accrual and the COVID-19 pandemic. AEs were consistent with prior reports of T-VEC. Skin related QOL was poor before and after treatment. Median progression free survival was 1.2 and 2.5 months in the T-VEC and T-VEC+RT arms; median overall survival was 4.9 and 17.3 months in the T-VEC and T-VEC+RT arms. Analyses of peripheral blood cells and cytokines demonstrated responders exhibited several outlying lymphocyte and cytokine parameters. ConclusionsLow overall response rate, slow accrual, and the COVID-19 pandemic led to closure of this trial. Responses in non-injected and non-irradiated metastases were infrequent.

Analysis of the discontinuation and nonpublication of neurooncological randomized clinical trials.

Premature discontinuation and nonpublication of clinical trials contribute to research waste and compromise our ability to improve patient outcomes. However, the extent to which these problems exist in neurooncological randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is not known. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of discontinuation and nonpublication of neurooncological RCTs, identify contributing factors, and assess trial characteristics associated with each. We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study of neurooncological RCTs registered in Clinicaltrials.gov before March 7, 2023. Data were collected from Clinicaltrials.gov and associated publications were located. We attempted to contact authors for all trials without associated publications or an identified reason for discontinuation. Of 139 included RCTs, 57 (41%) were discontinued. The most common reason for discontinuation identified was slow enrollment or accrual (23%), though 30 trials (53%) were discontinued for unknown reasons. Trials funded by sources other than industry or the National Institutes of Health were more likely to be discontinued (odds ratio 4.2, 95% confidence interval 1.3-13.8). In total, 67 of the 139 (48%) RCTs were unpublished, including 50 of the 57 (88%) discontinued studies and 17 of the 82 (21%) completed studies. In our study, discontinuation of neurooncological clinical trials was common and often occurred for unknown reasons. Trials were also frequently unpublished, particularly those that were discontinued. Addressing these findings may provide an opportunity to reduce research waste and improve outcomes for patients with neurological cancers.

Impact of the 2008 MW\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$M_W$$\\end{document} 7.9 Great Wenchuan earthquake on South China microplate motion

Tectonic plate motions drive the earthquake cycle, as they result in the slow accrual and sudden release of energy along plate boundaries. Steadiness of plate motions over the earthquake cycle is a central tenet of the plate tectonics theory and has long been a main pillar in models of earthquake genesis, or of plate-margins seismic potential inferred from slip-deficit estimates. The advent of geodesy in the geosciences and the availability of multi-year-long series of position measurements permit tracking the motions of tectonic plates from before to after the time of significant seismic events that occur along their margins. Here, we present evidence that large earthquakes are capable of modifying the motions of entire microplates. We use high precision Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) position time-series covering the periods 2001–2004 and 2014–2017 to demonstrate that, contrary to the tenet above, the South China microplate motion changed after the 2008 MW\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$M_W$$\\end{document} 7.9 Great Wenchuan earthquake. The GNSS data and associated uncertainties indicate a plate motion slowdown of up to 20% that is beyond the possible impact of data noise and is thus tectonically meaningful. We use quantitative models of torque balance to show that generating this kinematic change requires a force upon the South China microplate compatible with that imparted by the Great Wenchuan earthquake of 2008. The existence of a kinematic signal linked to the earthquake cycle that impacts an entire microplate might offer an additional, novel perspective to assessing the hazards of earthquake-prone tectonic regions.

Neratinib and ado-trastuzumab emtansine for pretreated and untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer brain metastases: Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium trial 022

Treatment options for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) remain limited. We previously reported central nervous system (CNS) activity for neratinib and neratinib-capecitabine. Preclinical data suggest that neratinib may overcome resistance to ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) when given in combination. In Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 022's cohort 4, we examined the efficacy of neratinib plus T-DM1 in patients with HER2-positive BCBM. In this multicenter, phase II study, patients with measurable HER2-positive BCBM received neratinib 160 mg daily plus T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg intravenously every 21 days in three parallel-enrolling cohorts [cohort 4A-previously untreated BCBM, cohorts 4B and 4C-BCBM progressing after local CNS-directed therapy without (4B) and with (4C) prior exposure to T-DM1]. Cycle 1 diarrheal prophylaxis was required. The primary endpoint was the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) by cohort. The overall survival (OS) and toxicity were also assessed. Between 2018 and 2021, 6, 17, and 21 patients enrolled in cohorts 4A, 4B, and 4C. Enrollment was stopped prematurely for slow accrual. The CNS objective response rate in cohorts 4A, 4B, and 4C was 33.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3% to 77.7%], 35.3% (95% CI 14.2% to 61.7%), and 28.6% (95% CI 11.3% to 52.2%), respectively; 38.1%-50% experienced stable disease for ≥6 months or response. Diarrhea was the most common grade 3 toxicity (22.7%). The median OS was 30.2 [cohort 4A; 95% CI 21.9-not reached (NR)], 23.3 (cohort 4B; 95% CI 17.6-NR), and 20.9 (cohort 4C; 95% CI 14.9-NR) months. We observed intracranial activity for neratinib plus T-DM1, including those with prior T-DM1 exposure, suggesting synergistic effects with neratinib. Our data provide additional evidence for neratinib-based combinations in patients with HER2-positive BCBM, even those who are heavily pretreated.

What Is Ailing Oncology Clinical Trials? Can We Fix Them?

Evidence from phase three clinical trials helps shape clinical practice. However, a very small minority of patients with cancer participate in clinical trials and many trials are not completed on time due to slow accrual. Issues with restrictive eligibility criteria can severely limit the patients who can access trials, without any convincing evidence that these restrictions impact patient safety. Similarly, regulatory, organizational, and institutional hurdles can delay trial activation, ultimately making some studies irrelevant. Additional issues during trial conduct (e.g., mandatory in-person visits, central confirmation of standard biomarkers, and inflexible drug dosage modification) contribute to making trials non-patient-centric. These real-life observations from experienced clinical trialists can seem nonsensical to investigators and patients alike, who are trying to bring effective drugs to patients with cancer. In this review, we delve into these issues in detail, and discuss potential solutions to make clinical trials more accessible to patients.

Topical or oral antibiotics in childhood acute otitis media and ear discharge: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

Current guidance suggests oral antibiotics can be considered for children with acute otitis media (AOM) and ear discharge, but there is an absence of evidence regarding the relative effectiveness of antibiotic-corticosteroid eardrops. To establish whether antibiotic-corticosteroid eardrops are non-inferior to oral antibiotics in children with AOM and ear discharge. Open randomized controlled non-inferiority trial set in Dutch primary care. Children were randomized to hydrocortisone-bacitracin-colistin eardrops (five drops, three times per day in the discharging ear(s)) or amoxicillin suspension (50mg per kilogram of body weight per day, divided over three doses administered orally) for 7 days. The primary outcome was the proportion of children with resolution of ear pain and fever at day 3. Between December 2017 and March 2023, 58 of the planned 350 children were recruited due to slow accrual for various reasons. Children assigned to eardrops (n = 26) had lower resolution rates of ear pain and fever at 3 days compared to those receiving oral antibiotics (n = 31): 42% vs 65%; adjusted risk difference 20.3%, 95% confidence interval -5.3% to 41.9%), longer parent-reported ear discharge (6 vs 3 days; P = .04), and slightly higher mean ear pain scores (Likert scale 0-6) over days 1-3 (2.1 vs 1.4, P = .02), but received fewer oral antibiotic courses in 3months (11 for 25 children vs 33 for 30 children), and had less GI upset and rash (12% vs 32% and 8% vs 16%, respectively). Early termination stopped us from determining non-inferiority of antibiotic-corticosteroid eardrops. Our limited data, requiring confirmation, suggest that oral antibiotics may be more effective than antibiotic-corticosteroid eardrops in resolving symptoms and shortening the duration of ear discharge.

Treatment of advanced BP-NETS with lanreotide autogel/depot vs placebo: the phase III SPINET study.

Prospective data are lacking on early somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (BP-NETs; typical carcinoids and atypical carcinoids (TCs and ACs)). SPINET (EudraCT: 2015-004992-62; NCT02683941) was a phase III, double-blind study of lanreotide autogel/depot (LAN; 120 mg every 28 days) plus best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo plus BSC, with an optional open-label treatment phase (LAN plus BSC). Patients had metastatic/unresectable, somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive TCs or ACs. Recruitment was stopped early owing to slow accrual; eligible patients from the double-blind phase transitioned to open-label LAN. The adapted primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) during either phase for patients receiving LAN. Seventy-seven patients were randomized (LAN, n = 51 (TCs, n = 29; ACs, n = 22); placebo, n = 26 (TCs, n = 16; ACs, n = 10)). Median (95% CI) PFS during double-blind and open-label phases in patients receiving LAN was 16.6 (11.3; 21.9) months overall (primary endpoint), 21.9 (12.8, not calculable (NC)) months in TCs, and 13.8 (5.4; 16.6) months in ACs. During double-blind treatment, median (95% CI) PFS was 16.6 (11.3; 21.9) months for LAN vs 13.6 (8.3; NC) months for placebo (not significant); corresponding values were 21.9 (13.8; NC) and 13.9 (13.4; NC) months, respectively, in TCs and 13.8 (5.4; 16.6) and 11.0 (2.8; 16.9) months, respectively, in ACs. Patients' quality of life did not deteriorate and LAN was well tolerated. Although recruitment stopped early and the predefined sample size was not met, SPINET is the largest prospective study to date of SSA therapy in SSTR-positive TCs and ACs and suggests clinical benefit in TCs.

Current trends of clinical trials for older patients with cancer: A systematic review.

1621 Background: While accounting for 40% of the cancer population, older adults are underrepresented in clinical trials. Older-age-selected studies are desirable, but their characteristics and overall performance are unknown. This systematic review assessed design and outcomes of trials focused on this patient population. Methods: We searched Embase and PubMed with the keywords “older adults”, “cancer” and “clinical trials”, from inception to March 1, 2023. We included phase (Ph) I, II and III trials testing systemic therapies in solid cancer patients (pts) aged ≥70 yrs. For each of the selected trials, we carried out an ad-hoc search for age-unselected trials testing the same interventions in the same setting. We followed the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and registered the study on the PROSPERO database (CRD42023465089). Results: We screened 25,868 records and included 313 studies. 48 (15.4%) were Ph I-I/II, 232 (74.1%) Ph II, and 33 (10.5%) Ph III. The minimum-age threshold used to define ‘old’ was 70-74 yrs in 79.9%, 75-79 in 19.8%, and 80 in 0.3% of cases. Most trials (76.7%) were run in the palliative setting. Common tumors included lung (60.4%) and colorectal cancer (15%), while chemotherapy (88.5%) and targeted therapy (23.6%) were the most frequently tested treatments. Non-conventional primary endpoints (e.g., toxicity, feasibility, functional status, quality of life [QoL]) were used in 8.3% of Ph II-III trials. 24 studies were published in 1990-2000, 126 in 2001-2011, and 163 in 2012-2023. The median accrual time was 32 (IQR 21.5-44.5), 30 (IQR 20-43) and 43 months (IQR 36-65) for Ph I, I/II-II, and III, respectively. Of 234 trials reporting the pre-planned target accrual, 77.8% enrolled ≥90% of the required pts. Premature study discontinuation occurred in 50 studies (5.9% of Ph I, 14.2% of Ph II and 39.4% of Ph III), the major reason being slow accrual, while only 9 and 6 closed due to futility and overt efficacy, respectively. Among the 233 trials with a pre-defined statistical hypothesis, 60% met the primary endpoint, including 63.7% Ph I/II-II and 35.5% Ph III trials. Geriatric assessments (GA) and QoL analyses were carried out in 88 (28.1%) and 72 (23%) trials, respectively. Only 18 (5.8%) studies were dedicated to frail pts. Corresponding age-unselected trials were available for 154 older-patient studies. Compared with those, a higher proportion of age-unselected studies enrolled ≥90% of the required pts (95% vs 83.5%, p=0.03) and met the primary endpoint (80.3% vs 63.9%, p=0.03). Conclusions: The interest in clinical trials of solid tumors in older patients has increased over time. While Ph I and II trials are feasible, still a substantial proportion of Ph III trials suffer from slow accrual and premature discontinuation. Interventions to tackle barriers to recruitment should be implemented. Efforts should be made to systematically include GA and QoL analyses, which are key for this patient population.

Durvalumab and consolidation SBRT following chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A single institution pilot study.

e20085 Background: Definitive chemoradiation (CRT) followed by consolidative immunotherapy with durvalumab (IO) demonstrated survival benefit and is now standard of care for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). However, local-regional control (LRC) remains a concern with intrathoracic progression representing the most common site of failure. Adding stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost may enhance the immunogenicity and antigenicity of tumor cells by regulating cell surface receptors and augmenting T-lymphocyte infiltration into tumor. SBRT boost also allows escalated dose to the primary tumor while minimizing dose to critical structures. Methods: Patients with Stage III NSCLC planned for definitive concurrent CRT with 1 year of consolidative IO were prospectively enrolled on a single institutional pilot trial. IO started 6-8 weeks after completion of CRT. SBRT was delivered between cycle 1 and 2 of IO to the residual, primary tumor (20 Gy in 2 fractions for peripheral, 19.5 Gy in 3 fractions for central tumors). Residual tumors needed to be &lt; 120 cc. Lymph nodes were not boosted. Primary endpoints were grade (gr) ≥3 toxicities (CTCAE V4.03) and progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were Overall Survival (OS), LRC, and distant metastasis (DM). A sample size of 25 patients was proposed to determine safety and efficacy. Results: Accrual was slower than anticipated, and the study closed with 11 patients enrolled over 54 months. Slow accrual was due to a low rate of eligibility based on post CRT clinical status and SBRT target limitations. 1 patient withdrew consent before receiving treatment leaving 10 evaluable patients. Median age was 73 years and median CRT dose was 60 Gy (range 60-66 Gy). 6/10 of patient were adenocarcinoma. 5/10 pts had central tumor location. Median follow-up for evaluable patients is 2.2 years. OS was 90%, 70%, and 70% at 1-year, 2-years, and 3 years, respectively. PFS was 90%, 47%, and 47% at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years, respectively. LRC was 100%, 83%, and 63% at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years, respectively. Rates of DM were 0%, 12%, and 34% at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years, respectively. 1 patient developed gr 3 pneumonitis requiring discontinuation of IO. 1 additional patient developed gr 2 pneumonitis requiring a brief pause in IO therapy and resumed IO without any further complications. One patient developed gr 5 myocarditis 29 days after the first dose of IO and 18 days after SBRT, on investigation deemed to be myocarditis secondary to IO. There was no other gr 3 toxicity attributable to IO or SBRT. Conclusions: The addition of SBRT to consolidative IO in stage III NSCLC patients treated with CRT was feasible. The single gr 5 toxicity was attributed to IO. SBRT boost demonstrated encouraging efficacy and manageable toxicity and merits further study. Our data adds to the growing evidence of harnessing tumor immunogenicity in enhancing IO responses. Clinical trial information: NCT03589547 .

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with binimetinib, encorafenib, and cetuximab for BRAF non-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from a phase 2 BIG BANG trial (EPOC1703).

3585 Background: BRAF mutations which are found in 8-12% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) can be classified into three groups; Class 1 and 2 tumors do not respond to anti-EGFR antibody therapy because of the RAS independent activity, while previous studies suggested potential anti-tumor activity of anti-EGFR antibody for class 3 tumor. Combination therapy with binimetinib, encorafenib, and cetuximab showed the substantial efficacy for BRAF V600E mutated mCRC in the BEACON CRC trial, however, the clinical activity of these triplet therapy for BRAF non-V600E mutated mCRC is unknown. Here, we conducted a multicenter phase 2 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with binimetinib, encorafenib, and cetuximab in patients with BRAF non-V600E mutated mCRC. Methods: We enrolled patients with RAS wild-type and BRAF non-V600E mutated mCRC, refractory or intolerant to at least one fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, and no prior history of anti-EGFR antibody (primary analysis cohort) or refractory to prior anti-EGFR antibody (anti-EGFR antibody refractory cohort). Enrolled patients receive binimetinib (45 mg BID), encorafenib (300 mg QD), and cetuximab (initially 400 mg/m2 and subsequently 250 mg/m2, weekly) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in the primary analysis cohort with sample size of 21 patients. Results: Between May 2018 and March 2023, 12 and 20 patients were enrolled in the primary analysis cohort and the anti-EGFR antibody refractory cohort, respectively (same order in the following abstract). 7 and 19 patients had a history of ≥ 2 lines of previous chemotherapy, respectively. The most frequent mutation overall was BRAF D594G (n=14, 43.8%). There were each 2 responders in both cohorts, resulting in 16.7% (95%CI, 2.1-48.4%) and 10.0% (95%CI, 1.2-31.7%) of confirmed ORR, respectively. Among 7 patients harboring class 1 or 2 tumors in both cohorts combined, there were 2 responders (ORR 28.6%). Median progression-free survival was 3.3 months and 3.0 months, respectively. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 4 and 10 patients, respectively, and no new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: The combination therapy with binimetinib, encorafenib, and cetuximab showed modest efficacy for BRAF non-V600E mutated mCRC, with a manageable safety profile, although there was not enough statistical power due to slow accrual. Circulating-tumor DNA analyses at the timepoint of before and after treatment are ongoing. Clinical trial information: UMIN000031857. [Table: see text]

Effect of nivolumab combined with definitive chemoradiotherapy on response rate for esophageal cancer: An immune active intrinsic subtype could be its biomarker—The NOBEL trial.

4068 Background: The usefulness of combined therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and its potential biomarker of treatment efficacy for esophageal cancer remains unclear. We investigated the safety, efficacy, and associated biomarkers of combined therapy with ICI and definitive CRT in operable and inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: This prospective single-arm phase 2 trial was performed at five hospitals in Japan. Patients aged 20–75 years with histologically confirmed ESCC, an ECOG PS score of 0 or 1, and adequate organ and bone marrow functions were eligible. Inoperable patients did not have distant organ metastasis. Patients did not receive any chemotherapy or surgical resection as an initial therapy. Concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy/28 fractions to the primary lesion and 41.4 Gy/23 fractions to the regional LN area) consisted of 4 courses of CF (cisplatin, 75 mg/m2/day, day 1; 5-fluorouracil, 1000 mg/m2/day, days 1–4) plus nivolumab (240 mg/m2/day, every 2 weeks for up to 1 year). The primary endpoint was safety. The incidence rates of nonhematological toxicity grade ≥ 4 and pneumonitis grade ≥ 3 were ≤10% and ≤15%, respectively. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), complete response (CR) rate, and time to esophagectomy-free survival (EFS). Sixty patients were to be accrued, but the trial enrollment was terminated because of slow accrual. This trial was registered as jRCT1091220408. Results: Between January 2019 and September 2021, 42 patients were enrolled. Twenty-five patients had operable disease and 16 had inoperable disease. Two patients (4.8%) experienced grade 3 pneumonitis, suggesting that the primary endpoint was met. The median relative dose intensity of nivolumab was 92.4%. One-year OS, PFS, and EFS rates in all cases were 92.7%, 65.4%, and 78.0%, respectively. One-year OS, PFS, and EFS rates in operable and inoperable cases were 100%, 79.6%, and 84.0% and 81.3%, 43.8%, and 68.8%, respectively. The CR and objective response rates were 73.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.1%–84.3%) and 87.8% (95% CI: 74.5%–94.7%), respectively. The CR rates in operable and inoperable cases were 84% (95% CI: 65.3%–93.6%) and 56.3% (95% CI: 33.2%–76.9%), respectively. Immune high-active intrinsic subtype before treatment (n=4) with an expression score &gt; 80 of 51 immune-related genes showed a high CR rate (100%, n=4), whereas the immune low-active intrinsic subtype (n=37) with an expression score &lt; 80 showed a relatively high CR rate (70%). Conclusions: Nivolumab combined with definitive CRT provided encouraging efficacy and acceptable toxicity in patients with ESCC. Immune high-active intrinsic subtype before treatment has the potential to predict a high CR rate for this combination treatment. Clinical trial information: jRCT1091220408 .

Dual mTOR1/2 Inhibitor Sapanisertib (FTH-003/TAK-228) in Combination With Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Phase II Open-Label Study

BackgroundThe PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is frequently altered at genomic level in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Since mTOR is the last protein in the PI3K signaling cascade, it may have the largest impact on the pathway and has been a focus of targeted therapies. Sapanisertib (FTH-003/TAK-228) is an oral highly selective mTOR1 and mTOR2 inhibitor. NFE2L2 mutations have been described as predictive biomarkers of response in patients with advanced squamous cell lung cancer treated with sapanisertib. Patients and MethodsThis was an open-label, investigator-initiated phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of sapanisertib plus paclitaxel in patients with mUC who had progressed to prior platinum therapy, and the correlation with NFE2L2 mutations in responders. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients were treated with weekly paclitaxel at dose of 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with sapanisertib 4 mg administered orally 3 days per week on days 2-4, 9-11, 16-18, and 23-25 of a 28-day cycle. NFE2L2 mutations were analyzed by Sanger sequencing in responders. Results22 patients were enrolled from May 2018 to April 2020; the trial was halted early due to slow accrual and the COVID-19 pandemic. ORR was 18.2% (n = 4). Disease control rate was 50% (7 SD and 4 PR). Median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI: 1.8-6.1) and median OS was 6.1 months (95% CI: 1.8-13.4). Adverse events (AE) of grade 3-4 were seen in 86% of patients, but no patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. NFE2L2 mutations were not found in responders. ConclusionsAlthough the primary endpoint was no met, sapanisertib and paclitaxel combination demonstrated clinical activity in a heavily pretreated population of mUC. This trial generates insight for future combination of sapaniserib with immunotherapy and/or antibody drug conjugates.

Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour who are in complete radiological remission: a prospective multicentre phase II study.

Metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is considered incurable, and life-long treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is recommended. We investigated whether selected patients with metastatic GIST may remain in durable remission despite imatinib discontinuation. In this 1-group, prospective, multicentre phase II trial selected patients with oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) GIST discontinued imatinib treatment. Eligible patients had been treated with imatinib >5 years without progression and had no radiologically detectable metastases after metastasectomy, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or complete response to imatinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) 3-years after stopping imatinib. Overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) were secondary endpoints. The trial closed prematurely due to slow accrual. Between January 5, 2017, and June 5, 2019, 13 patients were enrolled, of whom 12 discontinued imatinib. The median follow-up time was 55 months (range, 36 to 69) after study entry. Five (42%) of the 12 eligible patients remained progression free, and seven (58%) progressed with a median time to progression 10 months. Median PFS was 23 months and the estimated 3-year PFS 41%. Six of the seven patients who progressed restarted imatinib, and all six responded. Three-year OS was 100%, and all patients were alive at the time of the study analysis. QoL measured 5 and 11 months after discontinuation of imatinib demonstrated improvement compared to the baseline. A substantial proportion of selected patients with oligometastatic GIST treated with imatinib and metastasis surgery/RFA may remain disease-free for ≥3 years with improved QoL after stopping of imatinib.