The high dependence of end point braces on rotational restraint conditions differentiates them from intermediate point braces. Although the point brace stiffness equation of the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) design specifications applies to both braces, it restricts the stiffness to only the buckling load based on the unbraced length and an effective length factor of 1, which is too conservative for end point braces. This study investigated the relationship between end point brace stiffness and column buckling loads through buckling analyses using slope–deflection equations with stability functions, considering diverse supports, end rotation constraints, and column counts. Irrespective of the column count, the columns with end point braces exhibited a non-sway elastic buckling load of up to four times the Euler buckling load depending on the rotational restraint at the column ends. The proposed procedure enhances the AISC regulations by introducing a new equation that allows up to 90% utilization of the buckling load based on the unbraced length and an effective length factor of 1 or less, considering column end rotational constraints. The procedure was applied to six frames undergoing elastic or inelastic buckling and validated by assessing the buckling loads and related point brace stiffness. The proposed procedure significantly enlarged the load-bearing capacity of the column compared with the AISC design procedure, although both approaches obtained comparable point brace cross-sectional areas. It extends the buckling load limit for columns or frames with an end point brace, providing predictive insights into brace stiffness to improve structural design.
Read full abstract