The objective was to evaluate the effect of material (four monolithic zirconia) and surface condition [glazed (G) versus polished after simulation of occlusal adjustment (GAP)] on roughness and volumetric wear (VW) of dental zirconia after chewing simulation (CS). Zirconia specimens (ZS) were fabricated with an approximate diameter of 12.0 mm and a thickness of 1.0 mm. The four types of monolithic zirconia utilized were Prettau 4 Anterior (PA), Lava Plus (LP), Cercon hT (hT), and Cercon xT (xT). All specimens were coated with a thin and uniform layer of Prettau Plus glaze. Additionally, half of the ZS underwent a simulation of occlusal adjustment followed by clinical polishing. The sliding wear test was performed using a chewing simulator set at 30 N, 2 Hz, and 500,000 cycles, employing steatite specimens (SS) to simulate opposing dentition. ZS and SS underwent topographic analysis through optical profilometry to assess volumetric wear (VW) and surface roughness. The average roughness values (μm) of the zirconia ranged from 0.38h (PA-G before CS) to 2.55a (PA-GAP after CS), while for the antagonist the values ranged from 1.3b (LP-G before CS) to 2.6a (PA-GAP after CS). The VW values (mm3) of the ZS ranged from 0.7b (LP-G) to 2.5a (LP-GAP), while for the antagonist the values ranged from 0.17a (xT-GAP) to 0.33a (LP-G). The CS increased the roughness of all materials tested, regardless of the surface condition. The glazed condition showed lower roughness than the glazed/occlusal adjustment/polishing condition before the CS for three zirconia (PA, LP and xT) and after the CS for all materials. The surface condition did not significantly influence volumetric wear (VW) for three materials (PA, hT, and xT); however, for the Lava Plus (LP) group, the glazed condition resulted in reduced VW. The VW of the SS was unaffected by the material type or surface condition. In summary, zirconia specimens that underwent occlusal adjustment followed by repolishing demonstrated increased surface roughness compared to the glazed ones, while their wear behavior varied depending on the type of zirconia used.
Read full abstract