SLEDAI Flare Research Articles

Immunosuppressive therapy withdrawal after remission achievement in patients with lupus nephritis.

Whether immunosuppressive therapy may be safely withdrawn in lupus nephritis (LN) is still unclear. We assessed rate and predictors of flare after IS withdrawal in patients with LN in remission. Patients with biopsy-proven LN treated with immunosuppressants (IS) between 1980 and 2020 were considered. Remission was defined as normal serum creatinine, proteinuria <0.5 g/24 h, inactive urine sediment, and no extra-renal SLE activity on stable immunosuppressive and/or antimalarial therapy and/or prednisone ≤5mg/day. IS discontinuation was defined as the complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy, flares according to SLEDAI Flare Index. Predictors of flare were analysed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Among 513 SLE patients included in our database, 270 had LN. Of them, 238 underwent renal biopsy and were treated with IS. Eighty-three patients (34.8%) discontinued IS, 46 (30) months after remission achievement. During a mean (s.d.) follow-up of 116.5 (78) months, 19 patients (22.9%) developed a flare (8/19 renal) and were re-treated; 14/19 (73.7%) re-achieved remission after restarting therapy. Patients treated with IS therapy for at least 3 years after remission achievement had the lowest risk of relapse (OR 0.284, 95% CI: 0.093, 0.867; P = 0.023). At multivariate analysis, antimalarial maintenance therapy (OR 0.194, 95% CI: 0.038, 0.978; P = 0.047), age at IS discontinuation (OR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.868, 0.997; P = 0.040), remission duration >3 years before IS discontinuation (OR 0.231, 95% CI: 0.058, 0.920; P = 0.038) were protective against disease flares. Withdrawal of IS is feasible in LN patients in remission for at least 3 years and on antimalarial therapy. Patients who experience flares can re-achieve remission with an appropriate treatment.

OP0167 SUCCESSFUL WITHDRAWAL OF MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL IN QUIESCENT SLE: RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED TRIAL

Background:Trials and clinical observations have demonstrated the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for SLE treatment. Long-term use of MMF is associated with adverse events, pregnancy risks, drug monitoring, and increased cost. Current management continues therapy indefinitely. Whether immunosuppression may be safely withdrawn or whether risks of withdrawal outweigh the benefits of continuation is unknown.Objectives:To compare rates of clinically significant disease reactivation (CSDR), major flares, and all flares in patients with quiescent SLE on stable MMF randomized to maintain or withdraw MMF. The goal is to provide guidance for clinicians and patients on the risks of MMF withdrawal.Methods:Adults with quiescent SLE (SELENA-SLEDAI without serologies &lt;4) receiving MMF for ≥2 years for nephritis or ≥ 1 year for non-nephritis were randomized 1:1 to unblinded MMF (maintenance arm, MA) or to a 12-week taper off MMF (withdrawal arm, WA) and followed through 60 weeks. Subjects were on stable hydroxychloroquine; steroids limited to ≤ 10 mg. CSDR, defined as a SLEDAI flare requiring immunosuppression, BILAG flares and adverse events were assessed. Event rates and time to flare were compared using Kaplan-Meier.Results:102 subjects were randomized (50 MA, 52 WA); 1 subject in each arm was ineligible and 10 terminated early (7 MA, 3 WA). Mean disease duration was 13 years; 76% had a history of nephritis; mean baseline SLEDAI was 2.2. 5 MA subjects (10%) had CSDR, compared to 9 WA (17%). Median time to CDSR was 38 weeks in both arms. BILAG A flares occurred in 1MA subject (pancreatitis) vs. 4 WA (cranial neuropathy, panniculitis, 2 nephritis). Kaplan-Meier curves overlapped for CDSR, BILAG A flares, and all SLEDAI flares (Figure). Based on these data, we are 86% confident that the increased risk of CDSR with MMF withdrawal is less than 15% over 60 weeks. AEs were similar between groups; infections occurred more commonly in MA (63 vs. 49).Conclusion:In this cohort of subjects with quiescent SLE on long term MMF serious flares occurred infrequently in subjects continuing or withdrawing MMF without differences in time to flare. MMF withdrawal may be considered in subjects with prolonged quiescent disease.Table 1.Baseline and Demographic CharacteristicsMaintenance armWithdrawal armTotalRandomized5052102Female, n (%)39 (78)47 (90)86 (84)White, n (%)25 (50)19 (37)44 (43)Black, n (%)19 (38)22 (42)41 (40)Hispanic/Latino, n (%)10 (20)12 (23)22 (22)Age, Years, mean (SD)42.4 (12.9)41.6 (12.5)42.0 (12.6)Disease Duration, Years, mean (SD)13.6 (8.2)12.2 (7.9)12.9 (8.0)H/O Lupus Nephritis, n (%)40 (80)38 (73)78 (76.5)On Baseline Steroids, n (%)18 (36)23 (44)41 (40)Prednisone Dose, mg, mean (SD)4.8 (2.7)3.3 (1.7)4.0 (2.3)MMF Duration, Years, mean (SD)6.8 (4.3)6.4 (4.3)6.6 (4.3)Baseline MMF Dose, mg, mean1,6121,6681,640SELENA-SLEDAI*, mean (SD)2.4 (1.76)1.9 (1.76)2.2 (1.77)Positive DsDNA, n (%)35 (70)27 (52)62 (61)Low C31, n (%)14 (28)9 (17)23 (23)Low C41, n (%)6 (12)5 (10)11 (11)Figure.Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Flare EndpointsDisclosure of Interests:Eliza Chakravarty: None declared, Tammy Utset: None declared, Diane L Kamen Consultant of: Consulted on SLE survey development for Lilly and consulted on SLE trial protocol development for EMD Serono in 2019, Gabriel Contreras Grant/research support from: Genentech, Merck, Consultant of: Genentech, Merck, William Joseph McCune: None declared, Kenneth C Kalunian: None declared, Cynthia Aranow: None declared, Megan Clowse Grant/research support from: GSK, Pfizer, Consultant of: UCB, Astra-Zeneca, Speakers bureau: UCB, Ellen Goldmuntz: None declared, Jessica Springer: None declared, Lynette Keyes-Elstein: None declared, Bill Barry: None declared, Ashley Pinckney: None declared, Judith James: None declared

SAT0163 IMMUNOSUPPRESSANT WITHDRAWAL AFTER REMISSION ACHIEVEMENT IN LUPUS NEPHRITIS: EFFECT ON FLARE OCCURRENCE

Background:Whether and when immunosuppressive therapy may be safely withdrawn in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) is still poorly defined. Indeed, there is no clear agreement about the optimal duration of maintenance treatment.Objectives:We aimed at assessing the rate and predictors of flare after IS withdrawal in patients with LN in remission.Methods:Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (ACR criteria) and biopsy-proven LN diagnosed between 1990 and 2019, ever treated with IS and currently in follow-up were considered. IS discontinuation was defined as the complete withdrawal of any immunosuppressive drug in patients in remission. Remission was defined as normal serum creatinine, proteinuria &lt;0.5 g/24h, inactive urine sediment, and no extra-renal SLE activity (clinical SLE Disease Activity Index [c-SLEDAI]-2K=0) on a stable immunosuppressive and/or antimalarial therapy and/or on prednisone ≤5 mg/day. Flares were defined according to SLEDAI Flare Index; renal flare was defined as an increase of proteinuria &gt;0.5 g/24h requiring an increase in corticosteroid therapy or the reintroduction of IS. Predictors of a subsequent flare were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results:Out of 456 SLE patients regularly followed-up, 206 (45.1%) had LN and were considered in our study. Eighty-three patients (40.3%) discontinued IS after remission achievement (Table 1). After stopping therapy, patients were followed for a mean±SD of 99±77 months (range 12-378). Nineteen patients (22.8%) developed a flare after IS discontinuation, after a mean±SD follow-up of 78±68 months (range 7-312), and were re-treated; among them, 6 patients (7.2%) experienced a renal and 13 (15.6%) an extra-renal flare. Compared to patients who flared, patients in persistent IS-free remission had longer remission before IS withdrawal (51.2±31.5 vs. 29.3±16.5 months, p&lt;0.001), and continued antimalarials after IS discontinuation (p=0.005). No differences in flare occurrence according to the type of IS discontinued were found. At multivariate analysis, therapy with antimalarials was the strongest protective factor against disease flare (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.11-0.41, p=0.004) (Table 2). At last follow-up, mean±SD SLEDAI-2K was 3.1±2.8 and 1.5±1.6 in patients who experienced or not a flare after IS discontinuation, respectively (p=0.058), Indeed, 10/19 patients (52.5%) who developed a flare re-achieved remission.Table 1.Characteristics of 83 patients with LN in remission who discontinued immunosuppressive therapy, overall and according to flare occurrenceTotal patients (83)Patients with flare (19)Patients without flare (64)P valueFemale, N(%)72 (88.7)16 (84.2)56 (87.5)nsAge at 2019, years43±1139±11.545±10.40.049SLE duration at 2019, years18±916.7±9.018.6±8.6nsSLE duration at IS discontinuation, years9.7±7.67.1±6.110.5±7.8nsTime to achieve remission, months27±3722.1±35.628.5±37.6nsRemission duration at IS discontinuation, months46±3029 ±16.551±31.5&lt;0.001IS therapy duration, years6.7±4.35.2±3.87.1±4.20.061Anti dsDNA, N(%)65 (78.3)18 (95)47 (73)0.059HCQ after IS discontinuation, N(%)67 (80.7)12 (63.1)55 (85.9)0.005IS, immunosuppressant; HCQ, hydroxychloroquineTable 2.Multivariate logistic regression: predictors of flare occurrenceDependent variable: flare occurrenceOR95% CIp valueNumber of ISs, ever3.2641.030-10.3420.044HCQ therapy after IS discontinuation0.0960.014-0.6520.017Remission duration at IS discontinuation0.9540.912-0.9970.037Cyclophosphamide, ever0.0650.008-0.5480.012IS, immunosuppressant; HCQ, hydroxychloroquineConclusion:Based on our experience, withdrawal of IS is feasible in selected patients with LN, i.e. patients who achieved stable remission and received maintenance therapy with antimalarials. Patients who experience new flares can re-achieve remission with an appropriate treatment.Disclosure of Interests: :Margherita Zen Speakers bureau: BMS, Ely Lilly, Janssen, GSK, Mariele Gatto Speakers bureau: GSK, Francesco Benvenuti: None declared, Francesca Saccon: None declared, Maddalena Larosa: None declared, Luca Iaccarino Speakers bureau: GSK, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Andrea Doria Consultant of: GSK, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Ely Lilly, Speakers bureau: UCB pharma, GSK, Pfizer, Janssen, Abbvie, Novartis, Ely Lilly, BMS

Prevalence and predictors of flare after immunosuppressant discontinuation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in remission.

Patients with SLE are often exposed to prolonged immunosuppression since few data on flare recurrence in remitted patients who discontinued immunosuppressants are available. We aimed to assess the rate and predictors of flare after immunosuppressant withdrawal in SLE patients in remission. SLE patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2018 (according to the ACR criteria), ever treated with immunosuppressants and currently in follow-up were considered. Immunosuppressant discontinuation was defined as complete withdrawal of any immunosuppressive drug. Reasons for discontinuation were remission, defined as clinical SLEDAI-2K = 0 on a stable immunosuppressive and/or antimalarial therapy and/or on prednisone ⩽5 mg/day, or poor adherence/intolerance. Flares were defined according to the SLEDAI Flare Index. Predictors of a subsequent flare were analysed by multivariate logistic regression. There were 319 eligible patients out of 456 (69.9%). Of the 319 patients, 139 (43.5%) discontinued immunosuppressants, 105 (75.5%) due to remission, 34 (24.5%) due to poor adherence/intolerance. The mean (s.d.) follow-up time after immunosuppressant withdrawal was 91 (71) months (range 6-372). Among the patients who discontinued immunosuppressants, 26/105 remitted (24.7%) and 23/34 unremitted patients (67.6%) experienced a flare (P < 0.001) after a median (range) follow-up of 57 (6-264) and 8 months (1-72), respectively (P = 0.009). In patients who discontinued immunosuppressants due to remission, maintenance therapy with antimalarials (OR 0.243, 95% CI 0.070, 0.842) and the duration of remission at immunosuppressant discontinuation (OR 0.870, 0.824-0.996) were independent protective factors against disease flare. SLE flares are not uncommon after immunosuppressant discontinuation, even in remitted patients; however, antimalarial therapy and durable remission can significantly reduce the risk of flare.

Low-dose interleukin-2 therapy in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus: an investigator-initiated, single-centre phase 1 and 2a clinical trial

Summary Background An acquired deficiency of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and related defects in regulatory T cell homeostasis are thought to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. We hypothesised that reconstitution of regulatory T-cell homoeostasis with low doses of IL-2 would be beneficial to patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Methods In this uncontrolled, phase 1 and 2a trial done in the Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology at Charite—University Medicine Berlin (Berlin, Germany), we assessed the safety and tolerability of low-dose recombinant human IL-2 (aldesleukin) and its effects on regulatory T cells. We recruited patients aged 18–75 years with a confirmed diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus and moderate-to-severe disease activity despite previous treatment with at least two conventional therapies. Patients were given four cycles of low-dose aldesleukin daily for 5 days followed by a 9–16 day rest. The primary endpoints were safety and the number of patients who achieved at least a 100% increase in the proportion of CD25hi-expressing cells among circulating CD3 + CD4 + FOXP3 + CD127lo regulatory T cells at day 62 (ie, after four treatment cycles). Secondary endpoints included disease activity as measured by the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) score, disease flares as measured by the SLEDAI flare index, auto-antibody and complement concentrations at day 62. Exploratory endpoints included various cellular and immunological parameters. The trial is registered with WHO/ICTRP, number DRK4858. Findings Between March 31, 2014, and May 27, 2016, 13 patients were screened, of whom ten met eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the trial. Two additional patients were treated between April 1, 2013, and March 11, 2014, in a compassionate use setting. Eleven (92%) of the 12 patients achieved the primary endpoint. 159 adverse events were recorded, 75 (47%) of which were treatment related. Most treatment-related adverse events were transient and mild to moderate (grade 1–2). The most common adverse event was injection-site reaction (20%). No serious adverse events occurred during the treatment period. In ten (83%) of 12 patients, SELENA-SLEDAI scores were lower at day 62 than at baseline, and no severe disease flares were observed during the treatment period. Decreased disease activity correlated with the magnitude of increase in the proportion of activated regulatory T cells. IL-2 treatment resulted in a preferential proliferation of regulatory T cells that retained suppressive capacity. We observed decreases in cells that are involved in the regulation of germinal-centre reactions. Interpretation Low-dose IL-2 therapy is safe and well tolerated and selectively promotes the expansion of functional regulatory T cells in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Low-dose IL-2 treatment might also be beneficial in reducing disease activity, although larger trials are needed to address efficacy. Funding German Research Foundation.

Varicella zoster virus infections increase the risk of disease flares in patients with SLE: a matched cohort study

ObjectiveTo explore whether varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection could increase the risk of disease flares in patients with SLE.MethodsPatients who had VZV reactivations between January 2013 and April 2018 were...

THE EFFICIENCY OF BIOLOGICAL THERAPY AND THE FEATURES OF HUMORAL IMMUNITY IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Objective: to investigate the effect of various biological agents (BAs), including combined treatment with rituximab (RTM) and belimumab (BLM), on the activity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to evaluate their efficacy and impact on some parameters of humoral immunity.Subjects and methods. BAs were prescribed to 54 patients with a reliable diagnosis of SLE with high and medium activity according to SLEDAI-2K; 40 of them received RTM, 7 – BLM; 7 – combined therapy with RTM and BLM. Clinical and laboratory examinations were made in all the patients at the time of their inclusion and then every 3 months during a year. The results were assessed using SLEDAI-2K, BILAG index, Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI Flare index (SFI) (a moderate, severe exacerbation), and SLE Responder Index (SRI).Results and discussion. At 3, 6, and 12 months after start of therapy, the use of BAs in all the patients resulted in a disease activity reduction. It was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.00001) in the RTM group; and no statistical analysis was carried out in the BLM and RTM+BLM groups due to the small numbers of patients. At the same time, there was a progressive decrease in the levels of anti-double-stranded DNA (ds-DNA) antibodies (Abs) and an increase in the concentration of the complement fractions C3 and C4 in the RTM and RTM+BLM groups (p &lt; 0.05) at one-year follow-up. After 12 months of therapy with BAs, there was a decrease in IgG (p &lt; 0.02) and IgM (p &lt; 0.03) levels; but overall it remained within the reference ranges. Prior to therapy, irreversible organ damages were recorded in 23 (42.6%) of the 54 patients. The increased damage index at 12 month was observed only in patients receiving RTM, which is probably due to the use of higher-dose glucocorticoids.Conclusion. All three methods of therapy with BAs in SLE patients demonstrated good efficiency shown as a significant decrease in clinical and laboratory activity measures that were assessed by SLEDAI-2K and the levels of anti-ds-DNA and complement components C3 and C4. The decrease in immunoglobulin levels did not go beyond the reference values. Therapy with BLM and RTM+BLM allowed for managing patients with the low and average doses of oral glucocorticoids, which contributed to the reduction of not only the activity, but also risk of irreversible organ damages.

OP0044 Effects of Atacicept on Disease Activity in Patients with Moderate to Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: APRIL-SLE Randomized Trial

BackgroundAtacicept is a fusion protein that inhibits B-cell stimulating factors BLyS and APRIL. Levels of these factors are elevated in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Atacicept 150 mg (A150) was associated...

THU0287 Assessment of the Impact of Medication Criteria on the Selena Sledai Flare Index: Potential for Overating Flare Severity in Clinical Trials for Lupus

BackgroundThe classic SELENA SLEDAI flare index (cSFI) has been extensively used for assessment of flares in SLE with the purpose of differentiating severe flares from those falling in the mild/moderate...