Origin of garnet in skarn (magmatic vs. hydrothermal) and the prograde skarn fluid evolution are still controversial. Two generations of garnet (Grt1, Grt2) were identified at the Tongshankou deposit: Grt1 is anisotropic with oscillatory zoning and resorbed boundary, whilst Grt2 grew around Grt1 and formed oscillatory rims. In-situ LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of Grt1 and Grt2 yielded a lower intercept 206Pb/238U age of 142.4 ± 2.8 Ma (n = 57; MSWD = 1.16) and 142.3 ± 9.6 Ma (n = 60; MSWD = 1.06), respectively, coeval with the ore formation and ore-related granodiorite emplacement. Positive Eu anomaly, non-CHARAC Y/Ho value and low TiO2 content, together with the mineral assemblages indicate that both Grt1 and Grt2 have a hydrothermal origin. The existence of melt and melt-fluid inclusions in Grt1, together with similar LREE-enriched patterns to the granodiorite, further indicate that Grt1 may have formed in the magmatic-hydrothermal transition. Higher U contents and LREE-enriched patterns of Grt1 indicate that fluid I is mildly acidic pH and low fO2. The inner gray Grt2 rims (Grt2A) is HREE-enriched with low U contents, indicating that fluid II has nearly neutral pH and high fO2. The wider Y/Ho range and LREE-enriched patterns of the outer light-gray Grt2 rims (Grt2B) show that the evolved magmatic fluid II had mixed with an external fluid, characterized by being mildly acidic pH and with high fO2. Our results suggest that the prograde skarn-forming fluids can be multistage at Tongshankou, and the mixing of meteoric water may have been prominent in the prograde skarn stage.
Read full abstract