In a major contribution to our understanding of early postconquest society, Robinson A. Herrera focuses on the colonial city of Santiago de Guatemala. Founded by Pedro de Alvarado in 1524 and established on its present site in Panchoy Valley in 1543, Santiago is today the popular tourist destination known as Antigua Guatemala. Until its destruction by earthquake in 1773, Santiago was Spanish Central America’s principal administrative, commercial, ecclesiastical, and cultural center, the seat of a royal audiencia for most of the colonial period, and a city that ultimately boasted a population of some 40,000 souls, making it one of the most significant regional urban centers in the Americas.Thanks to Antigua’s agreeable climate, beautiful physical setting, and charming colonial ruins, as well as the availability in nearby Guatemala City of rich and well-organized documentation, Santiago has long attracted scholars’ attention. A fair share of it has gone to the sixteenth century, but no one yet has approached Guatemala’s formative generations with the vision, determination, and minute attention to detail that characterizes Herrera’s effort. Inspired by James Lockhart’s early work on sixteenth-century Peru, the author has patiently sought out the ordinary doings of ordinary people, as reflected primarily in the notarial registers that hold the wills, property conveyances, powers of attorney, partnership papers, labor contracts, and similar documents, which provide clues to the daily experience of the great majority of the city’s population. Herrera also makes good use of criminal records, civil suits, and official correspondence. Skilled at the deft juxtaposition of scattered bits of information, he portrays a city that, even in the first generation, was already beginning to flourish as a commercial hub, a center for artisan production, and a magnet for migrants from nearby indigenous communities, neighboring isthmian provinces, and even more distant places in the Americas and Europe.Thanks to Christopher H. Lutz’s indispensable 1994 demographic study of Santiago (Santiago de Guatemala, 1541 – 1773: City, Caste, and the Colonial Experience, Univ. of Oklahoma Press), the multiethnic complexity of the colonial city’s popular classes is already familiar to us, but Herrera goes a step beyond Lutz, not only in descriptive detail but also in painstaking reconstruction of daily interactions among persons of differing social classes and racial and cultural backgrounds. While power, privilege, and high social status remained concentrated at the top of a rigid hierarchy rooted in traditional Spanish values and prejudices, Santiago is revealed as a place where ordinary European colonists — far from disdaining manual labor and petty commerce — scrambled to make a living, often in close association with natives, Africans both free and slave, and the usual variety of persons of mixed ancestry. More than half of the book is devoted to non-elite Europeans: not only Spaniards (although they were certainly the majority) but also Italians, Portuguese, and the odd Irishman. Substantial chapters also address the experiences of Santiago’s numerous indigenous inhabitants, as well as its population of blacks and mulattoes. In an effort to bring gender in as well, Herrera takes periodic account of the roles played by women, either directly or indirectly, in the social and economic life of the community.The strength of this important book is also in some ways its weakness. The method pioneered by Lockhart and adapted so masterfully to the Guatemalan case by Herrera provides a view of the past not available elsewhere, but it also imposes certain limitations, not the least of which is the difficulty of generalization from scattered and partial evidence, sometimes from only one or two observed cases. Some readers may find Herrera too daring in this regard, such as when he concludes on the basis of only two labor contracts that free blacks were paid more than mestizos for similar work (p. 126). But Herrera’s sources and reasoning are generally visible, so that readers are free to evaluate them and to accept or reject them. On another issue, more attentive fact checking might have helped Herrera to avoid the occasional “nuisance” error — Puerto de Caballos placed on the Pacific coast rather than the Caribbean (p. 29), the Council of Indies seated at Havana (p. 107), slaves imported from New Guinea rather than Guinea (p. 118) — but none of these is central to the book’s purpose or argument, and, in the end, such slips do not diminish the author’s real achievement.That achievement is, in fact, substantial. Robinson Herrera’s book greatly enriches the historiography of sixteenth-century Guatemala. It introduces us to real people with real concerns, whose lived experience did not always conform neatly to the comfortable categories into which we are accustomed to sort the social realities of the early Spanish period. As such, it warrants the careful attention not only of specialists on colonial Central America but also of students of the social history of early Latin America in general.