Sirolimus In Renal Transplant Recipients Research Articles

Effects of CYP3A5 Genetic Polymorphisms on the Weight-adjusted through Concentration of Sirolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Sirolimus, one of the immunosuppressive drugs administered to renal transplant recipients, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5. Accordingly, CYP3A5 polymorphism is a genetic factor affecting sirolimus pharmacokinetics (PK). Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between sirolimus PK and CYP3A5*3 polymorphism. We searched for studies published up to 13 June 2024 from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We reviewed studies on the relationship between CYP3A5*3 polymorphism and weightadjusted trough concentration/dose (C/D) ratio and dosage of sirolimus in renal transplant recipients, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We evaluated mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of seven studies were included. The weight-adjusted C/D ratio of sirolimus was significantly higher in patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 rather than CYP3A5*1/*1 or CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype (MD 95.27 ng/mL per mg/kg; 95% CI: 58.06, 132.47; I2 = 74%; p < 0.00001). Also, the weight-adjusted dosage of sirolimus was significantly lower in patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 rather than CYP3A5*1/*1 or CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype (MD -2.60 × 10-3 mg/kg; 95% CI: -4.52, -0.69; I2 = 44%; p = 0.008). Our meta-analysis showed a significant effect for the CYP3A5*3 genotype on weight-adjusted C/D ratio and dosage of sirolimus in adult renal transplant recipients.

Sirolimus in renal transplant recipients with malignancies in Germany.

BackgroundRenal transplant recipients have an increased cancer risk. The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor sirolimus (SRL) has immunosuppressive and antitumour activities but knowledge about its use in recipients with cancer is limited.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed 726 renal allograft recipients converted to SRL from 10 German transplant centres. Patient and graft survival were analysed depending on malignancy status prior to conversion and tumour entity.ResultsMalignancy before conversion to SRL was reported in 230 patients, with 137 patients having skin cancers and 101 having solid cancers. Cancer occurred 4.6 ± 9.4 (median 3.0) years after transplantation. Basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and Bowen’s disease were the most prevalent skin cancers, while carcinomas of the kidney, colon and breast were the most prevalent solid cancers before conversion. Patients with prior malignancy were older and had better renal function at conversion compared with patients without a history of cancer. After conversion to SRL, cancer incidence rates (IRs) of all tumours were lower compared with rates before conversion. Cancer IRs after conversion were higher in patients with malignancy before conversion compared with those without. Patient survival was worse in patients with solid cancers compared with patients with skin cancers or without malignancies. Biopsy-proven acute rejections in the first year after conversion were less frequent in patients with malignancy compared with those without. Graft survival and renal function in all cancer types were better than in patients converted to SRL without cancers.ConclusionsConversion to SRL in patients with a history of cancer is safe regarding renal function and graft survival, while patient survival is largely dependent on tumour entity.

The effect of ABCB1 polymorphism on sirolimus in renal transplant recipients: a meta-analysis.

BackgroundSirolimus (SRL) is an immunosuppressive drug and substrate of the P-glycoprotein (P-GP) encoded by ABCB1. The relationship between ABCB1 polymorphism and the pharmacokinetics of SRL in different studies were conflicting in renal transplant recipients. Thus, this meta-analysis aims to investigate the influence of ABCB1 C3435T, C1236T, and G2677T/A polymorphisms on the dose-adjusted trough level (C/D) of SRL in renal transplant recipients.MethodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. The quality of each eligible study was assessed according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The STATA 15.0 was adopted to perform the meta-analysis. The fixed-effects model was used for pooled results with low heterogeneity (I2 ≤50%); otherwise, the random-effects model was used.ResultsA total of 6 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results of pooled analysis showed no significant association of SRL C/D ratio with ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism. The subgroup analysis based on different ethnic groups and different time-points after SRL initiation in renal transplant recipients were also conducted. No significant association was observed in these subgroups. Significant associations were showed between ABCB1 C1236T polymorphism and the C/D ratio of SRL in the homozygous model (TT vs. CC; WMD: −45.54; 95% CI: −75.15, −15.94; P=0.003), and also in subgroup of Caucasian (TT vs. CC; WMD: −46.57; 95% CI: −91.90, −1.25; P=0.044 and TT vs. CC + CT; WMD: −52.10; 95% CI: −95.38, −8.82; P=0.018). Significant differences were found in association between the ABCB1 G2677T/A polymorphism and the C/D ratio of SRL, including the homozygous model (TT vs. GG; WMD: −76.47; 95% CI: −126.37, −26.58; P= 0.003), the heterozygous model (GT vs. GG,WMD: 178.62; 95% CI: 125.03, 232.22; P= 0.000), the dominant model (GT + TT vs. GG; WMD: 82.23; 95% CI: 36.28, 128.17; P=0.000), the recessive model (TT vs. GG + GT; WMD: −179.38; 95% CI: −283.33, −75.42; P=0.001), and the over-dominant model (GT vs. GG + TT; WMD: 199.44; 95% CI: 84.84, 314.05; P=0.001).ConclusionsNo significant association exists between ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism and the C/D ratio of SRL in renal transplant recipients. To achieve target therapeutic concentrations, ABCB1 C1236T homozygous mutant TT genotype will require a higher dose of sirolimus than wild type GG, especially in Caucasian renal transplant recipients. ABCB1 G2677T/A TT genotype will also need a higher dose of sirolimus genotype. Genotyping of ABCB1 might help to improve the individualization of SRL for renal transplant recipients. Further studies are expected to provide high-quality evidence.

Platelet activation markers after conversion from azathioprine to sirolimus based immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients

Under immunosupression with sirolimus (rapamycin) procoagulant effects and platelet activation have been controversially discussed. We evaluated patients of a prospectly designed substudy as part of a randomized trial investigating the effect of a switch from non-mTOR-based immunosuppression to sirolimus in renal transplant recipients. Our substudy consisted of 7 patients who switched therapy from azathioprine to sirolimus (conversion group) and 8 patients who remained on azathioprine (controls) before (V1) and after (V2) 3 months of treatment. In all patients we assessed flowcytometric markers of platelet activation (PAC-1), platelet degranulation (CD62P), formation of platelet leukocyte-aggregates (PLA), monocyte activation (CD11b), endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and platelet aggregation. Both groups were similar in terms of baseline demographics and had stable transplant function for at least 6 months. CD62P increased significantly in the control group (p < 0.03). PLA were significantly reduced in the sirolimus conversion group at V2 (p < 0.02), whereas no effect was seen in the controls. Expression of PAC-1, CD11b, ETP-peak, ETP-time to peak, ETP-AUC and platelet aggregation showed no significant changes in both groups compared to V2. From clinical data, performing in depth platelet function testing, we found no evidence for increased platelet activation parameters in RTR who switched therapy from azathioprine to sirolimus.

Impact of CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine and sirolimus in renal transplant recipients

Calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine, CsA) and mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus, SRL) - immunosuppressants used to prevent allograft rejection after renal transplantation - have a narrow therapeutic index and show considerable inter-individual pharmacokinetic differences. Differences in expression and activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 3A5 affect these pharmacokinetics; cytochrome activity differences are associated with CYP genetic polymorphisms. This study evaluated the effects of polymorphisms in CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 on immunosuppressive drug-dose adjusted trough blood concentrations. One hundred renal transplant recipients were genotyped for CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 using PCR-RFLP. Blood concentrations of CsA and SRL were determined by EMIT and HPLC/UV, respectively. The allelic frequencies of CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 in the study group were 2.5% and 96.5%, respectively. The mean cyclosporine dose in CYP3A4*1/*1B subjects was 455.04±128.68 mg/day vs. 261.68±64.72 mg/day in CYP3A4*1/*1 subjects (p<0.001). The mean cyclosporine dose-adjusted trough blood concentrations (ng/ml per mg/kg body weight) in CYP3A4*1/*1B subjects were lower than in the CYP3A4*1/*1 group (37.06±10.38 vs. 44.63±13.99; p<0.218). The mean cyclosporine dose in CYP3A5*1/*3 subjects was 400.65±164.97 mg/day vs. 263.52±64.39 mg/day in CYP3A5*3/*3 subjects (p<0.022). No association was detected between sirolimus trough blood concentration (C0) or dose requirement, and CYP3A4 or CYP3A5 genotype. Genetic polymorphisms in CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 may underlie inter-individual differences in cyclosporine pharmacokinetics after renal transplantation. Patients with at least 1 functional CYP3A5*1 or CYP3A4*1B allele require significantly higher doses of cyclosporine to reach target drug levels compared to patients with the CYP3A4*1 or CYP3A5*3 alleles.

Effect of early conversion from CNI to sirolimus on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with allograft dysfunction

Studies evaluating the effect of conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to sirolimus (SRL) in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) have shown conflicting results, and only few short-term uncontrolled studies are available in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction. This is the first controlled study to evaluate long-term survival and both renal and cardiac outcomes in nondiabetic RTRs with allograft dysfunction who were converted from CNI to SRL. We evaluated 13 RTRs with biopsy-proven allograft dysfunction who underwent early conversion from CNI to SRL, and 26 controls with normal graft function taking CNI. All continued both steroids and mycophenolate mofetil. SRL was titrated to trough levels of 4-8 ng/mL. Outcome measures included 3-year event-free survival, acute rejection rate and 3-year changes in Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and left ventricular mass index (LVMi) as assessed by echocardiography. Compared with controls, patients on SRL showed better 3-year event-free survival (p=0.024; log-rank test), significant eGFR increase (+5.5 ± 8.9 vs, -6.4 ± 14.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2, p=0.011), LVMi regression (-9.0 ± 7.6 g/m(2.7) vs. 1.0 ± 10.1 g/m(2.7), p=0.0038) and similar acute rejection rate. Three-year change in eGFR was the only significant predictor of event-free survival by Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio = 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.99; p=0.017), whereas SRL was the strongest predictor of both eGFR increase (beta coefficient, 0.342; p=0.01) and LVM reduction (beta coefficient, -0.609; p=0.0001) by multivariate regression analysis. Conversion from CNI to SRL in RTRs with allograft dysfunction proved to be associated with better survival, improved renal graft function and regression of cardiac hypertrophy.

Conversion from Calcineurin Inhibitors to Sirolimus Maintenance Therapy in Renal Allograft Recipients with Risk Factors

Background: The efficacy and safety of conversion treatment with sirolimus in renal transplant recipients using the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) with one or more risk factors was evaluated. Methods: Ninety-three renal transplant recipients were prospectively enrolled. CNIs(CsA and FK506) as main immunosuppressant were converted to SRL immunosuppressant protocol. Rapid conversion with si-rolimus was performed in all patients. The CNI withdrawal was in 2 weeks. At 4 hours after oral administration of cyclosporin A or tacrolimus, the patients took sirolimus. Initial dose of sirolimus was 6 mg, and repeated maintenance dose is 1.0 - 2.0 mg/d. The first concentration of sirolimus was detected at 5 - 7 days after first oral administration, and the target concentration was 6 - 10 μg/L. Results: The symptoms were markedly improved in patients with CNI induced renal toxicity and CNI induced liver toxicity, and the concentration of sirolimus were maintained at (5.1 ± 1.2) μg/L. Serum creatinine levels decreased from (297.72 ± 150.28) μmol/L to (123.76 ± 44.2) μmol/L, and the liver function were recovery in 24 (92.3%) patients. 9 patients with high glucose returned to normal, and 2 patients were improved. Serum creatinine levels decreased more than 25% of primary level in 17 patients, and the effective rate was 51.5%. 10 patients with tumor were appeared 6 - 43 months after renal transplantation, no recurrence was found in 8 of them and 2 patients were dead. Acute rejections were occurred in 3 patients at 6 months after conversion treatment. The complications were included hyperlipidemia and proteinuria. 3 patients were dead, 6 patients returned to dialysis treatment, and 2 patients were removal of grafts. At 3 years after conversion treatment, the survival rates of patients and grafts were 90.9% and 75.8%, respectively. Conclusion: The conversion treatment with SRL and MMF may be a better option for the renal transplant recipients using the CNI with risk factors appeared.

Sirolimus in renal transplant recipients with tuberous sclerosis complex: clinical effectiveness and implications for innate immunity

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is caused by constitutively activated mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) resulting in nonmalignant tumours of several organs and consequently renal failure. Recent reports suggest a possible beneficial role of the mTOR-inhibitor (mTOR-I) sirolimus for TSC; however, safety and efficiency of sirolimus in TSC patients after renal transplantation, both as primary immunosuppressant as well as anti-proliferative agent, are still undefined. Moreover, it is currently unknown whether the TSC mutation affects the primary immune response in these patients. In this article, we report on three TSC patients after renal transplantation who have been converted from a calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression to sirolimus. During 2 years of follow-up, renal allograft function was stable or even improved, and no significant sirolimus-associated side-effects were noted. Beneficial effects of sirolimus against TSC were detected in the skin, along with improved spirometric measurements and an arrest of astrocytoma progression. We show that the inflammatory immune response was significantly altered in TSC patients as compared with controls and sirolimus potently affected both inflammatory cytokine production and vascular endothelial growth factor levels in these patients. Larger studies are warranted to further examine the relationship between clinical parameters and the molecular response to mTOR-inhibition in TSC patients after renal transplantation.

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Conversion to Sirolimus in 85 Renal Transplant Recipients

Treatment with sirolimus (SRL) is a potential therapeutic option for renal transplant recipients, especially those who have developed chronic graft nephropathy (CGN) or a neoplasm. Our aim was to analyze the efficacy and safety of conversion to SRL in renal transplant recipients. We undertook a retrospective study of 85 patients converted to SRL, 47% for tumors, 39% for CGN, and 14% for other causes. The follow-up period was 34 months (range, 1-93 months). Baseline creatinine was 1.8 +/- 0.69 mg/dL (1.6 +/- 0.59 for tumors and 2.3 +/- 0.6 for CGN). At 1 year, the creatinine was the same in both groups: 1.8 mg/dL (P = NS). Graft survival at 12 months was 89% (81% for tumors, 81% for CGN, and 100% for other causes). SRL was withdrawn in 34% of patients: 18% for severe side effects, 7% for patient death, and 9% for graft loss. The serum creatinine and proteinuria were significantly increased among those subjects who returned to dialysis because of CGN compared with those with conserved renal function. Patients who developed pneumonitis showed a lower baseline aMDRD, but no difference in SRL levels. Side effects occurred in 40% of patients, with no difference in renal function, proteinuria, or SRL levels. Renal function showed a significant improvement in the patients who continued SRL (aMDRD 45.7 vs 50.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 12 months; P = .08), more marked among those who converted due to CGN. Increases were seen in levels of serum lipids, as well as in the percentage of patients treated with statins. Proteinuria increased significantly, as did the percentage of patients treated with ACE inhibitors/ARA2. Conversion to SRL in patients with CGN was safe when renal function had not undergone marked worsening and there was no proteinuria. Patients who were converted experienced an improvement in renal function.

Therapeutic Effect of Tripterygium wilfordii on Proteinuria Associated With Sirolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients

Sirolimus (SRL) is a potent immunosuppressive drug used to prevent acute allograft rejection after renal transplantation. Nevertheless, the occurrence of proteinuria has recently been recognized among patients on SRL-based therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effects of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F. (T II) on proteinuria associated with SRL in renal transplant recipients. According to accepting T II, 36 recipients were divided into 2 groups: T II group (n = 21) and valsartan group (n = 15). The T II group was administered 1 mg/kg/d, and the valsartan group, 80 mg twice per day for 12 months. Efficiency was then evaluated. Complete remission: proteinuria decreased by >50%; partial remission: proteinuria decreased by 20% to 50%; ineffective: proteinuria decreased by <20%. Upon 12-month follow-up, the total effective rates in the T II group and the valsartan group were 95.2% and 86.7% ( P < .05), respectively. Twenty of 21 patients with proteinuria in the T II group were negative at 3-month follow-up with disappearance of edema. There were some adverse events that had greater incidence rates in the valsartan group compared with the T II group, such as hyperkalemia (26.7% vs 4.8%). We concluded that the application of T II markedly reduced proteinuria associated with SRL in renal transplant patients.

Observation of Efficacy and Safety of Converting the Calcineurin Inhibitor to Sirolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients With Chronic Allograft Nephropathy

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of converting from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to sirolimus among renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Methods In 16 patients with CAN, substituted sirolimus for CsA or FK506 and observed the incidence of acute rejection and changes in serum creatinine, triglycerides, cholesterol, blood uric acid, and peripheral blood leukocyte/platelet counts within 12 months. All recipients underwent an allograft biopsy before conversion. The targeted sirolimus level was 4–8 ug/L. Results After conversion to sirolimus, the creatinine level of 7 cases decreased and the efficacy rate was (43.8%). No acute rejection occurred during the follow-up. The cases with hypercholesteremia increased from 3 to 7 after conversion; hypertriglyceridemia increased from 3 to 5; leukopenia occurred in 2; subnormal platelet counts increased from 2 to 3; and hyperuricemia increased from 6 to 7. Meanwhile, the average level of peripheral blood leukocytes obviously decreased in the first month, the average peripheral blood cholesterol increased over 12 months, but the average content of peripheral blood platelets, triglyceride and blood uric acid failed to display as statistic difference. Eight patients showed C4d deposition in peritubular capillary in graft tissue before conversion, 7 cases of whom showed no improvement in renal function. In 6 cases there was no C4d deposition in peritubular capillary in graft tissue. Only 2 of 6 cases showed no improvement in renal function. There were 6 patients whose creatinine level was <2.48 mg/dL before conversion, and renal function in 5 of them improved in a year after conversion. In contrast, among 10 patients whose blood creatinine level was >2.48 mg/dL, only 2 cases improved. Conclusion It is safe for patients with CAN to use substitute sirolimus for CNI; the incidence of acute rejection did not increase. In this study, 43.8% of patients showed improved renal function. The main adverse reactions after conversion to sirolimus were hypercholesteremia and decreased peripheral blood leukocytes. The serum creatinine level and the deposition of C4d in peritubular capillary were important factors influencing therapeutic efficacy.

Conversion to Sirolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients with Skin Cancer

Conversion to Sirolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients with Skin Cancer

Proteinuria After Conversion to Sirolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients

Sirolimus (SRL) is a new, potent immunosuppressive agent. More recently, proteinuria has been reported as a consequence of sirolimus therapy, although the mechanism has remained unclear. We retrospectively examined the records of 25 renal transplant patients, who developed or displayed increased proteinuria after SRL conversion. The patient cohort (14 men, 11 women) was treated with SRL as conversion therapy, due to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) ( n = 15) neoplasia ( n = 8); Kaposi’s sarcoma, Four skin cancers, One intestinal tumors, One renal cell carsinom) or BK virus nephropathy ( n = 2). SRL was started at a mean of 78 ± 42 (15 to 163) months after transplantation. Mean follow-up on SRL therapy was 20 ± 12 (6 to 43) months. Proteinuria increased from 0.445 (0 to 1.5) g/d before conversion to 3.2 g/dL (0.2 to 12) after conversion ( P = 0.001). Before conversion 8 (32%) patients had no proteinuria, whereas afterwards all patients had proteinuria. In 28% of patients proteinuria remained unchanged, whereas it increased in 68% of patients. In 40% it increased by more than 100%. Twenty-eight percent of patients showed increased proteinuria to the nephrotic range. Biopsies performed in five patients revealed new pathological changes: One membranoproliferative glomerulopathy and interstitial nephritis. These patients showed persistently good graft function. Serum creatinine values did not change significantly: 1.98 ± 0.8 mg/dL before SRL therapy and 2.53 ± 1.9 mg/dL at last follow-up ( P = .14). Five grafts were lost and the patients returned to dialysis. Five patients displayed CAN and Kaposi’s sarcoma. Mean urinary protein of patients who returned to dialysis was 1.26 (0.5 to 3.5) g/d before and 4.7 (3 to 12) g/d after conversion ( P = .01). Mean serum creatinine level before conversion was 2.21 mg/dL and thereafter, 4.93 mg/dL ( P = .02). Heavy proteinuria was common after the use of SRL as rescue therapy for renal transplantation. Therefore, conversion should be considered for patients who have not developed advanced CAN and proteinuria. The possibility of de novo glomerular pathology under SRL treatment requires further investigation by renal biopsy.

Proteinuria following conversion from azathioprine to sirolimus in renal transplant recipients

Recent studies have reported a significant increase of proteinuria in kidney transplant recipients who were switched from a calcineurin inhibitor (CI) to sirolimus. This has (partly) been ascribed to the hemodynamic renal effects of CI withdrawal. We have evaluated the evolution of proteinuria in renal transplant recipients who underwent conversion from azathioprine to sirolimus. In a randomized, prospective, multicenter study called RESCUE (Recurrent cutanEous Squamous cell Carcinoma Under RapamunE) the efficacy and safety is investigated of conversion to sirolimus in stable renal transplant recipients with a cutaneus squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). In our center 25 patients have been included in this study of which 13 patients were randomized to continue their current immunosuppressive treatment and 12 to conversion to sirolimus. After a mean follow-up of 360 days mean proteinuria increased from 0.37+/-0.34 to 1.81+/-1.73 g/24 h after conversion to sirolimus (P<0.005). In the control group there was no change in proteinuria. A significant increase of proteinuria was observed in all seven patients with proteinuria before conversion, whereas proteinuria remained absent in all patients without previous proteinuria. Two of the patients with proteinuria were converted from cyclosporine and five were converted from azathioprine to sirolimus. Sirolimus was discontinued in five patients with proteinuria, and in all of them proteinuria declined to baseline values. Our study demonstrates that conversion from azathioprine to sirolimus after kidney transplantation may cause a reversible increase of proteinuria. Sirolimus-induced proteinuria therefore cannot be ascribed to the hemodynamic renal effects of withdrawal of CI.

Sirolimus Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacogenetic Analysis and Bayesian Modelling in Kidney Transplant Recipients

The objectives of the present study were: (i) to analyse the population pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in renal transplant recipients co-administered mycophenolate mofetil, but no calcineurin inhibitor over the first 3 months post-transplantation and study the influence of different potential covariates, including genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolic enzymes and active transporters, on pharmacokinetic parameters; and (ii) to develop a Bayesian estimator able to reliably estimate the individual pharmacokinetic parameters and exposure indices in this population. Twenty-two adult renal transplant patients treated with sirolimus participated in this study. Ninety concentration-time profiles (938 sirolimus whole blood samples) were collected at days 7 and 14, and months 1 and 3 post-transplantation. The population pharmacokinetic study was conducted using the nonlinear mixed effects model software, NONMEM, and validated using both the bootstrap and the cross-validation approaches. Finally, a Bayesian estimator based on a limited sampling strategy was built using the post hoc option. A two-compartment open model with first-order elimination and Erlang's distribution (to describe the absorption phase) best fitted the data. The mean pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were 5.25 h(-1), 218L and 292L for the transfer rate constant, the apparent volume of the central and peripheral compartments, respectively. The CYP3A5*1/*3 polymorphism significantly influenced the apparent oral clearance: mean oral clearance = 14.1 L/h for CYP3A5 non expressers (CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype) versus 28.3 L/h for CYP3A5 expressers (CYP3A5*1/*3 and *1/*1 genotypes). The standard errors of all the parameter estimates were <15%. Maximum a posteriori Bayesian forecasting allowed accurate prediction of sirolimus area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours using a combination of only three sampling times (0, 1 and 3 hours post-dose), with a non-significant bias of -2.1% (range -22.2% to +25.9%), and a good precision (root mean square error = 10.3%). This combination is also easy to implement in clinical practice. This study presents an accurate population pharmacokinetic model showing the significant influence of the CYP3A5*1/*3 polymorphism on sirolimus apparent oral clearance, and a Bayesian estimator accurately predicting sirolimus pharmacokinetics in patients co-administered mycophenolate mofetil, but no calcineurin inhibitor.

Evolution of Proteinuria After Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNI) to Sirolimus (SRL) in Renal Transplant Patients: A Multicenter Study

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to sirolimus (SRL) has become an option in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy or other conditions. However, in some cases an increase of proteinuria has been reported after such therapeutic intervention. The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical course of this so far unexplained proteinuria after conversion. We performed a retrospective analysis evaluating 94 renal transplant patients from various Spanish centers. Proteinuria (629 determinations) and clinical developments were analyzed between 6 months before and 6 months after conversion. Patients were divided into three groups according to mean proteinuria before conversion (group A: <300 mg/d; group B: 300 to 2000 mg/d; and group C: >2 g/d). The mean proteinuria level was 1.69 g/24 h (n = 312 determinations) before and 2.36 g/24 h after conversion (n = 317 determinations; P = .006), which corresponds to an overall increase of 25% (1.55 to 1.69 g/24 h considering only determinations of 1 month before and 1 month after conversion; P = NS). We could not detect any clear correlation between proteinuria and serum creatinine nor between changes of proteinuria and changes of serum creatinine. A variance analysis for repeated measures showed an increase in proteinuria compared to the preconversion values ( P = .003), and when the three groups of preconversion proteinuria were evaluated separately it could be observed that this change in the evolution of proteinuria was almost completely dependent of an increase in the group C (preconversion proteinuria greater than 2 g/d; P = .03), whereas in the other two groups changes were almost irrelevant. Finally, the switch to SRL in renal transplant recipients is followed by an increase in the level of proteinuria predominantly dependent of an increase in patients with high levels of preconversion proteinuria, whereas it seems to be irrelevant in patients without or with light or moderate proteinuria. These results suggest that this might not be a direct effect of SRL.

Trimethoprim–sulphamethoxazole does not affect the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in renal transplant recipients

The influence of the trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole combination on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of sirolimus, a potent macrocyclic immunosuppressant, was studied in renal transplant recipients. Fifteen kidney transplant recipients were treated with sirolimus 8-23 mg m(-2) in combination with azathioprine and prednisolone from the day of transplantation. Whole blood sirolimus AUC and C(max) were determined on days 6 and 7 after transplantation. On day 7, sirolimus was coadministered with the first dose of trimethoprim (80 mg) and sulphamethoxazole (400 mg). On day 6, the mean (95% confidence interval) whole blood sirolimus AUC((0-24 h)) was 1040 (846, 1234) ng ml(-1) and mean C(max) was 109 (88, 129) ng ml(-1). Corresponding values on day 7 were AUC((0-24 h)) 1060 (826, 1293) ng ml(-1) and C(max) mean 107 (87, 127) ng ml(-1). The mean difference in the dose-corrected AUC((0-24 h)) was 0.40% (-9.4, +10). A single dose of trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole does not affect the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in renal transplant patients.