Dixmier traces are usually defined by means of functionals on $$\mathfrak {l}_\infty (\mathbb {N})$$ that are invariant under the forward dilation $$\begin{aligned} D_+: (\sigma _1,\sigma _2,\sigma _3,\sigma _4,\dots \;) \mapsto (\sigma _1,\sigma _1,\sigma _2,\sigma _2,\dots \;) \end{aligned}$$ and $$\mathfrak {c}_0$$ -singular, which means that they vanish at all null sequences. The backward dilation $$\begin{aligned} D_-: (\sigma _1,\sigma _2,\sigma _3,\sigma _4,\dots \;) \mapsto (\sigma _2,\sigma _4,\sigma _6,\sigma _8,\dots \;) \end{aligned}$$ can be used, as well. Note that $$D_-$$ -invariant functionals automatically vanish on $$\mathfrak {c}_0(\mathbb {N})$$ . As observed by Sukochev and coauthors, any requirement concerning dilation invariance can be dropped when working on $$\mathfrak {L}_{1,\infty } (H)$$ . It just suffices to assume that the generating functionals vanish on $$\mathfrak {c}_0(\mathbb {N})$$ . So it seems to be a good idea to present the theory of Dixmier traces on the bases of an adapted definition. We carry out this project. Although the fundamental results remain unchanged, their interplay becomes a quite different appearance. Even more is possible. Looking at the conclusions Hahn–Banach Theorem $$\mathfrak {c}_0$$ -singular functional Dixmier trace, we may wonder whether the intermediate step is necessary. Indeed, there exists a sublinear function on the underlying operator ideal $$\mathfrak {L}_{1,\infty } (H)$$ that directly yields all proper Dixmier traces via the Hahn–Banach Theorem. So the theory of Dixmier traces can be turned upside down: