Single Venous Anastomosis Research Articles

Prophylactic Venous Supercharging in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Surgery: A Retrospective Dual-Center Study.

Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is nowadays considered the gold standard in breast reconstruction. However, venous congestion is still a leading cause of free flap failure. Despite the conspicuous articles regarding the use of a secondary venous anastomosis, there is a lack in the literature regarding the prophylactic use of a secondary venous route to reduce the incidence of complications during breast reconstruction. A double-center retrospective study based on women undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction was conducted, dividing patients into case group (DIEP flaps with double venous anastomosis) and control group (DIEP flaps with single venous anastomosis). Demographic and surgical data and complications were compared and statistically analyzed, and a reconstructive algorithm was proposed to improve the flap insetting. In total, 154 patients were included in the study, divided into case group (74 patients) and control group (80 patients). The median age at the time of surgery was 49.09 years (range: 29-68 years), slightly lower in group 1 when compared with group 2. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.52 kg/m2 (range: 21.09-29.37 kg/m2), in particular 25.47 kg/m2 (range: 23.44-28.63 kg/m2) in group 1 and 25.58 kg/m2 (range: 21.09-29.37 kg/m2) in group 2. No statistical differences were found between groups in terms of BMI and smoking and comorbidities history. The average operative times were 272.16 minutes (range: 221-328 minutes) in group 1 and 272.34 minutes (range: 221-327 minutes) in group 2, with no significant difference between groups, as well as ischemia time (44.4 minutes in group 1 [range: 38-56 minutes] and 49.12 minutes in group 2 [range: 41-67 minutes]). Statistical analysis showed a reduction in short-term complications and a statistically significant reduction for take-backs in the two groups. Our study suggests that venous supercharging of DIEP flap by performing dual venous anastomosis can be routinely and safely done prophylactically, and thus not only after intraoperative assessment of venous congestion, to avoid flap venous congestion and decrease the rates of re-exploration.

A comparative study of clinical outcome in ALT free flap reconstruction using superficial or deep and single or dual recipient vein anastomosis in different sites

AbstractBackgroundDuring the free flap surgery obtaining a suitable recipient vein is an important factor for successful outcome. As in all other flaps even in ALT flap, single or double venous anastomosis, superficial or deep venous anastomosis is still a matter of debate among the micro vascular surgeons. Though dual vein anastomosis is a time‐tested method, single vein anastomosis has the advantage of reducing the operative time and hospitalization cost. Similarly, in situation where the deep veins are dubious superficial veins are savior. This study explores the outcome of ALT flap using different system of recipient veins.Patients and MethodsRetrospective analysis of the 54 free ALT flaps performed over a period of 5 years from June 2017 till June 2022, was carried out. Out of 54, 38 (63%) were male patients and 16 (37%) were females. The outcome of the flaps was evaluated in single or dual anastomosis group. Similarly, the outcome of the flaps with deep or superficial vein anastomosis was also evaluated. The flaps outcomes are evaluated as favorable (successful as well as partial loss are considered as favorable) and unfavorable (complete loss of the flap).ResultsAmong the 54 flaps, 31 patients had lower limb reconstruction, majority were post‐traumatic defects. Twenty patients had head and neck reconstruction following post malignancy excision. Three patients had upper‐limb reconstruction for post traumatic and burn injury defects. The outcome was analyzed. Twenty patients had dual vein anastomosis, 90% (18 out of 20) of patients had favorable outcome and 10% (2 out of 20) had unfavorable outcome. Thirty‐four patients underwent single vein anastomosis, 94% had favorable outcome and 6% had unfavorable outcome. The result was not statistically significant as p < .05. Seven patients underwent superficial vein recipient anastomosis, and all flaps were (100%) successful and no failure, whereas out of 27 patients who had undergone deep vein anastomosis 25 (92%) had favorable outcome and 2 (8%) had unfavorable outcome. The results were not statistically significant as p > .05.ConclusionAs in other free flaps venous anastomosis compromise is the cause for flap failure in majority of the times. Whenever possible, dual vein anastomosis should be considered. But when impervious, single vein anastomosis can be resorted to without any hesitation. Similarly, unavailability of deep veins should not deter the surgeons. Superficial veins were a savior in such situation and can be advantageous too.

The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flap: A Novel, yet Challenging and Versatile Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Background In head and neck reconstruction, especially after cancer ablation, choosing the best flap is critical. Due to its thin, lengthy, and malleable vascular pedicle as well as low donor site morbidity, the medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) free flap is gaining popularity among reconstructive surgeons, particularly in oral soft-tissue reconstructions. The goal of this study was to record the clinical use of an MSAP flap in the repair of post-oncologic lesions in the head and neck region. Methodology Patients with oral cancer who came to our center after ablative surgery on the buccal mucosa, tongue, floor of the mouth, and hard palate were repaired utilizing the MSAP flap. Preoperatively, the perforators were discovered using an 8 MHz portable doppler and a computed tomography angiogram. Without the use of a tourniquet, the flaps were delineated and harvested. In all of our patients, a single venous anastomosis was sufficient. Results The MSAP flap was used to positively rebuild 14 cancer patients, with the flap design based on the amount of the resection site or defect. The buccal mucosa (n = 7) and tongue (n = 6) were the most common subsites of the ablative defect. The average flap size was 12 × 6 cm, with a thickness of 5-7 mm. In eight cases, the donor site defect was mostly closed, with the remaining patients receiving split-thickness grafts for subsequent healing. In 12 cases, the best cosmetic and functional results were obtained. One patient developed a postoperative wound infection, and the flap could not be saved. Another patient developed a neck hematoma which had to be debrided on the second postoperative day, with good results. In primary closure cases, patients were mobilized with full weight-bearing on the first postoperative day. Conclusions MSAP flap is an alternative to radial forearm free flap and anterolateral thigh flap in obese patients with medium-sized oral abnormalities. This flap stands out as an outstanding option for head and neck soft-tissue reconstruction due to its unique mix of flap thinness, greater skin region, and superior donor site cosmesis. Despite its importance, just a few case studies and reports have been published. A multicenter trial with a high sample size would demonstrate the use of this flap and its chimeric designs.

One Versus Two Veins in Free Anterolateral Thigh Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

There is considerable debate in the literatureas to whether one or two venous anastomoses are optimal in the anterolateral thigh (ALT) free-flap reconstruction. The literature is currently devoid of a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating these procedures. This review will therefore be the first to address this clinical question. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, two authors (EW and SR) independently searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Case-control, randomised controland observational studies were included. The authors did not include case reports, case series, letters or abstracts.All patients were included regardless of age, co-morbidity status, and the anatomical site of reconstruction. Venous congestion/thrombosis, flap take-back rate due to venous insufficiency, flap lossand operative time were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures included partial flap loss and haematoma formation. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Review Manager 5.4 data synthesis software was used for the analysis. The authors identified eight observational studies, with a total of 1741 patients reviewed, demonstrating a significantly lower flap take-back rate for a double venous anastomosis and a shorter operative time in the single venous anastomosis group. However, other reported measures, including venous congestion and flap loss, showed a non-significant difference (P>0.05). The limitations of the evidence included in this review were that all studies were observational in design. The flap take-back rate is significantly less when anastomosing two veins, and the authors recommend that utilising a second vein can circumvent the caveat of venous compromise.

Single versus dual venous anastomosis in radial forearm free flaps in head and neck reconstruction

A retrospective cohort study of 253 radial forearm free flap (RFFF) procedures in head and neck reconstruction performed in our department between 2005 and 2018 was reviewed. In order to explore the effects between single and dual anastomoses, we applied Fisher’s exact test for statistical analysis. Although no flap failure was identified, more venous compromises were observed in single anastomosis group (5/80 vs. 1/173). We conclude that dual venous anastomoses can reduce venous compromise resulted from unexpected causes in RFFF transfer. Therefore, we especially recommend dual venous anastomoses for those who cannot withstand a second surgery.

Dual Venous Drainage for the Free Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap-Using the Serratus Vein Tributary-Making Virtue of a Necessity.

Background Most flap failures in the lower limb are on account of venous congestion. Literature shows a decrease in the incidence of venous failure when two veins are anastomosed. The thoracodorsal pedicle of the latissimus dorsi free flap affords the possibility of a single venous anastomosis. The lack of a second venous outflow could result in venous congestion in the distal limits of the flap, particularly when long flaps are required for large defects or when the recipient veins are smaller in diameter. Methods We describe a consecutive series of 11 cases of latissimus dorsi flaps for leg and foot defects with a mean defect size of 310 cm 2 , where the serratus anterior vein was used as a second venous outflow channel to ensure maximal venous drainage. Results There were no re-explorations for anastomotic causes. Only one case had partial distal muscle necrosis. There was a delayed anastomotic blowout due to infection resulting in amputation in one case. There was no partial distal muscle necrosis in nine of the ten cases. Conclusion Using the serratus vein as a second venous outflow is of use in reducing incidence of venous occlusion and distal muscle necrosis and can be specially indicated for large flaps and venous diameter discrepancy.

Single Versus Double Venous Anastomosis Microvascular Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Venous congestion accounts for most microvascular free tissue flaps failures. Given the lack of consensus on the use of single versus dual venous outflow, the authors present our institutional experience with 1 versus 2 vein anastomoses in microvascular free flap for head and neck reconstruction. A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients undergoing free flaps for head and neck reconstruction at our institution between 2008 and 2020. The authors included patients who underwent anterolateral thigh, radial forearm free flap, or fibula free flaps. The authors classified patients based on the number of venous anastomoses used and compared complication rates. A total of 279 patients with a mean age of 55.11 years (standard deviation 19.31) were included. One hundred sixty-eight patients (60.2%) underwent fibula free flaps, 59 (21.1%) anterolateral thigh, and 52 (18.6%) radial forearm free flap. The majority of patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III or higher (N = 158, 56.6%) and had history of radiation (N = 156, 55.9%). Most flaps were performed using a single venous anastomosis (83.8%). Univariate analysis of postoperative outcomes demonstrated no significant differences in overall complications (P = 0.788), flap failure (P = 1.0), return to the Operating Room (OR) (P = 1.0), hematoma (P = 0.225), length of hospital stay (P = 0.725), or venous congestion (P = 0.479). In our cohort, the rate of venous congestion was not statistically different between flaps with 1 and 2 venous anastomoses. Decision to perform a second venous anastomoses should be guided by anatomical location, vessel lie, flap size, and intraoperative visual assessment.

One or two venous pedicles by anastomoses for free flaps in reconstruction of the lower extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Microsurgical free tissue transfers are a mainstay of lower extremity reconstruction. Despite being a reliable source of soft tissue, complications do arise. Venous congestion is among the most common causes of flap failure in lower extremity reconstruction, an issue that is attributed to venous stasis and impaired venous return in this region. There remains significant debate whether dual venous drainage improves outcomes. The aim of this study was thus to compare one versus two venous anastomoses in lower limb free flap reconstruction. A systematic review of Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO CINAHL, SCOPUS, Proquest Dissertations and Theses Global, Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO from inception to May 20, 2020, was conducted. Two independent reviewers screened titles and extracted data. Our primary outcome was total free flap necrosis. Secondary outcomes were partial flap necrosis, minor complications, flap reoperation, venous thrombosis, and amputation. Methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria and level of evidence. Three-hundred and fourteen unique titles were identified. All studies were level VI evidence and had a mean MINORS score of 16.1/24. Seven studies (comprising 1499 patients, 910 single venous anastomoses, and 579 double venous anastomoses) met criteria for inclusion. The mean (SD) patient age was 46.5 (7.1) years. Double venous anastomoses did not reduce the rate of minor complications, flap takeback, venous thrombosis, total flap necrosis, or partial flap necrosis when compared to a single vein (all p > .05). In microvascular lower extremity reconstruction, two venous anastomoses did not reduce the rate of minor or major complications.

Dangle Protocols in Lower Extremity Reconstruction

Dangling protocols are known to vary by surgeon and center, and their specific regimen is often largely based on single surgeon or institutional experience. A systematic review was conducted to derive evidence-based recommendations for dangling protocols according to patient-specific and flap-specific considerations. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase-OVID and Cochrane-CENTRAL. Study design, patient and flap characteristics, protocol details, dangling-related complications, and flap success rate were recorded. Studies were graded using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence Scale. Data heterogeneity precluded quantitative analysis. Eleven articles were included (level of evidence (range):IIb-IV; N (range):8-150; age (range):6-89). Dangling initiation, time, and frequency varied considerably. Flap success rate ranged from 94 to 100%. Active smoking, diabetes, and hypertension are associated with characteristic physiologic changes that require vigilance and potential protocol modification. Early dangling appears to be safe across a variety of free flap locations, sizes, and indications. Axial fasciocutaneous flaps may tolerate more aggressive protocols than muscular flaps. While flaps with single venous anastomosis tolerate dangling, double venous or flow-through anastomoses may provide additional benefit. Major limitations included small sample sizes, uncontrolled study designs, and heterogeneous patient selection, dangling practices, monitoring methods, and outcome measures. Significant heterogeneity persists in postoperative dangling protocols after lower extremity microvascular reconstruction. Patient comorbidities and flap characteristics appear to affect tolerance to dangling. We propose two different standardized pathways based on risk factors. Clinical vigilance should be exercised in tailoring lower extremity protocols to patients' individual characteristics and postoperative course.

Comparing Outcomes of Single Versus Double Venous Anastomosis in Free Flap Operation for Lower Extremity Defect Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Free flap operation is a common procedure for reconstructing defects of the lower extremity. However, venous congestion often results in flap failure in lower extremity reconstruction. Dual-vein anastomosis, one proposed solution to overcome this problem, has been controversial in terms of its efficacy. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of dual venous anastomosis on venous congestion and flap failure of the lower extremities.<br/>Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar base, and Embase were searched to identify relevant studies presenting complication rates for groups of patients who had undergone single venous or dual venous anastomosis in lower extremity reconstructions. The relative risks of the following complications between these two groups (single venous and dual venous anastomosis) were calculated: flap failure, flap necrosis, flap congestion, and take-back to operating room.<br/>Results: A total of eight articles and 1,434 flaps were included. Double venous anastomosis was performed for 607 flaps, and single anastomosis for 827 flaps. Etiologies of defects and types of flaps were diverse. There was no significant difference in venous congestion, flap necrosis, or flap failure between the groups with one versus two vein anastomoses. However, the dual venous anastomosis group displayed a trend toward decreasing flap-related complications.<br/>Conclusion: Although there was a trend toward decreasing flap-related complications in the double venous anastomosis group, dual venous anastomosis had no statistically significant protective effects in decreasing free flap failure in the leg.

Superficial versus deep system single venous anastomosis in the radial forearm free flap: a meta-analysis

The selection of the superficial or deep drainage system for use with the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal drainage system for single venous anastomosis. A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis was performed to assess superficial and deep system single venous anastomosis for use with the RFFF in postoperative reconstruction of the head and neck. This study included 1073 flaps (495 superficial system-based flaps, 578 deep system-based flaps) reported in six studies. The outcomes assessed in the studies selected for this meta-analysis included venous compromise, flap failure, and the salvage success rate. Venous compromise was more common in the superficial system group (odds ratio (OR) 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36–3.86, P=0.002). The rate of successful salvage was higher with the superficial system (OR 8.19, 95% CI 1.75–38.3, P=0.008). The rate of flap failure was lower in the superficial system group (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04–2.48, P=0.27). Although the deep system showed a lower risk of venous compromise, the evidence provided by the meta-analysis was insufficient to determine which type of drainage system is more suitable for single venous anastomosis in RFFF. All included studies were cohort studies; therefore, findings must be interpreted with caution.

Double Single-Side Kidney Transplants With Bench Vascular Reconstruction: A Further Challenge Beyond the Marginality Without Future Preclusions

BackgroundDouble kidney transplantation allows the use of marginal kidneys with a significant improvement in the recovery of renal function expected after transplantation, although with a greater anesthesiologic and surgical risk. One-sided positioning, more cautious in the event of functional exhaustion, can be complex due to vascular anomalies. Materials and methodsWe report the case of 2 double unilateral kidney transplants with vascular reconstructions.The first is a double kidney transplant from a 83-year-old donor. Both kidneys (score 5) had 2 arteries and the arterial patch was not usable. A cryopreserved arterial graft was used for the packaging of an arterial axis with which a single T-L anastomosis was performed; the 2 veins were also joined with the packaging of a single anastomosis.The second case is a double kidney transplant from a cadaveric donor performed on a recipient suffering from severe diffuse atheromasia. The right kidney had 2 arteries and the left kidney had 3 arteries (both score 5). The aortic patches and veins of the 2 kidneys were joined together and a single arterial and venous anastomosis was performed. ResultsThe course has been uneventful. In both cases there were no perioperative vascular complications. ConclusionsThe use of marginal organs is an increasingly common reality. Bench vascular reconstructions can further increase donation resources, safely enhancing the transplantation of already marginal organs that would otherwise not be usable and allowing the contralateral vascular axis to be kept intact.

Should 1 or 2 Venous Anastomoses Be Done in Microsurgical Flap Transfer?

Venous compromise is still the most common cause of free flap failure. The need of a second venous anastomosis to prevent free flap failure is controversial. It is proposed that the use of dual venous anastomoses reduces venous compromise. However, some surgeons suggest that dual venous drainage reduces venous blood flow causing a potential risk of thrombosis. This study aimed to compare the frequency of reexploration secondary to venous thrombosis in free flap surgeries in reconstruction of soft tissue defects with 1-vein versus 2-vein anastomosis. We performed a retrospective cohort study including 298 flaps. In 180 of these patients, 2-vein anastomosis was done, and in 118, 1-vein anastomosis was done. The study was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018. The number of venous anastomosis was not associated with flap survival. The group with dual anastomosis required more frequent reexploration as compared with 1 venous anastomosis group (8% vs 1.7%).Outcome and salvage rate were better in the 2-vein group as compared with the 1-vein group (64% vs 50%). There is no difference in flap survival in single or dual venous anastomosis, but we have noticed higher reexploration rates in the 2-vein group. However, outcome is better in the 2-vein group.

Safety of Single Vein Anastomosis versus Double Venous Anastomosis in ALT Perforator Flap in Foot and Leg Reconstruction

Introduction: Single or double venous anastomosis in free flap in general and ALT, in particular, is still a matter of debate between micro vascular surgeons. In this study, we will present our experience in single vein anastomosis versus double venous anastomosis in ALT perforator flap used in leg and foot reconstruction as regarding flap outcome, complications, operation time and the need for re-exploration. Patient and Methods: We retrospectively evaluate 60 patients with post traumatic foot and leg defects in the period between January 2014 and January 2018 where free ALT flap was done. The patients were divided into two groups, Group 1 where single vein anastomosis was done and Group 2 where double venous anastomosis was done; we utilize the deep venous system for the anastomosis in all cases. Results: Complete flap survival noticed in 56 cases (93.3%), defect size ranged from 70 to 200 cm (mean 126.35 ± 33.78). There was no difference between the 2 groups as regarding Flap survival, hospital stay, flap complications, donner site morbidity and vascular insufficiency. There is statistically significant difference between both groups as regarding Ischemia time, Operation time, and overall re-exploration rate. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the use of a single venous anastomosis in the venous drainage of anterolateral thigh free flaps is as safe and feasible as the two veins anastomoses.

Venous Anastomoses in Anterolateral Thigh Flaps for the Lower Extremity: Vessel Selection In Lieu of Obligatory Number.

Dual venous drainage for anterolateral thigh flaps has been proposed to protect against flap-related complications in head and neck applications. Here we report our experience with single vs dual venous anastomosis during lower extremity free-tissue transfer. All free anterolateral thigh flaps for lower extremity reconstruction from 2011 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. An algorithm was used to determine the type and number of venous anastomoses, emphasizing patient anatomy, venous quality, and size match. Patients were divided into single- and dual-venous-anastomosis groups. Univariate analysis determined differences between the groups. A multivariable analysis identified independent risk factors. Fifty patients met the inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, recipient sites, wound type, and flap characteristics were similar in 1 and 2 vein groups. Average follow-up was 9.6 months. Forty-two percent underwent single venous drainage anastomoses. Mean age was 52.7 years, 78.0% were male, and 60% had defects of the foot and ankle. Increased flap area and early dangling did not increase flap demise. Thirty-three percent of single-drainage patients and 31.0% of dual-drainage patients had a complication. A body mass index of greater than 30 kg/m 2 was a predictor for both flap complication ( P = 0.025) and partial flap loss ( P = 0.031) in univariate analysis. No independent predictors were found in multivariate analysis. The number of venous anastomoses, area, and dangling protocol did not influence outcomes while using our lower extremity vein method. Thoughtful evaluation of venous egress should outweigh the routine use of multiple veins in perforator flap reconstructions of the lower extremity.

Single versus double venous anastomoses in head and neck reconstruction: systematic review and cumulative meta analysis

Single versus double venous anastomoses in head and neck reconstruction: systematic review and cumulative meta analysis

Less Is More? Impact of Single Venous Anastomosis on the Intrinsic Transit Time of Free Flaps.

Background The number of venous anastomoses advisable for a free flap continues to be controversial. Intrinsic transit time (ITT) is the time it takes dye during indocyanine green (ICG) microangiography to travel from the arterial to the venous anastomosis. ITT provides information on blood flow velocity and can predict postoperative circulatory complications. This study investigated the effect of the number of venous anastomoses on ITT. Methods The study enrolled 126 patients who had undergone microsurgical reconstruction and intraoperative ICG microangiography. Selection was limited to free gracilis and anterolateral thigh flaps as flaps with a single venous system. The retrospective assessment included reconstruction characteristics of the flaps, clinical outcome, ITT, and the number of venous anastomoses. Results The two groups were homogenous in terms of reconstruction characteristics. The single-venous anastomosis group (n = 75) had a reduced ITT (23.6 ± 11.7 vs. 43.8 ± 23.7 seconds; p < 0.001) compared with the double-anastomosis group (n = 51). A shorter ITT resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of reexploration for anastomotic thrombosis (OR 0.96; p = 0.024). Despite this, a higher reexploration rate tended to occur in the single-venous anastomosis group (9.3 vs. 7.8%; p = 1.0). Conclusion The results highlight the effect of shortening the ITT (thromboprotective blood flow acceleration) by using only one venous anastomosis. However, if the ITT is already at a low enough level with two veins, restriction to one vein does not appear to result in a reduced reexploration rate. For these flaps, the advantages of double-venous anastomosis prevail in terms of a backup drainage.

Use of the retrograde limb of the internal mammary vein to avoid venous congestion in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: Further evidences of a reliable and time-sparing procedure.

Venous congestion is a common cause of DIEP flap failure. When identified intraoperatively, an additional venous anastomosis can improve the venous outflow and prevent flap failure. The aim of this study was to assess if the retrograde limb of the internal mammary vein (IMV) could be considered a good recipient vessel to be used when persistent flap congestion is present, and a second venous anastomosis is required. A retrospective study was conducted in 74 patients who had undergone DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Patients were classified into two groups: SVA (single venous anastomosis) and DVA (dual venous anastomosis). In the SVA group (n = 38), the IMV antegrade limb was used for venous drainage. A single DIEV (Deep Inferior Epigastric Vein) was anastomosed to the superior arm of the IMV. In the DVA group (n = 36), both the antegrade (superior) and retrograde (inferior) stumps of the IMV were used, connecting the larger DIEV to the antegrade IMV and the other DIEV or the SIEV (Superficial Inferior Epigastric Vein) to the IMV retrograde limb. No venous congestion or flap loss was observed when two venous anastomoses were performed using both the IMV antegrade and retrograde limbs (P = 0.3271). In the DVA group, no major complication occurred (P = 0.0453). Operative explorations were significantly reduced in the DVA group (P = 0.0242). These findings suggest that when an additional venous outflow is required, the use of the IMV retrograde limb may help to avoid flap venous congestion. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:447-452, 2016.

Longitudinal Contraction Venoplasty in Prevention of Internal Jugular Vein Thrombosis After Free Flap Vascular Anastomosis

The vascular anastomosis of free flap with the internal jugular vein stump is susceptible to thrombosis, thus resulting in flap compromise or failure. This study aims to explore the method of longitudinal contraction venoplasty in the prevention of internal jugular vein stump thrombosis after free flap vascular anastomosis and its feasibility. A retrospective review was performed of 16 patients who underwent internal jugular vein resection because of cancer ablation and longitudinal contraction venoplasty to prevent internal jugular vein stump thrombosis after free flap vascular anastomosis from January 2013 through December 2014 at Second Xiangya Hospital. The methods for longitudinal contraction venoplasty and its efficacy are reported. Venous anastomosis of all flaps was performed with the internal jugular vein stump, and single venous anastomosis was made in all cases. Postoperatively, all flaps survived completely, without vascular compromise. All the patients were followed for approximately 9 to 33months, and they were satisfied with the esthetic and functional results of the donor and recipient sites after reconstruction. Longitudinal contraction venoplasty may be an effective new method for prevention of internal jugular vein thrombosis after free flap vascular anastomosis.

Safety of a Single Venous Anastomosis in Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap for Extremity Reconstruction

Safety of a Single Venous Anastomosis in Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap for Extremity Reconstruction