Single-segment Lumbar Disc Herniation Research Articles

Orthopedic robot-assisted endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar disc herniation with lumbar instability

To explore the safety and effectiveness of the robot-assisted system for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with lumbar instability. From October 2021 to March 2023, 26 patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal instability were treated with robot-assisted system for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative ambulation activity time, postoperative hospitalization time were record. The intervertebral space height and the lumbar lordosis angle before and after surgery were observed and compared. Pain level was evaluated using the visual analogue scale(VAS). The clinical efficacy was evaluated by Oswestry disability index(ODI). The interbody fusion was evaluated by Brantigan Steffee criteria. All patients successfully completed the operation, the operation time ranged form 105 to 109 min with an average of (150.8±24.1) min. Intraoperative blood loss ranged form 35 to 88 ml with an average of (55.5±16.4) ml. Incision length ranged form 1.4 to 3.5 cm with an average of (2.3±0.8) cm. Postoperative drainage volume ranged form 15 to 40 ml with an average of (28.5±7.8) ml. Postoperative ambulation time ranged form 15 to 30 h with an average of (22.8±4.5) h. Postoperative hospitalization time was 3 to 7 d with an average of (4.2±1.3) d. Total of 26 patients were followed up, the duration ranged from 12 to 16 months with an average of (14.0±1.3) months. The VAS and ODI at 1 week [(2.96±0.72) points, (41.63±4.79)%] and 12 months[(1.27±0.60) points, (13.11±2.45)%] were significantly different from those before surgery[(6.69±0.93) points, (59.12±5.92)%], P<0.01. The height of the intervertebral space (11.95±1.47) mm and lumbar lordosis (57.46±7.59)° at 12 months were significantly different from those before surgery [(6.67±1.20) mm, (44.08±7.79)°], P<0.01. At 12 months after surgery, all patients had no pedicle screw rupture or dislocation of the fusion cage, and the intervertebral fusion was successful. According to Brantigan-Steffee classification, 17 cases were grade D and 9 cases were grade E. Robot-assisted system for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation with lumbar instability improved the accuracy and safety of the operation, and the clinical effect of early follow-up is accurate.

Clinical effect of full endoscopic lumbar annulus fibrosus suture

PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of full endoscopic lumbar annulus fibrosus suture in the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation (LDH).MethodsThe clinical data of patients with single-segment LDH who underwent full endoscopic lumbar discectomy from January 2017 to January 2019 in our hospital were retrospectively analysed. Patients with full endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with annulus fibrosus suture were divided into group A, and those with simple full endoscopic lumbar discectomy were divided into group B. The general information, surgery-related data, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), modified MacNab score at the last follow-up, reoperation rate and recurrence were compared between the two groups.ResultsAll patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months, and the surgical time was 133.6 ± 9.6 min in group A and 129.0 ± 11.7 min in group B. The difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The blood loss of group A was higher than that of group B, and the difference was statistically significant when comparing the groups (p < 0.05). The postoperative symptoms of patients in both groups were significantly relieved, and the VAS score of low back pain and ODI index were significantly lower than the preoperative ones at all postoperative time points (1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, and at the last follow-up) (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). The excellent rate of MacNab at the last follow-up in the two groups were 93.55% and 87.80%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the recurrence rate of group A was significantly lower than that of group B, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05), while the difference between the reoperation rate of the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).ConclusionsFull endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with annulus fibrosus repair reduces the postoperative recurrence rate and achieves satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Effect and complication among different kinds of spinal endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation

To compare clinical efficacy and complication rate of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy(PETD),percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) and unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) in treating single-segment lumbar disc herniation(LDH). From October 2019 to August 2021,121 LDH patients with single-segment treated by spinal endoscopy were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three groups. In PETD group,there were 48 patients,including 19 males and 29 females,aged from 18 to 72 years old with an average of (44.0±13.9) years old;3 patients with L3,4 segments,27 patients with L4,5 segments,and 18 patients with L5S1 segments. In PEID group,there were 43 patients,including 23 males and 20 females,aged from 20 to 69 years old with an average of (40.1±12.1) years old;1 patient with L3,4 segments,15 patients with L4,5 segments,and 27 patients with L5S1 segments. In UBE group,there were 30 patients,including 12 males and 18 females,aged from 29 to 72 years old with an average of (41.2±15.0) years old;1 patient with L3,4 segments,18 patients with L4,5 segments,and 11 patients with L5S1 segments. Operation time,blood loss,fluoroscopy times and complications among three groups were observed and compared. Before opertaion,3 months after operation and at the latest follow-up,visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate low back pain and lower extremity pain,Oswestry disfunction index (ODI) was used to evaluate lumbar function,and modified MacNab was used to evaluate clinical efficacy at the latest follow-up. All patients were performed endoscopic spinal surgery completly and were followed up for at least 12 months. One patient occurred dural sac rupture both in PETD and PEID group,and dural sac rupture was small,and there was no obvious discomfort after operation. Two patients were occurred intraoperative rupture of dural sac in UBE group. One patient was occurred cerebrospinal fluid leakage after operation,and was improved after rest in supine position and fluid rehydration. One patient without no significant postoperative discomfort. (1)There were no significant difference in operating time,blood loss and hospital stay between PETD and PEID group (P>0.05),while UBE group was higher than those of PETD and PEID group (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in fluoroscopy times between PEID and UBE group (P>0.05),but PETD group was higher than that of PEID and UBE group (P<0.05). (2)VAS of low back pain at 3 months after operation in UBE group was higher than that in PETD and PEID group (P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between PETD and PEID group (P>0.05). At the latest follow-up,there was no significant difference in VAS of low back pain among three groups (P>0.05). (3)Lower extremity pain of VAS and ODI among 3 groups after operation were significantly improved at all time points compared with those before opertaion(P<0.05),and there were no statistical significance between groups (P>0.05),and there were no statistical significance in interaction between different time points and operation groups (P>0.05). (4) At the latest follow-up,according to the modified MacNab standard,the results of PETD group were excellent in 27 patients,good in 16 patients,moderate in 4 patients,poor in 1 patient;in PEID group,27 patients got excellent result,12 good,3 moderate,and 1 poor;in UBE group,16 patients got excellent,10 good,2 moderate,and 2 poor. There was no significant difference among three groups (χ2=0.308,P>0.05). Recurrence of lumbar disc herniation occurred in 1 patient among each three groups,symptoms were improved in 2 patients after symptomatic treatment,and 1 patient was treated in other hospitals. PETD,PEID and UBE techniques could achieve good early clinical effects in treating lumbar disc herniation with similar complication rates. Both of PETD and PEID are single-channel minimally invasive surgery,with mild intraoperative tissue damage and quick postoperative recovery; while intraoperative fluoroscopy of PETD was relatively more frequent, and PEID was more suitable for L5S1 segment;UBE is a two-channel surgery,in which the intraoperative soft tissue damage is more severe,but exposure is broad,which is more suitable for complex cases.

Hidden blood loss in three different endoscopic spinal procedures for lumbar disc herniation

Purpose: This study compared hidden blood loss (HBL) among three different endoscopic spinal procedures and investigated its risk factors. Patients and methods: This single-centre retrospective analysis collected data from consecutive hospitalized patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation (LDH) undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE), percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD), or percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) from December 2020 to October 2022. HBL was calculated using Nadler’s and Gross’s formulas. The authors used Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation analysis to explore the relationship between patient characteristics and HBL. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for HBL. Results: In total, 122 consecutive patients (68 females and 54 males) were enroled in this study. The average HBL was 381.87±218.01 ml in the UBE group, 252.05±118.44 ml in the PETD group and 229.63±143.9 ml in the PEID group (P&lt;0.05). Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation analysis showed that operative time, preoperative haemoglobin, preoperative haematocrit, and preoperative Albumin (ALB) were correlated with HBL in the UBE group, while sex, age, operative time, postoperative ALB, and patients’ blood volume (PBV) were related to HBL in the PETD group (P&lt;0.05). Operative time and preoperative activated partial thromboplastin time were related to HBL in the PEID group (P&lt;0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a positive correlation between HBL and operative time in all three groups (P&lt;0.001, P&lt;0.001, P&lt;0.05). Conclusion: HBL was higher in the UBE group than in the PETD and PEID groups, and operative time may be a common risk factor for the three groups.

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for single and double segment lumbar disc herniation with sciatic scoliosis in adults: a retrospective study

ObjectiveSciatic scoliosis can be seen in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a common surgical method for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. The difference between single-segment lumbar disc herniation and double-segment lumbar disc herniation with Sciatic Scoliosis in adults after PELD needs further study. The aim of this study was to compare the imaging features of single-segment and double-segment lumbar disc herniation with Sciatic Scoliosis in adults and to further explore the clinical outcomes of functional improvement and scoliosis imaging parameters of the two groups after PELD.MethodsAdult patients with lumbar disc herniation with sciatic scoliosis who received PELD from January 2019 to June 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the number of operative segments, the patients were divided into a single-segment group and a double-segment group. Perioperative parameters were observed and compared between the two groups. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (JOA) and imaging parameters of the two groups were recorded and compared before the operation and during the follow-up.ResultsA total of 53 patients with single segments and 21 patients with double segments were included in this study. During the follow-up, the VAS score, ODI index and JOA score of the two groups were significantly improved as compared with those before the operation(P < 0. 05). Ninety-two point five percent of single-segment patients and 90.5% of double segment patients returned to normal scoliosis within 12 months after the operation. The operation time, number of intraoperative fluoroscopy times and the amount of intraoperative blood loss in single-segment patients were better than those in double-segment group(P < 0. 05). At the last follow-up, the AVT, CBD and SVA in the double-segment group were 5.2 ± 2.3, 5.1 ± 1.0 and 12.2 ± 3.0 mm, respectively, which were higher than those in the single-segment group (1.9 ± 0.4, 1.1 ± 1.6 and 3.9 ± 2.1 mm) (P < 0. 05).ConclusionPELD is an effective treatment for single-segment and double-segment lumbar disc herniation with Sciatic scoliosis. Double-segment patients can enjoy similar clinical efficacy to single-segment patients, avoiding complications caused by decompression, fusion, and internal fixation. Scoliosis was corrected spontaneously within 12 months after operation, and the sagittal curve was significantly improved in both groups. The improvement of coronal and sagittal balance in double -segment patients may take longer.

Study on the clinical effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy combined with annulus fibrosus repair in the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation in young and middle-aged patients.

To explore the clinical effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) combined with annulus fibrosus repair in the treatment of single-segment lumber disc herniation (LDH) in young and middle-aged patients. Ninty-six patients with single-segment LDH admitted to Baoding First Central Hospital from March 2021 to November 2022 were selected in the retrospective study. The patients were divided into endoscopic group and combined group according to different surgical methods. The surgical conditions, VAS score and ODI score the two groups of patients were compared, as well as the postoperative review results. There were 50 patients in the endoscopic group the average operation time was 43.68 ± 10.77 minutes, the average intraoperative blood loss was 35.38 ± 10.02 ml, there were seven cases of surgical segment recurrence and 10 cases of postoperative intervertebral instability at the surgical segment. There were 46 patients in the combined group, the average operation time was 52.26 ± 8.39 minutes, the average intraoperative blood loss was 39.23 ± 9.02ml, there was one case of surgical segment recurrence and two cases of surgical segment intervertebral instability. The operation time (t=-4.328, P<0.01), postoperative recurrence cases (χ2=4.386, P<0.05) and intervertebral instability cases (χ2=5.366, P<0.05) of the two groups of patients). The difference was statistically significant. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (t=-1.965, P>0.05). For six months after surgery, the differences in VAS and ODI scores between the two groups were statistically significant. In addition, there were statistically significant differences in the VAS scores and ODI scores of the two groups of patients at each time point after surgery compared with those before surgery (P<0.05). The clinical efficacy of PTED combined with annulus fibrosus repair showed better clinical efficacy than PTED alone, and it can reduce the occurrence of surgical segment recurrence and intervertebral instability, suggesting that PTED combined with annulus fibrosus repair may be worthy of promotion in clinical practice.

Retracted: Short-Term Postoperative Pain and Function of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Single-Segment Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Retracted: Short-Term Postoperative Pain and Function of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Single-Segment Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FORAMINAL ROOT BLOCK IN RELIEVING SCIATIC PAIN DUE TO LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION.

To evaluate the clinical profile, pain improvement, and the need for surgical interventions in patients undergoing transforaminal block with the use of corticosteroids and anesthetics. This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with 45 patients with unilateral radicular pain in their lower limbs and a single-segment lumbar disc herniation diagnosis. In the intervention group, transforaminal blocks with bupivacaine, dexamethasone, and clonidine were applied and in the control group, distilled water and bupivacaine. The Oswestry questionnaire was applied. We included 24 female (53.4%) and 21 male patients (46.6%). Of those with an occupation, 85.71% (n = 30) were relieved from their duties due to their illness and 14.29% (n = 5) continued to work with limitations. Those who underwent transforaminal block with an injection of corticosteroids, clonidine, and anesthetics showed immediate relief. However, such effect failed to alleviate patients' symptoms after three weeks. We observed that 52% of patients showed varying degrees of improvement. The control group experienced mild pain relief after one week, which also failed to last after three weeks. Moreover, 50% of patients improved in varying degrees. Further studies with larger samples, new epidemiological data, and longer follow-ups are necessary to validate our hypotheses. Level of Evidence II, Prospective Study.

Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Microendoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation.

This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) through the Wiltse approach (W-TLIF) vs minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (ME-TLIF) in single-segment lumbar disc herniation (LDH). A retrospective study was conducted to study the differences in specific clinical outcomes between single-segment LDH patients receiving W-TLIF and ME-TLIF. Single-segment LDH patients admitted to the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from March 2015 to June 2018 were included. All the participants were divided into the ME-TLIF group or the W-TLIF group according to their TLIF surgery types. Demographic characteristics, the visual analog score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale, blood loss volume, postoperative drainage, ambulated time, initial postoperative back pain, hospitalization duration, expenses, and improvement rates of patients in the two groups were collected for analysis. Radiographic fusion was ultimately assessed via the Bridwell interbody fusion grading system. All selected patients with TLIF were followed up for 1 year. Fifty-seven patients were selected, with 26 in the ME-TLIF group and 31 in the W-TLIF group, both of whom were followed up for 1 year. The mean age of the included patients was 53.75 ± 9.313 years, and the sex ratio was indiscrimination. There was no significant difference in demographic data or operating time between the two groups prior to surgery. The blood loss volume (ME-TLIF: 228.5 vs W-TLIF: 681.3), postoperative drainage (ME-TLIF:82.1 ± 23.5 vs W-TLIF: 345.8 ± 65.2), initial postoperative back pain (ME-TLIF: VAS_3 days: 1.96 ± 0.60 VAS_7 days: 1.73 ± 0.53, W-TLIF: VAS_3 days: 2.48 ± 0.51 VAS_7 days: 1.87 ± 0.43), and hospitalization duration (ME-TLIF: 9.04 vs. W-TLIF: 11.29) were all significantly lower in the ME-TILF group (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in VAS, ODI, and JOA at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively (p > 0.05). The fusion rates of the two groups showed no notable difference (p > 0.05), while the X-ray exposure time in the ME-TLIF group was significantly longer than in the W-TLIF group (p < 0.05). ME-TLIF surgery was an effective and satisfactory surgical technique to manage LDH. Although ME-TLIF increased the operation time and intraoperative fluoroscopic irradiation volume, it could effectively relieve low back pain from early postoperative onset and promote early postoperative recovery compared with W-TLIF.

Comparative study of two elastic fixation systems in single-segment lumbar disc herniation surgery for nucleus pulposus extraction

To investigate the clinical application of two elastic pedicle internal fixation systems in single-segment lumbar disc herniation fenestration. A retrospective analysis of 64 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation treated by surgery from June 2019 to March 2021. According to the different elastic fixation systems placed during the operation, the patients were divided into ordinary pedicle screw elastic rod link group (elastic rod group) and a special elastic pedicle screw rigid rod fixed connection group (elastic screw group). There were 33 cases in the elastic rod group, including 18 males and 15 females, aged from 30 to 69 years old with an average of(49.18±10.23) years old;and 31 cases in the elastic screw group, including 16 males and 15 females, aged from 32 to 68 with an average of (49.81±9.24) years old. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative wound drainage, and postoperative landing time of the two groups were recorded separately. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were compared before and 3, 12 months after operation. The height of the adjacent vertebral space on the lateral DR film before and 12 months after the operation was measured. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by Macnab standard. All the patients successfully completed the operation, and were followed up. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative wound drainage and postoperative landing time in the elastic rod group were(63.73±12.01) min, (89.55±16.07) ml, (81.67±16.00) ml, (3.45±0.75) d , while in the elastic nail group was (62.96±11.54) min, (88.35±17.14) ml, (82.29±15.40) ml, (3.29±0.78) d, the difference was not statistically significant. The symptoms of low back pain and lower extremity numbness were significantly improved in all patients after operation. There was no significant difference in VAS, JOA score and ODI between the two groups before and after surgery (P>0.05). At 12 months after operation, there was no significant difference in the height of the adjacent vertebral space between the upper adjacent vertebral body and the same segment before operation(P>0.05), and there was no significant difference between the groups before and after the operation. According to Macnab criteria, the elastic rod group was excellent in 30 cases, good in 2 cases, fair in 1 case, while the elastic nail group was excellent in 29 cases, good in 2 cases, fair in 0 cases, and there was no significant difference(Z=-0.42, P=0.68). In fenestrated nucleus pulposus extraction for lumbar disc herniation, the two elastic pedicle internal fixation systems are equally effective and can be used. The elastic screw internal fixation system has certain advantages when the distance between the two vertebral bodies is short, and the elastic rod cannot be placed or is difficult to be placed, and it is more widely used.

MRI changes of adjacent segments after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and foraminal endoscopy: A case-control study.

Background:Intervertebral foramen endoscopy has developed rapidly, but compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), the progress of degeneration is unknown. We aim to compare the changes of intervertebral disc and intervertebral foramen in adjacent segments after TLIF and endoscopic discectomy for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).Methods:From 2014 to 2017, 87 patients who were diagnosed with single-level LDH and received surgery of TLIF (group T, n = 43) or endoscopic discectomy (group F, n = 44) were retrospectively analyzed. X-ray, MRI, CT and clinical symptoms were recorded before operation and at the last follow-up (FU). The neurological function was originally evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. Radiological evaluation included the height of intervertebral space (HIS), intervertebral foramen height (FH), intervertebral foramen area (FA), lumbar lordosis (CA) and intervertebral disc degeneration Pfirrmann scores.Results:There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics, JOA improvement rate, reoperation rate and complications between the two groups. The age, average blood loss, average hospital stays and average operation time in group F were lower than those in group T. During the last FU, HIS, CA and FA decreased in both groups, and the changes in group T were more significant than those in group F (P < .05). There was no significant difference in FH changes between the two groups (P > .05).Conclusion:Both TLIF and endoscopic surgery can achieve good results in the treatment of LDH, but the risk of lumbar disc height loss and intervertebral foramina reduction in the adjacent segment after endoscopic surgery is lower.

Characteristics of Sciatic Scoliotic List in Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Retrospective radiological study. Physical examination reveals sciatic scoliotic list (SSL) in some patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). We aimed to evaluate the coronal and sagittal parameters of the SSL curve, describe their characteristics, and establish a new classification system. We retrospectively reviewed 230 patients (SSL group = 96; non-SSL group = 134) diagnosed with single-segment LDH from January 2018 to December 2020. The control group comprised 70 healthy volunteers. Radiographic parameters were compared between the groups. In the SSL group, the Cobb's angle was 12.5 ± 5.3° (4.2-31.2), trunk shift 26.2 ± 17.9mm (.0-88.2mm), and apical vertebral translation 31.7 ± 16.0mm (1.18-8.58mm). Further, 62.5% of patients had L4/5 disc herniation, 76.0% had disc herniation at the convex side of the lumbosacral scoliosis, and 81.3% had disc herniation at the opposite side of the trunk shift. Compared to the control group, lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis decreased, pelvic tilt increased, and the sagittal vertical axis moved forward in the other patients. The sagittal imbalance in the SSL group exacerbated. Using the positional relationship between vertebrae and the central sacral vertical line (CSVL), we identified two main SSL patterns with which 95.8% of the patients were defined as Type 1. The SSL curve is characterized by a long thoracic or thoracolumbar curve, with a relatively straight sagittal profile and little rotation. Further, the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae shifts are on the same side as the CSVL. These features of the SSL curve differentiate it from other types of structural scoliosis.

Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy vs. minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) have been commonly demonstrated as two effective choices for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This meta-analysis aims to compare the effects of PELD and MIS-TLIF for the treatment of single-segment LDH. Randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies published from the time when databases were built to January 2022 that compared the effects of PELD and MIS-TLIF for single-segment LDH were retrieved from a comprehensive search in six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase databases, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and CNKI). All analyses were performed with RevMan 5.4 software. A total of 9 studies with 1274 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the PELD group was associated with lower visual analog scales (VAS) score for back pain at the final follow-up (MD: 1.23; 95% CI: [0.32, 2.14], p=0.008), higher Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score (MD: 2.29; 95% CI: [1.38, 3.19], p<0.00001), lower Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (MD: -2.46; 95% CI: [-4.50, -0.43], p=0.02), shorter operation time at 3 months (MD: -51.77; 95% CI: [-74.63, -28.91], p<0.00001) and lesser hospital stay (MD: -5.18; 95% CI: [-6.65, -3.71], p<0.00001), and less blood loss (MD: -187.13; 95% CI: [-281.45, -92.81], p=0.0001). However, it was associated with a higher rate of recurrent disc herniation (RR: 17.66; 95% CI: [4.25,73.44], p<0.0001). There were no significant differences between PELD and MIS-TLIF in VAS leg pain (MD: 0.12; 95% CI: [-0.24, 0.49], p=0.51), and complication rate (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: [0.45, 1.12], p=0.14). The existing evidence showed that PELD had significantly better outcomes than MIS-TLIF in JOA score at six months, operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay as a procedure for LDH, but it had a higher recurrence rate than MIS-TLIF. Meanwhile, we should have a good command of the pros and cons of the two surgical methods to formulate an appropriate surgical plan for the patients.

Delayed arterial symptomatic epidural hematoma on the 14th day after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A case report

BACKGROUNDDelayed arterial symptomatic epidural hematoma (SEH) on the 14th day after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is rare but it may lead to severe complications if not identified and treated in a timely manner. After diagnosis of the current case, early surgical removal of the hematoma and strict hemostasis treatment was accomplished. This case report highlights the importance of swift diagnosis and treatment in SEH patients.CASE SUMMARYA 41-year-old male patient with a single-segment lumbar disc herniation underwent left-side PLIF. On the 14th post-operative day, the patient complained of lumbar incision pain with sudden onset accompanied by left limb radiation pain and aggravated cauda equina symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging examination and a puncture blood draw at the incision site confirmed a delayed arterial SEH. Emergency surgical removal of the hematoma and hemostasis was performed. About 70 mL of hematoma was found in the left incision. Continuous bleeding was found in the anterior branch of the transverse process of the 4th lumbar artery in the muscle area about 2 cm below the transverse process of the 4th lumbar vertebra. A blood jet of about 10 cm in height was observed and bipolar electrocoagulation was used to stop the bleeding. Post-operative lumbar incision pain and left lower limb pain were relieved immediately and gradually disappeared. There was no recurrence during the 12-mo follow-up.CONCLUSIONFor delayed arterial SEH on the 14th day after PLIF, preventive measures including pre-, intra- and post-operative prevention should be implemented.

A Retrospective Comparative Study of Modified Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy and Open Lumbar Discectomy for Gluteal Pain Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation

IntroductionThis study aimed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of modified percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) in the surgical management of single-segment lumbar disc herniation (LDH) gluteal pain and to determine whether it provides a better clinical outcome than open lumbar discectomy (OD).MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients treated with modified PETD and OD for gluteal pain in LDH from January 2015 to December 2020 was conducted. Sample size was determined using a priori power analysis. Demographic information, surgical outcomes including procedure time (minutes), intraoperative blood loss (mL), hospital days, costs (RMB), fluoroscopy shots, recurrence and complications, etc., were recorded and analyzed. Prognostic outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Japanese Orthopedic Association Score (JOA) and modified MacNab criteria. The preoperative and postoperative VAS, ODI and JOA scores were recorded by two assistants. When the results were inconsistent, the scores were recorded again by the lead professor until all scores were consistently recorded in the data. MRI was used to assess radiological improvement and all patients received follow-ups for at least one year.ResultsThe sample size required for the study was calculated by a priori analysis, and a total of 72 participants were required for the study to achieve 95% statistical test power. A total of 93 patients were included, 47 of whom underwent modified PETD, and 46 of whom underwent OD. In the modified PETD intragroup comparison, VAS scores ranged from 7.14 ± 0.89 preoperatively to 2.00 ± 0.58, 2.68 ± 0.70, 2.55 ± 0.69, 2.23 ± 0.81, and 1.85 ± 0.72 at 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients showed significant pain relief postoperatively (P < 0.01). According to the modified MacNab score, the excellent rate in the PETD group was 89.36%. There was no significant difference compared to the OD group (89.13%, P > 0.05). Complication rates were lower (P > 0.05) but recurrence rates were higher (P > 0.05) in the modified PETD group than in the OD group. The modified PETD group had a faster operative time (P < 0.01), shorter hospital stay (P < 0.01), less intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.01), and less financial burden to the patient (P < 0.01) than the OD group. At 7 days postoperatively, the VAS score for low back pain was higher in the OD group than in the modified PETD group (P < 0.01). The VAS and JOA scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were not significantly different between the modified PETD and OD groups (P > 0.05), and the ODI was significantly different at 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.05).ConclusionModified PETD treatment is safe and effective for gluteal pain due to L4/5 disc herniation and has the advantages of a lower complication rate, faster postoperative recovery, shorter length of stay, fewer anesthesia risks and lower cost of the procedure compared with OD. However, modified PETD has a higher recurrence rate.

Radiologic Analysis of Causes of Early Recurrence After Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy.

Retrospective study. To analyze the causes of and factors influencing early recurrence after TELD performed in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. We included 285 patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation treated using transforaminal endoscopy lumbar discectomy TELD from January 2017 to December 2019 at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China. Patients were classified into early recurrence and non-early recurrence groups based on clinical symptoms and MRI reexamination. Imaging data (eg, disc height index (DHI), Pfirrman grades, base width, postoperative annulus-fibrosus tear size, cross-sectional area of the foramen (CSAF), etc.)were analyzed, and multivariate, binomial logistic regression was utilized to determine which factors were associated with early recurrence after TELD. A total of 285 patients completed surgery and clinical follow-up, during which 19 patients relapsed within 6 months postsurgery, for an early recurrence rate of 6.7%. There were statistically significant differences between DHI, Pfirrman grades, base width, postoperative annulus-fibrosus tear size, herniation sites, CSAF and Modic changes between the early recurrence and non-early recurrence groups (P < .05). On multivariate logistic regression,the degree of disc degeneration (OR = .747, P = .037), CSAF (OR = 5.255, P = .006), degree of Modic change (OR = 1.831, P = .018) and base width of the herniation (OR = 4.942, P = .003) were significantly correlated with early recurrence after TELD. Postoperative annulus-fibrosus tear size, DHI, and location of the disc herniation were associated with early recurrence after TELD. Increased base width of the herniation, severe disc degeneration, decreased CSAF and Modic change were risk factors for early recurrence after TELD.

Short-Term Postoperative Pain and Function of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Single-Segment Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective Spinal surgery is gradually moving toward minimally invasive surgery, but there is still some lack of knowledge about the Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) technique that has been hotly debated in recent years. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify whether UBE is superior to percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for relieving short-term postoperative pain and promoting functional recovery. Methods Computer searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were performed to search for studies on UBE versus PELD for single-segment lumbar disc herniation (ssLDH) from the time of database construction to Mar. 2022, and two investigators independently performed literature screening and data extraction, and evaluation of the quality of the included studies was observed as operation time, complications, and visual analogue scale (VAS) at each preoperative and postoperative stage as well as Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and meta-analysis was performed by applying the Review Manager 5.4 software. Results Meta-analysis showed that PELD had shorter operation time (MD = 35.36, 95% CI (4.67, 66.04), P = 0.02) and had lower VAS of back pain at 3 days postoperatively (MD = 0.62, 95% CI (0.04, 1.19), P = 0.04) compared to the UBE. However, there was no statistical significance between the two groups in terms of complications (MD = 2.53, 95% CI (0.40, 16.11), P = 0.33), VAS of back pain at 30 days postoperatively (MD = 0.05, 95% CI (-0.19, 0.28), P = 0.70), VAS of leg pain at 3 days postoperatively (MD = 0.21, 95% CI (-0.20, 0.61), P = 0.33), VAS of leg pain at 30 days postoperatively (MD = 0.09, 95% CI (-0.29, 0.46), P = 0.65), and ODI at 30 days postoperatively (MD = −0.81, 95% CI (-3.03, 1.41), P = 0.47). Conclusions Current evidence suggests that both UBE and PELD are effective in relieving short-term postoperative pain and promoting functional recovery, and there is no difference in complications between them; UBE requires longer operation time, and PELD may be superior in relieving immediate postoperative pain. This trial is registered with PROSPERO ID: CRD42021287810.

A comparison of long-term efficacy of K-rod-assisted non-fusion operation and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for single-segmental lumbar disc herniation

K-rod-assisted non-fusion surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation has been proven to have short-term clinical efficacy. Meanwhile, its long-term effects have not been examined. To observed the long-term clinical efficacy of K-rod-assisted non-fusion operation, this study retrospectively analyzed 22 patients with lumbar disc (L4/5) herniation who underwent K-rod-assisted non-fusion operation (n = 13) or PLIF (n = 9). They were followed-up for more than 5 years. The operation times and blood loss were significantly reduced in the K-rod group compared to the PLIF group. At the last follow-up, the clinical outcomes of the K-rod group were improved compared to those of the PLIF group as observed by the VAS score, JOABPEQ, and ODI. Imaging outcomes at the last follow-up indicated that the loss of height in the L3/4 and L5/S1 intervertebral space, the ROM of L3/4 and L5/S1, and the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in the PLIF group were significantly higher than those in the K-rod group. According to Pfirrmann grading, Modic changes, and UCLA grading, the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration was 55.6% in the PLIF group and 15.4% in the K-rod group. Changes in spino-pelvic parameters between the two groups were as follows: pelvic index remained unchanged, pelvic tilt angle increased, and lumbar lordosis and sacral slope decreased. Therefore, compared to PLIF, single-segment lumbar disc herniation using K-rod-assisted non-fusion surgery resulted in better long-term clinical efficacy. Our results demonstrate that this procedure can delay adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar surgery.

Single-segment lumbar microdiscectomy:drainage or not

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-segment lumbar microdiscectomy without drainage. The clinical data of 135 patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation treated by microdiscectomy surgery from January 2018 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 95 males and 40 females, aged from 18 to 40 years old, with a mean of (28.3±5.4) years. They were divided into drainage group (78 cases) and non-drainage group (57 cases) according to whether the drainage tube was placed during operation. The general conditions of patients were recorded such as age, gender, operation segment, body mass index(BMI), symptom duration, follow-up time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, out-of-bed time, hospital stay, postoperative drainage removal time and drainage volume of drainage group, postoperative body temperature. VAS of incisional pain in supine resting state on the 1 and 3 days after operation, the VAS of low back pain and lower extremity radiating pain during ground exercise before operation, 3 days, 1 month and 3 months after operation were compared. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was collected before operation, 1 month and 3 months after operation. The ratio of complications was calculated such as symptomatic incision hematoma, poor incision healing, incision infection, exacerbation and progressive aggravation of neurological dysfunction, and unplanned secondary surgery. There were no significant differences in age, gender, operation segment, BMI, symptom duration, follow-up time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative body temperature between two groups. The average hospital stay and out-of-bed time in non-drainage group were shorter than in drainage group(P=0.0000). VAS of incision pain in non-drainage group was lower than that in control group at 1 and 3 days after surgery (P<0.05). Postoperative low back pain VAS and ODI of all patients were significantly reduced compared with those before surgery. No symptomatic hematoma occurred in two groups. Postoperative neurological dysfunction immediately aggravated each one patient in two groups, and no progressive aggravation of neurological function was found in two groups. Incision infection occurred in one case in each of the two groups, and both were cured by drug treatment; poor incision healing occurred in one case in each of the two groups, and both were healed after repeated dressing changes. There was one case of unplanned second operation in drainage group, the patient received a second operation due to disc protrusion recurrence within 1 month. Single-segment lumbar microdiscectomy without drainage can shorten the average hospital stay and promote early exercise out of bed, and reduce the trauma and stress reaction of drainage. No drainage may be an option for patients with enhanced recovery after lumbar microdiscectomy.

Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway reduces the length of hospital stay without additional complications in lumbar disc herniation treated by percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy

BackgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in spine surgery is increasingly popular which can reduce the length of hospital stay (LOS). However, there are few studies on the safety and effectiveness of ERAS pathway in the treatment of single-level lumbar disc herniation (LDH) by percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD). The aim of this study was to investigate whether ERAS can reduce LOS of patients with single segment LDH treated by PETD.MethodsWe reviewed the outcomes of all LDH patients (L4/5) who had been treated with PETD at our institution. Quasi-experimental study was adopted between patients treated in an ERAS after PETD with those rehabilitated on a traditional pathway. The two groups were analyzed for LOS, operation time, complications, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI), hospitalization expenses (HE), and improved MacNab efficacy assessment criteria (MacNab).ResultsA total of 120 single segment LDH patients (ERAS pathway 60 cases, traditional care pathway 60 cases) who were selected from January 2019 to January 2021 met the inclusion criteria. There was a significant difference in mean LOS postoperative VAS scores and ODI on the 3rd day after surgery between the two groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications and HE were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean LOS decreased from 3.47 ± 1.14 days to 5.65 ± 1.39 days after application of ERAS pathway (P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe ERAS pathway reduced LOS without resulting in additional complications after PETD. These findings support the application of the perioperative ERAS pathway in the treatment of single-level LDH with PETD.Level of evidenceLevel IV, therapeutic