Single Positive Culture Research Articles

Unexpected positive cultures in conversion hip and knee arthroplasty.

Total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with previous history of periarticular surgery, such as osteosynthesis, can be surprisingly complex. This type of procedure is known as conversion arthroplasty (cTHA or cTKA) and has a higher risk of complications. The rates of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) and the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to primary arthroplasty is unclear. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of Unexpected Positive Cultures (UPC) in a series of conversion arthroplasty patients. The main questions to answer are: 1. Are the patients with conversion arthroplasties more susceptible to UPC than other causes of revision arthroplasties? 2. Are the conversion patients with UPC more susceptible to developing PJI? This was a retrospective review of patients submitted to cTHA and cTKA from January 2012 to September 2018. Patients with history of previous infection or with missing intraoperative cultures were excluded. The UPC was defined as a single positive culture obtained during a procedure previously considered aseptic and PJI was defined according to the 2018 ICM criteria. After excluding 141 cases, 205 patients were analyzed, 160 hips and 45 knees. Nine (4.4%) UPC were identified, five (3.1%) in the hip group and four (8,9%) in the knee group. Staphylococcal species were the most common isolated bacteria (n = 7, 77.7%). During the study period, four (1,9%) patients were diagnosed with PJI. Only one case had an UPC and a different germ was identified during revision arthroplasty workup. While UPC are more prevalent in conversion knee arthroplasties compared to conversion hip arthroplasties, the rates are similar to those observed in revision arthroplasty for other indications. Importantly, the presence of a UPC in conversion arthroplasty does not appear to elevate the risk of subsequent periprosthetic joint infection, provided a thorough PJI workup has been conducted preoperatively. Therefore, in such cases, UPCs may be safely disregarded.

Can pre-analytical procedures improve microbiological culture yield in patients with periprosthetic infections?

BackgroundThe detection of causative pathogens plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and targeted treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). While there have been improvements in analytic methods in the past, pre-analytical procedures have not yet been sufficiently investigated. The objective of this study was to compare the culture yield of four different pre-analytical procedures.MethodsPatients with perioperative diagnosis of PJI were included in a single center cross-sectional study (2021–2022). Tissue samples (n = 20) of each patient were randomly and equally distributed to each of the four study arms. Tissue samples were either send to the laboratory without culture medium (group A) or were transported in thioglycolate medium immediately after sampling at three different temperatures (room temperature, 4 °C, 37° for 24 h; group B-D). Culture media were investigated for growth on days 1, 3, 7, 12, 14. All organisms, the number of positive samples and the time to positivity were recorded and compared between the study arms. Single positive cultures were considered as contamination.ResultsIn total, 71 patients were included. The proportions of culture negative samples (10–15%) and polymicrobial infections (51–54%) were comparable between the four arms. Seven patients (10%) were culture-negative in group A, but showed growth in thioglycolate media (group B-D). Furthermore, 13% of patients showed growth in all groups, but additional organisms were cultured in thioglycolate. There was growth beyond day 7 of culturing only in thioglycolate, but not in group A. A storage temperature of 4 °C showed a longer time to positivity compared to the other groups (p < 0.001).ConclusionsPre-analytical storage of tissue samples in thioglycolate broth did not improve the culture yield and did not detect additional cases of infection compared to the standard (pre-analytical storage in sterile containers). However, including a thioglycolate medium to the sampling algorithm reduced the rate of culture-negative infections and helped to identify additional organisms.

Unexpected positive cultures in revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Unexpected positive cultures are defined as a single positive culture in intraoperative samples taken during revision surgery after prosthetic joint infection was preoperatively ruled out. This study aims to determine the prevalence of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). As a secondary objective, this study aims to compare the re-intervention rate in this specific group, between UPC and non-UPC patients. The hypothesis is that the UPC prevalence in patients who undergo a revision TKA after UKA is not higher than in other TKA revision cases and this does not increase the risk of re-intervention. This is a retrospective study where all patients who underwent a UKA revision from January 2016 to February 2023 in a high-volume arthroplasty centre, were analyzed. Unexpected positive culture prevalence in this group of patients was obtained. During the included period, 270 UKA revision surgeries were performed. Eight cases had at least two positive cultures and were therefore excluded. The final analysis included 262 patients. Of these, 8 (3.05%) patients presented UPCs and the isolated microorganisms were low-virulence organisms. None of the UPC patients received any treatment. No statistical differences were found between UPC and non-UPC groups in the analyzed variables. The prevalence of unexpected positive cultures in patients following revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is lower than in patients who undergo a revision of total knee arthroplasty. In UKA patients a UPC does not seem to increase the risk of a re-intervention, so it can be safely ignored if ICM criteria are not met.

Difficult-to-treat resistant gram-negative blood stream infections – the beginning of a superbug era – a prospective observational study

IntroductionCarbapenem resistant gram-negative bacterial infections are a growing concern worldwide. However, India is already in the era of a shortage of effective antibiotics for the management of these infections. Moreover, Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR) gram-negative infections, which are not much studied, further complicate the scenario. This study emphasized the incidence and outcomes of DTR infections. MethodologyThis is a single-center prospective observational study. The study included hospitalised patients aged ≥18 years with gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections (GNBSI). Blood cultures with the growth of contaminants and/or single positive culture taken from the femoral site were excluded. Incidences of DTR infections and outcomes in the form of 30-day mortality were analysed. ResultsTwo hundred forty patients with GNBSI episodes were recorded. The Incidence of DTR GNBSI was 37.9% (91/240). Multivariate analysis found that Hospital-acquired infections, ICU admission and mechanical ventilation were independent risk factors for DTR GNBSI. The most common DTR GNB isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae (31/49, 63.3%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (26/52, 50%). The adjusted relative risk of mortality was remarkably high in DTR GNBSI (aRR 3.9; 95% CI 1.9–7.9) as compared to CR+/DTR- GNBSI (aRR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1–1.0) and ESCR/CS GNBSI (aRR 1.1; 95% CI 0.5–2.4). ConclusionDTR GNB infections are growing concern in India and this need to be evaluated in multicentric studies. Moreover, DTR GNBSI was associated with significantly higher mortality and there is need of further empowerment of antibiotic stewardship practices.

The Role of Single Positive Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Total Hip and Knee Revision Surgery-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

(1) Background: Prior to revision hip (THA) or knee arthroplasty (TKA), periprosthetic low-grade infection (PJI) should be ruled out. Despite advances in preoperative diagnosis, unsuspected positive cultures (UPCs) may occur in initially planned aseptic revisions. Particularly, single UPCs pose a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma, as their impact on outcome is unclear and recommendations are heterogeneous. This review investigates the frequency of single UPCs and their impact on implant survivorship. (2) Methods: In July 2022, a comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and Cochrane Library search. In total, 197 articles were screened. Seven retrospective studies with a total of 5821 cases were able to be included in this review. (3) Results: Based on the cases included, UPCs were found in 794/5821 cases (14%). In 530/794 cases (67%), the majority of the UPCs were single positive. The most commonly isolated pathogens were coagulase negative Staphylococci and Cutibacterium acnes. Five of seven studies reported no influence on revision- or infection-free survival following a single positive culture. In two studies, single UPCs following THA revision were correlated with subsequent re-revision for PJI. (4) Conclusions: Single UPCs of a non-virulent pathogen following presumed aseptic TKA revision may be interpreted as contaminants. A single UPC following THA revision may be a risk factor for subsequent PJI. The role of systemic antibiotic treatment remains unclear, but it should be considered if other risk factors for PJI are present.

Proof of concept of a new device for the insertion of peripheral venous catheters in aseptic conditions

According to the recommendations by the World Health Organization, the insertion of a peripheral venous catheter (PVC) must be an aseptic procedure while using non-sterile gloves. To overcome this apparent contradiction we have invented and patented (WO/2021/123482) a new device to be used during PVC insertion. The device permits the PVC placement in the vein while avoiding to directly touch the catheter with the fingertips. A total of 16 PVCs were inserted in the veins of a venipuncture anatomic training model while the operator was wearing non-sterile gloves. The gloves had been previously contaminated by embedding the fingertips in an agar plate inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis. Following insertion, the PVCs were sterilely removed and deposited on a bacterial culture plate. The tip cultures of PVCs that had been inserted with or without the use of the device were compared. Eight out of eight cultures (100.0%) were positive for S. epidermidis when the PVC had been inserted without using the device, whereas only one out of eight (12.5%) was positive when the device had been used. The single positive tip culture in the latter group corresponded to an insertion in which the operator had inadvertently touched the sterile part of the device while manipulating it. In conclusion, an auxiliary novel device allows the aseptic insertion of PVCs while the operator is wearing non-sterile gloves. Regulatory institutions should consider to recommend the insertion of PVCs by means of devices aimed at avoiding the contamination of the catheter.

Unexpected Positive Cultures in Patients Who Have a History of Septic Revision in the Same Joint

BackgroundThe prevalence of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in an aseptic revision surgery of the joint with a prior septic revision in the same joint remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of UPC in that specific group. As secondary outcomes, we explored risk factors for UPC. MethodsThis retrospective study includes patients who had an aseptic revision total hip/knee arthroplasty procedure with a prior septic revision in the same joint. Patients who had less than 3 microbiology samples, without joint aspiration or with aseptic revision surgery performed <3 weeks after a septic revision were excluded. The UPC was defined as a single positive culture in a revision that the surgeon had classified as aseptic according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting. After excluding 47, a total of 92 patients were analyzed, who had a mean age of 70 years (range, 38 to 87). There were 66 (71.7%) hips and 26 (28.3%) knees. The mean time between revisions was 83 months (range, 31 to 212). ResultsWe identified 11 (12%) UPC and in 3 cases there was a concordance of the bacteria compared to the previous septic surgery. There were no differences for UPC between hips/knees (P = .282), diabetes (P = .701), immunosuppression (P = .252), previous 1-stage or 2-stages (P = .316), causes for the aseptic revision (P = .429) and time after the septic revision (P = .773). ConclusionThe prevalence of UPC in this specific group was similar to those reported in the literature for aseptic revisions. More studies are needed to better interpret the results.

Culture-based determinants and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections

The objective of this study was to examine the occurrence, determinants, and outcome of S. aureus bloodstream infections (BSI) diagnosed based on single versus multiple positive initial cultures. All adults with first episodes of mono-microbial S. aureus BSI in Queensland during 2000-2019 were included. 10,855 (67%) and 5,421 (33%) were diagnosed based on one and multiple positive initial cultures, respectively. Patients with multiple positive initial cultures were significantly younger, more likely to have community-associated disease, have a shorter time to culture positivity, less likely to have methicillin-resistant S. aureus BSI, and have a different distribution of comorbid medical illnesses and clinical foci. The 30-day all-cause case-fatality rate was 18% and single positive initial culture was an independent risk factor for death. Among patients with S. aureus BSI, those diagnosed by single positive initial blood cultures have different clinical features and a higher risk for death.

Treatment outcomes of patients with Cutibacterium acnes-positive cultures during total joint replacement revision surgery: a minimum 2-year follow-up

IntroductionPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total joint replacement (TJR). Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) is a low virulent skin commensal, commonly found during TJR revision surgery for “aseptic” causes. The purpose of the present study was to report the treatment outcomes of patients with C. acnes contamination or infection in the presence of a TJR treated with a revision surgery ± implant exchange ± prolonged (≥ 8 weeks) postoperative antibiotics.MethodsMedical records of patients with at least one positive C. acnes culture in intraoperative tissue samples or sonication fluid from a TJR revision surgery between January 2005 and December 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was infection eradication according to Delphi criteria. The diagnostic accuracy of preoperative TJR aspiration regarding the diagnosis of C. acnes PJI was also investigated.ResultsA total of 52 TJR (28 shoulders, 17 hips, 7 knees) in 52 patients (35 males, 17 females) with an average age of 63 ± 11 (33–86) years were included. At an average follow-up of 67 ± 33 (24–127) months, the infection eradication of C. acnes PJI was 97% regardless of the surgical treatment or administration of prolonged postoperative antibiotics. The incidence of unsuspected C. acnes PJI was 28.8%. The sensitivity and specificity of preoperative joint aspiration in detecting C. acnes PJI were 59% and 88%, whereas the PPV and NNV were 83% and 67%, respectively.ConclusionInfection eradication of C. acnes PJI was very high at a minimum follow-up of 24 months, suggesting that C. acnes PJI could be adequately treated with a combination of revision surgery and prolonged postoperative antibiotics. The preoperative diagnosis of C. acnes PJI might be challenging with more than one-quarter of patients presenting without suspicion of C. acnes PJI. The appropriate treatment of patients with a single positive culture remains still unclear. A negative TJR aspiration should not rule out a C. acnes PJI, especially in the presence of clinical correlates of infection.Level of evidenceRetrospective case–control study, Level III.IRB approvalKantonale Ethikkommission Zürich, BASEC Nr.:2017-00567.

Unsuspected Positive Cultures in Planned Aseptic Revision Knee or Hip Arthroplasty-Risk Factors and Impact on Survivorship.

Unsuspected positive cultures (UPCs) may be found at the time of planned aseptic revision surgery and have previously been associated with decreased implant survival. However, reported rates vary greatly, and potential risk factors are widely unknown. This study investigates the rate of UPCs, implant survival, as well as potential risk factors for UPCs and revision. This is a retrospective, single-center study on 434 cases of total hip arthroplasty (THA 277) and knee revision arthroplasty (TKA 157) performed between 2010 and 2017. Microbiology culture results, revision-free survival (RFS) and infection-free (IFS) survival, and the potential impact of UPCs as well as patient- or procedure-related risk factors were investigated at a minimum follow-up of 24 months (median 41 months). A total of 37% of patients had a positive culture (160/434). 27% (119/434) had a solitary positive culture, and 9% (41/434) had ≥2 positive cultures of the same species. Most commonly, coagulase-negative staphylococci were cultured. Overall, 32% (13/41) of patients with ≥2 positive cultures underwent revision for infection compared with 6% (17/274) of patients with negative cultures. RFS and IFS were reduced if ≥2 cultures were positive. Single positive cultures had no impact on RFS or IFS. Male sex, elevated serum C-reactive protein, and obesity were independently associated with finding ≥2 UPCs in revision THA. Appearance of ≥2 UPCs in aseptic revision leads to reduced RFS and IFS. Males, obese patients, and patients with elevated serum C-reactive protein planned for THA revision should be considered for extended diagnostics to rule out periprosthetic joint infection.

Positive Cultures Can Be Safely Ignored in Revision Arthroplasty Patients That Do Not Meet the 2018 International Consensus Meeting Criteria

BackgroundDuring aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA), one or more cultures may occasionally isolate an organism. The hypothesis of this study was that in a portion of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty for aseptic failure, culture may isolate an organism(s) that can be left untreated. MethodsAll patients undergoing revision TJA from 2000 to 2017 at two institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized as aseptic if they were appropriately investigated preoperatively and did not meet the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria. In the aseptic revision cohort, patients with a single positive culture or multiple cultures positive for different organisms (“organism-positive”) and patients who had negative intraoperative cultures (“organism-negative”) were compared based on demographics, comorbidities, operative details, subsequent reoperations, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). ResultsIn total, 3,234 International Consensus Meeting–negative aseptic revision TJAs were included, of which 215 patients (6.6%) were organism-positive, 196 (91.2%) had a single positive culture, and 19 (8.8%) were positive for 2 or more distinct organisms (ie, polymicrobial). The most prevalent organisms were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (37.5%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (9.6%), and Cutibacterium acnes (8.0%). Demographics and operative details were comparable between the groups. Using multiple regressions there was no association between culture positivity and the rate of reoperation or PJI. ConclusionIsolation of organisms by culture in patients undergoing revision for aseptic failure was not uncommon. As long as these patients were appropriately investigated preoperatively and PJI was excluded, these findings suggest that culture results may be ignored without subjecting patients to additional antimicrobial treatment.

Which Minor Criteria is the Most Accurate Predictor for the Diagnosis of Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection in the Asian Population?

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of minor criteria from the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) for the diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in an Asian population. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 76 patients who underwent a revision knee or hip arthroplasty at an academic institution between September 2018 and December 2019. All major and minor 2018 ICM criteria were available for all patients included. Cases with at least 1 major criterion or score ≥6 in minor criteria were considered as infected. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by a receiver operative characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC) for each minor criterion. An AUC value of more than 0.9 was considered outstanding and 0.8-0.9 as excellent. ResultsWhen using 2018 ICM threshold, the diagnostic performance ranked based on AUC was the following: alpha defensin (0.92), positive histology (0.83), leukocyte esterase (0.82), synovial white blood cell (0.81), serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (0.78), synovial polymorphonuclear neutrophils (0.77), serum C-reactive protein (0.74), D-dimer (0.59), single positive culture (0.53), and positive intraoperative purulence (0.51). Alpha defensin was considered as an outstanding test among the 2018 ICM minor criteria. Positive histology, leukocyte esterase, and synovial white blood cell were considered as excellent tests. ConclusionBased on our findings, alpha-defensin has the best diagnostic performance in Asian population among the minor criteria of 2018 ICM.

Reduced Infection Rate After Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Extended Oral Antibiotic Protocol.

The optimal postoperative antibiotic duration has not been determined for aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (R-TKA) where the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is 3%-7.5%. This study compared PJI rates in aseptic R-TKA performed with extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) to published rates. Aseptic R-TKAs consecutively performed between 2013 and 2017 at a tertiary care referral center in the American Midwest were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were administered intravenous antibiotics while hospitalized and discharged on 7-day oral antibiotic prophylaxis. Infection rates and antibiotic-related complications were assessed. Sixty-seven percent of the 176 analysis patients were female, with an average age of 64 years and body mass index of 35 kg/m2. Instability and aseptic loosening comprised 86% of revision diagnoses. Overall, 87.5% of intraoperative cultures were negative, and the remainder were single positive cultures considered contaminants. PJI rates were 0% at 90 days, 1.8% (95% confidence interval 0.4%-5.3%) at 1 year, and 2.2% (95% confidence interval 0.6%-5.7%) at mean follow-up of approximately 3 years (range, 7-65 months). EOAP after aseptic R-TKA resulted in a PJI rate equivalent to primary TKA, representing a 2- to-4-fold decrease compared with published aseptic R-TKA infection rates. Further study on the benefits and costs of EOAP after aseptic R-TKA is encouraged.

Validation of the diagnostic criteria of the consensus definition of fracture-related infection

BackgroundThe recently developed fracture-related infection (FRI) consensus definition, which is based on specific diagnostic criteria, has not been fully validated in clinical studies. We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the criteria of the FRI consensus definition and evaluated the effect of the combination of certain suggestive and confirmatory criteria on the diagnostic performance. MethodsA multicenter, multi-national, retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients were subdivided into an FRI or a control group, according to the treatment they received and the recommendations from a multidisciplinary team (‘intention to treat’). Exclusion criteria were patients with an FRI diagnosed outside the study period, patients younger than 18 years of age, patients with pathological fractures or patients with fractures of the skull, cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine. Minimum follow up for all patients was 18 months. ResultsOverall, 637 patients underwent revision surgery for suspicion of FRI. Of these, 480 patients were diagnosed with FRI, treated accordingly, and included in the FRI group. The other 157 patients were included in the control group. The presence of at least one confirmatory sign was associated with a sensitivity of 97.5%, a specificity of 100% and a high discriminatory value (AUROC 0.99, p < 0.001). The presence of a clinical confirmatory criterion or, if not present, at least one positive culture was associated with the highest diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 98.6%, specificity: 100%, AUROC: 0.99 (p < 0.001)). In the subgroup of patients without clinical confirmatory signs at presentation, specificities of at least 95% were found for the clinical suggestive signs of fever, wound drainage, local warmth and redness. ConclusionsThe presence of at least one confirmatory criterion identifies the vast majority of patients with an FRI and was associated with an excellent diagnostic discriminatory value. Therefore, our study validates the confirmatory criteria of the FRI consensus definition. Infection is highly likely in case of the presence of a single positive culture with a virulent pathogen. When certain clinical suggestive signs (e.g., wound drainage) are observed (individually or in combination and even without a confirmatory criterion), it is more likely than not, that an infection is present.

The Diagnosis of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease by Single Bacterial Isolation Plus Anti-GPL-Core IgA Antibody.

ABSTRACTAlthough serum anti-glycopeptidolipid (GPL)-core IgA antibody is a highly specific test for infection with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), Mycobacterium abscessus, and its subspecies abscessus, subsp. massiliense, and subsp. bolletii (MAB), its use for the definitive diagnosis of MAC pulmonary disease (PD) and MAB-PD are unknown. To clarify the diagnostic accuracy of the anti-GPL-core IgA antibody test among patients with radiologically suspected MAC-PD or MAB-PD who already have a single positive sputum culture test. The first isolations of MAC and MAB from patients with radiologically suspected MAC-PD or MAB-PD at the Osaka Toneyama Medical Center between January 2006 and December 2020 were collected. Patients were enrolled when their serum anti-GPL-core IgA antibody was measured during the 3 months before and after the first isolation. We retrospectively compared the results of anti-GPL-core IgA antibody testing with the final diagnoses based on the current guidelines. We included 976 patients for analysis. The serum anti-GPL-core IgA antibody was positive in 699 patients (71.6%). The positive predictive value of anti-GPL-core IgA antibody for the diagnosis of MAC-PD or MAB-PD was 97.4%. The median time required for the second positive culture after the first isolation was 51 days (interquartile range 12 to 196 days). The positive serum anti-GPL-core IgA antibody test allowed an early and definitive diagnosis of MAC-PD or MAB-PD in those who already had a single positive sputum culture test.IMPORTANCE To satisfy the microbiologic criteria of the current diagnostic guideline for nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (PD), at least two positive sputum cultures of the same species of mycobacteria from sputum are required to avoid the casual isolation of mycobacteria. This study showed that the positivity of a serum anti-glycopeptidolipid (GPL)-core IgA antibody test has an excellent diagnostic ability among patients with radiologically suspected Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC)-PD or Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB)-PD who already had a single positive sputum culture test. The usage of single culture isolation plus anti-GPL-core IgA antibody as another diagnostic criterion has a time, cost, and effort-saving effect. Furthermore, it will facilitate the diagnosis of MAC-PD or MAB-PD in the early stage of disease because serum anti-GPL-core IgA antibody becomes high in these patients. Therefore, we proposed adding single culture isolation plus anti-GPL-core IgA antibody as “combined microbiological and serological criteria” to the diagnostic guidelines for MAC-PD and MAB-PD.

Outcomes of hip arthroplasty with concomitant hardware removal: influence of the type of implant retrieved and impact of positive intraoperative cultures.

The impact of residual internal fixation devices on subsequent procedures about the hip has not been clearly well defined. The objective of the current study is to evaluate the outcome of hip arthroplasty after hardware retrieval as a one-stage replacement, to analyze possible differences related to the type of removed implant, and to assess the impact of unexpected intraoperative cultures during implant retrieval. We present a retrospective study including all those cases undergoing hip arthroplasty with concomitant hardware removal (cannulated screws, intramedullary nail, or dynamic hip screw) from 2005 to 2018. We evaluated demographics, intraoperative cultures, early infection rate, and other complications. A total of 55 cases were included in the study. The median time between the implant surgery and the hip arthroplasty was 113days. The removed devices included 6 cannulated screws, 34 intramedullary nails, and 15 dynamic hip screws. Up to 74.5% of the failed osteosynthesis belonged to intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Dislocation rate was 9.1% (1.8% requiring revision surgery), 25.5% of the cases needed further new surgeries after the hip arthroplasty, and 49.1% died during the follow-up period. Any-cause revision surgery and mortality rates were significantly increased after intramedullary nail removal. Intraoperative cultures were performed in 46 cases, and in 9 (16.4%), there was bacterial contamination: 6 cases (10.9%) presented one single positive culture and 3 (5.5%) presented ≥ 2 positive cultures for the same microorganism. A total of five cases (9.1%) presented early prosthetic joint infection that required debridement. None of these five cases had presented positive cultures at the implant removal. According to our results, hip arthroplasty with concomitant hardware removal is related to a high 5-year mortality rate, mainly when intramedullary nail is retrieved. Whereas a high risk of early prosthetic joint infection is associated, it seems not to be related to the elevated presence of unexpected positive cultures.

Clinical significance of Candida isolation from dystrophic fingernails.

Candida onychomycosis mostly involves fingernails. Yet, in contrast to dermatophytes, Candida isolation from dystrophic fingernails does not prove casualty, as sample contamination and non-pathogenic Candida growth occur. Characterising treatment outcome of Candida-positive dystrophic nails is crucial to avoid unnecessary treatment. To investigate predicators associated with treatment outcome among Candida-positive dystrophic fingernails. A retrospective cohort study was carried out among 108 adults with Candida-positive dystrophic fingernails not cured with adequate systemic anti-fungal course. Diagnosis was based on a single mycological culture. Patients with treatment failure (n=85; 78.7% of the cases) were compared to patients with partial response (mild to almost cure; n=23; 21.3% of the cases) at 9 to 12months following treatment initiation. Treatment failure was significantly associated with primary onycholysis (odds ratio [OR] 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-7.4) and prolonged dystrophy (12.8 vs. 3.7years in average), compared to partial treatment response. Non-responders had lower odds to present with distal lateral subungual onychomycosis, compared to partial responders (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-0.7). Demographic and mycological characteristics, as well as number of nails affected, co-presence of paronychia, and treatment regime were not found to be associated with treatment response. Candida-positive primary onycholysis was shown to be non-responsive to systemic anti-fungal treatment, suggesting that anti-fungal treatment is not indicated. For other clinical scenarios, high proportions of treatment non-response suggest that determining causality of Candida should not be based on a single positive mycological culture.

Do Positive Cultures at Second Stage Re-Implantation Increase the Risk for Reinfection in Two-Stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

BackgroundIntraoperative cultures are important in the diagnosis and targeted treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Positive cultures at reimplantation during a two-stage exchange are discussed as a risk factor for reinfection. The aim of this study is the investigation of the incidence and risk factors for positive cultures during reimplantation. MethodsWe retrospectively identified 204 patients (111 knees, 93 hips) who were treated between 2012 and 2016 for PJI using a two-stage exchange protocol at a median follow-up of 42 months. PJI was diagnosed using the criteria of the musculoskeletal infection society (MSIS) of 2011. All cultural findings from first and second stage surgery were recorded. The primary endpoint was revision for infection. Risk factors for positive cultures and reinfection were analyzed. ResultsDuring reimplantation 25% (51/204) of patients had at least one positive culture, in 19.1% (39/204) only a single culture. Patients with culture-negative infections had a higher risk for positive cultures at reimplantation (HR 2.946 (95% CI 1.247-6.961), P = .014) and patients with infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) (HR 3.547 (95% CI 1.7-7.4), P = .001). Patients with positive cultures during reimplantation had a higher risk for reinfection (HR 2.27 (95% CI 1.181-4.363), P = .014) as well as patients with a single positive culture (HR 2.421 (95% CI 1.139-5.143), P = .021). ConclusionAs positive cultures are common and increase reinfection risk irrespective of their numbers, longer antibiotic therapy following reimplantation can be an option. Single positive cultures in reimplantation surgery should not be considered contamination.

Prevalence and Impact of Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Partial Hip or Knee Revision

BackgroundOur aim is to investigate the impact of unexpected positive cultures on the outcome of partial prosthetic revisions. MethodsData regarding patients who underwent a partial hip or knee revision from 2003 and 2012 with the preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening was retrospectively reviewed. The protocol of revision included at least 3 intraoperative cultures. Failure was defined as the need for re-revision due to aseptic or septic loosening at 5 years. ResultsA total of 99 hip and 46 knee partial revisions were included. All cases had at least 5 years of follow-up. Ninety-seven cases (66.9%) had all cultures negative, 35 (24.1%) a single positive culture and 13 (9.0%) ≥2 positive cultures for the same microorganism. The median time from primary arthroplasty to partial revision was significantly shorter for patients with ≥2 positive cultures (26 months) than in those with all cultures negative (48 months) or with a single positive culture (51 months). Partial revisions performed within the first 5 years of implantation had a higher 5-year re-revision rate. The presence of a single positive culture during the partial exchange was not associated with a higher re-revision rate (2 of 35, 5.7%) than in those with negative cultures (3 of 97, 3.1%). On the contrary, re-revision rate was significantly higher in cases with ≥2 positive cultures (3 of 13, 23.1%) than in those with negative cultures (P = .02). ConclusionPartial revisions performed within the first 5 years from implantation and ≥2 intraoperative positive cultures were associated with a higher re-revision risk at 5 years.

Development and Validation of an Evidence-Based Algorithm for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundThe guidelines for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) introduced by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons served the orthopedic community well. However, they have never been validated and do not account for newer diagnostic modalities. Our aim was to update current guidelines and develop an evidence-based and validated diagnostic algorithm. MethodsThis multi-institutional study examined total joint arthroplasty patients from 3 institutions. Patients fulfilling major criteria for infection as defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society were considered infected (n = 684). Patients undergoing aseptic revision for a noninfective indication and did not show evidence of PJI or undergo reoperation within 2 years served as a noninfected control group (n = 820). The algorithm was validated on a separate cohort of 422 cases. ResultsThe first step in evaluating PJI should include a physical examination, followed by serum C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and D-dimer. If at least one of these tests are elevated, or if high clinical suspicion exists, joint aspiration should be performed, sending the fluid for a white blood cell count, leukocyte esterase, polymorphonuclear percentage, and culture. Alpha defensin did not show added benefit as a routine diagnostic test. In inconclusive cases, intraoperative findings including gross purulence, histology, and next-generation sequencing or a single positive culture can aid in making the diagnosis. The proposed algorithm demonstrated a high sensitivity (96.9%) and specificity (99.5%). ConclusionThis validated, evidence-based algorithm for diagnosing PJI should guide clinicians in the workup of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty and improve clinical practice. It also has the potential to reduce cost.