Single-port Platform Research Articles

11457 Transvaginal Notes Hysterectomy With the Chinese Robotic Single Port Platform - Report of Two Cases

11457 Transvaginal Notes Hysterectomy With the Chinese Robotic Single Port Platform - Report of Two Cases

The impact of single-port robotic surgery: a survey among urology residents and fellows in the United States.

Our aim was to investigate the perception and future expectations of Single-Port (SP) surgery among urology trainees in the United States. A 34-item online survey was distributed to urological residency and fellowship programs across the US, covering demographic profiles, SP training opportunities, perceived educational impact, and future perspectives. Descriptive analysis and multivariable linear regression were used to assess predictors of SP adoption. 201 surveys were completed (28.6% completion rate). Among institutions with an SP platform, about 50% have used it regularly for over 2 years, though often in less than 50% of procedures. While robotic simulators are commonly available, only 17% offer both multi-port and SP simulators, and structured pre-clinical SP training is limited. Approximately 30% of respondents expressed concerns over limited hands-on experience and a steeper learning curve with SP. Around 40% felt that their robotic surgery exposure was negatively impacted by SP's introduction. SP surgery's benefits are seen mostly in the immediate post-operative period and a significant number of respondents foresee a major role for SP in urology. However, proficiency in SP surgery is not seen as crucial for career advancement or job opportunities. Academic job aspirations, SP platform availability, and SP surgery workload are predictors of future SP implementation. Trainees increasingly recognize the clinical benefits of SP procedures but express concerns about the potential negative impact on hands-on experience. Training programs should more systematically integrate SP technology into curricula. There is a correlation between training in high-volume SP centers and future SP adoption.

Current status, evolution, and future perspectives in robotic platform systems for prostate cancer treatment: a narrative review.

Robotic surgery has contributed greatly to the shift from traditional surgery to minimally invasive surgery. Urology is the major field of application of robotic surgery. Several urological procedures, especially radical prostatectomy, benefit from the use of robotic surgery. Non-systematic research of the literature was performed using "Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy" and "Robotic platforms" as keywords to understand the actual situation and the future perspectives of this technology in prostate cancer treatment. The robotic platform landscape is constantly evolving. DaVinci has always been the mainstay in this field, particularly after the advent of the new single port platforms. New platforms are emerging, providing an alternative option to the well-known DaVinci system. Since in literature, few studies compare the use of different robotic platforms, their application in urological procedures is not yet widely used, for both oncological and non-oncological procedures. Furthermore, artificial intelligence begins to play a role in this landscape and could be useful for future developments. So further studies are warranted to give a full comprehension of the whole scenario. This review aims to analyze the current state of the use of robotic platforms in urology, particularly in radical prostatectomy, and to understand the evolution.

Evaluation of the da Vinci single-port system in colorectal cancer surgery: a scoping review.

Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer has gained popularity due to its association with reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery. The Da Vinci Single-Port (SP) System combines single-port laparoscopy with robotic assistance. This scoping review aims to evaluate the safety and short-term postoperative outcomes of utilizing the Da Vinci SP platform in colorectal cancer surgery. A scoping review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Data were collected from PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science Library as of December 22, 2023. Studies were screened and selected based on predefined criteria, focusing on the application of the SP robotic system in colorectal procedures. Data extraction included demographics, surgical details, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. A narrative summary of the results was provided due to the heterogeneity in study designs. From an initial 2312 articles, 22 studies were selected for analysis, encompassing 465 patients undergoing robotic SP colorectal surgeries. Of these, 384 (82.6%) had a cancer diagnosis. The median age was 65years, with approximately 60% being male. The median operative time was 225min, with docking times averaging 12-20min. Conversion to multi-port laparoscopy occurred in 4.2% of cases, with no conversions to open surgery. Mean intraoperative blood loss ranged from 50 to 150ml. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved ranged from 15 to 28. A diverting ileostomy was constructed in 20.3% of patients. Median times to flatus and soft diet were 2.5 and 3days, respectively, with hospital stays ranging from 3 to 11days. Perioperative complications occurred in 15.1% of patients, including wound infections (5.1%), anastomotic leakage (3.7%), and postoperative ileus (2.8%). Negative margin status (R0 resection) was achieved in 95% of cases. The Da Vinci SP robotic platform demonstrates promising safety and effectiveness in colorectal cancer surgery. It achieves high rates of successful oncological resection, adequate lymph node retrieval, and minimal intraoperative blood loss. Postoperative outcomes indicate quicker recovery times and manageable complication rates. However, longer follow-up studies are necessary to fully assess recurrence rates and long-term survival benefits associated with this innovative surgical approach.

A Presacral Fixation Simulation Surgical Training Model for Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) Sacrocolpopexy

ObjectiveThe number of sacrocolpopexies performed with transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is increasing, and presacral fixation is the most dangerous step. Therefore, the training opportunities for trainees to become competent in performing vNOTES sacrocolpopexy are very important. Simulation-based training is ideal for filling this gap. The objective of this video article is to demonstrate a simulation surgical training model in vNOTES presacral fixation. SettingThe Department of Gynecology at a university hospital. ParticipantsA urogynecological surgeon. Interventions(1) Establish presacral model (Fig. 1) and pelvic model (Fig. 2). (2) Establish vNOTES single-port platform. (3) Steps of vNOTES presacral fixation: (a) Identify the sacral promontory and right hypogastric nerve (rHN), and incise the right pelvic peritoneum. (b) Expose and open the presacral fascia to expose the middle sacral vessels and anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL). (c) Complete mesh fixation. (d) Close the pelvic peritoneum. This study is exempt from IRB approval. Model materials and corresponding costs are given in Table 1. ConclusionWe present a presacral fixation simulation model during vNOTES sacrocolpopexy. A piece of rubber tissue is attached to pelvic model to accurately simulate the vagina, thus achieving the establishment of the vNOTES single-port platform. The presacral model displays the anatomic hierarchy of presacral exposure: pelvic peritoneum, presacral fascia, presacral space, as well as the ALL, rHN, ureter, and presacral vessels, which are embedded in these layers. Presacral slope design enables realistic presacral suture and mesh fixation. In case of nerve, blood vessel, or ureteral injury during dissection, this model simulates the manifestation through the leakage of different colored liquids. This new model allows the next generation of urogynecological surgeons to acquire adequate training to make them more prepared to perform their initial vNOTES sacrocolpopexy on a patient, possibly increasing future safety and effectiveness.

Single-Port da Vinci Robot-Assisted Cervical Esophagectomy: How to Do It.

Minimally invasive esophagectomies, including robot-assisted procedures, have demonstrated superiority over traditional open surgery. Despite the prevalence of transhiatal and transthoracic approaches, cervical access is less common in minimally invasive esophageal surgery. Advancements in robotic systems, such as the da Vinci Single Port (SP), enable controlled transcervical extrapleural mediastinoscopic access, potentially reducing pulmonary complications and extending surgical options to patients with comorbidities. The da Vinci SP robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy (SP-RACE) employs an SP and laparoscopic approach, demonstrating feasibility with comparable lymphadenectomy and recurrent nerve palsy rates to transthoracic methods. This technique, performed for the first time in Europe at the University Hospital Mainz, involves a transcervical SP phase that allows for effective mediastinal dissection and esophageal mobilization. Despite technical challenges due to limited space, robotic systems enhance controlled access and eliminate arm collision. The da Vinci SP platform's advantages include improved triangulation, fewer interferences, and better control of instruments in confined spaces. This novel approach shows promise for patients with high esophageal tumors and those unsuitable for transthoracic surgery, warranting further investigation into its clinical utility and reproducibility.

VE18 First completely intracorporeal and extraperitoneal robot-assisted kidney autotransplantation with single port platform

VE18 First completely intracorporeal and extraperitoneal robot-assisted kidney autotransplantation with single port platform

The single port robotic surgical "toolbox": a primer for beginners.

The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the da Vinci Single Port robotic platform, including instruments and tools that can aid in implementing the use of this novel platform. Footage recorded during various Single port robotic urologic procedures and dry labs performed at two US institutions was used as video material. A step-by-step guide illustrating key points on OR set-up, platform, instruments, trocar configurations, intraoperative suctioning, bedside assistance were discussed and highlighted. The Single port surgeon console resembles the Xi console but includes upgraded software. The 6-mm biarticulated instruments incorporate an elbow and a wrist flexible joint. These instruments are deployed through the Access port. Access port kit includes the Access port, and a 25-mm multichannel trocar accommodating an 8-mm flexible scope, and three 6-mm robotic instruments. The 0° endoscope has two sets of articulation: a fixed one, and a distal one, allowing for three movements, selected with a hand command, the "Camera Adjust", the "Camera Control" and the "Relocation." The "Cobra mode," is an extra setting that allows the camera to wing out and move laterally relative to the working instruments. Suction is preferably performed with the Remotely Operated Suction Irrigation system. Herein we provide a detailed guide to the main technical nuances of the Single port platform and a practical overview of the instrumentation that is used during Single port robotic procedures. Knowledge of the toolbox that is used during Single port robotic surgery is key for those approaching for the first time this novel technology.

Reduced-port robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with optimized surgical field deployment: early results of single-site plus-two ports method

BackgroundThe adoption of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is increasing globally. Meanwhile, reduced-port RPD (RPRPD) remains uncommon, requiring robot-specific techniques not possible with laparoscopy. We introduce a unique RPRPD technique optimizing surgical field exposure.MethodsOur RPRPD utilizes a single-site plus-two ports technique, facilitated by a single-port platform through a 5-cm incision. The configuration of robotic arms (arm1, arm2, arm3, and arm4) were strategically designed for optimal procedural efficiency, with the arms2 and arm3, alongside the assistant trocar, mounted on the single-port platform, while the arms1 and arm4 were positioned laterally across the abdomen. Drainage was established via channels created at the arm1 and arm4 insertion sites. A “gooseneck traction” was principally employed with the robotic instrument to prop up the specimen rather than grasp, improving the surgical field’s visibility and access. Clinical outcomes of patients who underwent RPRPD performed between August 2020 and September 2023 by a single surgeon across two centers in Taiwan and Japan were reviewed.ResultsFifty patients underwent RPRPD using the single-site plus-two ports technique. The gooseneck traction technique enabled goodsurgical field deployment and allowed for unrestricted movement of robotic arms with no collisions with the assistant instruments. The median operative time was 351 min (250–488 min), including 271 min (219–422 min) of console time and three minutes (2–10 min) of docking time. The median estimated blood loss was 80 mL (1–872 mL). All RPRPD procedures were successfully performed without the need for conversion to open surgery. Postoperative major morbidity (i.e., Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) was observed in 6 (12%) patients and median postoperative hospital stay was 13 days.ConclusionsThe single-site plus-two ports RPRPD with the gooseneck traction proves to be a safe, feasible option, facilitating surgical field visibility and robotic arm maneuverability.Graphical

Single Port Radical Prostatectomy as a Viable Option for Highly Complex Patients: A Single Center Experience

ObjectiveTo explore the safety and feasibility of the Da Vinci® Single-Port (SP) platform in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (SP-RARP), aiming to provide a viable option for patients with surgical and medical complexities that might otherwise limit their access to common minimally invasive technique. MethodsData from 60 medically and surgically highly complex patients undergoing SP-RARP between December 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed. Variables included patient characteristics, surgical history, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata® 17.0. ResultsFifty-three percent of cases had a hostile abdomen (HA) (≥1 major abdominal surgery), and 47% were medically highly complex (American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥5 and a Body Mass Index ≥30). The extraperitoneal approach was used in 56% of HA cases and 68% of MHC cases. Intraoperative complications occurred in 12%, exclusively with the transperitoneal approach in HA cases. Postoperative complications (Clavien Dindo ≥3) were 6% and 14%, respectively, with no significant difference between approaches. Same-day discharge was possible in 44% of HA cases and 54% of MHC cases, with significant statistical differences favoring the extraperitoneal approach in both groups. ConclusionSP-RARP, particularly the extraperitoneal approach, is a viable option for highly complex and challenging cases, providing acceptable oncological and functional outcomes. Prospective studies are crucial for further validating the safety and feasibility of SP-RARP in this patient population.

Perioperative Complications of Single-Port and Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Comparison Analysis.

Background: Following its introduction in 2018, the Single-Port (SP) robotic platform has been increasingly utilized for various approaches of robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP). Despite the demonstrable benefits in enhancing postoperative outcomes, there has been limited evidence on its perioperative morbidity, especially when compared to the gold-standard multiport (MP). This study sought to compare the perioperative morbidity between SP and MP-RARP. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 911 patients who underwent RARP between January 2015 and May 2023. At our institution, SP-RARP has been performed since October 2018 with Extraperitoneal and Transvesical (TV) techniques. To reduce the risk of selection bias, only MP-RARP cases performed before October 2018 were included. Baseline clinicodemographic and perioperative parameters were collected. Perioperative complications were classified in accordance to the Clavien-Dindo system with postoperative complications and readmission reported within 90 days of surgery. Statistical analysis was performed with R Packages for Statistical Computing with descriptive statistics as presented. Results: Of the 484 SP and 322 MP-RARP cases included in our analysis, one intraoperative complication was reported, which pertained to a small enterotomy during TV SP-RARP. Postoperative complications were identified in 14.5% and 14.6% of SP and MP-RARP cases (p = 0.989), respectively. Major complication represents 4.1% of the SP and 3.4% of MP cohorts. The 90-day rates of hospital readmission following SP and MP-RARP were 5.6% and 4.9%, respectively (p = 0.717). Limitations of this study included the retrospective single surgeon, single institution nature of our series that also included the early learning curve experience associated with the novel SP platform. Conclusion: This comparative study provided evidence highlighting the low rates of perioperative complication and readmission following SP-RARP that were comparable to the Transperitoneal MP approach. The low morbidity associated with SP-RARP supports its wider application as an addition to the contemporary minimally invasive surgical armamentariums for prostate cancer.

Implementation of single-port robotic urologic surgery: experience at a large academic center.

The Single-Port (SP) robotic system is increasingly being implemented in the United States, allowing for several minimally invasive urologic procedures to be performed. The present study aims to describe our single-center experience since the adoption of the SP platform. We retrospectively collected and analyzed consecutive SP cases performed at a major teaching hospital in the Midwest (Rush University Medical Center) from December 2020 to December 2023. Demographic variables were collected. Surgical and pathological outcomes were analyzed in the overall cohort and for each type of procedure. The study timeframe was divided into two periods to assess the evolution of SP technical features over time. In total, 160 procedures were performed, with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) being the most common (49.4%). Overall, 54.4% of the procedures were extraperitoneal, with a significantly higher adoption of this approach in the second half of the study period (30% vs 74.3%, p < 0.001). A "plus one" assistant port was adopted in 38.1% of cases, with a shift towards a "pure" single-port surgery in the most recent procedures (21.1% vs 76.7%, p < 0.001). The median LOS was 33.5h (30-48), with a rate of any grade and CD ≥ 3 postoperative complications of 9.4% and 2.5%, respectively, and a 30-day readmission rate of 1.9%. SP robotic surgery can be safely and effectively implemented for various urologic procedures. With increasing experience, the SP platform allows shifting away from transperitoneal procedures, potentially minimizing postoperative pain, and shortening hospital stay and postoperative recovery.

Single Port Modified Partial Nephrectomy: Novel Simultaneous Access to Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy, Initial Clinical Experience.

Introduction and Objective: Since its Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2018, Intuitive Surgical DaVinci single port (SP) robotic platform has been an effectively used technology for multiple urologic procedures. The purpose of this study is to share our early intraoperative and perioperative outcomes and potential benefits for performing a lower anterior access (LAA) incision for SP robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (SP-RAPN). The LAA incision enables performing a trans- or retroperitoneal (RP) approach through the same incision and eases the transition to a RP approach. Methods: This study is a prospective review of 78 SP-RAPN cases between March 2021 and January 2023 by an experienced robotic surgeon. A single 2-3 cm oblique incision parallel to the external oblique muscle, one-third of the distance between the iliac crest and umbilicus, was used to insert the multichannel port to perform the RAPN. We extracted intra- and perioperative data of these patients to share the outcomes of this approach. Results: SP-RAPN was effectively completed in 78 patients (38 females and 40 males) without conversion to open or laparoscopic techniques. The mean age was 61.2 ± 12.1 years. The mean tumor size was 3.0 ± 1.2 cm, 43 were right-sided masses, and 35 were left sided. The R.E.N.A.L Nephrometry score ranged from (4-11) with an average of 7.0 ± 1.9. Average operating room time was 90.5 ± 24.6 minutes, estimated blood loss was 88.3 ± 134 mL, and length of stay of 1.07 ± 0.7 days. Of the 78 cases, 40 required clamping of the renal artery with average warm ischemia time of 19.4 ± 6.7 minutes in patients who underwent clamping. No complications in all of 78 patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility and reproducibility of SP-RAPN using a LAA incision. This incision provides a standardized approach for surgeons to transition to the RP approach using the SP platform.

Endoscopic Mini- or Less-Open Sublay operation with transversus abdominis muscle release using a single-port platform for incisional hernia: A video vignette

The Endoscopic Mini- or Less-open Sublay operation (EMILOS) is a transhernial repair that allows endoscopic dissection and mesh placement in the retrorectus/retromuscular space, and simultaneous transversus abdominis release (TAR) for larger hernias. The operative summary is as follows. 1 A 7-cm longitudinal skin incision was made immediately above the hernial orifice. 2 The hernial sac was circumferentially dissected to the border of the defect, and the abdomen was opened. 3 The posterior rectus sheath (PRS) was incised approximately 5mm lateral to the medial border of the rectus sheath to enter the retrorectus space. 4 Exploratory laparoscopy was performed, and the peritoneum was closed. 5 A single port platform was attached to the wound, and the abdominal wall was insufflated. The retrorectal space was dissected laterally to the outer edge of the rectus abdominis muscle. The linea alba was incised at least 5cm cranially and caudally from the border of the hernia defect to obtain sufficient mesh overlap. 6 The TAR was added to the left side to facilitate medial advancement of the PRS. (7) The PRS was approximated with continuous suture. A self-gripping mesh was trimmed and implanted in the retrorectus space. The mesh was secured with 3-0 absorbable sutures (8) A closed-suction drain was placed on the mesh, and the wound was trimmed and closed. The postoperative course was uneventful. No recurrence was observed at 6-month follow-up. This technique may be advantageous because it allows minimal skin incision with physiological reconstruction of abdominal wall.

Single Port Robotic Pyeloplasty: early single-center experience.

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a prevalent cause of hydronephrosis, especially in young patients. The treatment paradigm for this condition has shifted from open to minimally invasive pyeloplasty. In the present study we describe our initial single centre experience with single port (SP) robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) via periumbilical incision. With the patient in a 60-degree left flank position, the SP system is docked with the Access port (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, US) placed in a periumbilical 3 cm incision. Robotic instruments are deployed as follows: camera at 12 o'clock, bipolar grasper at 9 o'clock, scissors at 3 o'clock and Cadiere at 6 o'clock. After isolation and identification of the ureter and the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ), the ureter is transected at this level and then spatulated. Anastomosis is carried out by two hemicontinuous running sutures, over a JJ stent. Between 2021 and 2023, a total of 8 SP RAP have been performed at our institution, with a median (interquartile range, IQR) of 23 years (20.5-36.5). Intraoperative outcomes showed a median (IQR) OT of 210.5 minutes (190-240.5) and a median (IQR) estimated blood loss (EBL) of 50 mL (22.5-50). No postoperative complications were encountered, with a median (IQR) length of stay (LOS) of 31 hours (28.5-34). In the present study we evaluated the feasibility and safety of SP RAP. The observed outcomes and potential benefits, combined with the adaptability of the SP platform, hold promising implications for the application of SP system in pyeloplasty treatment.

Endorobotic submucosal dissection of rectal lesions using the single port robot DaVinci-SP: initial experience of the first 10 cases.

Endoluminal surgery is increasingly recognized as a mode of treatment for colorectal neoplasms with the latest robotic single port platform Da Vinci-SP (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale) facilitating submucosal dissection of benign rectal neoplasm. In this study, we present our initial experience with endorobotic submucosal dissection in the management of benign rectal neoplasms using the Da Vinci-SP (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale) between 2020 and 2021. The primary endpoint was the successful completion of submucosal dissection. During the study period, 10 patients underwent endorobotic submucosal dissection for benign rectal neoplasms. The median age of the patients was 68 (range: 59-78) years, and the mean BMI was 29.38 (range: 22.9-38.5). The mean size of the lesion was 42.3 mm (range: 20-65 mm) and was located 7.3 cm (mean) from the anal verge (range: 2-10 cm). The mean operative time was 91.3 minutes (range: 57-137 minutes). All 10 dissections were completed successfully en bloc. There were no intraoperative complications or mortality. All patients were discharged on the same day and commenced on a normal diet. Late bleeding was observed in one patient receiving anticoagulation, and one patient had urinary retention. Pathology revealed two adenocarcinomas, six tubulovillous adenomas, one tubular adenoma, and one sessile serrated adenoma. There was no recurrence in all other patients during the median follow-up of 6 months (range: 4-16 months). Endorobotic submucosal dissection using a single-port robotic platform is safe and feasible for benign rectal mucosal neoplasms. The semiflexible platform offers an alternative to endoscopic submucosal dissection with favourable outcomes.

Totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer with the daVinci® single-port platform.

Totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer with the daVinci® single-port platform.

Retroperitoneal Single-Port Robot-Assisted Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision: Initial Experience and Description of the Technique.

With the introduction of the single-port (SP) robot, surgery that was difficult to attempt is becoming possible. Nephroureterectomy (NUx) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma also seems to be able to attempt a retroperitoneal (RP) approach. to investigate the feasibility of SP robotic RP NUx with bladder cuff excision. we sequentially analyzed 20 patients who underwent SP robot NUx from January 2021 to December 2022. all patients were diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and were operated upon by a single expert using the da Vinci SP platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with retroperitoneal approach. A total of 20 patients underwent SP robotic NUx with bladder cuff excision. The mean age of patients was 69.45 ± 8.68 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.37 ± 3.00 kg/m2. The mean tumor size was 2.42 ± 1.03 cm on a CT scan, with right-sided tumors in eight patients (40%) and left-sided tumors in 12 patients (60%). The median console time was 106 min and 40 s, and the expected blood loss was 122.50 ± 75.18 mL. Final pathology showed that all of the patients were diagnosed as having urothelial carcinoma; one patient was classified as Ta (5.00%), three patients were classified as T1 (15.00%), seven patients were classified as T2 (35.00%), eight patients were classified as T3 (40.00%), and one patient was classified as T4 (5.00%). None of these 20 patients showed any complications based on the Clavien-Dindo scale. SP robotic NUx using a retroperitoneal approach provides feasible perioperative and postoperative outcomes for UTUC.

Application of the single-port robotic platform during radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: feasibility of the single-port robot in the multi-quadrant setting.

Urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC) is a malignancy that accounts for 5-10% of all urothelial carcinomas. Radical surgery is the primary treatment option due to the high rate of invasive stages at the time of diagnosis. Nephroureterectomy (NU) with bladder cuff excision is the current standard of care. While laparoscopic NU has been established since 1991, many centres still perform open surgery due to the complexity of laparoscopic instrumentation and the steep learning curve for excising the bladder cuff. With the increasing adoption of the multi-port (MP) robotic surgery, NU has increasingly been performed using this platform. The use of MP robotic systems for NU has been challenged by the need for patient repositioning and/or redocking of the robot, which can consume valuable operative time. The transition from the daVinci Si to the daVinci Xi system has seen a noticeable reduction in redocking and patient repositioning. However, owing to the multi-quadrant nature of the surgery in question, the use of multiple ports and external instrument clashing are still persistent problems. Moreover, there is a growing interest in utilizing a retroperitoneal approach for robot-assisted NU due to its potential benefits such as improved control of hilar structures, reduction of blood loss, shorter operative time and hospital stay, reduced complications and decreased postoperative discomfort. The application of the daVinci single-port (SP) robotic platform during radical NU for UTUC is feasible and has the potential to improve the current surgical approach. Indeed, the use of a SP platform may solve the problem of patient repositioning and redocking of the robot, improve superficial aesthetic outcome and minimize external instrument clashing. While maintaining an optimal oncological control, the retroperitoneal approach, which has been difficult to replicate and adopt using the MP approach, may become standard practice. However, more studies are needed to confirm the benefit of this approach and ultimately determine the impact of the daVinci SP on the management of UTUC.

Robotic bilateral nephrectomy for large polycystic kidney disease.

This study aims to describe our technique and review our experience with synchronous robotic bilateral nephrectomy for large kidneys in ADPKD with the da Vinci XI and da Vinci Single Port platforms (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). We performed a retrospective review of all robotic bilateral nephrectomy cases from January 2020 to present at a high-volume robotic single centre. Demographic data and perioperative details including preoperative CT scans, indication for nephrectomy and renal function were collected. We also collected post-op course data and final specimen data details. Fourteen cases were included. Patient demographics, indications for surgery and specimen data are outlined in Table 1. The largest kidney removed has a measurement of 32 cm in the largest dimension on preoperative imaging. Median operating time from incision to closure was 299 min (IQR 260, 339). Median estimated blood loss was 75 cc (IQR 50, 187.5). Two patients were transfused intraoperatively. Median pre- and post-operative Hgb was 11.0 and 9.6, respectively. Median length of stay was 3 days (IQR 2, 3.5). There were no intraoperative complications and no open conversions. Post-operative complications included one incisional hematoma and one superficial wound infection. One patient was admitted to the surgical ICU post operatively for ventilatory support. Two patients were readmitted within 30 days of surgery. The robotic approach to bilateral native nephrectomy for ADPKD should be considered when native nephrectomies are indicated. The operative times and outcomes are favourable compared with prior series, and this technique works even for very large kidneys.