Single Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Research Articles

Rare mutation-dominant compound EGFR-positive NSCLC is associated with enriched kinase domain-resided variants of uncertain significance and poor clinical outcomes

BackgroundCompound epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are less responsive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) than single EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the detailed clinical characteristics and prognosis of various compound EGFR mutations remain to be elucidated.MethodsWe retrospectively studied the next-generation sequencing (NGS) data of treatment-naïve tumors from 1025 NSCLC patients with compound EGFR mutations, which were sub-categorized into different combinations of common mutations (19-Del and EGFR exon 21 p.L858R), rare mutations, and variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). Prognosis and drug resistance to first-line TKIs were analyzed in 174 and 95 patients, respectively.ResultsCompound EGFR mutations were enriched with EGFR exon 21 p.L858R and rare mutations, but not 19-Del (P < 0.001). The common + rare and rare + rare subtypes had fewer concurrent mutations in the PI3K pathway (P = 0.032), while the rare + rare and common + VUSs subtypes showed increased association with smoking- and temozolomide-related mutational signatures, respectively (P < 0.001). The rare mutation-dominant subtypes (rare + VUSs and rare + rare) had the worst clinical outcomes to first-line TKIs (P < 0.001), which was further confirmed using an external cohort (P = 0.0066). VUSs in the rare + VUSs subtype selectively reside in the EGFR kinase domain (P < 0.001), implying these tumors might select additional mutations to disrupt the regulation/function of the kinase domain.ConclusionsDifferent subtypes of compound EGFR mutations displayed distinct clinical features and genetic architectures, and rare mutation-dominant compound EGFR mutations were associated with enriched kinase domain-resided VUSs and poor clinical outcomes. Our findings help better understand the oncogenesis of compound EGFR mutations and forecast prognostic outcomes of personalized treatments.

Structure-based classification of EGFR mutations in operable pre-invasive and invasive non-small cell lung cancer: a cross-sectional study.

BackgroundIt has been reported that the structure-based approach for defining functional groups of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations predicts the efficacy of EGFR inhibitors better than the traditional exon-based approach in the advanced stage. However, less is known about this structure-based classification of EGFR mutations in operable early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.MethodsNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with pathological stage I–III or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) who had EGFR mutations identified in next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing were recruited. Both exon-based and structure-based groupings of EGFR mutations were compared between the AIS and stage I–III patients using Fisher’s exact test.ResultsIn total 1,012 patients including 66 AIS and 946 stage I–III patients were analyzed in the study. A total of 1185 EGFR mutations were identified in the 1,012 NSCLC patients, of whom 84.39% harbored a single EGFR mutation and 15.61% harbored complex EGFR mutations. As expected, L858R was more common than 19del in our population (39.33% vs. 35.67%). Interestingly, concurrent L858R and 19del mutations were identified in 9 patients (0.89%), and all these patients were diagnosed with multiple primary lung cancer. A higher percentage of atypical EGFR mutations was identified in the AIS cohort than in the stage I–III NSCLC cohort (33.33% vs. 21.66%, P=0.03). According to the structure-based classification of EGFR mutations, 86.07%, 7.11%, 5.04%, and 1.78% of the EGFR mutations were classified as classical-like, P-loop and α C-helix compressing (PACC), exon 20 insertions (Ex20ins), and T790M-like mutations, respectively. The composition of EGFR mutations was different between patients <65 and ≥65 years (P=0.0267) but similar between patients with AIS and stage I–III NSCLC (P=0.1436). However, a higher percentage of Ex20ins occurred in younger (<65 years) patients, nonsmoking patients, and patients with AIS (6.7% vs. 2.5%, P=0.003; 5.8% vs. 0.8%, P=0.0107; and 10.6% vs. 4.7%, P=0.0423, respectively).ConclusionsThis large cross-sectional study delineated the structure-based classification of EGFR mutations in patients with operable NSCLC. While the traditional exon-based EGFR grouping showed difference between AIS and stage I–III NSCLC cohort, no difference was identified in the structural approach. Which approach had better prediction of targeted therapy efficacy in adjuvant settings warrants further investigation.

Clinical outcomes of gefitinib and erlotinib in patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations: A pooled analysis of 438 patients

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of gefitinib and erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. MethodsRelevant researches were identified by a literature search of the PubMed database. Patients with EGFR mutations other than exon 19 deletion and L858R were eligible for the study. Clinical outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). We categorized all uncommon EGFR mutations as: single uncommon EGFR mutations and compound mutations that containing 2 or more kinds of EGFR mutations. We also assessed outcomes in patients categorized by EGFR-TKIs: (1) gefitinib group; (2) erlotinib group. ResultsA total of 438 patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations were included in this study. The ORR for gefitinib and erlotinib was 43.8 %, with a median PFS (mPFS) of 6.00 months and a median OS (mOS) of 20.50 months. Patients with compound mutations had an ORR of 56.3 % and an mPFS of 8.10 months. Both of them were significantly better than these in patients with single uncommon EGFR mutation, which were 29.3 % and 3.90 months, respectively (odds ratio (ORa): 2.74, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.86–4.05, P < 0.001; hazard ratio (HR): 0.58, 95 % CI: 0.48–0.71, P < 0.001). Moreover, patients with compound mutations containing 19 deletion or L858R had a superior response and survival benefits compared to patients with other compound mutation patterns. In addition, the gefitinib group showed a favorable efficacy advantage (P = 0.003) and PFS benefit (P = 0.021) compared to the erlotinib group. ConclusionsUncommon EGFR mutations exhibit favorable but inconsistent treatment responses and survival outcomes to gefitinib and erlotinib, which are closely related to the mutation pattern, the cooccurring partner mutant genes, and the type of EGFR-TKIs received.

Evaluation of Treatment Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Rare Single EGFR Exon 21 L861Q Mutation: Single Center Experience.

OBJECTIVE:Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations are the second most common oncogenic driver event in non-small cell lung cancer. We aimed to compare the first generation erlotinib treatment with the second generation afatinib treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor exon 21 L861Q mutation.MATERIAL AND Methods:Progression-free survival and overall survival of 30 non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib or afatinib due to single epidermal growth factor receptor L861Q positivity were compared retrospectively. The number of patients included in the first, second, and third treatment line was 15 (50.0%), 11 (36.7%), and 4 (13.3%), respectively.Results:There were 23 patients in the erlotinib arm and 7 patients in the afatinib arm. Median progression-free survival was 12.8 months in the erlotinib group and 9.3 months in the afatinib group. Median overall survival in erlotinib and afatinib groups was 77.9 months and 30.3 months, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found in the comparison of these survival times. Conclusion:Survival times of erlotinib and afatinib treatment are similar in patients with a single epidermal growth factor receptor L861Q mutation. In patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment, the female gender has a positive effect on progression-free survival, and being a non-smoker has a positive effect on overall survival. In patients with rare mutation exon 21 L861Q positivity, both first-generation and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be considered.

Audit of Molecular Mechanisms of Primary and Secondary Resistance to Various Generations of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Known Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Centre

AimsPresently, three generations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are approved against oncogene addicted EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with actionable EGFR mutations invariably develop resistance. This resistance can be intrinsic (primary) or acquired (secondary). Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective study carried out between January 2016 and April 2021 analysing 486 samples of NSCLC for primary and secondary resistance to first- (erlotinib, gefitinb), second- (afatinib) and/or third-generation (osimertinib) TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLCs by next generation sequencing (NGS). Tissue NGS was carried out using the Thermofischer Ion Torrent™ Oncomine™ Focus 52 gene assay; liquid biopsy NGS was carried out using the Oncomine Lung Cell-Free Total Nucleic Acid assay. All cases were previously tested for a single EGFR gene with the Therascreen® EGFR RGQ PCR kit. ResultsThe results were divided into four groups: (i) group 1: primary resistance to first- and/or second-generation TKIs. This group, with 21 cases, showed EGFR exon 20 insertions, dual, complex mutations and variant of unknown significance, de novo MET gene amplification besides other mutations. (ii) Group 2: primary resistance to third-generation TKIs. This group showed two cases, with one showing dual EGFR mutation (L858R and E709A) and EGFR gene amplification. (iii) Group 3: secondary resistance to first- and second-generation TKIs. This group had 27 cases, which were previously reported negative for EGFR T790M by single gene testing. Significant findings were MET gene amplification in four cases, with one also showing MET exon 14 skipping mutation. Three cases showed small cell change and one showed loss of primary mutation. (iv) Group 4: secondary resistance to third-generation TKIs. The latter group was further subgrouped into group 4A: secondary resistance to osimertinib (third-generation TKI) when offered as second-line therapy after first- and second-generation TKIs on detection of T790M mutation. This group had 15 cases. EGFR T790M mutation was lost in 10 (10/15; 67%) cases and was retained in five cases. Patients with T790M loss experienced early resistance (6.9 months versus 12.6 months mean, P = 0.0024) compared with cases that retained T790M. Two cases gained MET amplification as the resistance mechanisms. Other mutations that were found when EGFR T790M was lost were in FGFR3, KRAS, PIK3CA, CTNNB1, BRAF genes. One case had EML4-ALK translocation. Two cases showed driver EGFR deletion 19, retained T790M and C797S mutation in Cis form. Group 4B: secondary resistance to osimertinib (when given as first-line therapy) in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. This group had three cases. The duration of osimertinib treatment ranged from 11 to 17 months. Two patients showed additional C797S mutation along with primary EGFR mutation. ConclusionThis study shows the wide spectrum of primary and secondary EGFR resistance mechanisms to first, second and third generation of TKIs and helps us to identify newer therapeutic targets that could carry forward the initial advantage offered by EGFR TKIs.

Abstract 3346: BBT-207, a novel, 4th generation, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with broad-spectrum activity to both treatment-emergent and drug-naïve mutants for the treatment of NSCLC

Abstract Background: Activating mutations in EGFR, e.g., L858R (L) and Del19 (D), are observed in 14.1-32.3% of NSCLC worldwide and defines a druggable entity. Single agent EGFR TKI treatment was established in clinical trials. However, a treatment-emergent mutation of T790M (T) was identified as a major source of drug resistance. Irreversible 2nd and 3rd generation EGFR TKIs were shown effective. Mutant-specific inhibition by 3rd generation EGFR TKIs reduced adverse events such as skin toxicities. The emergence of a missense mutation at C797 (C), to which irreversible TKIs covalently bind, limited their efficacy. Patients harboring treatment-emergent C mutations are left with few therapeutic options. Despite anecdotal reports of efficacy from 1st generation TKIs, these complex molecular variants involving C797 are an increasing clinical concern. To prevent the emergence of drug-resistant subclones, a broad-spectrum EGFR TKI against both treatment-emergent and drug-naïve mutants is required. Such a 4th generation EGFR TKI must also enable monotherapy, allowing precise dose adjustment in case of toxicity. Method: Derived from BBT-176 which is under clinical evaluation (NCT04820023), we synthesized BBT-207 and other related molecules. Using Promega ADP-Glo™ kinase assay, we tested compounds against wild-type (WT) and mutated EGFR proteins. Ba/F3 cells harboring WT and mutated EGFR genes were created and cell viability was measured by CellTiter-Glo® and SpectraMax iD3®. In vivo anti-tumor activity was evaluated in Ba/F3 cell-derived xenograft models and an Osimertinib-resistant patient-derived xenograft model. Single dose pharmacokinetic (PK) study was performed in animals. Results: BBT-207 showed IC50 values &amp;lt; 10 nM against EGFR triple mutants (DTC and LTC) and comparable IC50 values against double mutants (DC and LC), while Osimertinib was ineffective in both groups. BBT-207 was also as active as Gefitinib to single mutants (D and L). Double mutants containing T790M (DT and LT) were inhibited effectively by BBT-207 and Osimertinib at similar concentrations, while not by Gefitinib. In in vivo models to which Osimertinib was inactive (LC and DTC), significant tumor growth inhibition was observed from BBT-207 alone, which was enhanced by the addition of Osimertinib. PK studies in mouse, rat, dog and monkey were consistent with high exposure and sustained drug concentrations above the IC50 values, with evidence of penetration into the central nervous system. Conclusion: BBT-207 is a reversible, mutant-specific, broad-spectrum TKI, active to clinically observed mutations of EGFR and is expected to be compatible with monotherapy of QD schedule in humans. BBT-207 is well-positioned to augment the treatment of EGFR mutated NSCLC, either for acquired drug resistance or in earlier line. Citation Format: Taiguang Jimmy Jin, Sang-Uk Kang, Chulwon Kim, Jehrod Brenneman, Mihee Song, Pavel Printsev, Bo-Bae Seo, Yong-Hee Lee, Sang-Yoon Lee. BBT-207, a novel, 4th generation, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with broad-spectrum activity to both treatment-emergent and drug-naïve mutants for the treatment of NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3346.

Abstract 5461: H002: A wide spectrum, highly selective fourth-generation EGFR inhibitor overcoming resistance harboring C797S mutation in NSCLC

Abstract BACKGROUND: Resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is a major challenge in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. EGFR activating mutations, such as exon 19 deletions (Del19) and L858R substitution, have been reported in 10-50% of patients with NSCLC. Although these patients respond well to early generations of TKIs, acquired resistance by mechanisms such as T790M mutation compromises their efficacy. Recently, the C797S mutation in combination with Del19 or L858R, and with T790M, has emerged as one of the most common mechanisms underlying on-target resistance to a third generation EGFR TKI, osimertinib. We are developing a fourth-generation EGFR inhibitor, H002, with a wide spectrum and high selectivity to address the growing unmet needs in NSCLC patients harboring C797S mutation. METHODS: H002’s selectivity was assessed by KINOMEscan against more than 400 human kinases. A panel of 44 kinases was further evaluated to enable early identification of off-target effect. In vitro and in vivo anti-tumor efficacy was determined in drug-resistant mutant cell lines, CDX and PDX models. Single mutants (Del or L858R), double mutants (Del/T790M or L858R/T790M) and triple mutants (Del/T790M/C797S or L858R/T790M/C797S) as well as wild type EGFR were assessed. Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic (DMPK) properties were further assessed. H002’s safety profile was evaluated in rats and beagle dogs, and by hERG potassium channel assay. Acute toxicity, and repeated dose GLP toxicity studies were also conducted in IND-enabling studies. RESULTS: High kinase selectivity and very low off-target effects were demonstrated by kinome-wide profiling and safety screening. H002 was highly active against all forementioned single, double or triple EGFR mutants (IC50 &amp;lt; 5 nM), and highly selective against wild type EGFR. H002 also exhibited potent anti-tumor effects in a dose-dependent manner in various CDX and PDX models. Excellent PK properties were observed in rats and beagle dogs with bioavailability over 70%. H002 was shown to cross the blood-brain barrier post i.g. administration in rats. No adverse effects of respiratory, cardiovascular and central nervous system were observed in safety studies. Repeated-dose toxicity studies only showed EGFR-related adverse reactions, such as gastrointestinal and liver toxicity, with high safety margin over 10-folds. CONCLUSION: H002 has been demonstrated as a promising next generation EGFR inhibitor, with high selectivity, a wide spectrum and potent anti-tumor activity against various EGFR activating mutations, favorable DMPK and safety profiles. It will be further developed as a fourth-generation EGFR inhibitor to overcome drug resistance in NSCLC. Citation Format: Wei Huang, Lin Zhu, Xiaoe Yan, Xin Huang, Jia Hao, Shan Li, Xiangyu Li, Zhiming Chen, Yunchuan Jia, Haibo Li, Jianming Zhang, Xianming Deng, Caihong Yun. H002: A wide spectrum, highly selective fourth-generation EGFR inhibitor overcoming resistance harboring C797S mutation in NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5461.

EGFR R521K Polymorphism Is Not a Major Determinant of Clinical Cetuximab Resistance in Head and Neck Cancer.

Simple SummaryMalignant Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas occur frequently, and several treatment regimens are used to fight disease progression. While anti-Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab is applied successfully in many cases, therapy resistance occurs after a short period in numerous patients. We checked the hypothesis whether EGFRvIII or EGFR R521K variants can be responsible for antibody efficacy or therapy resistance. EGFRvIII, unlike stated before, was found extremely rarely (<1%), while EGFR R521K was present in over 40% of the patients and suggested to be important in the preclinical models, but not in the clinical cohort. Conclusively, our results suggest that neither EGFRvIII nor EGFR R521K variants are directly resulting cetuximab resistance in Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are among the most abundant malignancies worldwide. Patients with recurrent/metastatic disease undergo combination chemotherapy containing cetuximab, the monoclonal antibody used against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Cetuximab augments the effect of chemotherapy; however, a significant number of patients show therapy resistance. The mechanism of resistance is yet to be unveiled, although extracellular alterations of the receptor have been reported, and their role in cetuximab failure has been proposed. Aims: Here, we investigate possible effects of the multi-exon deletion variant (EGFRvIII), and the single nucleotide polymorphism EGFR R521K on cetuximab efficacy. Results: Our results show that in HNSCC patients, the EGFRvIII allele frequency is under 1%; therefore, it cannot lead to common resistance. EGFR R521K, present in 42% of the patients, is investigated in vitro in four HNSCC cell lines (two wild-type and two heterozygous for EGFR R521K). While no direct effect is found to be related to the EGFR status, cells harboring R521K show a reduced sensitivity in ADCC experiments and in vivo xenograft experiments. However, this preclinical difference is not reflected in the progression-free or overall survival of HNSCC patients. Furthermore, NK cell and macrophage presence in tumors is not related to EGFR R521K. Discussion: Our results suggest that EGFR R521K, unlike reported previously, is unable to cause cetuximab resistance in HNSCC patients; therefore, its screening before therapy selection is not justifiable.

Clinical outcomes of lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

This study aimed to explore the efficacy of different epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in lung adenocarcinoma (AC) patients harboring uncommon EGFR mutations. Between January 1st, 2013 and October 1st, 2019, 2,680 EGFR mutation-positive patients with confirmed stage IIIB/IV lung AC were enrolled from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. Uncommon EGFR mutations were detected in 132 patients using next-generation-sequencing. Clinicopathological features between patients with uncommon EGFR mutations and common EGFR mutations were evaluated by the chi-square test. The clinical outcomes of patients with uncommon EGFR mutations were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Of 132 AC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations, 115 received EGFR-TKIs. Second-generation EGFR-TKIs were associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.116) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.005) than first or third-generation EGFR-TKIs. We also found that patients with compound mutations and double uncommon EGFR mutations had longer PFS (P=0.725) and OS (P=0.741) than those with single uncommon EGFR mutation, although the difference was not significant. In addition, third-generation EGFR-TKIs were more effective than the other two agents in patients with primary T790M mutation regarding PFS (P=0.150) and OS (P=0.033), although the difference in PFS was not significant. Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations treated with second-generation EGFR-TKIs showed better PFS and OS. EGFR-TKIs were more effective in patients with compound mutations or double uncommon mutations.

Redundant roles of EGFR ligands in the ERK activation waves during collective cell migration.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a pivotal role in collective cell migration by mediating cell-to-cell propagation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation. Here, we aimed to determine which EGFR ligands mediate the ERK activation waves. We found that epidermal growth factor (EGF)-deficient cells exhibited lower basal ERK activity than the cells deficient in heparin-binding EGF (HBEGF), transforming growth factor alpha (TGFα) or epiregulin (EREG), but all cell lines deficient in a single EGFR ligand retained the ERK activation waves. Surprisingly, ERK activation waves were markedly suppressed, albeit incompletely, only when all four EGFR ligands were knocked out. Re-expression of the EGFR ligands revealed that all but HBEGF could restore the ERK activation waves. Aiming at complete elimination of the ERK activation waves, we further attempted to knockout NRG1, a ligand for ErbB3 and ErbB4, and found that NRG1-deficiency induced growth arrest in the absence of all four EGFR ligand genes. Collectively, these results showed that EGFR ligands exhibit remarkable redundancy in the propagation of ERK activation waves during collective cell migration.

Driver gene alterations profiling of Chinese non-small cell lung cancer and the effects of co-occurring alterations on immunotherapy.

BackgroundMolecular testing for alterations in oncogenic driver genes and targeted therapies have become standard procedures for non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, little evidence has shed light on the pattern of co‐existence of driver genes in NSCLC, and whether they may have different tumor features affecting immunotherapy is still unclarified.MethodsGenomic alterations in 14 lung cancer‐related genes were conducted in 3440 Chinese NSCLC patients using next‐generation sequencing. Meanwhile, tumor mutational burden and immunotherapy dataset from the Memorial sloan kettering cancer center (MSKCC) and lung adenocarcinoma dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were utilized for analyzing the impact of the co‐occurring alterations on patients’ survival following immunotherapy.ResultsIn this cohort, 90.17% of patients had at least one somatic alteration in the 14 genes, including 51% of co‐occurring alterations. TP53 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were the most prevalent genes (54.74% and 53.55%, respectively), followed by KRAS, ERBB2, ALK, PIK3CA, ROS1, RET, MET, BRAF, KIT, FGFR1, PDGFRA, and NRAS. The prevalence of TP53, EGFR, and ERBB2 in our cohort were significantly higher than that from the TCGA database, whereas KRAS, BRAF, and PDGFRA were significantly lower than the latter. Furthermore, the patients who harbored multiple alterations (8.86%, 31/350) in eight driver genes survived longer and have a higher tumor mutation burden compared to the patients with a single alteration. Similar result was found between the patients with co‐occurring alteration of EGFR and other driver genes and the patients with single EGFR alteration. Meanwhile, we found a distinct immune cell infiltration feature between patients with single and multiple driver gene alterations, as well as between patients with only EGFR alteration and co‐occurring groups.ConclusionThis study identified a unique driver gene feature and found patients harboring co‐occurring alterations of EGFR and other driver genes may benefit from immunotherapy, which may provide more therapeutic selections for EGFR‐mutated NSCLC patients and merit additional investigation.

Uncommon single and compound EGFR mutations: clinical outcomes of a heterogeneous subgroup of NSCLC

Molecular characterization of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is essential to define the correct therapeutic algorithm in metastatic disease. Approximately 90% of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are usually associated with sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The remaining 10% defines a small, extremely heterogeneous subgroup of mutations, with a varied profile of sensitivity and response to target therapies.This retrospective observational study includes 47 patients affected by metastatic NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations (single or compound mutation). Patients were treated with EGFR-targeting TKIs or platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment.Median OS resulted longer in the compound mutation group when compared to single rare mutations (33.6 vs 12 months; P = 0.473); a similar result was observed for PFS (16 vs 7.6 months; P = 0.281), although statistical significance was not reached. ORR, PFS and OS resulted similar for patients treated with first-line EGFR TKIs or chemotherapy. No difference in terms of PFS and OS was found according to the TKI administered.Compound mutations seem to be a good prognostic indicator for OS; they are also predictive of response to 1st and 2nd generation EGFR TKIs, as well as exon 19 insertions and mutations in codon 719 of exon 18. For mutations in exon 18 (not in codon 719) and exon 20 insertions, chemotherapy seems the most effective available option. The addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy could change this approach in the next future.

Coregulation of pathways in lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation: therapeutic opportunities.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in lung adenocarcinoma are a frequent class of driver mutations. Single EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) provides substantial clinical benefit, but almost nil radiographic complete responses. Patients invariably progress, although survival can reach several years with post-treatment therapies, including EGFR TKIs, chemotherapy or other procedures. Endeavours have been clinically oriented to manage the acquisition of EGFR TKI-resistant mutations; however, basic principles on cancer evolution have not been considered in clinical trials. For years, evidence has displayed rapidly adaptive mechanisms of resistance to selective monotherapy, posing several dilemmas for the practitioner. Strict adherence to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) guidelines is not always practical for addressing the clinical progression that EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients suffer. The purpose of this review is to highlight regulatory mechanisms and signalling pathways that cause therapy-induced resistance to EGFR TKIs. It suggests combinatorial therapies that target EGFR, as well as potential mechanisms underlying EGFR-mutant NSCLC, alerting the reader to clinical opportunities that may lead to a deeper and more durable response. Molecular reprogramming contributes to EGFR TKI resistance, and the compiled information is relevant in understanding the development of new combined targeted strategies in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

A bispecific decoy receptor VEGFR-EGFR/Fc binding EGF-like ligands and VEGF shows potent antitumor efficacy

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) represent two clinically validated targets for a variety of human cancers, and dual inhibition of EGFR and VEGF(R) has demonstrated superior activity to single EGFR inhibitors. This study was to construct a novel bispecific decoy receptor VEGFR-EGFR/Fc that contains Fc portion of human IgG1 acted as molecular scaffold, and the immunoglobulin-like domain 1–3 of VEGFR1 and extracellular domain of EGFR fused to the N-terminal and C-terminal of Fc, respectively, aiming at capturing the EGF-like ligands and VEGF. ELISA showed that VEGFR-EGFR/Fc bound to EGF, TGF-α and VEGF with high affinity. It displayed potent proliferation inhibitory effects on human non-small-cell lung cancer A549 cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells revealed by MTT assays. VEGFR-EGFR/Fc significantly inhibited cell invasion and migration demonstrated by wound healing assay and transwell assay. In vivo, VEGFR-EGFR/Fc showed remarkable growth inhibition on A549 xenografts. Cell apoptosis and inhibition of angiogenesis were also observed in xenograft tumour tissues. Mechanistically, VEGFR-EGFR/Fc pre-treatment blocked the phosphorylation of EGFR and VEGFR2 and resulted in a decrease in the downstream signalling molecules, AKT, p44/42MAPK and p38MAPK. These data suggest VEGFR-EGFR/Fc would be a promising candidate for cancer targeted therapy.

Generation and Characterization of a New Preclinical Mouse Model of EGFR-Driven Lung Cancer with MET-Induced Osimertinib Resistance.

Simple SummaryThe use of targeted therapy has changed the clinical management of lung cancer patients, increasing both their life quality and expectancy. Conversely, the appearance of resistance occurs in almost all patients receiving this therapy. In this regard, new strategies combining different therapies could delay or even eliminate the appearance of resistance. However, in order to develop new therapeutic treatments, we need preclinical mouse models that recapitulate human disease. In the present study, we developed a new state-of-the-art mouse model that summarizes all features occurring in EGFR-mutated patients that relapse after osimertinib after acquisition of MET amplification.Despite the introduction of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to treat advanced lung cancer harboring EGFR-activating mutations, the prognosis remains unfavorable because of intrinsic and/or acquired resistance. We generated a new state-of-the-art mouse strain harboring the human EGFRT790M/L858R oncogene and MET overexpression (EGFR/MET strain) that mimics the MET amplification occurring in one out of five patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer that relapsed after treatment with osimertinib, a third-generation anti-EGFR TKI. We found that survival was reduced in EGFR/MET mice compared with mice harboring only EGFRT790M/L858R (EGFR strain). Moreover, EGFR/MET-driven lung tumors were resistant to osimertinib, recapitulating the phenotype observed in patients. Conversely, as also observed in patients, the crizotinib (anti-MET TKI) and osimertinib combination improved survival and reduced tumor burden in EGFR/MET mice, further validating the model’s value for preclinical studies. We also found that in EGFR/MET mice, MET overexpression negatively regulated EGFR activity through MIG6 induction, a compensatory mechanism that allows the coexistence of the two onco-genic events. Our data suggest that single EGFR or MET inhibition might not be a good therapeutic option for EGFR-mutated lung cancer with MET amplification, and that inhibition of both pathways should be the best clinical choice in these patients.

Mutation Spectrum of EGFR From 21,324 Chinese Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Successfully Tested by Multiple Methods in a CAP-Accredited Laboratory.

Genotyping epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) is essential for identifying those patients who may benefit from targeted therapies. Systemically evaluating EGFR mutation detection rates of different methods currently used in clinical setting will provide valuable information to clinicians and laboratory scientists who take care of NSCLC patients. This study retrospectively reviewed the EGFR data obtained in our laboratory in last 10 years. A total of 21,324 NSCLC cases successfully underwent EGFR genotyping for clinical therapeutic purpose, including 5,244 cases tested by Sanger sequencing, 13,329 cases tested by real-time PCR, and 2,751 tested by next-generation sequencing (NGS). The average EGFR mutation rate was 45.1%, with 40.3% identified by Sanger sequencing, 46.5% by real-time PCR and 47.5% by NGS. Of these cases with EGFR mutations identified, 93.3% of them harbored a single EGFR mutation (92.1% with 19del or L858R, and 7.9% with uncommon mutations) and 6.7% harbored complex EGFR mutations. Of the 72 distinct EGFR variants identified in this study, 15 of them (single or complex EGFR mutations) were newly identified in NSCLC. For these cases with EGFR mutations tested by NGS, 65.3% of them also carried tumor-related variants in some non-EGFR genes and about one third of them were considered candidates of targeted drugs. NGS method showed advantages over Sanger sequencing and real-time PCR not only by providing the highest mutation detection rate of EGFR but also by identifying actionable non-EGFR mutations with targeted drugs in clinical setting.

Simultaneous Single Cell Gene Expression and EGFR Mutation Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells Reveals Distinct Phenotypes in NSCLC.

While cancer cell populations are known to be highly heterogeneous within a tumor, the current gold standard of tumor profiling is through a tumor biopsy. These biopsies are invasive and prone to missing these clones due to spatial heterogeneity, and this bulk analysis approach can miss information from rare subpopulations. To noninvasively investigate tumor cell heterogeneity, a streamlined workflow is developed to scrutinize rare cells, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), for simultaneous analysis of mutations and gene expression profiles at the single cell level. This powerful workflow overcomes low-input limitations of single cell analysis techniques. The utility of this multiplexed workflow to unravel inter- and intra-patient heterogeneity is demonstrated using non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) CTCs (n = 58) from six epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant positive NSCLC patients. CTCs are isolated using a high-throughput microfluidic technology, the Labyrinth, and their EGFR mutation status and gene expression profiles are characterized.

Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations in addition to complex mutations treated with osimertinib have a poor clinical outcome: A real-world data analysis.

The present study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with osimertinib, and focused on the resistance mechanism to osimertinib in a real-world setting. Data from 128 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with osimertinib between March 2015 and November 2018 at the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (Beijing, China) were retrospectively collected, and the associations between mutation types and survival were analysed. In patients treated with osimertinib, the objective response rate reached 60.9% (78/128) and the disease control rate reached 81.3% (104/128), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) time of 12.2 months. A number of complex mutations were identified in the re-analysis after the development of osimertinib resistance, including TP53, KRAS and PIK3CA mutations, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and MYC amplifications, and mutations associated with SCLC transformation, demonstrating that these mutations may account for osimertinib resistance. The median PFS time for patients with the EGFR T790M mutation (n=41) was significantly longer than that for patients with the T790M mutation and the aforementioned complex mutations (n=13) (16.7 vs. 10.8 months; P=0.001). Patients with a single EGFR mutation (n=87) had a longer median PFS time than those with an EGFR mutation and complex mutations (n=24) (14.63 vs. 6.63 months; P<0.0001). In conclusion, the present study analysed the effects of osimertinib in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations, particularly T790M mutations. The results indicated that the efficacy of osimertinib was weakened when patients had complex mutations, suggesting that complex mutations may be responsible for resistance to osimertinib.

Mutation spectrum of EGFR in 21,324 patients with non-small cell lung cancer successfully tested by multiple platforms in a CAP-accredited laboratory.

e13637 Background: Genotyping epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) gene in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) is essential to identify those patients who may benefit from targeted treatments. However, the testing methodology is still a puzzle for many clinicians. This study retrospectively reviewed the EGFR data from testing patients with NSCLC in our laboratory in 10 years. Methods: A total of 21,324 NSCLC cases successfully underwent EGFR genotyping in our laboratory for clinical therapeutic purpose, including 5,244 cases tested by Sanger sequencing, 13,329 cases tested by real-time PCR, and 2,751 tested by next generation sequencing-NGS. Results: 54.6%, 20% and 2.3% samples were recorded with tumor cell content (TCC) of &lt; 40%, &lt; 20% and 1% respectively. The average EGFR mutation rate was 45.1%, with 40.3% identified by Sanger sequencing, 46.5% by real-time PCR and 47.5% by NGS. Comparable EGFR mutation rates were observed in cases with 1%-20% TCC from real-time PCR and NGS platforms. In these cases with EGFR mutations, 93.3% of them carried a single EGFR mutation (92.1% with a classical mutation as 19del or L858R, and 7.9% with an uncommon mutation) and 6.7% harbored complex EGFR mutations. 65.3% of the cases carrying EGFR mutations identified by NGS also have tumor related variants in other genes. 26.5% more cases were found to have oncogenic driver mutations with therapeutic significance beyond EGFR by NGS. Conclusions: NGS may be the most optimal methodology to detect EGFR mutations in patients with NSCLC compared with Sanger sequencing and real-time PCR platforms from accuracy and comprehensiveness aspects, but some other issues, such as Turn Around Time (TAT), still should be considered in clinical practice.

Complex EGFR mutations with secondary T790M mutation confer shorter osimertinib progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

ObjectivesOsimertinib is active against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its efficacy against complex EGFR mutations with T790M has not been evaluated. Materials and methodsIn order to detect complex EGFR mutations, we consecutively sequenced cancer tissues by RNA reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Patients with advanced NSCLC with activating EGFR mutation and secondary T790M who received osimertinib were enrolled. Patients’ clinicopathologic characteristics, prior treatment details, and osimertinib treatment outcomes were analyzed. ResultsTotally, 165 sequenced patients were analyzed. Eleven (7%) of them had complex EGFR mutations with T790M. The osimertinib response rate was 27%. They had a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (median, 2.9 and 9.7 months, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (median, 17.8 and 31.0 months, p = 0.01) than patients with a single EGFR mutation with T790M. After osimertinib failure, seven patients received rebiopsy with molecular analysis. Four lost the T790M, two transformed to small cell and one acquired C797S. Moreover, taking the median as the demarcation, patients received shorter prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment duration had a shorter osimertinib PFS (median, 7.3 and 13.8 months, p < 0.001) and OS (median, 21.5 and 36.7 months, p = 0.003). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed complex EGFR mutations and prior EGFR TKI treatment duration were independent factors for osimertinib PFS and OS. ConclusionsComplex EGFR mutations and shorter prior EGFR TKI treatment duration may confer shorter osimertinib PFS and OS in advanced NSCLC with secondary T790M mutation.