Single Dose Of Doxycycline Research Articles

Lyme disease chemoprophylaxis prescribing before and after pharmacist prescriptive authority in Nova Scotia.

Lyme disease is a bacterial infection transmitted to humans through bites from infected Ixodes species of ticks. Prophylaxis with a single dose of oral doxycycline following a bite from an infected tick reduces the risk of developing Lyme disease. Pharmacists in Nova Scotia (NS) were among the first in Canada to prescribe for this indication. The primary objective of this study is to describe experiences with pharmacist prescribing of prophylaxis after tick bites in NS. A retrospective cohort study was performed using health administrative data 16 months before and after pharmacists were authorized to prescribe Lyme disease chemoprophylaxis (August 1, 2021). All dispensations of a single dose of oral doxycycline from a community pharmacy in NS were included. Data collected included prescriber type, date, and county of dispensation. Comparisons of dispensations were completed before and after pharmacists gained prescriptive authority and relative to other prescribers. Dispensations were described descriptively. Over the study period, 12,549 single-dose doxycycline prescriptions were dispensed in NS: 3900 prescriptions were dispensed before pharmacist prescribing authorization for this indication occurred and 8649 were dispensed after. Pharmacists prescribed 61.3% of all single-dose doxycycline prescriptions following implementation of prescribing authority. An increase in single-dose doxycycline prescriptions was observed in NS. Pharmacists have become the primary prescribers for Lyme disease chemoprophylaxis in the province. Patients were willing to be assessed for chemoprophylaxis after tick exposure by pharmacists, and pharmacist prescribing for this indication suggests increased access to post-tick exposure care.

Lyme Disease Prophylaxis by Single-Dose Doxycycline in the United States, 2010-2020.

Single-dose doxycycline after high-risk tick bites can prevent Lyme disease, which disproportionately affects children. We described single-dose doxycycline dispensings in an outpatient cohort in the United States. During 2010-2020, a total of 427 105 patients received ≥1 dispensing(s); most were aged ≥65 years. Lyme disease postexposure prophylaxis may be underprescribed for some groups, including children.

Lyme disease

Abstract Lyme disease (LD) is the most prevalent vector-borne illness in the United States and Europe, caused by the tick-borne spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. LD infections are recorded in about 20,000 instances each year. The most significant risk is to people who live in coastal areas, such as the Great Lakes region, northwest California, and the Northeast. A higher risk applies to young people and people who spend much time outside in woody areas. Erythema migrans, the most common skin lesion, is caused by the deposition of spirochetes in human dermal tissue, which causes an inflammatory reaction. The prognosis is excellent if correctly and quickly addressed. Although the condition can appear clinically in many ways, the most common ones in untreated patients typically involve the heart, joints, or central nervous system. Diagnosis is typically made clinically. Doxycycline or amoxicillin are used as treatments. Cefuroxime or erythromycin are frequently used as alternatives. Ceftriaxone or penicillin G must be administered intravenously for late or severe illness. In some patients, single-dose doxycycline (200 mg orally) is frequently administered as prophylactic. Patients should be encouraged to take preventative measures to help lower risks.

1198. Lyme Disease Post-Exposure Prophylaxis by Single-Dose Doxycycline in Three Healthcare Systems

BackgroundLyme disease, the most common tickborne disease in the United States, may be prevented by taking a single 200-mg dose of oral doxycycline after a high-risk bite from a blacklegged tick. Currently, it is not known how Lyme disease post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) might vary by region and healthcare system. We identified single-dose doxycycline medication orders in three healthcare systems in states with high incidence of Lyme disease and compared associated patient and provider characteristics. MethodsElectronic health record data during 2012 – 2016 were obtained from three healthcare systems: Geisinger (Pennsylvania), Marshfield Clinic (Wisconsin), and Mayo Clinic (Minnesota/Wisconsin). Creation of analytic variables and analysis were harmonized across the three sites. Medication orders for single-dose doxycycline ≤200 mg that were accompanied by specific key words or diagnostic codes (e.g., tick bite; Lyme disease prevention) were considered evidence of PEP. Manual chart review was performed from a random subset to evaluate the algorithms used to identify PEP. ResultsAmong 2,937,585 patients with at least one medication order or clinical encounter during the study period, 14,102 single-dose doxycycline orders for Lyme disease PEP for 13,172 unique patients were identified. The typical patient receiving PEP was older (mean age 51 – 58 years), male (56 – 59%), and non-Hispanic White (81 – 98%). The annual seasonality of medication orders was bimodal, with peaks occurring during April – July and October – November. The most common encounter setting was an outpatient clinic or urgent care center (80 – 91%); medication orders after patient phone calls in the absence of an in-person visit occurred frequently (14 – 19%) in two health systems. Chart abstractions (n=600) revealed instances of PEP prescribed inappropriately (e.g., bite from a non-blacklegged tick; patient with symptoms of acute Lyme disease).ConclusionLyme disease PEP with a single dose of doxycycline was frequently prescribed in healthcare systems where there is a high incidence of Lyme disease. PEP was most commonly prescribed to non-Hispanic Whites over the age of 50 years. Public health initiatives for tickborne disease prevention should include clinician education on the appropriate use of Lyme disease PEP.Disclosures Anna M. Schotthoefer, PhD, HelixBind (Other Financial or Material Support, salary support) John Zeuli, PharmD, INSMED (Other Financial or Material Support, honoraria for educational speaking)

153. Utilization of Post-Exposure Prophylaxis to Prevent Lyme Disease in a Large US Healthcare Database

BackgroundIn the United States, at least 50,000 emergency department visits for tick bite and an estimated 476,000 Lyme disease diagnoses occur annually, with incidence of both high among children. The majority of these healthcare visits occur in the northeastern and midwestern states having high Lyme disease incidence and during the summer and fall months, corresponding to peak opportunities for exposure to blacklegged ticks. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with a single dose of doxycycline can effectively prevent Lyme disease after a tick bite that is high risk for transmission of Lyme disease. We describe characteristics of patients with dispensings of single-dose doxycycline in a large US-based system that includes patients enrolled in private and public health insurance plans.MethodsSingle-dose doxycycline (≤200 mg) dispensings during January 2009 – February 2020 were identified for patients enrolled in seven Data Partners that contributed electronic healthcare data to the Food and Drug Administration Sentinel Distributed Database, including large national insurers, an integrated delivery care network, a state Medicaid, and the 100% Medicare fee-for-service plan. We examined patient and PEP dispensing characteristics by patient age, state of residence, and month of dispensing. ResultsWe identified 408,897 patients with PEP (n=474,414 total dispensings) with a mean age of 60 years at first dispensing. Overall, there were 21 patients per 10,000 eligible members with PEP dispensings. Dispensings were less common in children (< 1 and 4 patients per 10,000 eligible members aged < 8 and 8-18 years, respectively). Most dispensings (72%) occurred in states with high incidence of Lyme disease. Seasonality of dispensings was bimodal, with most occurring during April – July and October – November (71 – 83%, by year). ConclusionLyme disease PEP was relatively common and mirrored geographic and seasonal trends observed for ED visits for tick bites and Lyme disease diagnoses. However, we observed more PEP among older adults, and few dispensings among children. Despite healthcare visits for tick bites and Lyme disease occurring disproportionately among pediatric age groups, PEP appears to be underutilized in children.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Tick-Borne Illness in the United States.

The Wilderness Medical Society convened an expert panel to develop evidence-based guidelines for the prevention and management of tick-borne illness (TBI). Recommendations are graded based on quality of supporting evidence according to criteria put forth by the American College of Chest Physicians. The guidelines include a brief review of the clinical presentation, epidemiology, prevention, and management of TBI in the United States, with a primary focus on interventions that are appropriate for resource-limited settings. Strong recommendations are provided for the use of DEET, picaridin, and permethrin; tick checks; washing and drying clothing at high temperatures; mechanical tick removal within 36 h of attachment; single-dose doxycycline for high-risk Lyme disease exposures versus "watchful waiting;" evacuation from backcountry settings for symptomatic tick exposures; and TBI education programs. Weak recommendations are provided for the use of light-colored clothing; insect repellents other than DEET, picaridin, and permethrin; and showering after exposure to tick habitat. Weak recommendations are also provided against passive methods of tick removal, including the use of systemic and local treatments. There was insufficient evidence to support the use of long-sleeved clothing and the avoidance of tick habitat such as long grasses and leaf litter. Although there was sound evidence supporting Lyme disease vaccination, a grade was not offered as the vaccine is not currently available for use in the United States.

Current Evidence on the Antimicrobial Treatment and Chemoprophylaxis of Human Leptospirosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonotic infection, and its management needs to be refined. This study aims to discern which antibiotic would be the best option to treat leptospirosis disease and analyze the efficacy of chemoprophylaxis regimens to prevent this illness. Methods: systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of antibiotic treatment and chemoprophylaxis of leptospirosis in humans. Results: Ten clinical trials compared an antibiotic treatment with placebo or other antibiotic treatments in leptospirosis (the most recent one was published in 2007). The meta-analysis shows no effect of penicillin treatment on mortality compared to placebo (OR 1.65; 95% CI 0.76–3.57; p = 0.21). There are no differences between penicillin and cephalosporins or doxycycline. Penicillin does not reduce the time of defervescence (MD-0.16; 95% CI (−1.4) –1.08; p = 0.80) nor hospital stay (MD 0.15; 95% CI (−0.75)–1.06; p = 0.74). Besides, the data did not demonstrate any effectiveness of the use of penicillin in terms of the incidence of oliguria/anuria, the need for dialysis treatment, time to creatinine normalization, incidence of jaundice, or the liver function normalization time. Eight trials have assessed prophylactic treatment against leptospirosis with different strategies. A weekly dose of 200 mg of doxycycline does not show benefit versus placebo regarding the number of new cases of symptomatic leptospirosis (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.02–1.87; p = 0.16). A single dose of doxycycline at exposure to flood water could have a beneficial effect (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.07–0.77; p = 0.02). None of the other chemoprophylaxis regimens tested have shown a statistically significant effect on the number of new symptomatic cases. Conclusion: There is no evidence that antibiotics are a better treatment than placebo regarding mortality, shortening of fever, liver and kidney function, or reduction in the hospital stay. On the other hand, neither doxycycline nor penicillin, nor azithromycin have shown statistically significant differences in preventing symptomatic infection. Well-designed clinical trials, including other antibiotics such as quinolones or aminoglycosides, are urgently needed to improve our understanding of the treatment for this infection, which continues to be a neglected disease.

Challenges in Treating Chlamydia trachomatis, Including Rectal Infections: Is It Time to Go Back to Doxycycline?

To evaluate recent publications on efficacy of single-dose azithromycin and 7-day doxycycline when treating Chlamydia trachomatis. A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane library was conducted (1990 to June 13, 2021) using the terms: Chlamydia trachomatis, genital chlamydia, rectal chlamydia, extragenital chlamydia, azithromycin, doxycycline, and treatment guidelines. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched to identify ongoing trials. English language studies, including controlled studies, retrospective analyses, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and case reports, reporting microbiological or clinical outcomes in adolescents and adults were considered. Systemic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials reported azithromycin efficacy of 96% to 97% in genital chlamydia. However, reports of treatment failure have emerged, especially among symptomatic males, with an increased risk of microbiological failure after azithromycin than doxycycline (relative risk = 2.45; 95% CI = 1.36-4.41). Retrospective analyses and prospective observational cohort studies reported lower efficacy range following azithromycin than doxycycline (74%-87% vs 92%-100%, respectively) in rectal chlamydia. First randomized controlled trial comparing azithromycin and doxycycline reported significantly higher microbiological cure following doxycycline, with absolute difference of 26% (95% CI = 16%-36%; P < 0.001). The proposed 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention treatment guidelines designate doxycycline as the preferred agent for treatment at any site. A growing body of evidence for treatment failure following azithromycin, especially in rectal chlamydia supports updating current practice. Doxycycline continues to achieve high efficacy in genital and rectal chlamydia. Clinicians should consider efficacy with convenience of dosing regimen, medication compliance, and sexual behavior risks when treating chlamydia infections.

Aggregation of data from 4 clinical studies demonstrating efficacy of single-dose doxycycline postexposure for prevention of the spirochetal infections: Lyme disease, syphilis, and tick-borne relapsing fever

Single-dose doxycycline, given within 72 hours of exposure, has been evaluated in 4 clinical studies for postexposure prophylaxis of 3 spirochetal infections: Lyme disease, syphilis, and tick-borne relapsing fever. In this study, data from the 4 studies were aggregated using a meta-analytic random-effects approach, with the DerSimonian-Laird method for variance estimation, analyzing a total of 2468 subjects. The findings of this analysis demonstrated an overall efficacy rate for prevention of the 3 spirochetal infections of 78% (95% confidence interval: 50%–91%).

A single dose of doxycycline after an ixodes ricinus tick bite to prevent Lyme borreliosis: An open-label randomized controlled trial

ObjectivesA single dose of doxycycline after a tick bite can prevent the development of Lyme borreliosis in North America, but extrapolation to Europe is hampered by differences in Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies and tick species. We assessed the efficacy of prophylaxis after a tick bite in Europe. MethodsWe conducted an open-label randomized controlled trial, administering a single dose of 200 mg doxycycline within 72 h after removing an attached tick from the skin, compared to no treatment. Potential participants ≥ 8 years of age who reported a recent tick bite online were invited for the study. After informed consent, they were randomly assigned to either the prophylaxis or the no-treatment group. Participants in the prophylaxis group were asked to visit their general practitioner to administer the antibiotics. All participants were followed up by online questionnaires. Our primary outcome was the development of physician-confirmed Lyme borreliosis in a modified-intention-to-treat analysis. This study is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR3953) and is closed. ResultsBetween April 11, 2013, and June 10, 2015, 3538 potential participants were randomized, of whom 1689 were included in the modified-intention-to-treat analysis. 10 cases of Lyme borreliosis were reported out of 1041 participants (0.96%) in the prophylaxis group, and 19 cases out of 648 no-treatment participants (2.9%), resulting in a relative risk reduction of 67% (95% CI 31 - 84%), and a number-needed-to-treat of 51 (95% CI 29 - 180). No serious adverse events were reported. ConclusionsThis primary care-based trial provides evidence that a single dose of doxycycline can prevent the development of Lyme borreliosis after an Ixodes ricinus tick bite.

1614. Single-Dose Doxycycline as Lyme Disease Post-Exposure Prophylaxis in a National Commercial Insurance Claims Database―the United States, 2014–2017

BackgroundApproximately 300,000 cases of Lyme disease occur annually in the UNITED STATES, with children aged 5–9 years disproportionately affected. A single dose of doxycycline administered within 72 hours of a high-risk tick bite is recommended for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to prevent Lyme disease in areas of high incidence. However, it is not known how often or for which patients PEP is used. We aimed to describe recent patterns of single-dose doxycycline medication claims in states with high and low Lyme disease incidence, and the associated patient and prescription characteristics in a large national commercial insurance claims database.MethodsOutpatient medication claims in the IBM Watson Health MarketScan Database®, a large nation-wide database of de-identified insurance claims filed between January 1, 2014–December 31, 2017 were reviewed. Claims of single-dose doxycycline were identified and associated patient demographics and medication characteristics were analyzed.ResultsDuring 2014–2017, 66,210 medication claims for single-dose doxycycline were filed by 63,112 enrollees; mean annual incidence of receiving at least one single-dose doxycycline prescription was 56 per 100,000 enrollees. Mean patient age was 43 years (IQR 33–56 years); only 8% were for children aged <18 years. About half (46%) were male patients. Most claims (71%) were made by patients residing in the 14 states with high Lyme disease incidence, defined as an average annual incidence of ≥ 10 confirmed Lyme disease cases per 100,000 population. The majority (80%) of medication claims were during the 6 months of peak tick activity (April–July for nymphal ticks and October–November for adult ticks).ConclusionSingle-dose doxycycline medication claims are common in states with high Lyme disease incidence and are highest during months of peak tick activity, consistent with the assumption that most single-dose doxycycline is used for Lyme disease PEP. Use of single-dose doxycycline to prevent Lyme disease is infrequent in children, despite being a group at high risk for Lyme disease. Efforts to educate pediatric healthcare providers and parents should be made to increase Lyme disease PEP access for children.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Threat Memory Reminder Under Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Inhibitor Doxycycline Globally Reduces Subsequent Memory Plasticity.

Associative memory can be rendered malleable by a reminder. Blocking the ensuing reconsolidation process is suggested as a therapeutic target for unwanted aversive memories. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is required for structural synapse remodeling involved in memory consolidation. Inhibiting MMP-9 with doxycycline is suggested to attenuate human threat conditioning. Here, we investigated whether MMP-9 inhibition also interferes with threat memory reconsolidation. Male and female human participants (N = 78) learned the association between two visual conditioned stimuli (CS+) and a 50% chance of an unconditioned nociceptive stimulus (US), and between CS− and the absence of US. On day 7, one CS+ was reminded without reinforcement 3.5 h after ingesting either 200 mg of doxycycline or placebo. On day 14, retention of CS memory was assessed under extinction by fear-potentiated startle. Contrary to our expectations, we observed a greater CS+/CS− difference in participants who were reminded under doxycycline compared with placebo. Participants who were reminded under placebo showed extinction learning during the retention test, which was not observed in the doxycycline group. There was no difference between the reminded and the nonreminded CS+ in either group. In contrast, during relearning after the retention test, the CS+/CS− difference was more pronounced in the placebo group than in the doxycycline group. To summarize, a single dose of doxycycline before threat memory reminder appeared to have no specific impact on reconsolidation, but to globally impair extinction learning, and threat relearning, beyond drug clearance.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Matrix metalloproteinase-9 inhibition appears to attenuate memory consolidation. It could also be a target for blocking reconsolidation. Here, we test this hypothesis in human threat conditioning. We find that doxycycline has no specific impact on a reminded cue, but confers a global reduction in extinction learning and threat learning beyond the clearance of the drug. This may point toward a more long-lasting impact of doxycycline treatment on memory plasticity.

PP121 How To Involve Patients In Decisions About Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Tick Bite

IntroductionAntibiotic prophylaxis with a single dose of doxycycline after a tick bite is one of the tools for preventing Lyme disease, which is becoming increasingly prevalent in Quebec. The aim of this work was to revisit this practice in adults and children younger than 8 years of age.MethodsTo assess the safety and absolute risk reduction (ARR) of doxycycline for preventing Lyme disease in contraindicated populations, two systematic reviews were conducted with a re-analysis of the original efficacy data. A knowledge mobilization framework was used to consider the scientific, contextual, and experiential evidence, taking into account information on patients’ and clinicians’ experiences.ResultsA single dose of doxycycline prescribed within 72 hours of being bitten by a tick (Ixodes scapularis) could prevent cutaneous manifestation of Lyme disease (ARR -2.8%, 95% confidence interval: -11.7–6.1; p = 0.06), without serious side effects, provided that the bite occurred in a geographical region where at least 25 percent of nymph and 50 percent of adult ticks are infected with the disease. However, the level of evidence was low and its generalizability to other contexts was doubtful. The decision to prescribe antibiotic prophylaxis may be based more on the fear of Lyme disease, rather than on effectiveness data and the real risk of contracting Lyme disease.ConclusionsIt may be challenging for clinicians to discuss Lyme disease prophylaxis with patients and their families in contexts where people are fearful of the disease, and the risk of contracting it from a tick bite is uncertain. Decision aids that provide scientific evidence on the real risk of developing Lyme disease after a tick bite, particularly in Quebec, can promote informed decisions based on patient preferences and values by supporting discussion between clinicians and patients.

A Single Dose of Doxycycline after an &lt;i&gt;Ixodes ricinus&lt;/i&gt; Tick Bite to Prevent Lyme Borreliosis: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial

A Single Dose of Doxycycline after an &lt;i&gt;Ixodes ricinus&lt;/i&gt; Tick Bite to Prevent Lyme Borreliosis: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial

Prophylactic antibiotics to reduce pelvic infection in women having miscarriage surgery \u2013 The AIMS (Antibiotics in Miscarriage Surgery) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe estimated annual global burden of miscarriage is 33 million out of 210 million pregnancies. Many women undergoing miscarriage have surgery to remove pregnancy tissues, resulting in miscarriage surgery being one of the most common operations performed in hospitals in low-income countries. Infection is a serious consequence and can result in serious illness and death. In low-income settings, the infection rate following miscarriage surgery has been reported to be high.Good quality evidence on the use of prophylactic antibiotics for surgical miscarriage management is not available. Given that miscarriage surgery is common, and infective complications are frequent and serious, prophylactic antibiotics may offer a simple and affordable intervention to improve outcomes.MethodsEligible patients will be approached once the diagnosis of miscarriage has been made according to local practice. Once informed consent has been given, participants will be randomly allocated using a secure internet facility (1:1 ratio) to a single dose of oral doxycycline (400 mg) and metronidazole (400 mg) or placebo. Allocation will be concealed to both the patient and the healthcare providers. A total of 3400 women will be randomised, 1700 in each arm. The medication will be given approximately 2 hours before surgery, which will be provided according to local practice. The primary outcome is pelvic infection 2 weeks after surgery. Women will be invited to the hospital for a clinical assessment at 2 weeks. Secondary outcomes include overall antibiotic use, individual components of the primary outcome, death, hospital admission, unplanned consultations, blood transfusion, vomiting, diarrhoea, adverse events, anaphylaxis and allergy, duration of clinical symptoms, and days before return to usual activities. An economic evaluation will be performed to determine if prophylactic antibiotics are cost-effective.DiscussionThis trial will assess whether a single dose of doxycycline (400 mg) and metronidazole (400 mg) taken orally 2 hours before miscarriage surgery can reduce the incidence of pelvic infection in women up to 2 weeks after miscarriage surgery.Trial registrationRegistered with the ISRCTN (international standard randomised controlled trial number) registry: ISRCTN 97143849. (Registered on April 17, 2013).

Clinical Features of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients Presenting with Cholera in Port-au-Prince, Haiti.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been postulated to alter the natural history of cholera, including increased susceptibility to infection, severity of illness, and chronic carriage of Vibrio cholerae Haiti has a generalized HIV epidemic with an adult HIV prevalence of 1.9% and recently suffered a cholera epidemic. We conducted a prospective study at the cholera treatment center (CTC) of GHESKIO in Haiti to characterize the coinfection. Adults admitted at the CTC for acute diarrhea were invited to participate in the study. Vital signs, frequency, and volume of stools and/or vomiting were monitored, and single-dose doxycycline was administered. After counseling, participants were screened for HIV by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and for cholera by culture. Of 729 adults admitted to the CTC, 99 (13.6%) had HIV infection, and 457 (63%) had culture-confirmed cholera. HIV prevalence was three times higher in patients without cholera (23%, 63/272) than in those with culture-confirmed cholera (7.9%, 36/457). HIV prevalence in patients with culture-confirmed cholera (7.9%) was four times higher than the adult prevalence in Port-au-Prince (1.9%). Of the 36 HIV-infected patients with cholera, 25 (69%) had moderate/severe dehydration versus 302/421 (72%) in the HIV negative. Of 30 HIV-infected patients with weekly stool cultures performed after discharge, 29 (97%) were negative at week 1. Of 50 HIV-negative patients with weekly stool cultures, 49 (98%) were negative at week 1. In countries with endemic HIV infection, clinicians should consider screening patients presenting with suspected cholera for HIV coinfection.

Tek doz Doksisiklin kullanımına bağlı gelişen özofagus ülseri: Bir olgu sunumu

Tek doz Doksisiklin kullanımına bağlı gelişen özofagus ülseri: Bir olgu sunumu

Lyme Borreliosis

Lyme Borreliosis

O568 A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLINDED COMPARISON OF SINGLE-DOSE PRE-OPERATIVE DOXYCYCLINE TO 5-DAY POST-OPERATIVE DOXYCYCLINE FOR THE PREVENTION OF INFECTION FOLLOWING FIRST-TRIMESTER UTERINE EVACUATION

International Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsVolume 119, Issue S3 p. S461-S461 Free communication (oral) presentations O568 A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLINDED COMPARISON OF SINGLE-DOSE PRE-OPERATIVE DOXYCYCLINE TO 5-DAY POST-OPERATIVE DOXYCYCLINE FOR THE PREVENTION OF INFECTION FOLLOWING FIRST-TRIMESTER UTERINE EVACUATION M.F. Reeves, M.F. ReevesSearch for more papers by this authorT.T. Loi, T.T. LoiSearch for more papers by this authorT.T.D. Hoang, T.T.D. HoangSearch for more papers by this authorH.V. Thang, H.V. ThangSearch for more papers by this authorL.V. Hien, L.V. HienSearch for more papers by this authorM.D. Creinin, M.D. CreininSearch for more papers by this author M.F. Reeves, M.F. ReevesSearch for more papers by this authorT.T. Loi, T.T. LoiSearch for more papers by this authorT.T.D. Hoang, T.T.D. HoangSearch for more papers by this authorH.V. Thang, H.V. ThangSearch for more papers by this authorL.V. Hien, L.V. HienSearch for more papers by this authorM.D. Creinin, M.D. CreininSearch for more papers by this author First published: 22 October 2012 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(12)60998-9AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume119, IssueS3Abstracts of XX FIGO World Congress of Gynecology and ObstetricsOctober 2012Pages S461-S461 RelatedInformation

Protective value of prophylactic antibiotic treatment of tick bite for Lyme disease prevention: An animal model

Clinical studies have demonstrated that prophylactic antibiotic treatment of tick bites by Ixodes scapularis in Lyme disease hyperendemic regions in the northeastern United States can be effective in preventing infection with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, the Lyme disease spirochete. A large clinical trial in Westchester County, NY (USA), demonstrated that treatment of tick bite with 200mg of oral doxycycline was 87% effective in preventing Lyme disease in tick-bite victims (Nadelman, R.B., Nowakowski, J., Fish, D., Falco, R.C., Freeman, K., McKenna, D., Welch, P., Marcus, R., Agúero-Rosenfeld, M.E., Dennis, D.T., Wormser, G.P., 2001. Prophylaxis with single-dose doxycycline for the prevention of Lyme disease after an Ixodes scapularis tick bite. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 79–84.). Although this excellent clinical trial provided much needed information, the authors enrolled subjects if the tick bite occurred within 3days of their clinical visit, but did not analyze the data based on the exact time between tick removal and delivery of prophylaxis. An animal model allows for controlled experiments designed to determine the point in time after tick bite when delivery of oral antibiotics would be too late to prevent infection with B. burgdorferi. Accordingly, we developed a tick-bite prophylaxis model in mice that gave a level of prophylactic protection similar to what had been observed in clinical trials and then varied the time post tick bite of antibiotic delivery. We found that two treatments of doxycycline delivered by oral gavage to mice on the day of removal of a single potentially infectious nymphal I. scapularis protected 74% of test mice compared to controls. When treatment was delayed until 24h after tick removal, only 47% of mice were protected; prophylactic treatment was totally ineffective when delivered ≥2days after tick removal. Although the dynamics of antibiotic treatment in mice may differ from humans, and translation of animal studies to patient management must be approached with caution, we believe our results emphasize the point that antibiotic prophylactic treatment of tick bite to prevent Lyme disease is more likely to be efficacious if delivered promptly after potentially infectious ticks are removed from patients. There is only a very narrow window for prophylactic treatment to be effective post tick removal.