CommentaryWhat needs to be done about reducing patient doses from CT? The North American approachReview of the NCRP Symposium on “Computed Tomography: Patient Dose”, Arlington, VA, 6–7 November 2002B F WallB F WallNational Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UKSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:5 Mar 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/13405318SectionsPDF/EPUBFull Text ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail About References 1 Sternberg S. CT scans in children linked to cancer later. USA Today 2001;01/22/01:A1. Google Scholar2 Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:289–96. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar3 Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF. Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:297–301. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar4 Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children's hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:303–6. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar5 Royal Society Study Group. Risk assessment. London: The Royal Society, 1983. Google Scholar6 International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-44: Particular requirements for the safety of X-ray equipment for computed tomography. IEC 60601-2-44 Ed. 2.1, Geneva: IEC, 2002. Google Scholar7 Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Le Heron JC, Faulkner K. Survey of CT practice in the UK Part 2: Dosimetric aspects. NRPB-R249. Chilton: NRPB, 1991. Google Scholar8 European Commission. European Guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Report EUR 16262. Luxembourg: EC, 1999. Google Scholar9 Shrimpton PC, Wall BF. Reference doses for paediatric computed tomography. Radiat Prot Dosim 2000;90:249–52. Crossref ISI, Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byAN INVESTIGATION INTO CT RADIATION DOSE VARIATIONS FOR HEAD EXAMINATIONS ON MATCHED EQUIPMENT27 January 2016 | Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 172, No. 4Maltese CT doses for commonly performed examinations demonstrate alignment with published DRLs across Europe12 October 2011 | Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 150, No. 2Developing optimized CT scan protocols: Phantom measurements of image qualityRadiography, Vol. 17, No. 2Frequency of CT Examinations in MaltaJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Vol. 42, No. 1Radiation Safety in Abdominal Computed TomographySeminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI, Vol. 31, No. 1Patient doses in CT Examinations in 18 countries: initial results from international atomic energy agency projects17 August 2009 | Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 136, No. 2Image Gently: improving health literacy for parents about CT scans for children16 December 2008 | Pediatric Radiology, Vol. 39, No. 2Informing Parents About CT Radiation Exposure in Children: It's OK to Tell ThemAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 189, No. 2Computed tomography doses in childrenThe Lancet, Vol. 363, No. 9416 Volume 76, Issue 911November 2003Pages: 761-843 © The British Institute of Radiology History RevisedJuly 31,2003ReceivedMarch 07,2003AcceptedAugust 06,2003Published onlineMarch 05,2014 Metrics Download PDF