Single Course Of Rituximab Research Articles

FC061: Renal Function is a Major Determinant of B-Cell Repopulation Following Rituximab Induction in Anca-Associated Vasculitis

Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Rituximab is increasingly used to induce and maintain remission in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). However, it remains unclear what the optimal dosing regimen is, especially in the setting of maintenance. Clinical trials have shown that vasculitis flares are unlikely as long as B-cell depletion in peripheral blood is sustained, with some evidence supporting a rituximab redosing strategy guided by B-cell-count monitoring. A better understanding of B-cell kinetics following rituximab treatment can facilitate personalized treatment approaches. This study aims to (1) describe B-cell repopulation in AAV patients treated with rituximab induction, and (2) identify clinical features predictive of B-cell repopulation. METHOD This is a single-centre, retrospective study, including AAV patients on no baseline immunosuppression who were treated with rituximab induction between December 2009 and March 2018 in the Nephrology Unit of Spedali Civili, Brescia. Only patients with available longitudinal B-cell monitoring for at least 6 months following rituximab were considered. B-cell counts were determined as CD19 + cells in peripheral blood using flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter Navios©). B-cell repopulation following rituximab was defined as CD19 + cell count >10 cells/μL, with a documented CD19 + count ≤ 10 cells/μL within the preceding year. For each patient, CD19 + cell counts were followed up to the earliest event among the following: (1) B-cell repopulation, (2) retreatment with rituximab or other induction agents, or (3) most recent observation available. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation. Flares were defined as active disease retreated with rituximab or cyclophosphamide and classified as major if one or more major items of the BVAS score v3 were present. Predictors of time to B-cell repopulation were assessed using uni- and multivariate analysis with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression, respectively. RESULTS The study cohort included 64 patients. The main clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. During a median follow-up of 33.4 months (range 7.5–101.7 months), B-cell repopulation was observed in 36 patients (56.2%). Median time from rituximab induction to B-cell repopulation was 39.8 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 33.8–69.7]. Gender, ANCA subtype, rituximab dose, steroid pulses, plasma exchange and methotrexate/azathioprine maintenance were not significantly associated with time to B-cell repopulation. In contrast, B-cell repopulation was significantly slower in patients who were older (median time to repopulation 51.6 months in patients ≥ mean age of 66.8 years old versus 33.9 months in < mean age; P = 0.044), who had microscopic polyangiitis (median 51.6 months), as opposed to granulomatosis with polyangiitis (median 33.9 months; P = 0.012) and who had lower eGFR at the time of rituximab (69.7 months in eGFR < median of 18.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 28.4 months in eGFR ≥ median; P = 0.001, Figure 1). Of these three predictors, only eGFR remained significantly associated with time to B-cell repopulation in a multivariate Cox regression model (hazard ratio for B-cell repopulation in eGFR ≥ median: 2.74, 95% CI 1.31–5.72). During sustained B-cell depletion, six vasculitis flares were observed, of which one was major (rise in creatinine > 30%) and the rest were minor (n = 4 worsening of urine abnormalities, n = 1 retro-orbital pain). CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of AAV patients treated with a single course of rituximab shows sustained B-cell depletion. Renal function emerged as the main independent predictor of B-cell repopulation, with delayed B-cell repopulation in people with kidney impairment. Only one major vasculitis flare was observed during sustained B-cell depletion. These data support the idea that longitudinal monitoring of B-cell counts can be a useful biomarker to guide rituximab dosing for maintenance in AAV, especially in patients with kidney impairment.

Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Multicenter Observational Study of 147 Patients.

The efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a subject of debate. This study was undertaken to investigate the outcomes of RTX treatment in a European SLE cohort, with an emphasis on the role of RTX as a maintenance agent. All patients with SLE who were receiving RTX as induction therapy in 4 centers were included. Patients who received a single course of RTX and those who received RTX maintenance treatment (RMT) were followed up after treatment. Disease flares during the follow-up period were defined as an increase in disease activity and the number or dose of immunosuppressive drugs. Of 147 patients, 27% experienced treatment failure at 6 months. In a multivariate analysis, a low number of previous immunosuppressive therapies (P = 0.034) and low C4 levels (P = 0.008) reduced the risk of treatment failure. Eighty patients received RMT over a median of 24.5 months during which 85 relapses, mainly musculoskeletal, were recorded (1.06 per patient). At the time of the last RTX course, 84% of the patients were in remission. Twenty-eight (35%) of 80 patients never experienced a flare during RMT and had low damage accrual. Active articular disease at the time of the first RTX administration was associated with a risk of flare during RMT (P = 0.011). After RMT, relapse-free survival was similar to that in patients receiving a single RTX course (P = 0.72). RMT is a potential treatment option for patients with difficult-to-treat disease. Relapses occur during RMT and are more likely in those with active articular disease at the time of the first RTX administration. Relapse risk after RMT remains high and apparently comparable to that seen after a single RTX course.

Compare Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Courses of Rituximab to That of Maintenance Mycophenolate Mofetil Following Single Course of Rituximab Among Children With Steroid Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome

Compare Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Courses of Rituximab to That of Maintenance Mycophenolate Mofetil Following Single Course of Rituximab Among Children With Steroid Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome

Efficacy of Rituximab vs Tacrolimus in Pediatric Corticosteroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome

Calcineurin inhibitors are an established first-line corticosteroid-sparing therapy for patients with corticosteroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (CDNS), whereas B-lymphocyte-depleting therapy is mostly used as a rescue for calcineurin inhibitor-resistant cases. The positive efficacy and safety profile of rituximab raises the question of whether it could be used as a first-line alternative to calcineurin inhibitor therapy. To compare the efficacy of rituximab and tacrolimus in maintaining relapse-free survival among children with CDNS. A parallel-arm, open-label, randomized clinical trial was performed from May 8, 2015, to September 20, 2016, with 1-year follow-up in a single-center, tertiary care unit. A total of 176 consecutive children aged 3 to 16 years with CDNS not previously treated with corticosteroid-sparing agents were screened for eligibility. The children received either tacrolimus (along with tapering alternate-day prednisolone) for 12 months or a single course of rituximab (2 infusions of 375 mg/m2). Twelve-month relapse-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Of the 176 children screened for eligibility, 120 were randomized and all but 3 patients completed 1 year of follow-up. The groups were comparable, with mean (SD) age of 7.2 (2.8) years, 32 boys (53.3%) in each group, mean (SD) disease duration of 2.5 (1.5) years and 2.3 (1.7) in the tacrolimus and rituximab groups, respectively, disease duration less than 1 year among 15 children (25.0%) in each group, median (interquartile range) of 4 (3-5) relapses in each group, and mean (SD) cumulative prednisolone dose of 246 (48) mg/kg and 239 (52) mg/kg in the prestudy year in the tacrolimus and rituximab groups, respectively. Rituximab therapy was associated with a higher 12-month relapse-free survival rate than tacrolimus (54 [90.0%] vs 38 [63.3%] children; P < .001; odds ratio, 5.21; 95% CI, 1.93-14.07). Among the patients who experienced relapse, median time to first relapse was 40 weeks in the rituximab group and 29 weeks in the tacrolimus group. Only 2 patients in the rituximab group had more than 1 relapse during the study period compared with 10 patients in the tacrolimus group. The cumulative corticosteroid dose during the 12-month study period was lower with rituximab compared with tacrolimus (mean [SD], 25.8 [27.8] vs 86.3 [58.0] mg/kg). Although both treatments were well tolerated, mild to moderate infections were twice as common in the tacrolimus group (26 [43.3%] vs 13 [21.7%] events). In children with CDNS, rituximab appears to be more effective than tacrolimus in maintaining disease remission and minimizing corticosteroid exposure and, given its good tolerability and lack of nephrotoxic effects, may be considered as first-line corticosteroid-sparing therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02438982; Clinical Trial Registry of India: CTRI/2014/01/004355.

Treatment of immunobullous conditions refractory to a single course of rituximab

Treatment of immunobullous conditions refractory to a single course of rituximab

B-cell-targeted therapy in systemic vasculitis.

The present review discusses the evidence supporting the use of B-cell-targeted therapy in the treatment of various forms of systemic vasculitis with a focus on the use of rituximab (RTX), in the antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV). Long-term follow-up of the two studies establishing the efficacy of a RTX-based induction regimen for severe AAV have demonstrated noninferiority of a single course of RTX compared with conventional therapy for remission maintenance. In addition, these observations highlight an association between relapse and B-cell reconstitution in patients treated with RTX. The maintenance of remission using rituximab in systemic ANCA-associated vasculitis trial compared a regimen of RTX infusions every 6 months to azathioprine for remission maintenance and concluded that serial RTX lead to higher rates of sustained remission.RTX is also an established therapy for cryoglobulinemic vasculitis associated with hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. Recently published data support the long-term efficacy and safety of RTX for cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. B-cell depletion with RTX is an established therapy for both remission induction and maintenance in severe AAV and in HCV-related cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. There are limited data to support use of B-cell-targeted therapy in refractory cases of other forms of systemic vasculitis such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and Takayasu's arteritis.

Blood and salivary-gland BAFF-driven B-cell hyperactivity is associated to rituximab inefficacy in primary Sjögren's syndrome

ObjectivesTo determine whether B-cell markers (blood and minor salivary gland [SG] B-cell depletion [BCD], autoantibodies, B-cell-activating factor [BAFF]) are associated with clinical response to rituximab in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). Methods45 patients with pSS were included: in group I, 14 received low-dose rituximab (two 375-mg/m2 infusions) in an open-labelled study; in group II, 17 received full-dose rituximab (two 1000-mg infusions) and 14 received a placebo in a randomized, controlled study. The proportion of SG B cells was assessed using pixel-based software analyses of digitized double-immunostained (CD3/CD20) whole SGs. Response was defined at week-24 according to the Sjögren's Syndrome Responder Index (SSRI)-30. ResultsResponse rate was 50% in both groups of rituximab-treated patients. Duration of blood BCD was similar in both groups despite the difference in rituximab dosage, and was highly correlated with residual serum-rituximab levels at week-16. SG B-cell dynamics mirrored blood B-cell levels, with a drastic decrease in SG B-cells at week-12 (group I), but an increase in ∼50% of patients in group II by week-24, in whom blood B cells had already returned. Duration of BCD was not associated with the clinical response, but responders had lower baseline proportions of SG B cells. Baseline serum BAFF level was correlated with the proportion of SG B-cells and other B-cell-activation markers, and was associated with the clinical response with higher levels in non-responders. ConclusionsIn pSS, half of the patients display an intense BAFF-driven B-cell activation and do not respond to a single course of rituximab.

Rituximab induces clonal expansion of IgG memory B-cells in patients with inflammatory central nervous system demyelination

Rituximab, a monoclonal B-cell cytolytic antibody, has beneficial effects in patients with inflammatory demyelinating diseases. So far, little data exists on B-cell subset recovery after rituximab treatment in inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). To elucidate whether rituximab promotes qualitative changes in the IgG memory B-cell repertoire we performed a single cell analysis in three patients with CNS demyelination. We did not observe any qualitative changes but detected an increased clonal expansion in the IgG memory B-cell compartment after treatment, indicating that a single course of rituximab does not eliminate specific IgG memory B-cells.

Long-Term Maintenance Therapy Using Rituximab-Induced Continuous B-Cell Depletion in Patients with ANCA Vasculitis

Remission in the majority of ANCA vasculitis patients is not sustained after a single course of rituximab, and risk of relapse warrants development of a successful strategy to ensure durable remission. A retrospective analysis of ANCA vasculitis patients who underwent maintenance therapy using rituximab-induced continuous B-cell depletion for up to 7 years was performed. Maintenance therapy with rituximab was initiated after achieving remission or converting from other prior maintenance therapy. Continuous B-cell depletion was achieved in all patients by scheduled rituximab administration every 4 months. Disease activity, serologic parameters, adverse events, and survival were examined. In the study, 172 patients (mean age=60 years, 55% women, 57% myeloperoxidase-ANCA) treated from April of 2006 to March of 2013 underwent continuous B-cell depletion with rituximab. Median remission maintenance follow-up time was 2.1 years. Complete remission (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score [BVAS] = 0) was achieved in all patients. Major relapse (BVAS ≥ 3) occurred in 5% of patients and was associated with weaning of other immunosuppression drugs. Remission was reinduced in all patients. Survival mirrored survival of a general age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched United States population. This analysis provides evidence for long-term disease control using continuous B-cell depletion. This treatment strategy in ANCA vasculitis patients also seems to result in survival rates comparable with rates in a matched reference population. These findings suggest that prospective remission maintenance treatment trials using continuous B-cell depletion are warranted.

Rituximab for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

This is an update of the Cochrane review "Rituximab for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis" (first published in The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 12).More than 80% of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience a relapsing-remitting disease course. Approximately 10 years after disease onset, an estimated 50% of individuals with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) convert to secondary progressive MS. MS causes a major socioeconomic burden for the individual patient and for society. Effective treatment that reduces relapse frequency and prevents progression could impact both costs and quality of life and help to reduce the socioeconomic burden of MS. Alternative and more effective MS treatments with new modes of action and good safety are needed to expand the current treatment repertoire. It has been shown that B lymphocytes are involved in the pathophysiology of MS and rituximab lyses B-cells via complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Current clinical trials are evaluating the role of rituximab as a B-cell depletion therapy in the treatment of RRMS. The safety and effectiveness of rituximab, as monotherapy or combination therapy, versus placebo or approved disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) (interferon-β (IFN-β), glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, mitoxantrone, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, alemtuzumab) to reduce disease activity for people with RRMS were assessed. The Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Group Specialised Register (9 August 2013). We checked the references in identified trials and manually searched the reports (2004 to August 2013) from neurological associations and MS societies in Europe and America. We also communicated with researchers who were participating in trials on rituximab and contacted Genentech, BiogenIdec and Roche. All randomised, double-blind, controlled parallel group clinical trials with a length of follow-up equal to or greater than one year evaluating rituximab, as monotherapy or combination therapy, versus placebo or approved DMDs for patients with RRMS without restrictions regarding dosage, administration frequency and duration of treatment. We used the standard methodological procedures of The Cochrane Collaboration. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Disagreements were discussed and resolved by consensus among the review authors. Principal investigators of included studies were contacted for additional data or confirmation of data. One trial involving 104 adult RRMS patients with an entry score ≤ 5.0 on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and at least one relapse during the preceding year was included. This trial evaluated rituximab as monotherapy versus placebo, with a single course of 1000 mg intravenous rituximab (on day 1 and day 15). A significant attrition bias was found at week 48 (24.0%). Patients receiving rituximab had a significant reduction in total number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions at week 24 (mean number 0.5 versus 5.5; relative reduction 91%) and in annualised rate of relapse at week 24 (0.37 versus 0.84) but not at week 48 (0.37 versus 0.72). Disability progression was not included as an outcome in this trial. More patients in the rituximab group had adverse events within the 24 hours after the first infusion (78.3% versus 40.0%), such as chills, headache, nausea, pyrexia, pruritus, fatigue, throat irritation, pharyngolaryngeal pain, and most were mild-to-moderate events (92.6%). The most common infection-associated adverse events (> 10% in the rituximab group) were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections and sinusitis. Among them, only urinary tract infections (14.5% versus 8.6%) and sinusitis (13.0% versus 8.6%) were more common in the rituximab group. One ongoing trial was identified. There is not sufficient evidence to support the use of rituximab as a disease-modifying therapy for RRMS because only one RCT was included. The quality of the study was limited due to high attrition bias, the small number of participants, and short follow-up. The beneficial effects of rituximab for RRMS remain inconclusive. However, short-term treatment with a single course of rituximab was safe for most patients with RRMS. Mild-to-moderate infusion-associated adverse events were common, as well as nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections and sinusitis. The potential benefits of rituximab for treating RRMS need to be evaluated in large-scale studies that are of high quality along with long-term safety.

Efficacy of Remission-Induction Regimens for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

BackgroundThe 18-month efficacy of a single course of rituximab as compared with conventional immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine in patients with severe (organ-threatening) antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis is unknown.MethodsIn a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial, we compared rituximab (375 mg per square meter of body-surface area administered once a week for 4 weeks) followed by placebo with cyclophosphamide administered for 3 to 6 months followed by azathioprine for 12 to 15 months. The primary outcome measure was complete remission of disease by 6 months, with the remission maintained through 18 months.ResultsA total of 197 patients were enrolled. As reported previously, 64% of the patients in the rituximab group, as compared with 53% of the patients in the cyclophosphamide–azathioprine group, had a complete remission by 6 months. At 12 and 18 months, 48% and 39%, respectively, of the patients in the rituximab group had maintained the complete remissions, as compared with 39% and 33%, respectively, in the comparison group. Rituximab met the prespecified criteria for noninferiority (P<0.001, with a noninferiority margin of 20%). There was no significant difference between the groups in any efficacy measure, including the duration of complete remission and the frequency or severity of relapses. Among the 101 patients who had relapsing disease at baseline, rituximab was superior to conventional immunosuppression at 6 months (P=0.01) and at 12 months (P=0.009) but not at 18 months (P=0.06), at which time most patients in the rituximab group had reconstituted B cells. There was no significant between-group difference in adverse events.ConclusionsIn patients with severe ANCA-associated vasculitis, a single course of rituximab was as effective as continuous conventional immunosuppressive therapy for the induction and maintenance of remissions over the course of 18 months. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; RAVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00104299.)

Therapeutic Targeting of B Cells and T Cells in Autoimmune Diabetes

Insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes (T1D) is attributable to the destruction of pancreatic β-cells by autoreactive T lymphocytes (T cells). Antibodies to various β-cell autoantigens also are detected in T1D that are not pathogenic but represent excellent markers of β-cell destruction and are widely used to identify high-risk individuals (1,2). This by no means excludes a major role for B lymphocytes (B cells) in the development and progression of T1D. Serreze et al. (3) first showed that disease-prone nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice lacking B cells were completely protected from disease, a finding explained by the capacity of B cells to present autoantigens (4). Furthermore, B cells are essential for “antigen/epitope spreading,” a central mechanism underlying the chronicity of autoimmunity that is the progressive diversification of the autoimmune response from one epitope to another, expressed by the same or by a distinct autoantigen (i.e., intramolecular spreading compared with intermolecular spreading) (5,6). All this explains the therapeutic potential of monoclonal antibodies targeting B cells or their growth factors to halt progression of T1D in NOD mice (7–10). Thus, depleting antibodies directed to the CD20 B-cell antigen efficiently prevented disease when administered to prediabetic NOD mice and, although in a low proportion of animals, also temporarily reversed T1D once hyperglycemia was established (8). Importantly, a randomized placebo-controlled phase II study conducted established that in recent-onset T1D patients a single course of rituximab, a humanized CD20 monoclonal antibody, significantly preserved endogenous insulin secretion as compared with placebo (11). However, the effect was transient and the therapeutic benefit waned as B-cell numbers recovered, implying that “operational” immune tolerance, intended as the specific inhibition of the autoimmune response in absence of chronic …

Management of secondary immune deficiencies

Management of secondary immune deficiencies

AB0526 Sustained efficacy responses and a consistent safety profile with rituximab repeat treatment over 5 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the reflex study

BackgroundIn the REFLEX study conducted in anti-TNF inadequate responder (TNF-IR) patients (pts) with RA, a single course of rituximab (RTX) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) significantly improved disease activity at...

Use of Rituximab in Refractory Dermatomyositis: A Case Report

We report a case of a 56-year-old female with a confirmed diagnosis of Dermatomyositis on muscle biopsy, which was refractory to 5 different disease modifying drugs as well as intravenous immunoglobulins and symptoms improved dramatically with a single course of Rituximab. We hereby wish to highlight the importance of Rituximab in this highly resistant case and that anti CD 20 biologic drugs can be considered as standard treatment protocol in refractory Dermatomyositis.

Phase II Trial of Lenalidomide - Rituximab +/− Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Indolent B-Cell or Mantle Cell Lymphomas Resistant to Rituximab

Abstract 266 Introduction:Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug with effects on the innate immune system that may enhance antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity as well as the development of specific anti-tumor immune responses. These immunologic effects may synergize with the action of rituximab. To test the efficacy of lenalidomide combined with rituximab, we are conducting a single center, open label phase II clinical trial in patients (pts) with indolent B-cell or mantle cell lymphomas previously resistant to rituximab. Patients and Methods: Eligible pts must have relapsed/refractory indolent B-cell or mantle cell lymphoma with measurable disease that has failed to respond or has progressed within six months of a standard course of rituximab monotherapy (375 mg/m2 weekly for at least four weeks) or a prior rituximab-containing chemotherapy regimen. Thus, all pts enrolled are considered rituximab refractory. Patients were enrolled sequentially into two treatment cohorts. In Cohort 1, pts received two 28-day treatment cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg every day and dexamethasone 8 mg once weekly (Part I: lenalidomide + dexamethasone). After assessment of response to Part I, all pts received a single course of rituximab 375 mg/m2, consisting of four weekly doses during cycle 3 (Part II: lenalidomide + dexamethasone + rituximab). Treatment with lenalidomide + dexamethasone continued during and subsequent to rituximab; stable and responding pts continued on lenalidomide + dexamethasone until disease progression or development of clinically unacceptable toxicity. Response assessment after Part II was performed three months after the first dose of rituximab. In Cohort 2, dexamethasone was eliminated; otherwise, eligibility and treatment were the same. Results: As of August 9, 2011, 45 pts have started therapy (Cohort 1, n = 27; Cohort 2, n = 18); diagnoses include: follicular (n = 28), mantle cell (n = 11), small lymphocytic (n = 4), and marginal zone (n = 2) lymphomas; median age is 58 years (range: 35–85); male: female ratio is 31:14; median number of prior therapies is 3 (range: 1 – 7); LDH is increased in 18%. For Cohort 1, 24 pts completed Part II and are evaluable for response; 3 pts are not evaluable, 1 due to death (myocarditis) and 2 due to removal from study (1 thrombocytopenia attributed to myelodysplasia; 1 rash attributed to lenalidomide). For Cohort 2, 11 pts are evaluable for response assessment after Part II; 2 pts are not evaluable due to discontinuation of protocol therapy (1 rash attributed to lenalidomide; 1 with early symptomatic progression of lymphoma); 5 pts have not completed Part II. For 35 pts completing Parts I and II, at a median follow-up of 11.8 months, PFS is 73% (95%CI: 53 – 86%). Overall response rate (ORR) after Part I is 37% (6 CR; 7 PR); ORR after Part II is 60% (12 CR; 9 PR). Overall response rates after Part II do not differ between Cohort 1 (with dexamethasone) and Cohort 2 (without dexamethasone) [58% vs. 64%, respectively; p = 0.5]. There were fewer dose interruptions during Part I in Cohort 1 (15%) versus Cohort 2 (50%) [p = 0.02], reflecting reduced episodes of tumor flare and rash in Cohort 1. Conclusions: For rituximab-resistant pts with indolent B-cell or mantle cell lymphomas, the combination of continuous daily lenalidomide and a single four week course of rituximab, with or without low-dose weekly dexamethasone, achieves a high overall response rate with relatively durable responses. The addition of low-dose weekly dexamethasone may improve tolerance without decreasing the efficacy of the lenalidomide-rituximab combination. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Safety and Effectiveness of Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Following an Inadequate Response to 1 Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor: The RESET Trial

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of rituximab (RTX) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after failure of a single tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor. Changes in patient-reported outcomes after primary treatment or retreatment with RTX and factors determining retreatment in clinical practice were also evaluated. In this phase 3b open-label, multicenter trial, patients received 2 slow infusions of RTX 1000 mg 14 days apart after premedication (primary treatment). Patients with a clinically relevant response could receive retreatment between 24 and 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was evaluation of safety. Secondary outcomes were safety of retreatment, effectiveness of primary treatment and retreatment, and changes in patient-reported outcomes after primary treatment or retreatment. Of 120 patients enrolled at 36 centers and receiving primary RTX treatment, 77 received retreatment, 112 completed the 24-week primary treatment period, and 25 completed the 48-week primary treatment and retreatment period following a single course of RTX. The most common adverse events were mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, nasopharyngitis, and headache. No infections or infusion reactions were considered life-threatening. At 24 weeks, 58%, 27%, and 7% of patients achieved American College of Rheumatology 20, 50, and 70 improvements, respectively, and similar improvements were seen after retreatment. RTX was well tolerated, with a low incidence of infusion reactions and infections. Efficacy results, including enhanced response in rheumatoid factor-positive patients, were comparable to those reported in the literature. Based on its efficacy and safety profile and retreatment schedule, RTX is an attractive treatment option for patients that have not responded to a single TNF-α inhibitor.

Rituximab Selectively Suppresses Specific Islet Antibodies

OBJECTIVEThe TrialNet Study Group evaluated rituximab, a B-cell–depleting monoclonal antibody, for its effect in new-onset patients with type 1A diabetes. Rituximab decreased the loss of C-peptide over the first year of follow-up and markedly depleted B lymphocytes for 6 months after administration. This article analyzes the specific effect of rituximab on multiple islet autoantibodies.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSA total of 87 patients between the ages of 8 and 40 years received either rituximab or a placebo infusion weekly for four doses close to the onset of diabetes. Autoantibodies to insulin (IAAs), GAD65 (GADAs), insulinoma-associated protein 2 (IA2As), and ZnT8 (ZnT8As) were measured with radioimmunoassays. The primary outcome for this autoantibody analysis was the mean level of autoantibodies during follow-up.RESULTSRituximab markedly suppressed IAAs compared with the placebo injection but had a much smaller effect on GADAs, IA2As, and ZnT8As. A total of 40% (19 of 48) of rituximab-treated patients who were IAA positive became IAA negative versus 0 of 29 placebo-treated patients (P < 0.0001). In the subgroup (n = 6) treated within 50 days of diabetes, IAAs were markedly suppressed by rituximab in all patients for 1 year and for four patients as long as 3 years despite continuing insulin therapy. Independent of rituximab treatment, the mean level of IAAs at study entry was markedly lower (P = 0.035) for patients who maintained C-peptide levels during the first year of follow-up in both rituximab-treated and placebo groups.CONCLUSIONSA single course of rituximab differentially suppresses IAAs, clearly blocking IAAs for >1 year in insulin-treated patients. For the patients receiving insulin for >2 weeks prior to rituximab administration, we cannot assess whether rituximab not only blocks the acquisition of insulin antibodies induced by insulin administration and/or also suppresses preformed insulin autoantibodies. Studies in prediabetic non–insulin-treated patients will likely be needed to evaluate the specific effects of rituximab on levels of IAAs.

Increased T Cell Proliferative Responses to Islet Antigens Identify Clinical Responders to Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody (Rituximab) Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is believed to be due to the autoimmune destruction of β-cells by T lymphocytes, but a single course of rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 B lymphocyte Ab, can attenuate C-peptide loss over the first year of disease. The effects of B cell depletion on disease-associated T cell responses have not been studied. We compare changes in lymphocyte subsets, T cell proliferative responses to disease-associated target Ags, and C-peptide levels of participants who did (responders) or did not (nonresponders) show signs of β-cell preservation 1 y after rituximab therapy in a placebo-controlled TrialNet trial. Rituximab decreased B lymphocyte levels after four weekly doses of mAb. T cell proliferative responses to diabetes-associated Ags were present at baseline in 75% of anti-CD20- and 82% of placebo-treated subjects and were not different over time. However, in rituximab-treated subjects with significant C-peptide preservation at 6 mo (58%), the proliferative responses to diabetes-associated total (p = 0.032), islet-specific (p = 0.048), and neuronal autoantigens (p = 0.005) increased over the 12-mo observation period. This relationship was not seen in placebo-treated patients. We conclude that in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, anti-B cell mAb causes increased proliferative responses to diabetes Ags and attenuated β-cell loss. The way in which these responses affect the disease course remains unknown.

Cyclophosphamide-refractory scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease: remarkable clinical and radiological response to a single course of rituximab combined with high-dose corticosteroids

We would like to report our experience of using rituximab in cyclophosphamide refractory, rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD) in a patient with limited scleroderma. A 40-year-old man presented with 10-week history of inflammatory polyarthritis, which responded to a short course of oral corticosteroids. However, 3 weeks later, he developed new onset of exertional dyspnoea. High-resolution CT of the thorax was suggestive of early ILD. Surgical lung biopsy showed features of fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia. He was diagnosed with scleroderma on the basis of: presence of anticentromere antibodies, Raynaud's phenomenon, pulmonary fibrosis, digital oedema and hypomotility along with a dilated oesophagus. He was treated aggressively with pulse doses of corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide; however, his ILD continued to deteriorate. At this stage, he received rituximab (two pulses of 1 g each), which led to a gradual clinical improvement. Now, 12 months since his rituximab infusion, he walks 2 miles daily without any exertional dyspnoea.