Single-agent Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Research Articles

5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in Cell-Free DNA Predicts Immunotherapy Response in Lung Cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) drastically improve therapeutic outcomes for lung cancer, but accurately predicting individual patient responses to ICIs remains a challenge. We performed the genome-wide profiling of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) in 85 plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples from lung cancer patients and developed a 5hmC signature that was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS). We built a 5hmC predictive model to quantify the 5hmC level and validated the model in the validation, test, and control sets. Low weighted predictive scores (wp-scores) were significantly associated with a longer PFS compared to high wp-scores in the validation [median 7.6 versus 1.8 months; p = 0.0012; hazard ratio (HR) 0.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.03-0.54] and test (median 14.9 versus 3.3 months; p = 0.00074; HR 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.50) sets. Objective response rates in patients with a low or high wp-score were 75.0% (95% CI, 42.8-94.5%) versus 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0-60.2%) in the validation set (p = 0.019) and 80.0% (95% CI, 44.4-97.5%) versus 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0-36.9%) in the test set (p = 0.0011). The wp-scores were also significantly associated with PFS in patients receiving single-agent ICI treatment (p < 0.05). In addition, the 5hmC predictive signature demonstrated superior predictive capability to tumor programmed death-ligand 1 and specificity to ICI treatment response prediction. Moreover, we identified novel 5hmC-associated genes and signaling pathways integral to ICI treatment response in lung cancer. This study provides proof-of-concept evidence that the cfDNA 5hmC signature is a robust biomarker for predicting ICI treatment response in lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic uveal melanoma: a meta-analysis

Several studies have evaluated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for metastatic uveal melanoma; however, the efficacy of ICIs in the previous studies varied greatly. In this systematic review, we searched for prospective or retrospective studies on single or dual-ICIs for metastatic uveal melanoma treatment. A random-effect model meta-analysis with generic inverse-variance was conducted, and 36 articles representing 41 cohorts of 1414 patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were included. The pooled outcomes were as follows: objective response rate (ORR) was 5.6% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 3.7–7.5%; I2, 36%), disease control rate (DCR) was 32.5% (95% CI 27.2–37.7%; I2, 73%), median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.7–2.9 months; I2, 26%), and median overall survival (OS) was 11.2 months (95% CI 9.6–13.2 months; I2, 74%). Compared to single-agent ICI, dual ICI led to better ORR (single-agent: 3.4% [95% CI 1.8–5.1]; dual-agent: 12.4% [95% CI 8.0–16.9]; P < 0.001), DCR (single-agent: 29.3%, [95% CI 23.4–35.2]; dual-agent: 44.3% [95% CI 31.7–56.8]; P = 0.03), and OS (single-agent: 9.8 months [95% CI 8.0–12.2]; dual-agent: 16.3 months [95% CI 13.5–19.7]; P < 0.001). Our analysis provided treatment outcomes as described above. Dual-ICIs appear better than single-agent ICIs for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma.

Abstract 6469: The association of mismatch repair gene alterations with elevated tumor mutational burden in microsatellite stable gastrointestinal cancers

Abstract Background: Benefit from single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor has been observed in 5-10% of the patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, a reliable predictive marker to immune checkpoint inhibitor has not been discovered in this patient population. We sought to assess the incidence of mismatch repair (MMR) gene alterations and their association with tumor mutational burden (TMB) in MSS GI cancers. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced GI cancer who had molecular profiling of the tumor using either Guardant360 blood-based or Tempus tissue next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms between 2020 and 2023. We assessed four MMR genes including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 for alterations. Continuous variables were summarized as median and interquartile range (IQR) and compared using Mann-Whitney test. Categorical variables were summarized as counts and proportions and compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results: A total of 2920 patients with Guardant360 were included with a median age of 65 (IQR: 56-73) years. 870 (30%) patients had pancreas cancer; 846 (29%) patients had colorectal cancer; 688 (24%) patients had biliary tract cancers; and the rest had other GI cancers. Among patients evaluable for microsatellite instability (MSI) status, 58 patients (2%) had MSI-high GI cancers, 31 (53%) of whom had MMR gene alterations. 2445 (98%) patients had MSS GI cancers, 130 (5.3%) of whom had MMR gene alterations. Patients with MSS GI cancers bearing MMR gene alterations had a median age of 70 (IQR: 62-75) years, significantly older than those without MMR gene alterations (p&amp;lt;0.001). In addition, patients with MMR gene alterations had significantly higher median blood TMB of 11 (IQR: 7.4-16) mut/Mb compared to 7.7 (IQR: 4.8-11) mut/Mb in patients without MMR gene alterations. In MSS GI cancers, MMR gene alterations are more commonly associated with the presence of alterations in APC (p=0.03), TP53 (p=0.01), CTNNB1 (p&amp;lt;0.001) and SMAD4 (p=0.01). 1453 patients with GI cancer and Tempus tissue NGS data were included as a validation cohort. They had comparable demographics with the Guardant360 cohort. 14 (1.6%) of 896 patients with MSS GI cancers had MMR gene alterations, significantly fewer (p&amp;lt;0.001) than those found in the Guardant360 cohort. Patients with MMR gene alterations and wild type POLE had significantly higher (p=0.001) median TMB of 9.8 (IQR: 4.8-14) mut/Mb compared to 4.7 (IQR: 3.2-6.3) mut/Mb in patients without MMR gene alterations. Conclusions: MMR gene alterations can be identified by clinical NGS platforms in a small proportion of patients with MSS GI cancers. They are associated with elevated TMB, which may suggest a hypermutated profile serving as a basis for potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitor in MSS GI cancers. Citation Format: Conor D. O'Donnell, Mojun Zhu, Hao Xie. The association of mismatch repair gene alterations with elevated tumor mutational burden in microsatellite stable gastrointestinal cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6469.

Clinical predictors of response to single‑agent immune checkpoint inhibitors in chemotherapy‑pretreated non‑small cell lung cancer.

Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard option for chemotherapy-pretreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however only a subset of patients responds to this treatment. The present study aimed at the development of a tool for personalized prediction of the efficacy of ICIs. The study included 181 epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving single-agent ICI in the second or later line of therapy. For the comparison, a total of 63 metastatic patients with NSCLC treated by chemotherapy were also analyzed. Multivariate analysis revealed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2, never-smoking status and the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥4.3 were associated with reduced progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) [ECOG PS: Hazard ratio (HR)=2.09; P=0.028 and HR=2.02; P=0.035, respectively; never-smoking: HR=3.53; P=0.007 and HR=1.80; P=0.004, respectively; NLR ≥4.3: HR=4.34; P<0.0001 and HR=4.89; P<0.0001 respectively]. Patients with an NLR <4.3, who had a favorable ECOG PS (0-1) and smoking history in the past, derived the utmost benefit from ICI [n=77; objective response rate (ORR)=35%; PFS and OS: 17.1 and 33.7 months, respectively]. The worst efficacy of ICI was observed in patients who had an NLR ≥4.3 coupled with poor ECOG PS and/or never-smoking status (n=38; ORR=8%; PFS=3.2 months and OS=7.2 months). The remaining patients belonged to the group with intermediate outcomes (n=66; ORR=17%; PFS and OS: 4.3 and 12.2 months, respectively). While combination of these factors was highly predictive for ICIs, it was not associated with outcomes of chemotherapy treatment. Easily available characteristics of the patients allow for highly accurate predictions of outcomes of single-agent ICI therapy in chemotherapy-pretreated NSCLC.

Development and Evaluation of a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model for Mechanism Interpretation and Efficacy Prediction of Atezolizumab in Combination with Carboplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Immunotherapy has shown clinical benefit in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to the limited response of monotherapy, combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy is considered a treatment option for advanced NSCLC. However, the mechanism of combined therapy and the potential patient population that could benefit from combined therapy remain undetermined. Here, we developed an NSCLC model based on the published quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP)-immuno-oncology platform by making necessary adjustments. After calibration and validation, the established QSP model could adequately characterise the biological mechanisms of action of the triple combination of atezolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with NSCLC, and identify predictive biomarkers for precision dosing. The established model could efficiently characterise the objective response rate and duration of response of the IMpower131 trial, reproducing the efficacy of alternative dosing. Furthermore, CD8+ and CD4+ T cell densities in tumours were found to be significantly related to the response status. This significant extension of the QSP model not only broadens its applicability but also more accurately reflects real-world clinical settings. Importantly, it positions the model as a critical foundation for model-informed drug development and the customisation of treatment plans, especially in the context of combining single-agent ICIs with platinum-doublet chemotherapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy

In recent years, Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are being approved for the treatment of a wide range of malignancies, and they are one of the most popular immunotherapies for tumours, bringing new hope to patients. However, single-agent ICI therapy has limited efficacy and is prone to drug resistance, and the objective remission rate of ICI alone is only 10-20% in some tumours, therefore, how to improve clinical efficacy is the key point of clinical research associated with immunotherapy. New research has found that the combination of ICIs with differing mechanisms not only improves efficacy, but also prolongs the anti-tumour effect, while an appropriate dosing regimen can effectively balance efficacy and safety. It is proposed to review the mechanism, pharmacokinetics and clinical research progress of ICI combination therapy.

A Comprehensive Review of Immunotherapy Clinical Trials for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone or in Combination, Novel Antibodies, Cellular Therapies, and Vaccines.

Urothelial cancer is an immune-responsive cancer, but only a subset of patients benefits from immune checkpoint inhibition. Currently, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the combination of pembrolizumab with the antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin are approved to treat patients with metastatic UC (mUC). Approval of first-line nivolumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin is expected imminently. Many treatment approaches are being investigated to better harness the immune system to fight mUC. In this review, we summarize the landmark clinical trials of ICIs that led to their incorporation into the current standard of care for mUC. We further discuss recent and ongoing clinical trials in mUC, which are investigating ICIs in combination with other agents, including chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and novel antibodies. Lastly, we review novel approaches utilizing bispecific antibodies, cellular therapies, and vaccines. The landscape of immunotherapy for mUC is rapidly evolving and will hopefully lead to better outcomes for patients.

Single agent vs combination immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: a review of the evidence.

The aim of this review is to outline the current landscape of advanced melanoma treatment options, provide insights on selecting combination therapies within different clinical scenarios, capture clinical relevance of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy, and explore the unmet needs with immune check-point inhibitors (ICI) in advanced melanoma. ICI based treatment consisted of single agent ICI or dual combination ICI-ICI is the standard of care of front-line treatment of metastatic or unresectable melanoma. PD-1 inhibitors (Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab) improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors (Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab). The dual ICI combination (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) provided profound and durable responses better than monotherapy, and the longest overall survival ever achieved in advanced disease, including in patients with murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF)-mutated disease, but at the cost of a high risk of severe toxicity. The new dual blockage of LAG-3 and PD-1 (Nivolumab-Relatlimab) emerges as a valid option with promising efficacy outcomes and a favourable toxicity profile. Mature survival data is still needed to capture the real benefit. These new plethora of options pose new challenges not only for optimal treatment sequencing strategies but especially for management of adverse effects, endorsing the need to integrate a holistic and personalized approach for patient care.

A single-center retrospective analysis of prognoses in patients with melanoma brain metastases and effectiveness of treatment in Japan.

Melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) has a poor prognosis, although recent treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy, have improved the prognosis. However, these systemic therapies have been reported to be less efficient for Asian patients. We investigated the survival of Asian patients with MBM and the effectiveness of systemic therapies. We retrospectively reviewed the survival rates of patients diagnosed with MBM between January 2011 and December 2021 at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo, Japan. In addition, we identified factors associated with survival using Cox regression analysis. A total of 135 patients were included. The median overall survival (OS) after an MBM diagnosis was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.1-9.6). The 6-month and 1-year survival rates were 60.7% and 34.8%, respectively. We identified the prognostic factors of MBM, including non-acral primary location, low serum LDH levels, systemic therapy of single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or targeted therapies (TTs), and radiotherapy of stereotactic irradiation (STI). We found no significant difference in effectiveness between single-agent ICIs, the combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab (COMBI-ICI), and TTs (COMBI-ICI vs. single-agent ICI, hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.27-1.88, p = 0.49; COMBI-ICI vs. TT: hazard ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.14-1.55, p = 0.21). Systemic therapy and radiotherapy have improved the survival of MBM patients, but the survival of Asian patients remains poor. Our findings suggest that COMBI-ICIs are not significantly more effective than single-agent ICI or TT in treating MBM.

Comparison of different maintenance regimens following first-line immunochemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Immunochemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the ideal combination strategy and maintenance regimen remain uncertain. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of different first-line maintenance regimens for advanced EGFR/ALK (epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma Kinase) negative NSCLC and explore the eligibility of chemo-free maintenance. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of 1,510 EGFR/ALK negative NSCLC patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment in our center from 2019 to 2021. Patients who had controlled disease after 2-6 cycles of first-line ICIs in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with or without anti-angiogenesis were included. Four maintenance regimens were analyzed: ICIs plus platinum-free chemotherapy with (group 1, I+C+A) or without anti-angiogenesis maintenance (group 2, I+C), single-agent ICIs maintenance (group 3, I) or ICIs plus anti-angiogenesis maintenance (group 4, I+A). For group 3-4, rechallenge with initial chemo-agents was given upon the first progression, those who achieved controlled disease were repeatedly followed by another chemo-free period. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Notably, for group 3-4, PFS was characterized as the duration between treatment initiation and failure of rechallenge (last disease progression). In total, 140 eligible patients in the maintenance phase were analyzed, with 20, 40, 42, and 38 patients in groups 1 to 4, respectively, displaying comparable baselines. Median PFS was similar in the I+C+A maintenance group (22.6 months), I+C maintenance group (21.0 months), and I+A maintenance group (21.5 months), whereas PFS was inferior in group 4 with I maintenance alone (13.4 months). Median chemo-free duration were 6.3 months in I maintenance group, while 13.5 months in I+A maintenance group. During the maintenance period of group 1 to 4, 25%, 25%, 19%, and 42% of patients experienced partial response (PR) again, respectively. Fifty-five percent, 65%, 48% and 61% of patients sustained durable disease control at the end of follow-up. In group 4, 39% of patients received progressive disease (PD) and rechallenge initial chemo-agents. Fifty percent of patients achieved PR and resumed to chemo-free maintenance. We showed that following first-line immunochemotherapy, chemo-free maintenance by ICIs plus anti-angiogenesis and on-demand chemo-rechallenge provided comparable efficacy to chemo-on maintenance in terms of PFS, thus allowing the minimization of cytotoxic drugs without compromising therapeutic effectiveness. In addition, anti-angiogenesis is essential during chemo-free maintenance.

Text intervention to minimize time burden of cancer care (TIME).

301 Background: Innovative strategies to mitigate the time toxicity of cancer therapy are desperately needed. We have shown that a text-based e-triage can utilize patient-reported outcomes to identify patients without immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) toxicity who could safely fast-track to ICI infusion without a pre-infusion office visit. We report the efficacy of e-triage versus usual care to minimize the time toxicity of cancer care. Methods: This hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial was conducted at Penn Medicine between December 2021 and December 2022. Eligible patients spoke English, were receiving single agent ICI for a solid tumor, and had access to a mobile device with text messaging. The e-triage arm included ICI toxicity symptom assessment via two-way text messaging 96 hours prior to scheduled ICI and routine laboratory testing. Patients on the e-triage arm with normal bloodwork and no symptoms identified by the e-triage were eligible to fast-track to ICI infusion, bypassing the pre-treatment office visit. Usual care was standard office visits. Primary endpoint was care time (total time per ambulatory encounter including commute-, wait-, infusion-, and lab-times). Secondary endpoints were patient wait time per encounter, incident emergency department (ED) or hospital visits during follow-up, health related quality of life (HRQOL) measured by The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, and patient satisfaction measured by PSQ-18. Differences in proportions of ED or hospital visits between arms were evaluated by the Fisher’s exact test. Linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts for each individual evaluated differences in all other endpoints between arms, accounting for within-patient correlation. Implementation outcomes were adoption (# patients who participated in the trial out of # approached) and fidelity (# patients on the intervention arm who followed their triage assignment). Acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness outcomes were reported previously. Results: Among 152 eligible patients, 51 consented onto study (adoption rate 33.6%) and 40 were randomized (n=21, usual care; n=19, e-triage). Patient characteristics will be presented. Of 52 encounters on the e-triage arm, 23 adhered to their e-triage assessment (fidelity rate 44.2%). Compared with the usual care arm, patients on the e-triage arm had an average of 70 minutes less care time per encounter (95% CI -123.7 to –8.08 minutes, p=0.03) and 30.1 minutes less wait time (95% CI -61 to 1.1 minutes, p=0.08). The incidence of ED or hospital visits did not differ by treatment arm (usual care, n=2, 12.5% vs. intervention, n=3, 20%, p=0.65). HRQOL and patient satisfaction scores were similar by treatment arm. Conclusions: Results from this pilot trial support further work to optimize the design and implementation of a mobile e-triage program to personalize cancer care delivery and minimize time toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT05134636 .

Uptake of palliative care services in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: The Mayo Clinic Florida experience.

269 Background: There are strong data showing that patients (pts) with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving chemotherapy experience better quality of life (QOL) and longer overall survival (OS) when palliative care (PC) services are integrated early in their treatment course. Therefore, at our cancer center, pts with stage IV NSCLC have been referred to PC by oncology providers. In this study, we evaluated the uptake of PC services, specifically in pts with NSCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICIs have been considered to have less severe or less frequent adverse effects as compared to chemotherapy, possibly leading to fewer referrals to PC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all pts at the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center in Florida who received single-agent ICI therapy for the treatment of stage IV NSCLC at any point between July 1, 2015, and July 1, 2022. The primary aim was to evaluate the uptake of PC services before or during treatment with ICIs. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize pt demographics and outcomes. Results: 129 pts were identified. 53.4% were male, and 46.6% were female. The majority of pts (84.4%) were white. 62 pts (48.0%) were seen by a PC provider before or during ICI treatment; 41 of these (31.7%) were seen by PC after starting ICI therapy. When grouped by year of ICI initiation, 30/73 pts (41.0%) treated between 2015 and June 2018 were seen by a PC provider, as compared to 15/31 pts (48.3%) treated between July 2018 and June 2020 and 17/25 pts (68.0%) treated between July 2020 and July 2022. Interestingly, the majority of pts who received PC services in the 2020-2022 group (12/17, or 70.5%) were seen by a PC provider for the first time prior to ICI initiation, whereas the majority of pts who received PC services prior to July 2020 (37/45, or 82.2%) were seen by a PC provider for the first time after ICI initiation. The mean number of PC visits increased from 1.59 in the 2015-2018 group to 1.84 in the 2018-2020 group and 4.96 in the 2020-2022 group. Conclusions: Uptake of PC services in pts with stage IV NSCLC receiving single-agent ICIs at our cancer center has increased over time, which is encouraging. Nevertheless, the numbers remain suboptimal, with less than 70% of pts receiving PC services. We plan to develop a multidisciplinary quality improvement project involving implementation of a mechanism to ensure that most patients with stage IV NSCLC, regardless of the type of systemic treatment they receive, are receiving PC services.

Immunosurveillance in clinical cancer management.

The progression of cancer involves a critical step in which malignant cells escape from control by the immune system. Antineoplastic agents are particularly efficient when they succeed in restoring such control (immunosurveillance) or at least establish an equilibrium state that slows down disease progression. This is true not only for immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but also for conventional chemotherapy, targeted anticancer agents, and radiation therapy. Thus, therapeutics that stress and kill cancer cells while provoking a tumor-targeting immune response, referred to as immunogenic cell death, are particularly useful in combination with ICIs. Modern oncology regimens are increasingly using such combinations, which are referred to as chemoimmunotherapy, as well as combinations of multiple ICIs. However, the latter are generally associated with severe side effects compared with single-agent ICIs. Of note, the success of these combinatorial strategies against locally advanced or metastatic cancers is now spurring successful attempts to move them past the postoperative (adjuvant) setting to the preoperative (neoadjuvant) setting, even for patients with operable cancers. Here, the authors critically discuss the importance of immunosurveillance in modern clinical cancer management.

Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Microenvironment and Immunecheck Point Inhibitors

With poor prognosis for patients with advanced disease, ovarian cancer continues to be the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Despite optimal treatment, the disease frequently recurs and develops chemoresistance. The tumor immune microenvironment has been predicted to play a special role in tumor development and treatment, by modifying immunosuppressive and cytotoxic responses in close proximity to tumor cells via metabolic reprogramming. A better understanding of the tumor microenvironment’s critical roles allows researchers to develop new therapeutic strategies, such as immunotherapy, to combat epithelial ovarian cancer chemoresistance. Unfortunately, the results of many clinical trials examining immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) have shown very low levels of efficacy for single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors, and research on combination treatments has not yet identified any combinations with robust activity in a large number of epithelial ovarian cancer patients. The present research will begin with a review of the main concept of immune response inside the ovarian cancer microenvironment. Then, we’ll try to figure out what role various immune checkpoint inhibitors have in the ovarian cancer microenvironment. Finally, we’ll look into several exciting treatment options, such as immune checkpoint inhibition and the body’s anti-ovarian cancer immunological response.

Differential outcomes and immune checkpoint inhibitor response among endometrial cancer patients with MLH1 hypermethylation versus MLH1 “Lynch-like” mismatch repair gene mutation

ObjectivesTo identify differential survival outcomes and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response in MLH1 hypermethylated versus MLH1 mutated (“Lynch-like”) endometrial tumors and determine whether their molecular profiles can elucidate the differential outcomes. Methods1673 mismatch repair deficient endometrial tumors were analyzed by next-generation sequencing and whole transcriptome sequencing (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). PD-L1, ER, and PR were tested by immunohistochemistry and immune cell infiltrates were calculated using MCP-counter. Significance was determined using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests and adjusted for multiple comparisons. Overall survival (OS) was depicted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. ResultsThe endometrial cancer cohort comprised 89.2% patients with MLH1 hypermethylated tumors and 10.8% with MLH1 mutated tumors, with median ages of 67 and 60 years, respectively (p < 0.01). Patients with MLH1 hypermethylated tumors had significantly worse OS and trended toward worse OS following ICI treatment than patients with MLH1 mutated tumors. The immune microenvironment of MLH1 hypermethylated relative to MLH1 mutated was characterized by decreased PD-L1 positivity, immune checkpoint gene expression, immune cell infiltration, T cell inflamed scores, and interferon gamma (IFNγ) scores. MLH1 hypermethylation was also associated with decreased mutation rates in TP53 and DNA damage repair genes, but increased rates of JAK1, FGFR2, CCND1, and PTEN mutations, as well as increased ER and PR positivity. ConclusionsEndometrial cancer patients with MLH1 hypermethylation display significantly decreased survival and discrepant immunotherapy responses compared to patients with MLH1 mutated tumors, which was associated with differential mutational profiles, a more immune cold phenotype, and increased ER/PR expression in MLH1 hypermethylated tumors. Providers may consider early transition from single agent ICI to a multi-agent regimen or hormonal therapy for patients with MLH1 hypermethylated tumors.

Do Cancer Genetics Impact Treatment Decision Making? Immunotherapy and Beyond in the Management of Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

Bladder cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed genitourinary malignancies. For many years, the primary treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) was predicated on the use of platinum-based chemotherapy. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were approved by regulatory agencies such as the US FDA for use in both the first- and second-line settings. This review outlines the approved ICIs for mUC in the second-line setting and as an alternative to chemotherapy in the first-line setting, as well as the novel agents that have also been incorporated into the treatment of this malignancy. Single-agent ICIs are often used in second-line settings in mUC, and there are three drugs currently approved for those who progress after receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. In the first-line setting, the preferred treatment regimen remains cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, single-agent ICI can be an alternative first-line treatment for those who are not candidates for cisplatin-based therapy. There are also clinical trials adding ICIs to chemotherapy as combination regimens. However, treatment for mUC has now expanded even beyond immunotherapy. Newer targeted agents such as erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor, and two antibody-drug conjugates, enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan, have been recently approved. As new drug agents are discovered, it will be important to assess both the treatment outcomes as well as the effects on patients' quality of life. Furthermore, integrating genetic and molecular information can help guide treatment decisions as next-generation sequencing is more commonly acquired during the evaluation of newly diagnosed patients with advanced and metastatic cancer.

Investigation of response factors for monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients with PD-L1 expression

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy is currently approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50%. However, the efficacy of ICI monotherapy in patients with PD-L1 expression <50% has not yet been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical characteristics of NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression <50% who respond to single-agent ICIs and factors that predict response. Patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of 50% or less who received new monotherapy with an ICI between July 2012 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with response were compared with those without response in the post-treatment response assessment. Among the 37 patients, six (16.2%) NSCLC patients in the response group responded to ICI monotherapy and had a significantly lower body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.003). Significantly more patients in the response group developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) than in the nonresponse group (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified high BMI as a significant independent risk factor predicting nonresponse to ICI monotherapy in NSCLC patients with PD-L1 < 50%. Among NSCLC patients with PD-L1 < 50%, those with a higher BMI were more likely to be nonresponders to ICI monotherapy. In addition, the group that responded to ICI monotherapy may have been at higher risk of developing irAEs, suggesting that careful follow-up is warranted.

Reversal of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment via platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer

BackgroundImmunotherapy favors patients with tumors; however, only 3–26.3% of patients with cervical cancer benefit from single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors. Combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy has been explored against tumor; however, the combination remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and the effects of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in cervical cancer to identify the clinical value of combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy. MethodsMultiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) with 11 markers (cluster of differentiation [CD]3, CD8, CD4, CD11c, CD68, forkhead box P3 [Foxp3], programmed cell death 1 [PD-1], programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 [PD-L1], indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase [IDO], cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A [p16], and cytokeratin [CK]) was performed to evaluate TIME from 108 matched pre- and post-NACT cervical cancer samples. The mechanism of antitumor immunity triggered by NACT was explored using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) from four paired samples and subsequently verified in 41 samples using IHC. ResultsThe infiltration rate of the CD8+ T cells in treatment-naive cervical cancer was 0.73%, and those of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) and IDO+ cells were 0.87% and 17.15%, respectively. Moreover, immunoreactive T cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages were more in the stromal than the intratumor region. NACT increased dendritic, CD3+ T, CD8+ T, and CD4+ T cells and decreased Tregs. The aforementioned alterations occurred predominantly in the stromal region and were primarily in responders. Non-responders primarily showed decreased Tregs and no increase in CD8+ T or dendritic cell infiltration. Furthermore, dendritic cells interacted more closely with CD3+ T cells after NACT, an effect primarily observed in responders. RNA-seq data revealed activation of the antigen receptor-mediated signaling pathway and upregulation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I and MHC II after chemotherapy, validated using IHC. ConclusionsNACT can reduce Tregs, and when tumor cells are effectively killed, antigen presentation is enhanced, subsequently activating antitumor immunity finitely. Our study provides the molecular characteristics and theoretical basis for the simultaneous or sequential combination of platinum-based NACT and immunotherapy for cervical cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced cervical cancer: Deepened response with prolonged treatment and repeat response to re-initiation of therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were approved in June 2018 for second line treatment of metastatic cervical cancer after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. A cohort of 10 patients who received single agent ICI as second line treatment was examined, with an initial analysis published in July 2021. We performed an updated review of the duration of treatment response, outcome off treatment after 2 years of therapy, and outcome after re-initiation of ICI. Excluding 4 patients from the original report who subsequently experienced progression of disease and/or death, 6 patients were followed for 40 months (range, 39.2–50.8 months), and all achieved complete response (CR) as their best response after prolonged treatment, including 3 with initial partial response (PR). Four patients discontinued treatment, and two developed asymptomatic recurrence, were both re-initiated on ICI, and reached a CR and PR. The combined positive score (CPS) was variable among responders and non-responders, but levels were highest among the 2 patients off treatment who remained without evidence of disease. This update on prolonged follow up demonstrates that patients who respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors may deepen their response with prolonged treatment, have durable response off treatment and respond again to re-treatment in the event of recurrent disease. A higher CPS score may predict prolonged remission off treatment.

Evolution of systemic therapy for advanced HCC patients: Did we make progress in 2022?

Evolution of systemic therapy for advanced HCC patients: Did we make progress in 2022?