Simvastatin Treatment In Patients Research Articles

Paraoxonase-1 and Simvastatin Treatment in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Background. Paraoxonase-1 (PON1) is the crucial antioxidant marker of high-density lipoproteins. The present study is aimed at assessing the effect of simvastatin treatment on PON1 activity and its relationship to Q192R and M55L polymorphisms in subjects with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods. The patient group was composed of 53 individuals with stable CAD, and the control group included 53 sex-matched police officers without CAD. CAD patients were treated with simvastatin 40mg/day for 12 months. Respectively, flow mediated dilatation (FMD), serum hs-CRP and TNF-α levels, urinary 8-iso-PGF2α concentrations, and PON1 activity were evaluated in definitive intervals. Results. There was no effect of simvastatin treatment on urinary 8-iso-PGF2α. Simvastatin treatment significantly increased FMD value, decreased CRP and TNF-α concentration. After adjusting for PON1 genotypes, significantly higher PON1 activity was noted in the 192R allele carriers, in both groups. Regardless of genotype, PON1 activity remained stable after simvastatin treatment. Conclusions. The present study confirms a positive effect of simvastatin therapy on endothelial function and inflammatory markers in secondary prevention. Simvastatin treatment shows no effects on PON1 activity and 8-isoprostanes level. The effect of simvastatin therapy on PON1 activity is not modulated by Q192R and M55L polymorphisms.

The Influence of Simvastatin on NGAL, Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Tissue Inhibitors in Human Intraluminal Thrombus and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Tissue

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play a pivotal role in the development and progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The action of MMPs depends on a balance between tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) and compounds that may prolong protease activity, such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). The study was designed to analyse gene expression and protein concentration of MMPs, TIMPs, and NGAL in AAA walls and intraluminal thrombi (ILTs) of patients on simvastatin (n=10) and not on statins (n=10). The patients were matched by age, sex, and AAA diameter. Expression of MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, TIMP2, and NGAL was investigated by real time polymerase chain reaction, and MMP2, MMP9, MMP9/TIMP1, MMP9/TIMP2, and MMP9/NGAL protein levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. MMP2 and MMP9 protein and mRNA levels were comparable in the simvastatin and non-statin groups (p>.05); however, there was a significant decrease in TIMP1 mRNA in AAA tissue (p=.04). Moreover, a significant increase in MMP9/TIMP2 complex concentration in ILTs of patients on simvastatin was noted (median 94.71ng/mL in the simvastatin group vs. 36.80ng/mL in the non-statin group; p=.01). No significant difference was observed for NGAL mRNA or protein content in AAA and ILT. Simvastatin treatment in patients with AAAs may influence the concentration of proteases and their inhibitors (TIMPs) in aneurysmal wall tissue and ILTs. Thus, further studies should be undertaken to understand the different influence of statin therapy on the components of the MMP/TIMP system in AAAs and ILTs.

Economic evaluation of high-dose (80 mg/day) atorvastatin treatment compared with standard-dose (20 mg/day to 40 mg/day) simvastatin treatment in Canada based on the Incremental Decrease in End-Points Through Aggressive Lipid-Lowering (IDEAL) trial

The Incremental Decrease in End-Points Through Aggressive Lipid-Lowering (IDEAL) trial demonstrated incremental cardiovascular benefit of treatment with high-dose atorvastatin (80 mg/ day) versus standard-dose simvastatin (20 mg/day to 40 mg/day) in 8888 patients with a previous myocardial infarction (MI) over a median follow-up period of 4.8 years. To assess the cost-effectiveness of high-dose atorvastatin versus standard-dose simvastatin treatment in patients with a history of MI from a Canadian societal perspective. In a within-trial analysis, end point-related events, resources used and productivity losses occurring during the IDEAL trial were aggregated by treatment arm on an intention-to-treat basis to calculate the incremental cost per event avoided. Additionally, quality-adjusted survival was projected using a lifetime Markov model. Transition probabilities, workdays lost, use of study medication and cardiovascular hospitalization rates were based on IDEAL trial data. Hospitalization, study medication and productivity costs were included. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. Compared with standard-dose simvastatin, atorvastatin 80 mg led to 0.099 fewer events per patient and cost savings over 4.8 years of treatment. Over a lifetime horizon, atorvastatin 80 mg led to 0.023 qualityadjusted life years (QALYs) gained per patient at an incremental cost of $26,795/QALY gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio remained below $50,000/QALY in 78% of 1000 simulations. Exclusion of indirect costs resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $38,834/QALY. Results were relatively sensitive to baseline age, but robust with respect to sex, baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, diabetes status and hospitalization costs. From a Canadian societal perspective, high-dose atorvastatin is cost-effective compared with standard-dose simvastatin in patients with a previous MI.

Probable Warfarin–Simvastatin Interaction

To report and discuss a case of fatal cerebral hemorrhage following a switch from atorvastatin to simvastatin in a patient taking warfarin. An 82-year-old white female was admitted to the hospital because of an international normalized ratio (INR) value greater than 8, which was detected at a routine follow-up visit to monitor warfarin therapy. Four weeks earlier her lipid-lowering therapy had been switched from atorvastatin 10 mg daily to simvastatin 10 mg daily. She had been treated with 2.5 mg of warfarin daily for almost 30 years due to episodes of deep venous thrombosis and lung embolism. Her INR had been stable within the treatment range (2.0-3.5) for more than 2 years before the INR increase. Upon hospitalization, she was given 5 mg of vitamin K orally. A few hours later she lost the feeling and movement of her right arm and a computed tomography scan showed major bleeding in the left cerebral hemisphere. She died the following day. One study has shown a lack of interaction between warfarin and atorvastatin. In comparison, 3 studies have shown significant increases (10-30%) in warfarin effect and/or reductions in dose requirement after starting concomitant simvastatin treatment. The interaction mechanism between simvastatin and warfarin is not known but is possibly associated with reduced elimination of warfarin. Use of the Naranjo probability scale showed that the likelihood of warfarin-induced INR increase following the switch to simvastatin was probable. Atorvastatin and simvastatin appear to differ in their potential to interact with warfarin. Clinicians should be aware of the interaction risk when starting simvastatin treatment in patients on warfarin therapy.

Effects of cholesterol and simvastatin treatment in patients with Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome (SLOS)

Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS) is a malformation syndrome caused by deficiency of 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase catalysing the last step of cholesterol biosynthesis. This results in an accumulation of 7- and 8-dehydrocholesterol (7 + 8-DHC) and, in most patients, a deficiency of cholesterol. Current therapy consists of dietary cholesterol supplementation, which raises plasma cholesterol levels, but clinical effects have been reported in only a few patients. Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors were shown to reduce 7 + 8-DHC levels and increase cholesterol concentrations in two small trials with divergent clinical outcome. This retrolective study evaluates the effects of cholesterol only and of cholesterol plus the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin on plasma sterols in 39 SLOS patients and on anthropometric measures in 20 SLOS patients. Cholesterol as well as additional simvastatin decreased the plasma (7 + 8-DHC)/cholesterol ratio. However, the mechanism leading to the decreasing ratio was different. Whereas it was due to an increasing cholesterol concentration in the cholesterol-only cohort, a decreasing 7 + 8-DHC concentration was demonstrated in the cohort receiving additional simvastatin. We could not confirm a positive effect of simvastatin treatment on anthropometric measures or behaviour, as previously reported.

Evaluation of HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors for Multiple Sclerosis

The disease-modifying agents currently used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) are not completely effective and are associated with adverse effects and high costs. Thus, alternative treatment options are highly desirable. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), widely prescribed as cholesterol-lowering agents, may be a future treatment option for MS--either in an add-on therapy regimen or alone--as they have been shown to exhibit potent immunomodulatory effects. Several recent reports have demonstrated that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors prevent and reverse chronic and relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, an animal model of MS. Furthermore, in vitro experiments with human immune cells have shown an immunomodulatory mode of action of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors that is comparable to that of interferon-beta, an established treatment for MS. An open-label clinical trial assessing simvastatin treatment in patients with MS revealed a significant decrease in the number and volume of new lesions, as assessed using magnetic resonance imaging, and a favourable safety profile. A large multicentre, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial assessing atorvastatin in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (i.e. a single clinical event that is indicative of demyelination, and that predisposes to the development MS) has recently been initiated. However, prospective placebo-controlled trials of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in definite MS are difficult to perform because of ethical and financial issues. Furthermore, overly optimistic reports in the popular media, as well as the often uncontrolled access to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors by patients with MS, complicate the evaluation of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors as a realistic future treatment option for MS.

3P-0813 Clinical efficacy of early simvastatin treatment in patients with the first ACS and normal level of atherogenic lipids

3P-0813 Clinical efficacy of early simvastatin treatment in patients with the first ACS and normal level of atherogenic lipids

Use of simvastatin treatment in patients with combined hyperlipidemia in clinical practice. For the Simvastatin Combined Hyperlipidemia Registry Group.

To describe and understand current care of simvastatin-treated patients with combined hyperlipidemia in routine clinical practice. A 6-month prospective observational study. Demographics, simvastatin dosage, cardiac risk factors, and lipid profile were collected from August 1997 to December 1998 at 20 sites (230 patients) across the United States. Overall mean percentage of reduction in total cholesterol levels was 27% (P<.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was 35% (P<.001), and triglyceride values was 28% (P<.001). Among those patients with low baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) values (<0.91 mmol/L [<35 mg/dL]) (N = 49), there was a 17% increase in HDL-C (P< or =.001); 35% of these patients achieved National Cholesterol Education Program HDL-C goal (ie, < or =0.91 mmol/L [> or =35 mg/dL]). Coronary heart disease (CHD) patients were given significantly higher initial doses (mean, 15.1 mg) compared with non-CHD patients (mean, 11.5 mg) (P< or =.001). Overall, 74% of patients achieved LDL-C goal (52% on starting dose, 22% after 1 titration). Among those patients who were not at goal and had a follow-up lipid profile result available, only 1 patient (2%) was at the maximum dose (80 mg); 69% were receiving 20 mg or less. Approximately 63% of patients with CHD, 80% of patients with 2 or more risk factors, and 91% of patients with fewer than 2 risk factors achieved LDL-C goal. Multiple factors contribute to LDL-C goal achievement in a usual care setting. A significant opportunity exists to increase the number of patients who achieve LDL-C goal by appropriate dose titration and/or give patients a higher initial dose of simvastatin.

Use of simvastatin treatment in patients with combined hyperlipidemia in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE To describe and understand current care of simvastatin-treated patients with combined hyperlipidemia in routine clinical practice. DESIGN A 6-month prospective observational study. Demographics, simvastatin dosage, cardiac risk factors, and lipid profile were collected from August 1997 to December 1998 at 20 sites (230 patients) across the United States. RESULTS Overall mean percentage of reduction in total cholesterol levels was 27% (P or =35 mg/dL]). Coronary heart disease (CHD) patients were given significantly higher initial doses (mean, 15.1 mg) compared with non-CHD patients (mean, 11.5 mg) (P< or =.001). Overall, 74% of patients achieved LDL-C goal (52% on starting dose, 22% after 1 titration). Among those patients who were not at goal and had a follow-up lipid profile result available, only 1 patient (2%) was at the maximum dose (80 mg); 69% were receiving 20 mg or less. Approximately 63% of patients with CHD, 80% of patients with 2 or more risk factors, and 91% of patients with fewer than 2 risk factors achieved LDL-C goal. CONCLUSIONS Multiple factors contribute to LDL-C goal achievement in a usual care setting. A significant opportunity exists to increase the number of patients who achieve LDL-C goal by appropriate dose titration and/or give patients a higher initial dose of simvastatin.

Simvastatin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and combined hyperlipidemia

Simvastatin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and combined hyperlipidemia

Decrease in plasma cholesteryl-ester transfer protein activity with simvastatin treatment in patients with type IIa hypercholesterolemia

We studied the effects of simvastatin treatment on plasma cholesterylester transfer protein (CETP) activity and lipid levels in patients with type IIa hypercholesterolemia. We treated 24 patients, 4 men and 20 women aged 49 to 81 years (mean age, 64.5 ± 8.5 years), with simvastatin at a daily dose of 5 mg for 4 weeks. Simvastatin treatment significantly decreased plasma total cholesterol (262 ± 28 mg/dL vs 220 ± 28 mg/dL) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)(181 ± 26 mg/dL vs 135 ± 28 mg/dL) and significantly increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (57.2 ± 8.4 mg/dL vs 62.8 ± 10.5 mg/dL. CETP activity significantly decreased after 4 weeks of treatment (11.2 ± 3.8%/10 μL/3 h vs 8.9 ± 3.8% 10 μL/3 h. These results suggest that one of the lipid-lowering effects of simvastatin is due to decreased CETP activity, which results in decreased LDL-C and increased HDL-C concentrations.

Plasma high density lipoprotein particle size alteration by simvastatin treatment in patients with hypercholesterolaemia

Twenty-two patients with pronounced hype rcholesterolaemia were treated with simvastatin in increasing doses, i.e. 10, 20 and 40 mg O.D. Each treatment regimen had a duration of 6 weeks. In addition to the expected low density lipoprotein (LDL)-lowering effect, simvastatin altered the plasma HDL particle size spectrum by selective elevation of the plasma HDL 2b and HDL 3a levels, as defined by polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis (gge). While the reduction in LDL cholesterol by simvastatin was dose dependent, the effect on HDL was maximal already at 10 mg daily. On treatment with simvastatin 10 mg O.D., the plasma HDL 2b and HDL 3a concentrations increased by 30% ( P < 0.001) and 12% ( P < 0.01) respectively. On the corresponding treatment with simvastatin LDL cholesterol decreased by 31% ( P < 0.001). The very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol to triglyceride ratio was significantly lowered by treatment with 10 mg simvastatin O.D. suggesting a compositional change in VLDL. Positive univariate correlations between treatment-induced decreases in plasma HDL 3b 3c levels and VLDL triglyceride concentration were seen. It is suggested that inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in hyper-cholesterolaemic subjects by simvastatin treatment alters the composition of VLDL, which may affect the close relation between HDL and VLDL, in turn producing selective elevations of the plasma HDL 2b and HDL 3a levels.

Influence of apo E polymorphism on the response to simvastatin treatment in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

In a group of 120 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (1711) the influence of the apolipoprotein E (apoE) polymorphism on pre-treatment plasma lipid levels and on the response to treatment with simvastatin was studied. The apoE phenotype distribution did not differ significantly between the FH group and a sample group of the Dutch population. Differences in pre-treatment lipid levels were not related to the apoE polymorphism in this FH population. After 12 weeks use of a daily dose of 40 mg simvastatin, the plasma total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and plasma triglyceride levels were reduced on average by 33%, 38% and 19% respectively. At the same time high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol concentration increased on average by 7%. In the combined FH patient group (males and females) a considerable interindividual variation in response to simvastatin was observed, but was not related to the apoE polymorphism. However, considering males and females separately, we found that female FH patients with the apoE3E3 phenotype responded better on simvastatin treatment with respect to LDL-cholesterol than male FH patients with the apoE3E3 phenotype.

Effect of Simvastatin Therapy on Apolipoproteins

In a Swiss multicentre trial, the effect of simvastatin treatment in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia (cholesterol > 6.5 mmol/L; triglycerides < 5 mmol/L) was investigated. 61 patients were observed during 6 weeks of therapy with simvastatin 10mg daily, and the apolipoprotein A-I, B and A-II concentrations were determined before and after therapy. The reductions in apolipoprotein B and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol by simvastatin were similar (25.9% and 27.3%, respectively). This is consistent with the current concept of enhancement of plasma clearance of LDL particles by stimulation of LDL receptors through inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis. The increase in apolipoprotein A-I is similar to the increase in high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, whereas the apolipoprotein A-II concentration remained unchanged.