Pharmacokinetics Of Simvastatin Research Articles

Genomewide Association Study of Simvastatin Pharmacokinetics

We investigated genetic determinants of single‐dose simvastatin pharmacokinetics in a prospective study of 170 subjects and a retrospective cohort of 59 healthy volunteers. In a microarray‐based genomewide association study with the prospective data, the SLCO1B1 c.521T>C (p.Val174Ala, rs4149056) single nucleotide variation showed the strongest, genomewide significant association with the area under the plasma simvastatin acid concentration‐time curve (AUC; P = 6.0 × 10−10). Meta‐analysis with the retrospective cohort strengthened the association (P = 1.6 × 10−17). In a stepwise linear regression candidate gene analysis among all 229 participants, SLCO1B1 c.521T>C (P = 1.9 × 10−13) and CYP3A4 c.664T>C (p.Ser222Pro, rs55785340, CYP3A4*2, P = 0.023) were associated with increased simvastatin acid AUC. Moreover, the SLCO1B1 c.463C>A (p.Pro155Thr, rs11045819, P = 7.2 × 10−6) and c.1929A>C (p.Leu643Phe, rs34671512, P = 5.3 × 10−4) variants associated with decreased simvastatin acid AUC. Based on these results and the literature, we classified the volunteers into genotype‐predicted OATP1B1 and CYP3A4 phenotype groups. Compared with the normal OATP1B1 function group, simvastatin acid AUC was 273% larger in the poor (90% confidence interval (CI), 137%, 488%; P = 3.1 × 10−6), 40% larger in the decreased (90% CI, 8%, 83%; P = 0.036), and 67% smaller in the highly increased function group (90% CI, 46%, 80%; P = 2.4 × 10−4). Intermediate CYP3A4 metabolizers (i.e., heterozygous carriers of either CYP3A4*2 or CYP3A4*22 (rs35599367)), had 87% (90% CI, 39%, 152%, P = 6.4 × 10−4) larger simvastatin acid AUC than normal metabolizers. These data suggest that in addition to no function SLCO1B1 variants, increased function SLCO1B1 variants and reduced function CYP3A4 variants may affect the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of simvastatin. Care is warranted if simvastatin is prescribed to patients carrying decreased function SLCO1B1 or CYP3A4 alleles.

Effects of Soy Isoflavones and Green Tea Extract on Simvastatin Pharmacokinetics and Influence of the SLCO1B1 521T > C Polymorphism.

ObjectivesGreen tea and soy products are extensively consumed by many people and they may influence the activity of drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters to result in drug interactions. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of green tea and soy isoflavone extracts on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin in healthy subjects and to clarify the role of polymorphisms in the SLCO1B1 drug transporter in this effect.MethodsThis was an open-label, three-phase randomized crossover pharmacokinetic study. A single dose of simvastatin 20 mg was taken on three occasions (without herbs, with green tea, and with soy isoflavones) by healthy male Chinese subjects. The green tea and soy isoflavone extracts were given at a dose containing EGCG 800 mg once daily or soy isoflavones about 80 mg once daily for 14 days before simvastatin dosing with at least 4-weeks washout period between phases.ResultsAll the 18 subjects completed the study. Intake of soy isoflavones was associated with reduced systemic exposure to simvastatin acid [geometric mean (% coefficient of variation) AUC0–24h from 16.1 (44.2) h⋅μg/L to 12.1 (54.6) h⋅μg/L, P < 0.05) but not the lactone. Further analysis showed that the interaction between simvastatin and the soy isoflavones only resulted in a significant reduction of AUC in subjects with the SLCO1B1 521TT genotype and not in those with the 521C variant allele. There was no overall effect of the green tea extract on simvastatin pharmacokinetics but the group with the SLCO1B1 521TT genotype showed reduced AUC values for simvastatin acid.ConclusionThis study showed repeated administration of soy isoflavones reduced the systemic bioavailability of simvastatin in healthy volunteers that was dependent on the SLCO1B1 genotype which suggested that soy isoflavones-simvastatin interaction is impacted by genotype-related function of this liver uptake transporter.

Baicalein inhibits the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin in rats via regulating the activity of CYP3A4

Context Baicalein and simvastatin possess similar pharmacological activities and indications. The risk of their co-administration was unclear. Objective The interaction between baicalein and simvastatin was investigated to provide reference and guidance for the clinical application of the combination of these two drugs. Materials and methods The pharmacokinetics of simvastatin was investigated in Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 6). The rats were pre-treated with 20 mg/kg baicalein for 10 days and then administrated with 40 mg/kg simvastatin. The single administration of simvastatin was set as the control group. The rat liver microsomes were employed to assess the metabolic stability and the effect of baicalein on the activity of CYP3A4. Results Baicalein significantly increased the AUC(0– t ) (2018.58 ± 483.11 vs. 653.05 ± 160.10 μg/L × h) and C max (173.69 ± 35.49 vs. 85.63 ± 13.28 μg/L) of simvastatin. The t1/2 of simvastatin was prolonged by baicalein in vivo and in vitro. The metabolic stability of simvastatin was also improved by the co-administration of baicalein. Baicalein showed an inhibitory effect on the activity of CYP3A4 with the IC50 value of 12.03 μM, which is responsible for the metabolism of simvastatin. Discussion and conclusion The co-administration of baicalein and simvastatin may induce drug-drug interaction through inhibiting CYP3A4. The dose of baicalein and simvastatin should be adjusted when they are co-administrated.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of two different doses of simvastatin following oral administration in dogs.

Simvastatin, used orally to treat hyperlipidemia, exhibits highly variable pharmacokinetics (PKs) in humans. The aim of this study was to investigate simvastatin PKs using noncompartmental analysis and population PK models following a single oral administration of two doses (20 and 80mg) in dogs. Forty beagle dogs were randomly divided into two groups corresponding to the two doses. Blood samples were collected from each group according to the assigned schedule after oral administration. The plasma concentration of simvastatin was determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The area under the curve and maximum concentration of simvastatin increased in a dose-dependent manner with high variability. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption (Ka =1.83hr-1 ) and first-order elimination (clearance [CL/F]=292L/h; volume of distribution in the central compartment [Vc /F]=1506L) well described the PKs of simvastatin in dogs. Large variability in the PKs of simvastatin was quantitated via modeling approaches, allowing the differentiation of between-subject variability (144.8CV% for Ka ; 94.7 CV% for CL/F; 97.5CV% for Vc /F) and residual variability (62.7%). These findings will help facilitate the development of an optimal dose regimen of simvastatin in canines with hypercholesterolemia and may be useful in developing novel formulations.

Intestinal absorption and hepatic elimination of drugs in high-fat high-cholesterol diet-induced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis rats: exemplified by simvastatin.

Altered drug pharmacokinetics is a significant concern in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients. Although high-fat high-cholesterol (HFHC) diet-induced NASH (HFHC-NASH) rats could simulate the typical dysregulation of cholesterol in NASH patients, experimental investigation on the altered drug pharmacokinetics in this model are limited. Thus, the present study comprehensive investigates the nature of such altered pharmacokinetics using simvastatin as the model drug. Pharmacokinetic profiles of simvastatin and its active metabolite simvastatin acid together with compartmental pharmacokinetic modelling were used to identify the key factors involved in the altered pharmacokinetics of simvastatin in HFHC-NASH rats. Experimental investigations via in situ single-pass intestinal perfusion and intrahepatic injection of simvastatin were carried out. Histology, Ces1 activities and mRNA/protein levels of Oatp1b2/CYP2c11/P-gp in the small intestine/liver of healthy and HFHC-NASH rats were compared. Reduced intestinal absorption and more extensive hepatic elimination in HFHC-NASH rats resulted in less systemic exposures of simvastatin/simvastatin acid. In the small intestine of HFHC-NASH rats, thicker intestinal wall with more collagen fibres, increased Ces1 activity and up-regulated P-gp protein decreased the permeability of simvastatin, accelerated the hydrolysis of simvastatin and promoted the efflux of simvastatin acid respectively. In the liver of HFHC-NASH rats, higher hepatic P-gp expression accelerated the hepatic elimination of simvastatin. Altered histology, Ces1 activity and P-gp expression in the small intestine/liver were identified to be the major contributing factors leading to less systemic exposure of drugs in HFHC-NASH rats, which may be applicable to NASH patients.

Effect of Pomelo Juice on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin, CYP3A2 Activity and Mdr1a, Mdr1b and Slc21a5 Expressions in Rats

Background: Food-drug interaction can decrease drug effectiveness or increase risk of drug toxicity. Simvastatin is widely used for treatment of hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of pomelo juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin, CYP3a2 activity and Mdr1a, Mdr1b and Slc21a5 expressions in rats. Methods: Rats were divided into 4 groups including (i) control, (ii) pomelo that received pomelo juice orally twice daily for 7 days, (iii) simvastatin that received simvastatin on day 8, and (iv) simvastatin + pomelo juice. Plasma concentrations of simvastatin and simvastatin acid were analyzed using LC-MS/MS. Hepatic CYP3a2 activity was evaluated using midazolam hydroxylation assay. The expressions of hepatic and intestinal Mdr1a, Mdr1b and Slc21a5 were measured using the real-time RT-PCR. Results: Oral administration of pomelo juice for 7 days altered pharmacokinetic profiles of simvastatin and its primary active metabolite, simvastatin acid, in rats. Real-time RT-PCR analysis revealed that pomelo juice significantly suppressed the expression of intestinal Mdr1a and Mdr1b and hepatic Slc21a5. Rat hepatic CYP3a2 catalytic activity was also inhibited following pomelo juice administration. Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that there was a risk of potential drug interaction associated with inhibition of drug transporters and CYP3A caused by pomelo juice.

Fevipiprant has a low risk of influencing co-medication pharmacokinetics: Impact on simvastatin and rosuvastatin in different SLCO1B1 genotypes

Fevipiprant, a prostaglandin D2 receptor 2 antagonist, is in clinical development as a treatment for asthma. The goal of this study was to assess the potential of fevipiprant to cause drug-drug interactions (DDI) as a perpetrator, that is, by altering the pharmacokinetics (PK) of co-medications.In vitro drug interaction studies of clinically relevant drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters were conducted for fevipiprant and its acyl glucuronide (AG) metabolite. Comparison of Ki values with unbound systemic or portal vein steady-state plasma exposure of fevipiprant and its AG metabolite revealed the potential for inhibition of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) transporters (R-value of 5.99), while other targets including cytochrome P450 enzymes were not, or only marginally, inhibited.Consequently, an open-label, two-part, two-period, single-sequence clinical study assessed the effect of fevipiprant 450 mg QD on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin 20 mg and rosuvastatin 20 mg, two statins with different dependency in OATP1B1-mediated hepatic uptake, in healthy adult volunteers. The study also assessed the pharmacogenetics of the SLCO1B1 gene, which encodes OATP1B1. Clinically, fevipiprant 450 mg QD showed a low potential for interaction and increased the peak concentrations of simvastatin acid and rosuvastatin by 2.23- and 1.87-fold, respectively, with little or no impact on total exposure.Genotype analysis confirmed that SLCO1B1 genotype influences statin pharmacokinetics to a similar extent either with or without fevipiprant co-administration. In summary, fevipiprant at 450 mg QD has only minor liabilities as a perpetrator for DDI.

A population pharmacokinetic model for simvastatin and its metabolites in children and adolescents

PurposePoor adherence to dietary/behaviour modifications as interventions for hypercholesterolemia in paediatric patients often necessitates the initiation of statin therapy. The aim of this study was to develop a joint population pharmacokinetic model for simvastatin and four metabolites in children and adolescents to investigate sources of variability in simvastatin acid exposure in this patient population, in addition to SLCO1B1 genotype status.MethodsPlasma concentrations of simvastatin and its four metabolites, demographic and polymorphism data for OATP1B1 and CYP3A5 were analysed utilising a population pharmacokinetic modelling approach from an existing single oral dose (10 mg < 17 years and 20 mg ≥ 18 years) pharmacokinetic dataset of 32 children and adolescents.ResultsThe population PK model included a one compartment disposition model for simvastatin with irregular oral absorption described by two parallel absorption processes each consisting of sequential zero and first-order processes. The data for each metabolite were described by a one-compartment disposition model with the formation and elimination apparent parameters estimated. The model confirmed the statistically significant effect of c.521T>C (rs4149056) on the pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite simvastatin acid in children/adolescents, consistent with adult data. In addition, age was identified as a covariate affecting elimination clearances of 6-hydroxymethyl simvastatin acid and 3, 5 dihydrodiol simvastatin metabolites.ConclusionThe model developed describes the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and its metabolites in children/adolescents capturing the effects of both c.521T>C and age on variability in exposure in this patient population. This joint simvastatin metabolite model is envisaged to facilitate optimisation of simvastatin dosing in children/adolescents.

Effects of Silymarin on the In Vivo Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin and Its Active Metabolite in Rats.

Herein, the effect of silymarin pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin in rats was evaluated. To ensure the accuracy of the results, a rapid and sensitive UPLC–MS/MS method was established for simultaneous quantification of simvastatin (SV) and its active metabolite simvastatin acid (SVA). This method was applied for studying the pharmacokinetic interactions in rats after oral co-administration of silymarin (45 mg/kg) and different concentrations of SV. The major pharmacokinetic parameters, including Cmax, tmax, t1/2, mean residence time (MRT), elimination rate constant (λz) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0–12h), were calculated using the non-compartmental model. The results showed that the co-administration of silymarin and SV significantly increased the Cmax and AUC0–12h of SVA compared with SV alone, while there was no significant difference with regards to Tmax and t1/2. However, SV pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly affected by silymarin pretreatment. Therefore, these changes indicated that drug-drug interactions may occur after co-administration of silymarin and SV.

Role of esterase mediated hydrolysis of simvastatin in human and rat blood and its impact on pharmacokinetic profiles of simvastatin and its active metabolite in rat

Simvastatin is known as a pro-drug, which could be hydrolyzed by esterases to its active form, simvastatin acid. Although pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and simvastatin acid have been widely studied, hydrolysis of simvastatin to simvastatin acid during blood sampling and plasma preparation has been overlooked in the previous studies, leading to underestimation of simvastatin concentration and overestimation of simvastatin acid concentration in plasma. Since both efficacy and adverse drug reaction of simvastatin are highly dependent on simvastatin and simvastatin acid concentrations in vivo, accurate assessment of the two compounds are critical in their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. The current study was proposed aiming to investigate the esterase mediated hydrolysis of simvastatin in human and rat blood and its impact on the pharmacokinetic study of simvastatin and simvastatin acid. Using various esterase inhibitors including potassium florid (KF), bis(4-nitrophenyl) phosphate (BNPP), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), carboxylesterase was found to be the major esterase that hydrolyzed simvastatin in rat blood, while carboxylesterase and paraoxonase were the major esterases mediating the hydrolysis of simvastatin in human blood. Further studies using human recombinant enzymes identified simvastatin as substrates of PON1, CES1b, PON3 and CES1c with Clint of 8.75, 5.77, 3.93, and 2.45 μL/min/mg protein. Therefore, inhibition treatments with 20 mM BNPP and 50 mM KF/ 10 mM EDTA were developed to efficiently prevent the hydrolysis of simvastatin during blood sampling and plasma preparation in rat/human. The subsequent pharmacokinetics of orally administered simvastatin at 8.66 mg/kg in rats found that the Cmax and AUC0-∞ of simvastatin in absence of such esterase inhibitors in the blood sampling process were only 17.04 ± 6.60% and 15.30 ± 6.76% of those in presence of the inhibitors, whereas the Cmax and AUC0-∞ of simvastatin acid were 1.60 ± 0.30 and 1.80 ± 0.22 times of that obtained in presence of the inhibitors. Nevertheless, T1/2 of simvastatin and simvastatin acid remained the same regardless of the blood sampling method. Our current study for the first time demonstrated the importance for assessment of simvastatin stability during the blood sampling and plasma preparation process, which may be applicable to therapeutic drug monitoring of not only simvastatin but also other pro-drugs/compounds sharing similar metabolic properties.

Effect of Cilostazol on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects.

Purpose We evaluated potential drug-drug interactions between cilostazol and simvastatin, both CYP3A substrates, in healthy subjects. Methods An open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence clinical study was conducted. Seventeen subjects were given a single oral dose of simvastatin 40 mg on day 1 and multiple oral doses of cilostazol 100 mg twice daily on days 2 to 5 followed by a single dose of cilostazol and simvastatin on day 6. Plasma concentrations of simvastatin and its active metabolite, simvastatin acid, were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for pharmacokinetic assessment. Moreover, serum lipid profiles under fasting conditions were determined. Results The geometric mean ratios of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time infinity of simvastatin combined with cilostazol to that of simvastatin alone were 1.64 (90% CI, 1.38-1.95) for simvastatin and 1.31 (1.04-1.66) for simvastatin acid. In addition, coadministration with cilostazol significantly increased the maximum concentration of simvastatin and simvastatin acid, up to 1.8-fold and 1.6-fold, respectively. However, the effects of a single dose of simvastatin on serum lipid profiles were not affected notably when simvastatin was coadministered with cilostazol. Conclusions Multiple doses of cilostazol increased the systemic exposure of simvastatin and simvastatin acid following a single dose of simvastatin.

Ilexgenin A enhances the effects of simvastatin on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease without changes in simvastatin pharmacokinetics

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common cause of death in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). New therapeutic strategies which have the potential for slowing down the evolution of NAFLD and reducing CVD-related mortality are urgently needed. Statins are well recognized in the treatment of dyslipidemia, but their use in the treatment of NAFLD is limited due to the safety concerns. Ilexgenin A (IA) is one of the main bioactive compounds in ‘Shan-lv-cha’, an herbal tea commonly used in China. In the present study, we investigated the possible synergistic therapeutic effects of IA and simvastatin (SV) on NAFLD. IA or SV showed beneficial effects on the rats with NAFLD by lowering the liver weight, liver index and plasma levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, regulating abnormal metabolism of lipids and ameliorating steatosis in liver. IA significantly enhanced the hypolipidemic and anti-inflammation effects of SV. Furthermore, a sensitive, accurate, convenient and reproducible LC-MS method was developed to investigate the effects of IA on the pharmacokinetics of SV. No significant changes were observed in pharmacokinetic parameters of SV and simvastatin hydroxy acid in the IA plus SV co-treated group in comparison with those in the group treated with SV alone. The mRNA levels and activity of CYP3A1 were not altered by IA. In conclusion, the results obtained from the present study should be helpful for further clinical application of SV and IA alone or in combination.

The ocular toxicity and pharmacokinetics of simvastatin following intravitreal injection in mice.

To investigate the retinal toxicity and pharmacokinetics of simvastatin intravitreally injected into mice. Forty-eight 6-8-week-old C57BL/6J mice were used in this study. Simvastatin was intravitreally injected into the right eye of each mouse; the left eye was injected with vehicle and was used as a control. Bilateral dark-adapted electroretinography (ERG) was performed 1 and 7d following injection. Histology was examined using a combination of light, fluorescence and electron microscopy. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to determine the decay in the retinal simvastatin concentration. ERG revealed no significant changes in the simvastatin-injected eyes compared to control. Histologic studies showed normal retinal morphology in eyes injected with simvastatin up to a final vitreal concentration of 200 µmol/L. No significant changes in the number of photoreceptors, bipolar cells or ganglion cells were found. The retinal simvastatin concentration decayed exponentially, with a half-life of 1.92-2.41h. Intravitreal injection of up to 200 µmol/L simvastatin produced no signs of adverse effects in the mouse retina. Simvastatin reaches the retina shortly after intravitreal injectionand has a short half-life.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696): A Novel Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor.

Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) is indicated for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Absorption of sacubitril/valsartan and conversion of sacubitril (prodrug) to sacubitrilat (neprilysin inhibitor) was rapid with maximum plasma concentrations of sacubitril, sacubitrilat, and valsartan (angiotensin receptor blocker) reaching within 0.5, 1.5-2.0, and 2.0-3.0h, respectively. With a two-fold increase in dose, an increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was proportional for sacubitril, ~1.9-fold for sacubitrilat, and ~1.7-fold for valsartan in healthy subjects. Following multiple twice-daily administration, steady-state maximum plasma concentration was reached within 3days, showing no accumulation for sacubitril and valsartan, while ~1.6-fold accumulation for sacubitrilat. Sacubitril is eliminated predominantly as sacubitrilat through the kidney; valsartan is eliminated mainly by biliary route. Drug-drug interactions of sacubitril/valsartan were evaluated with medications commonly used in patients with heart failure including furosemide, warfarin, digoxin, carvedilol, levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol combination, amlodipine, omeprazole, hydrochlorothiazide, intravenous nitrates, metformin, statins, and sildenafil. Co-administration with sacubitril/valsartan increased the maximum plasma concentration (~2.0-fold) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (1.3-fold) of atorvastatin; however, it did not affect the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin. Age, sex, or ethnicity did not affect the pharmacokinetics of sacubitril/valsartan. In patients with heart failure vs. healthy subjects, area under the plasma concentration-time curves of sacubitril, sacubitrilat, and valsartan were higher by approximately 1.6-, 2.1-, and 2.3-fold, respectively. Renal impairment had no significant impact on sacubitril and valsartan area under the plasma concentration-time curves, while the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of sacubitrilat correlated with degree of renal function (1.3-, 2.3-, 2.9-, and 3.3-fold with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, and end-stage renal disease, respectively). Moderate hepatic impairment increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curves of valsartan and sacubitrilat ~2.1-fold.

Impact of the Herbal Breviscapine on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin in Rats: The Involvement of CYP3A4.

The effect of breviscapine injection on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and the mRNA expression of hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme was investigated with rats. The rats were pretreated for 8 consecutive days with breviscapine injection (20 mg/kg/day, i. v.), followed by administration of simvastatin through gavage (40 mg/kg). The control rats received the corresponding volume of saline solution for the pretreatment. Blood samples were collected at varied time points after simvastatin administration and the liver was harvested after the last collection of the blood sample for measurement of the CYP3A4 mRNA expression. Pre-treatment with breviscapine injection led to increased plasma concentration of simvastatin, showing 57% increase for AUC0-∞ (P<0.01), 31% increase for C max (P<0.01), and 36% decrease for the total plasma clearance, compared with the control. Pre-treatment with breviscapine injection also inhibited the mRNA expression of the hepatic CYP3A4. These findings indicate that pre-treatment with breviscapine injection could increase the plasma concentration of simvastatin, possibly by inhibiting the expression of the hepatic CYP3A4, and combined use of breviscapine with simvastatin may improve the simvastatin efficacy and reduce its adverse reactions through reduced its dosage.

GW27-e0479 Unexpected Effect of Evacetrapib on Simvastatin Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Chinese Subjects

GW27-e0479 Unexpected Effect of Evacetrapib on Simvastatin Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Chinese Subjects

Screening study for genetic polymorphisms affecting pharmacokinetics of simvastatin

Screening study for genetic polymorphisms affecting pharmacokinetics of simvastatin

Clopidogrel Has No Clinically Meaningful Effect on the Pharmacokinetics of the Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1B1 and Cytochrome P450 3A4 Substrate Simvastatin.

Simvastatin and clopidogrel are commonly used together in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 activity markedly affects the hepatic uptake of simvastatin acid, whereas both simvastatin and simvastatin acid are sensitive to changes in cytochrome P450 3A4 activity. Clopidogrel and its metabolites inhibit OATP1B1 and CYP3A4 in vitro. We studied the effect of clopidogrel on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin in a randomized crossover study. Twelve healthy volunteers ingested either a dose of placebo (control) or 300 mg of clopidogrel on day 1 and 75 mg on days 2 and 3. Simvastatin 40 mg was administered 1 hour after placebo and after clopidogrel on days 1 and 3. Plasma drug concentrations were measured for up to 12 hours. Clopidogrel 300 mg (day 1) increased the concentrations of simvastatin and simvastatin acid during the absorption phase. After clopidogrel 300 mg, the area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of simvastatin from 0 to 2 hours was 156% (P = 0.02) and its AUC(0-12 hours) was 132% (P = 0.08) of that during placebo, whereas the AUC(0-2 hours) and the AUC(0-12 hours) of simvastatin acid were 148% (P = 0.04) and 112% (P = 0.52) of control. Clopidogrel 75 mg (day 3) had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetic variables of simvastatin or simvastatin acid compared with placebo. The effect of clopidogrel seemed independent of the SLCO1B1 c.521T>C genotype. In conclusion, as clopidogrel did not have significant effects on the total exposure to simvastatin or simvastatin acid, clopidogrel does not seem to inhibit OATP1B1 or CYP3A4 to a clinically relevant extent.

Effects of Extended-Release Niacin and Extended-Release Niacin/Laropiprant on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects

The use of multiple lipid-modifying agents with different mechanisms of action is often required to regulate lipid levels in patients with dyslipidemia. During combination therapy, alterations in the pharmacokinetics of any of the drugs used and their metabolites may occur. Three separate open-label, randomized, crossover studies evaluated the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between extended-release niacin (with and without concomitant laropiprant) and simvastatin in healthy subjects. Study 1 used single doses of extended-release niacin and simvastatin; study 2 used multiple-dose coadministration of extended-release niacin/laropiprant and simvastatin in healthy subjects; and study 3 used single doses of both extended-release niacin and the coadministration of extended-release niacin/laropiprant and simvastatin in healthy Chinese subjects. During each treatment period, plasma samples were collected predose and at prespecified postdose time points for pharmacokinetic analyses. The safety and tolerability of simvastatin with and without coadministered extended-release niacin (or extended-release niacin/laropiprant) were assessed by clinical evaluation of adverse experiences. In 2 studies in healthy subjects, modest increases in exposure to simvastatin acid (by ∼60%) by extended-release niacin and extended-release niacin/laropiprant were observed. Based on the clinical experience with simvastatin, these effects are not believed to be clinically meaningful. In the third study on healthy Chinese subjects, no statistically meaningful increases in exposure to simvastatin by extended-release niacin and extended-release niacin/laropiprant were observed. In all populations examined in these studies, the coadministration of extended-release niacin and simvastatin was generally well tolerated.

Effects of four traditional Chinese medicines on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin

1. Concomitant traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) could be the reason for relative poor efficacy of statins in dyslipidemia patients in China.2. An open-label, randomized, 5-period crossover study in healthy Chinese was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction and tolerability of multiple doses of certain TCMs on a single dose of simvastatin. In each period, subjects received one of five treatments. In Treatment A, subjects received a single dose of 20 mg simvastatin. In Treatment B, C, D or E, subjects received Tong Xin Luo, Nao Xin Tong, Guan Mai Ning or Yin Xing Ye for 7 days and a single dose of 20 mg simvastatin on Day 7. The washout period was 7 days.3. The 97.5% confidence interval of the AUC0–48 h geometric mean ratio of simvastatin acid and simvastatin for simvastatin given after multiple oral doses of one of the TCMs versus simvastatin given alone were fully contained within the prespecified bounds of (0.50, 2.00).4. Exposures to simvastatin acid and simvastatin following a single dose of simvastatin alone were similar to those following coadministration of a single dose of simvastatin with multiple doses of each of the TCM preparations tested. Simvastatin and these TCMs were well tolerated.