Simultaneous Heart-kidney Transplantation Research Articles

Kidney transplant outcomes in children with simultaneous versus sequential heart-kidney transplants.

Heart transplant recipients frequently require kidney transplantation for concomitant advanced chronic kidney disease. Data on simultaneous (heart and kidney transplants performed simultaneously) versus sequential (heart transplant performed before kidney) heart-kidney transplants in children are limited. Herein, we compare kidney transplant outcomes between the two groups. We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to identify all pediatric (age <21 years) heart transplant recipients who also received a kidney transplant within 10 years of the heart transplant. We divided the study cohort into simultaneous heart-kidney and sequential heart-kidney recipients. We compared patient and death-censored graft survival using the Cox regression, adjusting for age at kidney transplant, sex, race, pre-transplant dialysis, donor type, and prior kidney transplant. We evaluated delayed graft function (defined as dialysis within the first week posttransplant) using logistic regression. Our analysis cohort included 165 recipients (86 simultaneous and 79 sequential). The incidence of delayed graft function was higher in simultaneous recipients (22.4 vs. 7.7%, p=0.017), but the difference lost statistical significance on multivariable analysis. We found no difference in patient survival (aHR 0.97; 95% CI 0.39, 2.41; p=0.95) after kidney transplant but higher death-censored kidney graft survival in sequential heart-kidney recipients compared with simultaneous heart-kidney recipients (aHR 4.26; 95% CI 1.21, 14.9; p=0.02). Sequential heart-kidney transplants are associated with higher death-censored kidney allograft survival in children compared with simultaneous heart-kidney transplants.

(1392) - Comparison of Basiliximab and Anti-Thymocyte Globulin as Induction Therapy for Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation in the Contemporary Era

(1392) - Comparison of Basiliximab and Anti-Thymocyte Globulin as Induction Therapy for Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation in the Contemporary Era

(537) - Comparative Outcomes of Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation from DBD and DDC-NRP Donors

(537) - Comparative Outcomes of Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation from DBD and DDC-NRP Donors

(965) - Incidence and Outcomes of BKV in Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multi-Center Review

(965) - Incidence and Outcomes of BKV in Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multi-Center Review

(24) - Bridge to Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation via Extracorporeal Life Support: National Outcomes in the New Heart Allocation Policy Era

(24) - Bridge to Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation via Extracorporeal Life Support: National Outcomes in the New Heart Allocation Policy Era

Subsequent kidney transplant after pediatric heart transplant: Prevalence and risk factors

Pediatric heart failure and transplantation carry associated risks for kidney failure and potential need for kidney transplant following pediatric heart transplantation (KT/pHT). This retrospective, United Network of Organ Sharing study of 10 030 pediatric heart transplants (pHTs) from 1987 to 2020 aimed to determine the incidence of waitlisting for and completion of KT/pHT, risk factors for KT/pHT, and risk factors for nonreceipt of a KT/pHT. Among pHT recipients, 3.4% were waitlisted for KT/pHT (median time of 14 years after pHT). Among those waitlisted, 70% received a KT/pHT, and 18% died on the waitlist at a median time of 0.8 years from KT/pHT waitlisting (median age of 20 years). Moderate-high sensitization at KT/pHT waitlisting (calculated panel reactive antibody, ≥20%) was associated with a lower likelihood of KT/pHT (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.95). Waitlisting for heart transplantation simultaneously with kidney transplant (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 2.01-6.92) was associated with increased risk of death on the KT/pHT waitlist. While the prevalence of KT/pHT is low, there is substantial mortality among those waitlisted for KT/pHT. These findings suggest a need to consider novel risk factors for nonreceipt of KT/pHT and death on the waitlist in prioritizing criteria/guidelines for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation.

Combined Heart Kidney Transplantation Versus Heart Transplant in Patients with Renal Failure: Contemporary Insights and Future Perspectives.

In this review, we aim to outline the criteria regarding the evaluation of patients with chronic renal disease (CKD) awaiting heart transplantation and discuss the outcomes of combined heart/kidney transplantation. Herein, we also review pathophysiology and risk factors that predispose to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with HF and after OHT. In patients with end-stage systolic heart failure (HF) and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30mL/min/1.73 m2, orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) alone is a relative contraindication, with a consensus that these patients are better served with heart-kidney transplant (HKT). However, there is significant variation between institutions regarding timing and indication for heart/kidney transplantation, with little data available to predict post-transplant outcomes. A Scientific Statement from American Heart Association was published detailing the indications, evaluation, and outcomes for Heart-Kidney Transplantation, and noted a steady rise in the incidence of heart/kidney dual organ transplants. Recently, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Multi-Organ Transplantation Committee implemented a safety net policy for heart transplant recipients who do need meet criteria for simultaneous heart-kidney transplant in 2023 but with a likely need for sequential kidney transplantation. Optimization of organ distribution and patient outcomes after cardiac transplantation requires appropriate recipient selection. This review also outlines the criteria regarding the evaluation of patients with CKD awaiting heart transplantation and outcomes of combined HKT.

High Rate of Kidney Graft Failure after Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation.

The indications and outcomes of Simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT) remain sub-optimally defined. Risk factors for renal graft failure after SHKT also remain poorly defined. We analyzed the renal graft outcomes among SHKT recipients using United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2015-2020. To evaluate for factors associated with poor renal outcomes, we compared SHKT and kidney transplantation alone (KTA) recipients using propensity score matching. Among SHKT recipients, rate of primary non-function (PNF) of kidney graft was 3%, 30-day kidney graft failure rate was 7.0%, and the 30-day post-transplant mortality rate was 4.1%. The incidence of delayed kidney graft function (KDGF) was 27.5%. Kidney graft failure was seen early post-SHKT with most common causes of patient death (43.9%) and PNF of kidney graft (41.5%). One-year and two-year patient survival was 89.2% and 86.5%, and one-year and two-year freedom from kidney graft failure was 85.4% and 82.7%, respectively. In subgroup analysis of SHKT recipients, use of pre-transplant mechanical cardiac support (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 2.57, P=0.017), higher cPRA (aOR 1.76, P=0.016), and older donor age per 10 years (aOR 1.94, P=0.001) were associated with PNF. Pre-transplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was associated with the increased risk of 30-day recipient mortality (aOR 5.55, P=0.002). Increased 30-day graft failure was seen in SHKT recipients with pre-transplant mechanical cardiac support (aOR 1.77, P=0.038) and dialysis at time of transplant (aOR 1.72, P=0.044). Multivariable Cox-Hazard analysis demonstrated that SHKT, when compared to KTA, is associated with increased kidney graft failure (Hazard Ratio, 2.56, P<0.001) and recipient mortality (Hazard Ratio: 2.65, P<0.001). SHKT is associated with high rates of kidney graft failure. Identification of risk factors for renal graft failure can help optimize recipient selection for SHKT vs Kidney after HT, especially after introduction of the new safety-net policy.

Discussion to: Simultaneous heart-kidney transplant compared with heart transplant alone in patients with borderline renal function who are not dialysis dependent

Discussion to: Simultaneous heart-kidney transplant compared with heart transplant alone in patients with borderline renal function who are not dialysis dependent

Fusarium infection in a lung transplant patient and a simultaneous heart-kidney transplant patient

Fusarium infection in a lung transplant patient and a simultaneous heart-kidney transplant patient

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplant compared with heart transplant alone in patients with borderline renal function who are not dialysis dependent

ObjectiveThis study assessed characteristics and outcomes of patients who are not dependent on dialysis receiving simultaneous heart kidney transplantation versus heart transplantation alone (HTA) to identify optimal eGFR threshold where combined transplant strategy may be superior. MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 7896 adult patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/minute from the United Network for Organ Sharing database who received HTA or simultaneous heart kidney transplant between 2005 and 2021, excluding those who received pretransplant dialysis. Subjects were further stratified into 3 groups based on chronic kidney disease stage at time of transplant: Stage 3A (eGFR 45-59 mL/minute; n = 5044), Stage 3B (eGFR 30-44 mL/minute; n = 2193), and Stage 4 or 5 (eGFR <30 mL/minute; n = 659). Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiac allograft failure, and freedom from chronic dialysis or renal transplant following heart transplant. ResultsSimultaneous heart kidney transplant and HTA recipients differed in various baseline characteristics. Simultaneous heart kidney transplant recipients with eGFR <45 mL/minute had greater short- and long-term overall survival and cardiac allograft survival compared with HTA, as well as greater long-term freedom from chronic dialysis or renal transplant. These results were consistent with both propensity matched analyses and multivariable Cox regression analysis of 10 year outcomes. Optimal cutoff value for pretransplant eGFR in predicting elevated risk of renal failure in recipients of heart transplant alone was found to be eGFR ∼45 mL/minute. ConclusionsSimilar to patients with eGFR <30 mL/minute, patients with eGFR 30 to 44 mL/minute who underwent simultaneous heart kidney transplant had superior outcomes compared with HTA, suggesting possible benefit of combined transplant strategy for this subset of heart transplant candidates.

Survival After Simultaneous Heart-kidney Transplant in Recipients With a Durable LVAD and Chronic Kidney Disease: Effect of the 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change.

Heart transplantation remains the most definitive therapy for qualified candidates with end-stage heart failure. Concomitant kidney disease is common in this population prompting an increase in simultaneous heart-kidney (SHK) transplantation in recent years. The goal of our study was to explore the effects of the 2018 heart allocation policy (HAP) change on candidate listing characteristics and compare survival rates at 1 y in patients that were supported with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) pretransplant and underwent SHK or heart alone transplant (HAT). We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and identified all adults who underwent primary SHK or HAT between January 2010 and March 2022. Recipients supported with a durable LVAD and estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 were selected (n = 309 SHK; 217 pre- and 92 post-HAP and n = 3,324 HAT; 2738 pre- and 586 post-HAP). Difference in survival at 1 y did not reach statistical significance. Comparing the 1-y survival of SHK and HAT recipients who were bridged with LVAD pre-HAP, we found no significant difference ( P = 0.694). Adjusting for the same covariates in a multivariable model did not affect the results (SHK versus HAT hazard ratio 0.84 [0.51, 1.37]; P = 0.48). In contrast, SHK recipients supported with an LVAD who were listed and transplanted post-HAP change had significantly lower 1-y survival, when compared with HAT ( P = 0.037). Our findings suggest that the HAP change had a potentially negative impact on the survival of select patients undergoing SHK transplant. Further research is warranted in this area.

Decreased survival of simultaneous heart-kidney transplant recipients in the new heart allocation era

In 2018, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) modified their heart allocation policy to reduce waitlist mortality. Rates of simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHKT) have dramatically increased in recent years, despite increased rates of post-transplant renal failure in the new policy era. This study sought to investigate the impact of the new allocation system on waitlist and post-transplant outcomes of simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation. Adult patients listed for SHKT between 2012 and 2021 were included. Patients were cross-validated across both Thoracic and Kidney UNOS databases to confirm accurate listing and transplant data. Patients were stratified according to listing era. The Fine and Gray model was used to assess waitlist outcomes and post-transplant renal graft function. Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to compare post-transplant survival. A total of 2,588 patients were included, of whom 1,406 (54.1%) were listed between 2012 - 2018 (Era 1) and 1,182 (45.9%) between 2019 - 2021(Era 2). Era 2 was associated with increased likelihood of transplant (aSHR: 1.52; p<0.01) and decreased waitlist mortality (aSHR: 0.63; p<0.01). Post-transplant survival at 2 years was decreased in Era 2 (78.8% vs. 86.9%; p<0.01). Undersized hearts (HR: 2.02; p<0.01), use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (HR: 2.67; p<0.1), and transplants performed following the policy change (HR: 1.45; p=0.03) were associated with increased mortality. Actuarial survival (combined waitlist and post-transplant) was significantly lower in the modern era (71.6% vs. 62.2%; p=0.02). The allocation policy change has improved waitlist outcomes in patients listed for SHKT, but potentially at the cost of worsened post-transplant outcomes.

Improved waitlist and comparable post-transplant outcomes in simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation under the 2018 heart allocation system

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the clinical trends and the impact of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on both waitlist and post-transplant outcomes in simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation in the United States. MethodsThe United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to compare adult patients before and after the allocation policy change. This study included 2 separate analyses evaluating the waitlist and post-transplant outcomes. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine the 2018 allocation system's risk-adjusted hazards for 1-year waitlist and post-transplant mortality. ResultsThe initial analysis investigating the waitlist outcomes included 1779 patients listed for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation. Of these, 1075 patients (60.4%) were listed after the 2018 allocation policy change. After the policy change, the waitlist outcomes significantly improved with a shorter waitlist time, lower likelihood of de-listing, and higher likelihood of transplantation. In the subsequent analysis investigating the post-transplant outcomes, 1130 simultaneous heart-kidney transplant recipients were included, where 738 patients (65.3%) underwent simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation after the policy change. The 90-day, 6-month, and 1-year post-transplant survival and complication rates were comparable before and after the policy change. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that the 2018 allocation system positively impacted risk-adjusted 1-year waitlist mortality (sub-hazard ratio, 0.66, 95% CI, 0.51-0.85, P < .001), but it did not significantly impact risk-adjusted 1-year post-transplant mortality (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.72-1.47, P = .876). ConclusionsThis study demonstrates increased rates of simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation with a shorter waitlist time after the 2018 allocation policy change. Furthermore, there were improved waitlist outcomes and comparable early post-transplant survival after simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation under the 2018 allocation system.

Heart Transplant Outcomes After Total Artificial Heart

We sought to compare heart transplant (HTX) outcomes from patients with a total artificial heart (TAH), biventricular assist device (BiVAD), or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to transplant (BTT). Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS)-Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) created a dataset with TAH or durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) who reached HTX between 2006 and 2015. The retrospective analysis compared TAH outcomes with those with a BiVAD or LVAD before HTX. The primary outcome was posttransplant survival at 1, 36, and 60 months. Secondary outcomes included simultaneous heart-kidney transplants, donor characteristics, and mortality risk factors. INTERMACS-SRTR cohort had, at the time of HTX, 2762 patients with LVAD; 205 BiVAD (139 durable and 66 temporary RVAD); 176 TAH (6 prior HeartMate II). Sixty months after HTX, mortality rates were 16.5% in the total group: LVAD 15.2%, BiVAD 22.4%, and TAH 29%. Survival differed between the LVAD, the TAH, and BiVAD but not between the BiVAD and TAH groups. One-year survival and complication rates were similar across groups-there was no difference in survival by donor age in the overall cohort. There was a difference in TTD based on recipient age in the LVAD group but not in BiVAD or TAH groups. Occurrence of HTX-kidney and post-transplant dialysis were higher in the TAH versus LVAD and BiVAD groups. The TAH is an efficacious BTT. Refinements in technology and patient selection may improve outcomes.

Dual-Organ Transplantation: Indications, Evaluation, and Outcomes for Heart-Kidney and Heart-Liver Transplantation: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Although heart transplantation is the preferred therapy for appropriate patients with advanced heart failure, the presence of concomitant renal or hepatic dysfunction can pose a barrier to isolated heart transplantation. Because donor organ supply limits the availability of organ transplantation, appropriate allocation of this scarce resource is essential; thus, clear guidance for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation and simultaneous heart-liver transplantation is urgently required. The purposes of this scientific statement are (1) to describe the impact of pretransplantation renal and hepatic dysfunction on posttransplantation outcomes; (2) to discuss the assessment of pretransplantation renal and hepatic dysfunction; (3) to provide an approach to patient selection for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation and simultaneous heart-liver transplantation and posttransplantation management; and (4) to explore the ethics of multiorgan transplantation.

Discussion to: Do age and functional dependence affect outcomes of simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation?

Discussion to: Do age and functional dependence affect outcomes of simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation?

Do age and functional dependence affect outcomes of simultaneous heart–kidney transplantation?

ObjectiveThis study assessed characteristics and outcomes of younger (18-65) versus older (>65) recipients of simultaneous heart–kidney (SHK) transplantation with varying functional dependence. MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 1398 patients from the United Network for Organ Sharing database who received SHK between 2010 and 2021. Patients who were <18 year old, underwent transplant of additional organs simultaneously, or had previous heart transplant were excluded. The primary end point was all-cause mortality, and secondary end points included adverse events and cause of death. Outcomes were also evaluated by propensity score–matched comparison. ResultsThe number of annual SHK transplantation in the United States has significantly increased among both age groups over the past 2 decades (P < .0001). After propensity score matching of recipients aged 18 to 65 years (n = 1162) versus age >65 years (n = 236), baseline characteristics were similar and well-balanced between the 2 cohorts. Between matched cohorts, older recipients did not have increased posttransplant mortality compared with younger recipients (90-day survival, P = .85; 7-year survival, P = .61). Multivariable Cox regression analysis found that age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.039 [0.975-1.106], P = .2415) and pretransplant functional status with interaction term for age (some assistance, HR, 0.965 [0.902-1.033], P = .3079; total assistance, HR, 0.976 [0.914-1.041], P = .4610) were not significant risk factors for 7-year post-SHK transplantation mortality. ConclusionsOlder and more functionally dependent recipients in this study did not have increased post-SHK transplantation mortality. These findings have important implications for organ allocation among elderly patients, as they support the need for thorough assessment of SHK candidates in terms of comorbidities, rather than exclusion solely based on age and functional dependence.

Simultaneous Heart-kidney Transplant With Planned Delayed Implantation of the Kidney Graft After Ex Vivo Perfusion.

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHK) is an established option for patients with severe heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Recent studies in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation demonstrate favorable outcomes achieved by delaying implantation of the kidney for over 24 h. This report describes a case series of consecutive patients listed for SHK who had planned delayed implantation of the kidney graft. This case series represents a retrospective analysis of SHK patients extracted from the transplant database at a single center. There were 7 patients who underwent SHK during the study period. In all cases, kidney grafts were maintained on hypothermic ex vivo pulsatile perfusion for delayed implantation (mean cold ischemia 53 h [range, 31-69]). The first 5 patients had 100% 1-y heart and kidney graft survival with good function. Patient 6 was unstable on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation post-heart transplant. The kidney was implanted at 69 h, and the patient died soon thereafter. Patient 7 was also unstable on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after heart transplant. The decision was made to implant the kidney into a backup kidney recipient. The heart transplant recipient subsequently died several days later, whereas the kidney was successfully transplanted in the alternate candidate. This case series highlights the potential utility of delayed kidney implantation in SHK patients. SHK with delayed renal transplant may provide an improved physiologic environment for renal transplant, which may result in improved early renal graft function. Delayed kidney transplant also provides the opportunity to transplant the kidney graft into an alternate candidate.

Intraoperative Considerations and Management of Simultaneous Heart Kidney Transplantation

Patients with heart failure are prone to developing non-cardiovascular comorbidities throughout the course of their disease. In particular, renal impairment is widespread in this patient population. The number of heart-kidney transplants has increased significantly over the past 2 decades. Currently, there is no consensus on therapies for patients who may need dual-organ transplants. The optimal timing of dual-organ transplantation is still debated. The options for the timing of dual-organ transplants are simultaneous, staged, or delayed. In this manuscript, the authors review their institutional experience with the intraoperative management of simultaneous heart-kidney transplants (SHKT) and discuss their outcomes, including cardiac primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and renal delayed graft function (DGF). A total of 31 patients were included in the SHKT study group. Data analysis revealed that no patients required newly initiated mechanical circulatory support (MCS) post-operatively, and 11 of 31 patients were placed on renal replacement therapy within 7 days postoperatively. Patients who did have post-operative MCS were intra-aortic balloon pumps that were present before the transplant and then removed on postoperative day 1. No patient required additional MCS after the transplant. The increasing number of patients having heart and kidney transplants demonstrates a need for developing a perioperative management protocol. The results of our experience validate our intraoperative management. None of the patients developed moderate or severe cardiac PGD, and 35% had renal DGF. With further studies, the eventual development of guidelines for patient selection and management for SHKT also may be possible.