Simultaneous Extraction Of DNA Research Articles

Results and lessons from dual extraction of DNA and RNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor tissues for a large Cancer epidemiologic study

BackgroundThe use of archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues has become a common practice in clinical and epidemiologic genetic research. Simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from FFPE tissues is appealing but can be practically challenging. Here we report our results and lessons learned from processing FFPE breast tumor tissues for a large epidemiologic study.MethodsQiagen AllPrep DNA/RNA FFPE kit was adapted for dual extraction using tissue punches or sections from breast tumor tissues. The yield was quantified using Qubit and fragmentation analysis by Agilent Bioanalyzer. A subset of the DNA samples were used for genome-wide DNA methylation assays and RNA samples for sequencing. The QC metrices and performance of the assays were analyzed with pre-analytical variables.ResultsA total of 1859 FFPE breast tumor tissues were processed. We found it critical to adjust proteinase K digestion time based on tissue volume to achieve balanced yields of DNA and RNA. Tissue punches taken from tumor-enriched regions provided the most reliable output. A median of 1475 ng DNA and 1786 ng RNA per sample was generated. The median DNA integrity number (DIN) was 3.8 and median DV200 for RNA was 33.2. Of 1294 DNA samples used in DNA methylation assays, 97% passed quality check by qPCR and 92% generated data deemed high quality. Of the 130 RNA samples with DV200 ≥ 20% used in RNA-sequencing, all but 5 generated usable transcriptomic data with a mapping rate ≥ 60%.ConclusionsDual DNA/RNA purification using Qiagen AllPrep FFPE extraction protocol is feasible for clinical and epidemiologic studies. We recommend tissue punches as a reliable source material and fine tuning of proteinase K digestion time based on tissue volume.ImpactOur protocol and recommendations may be adapted by future studies for successful extraction of archived tumor tissues.

One prep to catch them all: “2 in 1”, an efficient method for the simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from Grapevine tissues

Recent advances in our understanding of plant physiology and adaptation to the environment are tightly related to the development of ‘omics’ technologies such as metabolomics, transcriptomics, genomics and epigenomics that allow a more comprehensive view of the plant functioning. In this context, the ability to extract DNA and RNA from small amounts of plant material can be a limiting factor, worse in the case of non-model plants for which efficient nucleic extraction procedures are lacking. In the case of grapevine, extraction of high-quality DNA is typically limited by the high polyphenolic and polysaccharide contents of the different tissues. Here, we propose an adaptation of the method of Reid et al. (2006) that allows the simultaneous and efficient extraction of DNA and RNA from grapevine vegetative and berry tissues from in vitro grown grapevine plants and cells and from other plants. The protocol allows the extraction of high-quality RNA and DNA for standard molecular biology methods as well as for Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). It also works with a limited amount of plant material, such as young developing buds, and provides the means to analyse “omics” data from a single plant sample.

A common protocol for the simultaneous processing of multiple clinically relevant bacterial species for whole genome sequencing

Whole-genome sequencing is likely to become increasingly used by local clinical microbiology laboratories, where sequencing volume is low compared with national reference laboratories. Here, we describe a universal protocol for simultaneous DNA extraction and sequencing of numerous different bacterial species, allowing mixed species sequence runs to meet variable laboratory demand. We assembled test panels representing 20 clinically relevant bacterial species. The DNA extraction process used the QIAamp mini DNA kit, to which different combinations of reagents were added. Thereafter, a common protocol was used for library preparation and sequencing. The addition of lysostaphin, lysozyme or buffer ATL (a tissue lysis buffer) alone did not produce sufficient DNA for library preparation across the species tested. By contrast, lysozyme plus lysostaphin produced sufficient DNA across all 20 species. DNA from 15 of 20 species could be extracted from a 24-h culture plate, while the remainder required 48–72 h. The process demonstrated 100% reproducibility. Sequencing of the resulting DNA was used to recapitulate previous findings for species, outbreak detection, antimicrobial resistance gene detection and capsular type. This single protocol for simultaneous processing and sequencing of multiple bacterial species supports low volume and rapid turnaround time by local clinical microbiology laboratories.

Method for determination of varietal purity (typicality), hybridity, sterility of seed lots based on the establishment of the quantitative ratio of alleles of DNA markers

Purpose. To develop a conceptually new method for determination of varietal purity (typicality), hybridity, steri­lity of seed lots. Methods of molecular biology (genomic DNA extraction, PCR with SSR markers application, capillary electrophoresis), genetic, statistical, mathematical analysis. Results. New method for determining the varietal qualities of seed lot was developed that consists of the following steps: simultaneous DNA extraction from a representative sample of aggregated seeds; PCR and further analysis of the amplification products by determination of the qualitative and quantitative composition of SSR-markers’ alleles; calculation of values of varietal seed lot quality using experimentally derived allele ratios. Conclusions. The developed method for determining varietal qualities of seed lots allows to reduce significantly the consumption of materials, time and labor during the analysis. Consistent qualification and quantification of alleles in the total sample of a seed lot is a conceptually new approach to establish varietal purity (typicality), hybridity, sterility.

Transparent DNA/RNA Co-extraction Workflow Protocol Suitable for Inhibitor-Rich Environmental Samples That Focuses on Complete DNA Removal for Transcriptomic Analyses.

Adequate comparisons of DNA and cDNA libraries from complex environments require methods for co-extraction of DNA and RNA due to the inherent heterogeneity of such samples, or risk bias caused by variations in lysis and extraction efficiencies. Still, there are few methods and kits allowing simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from the same sample, and the existing ones generally require optimization. The proprietary nature of kit components, however, makes modifications of individual steps in the manufacturer’s recommended procedure difficult. Surprisingly, enzymatic treatments are often performed before purification procedures are complete, which we have identified here as a major problem when seeking efficient genomic DNA removal from RNA extracts. Here, we tested several DNA/RNA co-extraction commercial kits on inhibitor-rich soils, and compared them to a commonly used phenol-chloroform co-extraction method. Since none of the kits/methods co-extracted high-quality nucleic acid material, we optimized the extraction workflow by introducing small but important improvements. In particular, we illustrate the need for extensive purification prior to all enzymatic procedures, with special focus on the DNase digestion step in RNA extraction. These adjustments led to the removal of enzymatic inhibition in RNA extracts and made it possible to reduce genomic DNA to below detectable levels as determined by quantitative PCR. Notably, we confirmed that DNase digestion may not be uniform in replicate extraction reactions, thus the analysis of “representative samples” is insufficient. The modular nature of our workflow protocol allows optimization of individual steps. It also increases focus on additional purification procedures prior to enzymatic processes, in particular DNases, yielding genomic DNA-free RNA extracts suitable for metatranscriptomic analysis.

Simultaneous extraction of DNA and total RNA from varying specimen types to enhance tissue utilization for molecular analysis.

e23209Background: The isolation of both genomic DNA (gDNA) and total RNA (RNA) from tissues of various types is critical for comprehensive molecular profiling, especially as submitted specimens bec...

Simultaneous Extraction of DNA and RNA from Animal Cells by a Modified Laemmli Buffer

Simultaneous Extraction of DNA and RNA from Animal Cells by a Modified Laemmli Buffer

Abstract 3389: Determining optimal conditions for collection and processing of metastatic liver biopsies collected for a multicenter, prospective study to identify biomarkers of clinical resistance to first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

Abstract Introduction: The biomarker discovery process requires patient tissue samples from which histology is verified and high-quality genomic material is isolated. Several methods have been developed to either preserve tissue morphology or extract sufficient quality and quantity of RNA and DNA for downstream discovery efforts. As clinical trials incorporate patient biopsies for biomarker discovery or validation, it is becoming increasingly important to ensure quality material and identify methods that allow for preservation of morphology and stabilization of molecular content concurrently. We assessed, in liver needle-core biopsies, different sampling, fixation, and genomic isolation methods to maintain morphology and obtain high-quality genomic material for a multi-center prospective study to identify biomarkers of clinical resistance to first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Four sampling methods (snap freezing, RNAlater, frozen RNAlater, formalin), two different fixation protocols for histological studies (10% formalin, RNAlater followed by OCT embedding and freezing) and two RNA isolation procedures (Triazol and AllprepDNA/RNA isolation) were evaluated. Results: Keeping in mind site feasibility, we report that the ideal condition to both preserve morphology and obtain high-quality genomic material of patient liver biopsy samples is to collect biopsies in RNAlater for shipping to a Central Pathology core, followed by washing with cold PBS (on dry ice) to permit proper RNA preservation during OCT embedding and cryostat sectioning for histological verification. Simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from the same biopsy core yields nucleic acids of optimal concentration and quality for downstream genomic applications. Conclusion: The collection of biospecimens using pre-determined protocol-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) is essential to control for pre-analytical variability inherent to multicenter trials. Furthermore, histological control of percent tumor cells in each biopsy is absolutely necessary to ensure optimal representation of tumor (>70%) in the specimen. The above conditions were used in the multicenter Q-CROC-01 study (NCT00984048), where three needle core biopsies are collected from liver metastases of patients with colorectal cancer. One biopsy is collected in formalin and is set aside for downstream immunohistochemistry experiments. Two biopsies are collected in RNAlater and verified for histology. If they pass quality control, both DNA and RNA are isolated concurrently and sent to discovery platforms (DNA: array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), methylation profiles, RNA: gene expression profiles, RT-PCR, microRNA profiles, alternative splicing profiles). Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3389. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3389

Improved protocol for the simultaneous extraction and column-based separation of DNA and RNA from different soils

We developed an improved protocol, allowing the simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from soil using phenol-chloroform with subsequent column-based separation of DNA and RNA (PCS). We compared this new approach with the well established protocol published by Griffiths et al. (2000), where DNA and RNA are separated by selective enzymatic digestions and two commercial kits used for DNA or RNA extraction, respectively, using four different agricultural soils. We compared yield and purity of the nucleic acids as well as abundance and diversity profiles of the soil bacterial communities targeting the nosZ gene via quantitative real-time PCR and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism on DNA and RNA level. The newly developed protocol provided purer nucleic acid extracts compared to the used kit-based protocols. All protocols were suitable for DNA- and RNA-based gene quantification, however high variations between replicates were obtained for RNA samples using the original Griffiths protocol. Diversity patterns of nosZ were highly influenced by the extraction protocol used both on the DNA and RNA level. Finally, our data showed that the new protocol allows a simultaneous and reproducible extraction and separation of DNA and RNA, which were suitable for reliable analyses of gene and transcript copy numbers and diversity pattern.

Evaluation of a new experimental kit for the extraction of DNA from bones and teeth using a non-powder method

An experimental DNA extraction kit (new kit) was recently developed to extract DNA from degraded skeletal remains without the need for powdering the samples. We compared the utility of the new kit with the conventional phenol/chloroform method using real-time quantitative PCR and multiplex STR analysis. The new kit yielded large amounts of DNA from a compact bone fragment compared with the conventional phenol/chloroform method. We were able to extract sufficient DNA for STR analysis from 75% (3 of 4) and 60% (3 of 5) of the un-powdered tooth and bone samples, respectively, using the new kit. We were able to perform mini-STR analysis of the remaining samples using DNA extracted with the new kit. Furthermore, we successfully performed mitochondrial DNA sequencing of every sample. The new kit simplifies the DNA extraction procedure as it does not require powdering samples. Decreasing the number of procedural steps in DNA extraction will be beneficial in controlling DNA contamination in laboratories. Our results suggest that the new kit may be used for the simple, simultaneous extraction of DNA from multiple samples.

Isolation and Solubilization of Proteins After TRI zol ® Extraction of RNA and DNA from Patient Material Following Prolonged Storage

A systems approach is being applied in many areas of the biological sciences, particularly in cancer research. The coordinated, simultaneous extraction of DNA, RNA, and proteins from a single sample is crucial for accurate correlations between genomic aberrations and their consequences on the transcriptome and proteome. We present an approach to extract and completely solubilize up to 98% of the total protein recovered from archived samples following TRIzoL isolation of RNA and DNA. We also demonstrate using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and Western blot analysis that the proteins, representing both a wide molecular weight range and some posttranslational modifications, such as protein phosphorylation, remain stable in phenol-ethanol for up to 3 years at -20 degrees C.

The extraction of fungal DNA from multiple large soil samples

A commercial electric paint shaker was utilized to enable the simultaneous extraction of DNA from multiple large soil samples. A bead homogenization procedure was used to extract DNA from soil samples added to tubes. Soils infested with chlamydospores of the phytopathogenic fungus Cylindrocarpon destructans were used to evaluate the procedure. Glass beads and zirconium-oxide beads of various diameters were compared for their ability to extract DNA and reduce fungal colony-forming units (CFU) on agar media after shaking treatments. Total extracted DNA was measured using fluorometry, and DNA quality was assessed using gel electrophoresis. Twenty minutes of shaking with 1-mm-diameter zirconium-oxide beads provided the highest recovery of DNA from soil and resulted in 98% reduction of colony forming units, compared with nonshaken soil. Components of the extraction solution (calcium chloride, proteinase K, sodium dodecyl sulfate) were evaluated for their effects on DNA yield and on amplification by polymerase chain reaction. Minimum amounts of these materials provided maximum yield, but their impacts on amplification by polymerase chain reaction were dependent upon the primer set used. Amplification of extracts, using the optimized extraction procedure, successfully detected C. destructans in naturally infested soil. Total DNA yields resulting from this procedure were at least as high as those obtained with commercial extraction kits

Killing two birds with one stone: simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from activated sludge biomass

DNA and RNA are usually extracted from activated sludge samples using two separate methods developed for soil and sediment samples. However, activated sludge differs from soil and sediment in at least three aspects: high biomass density, low humic acid content, and the presence of bacterial aggregate flocs. Taking these characteristics into consideration, we developed a simple and rapid method allowing simultaneous DNA and RNA extraction from activated sludge samples. This method combines (i) mini-bead beating, which is most efficient in breaking bacterial aggregate flocs and cells, (ii) protection of RNA with diethyl pyrocarbonate, and (iii) precipitation of impurities with ammonium acetate. Phenol/chloroform extraction and column purification are not necessary. The resulting DNA and RNA are suitable for PCR and reverse transcriptase - PCR, respectively. The efficiencies of cell lysis and nucleic acid recovery were high enough to permit detection by PCR of 102cells/mL of mixed liquor. By simultaneously extracting both DNA and RNA from a single sample, this method eliminates variability in cell lysis between extraction of DNA and RNA using two different methods. This extraction method is rapid, and within 1 h, one person can process four or more samples. This simple method makes it easier to analyze a large number of activated sludge samples.Key words: activated sludge, DNA, extraction, PCR, RNA.

Killing two birds with one stone: simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from activated sludge biomass

Killing two birds with one stone: simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from activated sludge biomass

Simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from nuclease-rich pathogenic protozoan Trichomonas vaginalis.

Simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from nuclease-rich pathogenic protozoan Trichomonas vaginalis.

Transcriptional differences of the human papillomavirus type 16 genome between precancerous lesions and invasive carcinomas

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) genome DNA and its transcripts in biopsied cervical neoplasias were analyzed by simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from one biopsied sample. Southern blot analysis revealed that 5 of 20 cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs) contained HPV16 DNAs existing primarily as episomes and two of seven invasive carcinomas harbored HPV16 genome sequences integrated into the host DNA. Northern (RNA) blot analysis showed that the HPV16 genome sequences were transcriptionally active in the five CINs, as well as in the two invasive carcinomas. The pattern of HPV16-specific transcripts in the CINs was uniform, and the major transcripts were 4.2, 2.2, 1.6, and 1.4 kilobases in size. However, the pattern of HPV16-specific transcripts in the invasive carcinomas was variable and different from that in CINs, suggesting that the alteration of transcriptional pattern might play a key role in the development of malignancy.