Simultaneous Deep Brain Stimulation Research Articles

Enhancing Attentional Performance in Parkinson's Disease: The Impact of Combined Deep Brain Stimulation of the Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata and the Subthalamic Nucleus

ObjectiveThe concomitant stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and the substantia nigra pars reticulata is a promising approach to improve treatment of refractory axial symptoms in Parkinson's disease. While dual stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and the substantia nigra pars reticulata has previously shown beneficial effects on gait, the role of the substantia nigra, a crucial component of the basal ganglia circuitry, in cognitive functions such as attention and executive control remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the impact of selective substantia nigra pars reticulata stimulation on attentional performance in patients receiving standard deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. MethodsTwelve patients with bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation underwent computerized assessment of attention using a simple reaction time task. Reaction times were assessed under standard stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus versus simultaneous stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and the substantia nigra pars reticulata. ResultsThe results revealed a significant improvement in reaction times during the simple reaction time task when patients received dual stimulation compared to standard stimulation. ConclusionsOur findings provide further evidence for the pivotal role of the substantia nigra pars reticulata in cognitive functions such as attention. Despite the limitations of the study, including a small sample size, our results suggest potential benefits of simultaneous deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and the substantia nigra pars reticulata on attentional performance in patients with Parkinson's disease. Further research with larger cohorts is warranted to confirm these findings and better understand the underlying mechanisms.

Anterior thalamic deep brain stimulation in epilepsy patients refractory to vagus nerve stimulation: A single center observational study.

Anterior thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a palliative treatment that may be considered in patients with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) that fail treatment with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). Combining VNS and DBS treatment is a therapeutic approach rarely reported. This single center observational study aims to describe response to DBS treatment in 11 epilepsy patients resistant to medications and VNS. Patients either had inactivated VNS (DBS only) or were treated with simultaneous DBS and VNS (DBS-VNS). Focal impaired awareness (FIA) and most disabling seizure rates were examined pre-DBS implantation, 3months following implantation, and last follow up. Overall, a decrease in FIA (47.0±30.7%, p=0.02) and most disabling seizure rate (54.8±34.2%, p=0.03) was seen at last follow-up (average follow-up 28.5±13.5months). Eight of 11 patients were DBS responders (most disabling seizure rate reduction above 50%). No difference in seizure control was found between seven DBS only and four DBS-VNS patients. Our results argue that patients who have failed antiseizure medication and VNS therapies, could benefit from better seizure control if treated with adjunctive DBS. Larger prospective studies are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of combined neurostimulation treatments in DRE.

Full activation pattern mapping by simultaneous deep brain stimulation and fMRI with graphene fiber electrodes

Full activation pattern mapping by simultaneous deep brain stimulation and fMRI with graphene fiber electrodes

Anesthetic Management in Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation for X-linked Dystonia Parkinsonism: Early Single Institution Experience from the Philippines

X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (XDP) is a rare, adult-onset, progressive, hereditary neurological movement disorder primarily affecting Filipino men with maternal families from Panay province of the Philippines. Medical treatment modalities currently being used have offered temporary symptomatic relief. Surgical management in the form of bilateral globus pallidi internae (Gpi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown promising results and is increasingly being performed in advanced centers, as reported in international literature. Presented herein is the local experience of seven (7) retrospectively reviewed cases from February 2018 to February 2019 in a tertiary center in the Philippines with a particular focus on anesthetic management. All patients were male, from Panay, and presented with progressive dystonia and parkinsonism. All patients underwent planned bilateral, simultaneous DBS electrode, and implantable pulse generator (IPG) placement performed by a multidisciplinary team. Anesthetic management consisted of Bispectral Index (BIS) guided conscious sedation with low dose propofol and remifentanil infusions with a complete scalp nerve block (SB) at the start of the procedure then shifted to awake monitored anesthesia care during electrode placement, microelectrode recording (MER) and macro stimulation testing. All were put under general anesthesia with a supraglottic airway device during the placement of the internal pulse generator (IPG) in the infraclavicular area. All seven patients had successful localization, and insertion of the DBS electrode and discharged improved. The anesthetic management of the DBS used in these cases warrants further investigation and may lead to standardization of future practice.

Full activation pattern mapping by simultaneous deep brain stimulation and fMRI with graphene fiber electrodes

Simultaneous deep brain stimulation (DBS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) constitutes a powerful tool for elucidating brain functional connectivity, and exploring neuromodulatory mechanisms of DBS therapies. Previous DBS-fMRI studies could not provide full activation pattern maps due to poor MRI compatibility of the DBS electrodes, which caused obstruction of large brain areas on MRI scans. Here, we fabricate graphene fiber (GF) electrodes with high charge-injection-capacity and little-to-no MRI artifact at 9.4T. DBS-fMRI with GF electrodes at the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinsonian rats reveal robust blood-oxygenation-level-dependent responses along the basal ganglia-thalamocortical network in a frequency-dependent manner, with responses from some regions not previously detectable. This full map indicates that STN-DBS modulates both motor and non-motor pathways, possibly through orthodromic and antidromic signal propagation. With the capability for full, unbiased activation pattern mapping, DBS-fMRI using GF electrodes can provide important insights into DBS therapeutic mechanisms in various neurological disorders.

Combined Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus and Ventral Intermediate Thalamic Nucleus in Tremor-Dominant Parkinson’s Disease Using a Parietal Approach

Despite its efficacy in tremor-suppression, the ventral intermediate thalamic (VIM) nucleus has largely been neglected in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (tdPD). The employment of a parietal approach, however, allows stimulation of VIM and subthalamic nucleus (STN) using one trajectory only and thus constitutes a promising alternative to existing strategies. In the present study, we investigate safety and efficacy of combined lead implantation and stimulation of STN and VIM using a parietal approach. Retrospective analysis of five patients with tdPD was performed who underwent DBS using a parietal approach. Changes in symptom severity, disease-specific health-related quality of life and l-dopa equivalent doses (LED) were evaluated over a total time course of 12 months. DBS within both targets yielded significant improvement of parkinsonian symptoms (median: 40.0%, p = 0.04) in the first 6 months of continuous stimulation and remained stable thereafter (median improvement at 12 months: 43.2%, p = 0.07). Sustained improvement of tremor (median at 6 months: 100.0%, p = 0.04; median at 12 months 83.3%, p = 0.04) and quality of life scores (median at 6 months: 29.8%, p = 0.04; median at 12 months: 32.6%, p = 0.04) was noted throughout the follow-up period. No significant change of LEDs was observed by the end of follow-up (median decrease: 2.2%, p = 0.89). Simultaneous DBS of VIM and STN using one trajectory is safe, yielding good control of parkinsonian tremors. Further studies, however, are necessary to determine whether a parietal trajectory affords better control over tremor symptoms than established strategies and hence justifies the potential risks associated with the alternative approach.

Modulation of specific components of sleep disturbances by simultaneous subthalamic and nigral stimulation in Parkinson's disease

ObjectiveTo compare the effect of simultaneous deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and substantia nigra pars reticulata (STN+SNr-DBS) to conventional subthalamic stimulation (STN-DBS) on sleep quality in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. MethodsThe study was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial to compare the effect of STN-DBS vs. combined STN+SNr-DBS on subjective measures of sleep quality. Fifteen PD patients (2 female, age 62.5 ± 6.7 years) suffering from moderate idiopathic PD (disease duration: 12.0 ± 5.0 years, Hoehn & Yahr stage: 2.2 ± 0.4 in the MED-ON & STN-DBS-ON condition, Hoehn & Yahr stage: 2.6 ± 0.8 in the MED-OFF condition preoperatively) participated in the study. Sleep quality was evaluated in both stimulation conditions using the PDSS-2 score as a self-rating questionnaire covering several aspects of sleep disturbances. ResultsPD patients showed mild-moderate sleep disturbances (STN-DBS: PDSS-2 score 17.0 ± 11.0; STN+SNr-DBS: 14.7 ± 9.5) with slight but not significant differences between both stimulation conditions. Considering the different subitems of the PDSS-2, combined STN+SNr stimulation was superior to conventional STN stimulation in improving restless legs symptoms (RLS) at night (STN-DBS = 1.9 ± 2.7 STN+SNr-DBS = 1.0 ± 1.8; W = −2.06, p = 0.039) and immobility at night (STN-DBS = 1.5 ± 1.4 STN+SNr-DBS = 0.6 ± 0.8; W = −2.041, p = 0.041). ConclusionThis study demonstrates the safety of STN+SNr-DBS compared to conventional STN-DBS on sleep in general with potential beneficial input on RLS symptoms and akinesia at night.

Long-term results after deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens and the anterior limb of the internal capsule for preventing heroin relapse: An open-label pilot study

BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is currently used to treat addiction, with the nucleus accumbens (NAc) as one promising target. The anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC) is also a potential target, as it carries fiber tracts connecting the mesocorticolimbic circuits that are crucially involved in several psychiatric disorders, including addiction. Stimulating the NAc and ALIC simultaneously may have a synergistic effect against addiction. MethodsEight patients with a long history of heroin use and multiple relapses, despite optimal conventional treatments, were enrolled. Customized electrodes were implanted through the ALIC into the NAc, and deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment began two weeks after surgery. The patients were followed for at least 24 months. The duration of drug-free time, severity of drug cravings, psychometric evaluations, and PET studies of glucose metabolism before and after DBS were conducted. All adverse events were recorded. ResultsWith DBS, five patients were abstinent for more than three years, two relapsed after abstaining for six months, and one was lost of follow-up at three months. The degree of cravings for drug use after DBS was reduced if the patients remained abstinent (p < 0.001). Simultaneous DBS of the NAc and ALIC also improved the quality of life, alleviated psychiatric symptoms, and increased glucose metabolism in addiction-related brain regions. Moreover, stimulation-related adverse events were few and reversible. ConclusionsSimultaneous DBS of the NAc and ALIC appears to be safe, with few side effects, and may prevent long-term heroin relapse after detoxification in certain patients. (This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01274988).

Spontaneous sensorimotor cortical activity is suppressed by deep brain stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease

Advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by an excessive oscillatory beta band activity in the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of STN alleviates motor symptoms in PD and suppresses the STN beta band activity. The effect of DBS on cortical sensorimotor activity is more ambiguous; both increases and decreases of beta band activity have been reported. Non-invasive studies with simultaneous DBS are problematic due to DBS-induced artifacts. We recorded magnetoencephalography (MEG) from 16 advanced PD patients with and without STN DBS during rest and wrist extension. The strong magnetic artifacts related to stimulation were removed by temporal signal space separation. MEG oscillatory activity at 5–25 Hz was suppressed during DBS in a widespread frontoparietal region, including the sensorimotor cortex identified by the cortico-muscular coherence. The strength of suppression did not correlate with clinical improvement. Our results indicate that alpha and beta band oscillations are suppressed at the frontoparietal cortex by STN DBS in PD.

Functional circuit mapping of striatal output nuclei using simultaneous deep brain stimulation and fMRI

The substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) and external globus pallidus (GPe) constitute the two major output targets of the rodent striatum. Both the SNr and GPe converge upon thalamic relay nuclei (directly or indirectly, respectively), and are traditionally modeled as functionally antagonistic relay inputs. However, recent anatomical and functional studies have identified unanticipated circuit connectivity in both the SNr and GPe, demonstrating their potential as far more than relay nuclei. In the present study, we employed simultaneous deep brain stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging (DBS-fMRI) with cerebral blood volume (CBV) measurements to functionally and unbiasedly map the circuit- and network level connectivity of the SNr and GPe. Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with a custom-made MR-compatible stimulating electrode in the right SNr (n=6) or GPe (n=7). SNr- and GPe-DBS, conducted across a wide range of stimulation frequencies, revealed a number of surprising evoked responses, including unexpected CBV decreases within the striatum during DBS at either target, as well as GPe-DBS-evoked positive modulation of frontal cortex. Functional connectivity MRI revealed global modulation of neural networks during DBS at either target, sensitive to stimulation frequency and readily reversed following cessation of stimulation. This work thus contributes to a growing literature demonstrating extensive and unanticipated functional connectivity among basal ganglia nuclei.

Comparison of Bilateral vs. Staged Unilateral Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson’s Disease in Patients Under 70 Years of Age

The most popular surgical method for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is simultaneous bilateral DBS. However, some centers conduct a staged unilateral approach advocating that reduced continuous intraoperative time reduces postoperative complications, thus justifying the cost of a second operative session. To test these assumptions, we performed a retrospective analysis of the Truven Health MarketScan® Database. Using the MarketScan Database, we retrospectively analyzed patients that underwent simultaneous bilateral or staged unilateral DBS between 2000 and 2009. The main outcome measures were 90-day postoperative complication rates, number of reprogramming hours one year following procedure, and annualized healthcare cost. The outcome measures were compared between cohorts using multivariate regressions controlling for appropriate covariates. A total of 713 patients that underwent DBS between 2000 and 2009 met inclusion criteria for the study. Of these patients, 556 underwent simultaneous bilateral DBS and 157 received staged unilateral DBS. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in the rate of infection (simultaneous: 4.3% vs. staged: 7.0%; p = 0.178), pneumonia (3.1% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.283), hemorrhage (2.9% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.844), pulmonary embolism (0.5% vs. 1.3%), and device-related complications (0.5% vs. 0.0%). Patients in the staged cohort had a higher rate of lead revision in 90 days (3.2% vs. 12.7%; RR = 3.07; p < 0.001). The staged cohort had a higher mean (SD) number of reprogramming hours within one year of procedure (6.0 ± 5.7 vs. 7.8 ± 8.1; RR = 1.17; p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between the mean (SD) annualized payments between the cohorts ($86,100 ± $94,700 vs. $102,100 ± $121,500; p = 0.148). Our study did not find a significant difference between 90-day postoperative complication rates or annualized cost between the staged and simultaneous cohorts. Thus, we believe that it is important to consider other factors when deciding between the staged and simultaneous DBS. Such factors include patient convenience and the laterality of symptoms.

Functional MRI during Hippocampal Deep Brain Stimulation in the Healthy Rat Brain.

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment for neurological and psychiatric disorders. The mechanism of action and the effects of electrical fields administered to the brain by means of an electrode remain to be elucidated. The effects of DBS have been investigated primarily by electrophysiological and neurochemical studies, which lack the ability to investigate DBS-related responses on a whole-brain scale. Visualization of whole-brain effects of DBS requires functional imaging techniques such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), which reflects changes in blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) responses throughout the entire brain volume. In order to visualize BOLD responses induced by DBS, we have developed an MRI-compatible electrode and an acquisition protocol to perform DBS during BOLD fMRI. In this study, we investigate whether DBS during fMRI is valuable to study local and whole-brain effects of hippocampal DBS and to investigate the changes induced by different stimulation intensities. Seven rats were stereotactically implanted with a custom-made MRI-compatible DBS-electrode in the right hippocampus. High frequency Poisson distributed stimulation was applied using a block-design paradigm. Data were processed by means of Independent Component Analysis. Clusters were considered significant when p-values were <0.05 after correction for multiple comparisons. Our data indicate that real-time hippocampal DBS evokes a bilateral BOLD response in hippocampal and other mesolimbic structures, depending on the applied stimulation intensity. We conclude that simultaneous DBS and fMRI can be used to detect local and whole-brain responses to circuit activation with different stimulation intensities, making this technique potentially powerful for exploration of cerebral changes in response to DBS for both preclinical and clinical DBS.

Simultaneous deep brain stimulation and functional MRI of the healthy rat brain

Simultaneous deep brain stimulation and functional MRI of the healthy rat brain

Deep Brain Stimulation with Simultaneous fMRI in Rodents

In order to visualize the global and downstream neuronal responses to deep brain stimulation (DBS) at various targets, we have developed a protocol for using blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to image rodents with simultaneous DBS. DBS fMRI presents a number of technical challenges, including accuracy of electrode implantation, MR artifacts created by the electrode, choice of anesthesia and paralytic to minimize any neuronal effects while simultaneously eliminating animal motion, and maintenance of physiological parameters, deviation from which can confound the BOLD signal. Our laboratory has developed a set of procedures that are capable of overcoming most of these possible issues. For electrical stimulation, a homemade tungsten bipolar microelectrode is used, inserted stereotactically at the stimulation site in the anesthetized subject. In preparation for imaging, rodents are fixed on a plastic headpiece and transferred to the magnet bore. For sedation and paralysis during scanning, a cocktail of dexmedetomidine and pancuronium is continuously infused, along with a minimal dose of isoflurane; this preparation minimizes the BOLD ceiling effect of volatile anesthetics. In this example experiment, stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) produces BOLD responses which are observed primarily in ipsilateral cortical regions, centered in motor cortex. Simultaneous DBS and fMRI allows the unambiguous modulation of neural circuits dependent on stimulation location and stimulation parameters, and permits observation of neuronal modulations free of regional bias. This technique may be used to explore the downstream effects of modulating neural circuitry at nearly any brain region, with implications for both experimental and clinical DBS.

Influence of basal ganglia on upper limb locomotor synergies. Evidence from deep brain stimulation and L-DOPA treatment in Parkinson's disease

Clinical evidence of impaired arm swing while walking in patients with Parkinson's disease suggests that basal ganglia and related systems play an important part in the control of upper limb locomotor automatism. To gain more information on this supraspinal influence, we measured arm and thigh kinematics during walking in 10 Parkinson's disease patients, under four conditions: (i) baseline (no treatment), (ii) therapeutic stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), (iii)L-DOPA medication and (iv) combined STN stimulation and L-DOPA. Ten age-matched controls provided reference data. Under baseline conditions the range of patients' arm motion was severely restricted, with no correlation with the excursion of the thigh. In addition, the arm swing was abnormally coupled in time with oscillation of the ipsilateral thigh. STN stimulation significantly increased the gait speed and improved the spatio-temporal parameters of arm and thigh motion. The kinematic changes as a function of gait speed changes, however, were significantly smaller for the upper than the lower limb, in contrast to healthy controls. Arm motion was also less responsive after L-DOPA. Simultaneous deep brain stimulation and L-DOPA had additive effects on thigh motion, but not on arm motion and arm-thigh coupling. The evidence that locomotor automatisms of the upper and lower limbs display uncorrelated impairment upon dysfunction of the basal ganglia, as well as different susceptibility to electrophysiological and pharmacological interventions, points to the presence of heterogeneously distributed, possibly partially independent, supraspinal control channels, whereby STN and dopaminergic systems have relatively weaker influence on the executive structures involved in the arm swing and preferential action on those for lower limb movements. These findings might be considered in the light of phylogenetic changes in supraspinal control of limb motion related to primate bipedalism.

Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus compared with the globus pallidus internus in patients with Parkinson disease.

The authors compared the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the globus pallidus internus (GPi) with those in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) in whom electrodes had been bilaterally implanted in both targets. Eight of 14 patients with advanced PD in whom electrodes had been implanted bilaterally in both the GPi and STN for DBS were selected on the basis of optimal DBS effects and were studied 2 months postsurgery in off- and on-stimulus conditions and after at least 1 month of pharmacological withdrawal. Subcutaneous administration of an apomorphine test dose (0.04 mg/kg) was also performed in both conditions. Compared with the off status, the results showed less reduction in the Unified PD Rating Scale Section III scores during DBS in the GPi (43.1%) than during DBS of the STN (54.5%) or DBS of both the STN and GPi (57.1%). The difference between the effects of DBS in the GPi compared with that in the STN or simultaneous DBS was statistically significant (p < 0.01). In contrast, no statistical difference was found between DBS in the STN and simultaneous DBS in the STN and GPi (p < 0.9). The improvement induced by adding apomorphine administration to DBS was similar in all three stimulus modalities. The abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs) induced by apomorphine were almost abolished by DBS of the GPi, but were not affected by stimulation of the STN. The simultaneous stimulation of STN and GPi produced both antiparkinsonian and anti-AIM effects. The improvement of parkinsonian symptoms during stimulation of the GPi, STN, and both nuclei simultaneously may indicate a similar DBS mechanism for both nuclei in inducing antiparkinsonian effects, although STN is more effective. The antidyskinetic effects produced only by DBS of the GPi, with or without STN, may indicate different mechanisms for the antidyskinetic and antiparkinsonian activity related to DBS of the GPi or an additional mechanism in the GPi. These findings indicate that implantation of double electrodes for DBS should not be proposed as a routine procedure, but could be considered as a possible subsequent choice if electrode implantation for DBS of the STN does not control AIMs.