Simulated Y-site Administration Research Articles

Incompatibility of the short-acting benzodiazepine remimazolam with common perioperative medication

BackgroundRemimazolam is a relatively new benzodiazepine with growing use in procedural sedation and general anaesthesia. Initiated by case reports, the physical incompatibility of remimazolam with ringer’s acetated and ringer’s lactated solution has been reported. More recently, remifentanil, fentanyl, rocuronium, vecuronium, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam, have been investigated and suggested safe for coadministration with remimazolam. Apart from case reports, incompatibility for other frequently used drugs remains unknown.MethodsSixty-five drugs and intravenous fluids were tested for possible precipitation with remimazolam in a simulated y-site administration. Equal volumes of the test drug were injected into the remimazolam solution, examined and photo documented at 1, 15, 30 and 60 min after mixture. Examination was taken by two independent investigators. pH was measured before, and 60 min after mixing the drugs.ResultsSeventeen (26.15%) drugs or fluids showed precipitation, 47 (72.31%) did not show any sign of interaction. Propofol could not be assessed, because of the turbidity of the substance itself. Precipitation occurred immediately and remained stable in all timestamps. The incompatible drug-remimazolam-mixtures had a median pH of 7.15 (6.67, 8.01), the non-precipitating mixtures a median pH of 4.75 (3.8, 5.6). The pH-values of both groups were significantly different (Mann-Whitney-U-test; p < .00001). There is an increasing risk for precipitation with more basic baseline pH-levels of the tested drug. No interaction was seen in baseline pH below 5.ConclusionsRemimazolam (Byfavo®) is incompatible with ampicillin/ sulbactam, calcium gluconate, clindamycin, dexamethasone, dimenhydrinate, an 148mval/l electrolyte - glucose 1% solution (E148G1®), furosemide, a 4% gelatine volume expander (gelafundin®), heparin sodium, insulin, meropenem, sodium bicarbonate 8.4%, prednisolone, the crystalloid infusions jonosteril® and sterofundin®, thiopental and tranexamic acid. The results strongly affirm remimazolam’s safety requirements: A separate line for remimazolam and an approved compatible baseline infusion is mandatory and an alternative way to administer bolus medication is required.

Physicochemical Compatibility of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam with Parenteral Nutrition.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (CT) is used for the treatment of complicated infections and for multidrug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteria. In certain cases, simultaneous administration of CT and parenteral nutrition (PN) may be required, but compatibility of Y-site co-administration is unknown. The aim of this study was to analyse the physicochemical compatibility of CT Y-site administered with PN. We evaluated a protocolized PN approach for critical patients in our center. We studied both bolus infusion (2 g ceftolozane/1 g tazobactam in 1 h) and continuous infusion (CI) (6 g ceftolozane/3 g tazobactam) strategies. Samples were visually observed against light, microscopically inspected, and pH was analysed using a pH meter. The mean lipid droplet diameter (MDD) was determined via dynamic light scattering. CT concentration was quantified using HPLC-HRMS. No alterations were observed through visual or microscopic inspection. Changes in pH were ≤0.2, and changes in osmolarity were less than 5%. MDD remained below 500 nm (284.5 ± 2.1 for bolus CT and 286.8 ± 7.5 for CI CT). CT concentrations at t = 0 h and t = 24 h remained within prespecified parameters in both infusion strategies. CT is physiochemically compatible with PN during simulated Y-site administration at the tested concentration and infusion rates.

Physical compatibility of Xuebijing injection with 53 intravenous drugs during simulated Y-site administration.

Xuebijing injection (XBJ) is a commonly used herbal medicine injection in China. However, the physical compatibility of XBJ with other intravenous drugs remains unclear. The purpose of this research is to evaluate physical compatibility of Xuebijing injection (XBJ) with 53 intravenous drugs (including 31 Chinese medicine injections and 22 chemicals) during simulated Y-site administration. Y-site administration was simulated in vitro by admixing 0.33 ml/ml XBJ with an equal volume of other diluted 53 intravenous drugs, respectively. Physical compatibility including visual inspection, Tyndall beam, particle limits, turbidity, pH, chromacity value, spectroscopic absorption of 550 nm and 420 nm (A550 nm and A420 nm) were observed and assessed at 0, 1, 2, and 4 h. Physical compatibility was defined as all solutions with no color changes, no gas evolution, particulate formation and no Tyndall beam within 4 hours, turbidity changes <0.5 nephelometric turbidity unit (NTU) compared to 0 h, particle limits allowed by the Chinese Pharmacopoeia (Ch.P) 2020 edition, pH changes <10% compared to 0, chromacity value changes <200 compared to 0 h, or photometrical changes of A420 nm <0.0400 or A550 nm <0.0100 compared to 0 h. XBJ was physically incompatible with 27 of the 53 intravenous drugs tested, 26 were compatible with XBJ for 4 h. XBJ should not be simultaneously co-administered with 27 of the 53 intravenous drugs during simulated Y-site. If coadministration was inevitable, flushing tube with NS or D5W before and after infusion of XBJ was needed. Assessment included visual inspection, Tyndall beam, turbidity measurement, particle counts, pH measurement, chromacity value measurement and absorption of A550 nm were proved to be valid and robust for the quality control of infusion and compatibility of Chinese herbal injection.

Physical compatibility of colistin with analgesics during simulated Y-site administration.

Special consideration is needed when intravenous drugs are administered simultaneously using a Y-site connector. This study aimed to investigate the physical compatibility of colistin with 6 analgesics at concentrations commonly used in clinical practice. A pharmaceutical preparation of colistin was dissolved according to the manufacturer's instructions and diluted to a concentration of 1.5 mg/mL or 0.67 mg/mL (of colistin base). Simulated administration via Y-site infusion set was performed by mixing 5 mL of colistin solution with an equal volume of a solution of one of 6 intravenous analgesics. Infusion solutions of ibuprofen, ketoprofen, metamizole sodium, morphine sulfate, paracetamol, and tramadol hydrochloride were studied. For each analgesic tested, concentrates for injection were diluted with 2 solvents, resulting in 11 different combinations with each concentration of the colistin solution. The mixtures were visually inspected, and their turbidity was measured directly after mixing and at 3 consecutive time points (30, 60, and 120 minutes). Additionally, the pH of the mixtures was measured after 120 minutes and compared with the pH of the analgesic and the colistin solutions. During visual inspection with the unaided eye, no precipitate formation or gas evolution was observed in any of the tested analgesics except for sodium metamizole, where the yellow color of the solutions was observed. For samples containing the mixture of ibuprofen and colistin, the turbidity measurements revealed the presence of turbidity in the studied mixtures. The greatest change in pH relative to the value immediately after preparation was noted for combinations of ketoprofen and morphine sulfate with the tested antibiotic. Colistin was found to be incompatible with ibuprofen and metamizole sodium formulations. It should also not be combined with morphine sulfate due to the significant differences in the pH value of the preparations. The colistin 0.67 mg/mL and 1.5 mg/mL infusion solutions were physically compatible with ketoprofen, tramadol hydrochloride, and paracetamol.

Compatibility of Omadacycline With Select Parenteral Products in Simulated Y-site Administration

Omadacycline is a broad-spectrum intravenous and oral tetracycline antibiotic approved for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Available information on the compatibility of intravenous omadacycline is limited to sterile water, 0.9% sodium chloride, and 5% dextrose via a dedicated line. The objective of this work was to determine the intravenous compatibility of omadacycline with commonly used intravenous fluids and medications using simulated Y-site administration. Omadacycline was prepared at concentrations consistent with a maintenance dose (1 mg/mL) and a loading dose (2 mg/mL) with 0.9% sodium chloride according to the prescribing information. Compatibility via simulated Y-site administration was assessed with selected crystalloids (lactated Ringer's solution, magnesium sulfate, and normal saline with potassium chloride) and intravenous medications (bumetanide, furosemide, heparin, and insulin). Y-site administration was simulated by mixing 5 mL of omadacycline with 5 mL of each parenteral product prepared at standard concentrations for infusion. Compatibility was assessed by using visual, Tyndall beam, microscopy, and spectrophotometry methods at 0, 30, and 60 minutes. Omadacycline appeared physically compatible with lactated Ringer's solution, magnesium sulfate, normal saline with potassium chloride, bumetanide, heparin, and insulin at standard infusion concentrations. However, although the lower concentrations of omadacycline 1 mg/mL and furosemide 2 mg/mL showed compatibility, higher concentrations of either agent in combination resulted in incompatibility. Omadacycline appeared physically compatible with all products tested and incompatible with furosemide. Simultaneous administration of omadacycline with tested intravenous medications, except furosemide, is suggested to be safe.

Physical compatibility of sulbactam/durlobactam with select intravenous drugs during simulated Y-site administration.

Sulbactam/durlobactam is a combination antibiotic designed to target Acinetobacter baumannii, including carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains. The objective of this study was to determine the physical compatibility of sulbactam/durlobactam solution during simulated Y-site administration with 95 intravenous (IV) drugs. Vials of sulbactam/durlobactam solution were diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride injection to a volume of 100 mL (the final concentration of both drugs was 15 mg/mL). All other IV drugs were reconstituted according to the manufacturer's recommendations and diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride injection to the upper range of concentrations used clinically or tested undiluted as intended for administration. Y-site conditions were simulated by mixing 5 mL of sulbactam/durlobactam with 5 mL of the tested drug solutions in a 1:1 ratio. Solutions were inspected for physical characteristics (clarity, color, and Tyndall effect), turbidity, and pH changes before admixture, immediately post admixture, and over 4 hours. Incompatibility was defined as any observed precipitation, significant color change, positive Tyndall test, or turbidity change of ≥0.5 nephelometric turbidity unit during the observation period. Sulbactam/durlobactam was physically compatible with 38 out of 42 antimicrobials tested (90.5%) and compatible overall with 86 of 95 drugs tested (90.5%). Incompatibility was observed with albumin, amiodarone hydrochloride, ceftaroline fosamil, ciprofloxacin, daptomycin, levofloxacin, phenytoin sodium, vecuronium, and propofol. The Y-site compatibility of sulbactam/durlobactam with 95 IV drugs was described. These compatibility data will assist pharmacists and nurses to safely coordinate administration of IV medications with sulbactam/durlobactam.

Physical compatibility of ibuprofen and selected parenteral drugs during simulated y-site administration

Intravenous ibuprofen (IBF) is indicated for short-term acute moderate pain and fever management. Limited data concerning the compatibility of intravenous IBF and other parenteral medications makes it inconvenient to use in polypharmacy-required patients. The simultaneous administration of two incompatible drugs is a health- or even life-threatening medical error. This study was performed to evaluate the physical compatibility of two intravenous IBF doses (600 mg/100 mL, 400 mg/100 mL) during Y-site administration with common parenteral medications. Eight infusion fluids, seven ready-to-use solutions for infusion, and thirty concentrates or powders for solutions for infusion were examined. All these drugs, if relevant, were reconstituted and diluted following the manufacturer's instructions to achieve concentrations found most commonly in clinical practice. Samples were prepared by mixing IBFs and selected drug product solutions at the 1:1 volume ratio. All samples underwent visual inspection and determination of pH and turbidity before combining with IBF and in time points (0, 30, 60, and 120 minutes) after simulated Y-site administration with IBF. In the case of propofol, which is an emulsion for infusion, lipid droplet size, zeta potential, and polydispersity index were also determined. The incompatibilities were observed for IBF combinations with amiodarone, ciprofloxacin, clemastine, gentamicin, vinpocetine, and calcium chloride.

Compatibility of calcium chloride with milrinone, epinephrine, vasopressin, and heparin via in vitro testing and simulated Y-site administration.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate calcium chloride (CaCl) compatibility with commercially available and extemporaneously compounded milrinone, vasopressin, epinephrine, and heparin. This report describes 2 clinical scenarios in which patients experienced intravenous catheter precipitation when receiving multiple continuous infusions, including CaCl, and the results of an in vitro simulation of those scenarios. The hypothesis was that one or a combination of the medications would precipitate with CaCl. CaCl compatibility was tested in 3 stages to simulate clinical situations where line precipitation occurred. Multiple tests were conducted in each stage to determine if precipitation had occurred, including visual assessment, absorbance measurement at 650 nm, and pH measurement. First, milrinone, vasopressin, epinephrine, and heparin were mixed pairwise with CaCl in a test tube. Second, the medications were mixed in different combinations deemed likely to precipitate. Finally, 5 medications were infused via simulated Y-site administration. Incompatibility was defined as observed crystals, haziness, or turbidity upon visual inspection or absorbance of greater than 0.01 absorbance unit (AU). All solutions were tested at time 0 and at 20, 60, 240, and 1,440 minutes. Across all tests, only a commercially available formulation of heparin 2 units/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride injection precipitated with CaCl, alone or in combination with other medications. Upon further review, it was found that this specific formulation of heparin contained a monohydrate and dibasic sodium phosphate buffer. CaCl only precipitated with a commercially available heparin formulation that contained a phosphate buffer. CaCl was deemed to be compatible with all other medications and formulations tested.

Physical compatibility of remimazolam with opioid analgesics, sedatives, and muscle relaxants during simulated Y-site administration.

There is a lack of information on the compatibility of remimazolam with opioid analgesics, muscle relaxants, and other sedatives. This study aimed to evaluate the physical compatibility of remimazolam with these drug classes. Remimazolam was combined with 1 or 2 target drugs (remifentanil, fentanyl, rocuronium, vecuronium, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam). Ten physical compatibility tests were conducted, including four 3-drug compatibility tests. Remimazolam was dissolved in 0.9% sodium chloride injection to a final concentration of 5 mg/mL. Other medications were diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride injection to obtain clinically relevant concentrations. Compatibility tests were conducted with 3 test solutions, wherein remimazolam and the target drugs were compounded at equal volume ratios (1:1 or 1:1:1). Visual appearance was assessed and testing of Tyndall effect, turbidity, and pH was performed immediately after mixing and then again 1 hour and 4 hours after mixing. Appearance and turbidity were evaluated by comparison with the control solution of each target drug diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride injection to the same concentration as the test solution. All drugs tested were determined to be compatible with remimazolam. The drug combination with the highest change of turbidity was remimazolam and vecuronium (a mean increase of 0.16 NTU relative to the remimazolam control solution), 4 hours after mixing. The combination with the highest pH was remimazolam, fentanyl, and vecuronium (mean [SD], 3.76 [0.01]), 4 hours after mixing. The combination of remimazolam and fentanyl showed a larger change in pH at 4 hours after mixing (a mean increase of 2.6%) than immediately after mixing. Remifentanil, fentanyl, rocuronium, vecuronium, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam are physically compatible with remimazolam during simulated Y-site administration.

Simulated Y-site compatibility of atosiban acetate with selected intravenous drugs

ObjectiveThe physical compatibility of atosiban and selected drugs during simulated Y-site administration was evaluated. We also searched for any compatibility predictions regarding its physicochemical properties. Study designTest admixtures were prepared by mixing 5 mL of each study drug solution with 5 mL of atosiban solution in a 1:1 ratio to simulate Y-site infusion. Assessments were made immediately after mixing (baseline), and at 0.5, 1, and 3 h. Visual incompatibility was defined as a presence of haze or any visible particulate matter, gas formation, or colour change. Turbidity and pH variation of the admixtures were also assessed using instrumental methods. ResultsNone of the admixtures used with atosiban exhibited visual changes and no incompatibility regarding instrumental methods were observed, because no admixture had an increase of 0.5 nephelometric turbidity units, and no pH change was above one unit when compared to baseline. However, the pH of ampicillin and omeprazole admixtures fell outside of the atosiban stability range. ConclusionsOur study showed no physical incompatibility between atosiban and the test drugs in terms of visual changes or nephelometric and pH measurements. However, we recommend against atosiban and ampicillin or omeprazole coadministration until complementary compatibility studies are performed.

Physical compatibility of Normosol-R with critical care medications used in patients with COVID-19 during simulated Y-site administration.

Guidelines from the National Institutes of Health support the use of balanced crystalloid solutions such as Normosol-R (Hospira, Lake Forest, IL) for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, their clinical utility is hindered by a lack of Y-site compatibility data that is essential for use in patients with limited intravenous access. The objective of this study was to determine the physical compatibility of selected intensive care unit medications with Normosol-R. The study involved laboratory simulation of Y-site compatibility. Medications tested included amiodarone, caspofungin, dexmedetomidine, dobutamine, dopamine, epinephrine, levofloxacin, norepinephrine, pantoprazole, phenylephrine, piperacillin/tazobactam, vancomycin, and vasopressin. Tests performed were visual assessment with Tyndall light, turbidity measurement, and pH assessment. Tests were performed immediately after mixing (with the exception of turbidity testing) and after 1 hour and 4 hours. Incompatibility was defined as observation of haze, gas, particulate, or color change or admixture turbidity above 0.3 or above 0.5 nephelometric turbidity unit (NTU), depending on whether the baseline turbidity was less than or greater than 0.5 NTU, respectively. Analysis of solubility and compatibility based on change from baseline to admixture pH in relation to the reported -log of the acid dissociation constant (pKa) was performed. There was no evidence of visual incompatibility for any of the admixtures when mixed with Normosol-R. Turbidity exceeded the defined threshold with pantoprazole, phenylephrine, and highly concentrated norepinephrine. Pantoprazole was the only test medication with a significant pH change when compared to its pKa. Normosol-R is compatible for Y-site administration with all tested medications except for pantoprazole, phenylephrine, and highly concentrated norepinephrine, allowing for potential increased use in patients with COVID-19.

Intravenous Compatibility of Ceftazidime–Avibactam and Aztreonam Using Simulated and Actual Y-site Administration

PurposeThe objective of this communication was to determine the intravenous compatibility of ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam using simulated and actual Y-site administration. MethodsCeftazidime–avibactam was reconstituted and diluted to concentrations of 8, 25, and 50 mg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride. Aztreonam was reconstituted and diluted to concentrations of 10 and 20 mg/mL. Each combination of concentrations was tested for compatibility using visual, Tyndall beam, microscopy, turbidity, and pH assessments. Microscopy results were compared to those from sodium chloride 0.9% in water, pH was compared to that at time 0, and turbidity of combinations was compared to that of individual agents. Actual Y-site mixing was conducted over 2-h infusions with samples collected at 0, 1, and 2 h. Test results were evaluated at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after mixing. All experiments were completed in triplicate. FindingsAcross simulated and actual Y-site experiments, no evidence of incompatibility between combinations of ceftazidime–avibactam + aztreonam was observed. Visual and microscopic tests revealed no particulate matter, color changes, or turbidity. Tyndall beam tests were negative with all combinations. No evidence of incompatibility was observed in turbidity testing. The pH values were consistent across each of the 6 combinations, from immediately after mixing until 12 h after mixing. When the addition of agents was reversed in simulated Y-site experiments, no differences in compatibility were observed. No differences in compatibility between actual and simulated Y-site administration were observed, and there was minimal variability across all replicate experiments. ImplicationsCeftazidime–avibactam, at concentrations of 8, 25, and 50 mg/mL, appeared compatible with aztreonam at concentrations of 10 and 20 mg/mL.

Compatibility of treprostinil sodium and dopamine hydrochloride during simulated Y-site administration.

To evaluate the physical and chemical compatibilities of treprostinil sodium and dopamine hydrochloride. Treprostinil sodium (4,000, 76,000, and 500,000 ng/mL) were mixed with dopamine hydrochloride (0.6, 3.2, 6, and 40 mg/mL). Samples were obtained at hours 0, 1, 2, and 4 for physical compatibility and chemical stability testing. Physical compatibility was assessed by visual examination and measurements of turbidity and pH. Drug concentrations were assessed using stability-indicating liquid chromatography mass spectrophotometry (LCMS) for treprostinil sodium and stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for dopamine hydrochloride. Treprostinil sodium 4,000 and 76,000 ng/mL, when mixed with dopamine hydrochloride 0.6, 3.2, 6, and 40 mg/mL, were stable for 4 hours. Treprostinil sodium 500,000 ng/mL was stable when mixed with dopamine hydrochloride 0.6 mg/mL for 4 hours, but when mixed with dopamine hydrochloride 3.2, 6, and 40 mg/mL, significant precipitation was seen. Treprostinil sodium 4,000 and 76,000 ng/mL were stable for 4 hours during simulated Y-site coadministration with dopamine hydrochloride 0.6, 3.2, 6, and 40 mg/mL. Treprostinil sodium 500,000 ng/mL is stable when mixed with dopamine hydrochloride 0.6 mg/mL.

Y-Site Compatibility of Intravenous Levetiracetam With Commonly Used Critical Care Medications.

Purpose: Levetiracetam is an antiepileptic medication commonly used in critical care areas for seizure treatment or prophylaxis. Compatibility data of levetiracetam with other critical care medications are limited, which can make administration challenging. This study aims to assess the physical Y-site compatibility of intravenous levetiracetam with some other commonly used critical care medications. Methods: Y-site administration was simulated by independently mixing levetiracetam with each of 11 selected medications in a 4-dram, colorless, screw-cap, glass vial, at a 1:1 ratio. Clinically used concentrations of each medication were compounded in 0.9% sodium chloride following United States Pharmacopeia chapter 797 standards. Physical compatibility was observed and assessed at 0, 15, and 30 minutes after mixing. Medication mixtures were considered physically incompatible if there was visual evidence of color change, gas evolution, haze, or particulate formation, pH change >10%, or if they had an absorbance value >0.010 A. Results: No evidence of physical incompatibility was observed during simulated Y-site testing with cisatracurium 1 mg/mL, dexmedetomidine 4 µg/mL, fosphenytoin 15 mg PE/mL, norepinephrine 16 mg/mL, norepinephrine 32 mg/mL, norepinephrine 64 mg/mL, piperacillin-tazobactam 33.75 mg/mL, propofol 10 mg/mL, vancomycin 5 mg/mL, or vasopressin 1 unit/mL when tested in 0.9% sodium chloride. Levetiracetam was incompatible with piperacillin-tazobactam 45 mg/mL. Conclusion: Levetiracetam 5 mg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride was found to be physically compatible for 30 minutes with 10 of the 11 medications tested during simulated Y-site administration.

Compatibility of Lactated Ringer's Injection With 94 Selected Intravenous Drugs During Simulated Y-site Administration.

Objective: To test the compatibility of intravenous (IV) lactated Ringer's injection (LR) with 94 injectable (IV) drugs during simulated Y-site administration. Methods: Ninety-four IV drugs were investigated for compatibility with LR (Baxter). Each sample was prepared in duplicate and performed at room temperature. Two observers performed visual evaluation independently immediately upon mixing and then 15 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, and 4 hours after admixture. Another observer performed a particle counting test on 1 of the 2 duplicates of each admixture that did not immediately show incompatibility and then after 4 hours by a light obscuration particle count test. Results: Of the 94 tested drugs, 86 were found to be compatible with LR. A total of 8 drugs were found to be physically incompatible. Of these incompatible drugs, 7 were directly identified visually and 1 was confirmed by the light obscuration particle count test. Conclusion: Lactated Ringer's injection was physically compatible for 4 hours with 86 tested drugs during simulated Y-site administration. Eight drugs, ciprofloxacin, cyclosporine, diazepam, ketamine, lorazepam, nitroglycerin, phenytoin, and propofol, were found to be incompatible and should not be administered with LR.

Assessment of the Physical Compatibility of Eravacycline and Common Parenteral Drugs During Simulated Y-site Administration

PurposeEravacycline is a broad-spectrum, intravenous fluorocycline antibiotic approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults. A 60-minute infusion is recommended for each infused dose. Compatibility data that may allow convenient Y-site administration of eravacycline with other parenteral medications are unavailable. We aimed to determine the physical compatibility of eravacycline with other intravenous medications by simulated Y-site administration. MethodsEravacycline was reconstituted according to published prescribing information and diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride to a concentration of 0.6 mg/mL. Simulated Y-site administration was performed by mixing 5 mL of eravacycline with an equal volume of 51 other intravenous medications, including crystalloid and carbohydrate hydration fluids and 20 antimicrobials. Secondary medications were assessed at the upper range of concentrations considered standard for intravenous infusion. Mixtures underwent visual inspection and turbidity measurement immediately on mixture and at 3 subsequent time points (30, 60, and 120 minutes after admixture), and pH was measured at 60 minutes for comparison with the baseline value of the secondary medication. FindingsEravacycline was physically compatible with 41 parenteral drugs (80%) by simulated Y-site administration. Incompatibility was observed with albumin, amiodarone hydrochloride, ceftaroline fosamil, colistimethate sodium, furosemide, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, micafungin sodium, propofol, and sodium bicarbonate. ImplicationsEravacycline for injection was physically compatible with most parenteral medications assessed. Pharmacists and nurses should be knowledgeable of the observed incompatibilities with eravacycline to prevent the unintentional mixing of incompatible intravenous medications.

Physicochemical Compatibility of Dexmedetomidine With Parenteral Nutrition.

Dexmedetomidine is an α2-agonist used as a sedative agent in the intensive care setting. Simultaneous administration of dexmedetomidine and parenteral nutrition (PN) may be required. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical compatibility of dexmedetomidine Y-site administered with PN. Three PN and 3 dexmedetomidine solutions were compounded. The tested infusion rate for PN was 66mL/h. For dexmedetomidine, we considered the initial and maximum infusion rates (0.7 and 1.4 µg/kg/h) detailed in the data sheet. Taking this into account and considering a weight range of 55-95 kg, we tested 2 dexmedetomidine infusion rates (10 and 36mL/h). The samples obtained were examined visually against light. pH was analyzed with a pH meter. Mean fat droplet diameter was determined by dynamic light scattering. Quantification of dexmedetomidine concentration was carried out by ultraperformance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry. For each PN-dexmedetomidine admixture, tests were performed in triplicate. No alterations were observed by visual inspection. Average pH was 6.25±0.01. Droplet diameter remained below 500 nm (298±10 nm for 10-mL/h rate and 303±5 nm for 36-mL/h rate). Dexmedetomidine concentrations at t=0 were 519±31ng/mL and 1391±90ng/mL for 10- and 36-mL/h infusion rates, respectively. At t=24 hours, the concentrations obtained were 494±22 and 1332±102ng/mL, which translates into ≥90% of the initial concentrations. Dexmedetomidine is physicochemically compatible with PN during simulated Y-site administration at the tested infusion rates.

Physicochemical compatibility of dexmedetomidine with total parenteral nutrition

Rationale: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an α2-agonist used as an intravenous sedative agent in the intensive care setting. In certain cases, simultaneous administration of DEX and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) may be required. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical compatibility of DEX with TPN during simulated Y-site administration.

Physical compatibility of plazomicin with select i.v. drugs during simulated Y-site administration.

The results of a study to determine the physical compatibility of plazomicin sulfate solution during simulated Y-site administration with 92 i.v. drugs are reported. Plazomicin injection solution (500 mg/10 mL) was diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride or 5% dextrose for injection to a final volume of 50 mL (final plazomicin concentration, 24 mg/mL), consistent with a 15-mg/kg dose administered to an 80-kg patient (i.e., 1,200 mg). All other i.v. drugs were reconstituted according to manufacturers' recommendations and diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride or 5% dextrose for injection to the upper range of concentrations used clinically. Y-site conditions were simulated by mixing 5 mL of plazomicin solution with 5 mL of tested drug solutions in a 1:1 ratio. Solutions were assessed for visual (via color and Tyndall beam testing), turbidity (using a laboratory-grade turbidimeter), and pH changes over a 60-minute observation period. Incompatibility was defined a priori as precipitation, color change, a positive Tyndall test, or a turbidity change of ≥0.5 nephelometric turbidity units at any time during the 60-minute observation period. Plazomicin was physically compatible with 79 of the 92 drugs tested. Determinations of physical incompatibility with plazomicin were made for 13 drugs: albumin, amiodarone, amphotericin B deoxycholate, anidulafungin, calcium chloride, daptomycin, esomeprazole, heparin, levofloxacin, methylprednisolone, micafungin, phenytoin, and propofol, CONCLUSION: Plazomicin at a concentration of 24 mg/mL was physically compatible with 85% of the drugs tested, including 31 of 36 antimicrobial agents.

Physical compatibility of MCT/LCT propofol emulsions with crystalloids during simulated Y-site administration

ObjectiveIn intensive care units numerous drugs have to be infused simultaneously, resulting inline incompatibility. Propofol is formulated as a lipid emulsion and it is well known that electrolytes can affect...