Similar Objective Response Rate Research Articles

Cryoablation versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with lenvatinib from a real-world study.

54 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by hypovascularity, the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been suboptimal. This study sought to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety profiles of cryoablation (CRYO) plus lenvatinib (LEN) against TACE plus LEN for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) patients within a real-world clinical practice. Methods: A prospective study was conducted involving 234 patients with u-HCC who underwent treatment with LEN plus either CRYO or TACE at the Fifth Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital from October 2018 to May 2023. Treatment selection was determined through multidisciplinary discussions among a liver cancer board, weighing the pros and cons. The final decision was made by the patients and clinicians based on consensus. Clinical characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Tumor response was based on RECIST v1.1 and mRECIST by blinded independent imaging review, AEs by CTCAE v5.0. Results: In this study, 212 (90.6%) were male, with an average age of 56 years. 206 (88%) patients were infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), and 178 (76.1%) and 77 (32.9%) patients were classified as Child-Pugh A and BCLC B. After PSM, the clinical characteristics were comparable between the CRYO plus LEN and the TACE plus LEN group. Over a median follow-up of 31.8 months, 124 patients (53%) died. The CRYO plus LEN group demonstrated similar OS (24.2 vs. 22.0 months, P = 0.64), PFS (8.7 vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.48), ORR (53.1% vs. 53.1%, P = 1.00), and DCR (86.5% vs. 78.1%, P = 0.19) compared to the TACE plus LEN group after PSM, with consistent results observed before PSM. The two groups exhibited comparable AEs. In addition to similar LEN-related AEs, the most common CRYO-related AEs included 50% elevated ALT, 50% elevated AST, and 38.5% fever, which were consistent with the TACE related AEs. Notably, the incidence of abdominal pain was higher in the TACE plus LEN group compared to the CRYO plus LEN group (7.5% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.021), while pleural effusion was more prevalent in the CRYO plus LEN group than that in the TACE plus LEN group (6.2% vs. 0, P = 0.038). Conclusions: The CRYO plus LEN group exhibited comparable efficacy and well-tolerated safety with TACE plus LEN for u-HCC patients within a real-world clinical setting. It offers a viable alternative for HCC characterized by hypovascularity, presenting a promising therapeutic approach in the clinical management of u-HCC. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2200058643 .

Efficacy and safety of standard BEACOPP regimen versus ABVD regimen for treatment of advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The current treatment regimens for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) are associated with high incidences of adverse events. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin + bleomycin + vincristine + dacarbazine (ABVD) and standard bleomycin + etoposide + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide + vincristine + procarbazine + prednisone (BEACOPP) chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced stage HL. This multicenter, randomized, parallel, open, positive control noninferiority trial was conducted from 2016 to 2019 and comprised 93 subjects who were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between the treatment (BEACOPP; n = 44) and control (ABVD; n = 49) groups. The primary efficacy endpoint of this trial was the objective response rate (ORR) after eight cycles of chemotherapy, which was 100.00% (36/36) in the treatment group and 95.74% (45/49) in the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions was 100% in both groups. Significant differences (P < 0.05) in the incidences of grade 3 (39/44 [88.64%] vs. 23/49 [46.94%]) and grade 4 (27/44 [61.36%] vs. 8/49 [16.94%]) adverse events were observed between the treatment and control groups, respectively. However, most of these reactions were manageable, with no serious consequences, and were reversible after discontinuation of the treatment. Both regimens had a similar ORR and were associated with a high number of adverse events. The ABVD regimen was better tolerated and safer than the standard BEACOPP regimen. This study indicates that the standard BEACOPP regimen may be considered as a treatment option for patients with advanced HL.

Pembrolizumab plus either epacadostat or placebo for cisplatin-ineligible urothelial carcinoma: results from the ECHO-307/KEYNOTE-672 study

BackgroundIndoleamine 2,3- dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an immunosuppressive enzyme that has been correlated with shorter disease-specific survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC). IDO1 may counteract the antitumor effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of IDO1. In the phase I/II ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037 study, epacadostat plus pembrolizumab resulted in a preliminary objective response rate (ORR) of 35% in a cohort of patients with advanced UC.MethodsECHO-307/KEYNOTE-672 was a double-blinded, randomized, phase III study. Eligible adults had confirmed locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic UC of the urinary tract and were ineligible to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive epacadostat (100 mg twice daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) or placebo plus pembrolizumab for up to 35 pembrolizumab infusions. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1).ResultsA total of 93 patients were randomized (epacadostat plus pembrolizumab, n = 44; placebo plus pembrolizumab, n = 49). Enrollment was stopped early due to emerging data from the phase III ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252 study. The median duration of follow-up was 64 days in both arms. Based on all available data at cutoff, ORR (unconfirmed) was 31.8% (95% CI, 22.46–55.24%) for epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and 24.5% (95% CI, 15.33–43.67%) for placebo plus pembrolizumab. Circulating kynurenine levels numerically increased from C1D1 to C2D1 in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm and decreased in the epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab arm. Epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab combination treatment was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to the placebo arm. Treatment discontinuations due to treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with epacadostat (11.6% vs. 4.1%).ConclusionsTreatment with epacadostat plus pembrolizumab resulted in a similar ORR and safety profile as placebo plus pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with previously untreated locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic UC. At a dose of 100 mg twice daily, epacadostat did not appear to completely normalize circulating kynurenine levels when administered with pembrolizumab. Larger studies with longer follow-up and possibly testing higher doses of epacadostat, potentially in different therapy settings, may be warranted.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03361865, retrospectively registered December 5, 2017.

Abstract PO3-20-02: Olaparib front line therapy with endocrine therapy in locally advanced unresectable or in metastatic breast cancer: OFELIA TRIAL

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Currently, patients with recurrent or metastatic hormone-sensitive breast cancer are treated with endocrine therapy (ET) in combination with cyclin inhibitors, as it has been shown to improve both overall survival and progression-free survival. However, it has been observed that patients with gBRCA1 or gBRCA2 mutations, who receive treatment with endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors, have lower OS and lower PFS compared to those without mutations. These findings could be due to the presence of higher cyclin E mRNA levels, which encode the protein that stimulates CDK2 activity provoking a resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Having this said, the use of PARP inhibitors a potential first-line therapeutic option in combination with endocrine therapy could be an option to be re evaluated. JUSTIFICATION: PARP inhibitors (iPARP) are recommended in international guidelines as second-line palliative treatment and also as adjuvant management in the case of Olaparib. The use of iPARP is approved only as a second-line treatment in HER2 hormone-sensitive breast cancer, according to the results of the EMBRACA and OlympiAD clinical trials. However, these two clinical trials were not designed to evaluate its effectiveness as first-line palliative treatment. Given that patients with gBRCA mutations have lower overall survival when administered cyclin inhibitors (iCDK 4/6) + Endocrine therapy (ET) compared to those without mutations, it is necessary to reevaluate the use of iPARP as first-line palliative treatment in conjunction with ET, with the expectation of achieving a similar objective response rate and progression-free survival. OBJECTIVE: To Determine the ORR in patients with recurrent or metastatic hormone-sensitive HER2-negative breast cancer managed with PARP inhibitors + Endocrine therapy. HYPOTHESIS: The use of PARP inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy will have an objective response rate of 60% or higher in both early stages and advanced disease. METHODOLOGY: Phase 2 open-label, multicenter clinical trial. Study Population: Cohort : All pre- or postmenopausal patients with a diagnosis of recurrent or metastatic hormone-sensitive HER2-negative breast cancer with gBRCA1 and/or gBRCA2 mutation. Sample: The inclusion of patients will be based on meeting the inclusion criteria. We plan to achieve an ORR of at least 60% with an acceptable minimum of 40%. Assuming a one-sided alpha level of 0.05 and statistical power of 80%, a two-stage Simon design was used to calculate the required sample size. In the first stage, a minimum of 23 patients is assumed, of which 14 patients need to achieve the desired response rate to proceed to the second stage. In the second stage, an additional 28 patients will be added to obtain a total sample size of 51 patients. The objective response rate will be evaluated using RECIST v1.1 criteria at 8 weeks after initiating treatment, with continued assessment during the first year, followed by assessments every 12 weeks during the second and third year, and then every 24 weeks until progression or toxicity. EXPECTED RESULTS: PARP inhibitors + Endocrine therapy will have a similar ORR as reported with cyclin inhibitors + Endocrine therapy, as well as a benefit in progression-free survival. Citation Format: Carlos Arturo González Núñez, Paula Cabrera-Galeana, Juan Enrique Bargalló Rocha, Rafael Vazquez-Romo, Sergio Aguilar-Villanueva, Alexandra Garcilazo, Areli Velazquez-Martinez, Andrea Maliachi, Ruben Rodriguez. Olaparib front line therapy with endocrine therapy in locally advanced unresectable or in metastatic breast cancer: OFELIA TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-20-02.

Durable Response to Enfortumab Vedotin Compared to Re-challenging Chemotherapy in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma After Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4, has been used for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) after progressing on checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Re-challenging chemotherapy with platinum agents and continuing CPIs beyond progressive disease (PD) have often been chosen following PD on CPIs, and several studies indicate favorable treatment effects of re-challenging chemotherapy. There is little evidence for comparing EV and re-challenging chemotherapy in real-world clinical practice. The aim was to reveal the real-world treatment outcomes of EV, re-challenging chemotherapy, and continuing CPIs beyond PD in mUC patients. A multi-institutional dataset of 350 mUC patients treated with CPIs was utilized. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) were evaluated to compare the treatment arms. One hundred and nine mUC patients were treated with EV with a median follow-up of 6.4months. The ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 48% and 70%, respectively. The OS from PD on pembrolizumab exhibited significant differences among the three groups, with a median OS of 8, 14, and 29months in continuing pembrolizumab beyond PD, re-challenging chemotherapy, and EV, respectively. When comparing the survival outcomes from the initiation of the treatment, there is neither a difference in OS (p=0.124), PFS (p=0.936), nor ORR (p=0.816) between EV and re-challenging chemotherapy. Notably, the DOR in patients who achieved an objective response was significantly longer in the EV group than the re-challenging chemotherapy group (a median of 11 and 5months, p=0.049). For OS, the difference was not statistically significant (27 and 11months in EV and re-challenging chemotherapy, respectively: p=0.05). A superior effect of EV on patient survival compared to re-challenging chemotherapy and continuing pembrolizumab beyond PD was observed in our real-world analysis, which is attributed to the durable DOR in EV treatment despite the similar ORR to re-challenging chemotherapy.

Clinical dose rationale of tislelizumab in patients with solid or hematological advanced tumors.

Tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated improved survival benefits over standard of care for multiple cancer indications. We present the clinical rationale and data supporting tislelizumab dose recommendation in patients with advanced tumors. The phase I, first-in-human, dose-finding BGB-A317-001 study (data cutoff [DCO]: August 2017) examined the following tislelizumab dosing regimens: 0.5-10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (q2w), 2-5 mg/kg q2w or q3w, and 200 mg q3w. Similar objective response rates (ORRs) were reported in the 2 and 5 mg/kg q2w or q3w cohorts. Safety outcomes (grade ≥3 adverse events [AEs], AEs leading to dose modification/discontinuation, immune-mediated AEs, and infusion-related reactions) were generally comparable across the dosing range examined. These results, alongside the convenience of a fixed q3w dose, formed the basis of choosing 200 mg q3w as the recommended dosing regimen for further clinical use. Pooled exposure-response (E-R) analyses by logistic regression using data from study BGB-A317-001 (DCO: August 2020) and three additional phase I/II studies (DCOs: 2018-2020) showed no statistically significant correlation between tislelizumab pharmacokinetic exposure and ORR across multiple solid tumor types or classical Hodgkin's lymphoma, nor was exposure associated with any of the safety end points evaluated over the dose range tested. Hence, tislelizumab showed a relatively flat E-R relationship. Overall, the totality of data, including efficacy, safety, and E-R analyses, together with the relative convenience of a fixed q3w dose, provided clinical rationale for the recommended dosing regimen of tislelizumab 200 mg q3w for multiple cancer indications.

The salvage lenvatinib-based regimen provides survival benefit in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Salvage treatment for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has yet to be identified. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a salvage lenvatinib-based regimen for refractory mCRC. In total, 371 patients were categorized into lenvatinib-based and non-lenvatinib-based groups. In the lenvatinib-based group, patients who received lenvatinib at a dosage of 10 mg/day were categorized into lenvatinib/chemotherapy and lenvatinib/immunotherapy subgroups. We reported overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method. OS1 was used to measure the time from disease progression after TAS-102 and regorafenib treatment to death, while OS2 was used to measure the time from TAS-102 or regorafenib treatment to death. Propensity score matching analysis was employed to compare the characteristics between the lenvatinib-based and non-lenvatinib-based groups. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) information was analyzed using R software. The lenvatinib-based group exhibited longer OS than did the non-lenvatinib-based group (OS1, 11.4 vs. 3.7 months; OS2, 27.2 vs. 8.2 months). The disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR) of the lenvatinib-based regimens were 69.4% and 6.1%, respectively. Lenvatinib/chemotherapy and lenvatinib/immunotherapy had similar PFS, OS, DCR, and ORR. The adverse effects were manageable. After propensity score matching, the lenvatinib-based group continued to exhibit significantly longer OS1 and OS2 than did the non-lenvatinib-based group. NGS analysis revealed that GNAS and KRAS alterations were associated with a worse treatment response and prolonged survival, respectively. In conclusion, a moderate-dose salvage lenvatinib-based regimen demonstrated promising clinical activity and tolerability in treating refractory mCRC.

Clinical efficacy and adverse reactions analysis of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy and associated adverse reactions of Programmed Death Receptor-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitors in the management of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In this retrospective study, 54 patients with advanced ESCC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in our hospital from January 2021 to January 2023 were identified as the research subjects. Using propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, patients only receiving chemotherapy were recruited as controls. The clinical effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 was evaluated by comparing the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed for treatment outcome assessments. Adverse events (AEs) between the two groups were recorded and compared. Patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had a higher rate of ORR (33.33%) and disease control (85.19%), compared to controls with an objective response rate of 20.37% and a disease control rate of 59.26%. The two groups showed similar ORR results, while the incorporation of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors resulted in significantly increased DCR when compared to the controls. The median OS was 22 months (95% CI: 1,629 months) for the control group and 31 months (95% CI: 28NA) for the study group, suggesting OS benefits offered by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment (HR=0.479, 95% CI: 0.284, 0.809). The median PFS was 15 months (95% CI: 1,223 months) for the control group and 23 months (95% CI: 1,926) for the study group, indicating more PFS benefits provided by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (HR=0.662, 95% CI: 0.436, 1.005). Adverse events and their severity were recorded during patient follow-up, and no grade 5 adverse events were reported in either group. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events between the two groups was similar, while PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors appeared to significantly reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal reactions in patients. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors integrated with chemotherapy provide significant benefits in the management of patients with advanced ESCC without increasing adverse events.

A pilot study of multi-antigen stimulated cell therapy-I plus camrelizumab and apatinib in patients with advanced bone and soft-tissue sarcomas

BackgroundCell-based immunotherapy shows the therapeutic potential in sarcomas, in addition to angiogenesis-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Multi-antigen stimulated cell therapy-I (MASCT-I) technology is a sequential immune cell therapy for cancer, which composes of multiple antigen-loaded dendritic cell (DC) vaccines followed by the adoptive transfer of anti-tumor effector T-cells.MethodsIn this phase 1 study, we assessed MASCT-I plus camrelizumab (an ICI against PD-1) and apatinib (a highly selective TKI targeting VEGFR2) in patients with unresectable recurrent or metastatic bone and soft-tissue sarcoma after at least one line of prior systemic therapy. One MASCT-I course consisted of 3 DC subcutaneous injections, followed by 3 active T cell infusions administered 18–27 days after each DC injection. In schedule-I group, 3 DC injections were administered with a 28-day interval in all courses; in schedule-II group, 3 DC injections were administered with a 7-day interval in the first course and with a 28-day interval thereafter. All patients received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks and oral apatinib 250 mg daily.ResultsFrom October 30, 2019, to August 12, 2021, 19 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to schedule-I group (n = 9) and schedule-II group (n = 10). Of the 19 patients, 11 (57.9%) experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Patients in schedule-II group showed similar objective response rate (ORR) with those in schedule-I group (30.0% versus 33.3%) but had higher disease control rate (DCR; 90.0% versus 44.4%) and longer median progression-free survival (PFS; 7.7 versus 4.0 months). For the 13 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, the ORR was 30.8%, DCR was 76.9%, and median PFS was 12.9 months; for the 6 patients with osteosarcomas, the ORR was 33.3%, the DCR was 50.0%, and median PFS was 5.7 months.ConclusionsOverall, MASCT-I plus camrelizumab and apatinib was safe and showed encouraging efficacy in advanced bone and soft-tissue sarcoma, and schedule-II administration method was recommended.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04074564.

Clinical activity of nivolumab in combination with eribulin in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: A phase IB/II study (KCSG BR18-16)

AimWe evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and eribulin combination therapy for metastatic breast cancer (BC) in Asian populations. MethodsIn this parallel phase II study, adult patients with histologically confirmed recurrent/metastatic hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+HER2-) or triple-negative BC (TNBC) were prospectively enroled from 10 academic hospitals in Korea (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04061863). They received nivolumab (360 mg) on day 1 plus eribulin (1.4 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate in each subtype. Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Advanced Solid Tumors version 1.1, disease control rate, overall survival, and treatment toxicity. The association between PD-L1 expression and efficacy was investigated. ResultsForty-five patients with HR+HER2- BC and 45 with TNBC were enroled. Their median age was 51 (range, 31–71) years, and 74 (82.2%) received one or two prior treatments before enrolment. Six-month PFS was 47.2% and 25.1% in the HR+HER2- and TNBC cohorts, respectively. Median PFS was 5.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3–7.4) and 3.0 (95% CI: 2.1–5.2) months in the HR+HER2- and TNBC groups, respectively. ORRs were 53.3% (complete response [CR]: 0, partial response [PR]: 24) and 28.9% (CR: 1, PR: 12). Patients with PD-L1+ tumours (PD-L1 expression ≥1%) and PD-L1- tumours (ORR 50% versus 53.8% in HR+HER2-, 30.8% versus 29.0% in TNBC) had similar ORRs. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 adverse event; the most common immune-related adverse events (AEs) were grades 1/2 hypothyroidism and pruritus. Five patients discontinued therapy because of immune-related AEs. ConclusionNivolumab plus eribulin showed promising efficacy and tolerable safety in previously treated HER2- metastatic BC. Trial registrationNCT04061863

A Real-World Comparative Analysis of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Radiotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis.

This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of atezolizumab-plus-bevacizumab (Ate/Bev) therapy with those of transarterial chemoembolization plus radiotherapy (TACE + RT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and without metastasis. Between June 2016 and October 2022, we consecutively enrolled 855 HCC patients with PVTT. After excluding 758 patients, 97 patients (n = 37 in the Ate/Bev group; n = 60 in the TACE + RT group) were analyzed. The two groups showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics and had similar objective response and disease control rates. However, the Ate/Bev group showed a significantly higher one-year survival rate (p = 0.041) compared to the TACE + RT group, which was constantly displayed in patients with extensive HCC burden. Meanwhile, the clinical outcomes were comparable between the two groups in patients with unilobar intrahepatic HCC. In Cox-regression analysis, Ate/Bev treatment emerged as a significant factor for better one-year survival (p = 0.049). Finally, in propensity-score matching, the Ate/Bev group demonstrated a better one-year survival (p = 0.02) and PFS (p = 0.01) than the TACE + RT group. In conclusion, Ate/Bev treatment demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to TACE + RT treatment in HCC patients with PVTT. Meanwhile, in patients with unilobar intrahepatic HCC, TACE + RT could also be considered as an alternative treatment option alongside Ate/Bev therapy.

Effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Atezolizumab-bevacizumab (atezo-bev) is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, its effectiveness and safety in other populations, including those with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class B cirrhosis, is unclear. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, were searched from 1st May, 2020 till 5th October, 2022; the last date of access was January 31, 2023. Pooled progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and radiological response rate among patients receiving atezo-bev were compared between patients with CTP-A and CTP-B cirrhosis, with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and among those receiving the drug as first-line and later line therapy. The protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42022364430). Among 47 studies (n=5400 patients), pooled PFS and OS were 6.86 (95% CI, 6.31-7.41) and 13.8 months (95% CI, 11.81-15.8), respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were 26.7% (24.6-29.1) and 75.3% (73.1-77.4) using RECIST criteria, and 34% (30.3-37.8) and 73.6% (68.8-78) using mRECIST criteria, respectively. Among those receiving atezo-bev, patients with CTP-B cirrhosis had similar ORRs by RECIST (odds ratio [OR], 1.42 [0.77-2.6]; P=0.25) and mRECIST criteria (OR, 1.33 [0.52-3.39]; P=0.53) but shorter PFS (mean difference [MD]:3.83 months [1.81-5.84]) than those with CTP-A cirrhosis. Compared to patients receiving TKIs, those receiving atezo-bev had longer PFS (MD: 2.27 months [0.94-3.5]) and higher ORR (RECIST: OR, 1.44 [1.01-2.04] and mRECIST: OR, 1.33 [1.01-1.75]). Compared to first-line therapy, later-line therapy had lower ORR (RECIST: OR, 1.82 [1.3-2.53]; P<0.001 and mRECIST: OR, 2.02 [1.34-3.05]) but comparable PFS (MD: 0.58 months [-0.18 to 1.35]) among nine studies. The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events among patients with CTP-A and CTP-B cirrhosis was comparable (OR, 0.89 [0.45-1.74]) as it was for patients receiving atezo-bev and TKIs (OR, 0.86 [0.61-1.2]). Our findings suggest that atezo-bev is safe and effective as first-line systemic therapy for patients with uHCC and CTP-A or CTP-B cirrhosis. An unsolicited grant from ROCHE Products India Pvt Ltd. was received for publication.

Platinum Sensitivity in IDH1/2 Mutated Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Not All “BRCAness” Is Created Equal

Preclinical data suggest that IDH1/2 mutations result in defective homologous recombination repair (HRR). We hypothesized that patients with IDH1/2mt intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) would benefit more from 1 L platinum chemotherapy than patients with wildtype (WT) tumors. We performed a multicenter retrospective study of 81 patients with unresectable IHCC treated with 1 L platinum with a primary endpoint of clinical benefit rate (CBR). Patients with IDH1/2mt tumors had a similar CBR and objective response rate compared to those with IDH WT disease (59 versus 54%; p = 0.803), suggesting that a relationship between platinum sensitivity and HRR gene defects may be specific to tumor context.

Retreatment with EGFR inhibitor in non-small cell lung cancer patients previously exposed to EGFR-TKI: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

e21159 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are the standard therapy for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Unfortunately, patients eventually develop resistance to EGFR-TKI and disease progression. Re-exposure after a drug-free interval may be an alternative to overcome tumor resistance. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess EGFR-TKI retreatment’s efficacy in advanced NSCLC. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for clinical trials and observational cohort studies evaluating EGFR-TKI retreatment in advanced NSCLC patients. We aimed to assess the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and survival outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the type of EGFRmutation and the TKI drug used in retreatment. We further stratified studies to assess the efficacy of rechallenging with the same drug used initially or a different one. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test, and I2 statistics and random effects models were fitted. Results: We included 16 studies (7 prospective clinical trials, and 9 retrospective cohorts) with 806 patients. Most of them had adenocarcinoma (70.8%), were females (58.1%), and were non-smokers (74.5%). The most frequently TKI given as the initial treatment was gefitinib (58.1%), whereas in the rechallenge it was erlotinib (36.6%) followed by gefitinib (31.6%). In a pooled analysis of patients who were retreated with TKI, the median PFS was 4.1 months (95%CI 3.0 - 4.4), and OS was 12.6 months (95%CI 10.2 - 12.6). ORR was 16% (95%CI 10 - 22%) and DCR was documented in 63% (95%CI 0.54 - 0.72%). Patients harboring a sensitive EGFR mutation had a significantly higher DCR, compared to patients with EGFRT790M mutation, and those with unknown mutational status, (DCR: 70%, 62%, and 48%, respectively, p = 0.02). Patients rechallenged with gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib had a similar DCR of 60%, while patients re-exposed to osimertinib had a greater DCR of 70% (95%CI 59 - 80%), (p &lt; 0.01). Regarding ORR, no significant difference was observed amongst the groups defined by the type of EGFR mutation (p = 0.74) or type of TKI used (p = 0.05). Rechallenge using the same versus a different TKI resulted in similar ORR and DCR. In a subgroup analysis of 102 patients who had disease control with the first TKI, 62% (95%CI 45 – 79%) achieved disease control with TKI rechallenge. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that a subgroup of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who failed TKI treatment benefit from rechallenge with an EGFR-TKI after a TKI-free interval. Re-exposure with either the same or a different TKI was shown to be equally effective. Patients treated with osimertinib and those with EGFR-sensitive mutations have better responses to the treatment.

Evolution of systemic therapy for advanced HCC patients: Did we make progress in 2022?

Evolution of systemic therapy for advanced HCC patients: Did we make progress in 2022?

D-dimer for assessment of treatment response, and survival to drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma.

D-dimer exhibits a certain prognostic value in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent hepatectomy and microwave ablation, while its value in estimating the clinical benefit of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the correlation of D-dimer with tumor features, response and survival to DEB-TACE in HCC patients. Fifty-one HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE were recruited. Their serum samples at baseline and after DEB-TACE were collected and proposed for D-dimer detection by the immunoturbidimetry method. Elevated D-dimer levels were related to a higher Child‒Pugh stage (P=0.013), tumor nodule number (P=0.031), largest tumor size (P=0.004), and portal vein invasion (P=0.050) in HCC patients. Then, patients were classified by the median value of D-dimer, and it was observed that patients with D-dimer >0.7mg/L achieved a lower complete response rate (12.0% vs. 46.2%, P=0.007) but a similar objective response rate (84.0% vs. 84.6%, P=1.000) compared to those with D-dimer ≤0.7mg/L. The Kaplan‒Meier curve showed that D-dimer >0.7mg/L (vs. ≤0.7mg/L) was related to shorter overall survival (OS) (P=0.013). Further univariate Cox regression analyses showed that D-dimer >0.7mg/L (vs. ≤0.7mg/L) was related to unfavorable OS [hazard ratio (HR): 5.524, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.209-25.229, P=0.027], but it failed to independently estimate OS (HR: 10.303, 95%CI: 0.640-165.831, P=0.100) in multivariate Cox regression analyses. Moreover, D-dimer was elevated during DEB-TACE therapy (P<0.001). D-dimer may be helpful for monitoring prognosis to DEB-TACE therapy in HCC, while further large-scale-study validation is warranted.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Results from a German real-world cohort.

Phase III trials have established atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as the novel standard of care for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, these trials raised concerns regarding treatment efficacy in non-viral HCC, and it remains unclear whether combination immunotherapy is safe and effective in patients with advanced cirrhosis. One hundred patients with unresectable HCC initiated therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at our centre between January 2020 and March 2022. The control cohort consisted of 80 patients with advanced HCC who received either sorafenib (n= 43) or lenvatinib (n= 37) as systemic treatment. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly longer within the atezolizumab/bevacizumab group and comparable to phase III data. The benefits in terms of increased objective response rate (ORR), OS and PFS were consistent across subgroups, including non-viral HCC (58%). The ROC-optimised neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) cut-off of 3.20 was the strongest independent predictor of ORR and PFS. In patients with advanced cirrhosis Child-Pugh B, liver function was significantly better preserved with immunotherapy. Patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis showed similar ORR but shorter OS and PFS compared to patients with preserved liver function. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab showed good efficacy and safety in patients with unresectable HCC and partially advanced liver cirrhosis in a real-world setting. Moreover, the NLR was able to predict response to atezolizumab/bevacizumab treatment and may guide patient selection.

Benefit and toxicity of programmed death-1 blockade vary by ethnicity in patients with advanced melanoma: an international multicentre observational study.

Programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) monotherapy is a standard treatment for advanced cutaneous melanoma, but its efficacy and toxicity are defined in white populations and remain poorly characterized in other ethnic groups, such as East Asian, Hispanic and African. To determine the efficacy and toxicity of PD-1 monotherapy in different ethnic groups. Clinical data for patients with unresectable or advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy between 2009 and 2019 were collected retrospectively from five independent institutions in the USA, Australia and China. Tumour response, survival and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were compared by ethnicity (white vs. East Asian/Hispanic/African) across different melanoma subtypes: nonacral cutaneous (NAC)/unknown primary (UP) and acral/mucosal/uveal. In total, 1135 patients were included. White patients had significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) [54%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 50-57% vs. 20%, 95% CI 13-28%; adjusted P < 0·001] and longer progression-free survival (14·2 months, 95% CI 10·7-20·3 vs. 5·4 months, 95% CI 4·5-7·0; adjusted P < 0·001) than East Asian, Hispanic and African patients in the NAC and UP subtypes. White ethnicity remained independently associated with a higher ORR (odds ratio 4·10, 95% CI 2·48-6·81; adjusted P < 0·001) and longer PFS (hazard ratio 0·58, 95% CI 0·46-0·74; adjusted P < 0·001) in multivariate analyses after adjustment for age, sex, primary anatomical location, metastasis stage, baseline lactate dehydrogenase level, mutational status and prior systemic treatment. White and East Asian/Hispanic/African patients shared similar ORR and progression-free survival in acral/mucosal/uveal melanomas. Similar melanoma-subtype-specific ethnic discrepancies were observed in complete response rate and overall survival. White patients had higher rates of gastrointestinal irAEs but lower rates of endocrine, liver and other rare types of irAEs. These differences in irAEs by ethnicity were not attributable to varying melanoma subtypes. Ethnic discrepancy in clinical benefit is specific to melanoma subtype, and East Asian, Hispanic and African patients with NAC and UP melanomas have poorer clinical benefits than previously recognized. The ethnic discrepancy in toxicity observed across different melanoma subtypes warrants an ethnicity-based irAE surveillance strategy. More research is needed to elucidate the molecular and immunological determinants of these differences. What is already known about this topic? There is a great difference in response to immunotherapy between different subtypes of melanoma (cutaneous, mucosal, acral and uveal) in patients with advanced disease. What does this study add? Our data show for the first time that there are differences between different ethnic groups in terms of both response and toxicity to immunotherapy beyond the well-appreciated discrepancies due to melanoma subtype.

Age does matter in adolescents and young adults vs. older adults with lung adenocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis comparing clinical characteristics and outcomes in response to systematic treatments.

Adenocarcinoma is the most common histological type of lung cancer in adolescents and young adults (AYAs; ˂50 years of age). However, few clinical trials that have investigated systematic treatments regard AYAs as a special cohort, and the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between AYAs and older adults is still unclear. The present study compared clinical characteristics, targetable genomic mutations, toxicity, efficacy and prognostic response to systematic treatments in AYAs (n=251) and older adults (n=1,098) who were diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma between January 2013 and December 2017 at YueBei People's Hospital (Shaoguan, China). Compared with older adults, AYAs with lung adenocarcinoma were more frequently female and non-smokers, with a higher ratio of patients receiving chemotherapy and targeted therapy, and fewer untreated. More AYAs harbored targetable genomic mutations, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations, while more older adults harbored KRAS proto-oncogene GTPase mutations. EGFR L858R was significantly more prevalent among older adults, while 19Del was common in AYAs. AYAs showed a higher objective response rate (ORR) and a lower grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) percentage following systematic chemotherapy, but shared a similar ORR and grade 3–4 TRAE percentage with older adults following targeted therapies. AYAs experienced a shorter progression-free survival time following EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment due to the higher number of metastatic organs at the time of the initial cancer diagnosis. However, there was a survival advantage of AYAs over older adults in terms of the response to systemic chemotherapy, and an age of ˂50 years was indicated as one of the positive predictors for OS time. Overall, AYAs with lung adenocarcinoma harbored distinctive clinical and genomic characteristics, and exhibited PFS and OS disadvantages following first-line EGFR-TKIs and advantages following systematic chemotherapy. However, the age-related difference in prognosis existed solely in patients who received systematic chemotherapy.

Study on efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with regorafenib and PD-1 antibody versus continued TACE combined with regorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after failed second-line treatment with regorafenib.

BackgroundAt present, there is no standard for the posterior treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study isTo evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with regorafenib and anti-PD-1 antibody with continued TACE combined with regorafenib in patients with HCC after the failure of second-line treatment with regorafenib.MethodsWe enrolled patients with advanced HCC who were treated with sorafenib and sequential regorafenib. All patients were treated with TACE and found to have tumor progression in 2021. After tumor progression, patients were treated with TACE combined with regorafenib and PD-1 antibody or with continued TACE combined with regorafenib according to the wishes of the patient. Efficacy was evaluated after 1 month of treatment. The objective response rate (ORR), disease-control rate (DCR), and safety were evaluated according to adverse reactions of patients.ResultsNine patients were treated with TACE combined with regorafenib and PD-1 antibody, and the 9 patients continued to receive TACE combined with regorafenib. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the 2 groups. In the PD-1 group five patients achieved a partial response (PR), three achieved stable disease (SD), and one patient had progressive disease (PD) after 1 month of treatment. The ORR was 55.6% and the DCR was 88.9%. In the continued TACE–regorafenib group, four patients achieved PR, one achieved SD, and four patients achieved PD after 1 month of treatment, while the ORR was 44.4% and the DCR was 55.6%. There was a significant difference in the DCR between the two groups (P=0.012), while adverse events were similar in both.ConclusionsTACE combined with regorafenib and PD-1 antibody had a higher DCR and was more effective than continued TACE combined with regorafenib in patients with HCC who failed second-line treatment with regorafenib. However, PD-1 antibody therapy might increase the risk of death by causing an uncontrollable immune response. Given the risk of an immune response, patients may choose to continue TACE combined with regorafenib, given the similar ORR of the two treatments.