Anybody viewing the footage of the 1953 Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II broadcast in the recent context of her Diamond Jubilee could not have failed to be struck by the archaisms of the ceremony. Indeed, a number of inevitable differences notwithstanding, the format of her coronation was in many respects similar to that prescribed in the Sixth Recension of the Coronation Order, compiled for James II in 1689. There was, however, a significant difference in respect of the regalia delivered to Elizabeth II. After the sword, James II had received: 'Ye Armill (made of Cloth of Tissu, in Modum Stolae) ... deliver'd to ye Dean of Westminster; Who puts it about ye Kings Neck and ties it to ye Bowings of both his Arms above and below ye Elbows wth silk strings: and ye Archbishop saith: Receive this Armill, as a Token of ye divine Mercy.'1 At the equivalent point in her coronation, however, Elizabeth II received not an armill in the form of a stole, but rather armills in the form of a pair of golden bracelets, gifted by the countries of the Commonwealth, which were handed over with the formula: 'Receive the bracelets of sincerity and wisdom.' Why this peculiar change in regalia?The tradition according to which the armills took the form of a stole can be traced back to the third and final form of the Fourth Recension of the Coronation Order, as contained in the Liber regalis, compiled for the coronation of Richard II in 1377. Initially, this Order introduces the armills by reproducing a rubric which had appeared in Coronation Orders since the compilation of the Third Recension nearly 300 years earlier: Accinctus autem ense similiter armillas accipiat, dicente metropolitano uel episcopo: Accipe armillas sinceritatis et sapiencie.'2 Then, however, the Liber regalis departs from its antecedents by including a new instruction regarding what was to be done with these armills: 'Iste quidem armille in modum stole circa collum et ab utraque scapula usque ad compages brachiorum erunt dependentes. In ipsis brachiorum compagibus laqueis sericis connexe prout plenius per ipsarum poterit discerni composicionem.'3 If it is in this new prescription that we recognize the explanation for the stole-armill of James II, in the bracelet-armills of Elizabeth II we find not a wilful innovation, but the restoration of a venerable tradition.4 For while the compilers of the Liber regalis may have been perplexed by the armills,5 no such confusion had been experienced some fifty years earlier by the author of the Anglo-Norman Coronation Order: 'Et puis quant il serra ceynt de l'espee, il rescevera les bracers d'or sur les deux braz, et lui dirra l'ercevesqe: Rescevez les bracers de clerte' (lines 245f.). It is not, however, solely by virtue of such valuable insights into the evolution of coronation regalia that this text merits our attention.6Text, source, and previous editionsThe Anglo-Norman Coronation Order is a prose translation, around 4,300 words in length and probably written around the time of the coronation of Edward III (1327), of the first form of the Fourth Recension of the Coronation Order, presumably compiled shortly before its use in the coronation of Edward II (1308).7 Closely following its Latin source, the Anglo-Norman text prescribes in rich detail all aspects of the ceremony to crown cesti Edward nostre roi, including the people to be involved, the clothes to be worn, the insignia to be conferred, the prayers to be said, and the antiphons to be sung.The Anglo-Norman text is best known to scholarship as one of the documents which records the coronation oath of Edward II.8 Doubtless sworn in French, this oath, presumably upon the insistence of magnates concerned by the prospect of Edward II's reign, introduced a new clause, the so-called 'fourth clause', in which the king had to grant and promise to keep and defend the laws and customs that the people of his realm would choose, as well as anything else reasonable that the people might wish to add (lines 68-74 of the present edition). …