Silicone Hydrogel Bandage Contact Lenses Research Articles

Comparison of efficacy of two different silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses after T-PRK.

To compare the efficacy between two different silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK). In this randomized controlled trial, a total of 89 patients (178 eyes) who underwent T-PRK at the Qingdao Eye Hospital from October to December 2019 were selected. One random eye wore a Senofilcon A bandage contact lens after surgery, and the other eye a Balafilcon A bandage contact lens. Pain scores, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), spherical equivalent (SE), corneal epithelial healing status, epithelial thickness, bandage lenses deposits, lenses movement, and ocular surface conditions were measured and compared. There were no differences between the two groups in UCVA, SE, corneal epithelial healing status, corneal epithelial thickness, tear river heights and tear film rupture time at each follow-up visit. However, postoperative pain scores in the Senofilcon A group were significantly lower than those of the Balafilcon A group (F intergroups=67.833, P<0.001; F time=383.773, P<0.001; F interaction=57.344, P<0.001). The duration of pain in eyes in the Senofilcon A group was shorter than that of the Balafilcon A group (t=-3.326, P=0.001). The surface deposition scores and movement scores of Senofilcon A bandage lenses on the first and fourth days after surgery were lower than those of Balafilcon A bandage lenses (Z=-5.385, -6.782, P<0.001; Z=-8.336, -8.906, P<0.001). Both Senofilcon A and Balafilcon A bandage lenses have good efficacy after T-PRK. Senofilcon A lenses are associated with less pain and more comfort compared to Balafilcon A.

Comparison of the efficacy of lotrafilcon B and comfilcon A silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy.

At completion of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (t-PRK) surgery, the eye is usually fitted with a bandage contact lens to reduce discomfort and promote epithelial healing. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of eyes fitted with lotrafilcon B versus comfilcon A, silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses after t-PRK for the correction of low to moderate myopia, with or without astigmatism. In this comparative, prospective study, patients with myopia < -6 D with or without astigmatism (< 1.75 D), who underwent t-PRK between January and June 2018, were randomly allocated to the lotrafilcon B and comfilcon A groups. Preoperative characteristics, including age, sex, eye treated, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity, mesopic pupil size, central corneal thickness, and refractive error were recorded. Postoperatively, pain score, UCVA, and corneal epithelial defect size on days 1, 4, and 7 were compared between the two groups. Twenty-nine eyes were included in each group. Demographic characteristics and preoperative measurements were similar between the two groups. UCVA was significantly improved on day 7 as compared to day 1 in the comfilcon A group (P = 0.03), but remained the same in the lotrafilcon B group (P = 0.70) as on day 1 postoperatively. There was no significant difference in UCVA between the two groups at any follow-up visits (all P > 0.05). The pain score on the first postoperative day was significantly higher in the lotrafilcon B-fitted eyes than in the comfilcon A group (P < 0.001), but was significantly reduced in both groups compared to day 1 (both P < 0.001). The epithelial defect in the comfilcon A group was significantly greater than in the lotrafilcon B group (P < 0.001) at day 1 postoperatively, with significant improvement in both groups (both P < 0.001). Healing responses were better with lotrafilcon B than with comfilcon A bandage contact lenses. The patients had a greater mean pain score with lotrafilcon B than with comfilcon A lenses on the first postoperative day, yet the final outcome was comparable between the two groups. We did not encounter any postoperative complications related to contact lens wear.

Efficacy of two silicone-hydrogel bandage contact lenses after corneal crosslinking

ABSTRACT Silicone-hydrogel (SiH) contact lenses are frequently used as a bandage after anterior segment surgical procedures. Several types of lenses may exhibit clinical performances with different characteristics. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two SiH contact lenses following corneal crosslinking (CXL). Forty-nine keratoconus patients scheduled for consecutive CXL surgery in both eyes were included in this comparative, double-blind, prospective study. A Balafilcon A (Pure Vision 2 HD, Bausch+Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) or Lotrafilcon B (Air Optix Aqua, Ciba Vision, Duluth, GA, USA) lens was fitted in a randomised fashion in the eyes at the end of the CXL. Remaining epithelial defect area measured by slitlamp biomicroscopy, subjective level of pain and discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS) and total number of oral analgesics taken were evaluated and compared at post-operative days 0, 1, 2 and 3. The average epithelial defect size was significantly smaller in the eyes with Lotrafilcon B than the eyes with Balafilcon A at post-operative Day 1 (31.2 ± 4.3 mm2 and 33.8 ± 5.2 mm2, respectively, p < 0.001) and Day 2 (8.2 ± 3.6 mm2 and 10.5 ± 5.4 mm2, respectively, p = 0.039). There was no statistically significant in the average epithelial defect size between the groups at Day 3 (p = 0.859). Re-epithelialisation time was similar in both groups (p = 0.317) There was no statistically significant difference in VAS scores regarding the lens type in any post-operative follow-up. The mean oral analgesic numbers were similar in both groups (p = 0.217). SiH contact lenses can be used as an effective bandage for corneal re-epithelialisation after CXL. The material and features of bandage contact lens used after CXL may affect the corneal re-epithelialisation process. Lotrafilcon B lens showed faster re-epithelialisation at post-operative days 1 and 2 after CXL.

Clinical Observation of Silicon Hydrogel Contact Lens Fitted Immediately after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).

Purpose To examine the immediate use of bandage contact lenses (BCLs) for improving patient comfort after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. Methods This is a prospective randomized controlled study in which one hundred and seventy-eight patients undergoing SMILE were randomly allocated to three groups: group A wore BCLs for 8 hours postsurgery, group B wore BCLs for 24 hours postsurgery, and group C did not wear any BCLs postsurgery. Eight subjective symptoms including photophobia, tearing, pain, foreign body sensation, burning, blurred vision, sting, and dry eyes were prospectively evaluated at 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours, using a questionnaire with a total score of 24. The scores of symptoms and signs were compared between the three groups. Results There was a statistically significant time effect on scoring, which implicated a decline in symptoms over time after surgery (P < 0.001). There was also a significant interaction between time and the treatment group (P < 0.01). The total symptom score of groups A and B (5.85 ± 3.97 and 5.99 ± 4.67, respectively) was significantly lower than that of group C at 2 hours postsurgery (7.35 ± 4.86, P < 0.05), especially in tearing and pain (P < 0.05). The level of corneal oedema at 24 hours postsurgery was also statistically significantly different between the three groups (P < 0.001), and the post hoc test showed that groups A and B were lower than group C (P < 0.01). Conclusion Silicon hydrogel BCLs applied immediately after SMILE surgery can relieve postsurgical symptoms of tearing and pain, improving overall patient comfort, and reduce corneal oedema. This trial is registered with ChiCTR-ONRC-13003114. Precis. The application of silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses immediately after SMILE surgery has the potential to improve patient comfort, corneal healing, and patient satisfaction following SMILE.

Masked comparison of two silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy

PurposeTo compare the efficiency and safety of two bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). MethodsIn this double-blind study, 45 patients (90 eyes) received PRK in both eyes and wore bandage contact lenses (BCLs), PureVision (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) in one eye and PureVision2 (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) in the other eye, randomly assigned. The medication regimen after surgery was the same for both eyes. The epithelial defect's size, conjunctival hyperemia and lens centration were graded objectively using slit-lamp biomicroscopy on days 1, 3 and 5 after surgery. Also ocular symptoms of discomfort including tearing, photophobia, foreign body sensation and visual fluctuations were assessed subjectively at each visit. ResultsThe mean epithelial defect size on the first day after operation was similar in eyes fitted with PureVision (30.08 ± 5.30 mm²) and PureVision2 (30.25 ± 5.72 mm2) lenses. (p = 0.79) Contact lens deposits and bulbar hyperaemia on days 1 and 3 after PRK were similar between the two eyes, but were significantly greater on day 5 for PureVision2 lenses. (p = 0.02; p = 0.04 respectively) There was no difference in contact lens decentration, and discomfort symptoms including pain, tearing, foreign body sensation, photophobia and visual fluctuations between the eyes fitted with PureVision and PureVision2. (p > 0.05) ConclusionsPureVision and PureVision2 contact lenses are equivalent as bandage lenses in important aspects such as corneal re-epithelialization and subjective comfort., although PureVision2 led to a higher incidence of contact lens deposits and conjunctival hyperemia early post-PRK.

Comparison of the Lotrafilcon B and Comfilcon A Silicone Hydrogel Bandage Contact Lens on Postoperative Ocular Discomfort After Photorefractive Keratectomy.

To compare the lotrafilcon B and comfilcon A silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). One hundred twenty eyes of 60 patients who underwent PRK were included in this randomized clinical trial study. In the end of the surgery, the lotrafilcon B (Air Optix; Ciba Vision, Duluth, GA) was used in one eye and the comfilcon A (Biofinity; Coopervision, Fairport, NY) was used in the fellow eye randomly. Pain and discomfort were assessed on the first and third day after surgery by visual analogue scale. The mean pain score was 3.75±3.32 and 4.47±3.60 on the first day (P=0.253) and 3.63±3.48 and 4.16±3.60 on the third day (P=0.416) after the use of the lotrafilcon B and comfilcon A, respectively. The results showed no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.823). The mean score of foreign body sensation was 4.31±3.38 and 5.49±3.04 on the first day (P=0.045) and 4.44±3.34 and 5.13±3.23 on the third day (P=0.250) after the use of the lotrafilcon B and comfilcon A, respectively. The comfilcon A lens caused a more severe foreign body sensation only on the first day. There was no significant difference in photophobia, epiphora, and blurred vision between the two lenses (P>0.05). Both lotrafilcon B and comfilcon A silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses reduce clinical symptoms after PRK effectively. We found no difference in pain control and discomfort between them. However, the patients using the lotrafilcon B lens showed less foreign body sensation on the first day postoperatively.

Comparison of Lotrafilcon B and Balafilcon A silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses in reducing pain and discomfort after photorefractive keratectomy: A contralateral eye study.

To assess the effect of two silicone hydrogel contact lenses with high oxygen permeability in patients having photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Sixty patients (120 eyes) who had bilateral PRK were enrolled in this double blind clinical trial. Each patient was fitted with a Lotrafilcon B (Air Optix(®)AQUA, Ciba Vision, Duluth, GA, USA) lens in one eye and a Balafilcon A (PureVision™ Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) lens in the fellow eye. Patients' responses to a subjective questionnaire in terms of pain, foreign body sensation, photophobia, blurred vision and epiphora were evaluated on the first and third postoperative days. Mean pain score for Lotrafilcon B and Balafilcon A contact lenses was 4.43±3.18 vs. 5.45±3.37 on the first postoperative day and 3.43±3.23 vs. 3.88±3.01 on the third postoperative day. However, the difference was only significant in the first 24h after surgery (P=0.032). Foreign body sensation was clinically higher with Balafilcon A contact lens (5.0±3.47 vs. 4.08±3.34 on day 1 and 4.98±3.52 vs. 3.55±3.20 on day 3) and the difference was statistically significant on the first and the third postoperative days (P=0.042 and 0.002, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between two contact lenses in terms of photophobia, epiphora and blurred vision (P>0.05). The Lotrafilcon B lens resulted in significantly less postoperative pain and discomfort after PRK, especially in the first 24h after PRK.

Kornea Kroslink Sonrası Kullanılan İki Farklı Tip Bandaj Kontakt Lensin Karşılaştırılması

Objective: To compare the efficiacy of two types of silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses (BCLs) after corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) in keratoconus patients. Material and Methods: In this prospective study, 36 keratoconus patients received CXL in both eye. Each patient received a BCL composed of balafilcon A (Pure Vision; Bauch&Lomb) (14.0 diameter, 8.6 base curve) in 1 eye and lotrafilcon B (Air Optix Aqua; Ciba Vision) (14.2 diameter, 8.6 base curve) in the fellow eye. Patients were masked to the lens type in each eye. Postoperative medication regimen was the same with both eye. Epithelial defect size, contact lens debris, conjunctival and limbal hyperemia, reepithelization and responses to a subjective-comfort questionnaire were assessed postoperatively at 1, 3, and 5 days. A paired Student's t test and chi-square tests were used when appropriate. Results: Seventy-two eyes of 36 keratoconus patients who underwent CXL were analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference in epithelial defect size, conjunctival or limbal hyperemia between the 2 lenses at any postoperative visit. Three days postoperatively, re-epithelization was complete in 77.8% of eyes (28 eyes) in the balafilcon A group and 83.3% of the eyes (30 eyes) in the lotrafilcon B group. Lens deposition and patient discomfort was significantly higher with the balafilcon A group 5 days postoperatively (p<0.01 for both comparisons). Conclusion: There were no differences in corneal re-epithelization between the 2 types of BCLs (p>0.01). However, lens deposition and patient discomfort was higher with balafilcon A (p<0.01).

Monitor corneal epithelial healing under bandage contact lens using ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography after pterygium surgery.

To monitor corneal epithelial healing under bandage contact lens (BCL) using ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography (UHR-OCT) after pterygium surgery. Thirty-nine eyes of 39 patients undergoing pterygium excision and conjunctival autografting were randomly allocated into 2 groups: 20 eyes were covered with silicone hydrogel BCLs at the end of surgery and 19 eyes served as a control. Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography scans of the cornea were performed sequentially at 1, 2, and 3 days, and then every other day until the end of re-epithelialization after surgery. Complete epithelial healing was verified with fluorescein staining examination after removal of BCLs. Postsurgery pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale. All BCLs were successfully fit without any contact lens-related complications. Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence images clearly revealed the architectural features of postoperative cornea with BCL in situ and showed epithelial healing process. Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography imaging agreed with the fluorescein staining examinations in detecting corneal epithelial defect. Based on the assessment by UHR-OCT, the average time course of re-epithelialization in the BCL group was 3.9±1.2 days, whereas in the control group, it was 5.7±1.8 days (P=0.001). Visual analog scale scoring showed lower pain levels in the BCL group comparing with the control group at each point of time (all P<0.05). Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography is an excellent tool in monitoring corneal epithelial healing under BCLs and determining the appropriate time for lens removal. Silicone hydrogel BCL is recommended as an adjuvant therapy after pterygium surgery for its efficacy in improving re-epithelialization and postoperative comfort.

Efficacy of 2 types of silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy

To compare the efficacy of 2 types of silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses with high oxygen transmissibility after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Institute of Vision and Optics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. In this prospective study, 1 eye of patients having bilateral PRK was randomly fitted with a bandage contact lens of lotrafilcon A (Night & Day) and the fellow eye, with a bandage contact lens of lotrafilcon B (O(2)Optix). The patients and the examiner were masked to which bandage contact lens type was in which eye. Patients were examined on the day of surgery and 1, 3, and 5 days postoperatively. Postoperative examinations included uncorrected distance visual acuity and slitlamp biomicroscopy to assess epithelial defect size. Subjective evaluation of pain and vision was recorded 1, 2, 3, and 4 days postoperatively. The study enrolled 44 patients (88 eyes). The mean epithelial defect size immediately after surgery was 47.0 mm(2) with both types of bandage contact lenses. There was no statistically significant difference in epithelial defect size between the 2 lenses at any postoperative visit. Three days postoperatively, reepithelialization was complete in 75.0% of eyes in the lotrafilcon A group and 72.7% of the eyes in the lotrafilcon B group. There were no differences in corneal reepithelialization or subjective measurements after PRK between the 2 types of silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses.

Comparison of Hydrogel and Silicone Hydrogel Bandage Contact Lens after LASEK

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness between wearing a conventional hydrogel vifilcon A bandage contact lens (BCL) and a silicone hydrogel lotrafilcon A BCL after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). Methods: LASEK was performed on 38 eyes of 19 patients. Each patient was fitted with a silicone hydrogel lotrafilcon A lens in one eye and a conventional hydrogel vifilcon A lens in the other eye. The patient was masked on the type of lens in each eye. General preference between the two types of lenses, subjective symptoms (pain, photophobia, tearing, dryness, and foreign body sensation; graded as 0 to 4), and the area of non-viable corneal epithelium were assessed in each eye at one and four days after surgery. Results: Patients reported preferring the lotrafilcon A lens to vifilcon A at 1 (79%) and 4 (74%) days after LASEK. The mean symptom scores of tearing and foreign body sensation at 1 day after surgery (P=0.012 and P=0.034, respectively) and foreign body sensation at 4 days after surgery (P=0.027) were significantly lower in the lotrafilcon A group. The mean area of the non-viable corneal epithelium was smaller in the lotrafilcon A lens group at 1 day and 4 days after surgery, although not statistically significant. Conclusions: Patients better tolerated the silicone hydrogel lotrafilcon A BCL compared with the conventional hydrogel vifilcon A BCL. The mean symptom scores were significantly lower in the lotrafilcon A group at both 1 and 4 days after LASEK.

Comparison of Conventional and Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses for Bullous Keratoplasty

To compare the efficacy and safety of conventional lenses and silicone hydrogel lenses in the treatment of bullous keratopathy. The silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses used were Focus NIGHT & DAY and PureVision. The conventional lens used was Sauflon 85%. This was a prospective, comparative study of 22 patients with painful bullous keratopathy in one eye. Patients visited a specialty contact lens department and were fitted with all three different lens types in their affected eye for 1 month each, for a total duration of 3 months. The main outcome measures were comfort and pain relief, which patients scored on a scale that ranged from 1 to 5, with 1 being very poor and 5 being excellent. Doctors assessed the fit of the lens, its movement, and any deposit buildup. The statistical tests applied were the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney test. Sixteen of the 22 patients (24 eyes) successfully completed 1 month's wear of all three bandage contact lenses. The median comfort score was 3.9 for PureVision, 3.8 for Focus NIGHT & DAY, and 2.8 for Sauflon 85%; there was a statistical significance among the three groups (P=0.031). Silicone hydrogel lenses performed better than conventional lenses for comfort. The Mann-Whitney test showed that there was no statistically significant difference for comfort scores of Focus NIGHT & DAY versus PureVision (P<0.782) or of Focus NIGHT & DAY versus Sauflon 85% (P<0.073). However, there was a statistically significant difference for comfort scores of PureVision versus Sauflon 85% (P<0.0136). The median pain relief score was 3.8 for PureVision, 3.7 for Focus NIGHT & DAY, and 3.2 for Sauflon 85%. There was no significant difference among the three lenses for pain relief score. All three lens types were similarly good with regard to contact lens fit, movement, and deposit buildup. The use of silicone hydrogel lenses are a safe and effective alternative to conventional contact lenses for the treatment of bullous keratopathy.