A multifaceted study compared transgingival (flapless) implant placement with conventional flapped placement, which employed clinical, radiographic, biochemical, and patient-centered parameters. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and was conducted according to the ethical standards in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. Seventy-five implants were placed, 37 by flapless method (group 1) and 38 by flapped method (group 2). The Group 1 subjects underwent flapless implant placement, while Group 2 underwent flapped implant placement. The modified plaque index was significantly higher in group 2 at 6 weeks (Mann Whitney test, z = -3.08, p = .002). Modified sulcus bleeding index was also significantly higher in group 2, up to the 12-week follow-up (Mann Whitney test, z = -4.63, p < .001). Crestal bone loss revealed no significant intergroup difference. Under biochemical evaluation, matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) was significantly higher in flapped implants up to the 6-week follow-up. The patient-reported questionnaire-based acceptability assessment showed that the flapless technique is better regarding the perceived duration of the surgery and post-operative comfort.
Read full abstract