Significant Improvement In Overall Survival Research Articles

Advancing hepatocellular carcinoma treatment with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major challenge in oncology, being a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early-stage HCC is typically treated with surgical resection, transplantation, or ablation, while advanced-stage HCC relies on systemic therapies like sorafenib and newer combinations such as atezolizumab-bevacizumab. Despite these advancements, there is still a need for effective treatments for unresectable HCC, especially in cases with macroscopic vascular invasion. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has demonstrated promising outcomes in Asia for the treatment of unresectable HCC, yet its application in Western countries has been relatively limited. This letter reviews the recent meta-analysis by Zhou et al published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology , which demonstrates the efficacy and safety of HAIC vs sorafenib. The analysis includes 9 randomized controlled trials and 35 cohort studies, highlighting significant improvements in overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rates with HAIC and its combinations. The editorial explores the reasons behind the limited use of HAIC in Western countries. It underscores the potential of HAIC to enhance treatment outcomes for advanced HCC and calls for more research and broader adoption of HAIC in clinical practice globally.

Emerging paradigm: Molecularly targeted therapy with Dabrafenib and Trametinib in recurring pediatric gliomas with BRAF mutations: A narrative review.

Gliomas are tumors arising in the central nervous system, frequently associated with Class I mutations and BRAF fusions. These mutations are adverse prognostic factors in juvenile gliomas, leading to high rates of recurrence and poor response to current treatments. The blood-brain barrier and the heterogeneity of gliomas complicate the development of a single treatment strategy for all cases. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapies, particularly Dabrafenib and Trametinib, in pediatric gliomas with BRAF V600 mutations and discusses their potential in improving clinical outcomes. A review of recent clinical trials was conducted to assess the impact of targeted therapies, especially the combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib, on glioma treatment outcomes. Additional therapies are also explored. Combination therapy with Dabrafenib, a BRAF kinase inhibitor, and Trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, has shown significant improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival for pediatric patients with BRAF V600-mutant gliomas. Recent clinical data from 2023 demonstrated enhanced tumor control, reduced relapse rates, and improved safety profiles compared to conventional therapies. Dabrafenib and Trametinib offer a promising targeted therapy for juvenile gliomas with BRAF V600 mutations, with better survival outcomes and manageable safety profiles. However, challenges remain in managing side effects such as fever, headache, lethargy, and rash. Further research into resistance mechanisms and long-term effects is necessary to optimize treatment strategies. Other therapies, such as everolimus and Selumetinib, also show potential and warrant further investigation.

Real-World Survival Outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Impact of Genomic Testing and Targeted Therapies in a Latin American Middle-Income Country.

Targeted therapies are indicated for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and driver tumor mutations. However, real-world studies on the survival benefits of these agents are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of targeted therapies matched to a genomic alteration on the survival of patients with NSCLC. This retrospective study included 446 patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent next-generation sequencing between 2016 and 2023 at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Mexico. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). For the entire cohort, the PFS and OS were 10.71 months (95% CI, 9.35 to 12.06) and 47.77 months (95% CI, 29.67 to 65.86). PFS was significantly longer in patients with actionable mutations treated with targeted therapies (19.41 months [95% CI, 14.27 to 24.55]; P < .001) than in patients without actionable mutations (6.4 months [95% CI, 4.4 to 8.4]) or not treated with targeted therapies (6.6 months [95% CI, 5.3 to 7.89]). Similarly, OS was significantly longer in patients with actionable mutations treated with targeted therapies (89.69 months [95% CI, 45.54 to 133.84]; P < .001) than in patients without actionable mutations (17.11 months [95% CI, 8.65 to 25.57]) or not treated with targeted therapies (22.3 months [95% CI, 12.48 to 32.1]). Survival gains were driven by significant improvements in PFS and OS in patients with EGFR and ALK mutations. This real-world data analysis demonstrated that targeted therapies improve the survival of patients with NSCLC with actionable mutations, which supports a recommendation for widening access to broad-based genomic testing and targeted therapies.

Analysis of linear accelerator-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in brain metastases: efficacy, safety, and dose tolerances

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of linear accelerator-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (LINAC-FSRT) in patients with brain metastases (BM).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 214 patients treated with LINAC-FSRT, categorized based on biologically effective dose (BED10, α/β = 10) into two groups (≤55 Gy, &amp;gt;55 Gy). Stratified analyses were conducted based on targeted therapy to compare survival outcomes. To examine brain tissue dose-tolerance volume, patients were divided into two groups: the standard Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) protocol group and an adjusted HyTEC protocol group where dose-volume restrictions exclude the planning target volume (PTV).ResultsResults as of December 2023 showed median intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) at 12.4 months, with median overall survival (OS) not reached and a one-year local control (LC) rate of 68.7%. Mild to moderate toxicity affected 17.3% of patients, while severe toxicity occurred in 2.8%. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that uncontrolled extracranial disease significantly reduced iPFS (HR = 2.692, 95%CI:1.880–3.853, P &amp;lt; 0.001) and OS (HR = 3.063, 95%CI:1.987–4.722, P &amp;lt; 0.001). BED10 &amp;gt;55 Gy (HR = 0.656, 95%CI:0.431–0.998, P = 0.049) improved OS, showing statistical significance (P = 0.037) without affecting iPFS or CNS toxicity (P = 0.127, P = 0.091). Stratified analysis highlighted nearly significant OS improvements with high-dose FSRT and targeted therapy (P = 0.054), while concurrent therapy markedly enhanced iPFS (P = 0.027). No significant differences were observed in intracranial local failure (ILF—which represents progression in previously treated areas during follow-up), one-year LC rates, iPFS, or OS between dose-volume groups. Adjusting HyTEC volume restrictions did not significantly increase CNS adverse reactions (P = 0.889).ConclusionsLINAC-FSRT is safe and effective in BM. BED10&amp;gt;55 Gy notably enhances OS post-LINAC-FSRT and may benefit LC. High BED10 FSRT with targeted therapy likely boosts synergy, and concurrent targeted therapy significantly improves iPFS. Diminishing dose volume constraints at different fractions based on the HyTEC guidelines is feasible.

Early Palliative Care in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

This study aims to assess the efficacy of Early Palliative Care (EPC) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a meta-analysis approach. A computerized search was conducted in databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the application of EPC in advanced NSCLC. Outcome measures including Overall Survival (OS), quality of life, and psychological status were extracted and subjected to pooled analysis. After the computerized search, a total of 7 studies comprising 1185 participants were included, with 597 patients receiving EPC intervention and 588 patients receiving Standard Care (SC) intervention. Three studies reported OS after the intervention, demonstrating a significant improvement in OS for patients receiving EPC (pooled HR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.22, 1.98). Five studies analyzed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scores after the intervention, revealing a significant improvement in FACT scores for patients receiving EPC (pooled SMD = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.31). No significant differences were found in anxiety and depression scores between the 2 interventions in the 5 studies. In advanced NSCLC, EPC provides benefits in terms of increased survival rates and improved quality of life. EPC should be considered as part of multidisciplinary treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Evidence of clinical benefit of cancer medicines considered for funding in Australia.

To describe the type of evidence and the clinical benefit of cancer medicines assessed for funding in Australia by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) and to assess it with the European Society of Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS). All data on applications submitted to PBAC between 2010 and 2020 were extracted from PBAC Public Summary Documents available online. ESMO-MCBS ratings were retrieved from the ESMO-MCBS website. Then, 182 cancer indications for 100 cancer medicines were examined by PBAC, including 124 (68.1 percent) for solid tumors and 58 (31.9 percent) for hematological cancers. A total of 137 (75.3 percent) indications were recommended for PBS funding and 40 (21.9 percent) were rejected. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were the main source of evidence in 154 indications (84.6 percent), single-arm studies in 28 (15.4 percent) indications. Statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) was reported in 80 (44 percent) of the indications, with a median OS gain of 3.0months (range 0.9-17.0) for solid tumors and 8.2months (range 1-49.1) for hematological cancers when mature OS data were available. The ESMO-MCBS score was available for 99 solid tumor indications, of which 51 (51.5 percent) showed substantial clinical benefit according to ESMO-MCBS, including 40 (54.1 percent) of PBAC-recommended indications and 9 (42.9 percent) of PBAC-rejected indications. There was no association between the ESMO scoring and PBAC decision. Most cancer medicines indications considered by PBAC were supported by RCTs. A minority showed a substantial improvement in OS.

Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy as a First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have poor prognoses and unmet medical needs. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy (EP) vs placebo plus EP as a first-line treatment for patients with ES-SCLC. This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 randomized clinical trial (EXTENTORCH study) enrolled patients from September 26, 2019, to May 20, 2021, and was conducted at 49 sites in China. Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC without previous systemic antitumor therapy for ES-SCLC. Data were analyzed between May 6, 2023, and June 1, 2024. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab, 240 mg, or placebo plus EP every 3 weeks for up to 4 to 6 cycles, followed by maintenance with toripalimab or placebo until disease progression, intolerable toxic effects, or up to 2 years of treatment. The primary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Whole-exome sequencing results identified correlative biomarkers for clinical efficacy. Among 595 screened patients, 442 eligible patients were randomized (median [range] age, 63 [30-77] years; 366 [82.8%] male); 223 patients were randomized to toripalimab plus EP, and 219 to placebo plus EP. By April 20, 2023, the median (range) survival follow-up was 13.7 (0.0-42.7) months. Compared with placebo, toripalimab improved investigator-assessed PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.54-0.82]; P < .001), and significantly reduced the risk of death (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65-0.98]; P = .03). The median OS was 14.6 (95% CI, 12.9-16.6) months in the toripalimab group vs 13.3 (95% CI, 11.8-14.4) months in the placebo group. Whole-exome sequencing results from 300 patients identified low intratumor heterogeneity, HLA-A11+ HLA-B62- haplotype, wild-type KMT2D and COL4A4, or sequence variations in CTNNA2 or SCN4A correlated with favorable PFS and OS in the toripalimab group. No new safety signals were observed. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse event incidence was similar between the toripalimab and placebo safety set groups (199 of 222 patients [89.6%] vs 193 of 216 patients [89.4%], respectively). In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, adding toripalimab to first-line chemotherapy demonstrated significant improvements in PFS and OS for patients with ES-SCLC. The treatment exhibited an acceptable safety profile, supporting this combination regimen as a new treatment option for patients with ES-SCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04012606.

Role of consolidative thoracic and prophylactic cranial radiation in extensive stage small cell lung cancer in chemo-immunotherapy era

IntroductionThe role of consolidative thoracic and prophylactic brain radiation for extensive stage small cell lung cancer patients is controversial. We investigated the factors associated with the use of any radiation therapy (RT) and whether RT has a benefit to overall survival (OS) in patients receiving any systemic therapy and whether this benefit is the same if Chemotherapy (CT) or chemo-immunotherapy (CT-IO) is used. Material/MethodsThe NCDB database was queried from years 2017–2019. Patients receiving systemic therapy- STX (CT or CT-IO) had to have at least 6 months of follow-up and have no brain metastases at diagnosis. All RT patients had to receive upfront systemic therapy, be treated 2–6 months from diagnosis, and if treated to the brain received 25 Gy in 10 fractions only. Multi-variable analyses (MVA) were used to determine factors associated with OS and selection for any radiation. Propensity matching for factors affecting OS were used to generate Kaplan-Meier OS curves. Log-rank tests were used to determine differences in Kaplan Meier survival curves for the effects of RT on OS. ResultsThe total number of patients receiving RT/STX or STX alone as well as their median follow-up (months) were (890, 17.0 mn) and (6898, 14.0mn). The median time to the start of STX and RT were 22.9 days and 152 days, respectively. MVA noted that RT had a greater effect on OS (Thorax, Brain, Both Brain/Thorax – HRs = 0.80, 0.77, 0.70) than other interventions including IO (HR 0.87) and palliative care without RT (HR 1.06). Selection for radiation depended significantly upon factors affecting OS (HR) including lack of liver metastases, females, age and Charlson co-morbidity index, but did not depend upon insurance status, race, or county income/high school graduation rates. Propensity-score matched OS curves noted the same significant effects of RT on OS in those receiving CT +/- IO, CT-IO, and CT alone with HRs of 0.68/0.68/0.68 for thoracic RT, 0.72/0.72/0.70 for brain RT, and 0.60/0.60/0.60 for brain/thoracic RT, respectively. ConclusionsThe patient with extensive stage small cell lung cancer who reach candidacy and receive RT may have a significant improvement in OS compared to the patients treated only with CT or CT-IO. Combined thoracic and prophylactic brain RT seems to be better than either one alone. The impact of radiation whether given to one or two sites may be more beneficial than immunotherapy added to chemotherapy.

A 14-year retrospective of HER2 + metastatic breast cancer treatment at one comprehensive cancer center: Impact of the trastuzumab/pertuzumab and trastuzumab-emtansine sequence versus trastuzumab on overall survival.

Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies represent a significant improvement in the treatment of the HER2 + metastatic cancer, which is associated with a worse prognosis. The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) data in patients treated with trastuzumab + pertuzumab followed by trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) in the second line of metastatic treatment (Arm A) versus patients treated with trastuzumab alone (Arm B). Progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line metastatic patients was also compared in both arms. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients from February 2008 to August 2022. OS and PFS of both arms were described and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and CHIMIO prescribing software. Results: The total duration of metastatic treatment of the 82 patients was significantly longer in the arm A (43.2 ± 28 months vs 33.6 ± 28.9 months), as was the median time to death (59 vs 52 months). The OS data showed a significant reduction in the risk of death in the arm A (Hazard Ratio = 0.59; 95% Confidence Interval [0.37-0.94]; p = 0.02). No difference was shown for PFS. Conclusion: The trastuzumab/pertuzumab/T-DM1 combination showed a significant improvement in OS. Our results are in line with the CLEOPATRA and EMILIA studies, but long-term responders in the arm A may have impacted our results. The absence of difference in term of PFS in first metastatic line may be explained by a selection bias, as patients in the arm A potentially have more aggressive forms.

Efficacy and safety of second‑generation FLT3 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is one of the most frequent forms of acute leukemia and the second most common leukemia subtype in adults. In 2020, the incidence of AML in the United States was estimated to be ~4 cases per 100,000 adults. The FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) internal tandem duplication (ITD) and tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutation are major prognostic indicators of AML. They are more frequently observed in younger AML patients (aged <60 years), likely due to their association with de novo. Additionally, these mutations have a stronger negative impact on survival in younger patients. Therefore, quizartinib and gilteritinib are second-generation FLT3 inhibitors that are frequently applied for treating patients with AML. However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have compared the efficacy of second-generation FLT3 inhibitors for AML treatment. Therefore, the present study conducted a comprehensive search for studies on the efficacy and safety of FLT3 inhibitors across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov. The search criteria were limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Subsequently, a meta-analysis was performed on a total of five randomized controlled trials, involving 1,543 participants in total, using a random-effects model. In each RCT, compared to the salvage chemotherapy used in the control group, the groups that received second-generation FLT3 inhibitors experienced significant improvements in overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.717; 95% CI, 0.604-0.850; P<0.001). In addition, overall survival was found to be consistent across the different types of second-generation FLT3 inhibitors used and different types of AML. The risks associated with a prolonged heart-rate corrected QT interval (QTc) interval were next evaluated. Compared with the salvage chemotherapy used in the control group, the second-generation FLT3 inhibitor group exhibited a significantly higher risk of having a prolonged QTc interval (odds ratio, 6.311; 95% CI, 3.061-13.013; P<0.001). In conclusion, these findings suggest that second-generation FLT3 inhibitors can improve the overall survival of patients with AML. However, QTc prolongation is a potential adverse effect that should be monitored.

Spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma treatment experiences - a 20-year retrospective study from databases of two medical centers

The research retrospectively analyzed cases of spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma involving patients who received treatment at the two hospitals between 2001 and 2023. Among the 48 patients studied (39 chordoma and 9 chondrosarcoma cases), the average age was 53.9 ± 15.8 years, with a range of 17 to 86 years. Out of these patients, 43 underwent excision surgery and were categorized based on tumor margin into negative (R0) or microscopically positive (R1) margin (n = 14) and macroscopically positive (R2) margin (n = 29) groups. The mean overall survival (OS) for R0/R1 and R2 groups was 156.5 ± 19.3 and 79.2 ± 11.9 months, respectively (p value = 0.012). The mean progression-free survival (PFS) for R0/R1 and R2 was 112.9 ± 24.4 and 25.5 ± 5.5 months (p value < 0.001). The study showed that regardless of whether patients in the R0/R1 or R2 groups received radiation therapy (RT) or not, there was no significant improvement in OS or PFS. Specifically, the OS and PFS for the RT only group were 75.9 ± 16.6 and 73.3 ± 18.0 months. In conclusion, the recommended treatment approach for spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma remains en bloc resection surgery with an appropriate margin. Patients who are unsuitable for or decline surgery may find a beneficial disease control rate with traditional external beam photon/proton therapy.

First-line treatment of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluates first-line treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. We analyzed 24 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2,682 patients, comparing various EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and combination therapies. Direct comparisons showed that the addition of bevacizumab or chemotherapy to first-generation (1G) EGFR-TKIs improved overall survival (OS) compared to 1G TKIs alone, with HRs of 0.704 (95% CI: 0.433–0.973) and 0.682 (95% CI: 0.464–0.899), respectively. However, third-generation (3G) TKI monotherapy did not significantly improve OS compared with 1G TKIs, with an HR of 0.855 (95% CI: 0.511–1.198). Indirect comparisons suggested that the combination of 3G TKIs with chemotherapy provided the most significant improvements in OS and progression-free survival (PFS), significantly outperforming 3G TKIs, with HRs of OS 1.69 (95% CI: 1.14–3.4) and PFS 2.13 (95% CI: 1.28–3.54). Intracranial PFS was best with 1G TKIs plus bevacizumab. Our findings suggest that 3G EGFR-TKIs in combination with chemotherapy may be the most effective strategy for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and brain metastases, though further head-to-head trials are needed for validation.

Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Male Breast Cancer in Brazil: A Large Population-Based Study

AimsThis study evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment trends, and overall survival (OS) in male breast cancer (BC) in Sao Paulo State of Brazil. Materials and methodsMen diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between January 2000 and June 2020 were identified from Fundação Oncocentro de Sao Paulo database encompasses data pertinent to 46 million residents of the Sao Paulo State of Brazil. Patients were described according to age, education level, clinical stage, treatment modalities, and medical practice. Categorical variables were described as percentages and frequencies. Demographic, treatment factors, and OS were associated using a Cox proportional hazard regression model while accounting for different lengths of participant follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier curves were used to display survival curves. ResultsA total of 907 male BC patients were included. The age distribution at diagnosis was <51 years, 51–70 years, and >70 years in 21.5%, 51.5% and 27.0% of patients, respectively. The proportions of stages I, II, III, and IV were 19.5%, 36.6%, 31.5%, and 12.3%. For each stage I, II, III, and IV, 5- and 10-years OS were 87.9% and 77.8%, 79.9% and 58.9%, 51.6% and 24.5%, 20.0% and 5.6%, respectively. Patients who received postoperative radiotherapy experienced a significant improvement in OS (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.53–0.84; p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis adjusted for practice (public or private), education (low or medium/high), age, stage at diagnosis, and treatment modalities, the significant independent predictor for OS was stage at diagnosis. ConclusionMale BC tends to be diagnosed at a more advanced stage and older age at the time of diagnosis. Age and educational level did not influence survival outcomes. Stage at diagnosis and the use of postoperative radiotherapy were factors associated with improved OS.

Outpatient Intensive Nutrition Therapy Improves Survival and Frailty in Males With Alcohol-related ACLF - Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and AimsImprovement in the nutritional status of Acute on Chronic Liver Failure(ACLF) patients may lead to reduction in morbidity and mortality. This study assessed the impact of dietician supported outpatient intensive nutrition therapy(OINT) on survival and frailty in patients with alcohol related ACLF Methods70 patients with alcohol related ACLF(Asia Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, APASL-criteria) and frailty were randomized 1:1 to receive standard medical therapy(SMT) plus OINT(intervention) versus SMT(control) alone. The primary outcome was an improvement in survival at 3 months. Secondary outcome measures included improvement in frailty, prognostic scores and hospitalization. ResultsThere was a significant improvement in overall survival in the OINT group as compared to SMT after 3 months of follow up, 91.4% (Standard error (SE): 4.7%) vs. 57.1% (SE: 8.4%), P<.00). On cox regression model, inclusion in the intervention arm, baseline Skeletal Muscle Index(SMI), and Asia Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver ACLF Research Consortium(AARC score) were independent predictors of survival (P<.05). The Liver frailty index(LFI) score also significantly improved in the OINT as compared to SMT, Δ-0.93 -(0.71-1.13) vs. Δ -0.33 -(0.44-0.72)(P<.00). The disease severity including MELD, MELD-Na, and AARC score showed a significant improvement in the OINT group as compared to the SMT group(P<.05). The patients in OINT group had lesser number of hospitalizations 6(17%) versus 16(45.7%)(P=.01) as compared to SMT group. ConclusionOutpatient intensive nutrition therapy significantly improves survival, frailty and disease severity with a reduction in number of hospitalizations and supports the key role of nutrition in treatment of alcohol related ACLF patients.

Analysis of progression-free and overall survival in ovarian cancer: Bevacizumab treatment outcomes using historical cohort.

Background: The incorporation of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has redefined therapeutic strategies for advanced ovarian cancer. This study evaluates the efficacy of bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy by comparing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes with a historical cohort of patients treated with standard chemotherapy alone. Methods: We conducted an analysis of 71 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated at the University Clinical Center in Niš, Serbia, from April 2017 to March 2023. All patients received standard chemotherapy paired with bevacizumab and were monitored for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age, ECOG performance status, presence of metastases, and pleural effusion. Additionally, a historical cohort of 30 patients treated with standard chemotherapy alone was used for comparison, and Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing treatment outcomes. Results: The study findings indicate significant improvements in median PFS (20 months vs. 15 months) and OS (58 months vs. an undetermined upper limit) compared to the historical cohort. Subgroup analysis of the bevacizumab-treated group revealed that younger patients (<65 years) and those without metastases or pleural effusion exhibited notably better survival outcomes. The hazard ratio for PFS in patients younger than 65 was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45-0.93), suggesting a substantial reduction in disease progression risk compared to older patients. Conclusion: Bevacizumab, when used alongside standard chemotherapy, significantly extends both PFS and OS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. These benefits are particularly pronounced in younger patients. The results underscore the necessity of integrating bevacizumab into the treatment regimen for advanced ovarian cancer, advocating for tailored therapeutic strategies based on individual risk profiles and clinical characteristics. This study reinforces the pivotal role of bevacizumab in enhancing the current ovarian cancer treatment landscape and highlights the potential for further personalizing oncological care.

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Based on a Real-World French Registry.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies that were evaluated in third and later line (3L+) relapsed or refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the ZUMA-1 and JULIET trials, respectively. As of October 2021, the DESCAR-T registry included 729 French patients with 3L+r/r DLBCL who received axi-cel or tisa-cel. Using these data, propensity score matching was used to conduct an adjusted comparison between axi-cel and tisa-cel. Axi-cel was associated with statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and significantly more frequent Grade≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), compared with tisa-cel. There was no significant difference in Grade≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). The current analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of axi-cel versus tisa-cel in the treatment of 3L+r/r DLBCL using propensity score-matched data from the DESCAR-T registry. A partitioned survival model was used to extrapolate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a lifetime. Survival curves for PFS and OS were based on independent mixture cure models fitted to digitized Kaplan-Meier data for the propensity score-matched DESCAR-T populations. Average duration of intensive care unit stays for each of axi-cel and tisa-cel in DESCAR-T were used to inform adverse event costs. Selected parametric survival distributions were based on clinical expert validation. Utility values were derived from ZUMA-1, and costs were obtained from French registries and published sources. List prices were used for both axi-cel and tisa-cel. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 2.5%. Axi-cel is associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €15,520 per QALY compared with tisa-cel. Based on explicit willingness-to-pay thresholds applied in Europe, axi-cel is expected to be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources in real-world clinical settings compared with tisa-cel in 3L+r/r DLBCL.

Impact of First-Line Osimertinib and Other EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on Overall Survival in Untreated Advanced EGFR-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Japan: Updated Data from TREAD Project 01.

Osimertinib shows higher effectiveness than first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the initial treatment of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. However, its superiority in terms of overall survival in the Asian population, especially Japanese patients, remains uncertain. To evaluate the survival benefit ofosimertinib over other EGFR-TKIs in Japanese patients, using real-world data. METHODS: As part of the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project, a retrospective multi-institutional study across 46 hospitals in Japan was conducted to evaluate the overall survival of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer using propensity score matching. The study involved patients receiving osimertinib as the first-line treatment (1L-Osi), those initially treated with other EGFR-TKIs (1L-non-Osi), and those receiving osimertinib after initial EGFR-TKI treatment (2L/later-Osi) between April 2010 and December 2022 and followed up until April 2023. Among 1062 Japanese patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer, 416 (39.2%) received 1L-Osi, while 646 (60.8%) received 1L-non-Osi, including 139 (13.1%) who received 2L/later-Osi. Within these groups, 416 (39.2%), 293 (27.6%), and 75 (7.1%) patients received first-line EGFR-TKI treatment post-osimertinib approval as a later-line treatment in Japan (March 2016). After propensity score matching, the overall survival of the 1L-Osi group was comparable to that of the 1L-non-Osi group in the post-March 2016 subset (n = 283, 42.0 vs 42.4 months). Similar trends were observed in the Del19 and L858R subgroups. The median overall survival of the 2L/later-Osi group was notably long: 60.2 months post-March 2016 (n = 75). A subgroup analysis based on initial EGFR-TKI treatment in the 1L-non-Osi and 2L/later-Osi groups revealed no significant differences among the gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib groups. Based on real-world data, osimertinib did not show a significant improvement in overall survival compared to other EGFR-TKIs as a first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the Japanese (Asian) population. This study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry on 9 March, 2023 (identification UMIN000050552).

Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The landscape of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) is continually evolving. This research aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors compared to placebo as a maintenance therapy for OC patients. We conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the use of PARP inhibitors as maintenance therapy in OC patients, up to 16 June 2024. Data regarding progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), chemotherapy-free interval (CFI), time to first subsequent therapy or death (TFST), time to second subsequent therapy or death (TSST), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were aggregated. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for PFS, OS, CFI, TFST, and TSST. Additionally, the relative risk (RR) and 95% CI for TEAEs were determined. This meta-analysis encompassed 20 RCTs involving 7,832 participants. The overall analysis demonstrated that maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors led to significant improvements in PFS (HR: 0.398, 95% CI = 0.339-0.467, 95% PI = 0.219-0.724), OS (HR: 0.677, 95% CI = 0.582-0.788, 95% PI = 0.546-0.839), CFI (HR: 0.417, 95% CI = 0.368-0.472, 95% PI = 0.265-0.627), TFST (HR: 0.441, 95% CI = 0.391-0.498, 95% PI = 0.308-0.632), and TSST (HR: 0.574, 95% CI = 0.507-0.649, 95% PI = 0.488-0.674) compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses further indicated that PARP inhibitor maintenance treatment significantly improved PFS, regardless of homologous recombination status (all p < 0.05). However, the risks of any grade (RR = 1.046, 95% CI = 1.032-1.059, 95% PI = 1.028-1.055) and grade ≥3 TEAEs (RR = 2.931, 95% CI = 2.641-3.253, 95% PI = 2.128-3.792) were increased by PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy compared to placebo. Our research elucidated the benefits of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors in patients with OC, showing improvements in PFS, OS, CFI, TFST, and TSST. Vigilance regarding TEAEs is paramount for clinicians implementing PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy in clinical practice. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024560286.

Glycemic control in diabetic patients improved overall lung cancer survival across diverse populations.

The consequence of diabetes on lung cancer overall survival (OS) is debated. This retrospective study used 2 large lung cancer databases to assess comprehensively diabetes effects on lung cancer OS in diverse demographic populations, including health disparity. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center database (32 643 lung cancer patients with 11 973 patients with diabetes) was extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) using natural language processing (NLP). Associations were between diabetes and lung cancer prognostic features (age, sex, race, body mass index [BMI], insurance status, smoking, stage, and histopathology). Hemoglobin A1C (HgbA1c) and glucose levels assessed glycemic control. Validation was with a Louisiana cohort (17 768 lung cancer patients with 5402 patients with diabetes) enriched for health disparity cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, and survival tree analyses were employed. Lung cancer patients with diabetes exhibited marginally elevated OS or no statistically significant difference versus nondiabetic patients. When examining OS for 2 glycemic levels (HgbA1c > 7.0 or glucose > 154 mg/dL vs HgbA1c > 9.0 or glucose > 215 mg/dL), a statistically significant improvement in OS occurred in lung cancer patients with controlled versus uncontrolled glycemia (P < .0001). This improvement spanned sex, age, smoking status, insurance status, stage, race, BMI, histopathology, and therapy. Survival tree analysis revealed that obese and morbidly obese patients with controlled glycemia had higher lung cancer OS than comparison groups. These findings indicate a need for optimal glycemic control to improve lung cancer OS in diverse populations with diabetes.

Tislelizumab synergizes with surgery to augment the survival benefit in stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer

ObjectivesThis retrospective study evaluated the individual benefits of tislelizumab and surgery, as well as their synergistic effect on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.MethodsFrom September 2019 to June 2022, all participants with potentially resectable NSCLC who received chemotherapy (C) or tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (T) were included in the study. Participants were categorized into four groups based on surgery or not (S or NS) and the utilization of tislelizumab (T or C). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, as well as Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsCompared to C, T was associated with significantly higher objective response rate (64.54% vs. 34.78%, p = 0.003), higher pathological complete response rate (40.00% vs. 14.06%, p = 0.007), and higher major pathological response rate (60.00% vs. 20.31%, p < 0.001). The T + S group exhibited a proportionately higher reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared to the sum of the T + NS group and C + S group. Regardless of C or T, surgery was associated with improved OS (p < 0.01). Without surgery, T did not show significant improvement in PFS or OS. However, with surgery, T significantly improved both PFS and OS (ps < 0.01).ConclusionTislelizumab with subsequent surgery synergistically improves the survival benefits in patients with NSCLC.