Significant Difference In Injury Severity Score Research Articles

Falls From Heights: A Retrospective Review of Roof Fall-Related Trauma.

Background Falls from roofs (FFRs), while constituting just a segment of all falls, pose a significant public health issue. They not only impact individuals in their daily lives but also pose an increased risk in the construction field. The consequences of these falls range broadly, from minor bruises to serious harm, potentially leading to chronic disability or fatality. For the general populace, such falls might happen during simple activities like maintenance, with outcomes varying from fractures to critical head or spinal injuries. In construction, where elevated work is the norm, the likelihood and potential severity of falls are significantly greater. Construction workers face the threat of falls regularly, with these mishaps often resulting in enduring disabilities that affect both life quality and work capability. Methodology This study presents data from a trauma registry system, covering trauma admissions from March 31, 2016, to December 27, 2021, at a level 1 trauma center (Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, CA). During this five-year and eight-month period, a total of 3,148 patients presented to the emergency department after a fall. This study focuses on patients admitted after an FFR. A retrospective analysis of this data showed that out of these 3,148 patients, 75 presented after an FFR. Results In this retrospective analysis of 75 patients presenting to the emergency department after an FFR, the patient profile was predominantly male (70, 93%), with an average age of 51 years. Hospitalization was required for the majority of thepatients (70, 93%), with a third necessitating intensive care unit (ICU) care. The necessity for surgical procedures was high at 57 (76%). Upon discharge, 8 (11%) patients were moved to acute rehabilitation. Injuries to the extremities were most common, accounting for 21% (36) of cases, in contrast to facial injuries at 8% (15). Upper extremity fractures were the most prevalent presenting injury at 31% (50), while lower extremity fractures were the least at 6% (9). The overall Injury Severity Score (ISS) averaged 12, with patients having hospital length of stays (LOSs) over 10 days presenting higher ISS scores (18) compared to those with shorter stays (ISS of 11). There was no significant difference in ISS between patients aged 60 and above compared to younger patients. Conclusions FFRs represent a substantial cause of injury in both the construction industry and residential settings. This study aims to provide an overview and summary of the existing literature on FFRs, present effective fall prevention methods, and underscore the considerable consequences of such injuries on both construction workers and homeowners. Additionally, it includes an analysis of a dataset detailing injuries resulting from roof-related falls, offering a comparison to existing research.

Injury Patterns in Vehicle Crashes: The Significance of Occupant Seating Position.

Investigating patterns among the outcomes of patients involved in motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) can provide information necessary to guide targeted interventions to improve road traffic safety. Our purpose is to identify any differences between passenger and driver injury severity and overall clinical course after MVAs. We performed a retrospective review and analysis of 3,693 patients involved in MVAs from 2016 to 2021. We divided the data into two groups, drivers and passengers, and compared the Injury Severity Score (ISS),Revised Trauma Score (RTS) on admission, days in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), length of hospital stay (LOS), post Emergency Department (ED) disposition, discharge (DC) disposition, and signs of life on arrival (SOLA) to the ED. We compared mean ISS, New Injury Severity Score (NISS), RTS, length in ICU and LOS using a student's T-test and SOLA, post-ED and DC disposition using Chi-squareanalysis. We did not find any statistically significant difference in ISS, RTS, days in ICU, LOS, or SOLA between the drivers and passengers. However, we did find a statistically significant difference in the post-ED (X2= 113.743, p=<0.0001) and DC disposition (X2=41.172, p=<0.0001) of drivers and passengers.After the ED and DC, morepassengers were transferred to a higher level of care than expected, while the inverse was true for drivers. The number of drivers discharged to Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) was also higher than expected, further contributingto the observed difference in DC disposition. Conclusion:Our study found no statistically significant difference between driver and passenger injury severity, length of hospital stay, days in ICU, and SOLA after an MVA. The clinical courses of the two groups were found to be significantly different based on post-ED and DC disposition data. We identified limitations, such as a relatively small sample size and insufficient data on specific car seat locations for passengers, underscoring the need for a more nuanced exploration. Future research must broaden its scope to encompass diverse crash scenarios, vehicle design and safety technologies, seat belt dynamics, and age- and gender-specific vulnerabilities.

Validation of the Hierarchical Nature of the AO Spine Sacral Classification and the Development of the Sacral AO Spine Injury Score.

Global cross-sectional survey. The objective of this study was to validate the hierarchical nature of the AO Spine Sacral Classification System and develop an injury scoring system. Although substantial interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the AO Spine Sacral Classification System has been established, the hierarchical nature of the classification has yet to be validated. Respondents numerically graded each variable within the classification system for severity. Based on the results, a Sacral AO Spine Injury Score (AOSIS) was developed. A total of 142 responses were received. The classification exhibited a hierarchical Injury Severity Score (ISS) progression (A1: 8 to C3: 95) with few exceptions. Subtypes B1 and B2 fractures showed no significant difference in ISS (B1 43.9 vs. B2 43.4, P =0.362). In addition, the transitions A3→B1 and B3→C0 represent significant decreases in ISS (A3 66.3 vs. B1 43.9, P <0.001; B3 64.2 vs. C0 46.4, P <0.001). Accordingly, A1 injury was assigned a score of 0. A2 and A3 received scores of 1 and 3 points, respectively. Posterior pelvic injuries B1 and B2 both received a score of 2. B3 received a score of 3 points. C0, C1, C2, and C3 received scores of 2, 3, 5, and 6 points, respectively. The scores assigned to neurological modifiers N0, N1, N2, N3, and NX were 0, 1, 2, 4, and 3, respectively. Case-specific modifiers M1, M2, M3, and M4 received scores of 0, 0, 1, and 2 points, respectively. The results of this study validate the hierarchical nature of the AO Spine Sacral Classification System. The Sacral AOSIS sets the foundation for further studies to develop a universally accepted treatment algorithm for the treatment of complex sacral injuries. Level IV-Diagnostic.

Pediatric firearm-associated fractures: Analysis of management and outcomes.

BACKGROUNDFirearm-associated injuries (FAIs) are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in children living in the United States. Most victims of such injuries survive, but may experience compromised function related to musculoskeletal injuries. Although complex firearm-associated fractures (FAFs) often require specialized orthopaedic, vascular, and plastic surgical intervention, there is minimal research describing their management and outcomes. The purpose of this study is to describe the epidemiology and presentation of pediatric FAFs, as well as evaluate the management and outcomes of these injuries.AIMTo describe the epidemiology and presentation of pediatric FAFs, as well as evaluate the management and outcomes of these injuries.METHODSA retrospective chart review was performed at a major, pediatric level 1 trauma center. The study included patients aged 18 or younger who presented with FAIs between 2008-2018. Additional data was collected on patients with FAFs including demographic and clinical data such as age, sex, race, payor type, fracture location, injury severity score (ISS), and radiographic and clinical outcomes. The management of FAFs was analyzed as well as need for readmission and reoperation. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results and univariate analyses were performed to assess differences between groups.RESULTSBetween 2008 and 2018, there were a total of 61 patients who presented with FAIs. In this cohort, 21 patients (34%) sustained FAFs (25 fractures) with a mean age of 11 (Range: 10 mo to 18 years old) at the time of presentation. Approximately 52% (n = 11) of patients with FAFs were male, 76% (n = 8 and n = 8, respectively) identified as black or other, and 71% (n = 15) had government insurance. FAFs were most commonly noted in the upper extremity (n = 7) and lower extremity (n = 6). In patients with FAFs, the mean ISS at presentation was 11.38 (Range: 2-38), and 24% of patients (n = 5) were classified as having a major trauma. There were no significant differences in age, sex, race, and payor type in FAF patients that presented with and without major trauma (P > 0.05). When comparing FAF and non-FAF patients, there was a statistically significant difference in ISS (11.38 vs 14.45, P = 0.02). In total, 33% (n = 7) of patients with FAFs required orthopaedic surgical management, which was most commonly comprised of debridement (n = 6/7, 86%), and 14% (n = 1/7) of these patients required coordinated care with plastic and/or vascular surgery. There were no significant differences in age and payor type in patients with FAFs treated with and without orthopaedic surgery. Of the patients with FAFs, 52% (n = 11) had a minimum 90-d follow-up, and 48% (n = 10) had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two patients were readmitted within 90-d, while one patient required a reoperation within 2-years. CONCLUSIONOver 25% of FAIs in pediatric patients result in FAFs. FAFs often present to pediatric trauma centers and the majority of these injuries occur in non-Caucasian males with government insurance. Most FAFs do not need orthopaedic surgical management; 14% of these injuries require subspecialty care by orthopaedic surgery, vascular surgery, or plastic surgery. Patients with FAFs also have lower ISS compared to patients who sustained FAIs without fracture. Thus, these patients should be treated at pediatric trauma centers with specialty care and additional research is needed to focus prevention efforts, understand reasons for poor follow-up, and evaluate outcomes after injury.

Prediction of mortality in critically-ill elderly trauma patients: a single centre retrospective observational study and comparison of the performance of trauma scores

BackgroundTrauma in the elderly (≥ 65 years) population is increasing. This study compares the performance of trauma scoring systems in predicting 30-day mortality among the traumatised elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit in a major trauma centre.MethodsWe collected retrospective data for all elderly trauma patients admitted to our intensive care units between January 2012 and December 2017. We assessed Injury Severity Score (ISS), Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) and the Trauma Audit and Research Network’s (TARN) Probability of Survival (Ps17) between survivors and non-survivors. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the performance of these scoring systems.ResultsThere were 255 elderly trauma patients with overall 30-day survival of 76%. There was a statistically significant difference in ISS, GTOS and Ps17 scores between survivors and non-survivors (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was statistically significant for all 3, with AUROC of 0.66 (95% CI 0.59–0.74) for the ISS, 0.68 (95% CI 0.61–0.76) for the GTOS and 0.79 (95% CI 0.72–0.85) for the Ps17. The optimal cut-off points were ≥ 28, ≥ 142, ≤ 76.73 for ISS, GTOS and Ps17, respectively.ConclusionBoth ISS and GTOS scoring systems preformed equally in predicting 30-day mortality in traumatised elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit, however neither were robust enough to utilise in clinical practise. The Ps17 performed more robustly, although was not developed for prognosticating on individual patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these scoring systems in critically-ill elderly traumatised patients, which may help to facilitate early prognostication.

Rectal trauma injuries: outcomes from the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank.

There is a lack of general consensus and a littlepublished data regarding the management of trauma-related rectal injuries and outcomes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the surgical management and corresponding outcomes for this patient cohort, using a nationwide trauma database. Rectal injuries and procedures performed over a 2-year period (2013 and 2014) were identified through ICD-9 clinical modification codes, from the United States National Trauma Data Bank. Patient factors, management variables, and outcomes were evaluated. Of 1.7million patients, 1472 (0.1%) sustained a rectal injury; 81% male, median age 30years (range 16-89years) and 60% due to penetrating trauma. Seven hundred and seventy-eight (52.8%) had an isolated extraperitoneal injury and 694 (47.2%) had isolated Intraperitoneal or combined intra- and extraperitoneal injuries. Overall, 726 patients (49.3%) underwent fecal diversion. Injuries following blunt trauma were associated with higher injury severity scores (ISS), lower stoma rates, longer hospital and intensive-care unit (ICU) stay, and higher mortality rates than penetrating trauma (all p ≤ 0.001). Patients with stoma formation had lower mortality than undiverted patients (8.6 vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001) despite a higher ISS and more intraperitoneal injuries, but longer hospital and ICU stay (all p ≤ 0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, older age, higher ISS, intraperitoneal injury, and return to the ICU were independently associated with higher rates of mortality, while stoma formation was associated with a lower mortality rate. For isolated extraperitoneal rectal injuries, 494 patients (63.5%) were managed by resection/repair without stoma and had significantly lower overall postoperative morbidity rates (12.7 vs. 30.2%, p = 0.009) and shorter hospital stay (14 vs. 23 days, p < 0.001), than those who underwent resection/repair + stoma (n = 284; 36.5%), despite no significant difference in ISS (29 vs. 27, p = 0.780). There was no significant difference in mortality. Our results showed that trauma-related rectal injuries are rare and there iswide variation in their management. These data support a low threshold for stoma formation in patients with intraperitoneal or combined injuries, while suggesting that isolated extraperitoneal defects may be safely managed without fecal diversion.

Outcomes After Open Reduction With Internal Fixation of Mandible Fractures.

Mandible fractures contribute substantially to morbidity after blunt trauma. Controversy exists surrounding the appropriate timing of surgical intervention and benefit from routine postreduction imaging. The authors retrospectively reviewed 146 patients who sustained traumatic mandible fractures at a level 2 trauma center over a 5-year period, between January 2012 and December 2016. The authors excluded all patients who did not undergo surgery, underwent operative closed reduction only, sustained other significant maxillofacial injuries, penetrating mechanisms, and other major injuries based on injury severity scores (ISS) over 15. There were 51 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The authors reviewed admission face computed tomography (CT) scans and Panorex x-rays. Patients were divided into early (<72 hours) and late (>72 hours) open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) groups. The authors reviewed demographics, mechanism of injury, postreduction imaging, and ISS. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 15. There were 39 males (76%) and 12 females (24%) in the authors' study, with a mean age of 32 years. Twenty-eight patients (55%) underwent early ORIF and 23 patients (45%) underwent late ORIF, with no mortalities. There was no statistically significant difference in ISS between the 2 groups (P = 0.081). Preoperative face CT scans were performed in 49 patients (96%) and Panorex in 2 patients (4%). Eight patients (16%) had both modalities, with CT face identifying fractures in 5 patients not seen on Panorex, resulting in a change in operative approach. Postreduction imaging was obtained in 33 patients (65%), of whom 26 were Panorex X-rays. These demonstrated adequate reduction in 31 patients (94%) and did not change management in any instance. Complications occurred in 19 patients (37%), of whom there were 11 with uncontrolled pain after 1 week, 6 abscesses, 5 nonunions/malunions, 2 hardware extrusions, and 1 incisional dehiscence. A positive urine drug screen predicted uncontrolled pain (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in complications between the 2 groups. The authors' data suggest that CT scans of the face are superior to panoramic radiographs in traumatic mandible fracture evaluation, with no apparent benefit from routine postreduction imaging in detecting complications. Open reduction with internal fixation remains an effective treatment with favorable outcomes, and operative delays > 72 hours do not appear to increase complication rates.

Endotheliopathy of Trauma is an on-Scene Phenomenon, and is Associated with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study.

Trauma patients are vulnerable to coagulopathy and inflammatory dysfunction associated with endotheliopathy of trauma (EoT). In vitro evidence has suggested that tranexamic acid (TXA) may ameliorate endotheliopathy. We aimed to investigate how soon after injury EoT occurs, its association with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and whether TXA ameliorates it. A prospective observational study included 91 trauma patients enrolled within 60 min of injury and 19 healthy controls. Blood was sampled on enrolment and again 4 to 12 h later. ELISAs measured serum concentrations of syndecan-1 and thrombomodulin as biomarkers of EoT. MODS was compared between groups according to biomarker dynamics: persistently abnormal; abnormal to normal; and persistently normal. Timing of EoT was estimated by plotting biomarker data against time, and then fitting generalized additive models. Biomarker dynamics were compared between those who did or did not receive prehospital TXA. Median age was 38 (interquartile range [IQR] 24-55) years; 78 of 91 were male. Median injury severity score (ISS) was 22 (IQR 12-36). EoT was estimated to occur at 5 to 8 min after injury. There were no significant differences in ISS between those with or without prehospital EoT. Forty-two patients developed MODS; 31 of 42 with persistently abnormal; 8 of 42 with abnormal to normal; and 3 of 42 with persistently normal biomarkers; P < 0.05. There were no significant differences between TXA and non-TXA groups. EoT was present at the scene of injury. MODS was more likely when biomarkers of EoT were persistently raised. There were no significant differences between TXA and non-TXA groups. Prehospital interventions aimed at endothelial restoration may represent a clinically meaningful target for prehospital resuscitation.

Polytrauma Patients With Associated Spine Fractures: An Assessment of Surgical Intervention on Patient Outcome.

Retrospective comparative study. To examine perioperative characteristics among polytraumatized patients with operative, unstable spine fractures with and without concomitant operative long bone injuries. Treatment of polytrauma patients has delicate and time-sensitive protocols to ensure successful recovery. The literature defines standards for vertebral injury and surgical intervention. Severely polytraumatized patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS)≥15 were divided according to those with operative spine fractures with operative long bone fractures (OSFLBF) and those with operative spine fractures alone (OSFA). Patients were compared by sex, age, mechanism of injury (MOI), ISS, location of injuries, time spent inpatient before procedure(s), total time in the operating room, type of procedure(s) performed, estimated operative blood loss, complications, length of stay (LOS), and time to discharge. In a 12-year period, >600 patients were admitted to our level I trauma center with polytrauma and unstable spine fracture. Twelve had sustained operative unstable spine injuries and 21 had unstable spine injuries with a long bone injury requiring operative stabilization. Significant differences in ISS, LOS, MOI, region of vertebral injury, or total operating room time between the 2 groups were not observed. Differences were seen concerning average blood loss during surgery and time spent inpatient before entering the operating room. OSFLBF patients were discharged at a faster rate after 20 days compared with OSFSA patients. No differences in ISS, LOS, MOI, region of vertebral injury or vertebral procedure, or total operating room time were observed. Blood loss was more substantial in the OSFLBF group, but it spent fewer days in the hospital preoperatively. Despite a nonstatistical difference in LOS, a larger proportion of OSFA patients remained in the hospital after being inpatient for >20 days, reducing the risk for iatrogenic complication in that group compared with OSFA. III, retrospective comparative.

Evaluation of a revised in-hospital trauma activation protocol according to clinical outcome for patients with major trauma

Summary Purpose Timely trauma care is crucial, especially for severely injured patients. We developed a set of criteria based on physiological changes, anatomic regions injured, and trauma mechanisms in our hospital to identify these patients. This study was performed to examine whether or not our revised activation protocol was strictly followed, and to identify areas of deficiency for ongoing quality improvement. The impact of the activation protocol on clinical outcome was also examined. Methods We reviewed demographic data, mechanisms of injury, trauma scores, and outcome for all trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center in southern Taiwan between October 2010 and October 2011. All trauma protocol activation (TPA) decisions were subjected to careful scrutiny. Clinical outcomes for TPA patients and for non-TPA patients who fulfilled the activation criteria were compared. We also analyzed data for patients who did not meet our activation criteria but were found on subsequent work-up to have an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16. Results During Phase I of the study there were 2988 trauma admissions. The overall accuracy for TPA was 95.9%. Among 281 TPA patients, only 181 (64.4%) fulfilled the activation criteria. Among 204 patients who met the activation criteria, the protocol was not activated for 23 (11.3%). After we redesigned the computer program to prompt triage nurses and re-educated healthcare personnel, the false TPA and non-TPA rates improved to 14.6% and 2.8%, respectively, during Phase II of the study. There were 187 patients who did not meet our activation criteria and had ISS ≥ 16. TPA patients had a significantly lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit than non-TPA patients. However, there were no significant differences in ISS, mortality, or admission days. Some 120 patients had a significant brain injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale–Head ≥2) and only 76% of them presented with signs or symptoms suggesting head trauma. These patients were older and had a lower ISS compared to brain-injured TPA patients. Conclusion The study shows that our TPA criteria are easy to follow and have a high accuracy rate. For patients with ISS ≥16 who did not meet our TPA criteria, escape was mainly due to head trauma. Additional factors besides GCS scores should be incorporated in the protocol to identify patients with significant head trauma.

TEG-guided resuscitation is superior to standardized MTP resuscitation in massively transfused penetrating trauma patients

For nearly a decade, our center performed thromboelastograms (TEGs) to analyze coagulation profiles, allowing rapid data-driven blood component therapy. After consensus recommendations for massive transfusion protocols (MTPs), we implemented an MTP in October 2009 with 1:1:1 ratio of blood (red blood cells [RBC]), plasma (fresh-frozen plasma [FFP]), and platelets. We hypothesized that TEG-directed resuscitation is equivalent to MTP resuscitation. All patients receiving 6 units (U) or more of RBC in the first 24 hours for 21 months before and after MTP initiation in an urban Level I trauma center were examined. Demographics, mechanism of injury (MOI), Injury Severity Score (ISS), 24-hour volume of RBC, FFP, platelets, crystalloid, and 30-day mortality were compared, excluding patients with traumatic brain injuries. Variables were analyzed using Student's t-test and χ2 or Fisher's exact test. For the preMTP group, there were 165 patients. In the MTP group, there were 124 patients. There were no significant differences in ISS, age, or sex. PreMTP patients with 6U or more RBC had significantly more penetrating MOI (p = 0.017), whereas preMTP patients with 10U or more RBC had similar MOIs. All patients received less crystalloid after MTP adoption (p < 0.001). There was no difference in volume of blood products or mortality in patients receiving 6U or more RBC. Blunt trauma MTP patients who received 10U or more RBC received more FFP (p = 0.02), with no change in mortality. Penetrating trauma patients who received 10U or more RBC received a similar volume of FFP; however, mortality increased from 54.1% for MTP versus 33.3% preMTP (p = 0.04). TEG-directed resuscitation is equivalent to standardized MTP for patients receiving 6U or more RBC and for blunt MOI patients receiving 10U or more RBC. MTP therapy worsened mortality in penetrating MOI patients receiving 10U or more RBC, indicating a continued need for TEG-directed therapy. A 1:1:1 strategy may not be adequate in all patients. Therapeutic study, level IV.

Pre-hospital trauma care: A comparison of two healthcare systems

Introduction:The management of trauma patients differs depending upon the healthcare system available.Aim:To compare the pre-hospital management and outcome of polytrauma patients between two countries with differing approaches to pre-hospital management.Materials and Methods:The Scottish trauma and audit group (STAG) and the German trauma registry (GTR) databases were used to compare the management and outcome of trauma patients in Scotland and Germany. Severely injured patients (injury severity score (ISS) > 16) were analyzed for a 3 year period (2000 to 2002). Patient demographics, pre-hospital interventions, ISS, revised trauma score (RTS), time from scene of injury to arrival to the emergency department (ED), 120 day mortality and standardized mortality ratios using TRISS methodology were compared.Results:There were 227 patients identified from the STAG registry and 6878 patients from the GTR registry. There was a significant difference in ISS (24.9 vs. 29.8, P = 0.001, respectively). No significant difference was observed for the RTS (P = 0.2). There was a significantly higher rate of pre-hospital interventions in the German group (P < 0.001). The mean time from an injury to arrival to the ED (73 vs. 247 minutes, P = 0.001) was longer for the Scottish patients. There was no difference for an unadjusted mortality rate between the groups, but the standardized mortality ratio was significantly greater for the Scottish population (3.8 vs. 2.2, P = 0.036).Conclusion:Despite variation in pre-hospital transfer times and interventions, no significant difference was demonstrated in RTS upon arrival, or for the unadjusted mortality rates.

Acute Ethanol Intoxication and the Trauma Patient: Hemodynamic Pitfalls

Many trauma patients are acutely intoxicated with alcohol. Animal studies have demonstrated that acute alcohol intoxication inhibits the normal release of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and vasopressin in response to acute hemorrhage. Ethanol also increases nitric oxide release and inhibits antidiuretic hormone secretion. This article studies the effects of alcohol intoxication (measured by blood alcohol level, BAL) on the presentation and resuscitation of trauma patients with blunt hepatic injuries. A retrospective registry and chart review was conducted of all patients who presented with blunt liver injuries at an ACS-verified, level I trauma center. Data collected included admission BAL, systolic blood pressure, hematocrit, International Normalized Ratio (INR), liver injury grade, Injury Severity Score (ISS), intravenous fluid and blood product requirements, base deficit, and mortality. From September 2002 to May 2008, 723 patients were admitted with blunt hepatic injuries. Admission BAL was obtained in 569 patients, with 149 having levels >0.08%. Intoxicated patients were more likely to be hypotensive on admission (p = 0.01) despite a lower liver injury grade and no significant difference in ISS. There was no significant difference in the percent of intoxicated patients requiring blood transfusion. However, when blood was given, intoxicated patients required significantly more units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) than their nonintoxicated counterparts (p = 0.01). Intoxicated patients also required more intravenous fluid during their resuscitation (p = 0.002). Alcohol intoxication may impair the ability of blunt trauma patients to compensate for acute blood loss, making them more likely to be hypotensive on admission and increasing their PRBC and intravenous fluid requirements. All trauma patients should have BAL drawn upon admission and their resuscitation should be performed with an understanding of the physiologic alterations associated with acute alcohol intoxication.

Clinical results of surgical management in type ii odontoid fracture: a preliminary report

This study was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of surgical approaches in type II odontoid fracture. In a retrospective study in Mashhad university, 15 patients with anterior screw fixation technique (ASF) and 31 patients with posterior approaches (PA) were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, length of hospital stay, operation time, injury severity score (ISS), Preinjury Charlson comorbidity index, fusion rate and surgical complications were analyzed in these two groups. Neck pain was the most common clinical presentation in these two groups (89.7%). There were no significant differences in ISS and mean length of hospital stay and Comorbidity index between the two groups. The operation time was different between these two groups (65 minutes in ASF versus118 minutes in PA, P < 0.05). Bone union was documented in 13 patients (87%) with ASF and 28 patients (90%) with PA. The outcome of surgery with anterior or posterior approach in the patients are potential candidates for surgery is good. In our patients, the operation time is different in the two groups but differences in fusion rate, length of hospital stay, comorbidity index and postsurgical complications are not considerable.

Investigating moderate to severe paediatric trauma in the Auckland region

To investigate differences between paediatric patients with moderate to severe trauma admitted from two paediatric ED, with respect to: demographics, patterns of presentation, mechanism of injury, injury severity scores (ISS), interventions and outcome. Retrospective cohort study. Moderate to severe trauma was defined as ISS>9. Paediatric patients admitted to hospital via Starship Children's Emergency or KidzFirst ED, with trauma from 1 May 2003 to 30 April 2004, with ISS>9 were identified using multiple databases. The charts were reviewed and data collected included: demographics, hospital of first presentation, diagnoses, ISS, Paediatric trauma score (PTS), Glasgow coma score (GCS), ventilator hours, length of admission, survival and discharge destination. Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals, Mann-Whitney U-test, chi2-test and Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate. A total of 393 children with moderate to severe trauma were identified using initial search strategies. Of these, 82 children met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study; 42 children were admitted via KidzFirst ED and 40 via Starship Children's ED. There was no statistically significant difference in ISS (P=0.86), PTS (P=0.11), GCS (P=0.62), hours on a ventilator (P=0.28) and length of stay (P=0.87) between children admitted from Starship or KidzFirst ED. This study suggests that there are no differences in the numbers or severity of paediatric trauma patients admitted from the Starship and KidzFirst ED. This indicates triage is to the closest ED despite having a tertiary referral centre for paediatric trauma available in Auckland City.

Helicopter use in rural trauma

To profile a helicopter emergency medical service in rural Australia. To assess patient injury severities and outcomes. To compare missions involving ambulance officers with physicians. To determine any time advantage of the aircraft over ground transfer. Intention-to-treat analysis using retrospective case note review of all helicopter emergency medical service trauma patients from January 2004 to November 2006. Global positioning system mapping technology was used to compare one-way road transfer times with two-way helicopter retrieval. Two hundred and twenty-two missions were identified from the helicopter log. Forty missions were aborted in flight. Of 182 patients transported, 11 records were incomplete, leaving 171 for analysis. Fifty (29%) patients transported had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15; the average ISS was 12.30 (standard error of the mean 0.82). The average calculated distance flown was 160.4 nautical miles (standard error of the mean 5.29; range 28-360 nautical miles). There was no significant difference in ISS between ambulance officers and physician groups (t = -1.17, P = 0.25, 95% CI -7.37-1.91). There was no difference in the incidence of severe injury (ISS > 15, P = 0.39) or mortality (P = 0.33) when the groups were compared. Air transport was significantly faster beyond 100 km, with a mean difference of 48 min (P = 0.00). We could not identify a significant survival benefit attributable to the addition of a doctor, although numbers for this comparison were small. Predicting missions where flight physicians might provide benefit remain imprecise and should be a priority area for prospective evaluation. We have demonstrated that in the absence of special circumstances, a helicopter response within 100 km from base does not improve time to definitive care.

Associated Injuries and Not Fracture Instability Predict Mortality in Pelvic Fractures: A Prospective Study of 100 Patients

Whether pelvic fracture instability is correlated to mortality in blunt multiply-injured trauma patients is debatable. This is the first prospective study on patients with pelvic fractures aiming at finding whether pelvic fracture type affects mortality. There were 100 consecutive patients (77 males, mean age of 31 [3-73] years) studied between September 2003 and October 2004. Data were collected regarding mechanism of injury, associated injuries, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score, blood transfusions, and mortality. The fractures were classified according to instability, where type O is stable, type R is rotationally unstable, and type RV is both rotationally and vertically unstable. Because a pure acetabular fracture is a single break in the pelvic ring, we classified it as type O. Computer tomography was used for fracture classification in 73 patients and plain X-rays in 27 patients. There were 77 fractures caused by road traffic collisions. Type O fractures (n = 63) had lower median ISS (13 [4-48]) than type R (n = 19) (18 [9-75]) and type RV (n = 18) (18 [6-66]) (p = 0.019, Kruskall Wallis). There was no significant difference in ISS between type R and RV fractures. A logistic regression model has shown that ISS was the only significant factor that predicts mortality. ISS is the most important predictor in defining mortality in patients with pelvic fracture and not the type of pelvic instability.