Significant Differences In HbA1c Research Articles

Geographic information system mapping and predictors of glycemic control in children and youth with type 1 diabetes: a study from Western India.

Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping, is a novel way to provide insights into spatial distribution of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and associations between T1D outcomes and potential predictors. We aimed to explore GIS in children with T1D, and identify predictors of poor glycemic control. Design: Cross-sectional; Participants: 402 children and youth (187 boys) with T1D. Place of residence (coordinates) of participants were geocoded in GIS. They were divided into two groups living in urban or peri-urban areas using ArcGIS Pro. The characteristics of urban/peri-urban living were linked to sociodemographic and biochemical data and spatial autocorrelation analysis was performed. Association between glycemic control and distance to our unit was studied. Mean age was 13.2±4.7 years; 196 children were living in urban areas, 206 in peri-urban areas. There was significant difference in HbA1c between groups (Urban 9.9 (9.7, 10.2) %, Peri-urban 10.5 (10.1, 10.8) %) (p=0.004); mean difference 0.5 (0.1, 1.0) with poorer glycemic control and higher prevalence of vitamin D sufficiency in peri-urban and higher prevalence of hypothyroidism in urban areas. There was significant correlation between glycemic control (HbA1c) and distance to our unit r=0.108 (0.023, 0.218) (p=0.031). Individuals with an HbA1c≥9.5 were residing farther away (58.9 (49.4, 68.5) km) as compared to those with HbA1c <9.5 (44.5 (35.1, 53.9) km) (p<0.05). Children with T1D when grouped using GIS had differences in glycemic control and comorbidities; peri-urban participants and those residing further away from our unit had poorer glycemic control. Future efforts may be aimed at identifying centers and channelizing resources towards children showing poor glycemic control, thus optimizing disease management.

Impact of an SMS intervention to support type 2 diabetes self-management: DiabeText clinical trial.

Complications arising from uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) pose a significant burden on individuals' well-being and healthcare resources. Digital interventions may play a key role in mitigating such complications by supporting patients to adequately self-manage their condition. To assess the impact of DiabeText, a new theory-based, patient-centered, mobile health intervention integrated with electronic health records to send tailored short text messages to support T2DM self-management. Pragmatic, Phase III, 12-month, two-arm randomized clinical trial with T2DM primary care patients in Spain. 742 participants with suboptimal glycemic control (HbA1c>7.5) were randomly allocated to a control (usual care) or intervention (DiabeText) group. The DiabeText group received, in addition to usual care, 165 messages focused on healthy lifestyle and medication adherence. glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). medication possession ratio, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), diabetes self-efficacy (DSES); and self-reported adherence to medication, Mediterranean diet (MEDAS-14), and physical activity (IPAQ). Over the 12-month period, we observed no significant differences in HbA1c between the intervention and the control groups (Beta=-0.025 (-0.198 to 0.147; p=0.772)). In comparison with the control group, the DiabeText group showed significant (p<0.05) improvements in self-reported medication adherence (OR=1.4; 95%CI: 1.0 to 1.9), DSES (Cohen's d=0.35), and EQ5D-5L (Cohen's d=0.18) scores; but not in the rest of secondary outcomes. DiabeText successfully improved quality of life, diabetes self-management, and self-reported medication adherence in primary care patients with T2DM. Further research is needed to enhance its effects on physiological outcomes.

Effect of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Flash Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effect of the real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods: A systematic literature search of all relevant studies comparing the clinical effectiveness of rt-CGM and FGM in adults with T1DM on Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 2015 to June 2023 was performed. The primary endpoints were glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and TIR (time in range). Secondary endpoints included time below range [TBR (<3.9 mmol/L) and (<3.0 mmol/L)], time above range [TAR (>10.0 mmol/L) and (>13.9 mmol/L)], mean glucose, and glycemic variability (GV) [standard deviations (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV)]. Results: Six studies with 1516 TIDM patients, including three randomized controlled trials and three observational studies, were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Compared to FGM, rt-CGM led to greater glycemic control, represented by higher TIR (%, 3.9 ∼ 10 mmol/L) (SMD = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.37 ∼ 0.81, p < 0.001), decreased TBR (%, <3.9 mmol/L) (SMD = -1.45, 95%CI: -2.33 ∼ -0.57, p = 0.001), decreased TAR [(%, >10.0 mmol/L) (SMD = -0.38, 95%CI: -0.71 ∼ -0.04, p = 0.03) and (%, >13.9 mmol/L) (SMD = -0.42, 95%CI: -0.79 ∼ -0.04, p = 0.03), respectively], lower mean glucose (SMD = -0.18, 95%CI: -0.31 ∼ -0.06, p = 0.003), decreased SD (SMD = -0.70, 95%CI: -1.09 ∼ -0.31, p < 0.001), and decreased CV (SMD = -0.76, 95%CI: -1.05 ∼ -0.47, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in lowering HbA1c and TBR (%, <3.0 mmol/L) between groups. Conclusion: The rt-CGM outperformed FGM in improving several key CGM metrics among adults with T1DM, but there is no significant difference in HbA1c and TBR (<3.0 mmol/L).

The effectiveness of 0.5 mg and 1mg of semaglutide in patients with type two diabetes and predictors of response: a retrospective cohort study.

Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs) approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at doses up to 1 mg. The results from randomized control trials and real-world studies revealed that weekly semaglutide was associated with significant improvements in HbA1c and body weight. To our knowledge, no study assessed the effectiveness of using semaglutide for patients with T2DM in the Saudi population. We aim to assess the effectiveness of once weekly SC 0.5 and 1 mg of semaglutide on HbA1c and weight reduction in patients with T2DM in the Saudi population within 12 months of use, evaluate the predictors of response, and compare the effect of the two doses. This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at Security Force Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Using electronic medical records of patients with type two diabetes who received semaglutide 0.5 or 1 mg for a total duration of at least 12 months of use. Within the study period of semaglutide use, HbA1c significantly decreased from baseline by -2.1% (-2.3 to -1.91, 95% CI) (P <0.001). While the mean change in weight was -6.19kg (-6.66 to -5.72, 95% CI) (P<0.001). Moreover, BMI, FBG, total cholesterol, LDL, and TG all decreased significantly from baseline (p<0.001). When comparing the sub-groups of 0.5 and 1 mg doses, although results were numerically favorable of 1 mg, there were no statistically significant differences in HbA1c % (-2.1 ± 1.8 vs. -2.1 ± 1.9, p-value= 0.934, respectively), and weight (-6.1 ± 5 vs. -6.2 ± 4.4kg, p-value=0.837, respectively). Significant predictors of HbA1c reduction were the duration of DM, baseline HbA1c, and insulin therapy. While the significant predictor for weight reduction was insulin therapy. This study is document the effectiveness of once-weekly SC semaglutide on glycemic control and weight loss in real-world practice. We recommend a starting goal dose of 0.5 mg and gradual increase of dose based individual patient response. further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of various semagltude doses.

Comparing long-term outcomes of children treated with new-onset type 2 diabetes in an outpatient versus inpatient setting: A retrospective chart review.

Early identification and management of pediatric type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is crucial for improving long-term outcomes. This study aimed to assess if the severity of T2DM at presentation, inferred by the location of treatment initiation (inpatient or outpatient), influences long-term clinical outcomes. A retrospective chart review was conducted on 116 pediatric T2DM patients. Data on treatment initiation location, initial and subsequent glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, prescribed insulin, and body mass index were collected from electronic medical records. Of the 116 patients, 69 were initially treated in an inpatient setting, and 47 received outpatient treatment. At treatment initiation, the inpatient group had significantly higher HbA1c levels compared to the outpatient group (p < .001), but 3 years after treatment initiation, no significant difference in HbA1c was observed between the two groups (p = .057). Prescribed insulin dosages were higher in the inpatient group at treatment initiation (p < .001) and remained higher after 3 years (p < 0.003) compared to the outpatient group. Pediatric patients initially treated in an inpatient setting had poorer glycemic control and higher prescribed insulin dosing at baseline. After 3 years, there was no significant difference in HbA1c levels, but patients treated as inpatients continued to have higher prescribed insulin. These findings suggest that the severity of diabetes at initial presentation may affect long-term clinical outcomes in children with T2DM.

Are New Ultra-Rapid-Acting Insulins Associated with Improved Glycemic Control and Reduced Hypoglycemia in Comparison to Conventional Rapid-Acting Insulins for Individuals with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of ultra-rapid-acting insulin analogs (URAIs; faster aspart [FAsp], ultra-rapid lispro [URLi], and technosphere insulin [TI]) with rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAI) in individuals with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: Searching for randomized control trial comparing the effects of URAI versus RAI that lasted at least 12 weeks, we initially selected 15 studies for analysis. Three studies involving TI were excluded due to a high degree of heterogeneity. The final meta-analysis included only 12 studies with either FAsp or URLi. Results: Mealtime URAI significantly reduced overall early 1 h postprandial glycemia in individuals with T1D (-20.230 mg/dL [95% confidence interval, 95% CI -24.040 to -16.421]; P < 0.001; I2 = 33.42%) and those with T2D (-9.138 mg/dL [95% CI -12.612 to -5.663]; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%). However, the significant reduction in 2 h postprandial glucose remained only in individuals with T1D (-17.620 mg/dL [95% CI -26.047 to -9.193]; P < 0.001; I2 = 65.88%). These benefits were lost when URAI was administered postmeal. At 24-26 weeks, there was no significant difference in HbA1c between groups, but at 52 weeks, a slight reduction in HbA1c with mealtime URAI was observed (-0.080% [95% CI -0.147 to -0.013]; P = 0.019; I2 = 0%). No difference in weight or the rate of severe or confirmed hypoglycemia was observed. Only individuals with T1D showed a small, but significant increase in early 1-h hypoglycemia with URAI (1.468 [95% CI 1.235 to 1.747]; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%). Conclusion: Mealtime URAI improves 1 and 2 h postprandial glycemic control compared to RAI without increasing hypoglycemia or weight gain.

Effect of steviol glycosides as natural sweeteners on glucose metabolism in adult participants.

Steviol glycosides (SGs) are recognized as safe natural sweeteners; however, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed an inconclusive effect of SGs on glucose metabolism in adult participants. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to assess the effect of SGs on glucose metabolism. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE to include eligible RCTs. Our primary outcomes were differences between SGs and the control group with respect to changes in blood glucose from the baseline to the end of intervention (including fasting blood glucose [FBG], and HbA1c measurements). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for data synthesis to calculate the pooled mean difference (MD). There were twelve RCTs included for analyses with a total of 871 participants (48% females). A significant effect of SGs on FBG (MD = -4.10 mg dl-1, 95% CI -6.55 to -1.65) was found, while no significant difference in HbA1c (MD = 0.01%, 95% CI -0.12% to 0.13%) was observed between SGs and controls. The whole quality of evidence was rated as low. Subgroup analyses demonstrated favorable effects of SGs on FBG in participants aged ≤50 years, those without diabetes mellitus (DM) or hypertension at the baseline, and overweight and obese adults. Sensitivity analyses yielded results largely similar to the main findings. To conclude, SGs are found to produce significant improvement in glucose metabolism in adult participants when compared with the control. More evidence is required to further clarify and support the benefit of SGs as a sugar substitute for glucose metabolism.

Evaluating the Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Semaglutide in Individuals with Uncontrolled Type2 Diabetes. Real-World Evidence from Saudi Arabia: The Observational, Multicenter, 15-Month EVOLUTION Study.

This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of semaglutide, administered either by weekly subcutaneous (SC) injection or orally, in real-life practice in Saudi Arabia in individuals with type2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A retrospective chart review study was conducted at 18 Saudi Arabia centers. An accredited centralized institutional review board approved the study. Medical records were included for individuals of any age ≥ 18years with uncontrolled T2DM. The primary outcome measure was the laboratory glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level.Secondary measures included fasting blood glucose (FBG), weight, and hypoglycemia. All variables were checked after 6 and 12months of semaglutide initiation. The analysis of this study included 1223 patients with uncontrolled T2DM (HbA1c > 7%). The mean (SD) baseline HbA1c was 10.02% (1.17). HbA1c was reduced by an average of 3.02% (0.84) and 3.17% (0.84) at 6 and 12months, respectively. Results of a repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated significant differences in HbA1c (pvalue < 0.001). HbA1c levels at 6 and 12months were significantly lower, 7.00% (0.70) and 6.85% (0.69), than at baseline, 10.02% (1.17). About 193 patients (56.4%) of the 295 patients having HbA1c < 9% achieved HbA1c of 5.7% or less. The frequency of hypoglycemia events was 4.60 (1.10) in the 3months before semaglutide was initiated. The frequency of hypoglycemia events in the last 3months was 2.30 (0.80) events and 0.80 (0.50) events at 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits, respectively. The percent reduction in body mass index (BMI) was an average of 13.07% (1.53) and 19.89% (4.07) at 6 and 12months, respectively. Lipid profile and blood pressure were improved at 6 and 12months. Semaglutide, administered either by SC injection or orally, provided substantial glycemic and weight-loss benefits in adults with T2DM.

THU426 Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing The Efficacy Of Teriparatide, Zoledronate And Denosumab In Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus At High Risk Of Fragility Fractures: 6-month Interim Analysis Of HR-pQCT Parameters

Abstract Disclosure: R. Pal: None. T.N. Prasad: None. S.K. Bhadada: None. V. Singla: None. S. Ram: None. N. Aggarwal: None. A. Kumar: None. People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at high-risk of fragility fractures, however, there are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy/safety of anti-osteoporosis drugs as a primary endpoint in T2D (1). To address this lacuna, we conducted a pilot prospective, open-labeled, blinded-end point (PROBE) RCT (CTRI/2022/02/039978) wherein consecutive postmenopausal female (≥ 50 years) with T2D (duration ≥ 5 years) were screened. Subjects with HbA1c 7-10%, eGFR &amp;gt; 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 and prior history of vertebral (clinical/morphometric), hip, radius, humeral fragility fracture or at high-risk of fragility fractures [defined as areal bone mineral density (BMD) T-score (adjusted for diabetes) at lumbar spine/femoral neck ≤ -2.5 and high FRAX score] and without any secondary cause of osteoporosis were randomised in staggered fashion in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive either daily teriparatide, yearly zoledronate, biannually denosumab (in addition to standard of care, i.e., calcium 1000 mg/day and cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day) or only standard of care (control). The primary end points were change in areal BMD and frequency of incident fractures at 18 months. The secondary end point was change in HR-pQCT parameters measured at distal radius and distal tibia (XtremeCT II, SCANCO Medical AG, Switzerland) at 6 and 18 months.Out of 412 participants who were screened, 104 subjects were randomized to any of the 4 arms. Out of these 104 subjects, 53 have completed 6 months of follow-up (teriparatide n=14, zoledronate n=14, denosumab n=15, control n=10). There were no statistically significant differences in age, HbA1c, eGFR, calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, procollagen type I N-propeptide (PINP), C-terminal telopeptide (CTX), areal BMD, trabecular bone score (TBS), FRAX score or HR-pQCT parameters between the 4 groups at randomisation. At 6 months, there was no significant difference in HbA1c between the 4 groups; PINP and CTX rise was significantly higher in teriparatide arm compared to zoledronate, denosumab or control arms. With regard to HR-pQCT, there were no statistically significant differences in total [total volumetric BMD (vBMD), bone volume fraction], cortical (vBMD, thickness, porosity, pore diameter), or trabecular (vBMD, thickness, number, separation) bone properties at the distal radius and distal tibia between the 4 arms at 6 months of follow-up. To conclude, zoledronate, denosumab or teriparatide were unable to induce any significant microarchitectural changes than standard of care in postmenopausal women with T2D at high-risk of fragility fractures following 6 months of treatment. Longer duration of treatment and follow-up of the cohort is required to arrive at robust conclusions. Reference: (1) Pal et al., Bone fragility in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a lot left to explore. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022;18:651-651 Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

Optimising blood glucose control with portioned meal box in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a randomised control trial.

The impact of dietary factors on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is well established. However, the effectiveness of transforming portion control into a practical innovation for glycaemic control in T2DM has not yet been established for counselling in nutrition. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of general counselling in nutrition (GCN) and a portioned meal box (PMB) on fasting blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body composition. A randomised, parallel intervention trial was conducted over 12 weeks, with GCN: carbohydrate portion control concept by using food exchange lists (n = 25) and PMB: portioned meal box was set by energy requirements (n = 25). Both GCN and PMB demonstrated reductions in HbA1c levels at the 6th and 12th weeks compared to baseline. However, no significant difference in HbA1c was observed between GCN and PMB at either the 6th or 12th week. Using PMB at least four times a week significantly decreased HbA1c during the intervention period (p = 0.021 and p < 0.001 for weeks 6 and 12 when compared with baseline, respectively). Changes in body composition were observed: body weight decrease in PMB only, body fat decrease and constant muscle mass in both groups. Both methods tended to relieve hunger and increased satiety in both groups. The satisfaction evaluation showed that participants preferred to use PMB over GCN (p = 0.001). Additionally, participants consumed less energy, carbohydrate and fat in PMB (p = 0.001, p = 0.019, and p = 0.001, respectively) and less energy and fat in GCN (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively). A better diet, either through GCN or PMB, can play an important role in improving dietary intake compliance and controlling blood glucose.

Effects of Arm Swing Exercise Program on HbA1C and Nutritional Status in Adults and Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Abstract Regular physical activity is recommended for managing type-2 diabetes to achieve optimal glycemic control. Limited studies compared the effects of exercise between adults and older adults with type-2 diabetes. This quasi-experimental aim to investigate the effects of the Arm Swing Exercise Program on HbA1C and nutritional status among four groups of adults and older adults with type-2 diabetes. Eighty eligible participants were assigned to the experimental groups (20 adults and 21 older adults) receiving the 12-week Arm Swing Exercise Program 30 minutes/day 5 day/week along with standard care, whereas the control groups (17 adults and 22 older adults) received standard care. Data were obtained, using the demographics questionnnaire, HbA1C, and nutritional status including waist circumference, body mass index, visceral fat, and skeletal muscle, before and after the Program. Paired t-tests, ANCOVA, and ANOVA were used for data analysis. The findings revealed no significant difference in HbA1C, waist circumference, body mass index, visceral fat, and skeletal muscle after receiving the Program between adults and older adults in the experimental groups. Older adults in the experimental group had significantly lower waist circumference than older adults in the control group, while adults in the experimental group had significantly lower waist circumference than adults and older adults in the control groups. This program was effective in only waist circumference reduction. Thus, nurses should encourage people with type-2 diabetes to continuously practice both the arm swing exercise and standard care to achieve glycemic control and better nutritional status. Further study should have more participants using randomized controlled trials and control other sensitive outcomes to the arm swing exercise. Keywords: Arm swing exercise, Hemoglobin A1C, Nutritional status, Adults, Older adults, exercise

HbA1C, proliferative and non-proliferative retinopathy in diabetic patients

BackgroundRetinopathy is one of the most common microvascular complications caused by diabetes, which occurs due to changes in blood capillaries. One of the most important factors to determine the progression of retinopathy is measuring HbA1C. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between glycosylated hemoglobin levels, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), and triglycerides with DRP in the population of diabetic patients. MethodsThis descriptive and analytical study was conducted on 80 diabetic patients referred to Hafiz Sabzevar Diabetes Clinic in 1400. Based on fundoscopic examination, patients were divided into three general categories: patients without retinopathy, patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and patients with non-proliferative retinopathy. Patient information was collected through a demographic questionnaire (including age, sex, insulin or oral drug use, and fasting blood sugar level) and a researcher-made checklist (including HbA1C, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and triglycerides). Data were analyzed with spss 28. Descriptive statistical tests, ANOVA and Bonferroni's post hoc test were used for analysis. ResultsThe results of the study showed that there is a significant difference in HbA1C, SBP and DBP levels between the three groups (P = 0.000). Post Hoc (Bonferroni) test was used to accurately determine this significant difference. The data showed that both retinopathy groups (NPDR and PDR) had higher levels of HbA1C and blood pressure (SBP and DBP) compared to the non-retinopathy group and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.000). However, there was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of triglyceride levels (P = 0.96). ConclusionHigh levels of glycosylated hemoglobin, systolic and diastolic blood pressure play an important role in the occurrence of diabetic retinopathy. Therefore, it is recommended to carefully control blood sugar and blood pressure of diabetic patients in order to prevent the occurrence of retinopathy.

Twice-daily injections and multiple daily injections of insulin in toddlers with type 1 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.

Twice-daily injections and multiple daily injections of insulin in toddlers with type 1 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.

Providing Diabetes Education through Phone Calls Assisted in the Better Control of Hyperglycemia and Improved the Knowledge of Patients on Diabetes Management.

Purpose: A recent single-arm pilot study from our group showed a significant decrease in HbA1C in Type-2 diabetes individuals provided with SMS and phone call-based education on glycemic control. Considering the preference of participants to phone call-based education, a randomized control trial (RCT) with parallel design was conducted to determine the impact of phone call-based diabetes educational intervention on the control of hyperglycemia and improvement in the knowledge about diabetes management. Objectives: To determine the impact of phone call-based educational intervention on the control of hyperglycemia and improvement in the knowledge about diabetes management. Methodology: The study was conducted for a period of 12 months on a total of 273 Type-2 diabetic patients (interventional group (n = 135); non-interventional group (n = 138)) who had provided consent to participate. Subjects in the case group received weekly phone calls on diabetes education; whereas the control group received no education. HbA1C investigations were carried out at baseline and at every fourth month until the completion of the study period for the subjects in both the groups. The impact of phone call-based education was measured by comparing HbA1C values as well as by measuring the questionnaire-based knowledge scores on diabetes management. Results: At the end of the study period, there was a significant reduction in HbA1C in 58.8% participants (n = 65) and a manifold (2-5-fold) increase in knowledge on diabetes management among participants in the case group (n = 110). However, no significant difference in HbA1C and knowledge score was observed in participants from the control group (n = 115). Conclusion: Phone call-based diabetes education is a viable option to empower patients for better management of Type-2 diabetes.

Efficacy of subgingival minocycline hydrochloride delivery as an adjunct to non-surgical mechanical debridement for the treatment of peri-implantitis in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus.

The aim was to assess the efficacy of subgingival minocycline hydrochloride (MH) delivery with non-surgical mechanical debridement (NSMD) for treating peri-implantitis in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Type-2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients with peri-implantitis were included. In the test-group, patients underwent NSMD with a single session of MH delivery. In the control-group, patients underwent NSMD alone. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), modified plaque-index (mPI), modified gingival index (mGI), probing-depth (PD) and crestal bone loss (CBL) were measured at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. Level of significance was set at p<0.01. Thirty type-2 diabetic and 30 healthy individuals with peri-implantitis were included. There was a significant reduction in mPI (p<0.01), PD (p<0.01) and mGI (p<0.01) at 6 months among patients with and without type-2 DM in the test and control groups. There was no significant difference in peri-implant parameters in all patients at the 6-month follow-up. There was no significant difference in HbA1c and CBL among patients with and without type-2 DM in the test and control groups when baseline values were compared with those at 6 months of follow-up. A single application of subgingival MH delivery is as effective as NSMD alone for the treatment of peri-implantitis in type-2 diabetic patients.

Polymorphisms in the Renin-Angiotensin System and eNOS Glu298Asp Genes Are Associated with Increased Risk for Essential Hypertension in a Mexican Population.

Essential hypertension is the result of modifiable and genetic factors, and it is associated with increased risk for atherothrombosis. Some polymorphisms are associated with hypertensive disease. The objective was to analyze the association between eNOS Glu298Asp, MTHR C677T, AGT M235T, AGT T174M, and A1166C and ACE I/D polymorphisms with essential hypertension in the Mexican population. In the present study, 224 patients with essential hypertension and 208 subjects without hypertension were included. The Glu298Asp, C677T, M235T, T174M, A1166C, and I/D polymorphisms were determined by the PCR-RFLP technique. We found statistical differences in age, gender, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol between control and cases. However, we found no significant differences in HbA1c and triglycerides between both groups. We observed statistical significant differences in the genotype distribution of Glu298Asp (P = 0.001), I/D (P = 0.02), and M235T (P = 0.004) polymorphisms between both groups. In contrast, there were no differences related to distribution of genotypes of MTHFR C677T (P = 0.12), M174T (P = 0.46), and A1166C (P = 0.85) between cases and control groups. We identified that Glu298Asp, I/D, and M234T polymorphisms represented an increased risk for essential hypertension and those genetic variants could contribute to the presence of endothelial dysfunction and vasopressor effect, hyperplasia, and hypertrophy of smooth muscle cells, which had an impact for hypertension. In contrast, we found no association between C677C, M174T, and A1166C polymorphisms and hypertensive disease. We suggested that those genetic variants could be identified in individuals with high risk to avoid hypertension and thrombotic disease.

The Efficacy and Frequency of Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose in Non-insulin-Treated T2D Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is a useful tool in diabetes management, but its efficacy and optimal application in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients treated without insulin have been controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SMBG in controlling blood glucose levels in non-insulin-treated T2D patients and to determine the optimal frequency and the most appropriate population to benefit from SMBG. Eligible publications from January 2000 to April 2022 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing SMBG with no SMBG or structured SMBG (S-SMBG, SMBG with defined timing and frequency of glucose measurements) were included. Meta-analyses and sub-analyses were performed to assess the efficacy, optimal frequency, and most appropriate population for SMBG. Risk of bias was assessed regarding randomization, allocation sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other biases. Twenty-two studies involving 6204 participants were identified, including 17 comparing SMBG with no SMBG and 4 comparing SMBG with S-SMBG. SMBG reduced HbA1c (MD -0.30%, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.17) compared with no SMBG, and S-SMBG performed better than SMBG (MD -0.23%, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.07). Subgroup analyses showed that HbA1c control was better with SMBG at 8-11 times weekly (MD -0.35%, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.20) compared with other frequencies and with lifestyle adjustments (MD -0.37%, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.23) than with no adjustments. No significant differences in HbA1c were observed between baseline HbA1c subgroups (≤ 8% and > 8%, P = 0.63) and between diabetes duration subgroups (≤ 6 years and > 6 years, P = 0.72), respectively. SMBG was effective for controlling HbA1c in non-insulin-treated T2D patients, although lacking detailed monitoring design. Better outcomes were seen with SMBG at 8-11 times weekly and lifestyle adjustment based on SMBG results. PROSPERO (CRD42021285604).

The Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on the Incidence of Type 1 DM and the Glycemic Control of Diabetic Children: Findings from a Teaching Hospital, Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated glycemic control among T1DM pediatric patients attending the endocrinology pediatrics clinics at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU) prior to and during COVID-19 restraining regulations. In addition, we assessed the trends and variations in the incidence of T1DM during 2017-2021, including the COVID-19 years by identifying newly diagnosed patients presenting to pediatrics emergency department (ED) in KFHU. METHODS: To estimate the effect of COVID-19 on the incidence of T1DM, we identified newly diagnosed cases of T1DM among pediatric patients attending the ED during the years 2017- 2021. The participants' data were collected through electronic medical records. Information collected included patient age, sex, and HbA1c readings. Three HbA1c readings of interest that were defined and collected are pre-COVID reading, in-COVID reading, and post-COVID reading. RESULTS: The difference of female participants' readings was statistically non-significant (Z= -0.416, p = 0.678), with a pre- and post-COVID median of 10.70 (Q1= 9.00, Q3= 12.15), and 10.50 (Q1= 8.80, Q3= 12.35), respectively. In contrast, the difference was statistically significant among male participants (Z= -2.334, p = 0.02), with a pre- and post-COVID median of 10.20 (Q1= 8.70, Q3= 11.80), and 10.65 (Q1= 9.00, Q3= 12.70), respectively. There was a statistically significant increase in HbA1c of persons > 11 years old (Z= -2.471, p= 0.013), with a pre- and post-COVID median of 10.40 (Q1= 9.00, Q3= 12.10), and 10.90 (Q1= 9.00, Q3= 12.60), respectively. Conversely, persons ≤ 11 years old showed no statistically significant change in HbA1c (Z= -.457, p= 0.648), with a pre- and post-COVID median of 10.45 (Q1= 8.70, Q3= 11.85), and 10.20 (Q1= 8.40, Q3= 12.075), respectively. Disregarding any influence of time, the effect of sex showed no statistically significant difference in HbA1c between males and females [F (1,125) = 0.008, p = 0.930]. Meanwhile, the age effect on HbA1c, regardless of time influence, was statistically significant [F (1,125) = 4.993, p = 0.027]. There was no statistically significant interaction between time and sex on HbA1c levels [F (1.74, 217) = 0.096, p = 0.883] and between age and time [F (3.92,289.57) = 1.693, p = 0.190]. CONCLUSIONS: The number of visits to healthcare facilities dropped significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the rate of newly diagnosed T1DM increased. There was a variable effect on HbA1c levels of those patients, which suggests that each demographic group in the population might have been affected differently by the pandemic. Future research should determine factors associated with better glycemic control and measures to sustain these changes the pandemic might have created.

Canakinumab in patients with COVID-19 and type 2 diabetes - A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

SummaryBackgroundPatients with type 2 diabetes and obesity have chronic activation of the innate immune system possibly contributing to the higher risk of hyperinflammatory response to SARS-CoV2 and severe COVID-19 observed in this population. We tested whether interleukin-1β (IL-1β) blockade using canakinumab improves clinical outcome.MethodsCanCovDia was a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of canakinumab plus standard-of-care compared with placebo plus standard-of-care in patients with type 2 diabetes and a BMI > 25 kg/m2 hospitalised with SARS-CoV2 infection in seven tertiary-hospitals in Switzerland. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a single intravenous dose of canakinumab (body weight adapted dose of 450-750 mg) or placebo. Canakinumab and placebo were compared based on an unmatched win-ratio approach based on length of survival, ventilation, ICU stay and hospitalization at day 29. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04510493.FindingsBetween October 17, 2020, and May 12, 2021, 116 patients were randomly assigned with 58 in each group. One participant dropped out in each group for the primary analysis. At the time of randomization, 85 patients (74·6 %) were treated with dexamethasone. The win-ratio of canakinumab vs placebo was 1·08 (95 % CI 0·69-1·69; p = 0·72). During four weeks, in the canakinumab vs placebo group 4 (7·0%) vs 7 (12·3%) participants died, 11 (20·0 %) vs 16 (28·1%) patients were on ICU, 12 (23·5 %) vs 11 (21·6%) were hospitalised for more than 3 weeks, respectively. Median ventilation time at four weeks in the canakinumab vs placebo group was 10 [IQR 6.0, 16.5] and 16 days [IQR 14.0, 23.0], respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c after four weeks despite a lower number of anti-diabetes drug administered in patients treated with canakinumab. Finally, high-sensitive CRP and IL-6 was lowered by canakinumab. Serious adverse events were reported in 13 patients (11·4%) in each group.InterpretationIn patients with type 2 diabetes who were hospitalised with COVID-19, treatment with canakinumab in addition to standard-of-care did not result in a statistically significant improvement of the primary composite outcome. Patients treated with canakinumab required significantly less anti-diabetes drugs to achieve similar glycaemic control. Canakinumab was associated with a prolonged reduction of systemic inflammation.FundingSwiss National Science Foundation grant #198415 and University of Basel. Novartis supplied study medication.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Insulin Administration and Blood Glucose Monitoring Methods in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Children.

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of different insulin administration methods and blood glucose monitoring methods in treating type 1 diabetes mellitus in children. Methods Patients were divided into four groups: multiple daily injection (MDI) + fingertip blood glucose detection, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) + fingertip blood glucose detection, MDI + continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS), and CSII + CGMS. After six months of treatment, followed by telephone and at least once a month in an outpatient clinic, insulin doses were adjusted according to the children's blood glucose levels. Blood glucose control and the daily dose of insulin were compared among the four groups after treatment, and the incidence of hypoglycemia in each group was recorded during the treatment. We also compare the incidence of the adverse event among the four groups. Results 6 months later, the levels of HbA1c, FBG, and two h PG in each group were lower than those before treatment. There were significant differences in HbA1c, two h PG, and the daily insulin dose among the four groups. There were differences in the frequency of hypoglycemia among all the groups. The frequency of hypoglycemia in groups C and D was lower than in group A. Conclusions CSII was better than MDI, and the blood glucose monitoring effect of CGMS was better than the fingertip blood glucose detection. The patients treated with CSII combined with CGMS had the best clinical efficacy. The patients treated with CSII combined with CGMS had the lowest adverse events incidence.