Significant Difference In Diagnostic Yield Research Articles

Added Value of a Robotic-assisted Bronchoscopy Platform in Cone Beam Computed Tomography-guided Bronchoscopy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Parenchymal Lesions.

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided bronchoscopic sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) is associated with superior diagnostic outcomes. However, the added value of a robotic-assisted bronchoscopy platform in CBCT-guided diagnostic procedures is unknown. We performed a retrospective review of 100 consecutive PPLs sampled using conventional flexible bronchoscopy under CBCT guidance (FB-CBCT) and 100 consecutive PPLs sampled using an electromagnetic navigation-guided robotic-assisted bronchoscopy platform under CBCT guidance (RB-CBCT). Patient demographics, PPL features, procedural characteristics, and procedural outcomes were compared between the 2 cohorts. Patient and PPL characteristics were similar between the FB-CBCT and RB-CBCT cohorts, and there were no significant differences in diagnostic yield (88% vs. 90% for RB-CBCT, P=0.822) or incidence of complications between the 2 groups. As compared with FB-CBCT cases, RB-CBCT cases were significantly shorter (median 58 min vs. 92 min, P<0.0001) and used significantly less diagnostic radiation (median dose area product 5114 µGy•m2 vs. 8755 µGy•m2, P<0.0001). CBCT-guided bronchoscopy with or without a robotic-assisted bronchoscopy platform is a safe and effective method for sampling PPLs, although the integration of a robotic-assisted platform was associated with significantly shorter procedure times and significantly less radiation exposure.

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial miniforceps biopsy an urban center experience.

The role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in staging mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is well established. However, evidence of its diagnostic utility in other pathologies-such as lymphoma-remains inadequate. This retrospective observational study aims to determine the diagnostic yield of EBUS-guided miniforceps biopsy (EBUS-MFB) compared to EBUS-TBNA in both malignant and nonmalignant conditions. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional chart review of all adult patients referred for EBUS at our institution between January 2019 and December 2022. All patients who underwent both EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-MFB were included, with some patients also undergoing transbronchial cryobiopsy. Patients without pathology reports available were excluded. The combination of EBUS-MFB and EBUS-TBNA had the highest percentage of diagnostic results both in the overall cohort (34.4%) and in patients who did not undergo transbronchial cryobiopsy (46.2%). EBUS-MFB alone yielded more diagnostic results compared to EBUS-TBNA. Transbronchial cryobiopsy was the sampling method with the highest percentage of diagnostic results in the cryobiopsy group (64.5%). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in diagnostic yield between EBUS-MFB and EBUS-TBNA (P<0.001), with EBUS-MFB showing a higher diagnostic yield overall. EBUS-MFB had a significantly higher diagnostic yield than EBUS-TBNA in benign cases, in patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis, but not in malignant disease. Our study suggests that combining EBUS-MFB with EBUS-TBNA can improve the diagnostic yield, particularly in benign cases and sarcoidosis. These findings support the potential superiority of adding EBUS-MFB over EBUS-TBNA alone and highlight the need for further randomized control trials to validate these results. The retrospective nature of this study and certain limitations, such as the lack of adequate longer-term follow-up, selection and operator biases, and the absence of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in some cases, should be considered when interpreting the results. Nonetheless, this study contributes to the growing evidence for the utility of EBUS-MFB in improving the diagnostic yield of EBUS procedures in specific clinical scenarios.

Safety and Efficacy of CT-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Suspicious Subcentimeter Pelvic and Retroperitoneal Lymph Nodes Detected by 11C-Choline PET in Patients With Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND. In patients with prostate cancer, PET using targeted radiotracers can identify increased activity in small morphologically normal lymph nodes, facilitating earlier detection of metastatic disease. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to assess the efficacy and safety of CT-guided biopsy of suspicious pelvic and retroperitoneal lymph nodes measuring smaller than 1 cm detected by 11C-choline PET in patients with prostate cancer, with comparison with nodes measuring 1 cm or larger. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients with prostate cancer who underwent CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of suspicious pelvic or retroperitoneal lymph nodes detected by 11C-choline PET/CT or PET/MRI (performed because of a rising or elevated PSA level or known recurrent or metastatic disease) between June 1, 2012, and March 20, 2020. Patient, lymph node, and procedural characteristics, as well as biopsy outcomes and complications, were recorded. Biopsies of lymph nodes measuring smaller than 1 cm and of lymph nodes measuring 1 cm and larger were compared. RESULTS. A total of 269 patients (mean age, 68.7 ± 6.8 [SD] years) were included. A total of 156 patients underwent biopsy of lymph nodes measuring smaller than 1 cm (range, 3-9 mm); 113 patients underwent biopsy of lymph nodes measuring 1 cm or larger (range, 10-35 mm). Lymph nodes smaller than 1 cm and lymph nodes 1 cm and larger showed no significant difference in diagnostic yield (89.7% vs 92.9%; p = .40). Diagnostic yield was not significantly different between nodes smaller than 1 cm and nodes 1 cm and larger for any individual anatomic location within the pelvis or retroperitoneum (all p > .05). Malignant yield was lower for nodes smaller than 1 cm than for nodes 1 cm and larger (44.9% vs 63.7%; p = .003). The single biopsied 3-mm node had a nondiagnostic specimen. Diagnostic yield and malignant yield were 100.0% and 40.0%, respectively, for 4-mm nodes, and 95.5% and 45.5%, respectively, for 5-mm nodes. Patients with nodes smaller than 1 cm and nodes 1 cm and larger showed no significant difference in minor (12.8% vs 7.1%; p = .16) or major (0.6% vs 2.7%; p = .31) complication rate. CONCLUSION. The findings support the safety and efficacy of CT-guided biopsy of suspicious subcentimeter pelvic and retroperitoneal lymph nodes detected on 11C-choline PET in patients with prostate cancer. CLINICAL IMPACT. Earlier diagnosis of metastatic lymphadenopathy will impact prognostic assessment and management decisions in patients with recurrent prostate cancer.

Ultrathin Bronchoscopy for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Ultrathin bronchoscopy (external diameter, ≤3.5 mm) is useful for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions because of its good accessibility. Objectives: We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic yield of ultrathin bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Methods: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (from inception to May 2021), and meta-analysis was performed using R software. The diagnostic yield was evaluated by dividing the number of successful diagnoses by the total number of lesions, and subgroup analysis was performed to identify related factors. Results: Nineteen studies with a total of 1,977 peripheral pulmonary lesions were included. The pooled diagnostic yield of ultrathin bronchoscopy was 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.60–0.70). Significant heterogeneity was observed among studies (χ², 87.75; p < 0.01; I², 79.5%). In a subgroup analysis, ultrathin bronchoscopy with 1.2 mm channel size showed a diagnostic yield of 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.53–0.68), whereas ultrathin bronchoscopy with 1.7 mm channel size showed 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.66–0.74) (χ², 5.35; p = 0.02). In addition, there was a significant difference in diagnostic yield based on lesion size, histologic diagnosis (malignant vs. benign), bronchus sign, and lesion location from the hilum, whereas no significant difference was found based on lobar location. The overall complication rate of ultrathin bronchoscopy was 2.7% (pneumothorax, 1.1%). Conclusions: Ultrathin bronchoscopy is an excellent tool for peripheral pulmonary lesion diagnosis with a low complication rate. The diagnostic yield of ultrathin bronchoscopy was significantly higher with larger channel size, which might be attributed to the availability of radial endobronchial ultrasound.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic healthcare restrictions on utilisation and diagnostic yield of outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Kentucky prohibited elective medical procedures from 3/18/2020-4/27/2020. We sought to determine if cessation of elective procedures in Kentucky during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a decrease in the proportion of rarely appropriate outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms interpreted at the open echocardiography lab at Norton Children's Hospital. A retrospective chart review was conducted comparing proportions of rarely appropriate outpatient paediatric transthoracic echocardiograms performed pre-COVID (3/21/2019-4/28/2019) and during COVID (3/19/2020-4/27/2020). Transthoracic echocardiogram indication was determined by chart review and echocardiogram reports. Indication appropriateness was evaluated using paediatric appropriate use criteria for initial outpatient transthoracic echocardiogram or CHD follow-up as applicable. Of transthoracic echocardiograms pre-COVID, 100 (37.7%) were rarely appropriate versus 18 (20.2%) during COVID. Pre-COVID, paediatric cardiologists tended to order fewer rarely appropriate transthoracic echocardiograms than paediatricians (35.9% versus 46.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Cardiologists ordered the majority of outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms during COVID (77/89, 86.5%), limiting the ability to compare transthoracic echocardiogram indications by provider type. There was no significant difference in diagnostic yield of initial outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms with (13.0%) abnormal studies pre-COVID versus 7 (15.5%) during COVID. While elective procedures were prohibited in Kentucky during the COVID-19 pandemic, a decrease in the proportion of rarely appropriate outpatient paediatric transthoracic echocardiograms was observed. There was no significant difference in diagnostic yield of initial outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms between time periods, suggesting that clinically significant echocardiogram findings were still detected despite more prudent utilisation of echocardiography during this time.

Helical CT versus intermittent CT fluoroscopic guidance for musculoskeletal needle biopsies: impact on radiation exposure, procedure time, diagnostic yield, and adverse events.

Image-guided percutaneous needle biopsies are essential in the workup of musculoskeletal (MSK) lesions. While helical CT (HCT) is well established, intermittent CT fluoroscopy (iCTF) is an increasingly used alternative. The purpose of this study is to establish whether differences in subject radiation exposure, procedure time, yield, or adverse events exist between HCT and iCTF guidance. This retrospective cohort study included consecutive MSK needle biopsies performed on a single-CT scanner over a 12-month period at a tertiary academic center. Subject demographics, radiation dose, and outcomes were abstracted from the medical record. Comparisons between the two cohorts were performed using Student's t-test for continuous data and using Fisher's exact test for categorical data and a two-tailed p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Two hundred sixteen adults (115 (53.2%) females) with a mean age of 58.8 ± 18.4years, underwent 216 biopsies (109 (50.5%) HCT guided, 107 (49.5%) iCTF guided) between June 2017 and June 2018. Dose-length product (DLP) and volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) were significantly higher for the HCT cohort (HCT 698.9 ± 400.8 mGycm vs iCTF 312.8 ± 170.8 mGycm; p < 0.005 and HCT 19.1mGy ± 8.8 vs iCTF 6.9mGy ± 1.5, p < 0.001). No significant difference in diagnostic yield, procedure time, or adverse event rate was identified. For CT-guided MSK needle biopsies, iCTF decreases subject radiation dose compared to HCT without negatively affecting outcomes. iCTF should be strongly considered by radiologists performing MSK biopsies given the reduced patient radiation exposure.

Diagnostic Yield of Serial Pancreatic Juice Aspiration Cytologic Examination With Brush Cytology for Pancreatic Ductal Stenosis

Serial pancreatic-juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE) is useful for diagnosis of pancreatic ductal stenosis. This study investigates the utility of adding brush cytology to SPACE during the same procedure. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent SPACE with brush cytology for pancreatic ductal stenosis between February 2014 and July 2020 in our hospital. Thirty-four patients were included. Eleven had lesions in the pancreatic head lesions, and 23 had lesions in the pancreatic body or tail. Malignancies were found in 22 patients. Endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging showed distal pancreatic duct dilation in 81.8% to 90.6% of cases, with a sensitivity of 63.0% to 65.5%. The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of SPACE, brush cytology, and SPACE with brush cytology were 63.6%, 50.0%, and 77.3% (P = 0.19) and 73.5%, 67.6%, and 82.4% (P = 0.42), respectively. No significant differences in diagnostic yield were observed for either pancreatic head lesions or pancreatic body/tail lesions. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis was observed in 4 cases (11.8%). The utility of adding brush cytology to SPACE was limited.

Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy: A Retrospective Bicentric Study Using the Olympus 1.5 mm Mini-Forceps.

When evaluating mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy (LAD) or masses, guidelines recommend endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) as an initial technique for tissue analysis and diagnosis. However, owing to the small sample size obtained by needle aspiration, its diagnostic yield (DY) is limited. EBUS transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB) used as a complimentary technique to EBUS-TBNA might allow for better histopathological evaluation, thus improving DY. In this retrospective bicentric study, we assessed the DY and safety of an EBUS-guided 1.5 mm mini-forceps biopsy combined with EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of mediastinal/hilar LAD or masses compared to EBUS-TBNA alone. In total, 105 patients were enrolled. The overall DY was 61.9% and 85.7% for TBNA alone and EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-TBFB, respectively (p < 0.001). While the combined approach was associated with a significantly higher DY for lung cancer diagnosis (97.1% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.016) and sarcoidosis (85.2% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.001), no significant differences in DY were calculated for subgroups with smaller sample sizes such as lymphoma. No major adverse events were observed. Using a 1.5 mm mini-forceps is a safe and feasible technique for biopsy of mediastinal or hilar LAD or masses with superior overall DY compared to EBUS-TBNA as a standalone technique.

A Comparation Between Frame-Based and Robot-Assisted in Stereotactic Biopsy.

IntroductionFrame-based stereotactic biopsy is well-established to play an essential role in neurosurgery. In recent years, different robotic devices have been introduced in neurosurgery centers. This study aimed to compare the SINO surgical robot-assisted frameless brain biopsy with standard frame-based stereotactic biopsy in terms of efficacy, accuracy and complications.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 151 consecutive patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy at Chongqing Sanbo Jiangling Hospital between August 2017 and December 2021. All patients were divided into the frame-based group (n = 47) and the SINO surgical robot-assisted group (n = 104). The data collected included clinical characteristics, diagnostic yield, operation times, accuracy, and postoperative complications.ResultsThere was no significant difference in diagnostic yield between the frame-based group and the SINO surgical robot-assisted group (95.74 vs. 98.08%, p > 0.05). The mean operation time in the SINO surgical robot-assisted group was significantly shorter than in the frame-based group (29.36 ± 13.64 vs. 50.57 ± 41.08 min). The entry point error in the frame-based group was significantly higher than in the robot-assisted group [1.33 ± 0.40 mm (0.47–2.30) vs. 0.92 ± 0.27 mm (0.35–1.65), P < 0.001]. The target point error in the frame-based group was also significantly higher than in the robot-assisted group [1.63 ± 0.41 mm (0.74–2.65) vs. 1.10 ± 0.30 mm (0.69–2.03), P < 0.001]. Finally, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups.ConclusionRobot-assisted brain biopsy becomes an increasingly mainstream tool in the neurosurgical procedure. The SINO surgical robot-assisted platform is as efficient, accurate and safe as standard frame-based stereotactic biopsy and provides a reasonable alternative to stereotactic biopsy in neurosurgery.

Prospective randomized trial to compare the safety, diagnostic yield and utility of 22-gauge and 19-gauge endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspirates and processing technique by cytology and histopathology.

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspirate (TBNA) is a widely used method of minimally invasive lymph node sampling. The benefit of processing samples by cytologic methods versus "core biopsy" is unclear. It is unknown if safety or diagnostic yield varies by needle gauge. Between June 2018 and July 2019, 40 patients (56 lesions) undergoing EBUS TBNA lymph node evaluation were enrolled in this single-center prospective trial. Patients were chosen by permuted block randomization to undergo EBUS TBNA starting with 22-gauge (22g) or 19-gauge (19g) needles. Separate samples were sent for processing by cytologic methods and histopathology. Surgical pathologists and cytopathologists were blinded to needle size. The primary endpoint was diagnostic yield. Secondary endpoints compared specimen adequacy by rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE), sample adequacy for molecular testing, sample quality, and safety. Diagnostic yield for histopathologic examination was 87.5% and 83.9% for 19g and 22g respectively (P = 0.625). There was no significant difference in diagnostic yield by cytologic examination based on needle size. There was no significant difference in slide quality. Molecular adequacy for core-biopsy was 77% and 80% for 22g and 19g needles, respectively. Molecular adequacy for cytology cell block was 77% and 80% for 22g and 19g needles, respectively. There were no significant procedural complications. Both the 22g and 19g EBUS TBNA needles provided a similar diagnostic yield and clinical utility for ancillary testing. Processing techniques by cytologic methods or "core biopsy" showed no significant impact in diagnostic yield or utility of molecular testing.

S551 Efficacy and Safety of Double- versus Single-Balloon Retrograde Enteroscopy

Introduction: Previous studies have reported conflicting results on the outcomes of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE). We aimed to compare efficacy and safety of DBE to SBE via retrograde approach. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent retrograde DBE or SBE at a large, tertiary referral center from 2008 to 2018. Data was collected on demographics, baseline comorbidities, antiplatelet and anti-coagulation use. Outcomes assessed included technical success, diagnostic yield, therapeutics, depth of insertion and procedural duration. The analysis was done using SPSS software. Results: A total of 523 (403 DBE, 120 SBE) patients underwent retrograde enteroscopy during the study period. The mean age was 59.4 ± 17.24 and 59.57 ± 16.94 in DBE and SBE group, respectively. There was no difference in gender, comorbidities, smoking history, clopidogrel, anti-coagulation use, platelet count, and laboratory parameters between both groups. Aspirin use was significantly higher in DBE group (40.8% vs. 29.9%, P = 0.03) (Table 1). The indication for enteroscopy was obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) in 66.5% and 55.8% of DBE and SBE procedures, respectively. There was no difference in technical success (91.0% vs. 92.5%, P = 0.85), diagnostic yield (40.9% vs. 40.8%, P = 0.95) and therapeutics (17.1% vs. 19.1%, P = 0.61) between DBE and SBE. Compared to SBE, DBE had significantly shorter mean procedure time (26.5 ± 34.5 min vs. 34.8 ± 29.4 min, P = 0.01) but higher maximal depth of insertion from ileo-cecal valve (108.1 ± 84.1 cm vs. 73.3 ± 63.4 cm, P = 0.001). In addition, proximal ileum was reached in 22.6% of DBE procedure as compared to 6% in SBE (P < 0.001). On subgroup analysis based on OGIB indication, DBE again had significantly higher depth of insertion (113.1 ± 87.07 cm vs. 79.9 ± 66.5 cm, P = 0.02) and rates of proximal ileum reach (23.7% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.006) as compared to SBE but there was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic yield (34.5% vs. 26.9%, P = 0.23) and therapeutics (20.3% vs. 14.9%, P = 0.31). Safety events were rare and similar in both groups (Table 2). Conclusion: Retrograde DBE is associated with significantly higher depth of insertion and shorter procedural duration but similar diagnostic yield and technical success as compared to.Figure:: Baseline and Demographics factors for both groupsTable 2.: Outcomes comparing DBE and SBE

Transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions: a randomised trial.

Guidelines recommend endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) as an initial investigatory technique for mediastinal nodal staging in lung cancer. However, EBUS-TBNA can be limited by the inadequacy of intact tissues, which might restrict its diagnostic yield in mediastinal lesions of certain aetiologies. We have previously shown that EBUS-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy can provide intact samples with greater volume. This randomised study determined the diagnostic yield and safety of transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy monitored by endosonography for the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions. Patients with a mediastinal lesion of ≥1 cm in the short axis were recruited. Following identification of the mediastinal lesion by linear EBUS, fine-needle aspiration and cryobiopsy were sequentially performed in a randomised order. Primary end-points were diagnostic yield, defined as the percentage of patients for whom mediastinal biopsy provided a definite diagnosis, and procedure-related adverse events. In total, 197 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated. The overall diagnostic yield was 79.9% and 91.8% for TBNA and transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy, respectively (p=0.001). Diagnostic yields were similar for metastatic lymphadenopathy (94.1% versus 95.6%, p=0.58), while cryobiopsy was more sensitive than TBNA in uncommon tumours (91.7% versus 25.0%, p=0.001) and benign disorders (80.9% versus 53.2%, p=0.004). No significant differences in diagnostic yield were detected between "TBNA first" and "Cryobiopsy first" groups. We observed two cases of pneumothorax and one case of pneumomediastinum. Transbronchial cryobiopsy performed under EBUS guidance is a safe and useful approach that offers diagnostic histological samples of mediastinal lesions.

Diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound combined with rapid on‐site evaluation of transbronchial lung biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has the potential to increase endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) guide transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) accuracy in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). However, studies have reported controversial results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of EBUS-TBLB combination with ROSE in PPLs. A total of 152 patients with PPLs underwent EBUS were enrolled and completed this study. Patients were divided into EBUS combined with ROSE group (EBUS+ROSE group) and EBUS group (EBUS group). The diagnostic yield, operation time, and complications were compared between the two groups. The diagnostic yield in EBUS+ROSE group was 85.9%, the operation time was (24.6 ± 6.8) min, the diagnostic yield in EBUS group was 70.3%, and the operative time was (32.4 ± 8.7) min, there were significant differences in diagnostic yield (χ2 = 5.456, P = .016) and operation time (t = 3.167, P = .001) between the two groups. No severe procedure related complications were observed, such as, pneumothorax and hemorrhage. ROSE can improve the diagnostic yield and shorten the operation time. EBUS combined with ROSE is an effective diagnostic method for PPLs.

A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and duration of frame-based and Remebot robot-assisted frameless stereotactic biopsy

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and duration of Remebot robot-assisted frameless brain biopsy with those of standard frame-based stereotactic biopsy. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis of 66 patients undergoing stereotactic brain biopsy in our department from January 2015 to January 2019 was performed. We divided the patients into two groups: the frame-based group (n = 35) and the Remebot robot group (n = 31). Data on clinical characteristics, total procedure length, overall discomfort, diagnostic yield, complications, and postoperative length of hospital stay were retrospectively reviewed and compared between these two groups. Results No significant difference in diagnostic yield was detected in the two groups, with frame-based biopsy having a diagnostic yield of 91.4% and Remebot robot-assisted frameless brain biopsy having a diagnostic yield of 93.5%. The duration of the total procedure was 116.5 min for the frame-based biopsy and 80.1 min for the Remebot robot-assisted frameless brain biopsy (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rate or postoperative duration of hospitalization between the two groups. The overall patient discomfort in the frame-based group was significantly greater than that in the Remebot robot group (visual analog scale score 2.7 ± 1.2 versus 1.5 ± 0.7, p = 0.001). Conclusions Remebot robot-assisted frameless brain biopsy was as efficacious and safe as standard stereotactic frame-based biopsy. However, frameless biopsy can alleviate the suffering of the patient and reduce the total duration of the procedure. Remebot robot-assisted frameless brain biopsy is easy to use and better accepted by patients than frame-based biopsy.

The impact of covid-19 pandemic on urgent endoscopy in Italy: a nation-wide multicenter study

Objective: COVID-19 pandemic has seriously affected Italy. Radical changes occurred in the Italian NHS and thus in GI departments, as only urgent endoscopies were guaranteed. The study aimed to report how the demand for urgent endoscopy changed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy and to evaluate the appropriateness of urgent referrals in the Endoscopy Unit.Material and methods: Nation-wide, cross-sectional survey study in 54 Italian GI Units. Data were collected regarding urgent endoscopies (EGD, CS, ERCP) in two different time periods: March 2019 and March 2020.Results: Thirty-five (64.8%) GI endoscopy Units responded to the survey. The entity of reduction of overall urgent EGDs and CSs performed in March 2020 versus March 2019 was statistically significant: 541 versus 974 (−80%), p < .001 for EGD and 171 versus 265 (−55%), p < .008, for CS, respectively. No statistically significant reduction of urgent ERCP performed in March 2020 versus March 2019 was found. The increase in overall diagnostic yield for urgent EGD in March 2020 versus March 2019 was 7.3% (CI [0.028–0.117], p = .001). No statistically significant difference in diagnostic yield for CS between 2019 and 2020 was found.Conclusion: The study showed a statistically significant reduction of urgent EGD and CS performed during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, in March 2020, compared to March 2019. The diagnostic yield of urgent EGD performed in March 2020 was significantly higher than that of March 2019. No statistically significant difference was found in terms of diagnostic yield of urgent CS between March 2020 and March 2019.

EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study

Although conventional EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) has previously been considered first-line for sampling subepithelial lesions (SELs), variable accuracy has resulted in increased use of fine-needle biopsy (FNB) sampling to improve diagnostic yield. The primary aim of this study was to compare FNA versus FNB sampling for the diagnosis of SELs. This was a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the outcomes of EUS-FNA and EUS-guided FNB sampling (EUS-FNB) of SELs over a 3-year period. Demographics, lesion characteristics, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, number of needle passes, diagnostic adequacy of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), cell block accuracy, and adverse events were analyzed. Subgroup analyses were performed comparing FNA versus FNB sampling by location and diagnostic yield with or without ROSE. Multivariable logistic regression was also performed. Two hundred twenty-nine patients with SELs (115 FNA and 114 FNB sampling) underwent EUS-guided sampling. Mean patient age was 60.86 ± 12.84 years. Most lesions were gastric in location (75.55%) and from the fourth layer (71.18%). Cell block for FNB sampling required fewer passes to achieve conclusive diagnosis (2.94 ± 1.09 vs 3.55 ± 1.55; P= .003). The number of passes was not different for ROSE adequacy (P= .167). Immunohistochemistry was more able to be successfully performed in more FNB sampling samples (69.30% vs 40.00%; P< .001). Overall, sensitivity and accuracy were superior for FNB sampling versus FNA (79.41% vs 51.92% [P= .001] and 88.03% vs 77.19% [P= .030], respectively). On subgroup analysis, sensitivity and accuracy of FNB sampling alone was superior to FNA+ ROSE (79.03% vs 46.67% [P= .001] and 87.25% vs 68.00% [P= .024], respectively). There was no significant difference in diagnostic yield of FNB sampling alone versus FNB sampling+ ROSE (P > .05). Multivariate analysis showed no predictors associated with accuracy. One minor adverse event was reported in the FNA group. EUS-FNB was superior to EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of SELs. EUS-FNB was also superior to EUS-FNA alone and EUS-FNA+ ROSE. These results suggest EUS-FNB should be considered a first-line modality and may suggest a reduced role for ROSE in the diagnosis of SELs. However, a large randomized controlled trial is required to confirm our findings.

Performance of endobronchial-ultrasound guided miniforceps biopsy of targeted mediastinal and hilar lesions.

Performance of endobronchial-ultrasound guided miniforceps biopsy of targeted mediastinal and hilar lesions.

BAL fluid analysis in the identification of infectious agents in patients with hematological malignancies and pulmonary infiltrates.

The present study aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in patients with hematological malignancies and describe the most common pathogens detected in BAL fluid (BALF.) An analysis of 480 BALF samples was performed in patients with hematological malignancies over a period of 7 years. The results of culture methods, PCR, and immunoenzymatic sandwich microplate assays for Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) in BALF were analyzed. Further, the diagnostic thresholds for Aspergillus GM and Pneumocystis jiroveci were also calculated. Microbiological findings were present in 87% of BALF samples. Possible infectious pathogens were detected in 55% of cases; 32% were classified as colonizing. No significant difference in diagnostic yield or pathogen spectrum was found between non-neutropenic and neutropenic patients. There was one significant difference in BALF findings among intensive care units (ICU) versus non-ICU patients for Aspergillus spp. (22% versus 9%, p = 0.03). The most common pathogens were Aspergillus spp. (n = 86, 33% of BAL with causative pathogens) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 46, 18%); polymicrobial etiology was documented in 20% of cases. A quantitative PCR value of > 1860 cp/mL for Pneumocystis jirovecii was set as a diagnostic threshold for pneumocystis pneumonia. The absorbance index of GM in BALF of 0.5 was set as a diagnostic threshold for aspergillosis. The examination of BAL fluid revealed the presence of pathogen in more than 50% of cases and is, therefore, highly useful in this regard when concerning pulmonary infiltrates.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s12223-019-00712-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Diagnostic Yield of Dental Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for the Identification of Anatomic Structures in Cats.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of dental radiography (DR) and 3 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) methods for the identification of predefined anatomic structures in cats. For 5 feline cadaver heads and 22 client-owned cats admitted for evaluation and treatment of dental disease, a total of 22 predefined anatomic structures were evaluated separately by use of the DR method and 3 CBCT software modules [multiplanar reconstructions (MPR), tridimensional (3-D) rendering, and reconstructed panoramic views (Pano)]. A semi quantitative scoring system was used, and mean scores were calculated for each anatomic structure and imaging method. The Friedman test was used to evaluate values for significant differences in diagnostic yield. For values that were significant the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used with the Bonferroni-Holm multiple comparison adjustment to determine significant differences among each of the possible pairs of diagnostic methods. Differences of diagnostic yield among the DR and 3 CBCT methods were significant for 17 of 22 anatomic structures. For these structures, DR scores were significantly higher than scores for Pano views for 2 of 17 structures, but DR scores were significantly lower than scores for Pano views for 6 anatomic structures, tridimensional rendering for 10 anatomic structures, and MPR for 17 anatomic structures. In conclusion, it was found that CBCT methods were better suited than DR for the identification of anatomic structures in cats. Results of this study can serve as a basis for CBCT evaluation of dentoalveolar and other maxillofacial bony lesions in cats.

Prospective comparative study of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy and unroofing biopsy

Background and aimAdequate tissue acquisition is important in making treatment decisions for patients with upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (SETs). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with those of the unroofing biopsy technique. MethodsThis study was a single-center, prospective comparative study conducted at Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine. A total of 39 patients with SETs ≥15 mm were enrolled between January 2016 and August 2017. ResultsOf the 39 patients, 28 underwent biopsy with both techniques (4 underwent only unroofing and 7 underwent only EUS-FNB). Histological diagnosis was made with EUS-FNB in 64.3% and unroofing biopsy in 78.6% (p = 0.344), and immunohistochemical diagnosis was made with EUS-FNB in 46.4% and unroofing biopsy in 67.9% (p = 0.180). In the subgroup analysis (28 patients), there was no significant difference in diagnostic yield between the 2 methods The mean procedural time with EUS-FNB was shorter than that with unroofing biopsy (p < 0.001). The larger SET (≥ 20 mm) (p = 0.035) and satisfaction of procedure (p = 0.019) were positively associated with successful histological diagnosis by EUS-FNB. ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in the histological diagnostic yield for SETs between the EUS-FNB and unroofing biopsy techniques (CinicalTrials.gov. identifier NCT02646241).